Forms Of Democracy Explained

Forms Of Democracy
What is Democracy?
A democracy is a system of government where the citizens have the right to elect government
representatives who jointly create a government body for the entire nation. In a democratic
government, people have certain rights that the government can't take away from them; these rights
are guaranteed. The eight main forms of democracy are:
1. Direct democracy 2. Representative democracy 3. Presidential democracy
4. Parliamentary democracy 5. Authoritarian democracy 6. Participatory democracy 7. Islamic
democracy
8. Social democracy
Direct Democracy – Direct democracy is when citizens vote for a policy directly. If the
government needs to pass a law or policy, then it goes to the people. The people place a vote on
the issue and through their vote, they decide the fate of their country. When the country's
population is small and educated a direct democracy is a good idea. Switzerland has had an
extensive history of very successful direct democracy. However, most countries are too big so it
makes it too complicated for a direct democracy to work. In these cases, people choose to elect
representatives from their country on their behalf, instead of voting on every issue.
Representative Democracy– Representative democracy is when the citizens choose to vote for who
will represent them in a parliament. Its reputation relies on defending the rights of most of the
people in the state and also the minorities. Australia and New Zealand are examples of countries
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay on Democracy in America
Democracy is a unique type of government, and the purpose of this essay is to illustrate the
strengths and weaknesses that a democratic government provides. I will detail that many
components of this type of society are both strengths and weakness as each component has
beneficial aspects as well as unavoidable pitfalls. Ademocracy is a government by the people, in
which the power is vested in the people themselves. The people then elect representatives who
conduct their power in a free electoral system. The Declaration of Independence, which says that all
men are created equal, was written on the premise of a democracy. According to John Locke, who
wrote The Social Contract, before acknowledging that an individual is part of a...show more content...
The laws of society are applied equally to everyone, but equitable to the circumstances. The same
holds true for taxes: those with higher incomes pay a larger percentage of their income in taxes than
those in lower tax brackets. Although not equally applied, the tax laws are equitable. Democratic
laws are written in such a way as to allow interpretation depending upon circumstances. "A thousand
circumstances, independent of the will of man, facilitate the maintenance of a democratic republic
in the United States" Initially, laws are difficult to design because lawmakers can't think of every
possibility, every scenario, and every obstacle that may present itself in the democracy. Despite
these difficulties, laws keep society together and provide unity for the citizens. Advantages for
creating laws, include, but are not limited to, providing direction for the collection of taxes,
declaring clear expectations for compliance and punishment of citizens and elimination of chaos. A
weakness of democracy is the "Tyranny of the Majority". This is an inevitable pitfall, because in a
democracy, the power is vested foremost in the people the constituting the society itself. Alexis de
Tocqueville wrote on this concept:
"Democratic laws generally tend to promote the welfare of the greatest possible number; for they
emanate from the majority of the citizens, who are subject to error, but who cannot have an interest
opposed to

The Justice of Democracy Essay
The Justice of Democracy
Why was Socrates the renowned Philosopher put to death, was it based on his political and spiritual
beliefs or because he taught his beliefs to his students? He believed that he was in a private pursuit
of truth, a search for wisdom. He turned the youth against the Gods of Athens, proposing that the
opinions of experts were the only pertinent opinions. Socrates never voiced his concerns or chose to
leave the society that had supported him for some seventy years of his life. The democratic
government allowed the majority to rule, it enabled the people to vote and decide what is just. The
government was based on a procedural process, one, which took into account the input of the
majority. In this manner they...show more content...
In this way Socrates felt justified in turning away from the belief system, his own right in his mind,
as well as corrupting the minds of the youth. His seemingly private matter turned into a public matter
when his actions started effecting the well being of the community, his pursuits then became a
political matter. The form of government called democracy, Socrates claimed not to agree with its
principles. In pursuing wisdom, truth and justice, he was acting in a democratic manner, the same
political process that he condemned for its corruptive nature.
Socrates proposed a system where the experts decide the decisions of the country, because they are
the only ones who have the knowledge. He defines knowledge, as "knowing that you do not know
and ignorance as thinking you know what you really do not know." (Apology, 4). Then the question
is proposed why would a country need "experts", those who are able to admit that they are wrong, to
make just and right decisions for that country? Socrates believed philosophers, such as himself were
the only mentally equipped citizens qualified to make decisions that effect the path of this country.
The democratic system has been tested and proven, citizens utilize the strengths of the political
system. In the democratic manner, a system which Socrates felt he knew enough about to defy,
Socrates should have employed these strengths to his own advantage. The majority sentenced him
and he had

