Como Altmetrics é realmente usado? Vamos abordar brevemente o que diferentes grupos estão realizando com Altmetrics no mundo real, em seguida prever o que acreditamos que vai acontecer nos próximos um ou dois anos.
How are altmetrics actually used? We’ll briefly cover what different groups are already accomplishing with altmetrics in the real world, then look ahead to what we think will happen over the next year or two.
¿Cómo se usa realmente la altmetrics? Cubriremos brevemente qué es lo que diferentes grupos están logrando ya con altmetrics en el mundo real, entonces miraremos hacia adelante acerca de lo que pensamos que ocurrirá en uno o dos años.
3. What are “altmetrics”?
o “alternative metrics”
o new ways of measuring different, non-traditional
forms of impact, potentially of non-traditional
outputs.
o “alternative to only using citations”, not
“alternative to citations”.
o complementary to traditional citation-based
analysis.
4. Every researcher is a communicator
Within academia
Presentations and seminars
Funding and ethics applications
Academic books
Journal articles and posters
Term papers and essays
Meetings and conferences
Correspondence
Within society
Speaking at public events
Books for general audiences
Press
Social media
Blogs
Policy documents
We should measure both
5. New perspectives of impact
SOCIETAL IMPACT
ACADEMIC IMPACT
Journal Impact Factor
Citation counts
Traditional metrics
+
Download counts
Page views
Mentions in news reports
Mentions in social media
Mentions in blogs
Reference manager readers
… etc.
Alternative metrics
“altmetrics”
6. One available tool.
We are used a lot by
publishers, now some
institutions too.
We serve 2.5 million
requests a day.
11. Altmetrics tools don’t (yet)
provide good metrics for
impact
BUT
They can help you find
evidence of impact, successes
12. Evidence of public outreach?
An article on the ecological
impacts of the Fukushima
nuclear accident.
• > 1,859 twitter accounts
shared, combined follower
count of 2.5M.
• 68% of tweets sent from
Japan.
Figure 1
• 77% of tweets from members
of the public.
2012, Scientific Reports 2, 570
20. In general, altmetrics numbers…
X
Don’t represent the quality of
research.
X
Don’t indicate the quality of
individual researchers.
X
Don’t tell the whole story –
always look for qualitative
data as well
24. Problems
• 30 – 40% of recent biomedical
papers will have Altmetric
attention. But < 10% in social
sciences.
25. Problems
• 30 – 40% of recent biomedical
papers will have Altmetric
attention. But < 10% in social
sciences.
• Tools have subtle bias: data
sources are mainly those popular
in US, Europe
Focus has been shifting to metrics at the article level. Why should the value of a work be judged the journal it has been published in?
A London-based tech start-up founded in 2011.Small team of 5 operates out of King’s Cross, London.
We only count 1 mention from each person per source, so if you tweet about the same paper more than once, we will ignore everything but the first.A newspaper article contributes more to the score than a blog post, which contributes more than a tweet.at whether or not there's any bias towards a particular journal or publisher and at who the audience is.e.g., A doctor sharing a link with other doctors counts for far more than a journal account pushing the same link out automatically.
e.g., A doctor sharing a link with other doctors counts for far more than a journal account pushing the same link out automatically.