Essays On Capital Punishment

Essay on Capital Punishment
Many people live by the motto, "eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" but does the quote imply that
every state believes this also? According to the Death Penalty Information Center only thirty–four
states, the government, and the military actually carryout the death penalty sentence, and the use of
the sentence has been on the decline since 1997. There is a serious opposition when it comes to
society today. Thecrime rates are not being evaluated enough, the country is in recession, and many
families are desperate for any form of income. In order to maintain a healthy and safe environment
for the following generations capital punishment should be mandatory for every state.
In the judicial system and throughout society, the...show more content...
Today's society portrays itself in somewhat a different manor as it once did. Fifty years ago an
individual might leave their keys in the vehicle while walking inside to grab something, but in
current era the individual might think twice before performing this act for it might have a different
fate. Trust is found hard to exist in America's current society. There is a plethora amount of calamity
happening in America during this era of history. September 11, 2001 is a day theUnited States of
America will never forget; the country soon fell into a character of dismay, after the attack. America
then declared war on terrorism, and as the era stands America is amidst a recession. Furthermore
many Americans are concerned with the government's ampleness spending. According to a subject
of The Qualitative Report, "When asked to list the positive aspects of the death penalty,
participants...often referenced was the ability of the death penalty to deter other criminals and its
lower costs. This is illustrated in such statements as:
Uh, the public and the government doesn't have to pay to keep people in jail, they definitely will
not commit a crime again, closure for victim's families, and it is more of a deterrent than a life
sentence." (p836)
"Recent studies have found that the average cost per execution is between $2.5 million and $5
million. This is 2.5 to five times more expensive than the cost of keeping an
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Persuasive Essay On Capital Punishment
Capital punishment is one of the most controversial topics in today's world. Many people believe
that it is morally wrong to have capital punishment as a sentence to a crime. People also do believe
that it is morally permissible for a severe crime. Capital punishment is also known as the death
penalty. It can be given as a sentence when somebody is convicted of an extremely violent crime.
The biggest issue that can be seen with this is that somebody could be innocent and sentenced with
the death penalty because of the nature of the crime that they have been accused of even if they
didn't commit it. I believe that there is a moral line between using the death penalty and using other
forms of punishment. Many people use the moral reasoning of an eye for an eye to justify capital
punishment. However this doesn't work because a murderer would be murdered, a robber would
be robbed, a thief would be stolen from, a drug dealer would be sold drugs and so on down the
line for the rest of the infinite number of possible offenses. This doesn't work because most of
them wouldn't care if it was done back to them because they think it morally acceptable to commit
these crimes and that they would just be having something that is morally acceptable done to them.
Many criminals don't have super serious offenses that deserve to have an eye for an eye. For
example, a drug dealer is probably addicted to drugs so to sell and make them use drugs would just
be feeding the, addiction

Essay on The Pros and Cons of Capital Punishment
The topic of capital punishment is one that is highly debated in our society today. Capital
punishment is the ultimate punishment our society can give one for their actions. On the other
hand, it is viewed as a denial of human rights that promotes more violence in our society. Religious
Tolerance.org states that in the United States, over 13,000 people have been legally executed since
colonial times. ("Religious Tolerance") Is capital punishment a moral act? It is not a moral
punishment as it denies human rights, and the right to life, while degrading the individual, and
serving no true justification of the action at all.
The death penalty has not always been popular in the United States. It arose in the early years of the
...show more content...
As of April 2008, since 1976, Texas has had a shockingly high 405 executions. Virginia has had 98,
and Oklahoma has had 86. These numbers show that the majority of U.S. believes that the death
penalty is fair and right, despite many protesters everywhere. ("Death Penalty")
The death penalty denies the right to human life. The laws of this country restrict and harm one's
life when you have the ability to take it away. Often times people are not awarded a fair trial. This
means that they do not have the ability to appeal the conviction. By doing that, you do not allow one
to have the right to life.
The death penalty is not needed in our society. There is no social need to kill another for its
actions. It does not meet any vital need of society. There is no evidence anywhere that killing a
person will deter another from committing the same crime. The same crimes committed by people
who are executed are continually done. The death penalty does nothing to prevent or stop these
crimes. ("Amnesty International")
The death penalty strongly denies basic human rights. Why is it okay for a criminal to be killed for
his or her crimes? Are they really worthy of death? A person can be killed for killing another, but
one cannot be punished for other crimes with torture or imprisonment without trial. ("Amnesty
International") Some say murder is a crime so evil it requires death, but why does society not punish
others