Characteristics Of Democracy
The structure of world governments in societies looks different in many countries around the world.
The types of government have changes throughout history with some doing better than others in the
world. One of the leading governmental system today is the democracy with over half the countries
in the world having some form of democracy. Democracy is focused on the people rule where the
community tries to elect our official that we belief best to represent us in our government like in the
U.S. The ancient Greeks had many debates about the effectiveness, practicality, and the
implications of democracy as the governing system in a country. Two of the important
perspectives from Greek philosophers come from Plato and Aristotle. Both discussed how they
viewed a democratic system would work and the weakness that the system held. Plato discussed
democracy as a flawed system far away from the ideal society while Aristotle stated that it is a
flawed system but with a few change it could be the ideal society. The questions is what are the
good characterization of society government according to Plato and Aristotle, what the flaws and
strengths in the system of democracy are according to them and can democracy be the ideal society.
The system of government is important to how a society will develop and learn in dealing with the
world. Plato explored these system of government in this book the Republic specifically talking
about the process that regimes go through. According to Plato

Essay about Constitutional Democracy
Constitutional Democracy
The basic premise of a constitutional democracy is that government has rules and all of the people
have voices. Through free and fair elections we elect candidates to represent us. The Constitution of
the United States guarantees us the right to do this, and to live democratically. The framers attacked
tyrannical government and advanced the following ideas: that government comes from below, not
from above, and that it derives its powers from the consent of the governed; that men have certain
natural, inalienable rights; that it is wise and feasible to distribute and balance powers within
government, giving local powers to local governments, and general powers to the national...show
more content...
It is a way of deliberation, to tune out the clink of money in the background when you talk to
somebody, so that you can concentrate on that person's message and judge it on its own merits.
It means looking at someone and not saying to yourself, "That's my aunt" or
"That's my boss," but rather, that is someone with his or her own inclinations and
desires, in other words, a true Individual who incidentally happens to have this relation to me, as a
relative or a superior.
On a grander scale, individualism is putting the individual above the state and country. In those
countries that have always been proud of their traditional values of emphasis on the family or the
country above self they see
Individualism as a direct attack on these values. However, we live in a democratic country and we
believe in individualism and equal opportunity for all persons. Equal opportunity for everyone is
idealistic. Roosevelt outlined a second bill of rights which the book states answers the question,
"what kind of equality?" This second bill of rights was four freedoms. They were
freedom from want, freedom from fear, freedom of speech & expression and freedom of
worship. There are laws and acts to guarantee equal opportunity. For example, the Equal Pay Act of

Modern Democracy Essay
In 1947, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Sir Winston Churchill, articulated a scathing
opinion of the global political spectrum in the post–war era after witnessing the fall of European
fascism in Germany and Italy as well as the impending rise of communism. He remarked, "It has
been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried."
This essay agrees vehemently with Churchill's assertion that democracy – for all of its faults – was,
and still is, the world's preeminent form of government when compared with all other alternatives,
notably fascism and communism. By analyzing modern democracy in theory and in practice, this
paper elucidates how democracy is at an intrinsic advantage in...show more content...
This parallel growth is due to the fact that democracy is inherently malleable, which allows it to
be altered to best serve the needs of the people. A level of guaranteed individual freedom which
was not necessary in antiquity is now required by humanity because of changes in progressive
social views, technology, and the division of labor. For example, the abolition of slavery has had a
measurable affect on modernity's opinion of human rights. Professor Jeffrey Kopstein of the
University of Toronto identifies the difference between modern and ancient liberties as an issue of
"freedom to vs. freedom from". Modern democracies guarantee individuals' freedom from
oppression, under the government or other individuals, which allows for the freedom of mobility.
The modern citizen is entitled to,
The right...to express his opinion, choose a profession and practice it, dispose of his own property
and even to misuse it; the right to come and go without permission, and without explaining what one
is doing or why; the right of each person to associate with other individuals – whether to discuss their
interests, or join in worship, or simply to fill the time in any way that suits his fancy; and each
person's right to have some influence on the administration of the government – by electing all or
some of the officials, or though representations, petitions, or demands that the authorities are more or
less obliged to take into consideration. (Constant 2)

