Meeting 9, social media and scholarship, assignment 4, 22 may evening session
1. DOING DIGITAL SCHOLARSHIP:
DISCOVERING AND USING DIGITAL
TOOLS IN ACADEMIC WORK
22 May 2012
INTERNET PRACTICE: PART 2
Ljubljana
Meeting 9: Social Media & Scholarship
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences, FDV 20
Tuesday, 22 May 2012, evening session, ‘non-regular’ students
Nicholas W. Jankowski
Adjunct Professor, University of Ljubljana
Associate Researcher
KNAW e-Humanities Group
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
nickjan@xs4all.nl 1
2. Agenda
1. Introduction (10 min)
• Getting acquainted with Zipcast platform
22 May 2012
2. Quiz 2: proposal
Ljubljana
3. Assignment 3, Mendeley
• Mendeley groups
• bibliographies
• Blog posts: reflections on Mendeley
4. Assignment 4: note-taking / annotation software
• OneNote, Zotero
• Word, PDF Pro 10
5. Assignment 7: alternative proposal
6. Social media & Scholarship (readings) 2
7. Assignment 5 (Thursday practicum session)
5. Quiz 2: Information
• Features
• Exam Professor software
22 May 2012
• Open book; individual exercise (no consultation)
• Randomly arranged questions & answers
• Questions (not answers) distributed Wednesday, 23 May, noon
Ljubljana
• Date: Thursday, 24 May; 30 min. (16.00-16.30)
• Readings & topics
• Digital Scholar: Chapters 6-9
• Schroeder, R., & Spencer, D. (2009). Social scientists and the domestication of
e-research tools. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute. Available here.
• Mollett, A., Moran, D., & Dunleavy. (2011). Using Twitter in university
research, teaching and impact activities: A guide for academics and
researchers. Report, LSE Public Policy Group. Available here. 5
• Additional topics: Mendeley, OneNote, Zotero, Twitter
6. Mendeley, Assignment 3: Tasks
• Searching for literature related to Group topic
22 May 2012
• Creating Mendeley group
• Creating library of (meta-data on) bibliographic entries
Ljubljana
• Uploading (some) documents to group library
• Preparing bibliography related to group topic; uploading to Dropblox
• Annotations on (some of) literature
6
15. Mendeley: summary of
Assignment 3
22 May 2012
• Jankowski invited to all Mendeley groups
• Two groups, 9 & 10, have prepared no entries in Mendeley
Ljubljana
libraries
• Some persons in groups 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10 have contributed
little to Mendeley library of documents
15
16. Assignment 4: note-taking &
annotations
EXPLORING NOTE-TAKING & ANNOTATION SOFTWARE
In Assignment 3 literature was identified related to the topics assigned to each of the groups;
these topics are noted again below. This literature serves as point of departure for Assignment
22 May 2012
4: preparation of notes / annotations on this literature using either OneNote or Zotero.
Students should discuss and decide which (or both) of these two tools will be used. Although
the annotations will be prepared individually, the assignment is to be carried out in subgroups
of 2-3 students from each of the 10 groups. As with other assignments, the entire group is to
confer near the end of the exercise.
Ljubljana
Compose reflections on this activity in gaining familiarity with note-taking software. These
reflections, maximum one page in length excluding possible screenshots and
references, should be prepared individually. Preparation of reflections may benefit by
performing a general search of reviews, videos and other materials on the software; be sure to
reference the use of such material in the blog post. Reflections are to be posted on the
individual student blogs and uploaded to a folder on course website no later than Monday 30
April, 21.00. [ERROR: should be Monday, 21 May, 21.00]
Complete the group reports of literature notes / annotations initiated during the in-class
assignment. Assign an editor from group members who will be responsible for collecting the
subgroup annotations and compiling them into a group report that will be uploaded to the
group Dropbox folder for Assignment 4 no later than Monday 21 May, 21.00.
16
17. Assignment 4: resources
• Zotero documentation (extensive; select 1-2 items)
• Video: Why use OneNote?