Capital Punishment
Capital Punishment
Murder, a common occurrence in American society, is thought of as a horrible, reprehensible
atrocity. Why then, is it thought of differently when the state government arranges and executes a
human being, the very definition of premeditated murder? Capital punishment has been reviewed
and studied for many years, exposing several inequities and weaknesses, showing the need for the
death penalty to be abolished.
Upon examination, one finds capital punishment to be economically weak and deficient. A common
misconception of the death penalty is that the cost to execute a convicted criminal is cheaper than to
place a convict in prison for life without parole. Due to the United States judicial system, the process
of appeals,...show more content...
Whatever they need, they can get (Cummings).
In addition to being racially prejudiced, capital punishment places innocent lives at risk. Recently
in Chicago, a black man was released from death row after nearly sixteen years in prison. This
man, Anthony Porter, came within two days of receiving a lethal injection, until the courts finally
agreed hearing on his mental capacity. Porter was very lucky to receive an excellent attorney
who managed to prove that Porter was innocent and led the police to a prisoner in Milwaukee
who confessed (Kile). This shows the importance of the appeal process found in the courts, which
serve to protect the lives of innocent citizens of the United States of America. A writer for The
Christian Century writes, "Porter's case brings to light the very real danger that overzealous
prosecutors, sloppy legal work and poor legal defense teams will send people to their deaths for
crimes they didn't commit," (Kile). If Porter had an equipped defense attorney from the start,
he would never have been to prison and nearly killed. Ryan Cummings of The Economist observed
that more crimes are punishable by execution, more states have adopted the death penalty and the
appeals process has been shortened. The overall expansion of capital punishment endangers innocent
lives. Cumulatively, there is now less time and fewer tools to save innocent men and women

Capital Punishment
Capital punishment is the lawful infliction of the death penalty, and since ancient times, it has been
used to punish a large variety of offenses. The penalty of death is reserved for the most serious and
detested crimes. The legal system must sentence the death penalty to capital crime offenders.
Criminals convicted of murder or rape need to be executed because they are dangerous to the world
and the human race. However, America seems to to always want to put people in prison for life, but
how is that fair to the criminals who did not commit such a horrible crime, but still gets the same
punishment? The death penalty should be used more often, but is the death penalty the answer to
crime? The death penalty is not...show more content...
However, according to Stephen Nathanson, people would rather die than spend the rest of their lives
in prison (Whittier 14). Despite these facts, capital punishment should still be enforced on more
criminals. The death penalty was used in Biblical times for crimes such as kidnapping and
witchcraft. Today most countries still use capital punishment for many crimes and with varying
frequency. To stop the crime rate from rising, the United States must stop being soft–headed
sentimentalists when it comes to penalizing offenders. The murder rate has risen to an enormous
figure, and many of the offenders never get punished as the law says they shall be. The United States
legal system must start treating criminals like criminals and not like family. We need to start getting
tough with criminals. Letting the inmates have seven years on death row trying to change their
sentence is crazy. If we would execute them within three years of their conviction, crime would slow
down. Another area of concern is that administering capital punishment is inhumane, But that
perception needs to change. The most common method of inflicting the death penalty is lethal
injection which is when they take the convicted person to a room, strap them down and inject them
with poisonous drugs. Electrocution is another common method. Florida, for instance uses "Old
Sparky", the electric chair (Mauro 17).
Florida is the only state that still uses