Essay about Digital Democracy
Digital Democracy
Over the years the media has made citizens major role players in politics. Ross Perot opened eyes
by putting the 1992 Election in the media and thereby allowing voters to become directly involved
in politics. The Internet, the new form of mass media "has turned into a major political and media
industry" (Grossman 16). Because of the rise the Internet has taken, the idea of direct democracy has
risen. The foundation of direct democracy is in self–government. The claim is that the presence of
the Internet will increase citizens' involvement in political issues by allowing them access to more
information. This is significant because it takes a look at the impact of technology on society and
politics, as well by...show more content...
Representative government is grounded in the Constitution. The Constitution was created to protect
citizens from factious groups through the establishment of an extended republic intended to
"diminish the chances that any one faction will gain majority" (Kamark & Nye 29). However, it is
still possible that citizens, as the majority, will tyrannize each other (25).
Theorists contend that representative government is headed for direct democracy by way of the
Internet. Essentially what will happen is that representatives will no longer be needed because
citizens will be able to use the Internet to make decisions. Grossman contends that "the more power
[citizens] have to control their government and to involve themselves in making its decisions, the
better" (41). Over the years citizens have been obtaining information through the media, newspapers,
and other forms of mass media. The issues that arise with obtaining information through these
sources are that the government can easily censor them. With the Internet comes "vastly expanded
capacities for data collection, for computation, and for automation" (Kamark & Nye 22).
In his essay, Applbaum expresses the need for increased intelligence with the increase of
information available on the Internet (Kamark & Nye 22). Basically, as the Internet becomes a
larger resource for information, it will fall to the same fate as other forms of mass media and will
therefor become more censored as

Democracy Essay : What Is Democracy?
What is democracy? To me democracy is the freedom to choose how your country is run.
According to the Merriam Webster dictionary, it defines democracy as government by the
people1. Democracy gives us the freedom to choose our government officials and political
leaders. We have the right to choose our leaders and the way we live when many others do not
have that power. We are privileged as a country; many aspire to be like us. Our country through
democracy, gives us the opportunity to live life how we would like to. This idea is known as the
American Dream, which is different for everyone. The American Dream is most commonly
depicted as a good job, making good money, a spouse and children, and living a good life in
general. Outsiders may think the grass is greener on the other side, but in reality it is not. Our
country is going downhill and fast. In ten years I do not know where the U.S. will be, but I hope
that we will become stronger and figure out our faults now as a whole. In many ways, I see our
freedoms have expanded, but only to be replaced with new rules that blockade those new freedoms.
In the past couple of decades our country has changed so much. Even more has changed in the past
century. Slavery has been frowned upon and thrown out, the equal rights movement took place and
showed that we are all equal at the end of the day. With that being said, there are still some that
ridicule others and their races, and believe that they are superior to the others. Some

Achieving Democracy and Equality Essay
This paper shows why both democracy and equality are desirable, and why democracy, in its true
sense, is an important step to achieve greater equality. There are many reasons why political
philosophers need to look beyond the one person, one vote conception of democracy to understand
why such theories have allowed social and economic inequality to continue to exist. While many
democracies do not live up to our expectations in regards to providing equality, there are
explanations for this and methods of overcoming such problems.
Is equality desirable?
The first thing to consider is whether equality is desirable, and if so, what kinds of equality are
desirable. For example, should young children have equal voting rights? The consensus...show more
content...
Consider the case of the recently proposed Malaysia solution. The proposed deal between
Malaysia and Australia would have meant that 800 asylum seekers who arrive in Australia by
boat would be sent to Malaysia as a deterrent, while Australia would in exchange take 4000
refugees from one of Malaysia's refugee camps. The intended effect was to 'stop the boats' and
save the Australian government from political turmoil. The people who this legislation has the
greatest effect on are the asylum seekers who plan to travel to Australia by boat, and the asylum
seekers who are waiting in refugee camps in Malaysia. However, because these groups of people
are not part of the demos creating the law, and have no influence on the legislation, are they obliged
to follow it? While the interests of those seeking asylum in Australia should be considered by the
demos in a liberal democracy, this does not give anyone who interacts with the state the automatic
right to the ballot and citizenship. In summary, there is a type of equality that each person should
have. It may seem arbitrary to argue that a demos is constituted by a particular geographical
location, but this is not the case. It is in fact quite pragmatic, as the geographical relationship
between each member of a nation–state helps form their common life.
Myers points out that there are 'virtually limitless ways in which human beings might be equal or
unequal.' From birth, individuals

