Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Wastewater Management in the city of Manado, Indonesia
1. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT IN THE CITY OF MANADO , NORTH SULAWESI, INDONESIA A dissertation ( submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Technical Science ) by Markus Talintukan Lasut (AQD 017097) Asian Institute of Technology School of Environment, Resources and Development Thailand November 2007 Presentation
2. Introduction Background Problem Identification Problem Solving Rationale of the study Objective Methodology Research Approach Research framework Research design Results & Research Findings Study 1 Study 2 Study 3 Study 4 Results & Analysis Results & Formulation Objectives and considerations Strategic actions of wastewater management: a recommendation Conclusions & Recommendations: Future Challenge Presentation Outline
3.
4. Background: Manado City Where is it? INTRODUCTION Background Problem Identification Problem Solving Rationale Objectives METHODOLOGY RESULTS & RESEARCH FINDINGS Study 1 Study 2 Study 3 Study 4 RESULTS & ANALYSIS RESULTS & FORMULATION CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMEN-DATIONS
5. Problem Identification Why Manado City? Existing Situation INTRODUCTION Background Problem Identification Problem Solving Rationale Objectives METHODOLOGY RESULTS & RESEARCH FINDINGS Study 1 Study 2 Study 3 Study 4 RESULTS & ANALYSIS RESULTS & FORMULATION CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMEN-DATIONS Increasing wastes & wastewater discharge Rapid population increase Increasing economic growth Human activities Human settlement Increasing Large-& small-scale commercial enterprises Tourism & commercial buildings Population Harbour, port infrastructures Destruction of coastal ecosystem habitats & reduction of coastal resources of Manado Bay Development Policy Schematic diagram of existing situation related to problems, pressures and impacts of wastewater in coastal area in Manado
6.
7. Problem Solving ICZM Approach INTRODUCTION Background Problem Identification Problem Solving Rationale Objectives METHODOLOGY RESULTS & RESEARCH FINDINGS Study 1 Study 2 Study 3 Study 4 RESULTS & ANALYSIS RESULTS & FORMULATION CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMEN-DATIONS Schematic process of the planning and implementation in integrated coastal zone management (ICZM) (Adopted from NOAA 1995) Problem Identification Planning Research Analysis Designing Implementation Installation Operation & Maintenance Monitoring Enforcement Financing Desired product & Services Evaluation
8.
9.
10.
11. Research approach PHYSICAL PART Source of wastewater Sewer system Treatment system Receiving waters (rivers, marine coastal area) Com-munity Govern-ment Institution Scheme of research approach SOCIAL PART INTRODUCTION Background Problem Identification Problem Solving Rationale Objectives METHODOLOGY RESULTS & RESEARCH FINDINGS Study 1 Study 2 Study 3 Study 4 RESULTS & ANALYSIS RESULTS & FORMULATION CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMEN-DATIONS
12.
13. Calculated and Applied (*) Sample Size The Study Area Study Area (SA) II: Study Site (SS) 1: Molas Study Site (SS) 2: Wenang Study Area (SA) I: Manado City City level District level Research design: general INTRODUCTION Background Problem Identification Problem Solving Rationale Objectives METHODOLOGY RESULTS & RESEARCH FINDINGS Study 1 Study 2 Study 3 Study 4 RESULTS & ANALYSIS RESULTS & FORMULATION CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMEN-DATIONS 390 / 304* 100 / 139* 393 / 304* 15,848 89,424 21,337 Wenang 2 390 / 300* 100 / 145* 395 / 300* 15,498 113,443 29,025 Molas 1 Houses Indiv./ personals House-holds Houses Indiv./ personals House-holds Sample Size Number of Districts Site
14.
15.
16.
17.
18. B. Terrestrial area 1. Natural characteristics: Manado City A. Marine coastal area Study 1 : Existing Situation & Condition ( Objective 1 ) INTRODUCTION Background Problem Identification Problem Solving Rationale Objectives METHODOLOGY RESULTS & RESEARCH FINDINGS Study 1 Study 2 Study 3 Study 4 RESULTS & ANALYSIS RESULTS & FORMULATION CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMEN-DATIONS Six of 21 rivers flowing into Manado Bay are crossing through the city. Water drainage Two seasons: dry and rainy annual precipitation 2,000-2,400 mm; annual temperature: 26.11 o C. Climate 15 categories. Three largest land use: mixed agricultural (69.82%), settlement (18.38%), secondary forest (2.56%). Land use in 1999 0-8%: 12,296.50 ha (76.56%); >40%: 179.01ha (1.11%). Land slope From 10 to 650 m; types of landscape: low-lying, undulate, hilly, to mountainous. Topo-graphic elevation 16,061.08 ha Total area Bunaken National Park (BMP) Marine part Mangrove covers 1.74 km 2 (1.09%) Coastal part
19.
20.
21.
22.