• Microsoft materials on OneNote
22 May 2012
• Getting Stuff Into Your Library
• Adding Items
• Adding Files
• Organizing Your Library and Taking Notes
• Collections and Tags
• Duplicate Detection
• Notes
Ljubljana
• Related
• Searching
• Sorting
• Generating Bibliographies, Citations and Reports
• Creating Bibliographies within Zotero
• Word Processor Integration
• Reports
• Citation Styles
• Syncing, Collaboration and Backup
• Data and File Syncing
• Groups
• Backup
• Getting the Most Out of Zotero
• Knowledge Base
• Languages and Localization
• Locate Items In a Library Near You
• Plugins
• Preferences
• Proxies
• Retrieve PDF Metadata
• Timelines
•
•
Tips and Tricks
Third Party Documentation
17
• Zotero for Mobile
21. Zotero: Group 8: Masa Savc
BIBLIOGRAPHY
American Negro Newspapers, 1880-1914
Emma Lou Thornbrough
22 May 2012
The Business History Review
Vol. 40, No. 4 (Winter, 1966), pp. 467-490
Published by: The President and Fellows of Harvard
College
Ljubljana
Article Stable
URL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/3112124
Price Discrimination in Oligopoly: Evidence from
Regional Newspapers
Marcus Asplund, Rickard Eriksson and Niklas Strand
The Journal of Industrial Economics
Vol. 56, No. 2 (Jun., 2008), pp. 333-346
Published by: Blackwell Publishing
21
Article Stable
URL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/25483411
22. Zotero: Group 9 reflections
Špela Anzeljc, Tina Rojec
• No blog posts: Julija Lojen, Tjaša Traunšek,
22 May 2012
Ljubljana
22
27. Grading of assignments
Blog reflections
• 0 = assignment not submitted
22 May 2012
• 1 = poorly done; no reflection
• 2 = some reflection
Ljubljana
• 3 = average, acceptable
• 4 = good
• 5 = excellent reflective blog post
Other assignments also based on 5-point scale (e.g., Assignment
3 uploading to Dropbox of bibliography)
27
Make-up assignment: under consideration….
28. Assignment 7 (final exercise)
PREPARING PORTFOLIO ON ENHANCING SCHOLARLY PUBLICATIONS; PREPARATION OF GROUP PRESENTATION
Most academic publications – conference papers, journal articles, book chapters – are
prepared as texts with few to none of the functions available in a Web environment: no
22 May 2012
color, no dynamic visualizations, no hyperlinks to external resources, no links within a
document (e.g., from in-text reference to bibliographic entry). This final assignment for the
practicum Doing Digital Scholarship provides opportunity for groups of students to develop
enhanced versions of traditionally prepared academic texts. The assignment allows students to
utilize a number of the tools available for doing digital scholarship that will be presented
Ljubljana
during the practicum: annotation tools, reference management tools, collaboration tools, and
tools for publishing and presenting.
Each subgroup, 2-3 students, from the pre-assigned groups is responsible for enhancing one of
the three traditional academic texts that are assigned to a group; see list below. Groups
members are expected discuss their approaches to enhancing the three texts and to utilize
tools related to the following tasks:
Note-taking & document annotating (e.g., OneNote, Zotero)
Reference management (Mendeley, EndNote)
Collaborating (e.g., group blog, Skype, Elluminate, Adobe Connect)
Co-authoring & file sharing software (e.g., Google Docs, Dropbox)
Presentation software (e.g., Prezi, Powerpoint, Keynote)
Publishing platforms and venues ( iBooks Author; Commentpress; 28
Issuu, repositories, e.g., SSRN)
29. Assignment 7: Illustrations of enhanced publications
Our Choice; Solar System, JFK: Day by Day; Imagining the Iliad, The Waste Land
22 May 2012
Ljubljana
29
7
30. Assignment 7: Alternative
An in-class practical exercise in using tools presented during
course:
22 May 2012
• Alternative literature resources (e.g., university repositories)
• Dropbox (cloud storage)
Ljubljana
• Mendeley (reference management software)
• OneNote (or other note-taking tool)
• Zotero (reference management, annotation)
• Annotation tools (e.g., Word Review, PDF Pro)
• Presentation tools (e.g., Prezi, Zipcast
• Blog post with reflections on exercise
30
32. Topics
Online collaboration tools
Social Media & Scholarship
Week 5 (15 & 17 May): Readings
22 May 2012
• Required: Chapters 10, 11 of Digital Scholar
• Supplementary
• Schroeder, R., & Spencer, D. (2009). Social scientists and the domestication
of e-research tools. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute. Available here.
Ljubljana
• Berkman Center for Internet & Society, Interactive. Website with podcasts
Week 6 (22 & 24 May): Readings
• Required: Chapters 12, 13 of Digital Scholar
• Supplementary
• Bulger, M., Meyer, E. T., Flor, G. de
la, Terras, M., Wyatt, S., Jirotka, M., Eccles, K., et al. (2011). Reinventing
research? Information practices in the humanities. London. Available here.
• Mollett, A., Moran, D., & Dunleavy. (2011). Using Twitter in university
research, teaching and impact activities: A guide for academics and 32
researchers. Report, LSE Public Policy Group. Available here.
33. Using Twitter in university research, teaching and
impact activities: A guide for academics and
researchers.
22 May 2012
Ljubljana
33