Democracy Essay examples
Democracy
When I think of the word democracy, I think of Government. Democracy is a form of government
in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their
elected agents under a free electoral system. This means that Government must protect the basic
rights, or liberties, of all people. This is the system of government that United States are base on.
The United States, Cuba, and Democracy
During the Clinton administration, the sentiment has been proclaimed on so many occasions by the
president and other political leaders, and dutifully reiterated by the media, that the thesis: "Cuba is
the only non–democracy in the Western Hemisphere" is now nothing short of received...show more
content...
If, despite this record, the United States can insist that Cuba is the only "non–democracy" in the
Western Hemisphere, we are left with the inescapable conclusion that this thing called "democracy",
as seen from the White House, may have little or nothing to do with many of our most cherished
human rights. Indeed, numerous pronouncements emanating from Washington officialdom over
the years make plain that "democracy", at best, or at most, is equated solely with elections and
civil liberties. Not even jobs, food, and shelter are part of the equation. Thus, a nation with hordes
of hungry, homeless, untended sick, barely literate, unemployed, and/or tortured people, who have
loved ones, are being disappeared and/or murdered with state connivance, can be said to be living
in a "democracy". Its literal Greek meaning of "rule of the people" implying that this is the kind of
life the people actually want –– provided that every two years or four years they have the right to go
to a designated place and put an X next to the name of one or another individual who promises to
relieve their miserable condition. But who will, typically, do virtually nothing of the kind; and
provided further that in this society there is at least a certain minimum of freedom –– how much

The Roman Republic: Democracy Or Democracy?
The Roman Republic (509 BCE – 30 BCE), one of the world's first 'democracies', was a place where
normal people could impact the government's decisions. It has always been considered a true
democracy, but as society delves deeper into the facts, was this really true? During these almost
500 years, the citizens of Rome were allowed some freedoms to impact their own society, but these
decisions were not as special to them as was thought. The Roman Republic was only half
democratic because of its constitution, the specifics of the Assemblies, and their voting methods.
The Roman Republic's constitution consisted of three different components: the Consuls
/Magistrates, the Senate, and the Assemblies. Consuls were a group of male patricians that
directed the military/government, and they were also known as magistrates. The Senate was a
group of patricians or wealthy plebeians (also known as "New Men") that passed new laws,
controlled finance, and advised their former peers, the magistrates. Finally, the Assemblies, who
will be focused on later, were a group of all adult male Roman citizens (not including slaves) who
would elect magistrates, vote on laws, and veto magistrate actions. These groups of people were
selected by the majority of people (not including women or...show more content...
Therefore, normal people can propose new laws and elect new officials, giving these citizens an
edge compared to other civilizations' citizens. In turn, this clearly shows that because of these
ordinary people's' power, the reasoning of the democratic idea is supported, and even promoted.
Ultimately, the Roman Assemblies, both Tribal and Century, back the idea that Rome is a
democracy, and prove that there is some reason to the name Roman