Argumentative Essay On Capital Punishment
Capital punishment is beneficial to the community. It provides the society with a sense of security.
The death penalty contains a positive influence on the future. A heavily debated topic is, "Does
capital punishment deter people more than a life sentence to prison?" An explanation on why will be
covered later. An issues many people have withcapital punishment, is when it is just or not just. This
is a topic many stray away from, because it is difficult to decide. Finding the right consequence for
an action is difficult. While this paper is for the use of capital punishment, it is clearly not needed
for every crime, or even every murder. Overusing capital punishment, such as using it for every
murder, will negatively impact the country, and not using it has the same effect.
Allowing people who have committed mass murder to live in prison is not just. It does not seem
correct to force the families who have lost loved ones to the murderer, pay for his stay in prison.
Although, if the murderers are sentenced to death, it will give some a sense of security, knowing the
government is protecting the citizens. Martin Perlmutter has a good article on capital punishment
and explains the utilitarian view. Perlmutter argues that although the utilitarian view is not perfect,
since it focuses on the future without looking at the past, it does contain some valid points. The
focus will be on how Utilitarians believes punishment should be based, which is on the future.
Capital punishment usually creates positive outcomes for the future. The following paragraph will
cover deterrence in depth, but Utilitarianism believes this is when capital punishment is beneficial to
the society. If capital punishment did not have any benefits over a life sentence to prison,
Utilitarianism would not support it. Criticism of Utilitarianism is made by Perlmutter here, and it is
agreeable to look back as well as forward. Citizens need to understand what and why the criminal
committed in the past. Perlmutter believes our moral concepts look backwards, explaining why
focusing on the future is harmful.
Deterrence has played a sizeable role in the capital punishment argument for both sides. Author of
"The Ultimate Punishment"

The Ethics Of Capital Punishment Essay
The number of individuals executed via the Death Penalty peaked in 1999 and has been receding at
a dramatic rate. As it is becoming less frequently used, its necessity and morality has been called into
question. Both sides of the argument offer convincing arguments; however, mounting evidence
shows it is cost–prohibitive, it fails to act as a deterrent, it is racially biased, and that the justice
system is fallible. I will analyze both sides critically to try and gain insight into why we are part
of the 29% of countries who choose to retain it as a form of punishment. Moreover, the two
ethical theories I will use to carry out this analysis involve the Harm Principle and Moral
Relativism. Both ethical theories can support the pro and con side, so I will be using both as I
look at each side of the debate. Using the principles outlined in the Harm Principle and Moral
Relativism, I will analyze the morality of capital punishment and access which side the theories
gravitate towards. To begin, I will analyze the international underdog, the argument in support for
maintaining capital punishment. In "In Liberty," J. S Mill discusses that "...until your actions harm
people, society can't limit your free will. Laws are created to protect people from harm" (Marfori).
When an individual commits a crime worthy of receiving the Death Penalty it is evident that they are
a potential threat to endangering the life of others, in many cases they have already committed
murder or another

Capital Punishment: Right or Wrong? Essay
Capital Punishment: Right or Wrong?
All punishment is based on the same simple truth: there must be a penalty for wrongdoing. In order
for there to be punishment, there must be both a wrongdoer and an authority to inflict the penalty. In
a family, when you break a rule, the punishment is handed out by the parents. In society, punishment
for crime is carried out by a criminal justice system
(police, courts, and prisons). In both systems, one solid rule of thumb can be derived: if you do
something wrong, you will pay for it
(Kronenwetter xi). Our topic, capital punishment, otherwise known as death, is considered to be the
most severe penalty society can inflict. By doing so, it deprives the criminal of his or her...show more
content...
In ancient Greece, Egypt, and Syria, citizens were executed for a variety of things ranging from
perjury to murder.
Roman and Mosaic law of antiquity also endorsed the retaliating rule of
"an eye for and eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, burn for burn, and life for life." Often the trials
through which these convicted criminals were put over consisted of a group of witness, a mediator,
and the plaintiff. After a commonly unfair trial, the defendant was put to death
(Wekesser 16–17). This comes to the main focus of this issue; court inequality.
Those that oppose the death penalty make accusations that those of racial minorities are more likely
to be found guilty of capital crimes than those that are white. Furthermore, evidence of this
happening is in staunch agreement. In a 1986 study, conducted by Dr. Barry Nakell and Dr. Kenneth
Hardy of Temple University, they discovered remarkable conclusions in their study on racial
inequality in capital cases. In their studies Nakell said: "When the case was submitted to the jury, if
the defendant was black instead of white, he would, at best, face the same prospect that the jury
would deliberate his case at first degree murder. At worst, the black defendant would be fifty–six
times as likely to face a first degree murder deliberation than