23. B. Preference for solving environmental problems related to wastewater discharges (household level) 2. Community’s environmental attitude Study 2 : Status of Community’s environmental knowledge & attitude ( Objective 2 ) INTRODUCTION Background Problem Identification Problem Solving Rationale Objectives METHODOLOGY RESULTS & RESEARCH FINDINGS Study 1 Study 2 Study 3 Study 4 RESULTS & ANALYSIS RESULTS & FORMULATION CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMEN-DATIONS A: Wenang (N=304); B: Molas (N=300); ss highly significant 1 ss 1 ss 0.3 0.7 27.6 43.3 72.0 56.0 a b All parties’ responsibility; aggregated value (AV): 2 ss 2 ss 0.3 0.7 96.7 98.7 3.0 0.7 a b Community’s responsibility; aggregated value (AV): 2 ss 2 ss 0.3 0.7 94.4 94.3 5.3 5.0 a b Government’s responsibility; aggregated value (AV): ‘ disagree’ ‘ agree’ Modus No answer Percentage of answers
24. B. Preference for solving environmental problems related to wastewater discharges (Personal level) 2. Community’s environmental attitude Study 2 : Status of Community’s environmental knowledge & attitude ( Objective 2 ) INTRODUCTION Background Problem Identification Problem Solving Rationale Objectives METHODOLOGY RESULTS & RESEARCH FINDINGS Study 1 Study 2 Study 3 Study 4 RESULTS & ANALYSIS RESULTS & FORMULATION CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMEN-DATIONS 1: ‘very agree’; 2: ‘agree’; 3: ‘agree less’; 4: ‘disagree’; a: Wenang District (N=139); b: Molas District (N=145); ss high significant 2 ss 2 ss 0.7 0.7 1.4 7.6 38.8 42.1 48.9 44.8 10.1 4.8 a b All parties’ responsibility; aggregated value: 4 ss 4 ss 0.7 0.7 46.8 39.3 43.2 38.6 5.0 17.2 4.3 4.1 a b Community’s responsibility; Aggregated value: 3 ss 2 ss 0.0 2.1 17.3 14.5 59.0 33.8 20.1 47.6 3.6 2.1 a b Government’s responsibility; aggregated value: 4 3 2 1 Modus No Answer Percentage of answers Focus of questions
25. Study 3 : Status of wastewater treatment system & facilities ( Objective 3 ) 1. W astewater treatment system (septic tank) & wastewater infrastructure and facilities (sewer system) INTRODUCTION Background Problem Identification Problem Solving Rationale Objectives METHODOLOGY RESULTS & RESEARCH FINDINGS Study 1 Study 2 Study 3 Study 4 RESULTS & ANALYSIS RESULTS & FORMULATION CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMEN-DATIONS 0.7 52.7 38.0 3.3 3.0 2.3 52.8 9.8 37.4 Molas (n=300) Molas (n=163) 16.8 9.3 24.7 No info 62.2 37.0 30.9 Very good 4.9 43.9 23.3 15.1 Good 2.0 11.2 0.7 - Adequate 5.9 45.0 0.3 0.3 Poor 8.2 4.3 12.2 Very poor Wenang (n=304) Wenang (n=169) Molas (n=300) Wenang (n=304) sewer system condition septic-tank capacity per person septic-tank condition Criteria
26. 2. Factors affecting the wastewater treatment system Study 3 : Status of wastewater treatment system & facilities ( Objective 3 ) INTRODUCTION Background Problem Identification Problem Solving Rationale Objectives METHODOLOGY RESULTS & RESEARCH FINDINGS Study 1 Study 2 Study 3 Study 4 RESULTS & ANALYSIS RESULTS & FORMULATION CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMEN-DATIONS Septic tank condition Septic tank capacity Level of education Community’s knowledge of environmental issues related wastewater Not statistically significant Sosio-economic aspects & community’s knowledge
27. Study 4 : Status of water quality ( Objective 4 ) 1. Characteristics, environmental condition, and uses R: residential; RDU: residential in dense urban area; MRA: residential mixed with agricultural INTRODUCTION Background Problem Identification Problem Solving Rationale Objectives METHODOLOGY RESULTS & RESEARCH FINDINGS Study 1 Study 2 Study 3 Study 4 RESULTS & ANALYSIS RESULTS & FORMULATION CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMEN-DATIONS Transportation, Toilet, washing, bathing, fish culture, fishing, bathing R/RDU/MRA Tondano River Toilet, garbage dump R / MRA Maasing River Transportation, Toilet MRA / R Bailang River Uses Predominant land use in surrounding area River
28. 2. Pollution status a: Class II, water that may be used for recreational activities, fisheries, livestock, and irrigation (WQC-GRRI). b: Class III, water that may be used for fisheries, livestock, and irrigation (WQC-GRRI). c: Criterion for protection of aquatic life (ASEAN-MWQC). d: Criterion for protection of human health (recreational activities) (ASEAN-MWQC). Study 4 : Status of water quality ( Objective 4 ) INTRODUCTION Background Problem Identification Problem Solving Rationale Objectives METHODOLOGY RESULTS & RESEARCH FINDINGS Study 1 Study 2 Study 3 Study 4 RESULTS & ANALYSIS RESULTS & FORMULATION CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMEN-DATIONS Mercury (Hg-tot) Phosphate (PO 4 -3 ) Nitrate (NO 3 - ) BOD 5 Parameters Present study results a, b, c, d 0.081 0.024 Tondano a, b, c 2.57 1.42 Tondano a, b, c 2.26 2.18 Maasing a, b, c 1.67 1.56 Bailang c 1.83 2.13 Tondano c 1.46 2.37 Maasing c 0.93 1.49 Bailang a 4.18 12.48 Tondano a 14.11 19.34 Maasing a 5.10 14.78 Bailang Wet season Dry season Status (Exceed) Concentration (mg/l) Rivers
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43. COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT OF NORTH SULAWESI Wastewater Management Plan of Manado City Fishery Tourism Industry Settlement Others Agriculture Future Challange RECOMMENDATIONS Sustainable development of coastal ecosystem habitats and resources