Essay about Democracy
Like a living organism, democracy must be born into a time where the parents, circumstances, are
right to understand the potential of such a child, democracy, and the soil, society, may be described
as the type of state that is ready to accept and nurture that child. Metaphors aside, democracy has
been noted to provide a better opportunity for human development. Democracy is also commonly
defined as a political system that is associated with free and fair elections. A democratic regime
simply refers to a system of governance that places sovereignty in the citizen's hands which allow
them to contribute to the process of decision–making through their elected officials. Democracy is
not as old as many may originally think. As recent as 1974,...show more content...
These breakdowns can occur through military action, a seizure of power by the opposition, or a
collapse of the state. When a collapse occurs, the state cannot coerce and is unable to successfully
control the inhabitants of the given territory. Diamond conveys an important reason why some
authoritarian regimes lose domestic legitimacy. The citizens of a state may not be confident in their
government when "... they fulfill their self–proclaimed missions and become redundant or when they
completely fail to do so and clearly cannot deliver," (Diamond 91). Failures of dictatorial regimes
in countries like Greece and Argentina were a result of bad economic or political performances.
Another example of authoritarian failure occurred in Africa in the early 1990s. Most African
countries were severely set back because of massive foreign debts. In order to pay back some of
these loans, many governments of these African countries would use almost four times their export
earnings leaving the government with no funds to provide basic services for its citizens. These
failures were not just economic but political as well. It got to a point where these "... authoritarian
states became too broke to buy off their opposition and too exhausted to repress them, protests
escalated," (Diamond 93). These protests had prompted not just a change in the leader, but a change
in the

Essay about elections and democracy
QUESTION 1;
1. Do you think elections can be a good measure of democracy? Discuss this statement in relation to
elections recently held in African countries you are familiar with.
INTRODUCTION
The year 2011 experienced serious levels of political activities in Africa such as political upheavals,
middle–east uprisings and elections in many countries. Most Islamic nations rose against their
long–ruling leaders, hence saw the ousted of Egyptian Hosni Mubarak and the killing of Muamar
Gaddafi after a six–month war between the Gaddafi loyalists and the anti–Gadhafi fighters assisted
by NATO. However, while this was taking place, other countries like Zambia, Congo DR, Nigeria,
Liberia were also exercising their obligation of...show more content...
DISCUSSION
From the understanding of liberty and freedoms, the government must be erected by the
participation of very free people not under coercion. It implies that the citizens must have a free
will to choose leaders of their choice and be able to have freedom of expression within the given
framework. Thus, elections become a very important voice for citizens to select their leaders as that
is how they participate in the process of making decisions .However, there is more to democracy
than just holding elections and electioneering. There are many other factors to consider to complete
democracy than just holding an election
Elections today, which signify democracy, must be judged by the conformity to standard norms that
constitute free and fair elections. A free election is based on the presumption that fundamental
human rights and freedoms are respected. These would include freedom of assembly, association,
expression, and information. In addition, freedom would include freedom from violence,
intimidation and coercion, freedom to access the polling stations by both voters and monitors, and
freedom to make choices without fear of repercussions.But in Zambia,prior to elections,there was a
lot of intimidation by the ruling MMD by brutalising the opposition,corrupting the youths with beer
to cause confusion in a way of campaigning.So there was coecion before election as opponents
were not ready to frely make their own decisions over who to vote for.
In another

Democracy: An Analysis Essay
Winston Churchill once remarked that "democracy is the worst form of government except all the
others that have been tried". In agreement with his statement, this paper will examine the problems
of democratic governments using specific examples, and compare it to the failure of fascist
governments in Nazi Germany and Italy and communist governments in the Soviet Union and China.
Theoretically, democracy is a stable form of government where power is in the hands of the people.
In a democracy, people have the liberty to elect officials that best represent their interests, and
political institutions exist as a result: Benjamin Constant argues in The Liberty of the Ancients
Compared with that of the Moderns that "true modern liberty is...show more content...
During elections in countries with corrupt governments, for example, it has to be decided whether
the guarantee of every individual's right to vote or who wins is more important. (Wong, Lecture,
October 24) Moreover, deep divides continue to exist and separate groups in democratic countries by
race, religion, language, and class, resulting in tension and, in some cases, oppression. Thus
democracy, despite its emphasis on liberty, equality and plurality, can still be problematic.
According to Andrew Janos, "the price of economic progress has been political turmoil". (Janos, pg.
21) If the Modernization Theory holds that countries tend to become more democratic the more they
modernize, then political turmoil is to be expected in democracies. Certainly this can occur in both
parliamentary and presidential systems: as Linz argues, the presidential system concentrates too
much power on the president, resulting in "winner–take–all" politics (Linz, pg. 56) and the
polarization of political parties. This is evident in the United States, where the president is elected
separately and Congress is divided between the opposing Democrats and Republicans. Conversely,
the parliamentary system in Britain, as well as that adapted by the former British colonies of Sri
Lanka and Nigeria, has had its fair share of single–party hegemony and political abuse. (Horowitz,
pg. 78) Democracy is therefore not a perfect form of government when put in practice, and much of
its