Capital Punishment: A Question of Life and Death Introduction: The debate about capital
punishment, commonly referred to as "the death penalty", is as old as the death penalty itself. It is
caused by different controversial opinions about the propriety and legitimacy of the death penalty.
It's not surprising that since the start of this debate the philosophical or ethical arguments against or
in favour of the death penalty has remained notably unchanged. Thesis statement: The public concern
about the death penalty has reasonably resulted from perceived risk that errors in the legal system
and potential political and personal bias; could result in the execution of innocent people. Paragraph
1: According to Amnesty International, "The death penalty legitimizes an irreversible act of
violence by the state and will inevitably claim innocent victims. As long as human justice remains
fallible, the risk of executing the innocent can never be eliminated ." International attention has
started focusing on the frequent discovery of innocent people convicted as the failure of law
enforcement systems. Over the past twenty years there have been many well publicized cases in the
United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States as well as Canada of wrongfully
convicted persons. Thus, public confidence has been eroded as unjust conviction represents a triple
failure of the criminal justice systems; innocent has been put in jail; a true criminal is privileged to
enjoy

Argumentative Essay On Capital Punishment
Capital punishment is a harmful form of retributive justice that perpetuated the myth of redemptive
violence and harms the families of the victims and the perpetrators. Capital punishment, the
execution of individuals convicted of serious crimes, usually murder or treason, is often justified by
saying that it provides closure for victims families and is a deterrent for crime. Recently more
families of murder victims have been speaking out against the death penalty. One example is
Lorrain Taylor. Her two sons were killed while working on their car which had broken down on
the side of the road. In a quote from the ACLU Taylor said "Taking another person's life does not
stop violence. "There's a contradiction in responding to murder by executing people." Another
murder victim's family said "We do not think that the execution of Jojo's killer will make the world a
better place. "We honor Jojo's life by working for peace and social justice – goals that were
important to him (ACLU of Northern California)." There many website and groups of murder
victims families who are working to end the death penalty.
Body Paragraph 2
One of the primary arguments used for the death penalty is that is is a deterrent to crime. The belief
is that harsh punishments will keep people from committing serious crimes. While this opinion was
widely held some time ago in the united states more recently, people are starting to believe that
using the penalty as a deterrent is not effective. In 1985 62% of

Opposed on capital punishment. Capital punishment is also known as the death penalty, this is the
most extreme of all the sentencing one can receive. In the US, capital punishment has been present
since the establishment of the original colonies. It is especially for capital offenses; as in federal
murder, treason, terrorism, espionage, and large scale drug trafficking. Everybody has an
indisputable human right to life. This means even the people who commit murder. Sentencing
someone to death and executing them violates this right we all have. Everyone believes that human
life is valuable. Some of those against capital punishment believe that human life is so valued that
even the worst killers should not be deprived of the value of their lives. These people believe that
the value of the offender's life cannot and should not be destroyed by the criminal's bad...show more
content...
Gradually, countries and states are banning capital punishment. Drug companies are also declining to
allow their own products to be used for the death penalty. The U.S. is implementing fewer people and
public support for the death penalty is waning. Lessened crime rates, changes in the sentencing
procedures, shrinking the support to it, and demographics since many young and people of color are
less likely to support the death penalty are all leading toward less capital punishment and its ultimate
abolition in its future. Through the years, the death penalty has become even more debatable
throughout the world. Opponents to the practice declare it to be inhumane and unfair, and believe
that no life should be taken, regardless of the crime that has been committed. DNA testing has
proven the innocence of several individuals on death row, and the argument that no one should be
executed to avoid killing an innocent individual has grown in response. Several states in the U.S. no
longer support the death penalty, and many countries have abolished the practice

Capital Punishment
The definition of capital punishment is the legal punishment of death for violating criminal law. The
person who gets capital punishment is the ones who committed serious crimes. Methods of capital
punishment throughout the world are by stoning, beheading, hanging, electrocution, lethal injection
and shooting. The two most common methods capital punishment use in the United States are lethal
injection and electrocution.
The lethal injection is the most used form of capital punishment. It's an intravenous shot that kills the
criminal quick and painless. When capital punishment is done by electrocution the criminal is
strapped to a chair that a volts of electricity is pass through.
In America if all people agree...show more content...
The first pros of capital punishment are that it works as deterrence against major crimes. The death
penalty is a punishment that creates fear in the mind of any sane person. Most criminals would think
twice if they knew their own lives were at stake. Although there is no statistical evidence that death
penalty deters crime, we have to agree that most of us fear death.
The most conclusive evidence that criminals fear the death penalty more than life without parole is
provided by convicted capital murderers and their attorneys. 99.9% of all convicted capital murderers
and their attorneys argue for life, not death, in the punishment phase of their trial. (prodeathpenalty)
A Second pro is that a criminal that is executed can't another crime or escape. A dead criminal can
no longer commit a crime, and therefore the danger to the public is permanently removed.
A third pro of capital punishment is that it's more economical. Why should money be spent on a
criminal when it could be spent on education, the sick, or the needy? The only reason why it is so
expensive to execute an individual, is because of the numerous appeal processes. (~ab2166)
Another pro is that the retribution to the family and loves ones of the victims is payed. Endless
stress and anxiety plague the families of the victims and executions puts all those stresses to rest
better than life–long imprisonment or

Is Capital Punishment Ethical? Essay
Capital punishment is a difficult subject for a lot of people because many question whether or not
it is ethical to kill a convicted criminal. In order to critically analyze whether or not it is ethical, I
will look at the issue using a utilitarianism approach because in order to get a good grasp of this
topic we need to look at how the decision will impact us in the future. The utilitarianism approach
will help us to examine this issue and see what some of the consequences are with this topic of
capital punishment. For years, capital punishment has been used against criminals and continues to
be used today, but lately this type of punishment has come into question because of the ethical
question.
On the one hand, people who oppose the...show more content...
Clarify Concepts Before jumping right into the topic, it is important to clarify a few key concepts
and words that are often used when discussing capital punishment. Capital punishment refers to the
concept of ending a suspected criminals life, and the methods that are typically used are: lethal
injection, gas chamber, and the electric chair. The two most commonly used are lethal injection and
the gas chamber. Neither act is considered better or worse, because ultimately they end with the same
result. However, the alternative to these types of punishment is long–term imprisonment. Many
anti–death penalty advocates argue that long–term imprisonment is by far the best course of action,
because it allows for the possibility that if a mistake was made in the conviction of the suspect, they
would be able to correct it without ending the life of an innocent person.
Identify the Problem Now, in order to truly look at the topic at hand, I feel that it is necessary to
examine a few different viewpoints when it comes to this ethical issue. These viewpoints are called
deontological, and utilitarianism. Each approach provides a unique look in the idea of capital
punishment and will help to look at the consequences at the present time, as well as in the future.
The question of whether it is ethically acceptable to take the life of someone is at the heart

Since the early settlers first stepped foot on what is now the United States of America, capital
punishment has been reserved as a form of punishment for the people who have committed some of
society's most heinous crimes. Recently, support of capital punishment has begun to erode due to the
advancements of DNA technology and groups, such as the Innocence Project. Capital punishment,
however, remains to be an appropriate form of punishment for someone convicted of capital crimes,
and may be effective in deterring such offenses. In December, 1607, Captain George Kendall was
the first known person to be executed in the territory, now known as the United States of America.
Captain Kendall was shot by firing squad, accused of spying...show more content...
According to the Innocence Project, there have been 173 exonerations due to eyewitness
misidentification, 116 cases due to improper forensics, 51 cases due to false admissions, and 36
cases of unreliable informants. In addition, 17 people have been exonerated through DNA testing.
Opponents note, that these people have spent a combined 187 years on death row for a crime they
did not commit (2010). It is their stance that executions should be halted or at the very least, be sure
that persons awaiting execution are allowed to prove their innocence. Although opponents of capital
punishment have a valid point, these are just a small number of isolated cases, when compared to the
number of inmates currently awaiting execution throughout the United States. Although it is true
that the murder rate is higher in states that allow capital punishment, it is simply because there are
more states that allow it, moreover, the population of these "death penalty" states exceeds the
population of "non–death penalty states (2009). It is not difficult to imagine that the larger the
population is, the greater probability exists for crimes to occur, including murder. Capital
punishment may also prove to be beneficial in deterring capital crimes, however, skeptics rebut this
claim. Beginning in 1963, the United States Supreme Court imposed rules dealing with searches and
confessions. During that time, the nation's