Democratic Governance Essay
Democratic Governance
Authored by
Md. Alam,
Walden University
Overview
The study of democratic governance is an effort to make a module on "Theories of Democratic
Governance and Research". For this study, one of the most popular topics "Democracy" discussed
and analyzed from the point of theoretical aspect, contemporary research, and application aspect.
Objectives
This Knowledge Area Module (KAM) looks at democratic governance. This breadth component
begins by discussing the theoretical characteristic of democracy. For this study, democratic thoughts
of Aristotle, Milton Friedman, Robert Dahl, and John Dewey will be used as guides; will find out
the different ideas about democracy. In Breadth component, theories of democracy...show more
content...
d) Democracy includes all citizens those who are able to participate in the polis.
This four categories democracy is based on equality between poor and rich. In his Politics book four
Aristotle viewed fifth democracy which is alike with previous four types but the multitude.
Finally, Aristotle presented polity– the best alternative, mixed form of oligarchy and democracy.
This polity may more incline to either oligarchy or democracy. Oligarchic polity would rule by
few selective individuals and democratic polity is operated by common people. Aristotle is a
promoter of the latter, because it involves rule by the middle class. Dewey's Democratic Ends Need
Democratic Methods for Their Realization
Democracy is a social idea to John Dewey (Cunningham, 2002). Dewey viewed people's actions
have permanent and broader effect over other people of the society. People form leaders under
political democracy to regulate the actions. When leaders imposed force to achieve private gain, the
public became defunct. Democracy is the combination of responsible sharing as per their ability and
regulating activities among the groups.
Dahl's Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy
Robert Dahl's (1989) democracy is a combination of typical and substantive equality. He describes at
least five

Democracy And Its Effect On Democracy Essay
Over the past quarter–century, democracy has stood at the center of political debate in many
countries and it is a constant concern of the political and social sciences. Since its origins in
ancient Greece, democracy was seen as a form of government where power was exercised by the
people, that is, where political decisions were made by the majority. Today,democracy enjoys great
recognition, but it is important to bear in mind that where democracy is now the preferred
constitution, we can not forget that it is not the only one that has existed. For long periods, it did not
enjoy prestige, with several authors throughout history labeling the form of government as a negative,
undesirable system. In this paper, I will examine the results that democracies may produce to come
to the conclusion that it would not be worth scrapping the democratic process, even when
democracies produce detrimental results.
Elections and parties have long been considered vital institutions of democracy. This system of
government presupposes that people can intelligently make choices for themselves and it
presupposes perfect information, democracy holds a number of preconditions. One of which is
political knowledge. Yet, political ignorance is a serious problem, one that has been studied for
centuries it still disturbingly hangs over many democracies around the world. A sizeable deficiency
in political knowledge alone has the power to weaken a system of government that is presumed to
represent the

Essay about Islam and Democracy
Discuss the argument that characterise the debate about Islam and democracy
Since the rise of the Islamic movements around the world especially in the Middle East and the
current tension between Muslim and the Western countries in particular after 9/11, the different
debates and arguments has been made by scholars, in particular Western intellectuals about the
capability of the Islam to accept the principles of democracy. I will examine the relationship between
Islam and politics, definition of Islam and democracy, the connection between Islamic teaching
(Hadith and Quran) and Islamic movements and different perspectives of Islamists or Islamic
countries. There are two different visions about the subject in which some argued that Islam...show
more content...
Islam means the submission to the will of only one God (Allah) and his command and to accept
the God's sovereignty, while you are free to choose or to refuse as the Quranic verses explained the
freedom of religion, "there is to be no compulsion in religion. Surly the right direction has been made
clear and distinct from error........" (Quran, II: 256)
The term democracy originally is a Greek word which was created from demos "people" and
kratos "rule". Abraham Lincoln defined the term democracy as the "government of the people, by
the people, and for the people". However, in our contemporary modern era there are some different
interpretations of democracy. Therefore, different kinds of democracy have been introduced such
as Greek's democracy that participation of only male allowed and excluded the slaves, women and
foreigners. On the other hand, different forms of democracy have been presented by politicians as
examples, liberal democracy, representative, parliamentary democracy and so on. Therefore, there is
not a fixed and clear definition of democracy that accepted globally.
There are various arguments about connection between Islam and

A Democratic Society Essay
A Democratic Society
Throughout time the debate upon which is the best system of government has been an ongoing
debate. Somewhere between the realms of democracy, socialism, fascism, communism, and
monarchism lies the answer to the perfect system. Traditionally speaking, North America has always
tried to remain democratic in ruling. The democratic system, unlike it's alternatives, encourages
equality and liberty among the people which in modern society, makes it the most attractive system
of government today.
Arguably, equality is the goal of many governments today. But what one must realize is that equality
cannot be reached without giving someone else inequality. While democracy influences equality,
...show more content...
Liberty is possibly the most important attribute in American and Canadian society. What people
want is the ability to make their own decisions and go about life with the freedom to do so. In a
democratic society, people are able to voice their opinions to government and ultimately play an
important role in the make up and organization of society. To a new nation, these attributes of our
society are quite attractive. Many new nations today are making the switch to democratic
government. The problem with this is that most of these nations have never been democratic before.
Therefore, new nations are having great difficulty because such a switch is not easily accomplished.
To develop a democratic society it has taken some more more than an entire century. These new
nations tend to rush the change and in the end they become frustrated because such a switch is not
as easily accomplished as thought. The features of a modern democratic state are firstly a society
dedicated to the preservation of rights and freedoms. From that, a government system must adhere to
developing a form of government which encompasses the values of a working society. In other
words, a government for the people, run by the people, and a system into which they have invested.
An excellent example of a nation that comprises the rights and freedoms of its people is Canada. As
a nation we

Democracy And Its Impact On Democracy
Democracy is a particular form of government the means, "ruled by the people". The Greeks are
widely credited for the concept of democracy, around six B.C. Many political science experts
consider the early Greek government, to be a perfect for of democracy. People had the ability to
decide various government issues, and the right to suffrage. Through out time, the concept of
democracy was established by many nations. The United States, is widely credited on making
democracy widely used around the world. The democracy we know here in the United States, was
not fully defined until the Age of Enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries, particularly during
the time the United States Declaration of Independence was implemented, followed by the U.S
Constitution. The term democracy, evolved to mean a structured government. The separation of
powers, religious freedom, provide basic civil rights, and the separation of church and state.
Modern American democracy consist of elected officials, that represents the people. Rather than,
the people represents themselves. Members of the U.S Congress (House of Representatives and
Senators) represent the people, by tackling various national issues. Since the 1950's, America has
successfully propagated the democratic form of government the states of the world. Democracy
consist of six principles: Rule of law (no one is above the law, including the creator). According to
Stephenson, Matthew. "Rule of Law as a Goal of Development

Democracy, Equality, And Equality
Democracy to me means that everyone gets a fair chance and is able to decide and vote on what
they feel is right not only for themselves but for the nation as a whole. Four main values of
democracy are liberty, justice, freedom and equality. There must be a balance between liberty and
equality so as to maintain order. In an authoritarian state, though there is peace and order, it comes
at a cost to citizens because they lose their sense of freedom and are told what to do. There is no
sense of liberty and typically one person decides what is fair, just, and equal. Whereas in a democracy
, everyone typically has a voice in what happens therefore the outcome is most equal for everyone.
When looking at education in a democratic society, it should follow the ideas of democratic
equality. The three main forms of democratic equality seen in schools are "the pursuit of
citizenship training, of equal treatment, and of equal access" (Labree). If a child is provided with
these three things during their education, they will be able to make their own responsible choices
as an adult with what path they chose to follow. On page 6 of Labree it says how a "democratic
society cannot persist unless it prepares all of the young with equal care to take on the full
responsibilities of citizenship in a competent manner." I believe the purpose of education in a
democracy is to allow equal opportunity and access to every student while teaching them how to
become responsible citizens within their

Forms Of Democracy Explained

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais de Cheap Paper Writing Service

Mais de Cheap Paper Writing Service (20)

Último

Último (20)

Forms Of Democracy Explained