Capital Punishment
Capital punishment should be legal in all of the 50 United States of America. I do not believe that
people who commit horrific crimes should locked up to live an almost luxurious sentence, they
should be killed! There are many reasons why hard criminals should be done away with. This essay
will reveal some of my personal reasons why as well as reasons we should support capital
punishment in the United States. According to www.Derechos.net, "Capital punishment is the
execution of a criminal pursuant to a sentence of death imposed by a competent court." Meaning,
the court decides if the criminal gets to be killed. Well it wasn't always like that. There was a time
long ago where even in religious beliefs...show more content...
Okay, a murderer commits a crime, now what? Well the convicted murderer usually on average
serves a sentence of less than six years according to Nancy Jacobs. Six years behind bars for
taking the life of another person! Six years of paying taxes to feed the mouth of a person who not
caring for others took the life of somebody. Want some statistics? Well according to Justice for All,
"Six percent of the young adults paroled since 1978 who were convicted of murder were arrested for
murder again within six years of their release." So what was the point of arresting them in the
first place only to release them after a measly six years of prison time? If these people would have
be executed the first time they were captured and convicted of murder, we would have prevented
many murders of innocent people. We need to stop these repeating murders but it seems that our
justice system almost helps them continue their horrendous acts by locking them up for awhile then
releasing them all over again. Although the death penalty is a deterrent, it is not nearly as strong a
deterrent as it would be were it implemented more often. The deterrence theory states that in order
for a crime to be deterred, justice must be swift, severe, and certain. With numerous appeals, the
death penalty is not swift. In fact, the average amount of time spent on death row before being
executed is ten years, this is according to

Essay on Should Capital Punishment Be Legal?
Capital punishment is a very controversial issue today. There are good statements made on both
sides of the argument. A couple of questions should be asked before deciding which side to take in
the never ending debate of capital punishment. Is capital punishment a cruel and unusual way of
punishing serious offenders? Should the mentally ill be susceptible to capital punishment? A lot of
states made capital punishment legal, but not all of them use it as freely as some states like Texas.
The state of New Jersey supports capital punishment as a form, of corrections, but some of the
offenders end up waiting for the day of their execution until the day they die. On the other hand,
Texas, also a state that supports capital punishment as a...show more content...
It also allows for the ones that do want to reform their ways to peacefully serve their time without
getting into confrontations with the ones that do not have anything to live for. Why should one
comply with the rules of the prison, if they know that they will never get out? After all, prisoners
have rights too. What is the most horrible thing that the prison staff can do to a prisoner? Throw
them in the hole? The 8th amendment protects the prisoners from being placed in solitary
confinement for more than thirty days.
In many people's eyes, the punishment that is given to offender isn't severe enough. Without capital
punishment, many criminals that committed serious felonies would walk the streets once again.
Because prison overcrowding is a very severe issue today, many hardcore criminals end up either
returning to the community without serving for their crime without jail sentence at all. Due to
prison overcrowding, the judge has no choice, but to let the criminals off on probation. Now
today, probation isn't what it used to be when it was introduced. It is far from John Augustus's idea
of keeping a close watch on a small amount of offenders. In my eyes, probation is just another way
to free up jail space today. Most of probationers don't even see the probation officer.
A friend of mine got busted for possession of marijuana and got let off on probation. The problem
with this, is that they threatened to give him urine

Capital Punishment Is The Ultimate Punishment
Have you ever thought of the person next to you is a killer or a rapist? If he is, what would you
want from the government if he had killed someone you know? He should receive the capital
punishment. The capital punishment is the ultimate punishment given to the precarious crimes. It is
the last stage of capital punishment. There are different methods of like hanging, electric chair, lethal
injection, firing squad, gas chamber. Murderers and rapist should be given extreme punishment, and
they have to pay for their wrongdoing. We can observe crime rates are accelerating day–by–day. The
government should enforce such laws to create a high alert around the society and endorse a secure
ruling to its people. But before talking about the essential role of a death penalty, we have to think
about the meaning and purpose of any punishment. According to Muhlhausen, 67% of American
favor the death for these convicted of murder, while 28 percent are opposed, which shows that there
are still more people who believe that capital punishment is the best way to reduce the crime rates.
Capital punishment is the best answer to murder and final warning which all that would – be
criminals fear. Similarly, it helps to solve the overcrowding problems and provide closure for
victims. Criminals fear death penalty so it can be a final warning so that we can solve
overcrowding problems and provide closure for victims.
Capital punishment is the ultimate warning. Every person in the world has a common

Argument for Capital Punishment Essay
Argument for Capital Punishment
If it were up to me, every murderer in this country would be put behind bars on death row and have
their life taken from them just as they took the life of another. The guidelines of " an eye for an
eye" go back thousands of years. Many countries still hold true to these guidelines. Although America
doesn't follow the same as these countries, I believe when it comes to murder, they should. Putting
people to death for committing murder makes other potential murderers think twice about killing
someone. Capital punishment deters many murders every day. If all that had to be done was spend
life in jail, getting free meals, having a roof over their head, and place to sleep at night, then killing
...show more content...
We have to step up and show we mean business, and that we intend to rid our country of
murderers. Another thing the anti capital punishment people say is that we should value all
human life. My faith in God tells me that human life isn't just a functioning body, and we have
spirits given to us by him. Our spirits define who and what we are, and having this means we
have love for other humans beings. Murderers don't have this spiritual aspect of human life, so
therefore if they don't have it in the first place, it can not be taken away. Some people appose the
death penalty because they believe it cost more to kill the person than to keep them in prison for
life. If you put any thought into this at all, you will see that it is entirely wrong. If you put
someone in jail for life, you have to feed them every single day, keep them sheltered, and take up
the space in the jails. If you put someone to death, you don't have to worry about any of that. The
cost of executions is far less than life in jail. Death penalty cases have alot of appeals, that cost alot
of money, but life without parole cases have just about the same amount of appeals and cost just the
same. When it comes down to it, putting the murderers in our country to death saves money, time,
and space in our jails. Others say that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment. However in
most states, the person convicted has a choice between the electric chair or lethal injection. When a
person is

Essay on Capital Punishment Debate
Capital Punishment Debate
Is Capital Punishment, otherwise known as the Death Penalty, a disgraceful and unjust way to kill a
fellow Human being? Or is it a justifiable way to punish someone in a modern day society? Some
nations use the Death Penalty as their most severe punishment. Capital Punishment is one of the
most debated issues in current day life. Is it acceptable or not? Many politicians have put their
arguments across highlighting both their benefits and drawbacks.
In the past people in Britain were often executed by hanging or by having their heads severed. But
nowadays very few countries allow the Death Penalty. In fact, it follows the abolition of the death
penalty for...show more content...
Less than one century later, Parliament voted to suspend for five years the death penalty for murder,
when it passed Sidney Silverman's private members bill in 1965.
A Conservative vote in 1938 called for legislation to halt hanging for a period of five–years. It never
lasted; and due to the beginning of World War Two it was postponed. In 1957 the compromise
legislation – The Homicide Act – followed by a public flare–up over the hanging of the following
three individuals: Timothy Evans in 1950, Derek Bentley and Ruth Ellis, the last women to be a
victim of the Death Penalty in 1955. The Homicide Act created a number of anomalies: They found
theft a punishable crime, whereas rape was over looked, placing property in a higher position than
human welfare. Due to these anomalies the use of Capital Punishment declined. There were only
two convictions in each year of: 1962; 1963; and 1964. The last capital punishment conviction that
took place in Britain was of two young people: Peter Anthony Allen, aged 21 and Gwynne Owen
Evans, aged 24. They both were accused on killing John Alan West, a milkman.
The Death Penalty was completely abolished after another vote in the House of Commons, which
led to an eradication of the Death Penalty. Since the death penalty was truly abolished, there have
been 13 attempts to bring back the death penalty for various categories of

As a final point, on capital punishment the discussion turns to John Stuart Mill and his utilitarian
view point that supports capital punishment. In Mill's speech, "In Support of Capital Punishment"
(1868), he contends that capital punishment is actually a better way to treat individuals rather than
being confined to prison for a life sentence (Van Camp, 2014). It is viewed that Mill's does
successfully present this argument by suggesting that execution is essentially a quick end to
suffering as opposed to suffering for the remainder of one's life. One who is sentenced to a life in
prison is subjected to an environment that will only offer cruel mental and physical punishment and
unhappiness ultimately leading to death (McBrien, 2010). Although...show more content...
Not everyone will think alike or even be persuaded to think differently about issues within society
such as, euthanasia or capital punishment for the insane. However, it is viewed that there is a
possibility that an agreement can be made that all of these situations present ethical dilemmas that
are not easy to simply make a decision of yes or no and right or wrong. In all honestly, it is of the
belief that as much as one would love to quickly dismiss the fact that an individual is insane or
automatically believe that euthanasia and making someone comfortable is wrong, it is just not that
easy. There is truly multiple things that have to be considered, true there is an ethical standard, but
there is also an ethical obligation to do what is fair and right with regard to the rights and privileges
of all individuals, even if it is not

Essays On Capital Punishment

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais de Custom Paper Writing Service

Mais de Custom Paper Writing Service (20)

Último

Último (20)

Essays On Capital Punishment