This document provides guidance for a student assignment on organizational change. It outlines grading expectations, including using citations and advancing beyond basic answers. The student is advised to use concepts from the provided textbook on organizational change and at least four peer-reviewed sources. Key aspects of recognizing the need for change are discussed, including assessing readiness, developing a compelling vision, and overcoming barriers. Creating awareness of the need for change involves finding a transformational leader, focusing on shared goals, and addressing dissatisfaction with the status quo.
Building and Energizing the Need for Change Module 05/CT 03
1. Managing Dynamic Environment (Organizational Change
Issues) Module 05/CT 03
Regulations:
· GRADING EXPECTATIONS :
1. I recommend that you use the grading rubric to shape your
work product (Attached).
2. With respect to grading, The instructor really looks for 2
things: citations and substance. I encourage you to include cites
and information from scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources in
addition to the course text (Cawsey, T. F., Deszca, G., & Ingols,
C. (2020). Organizational change: An action-oriented toolkit
(4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing. ISBN-13:
9781544351407).
Otherwise, my potential for points is reduced. It indicates you
have read the course materials and searched far and wide for
theories, statistics, and facts to address the issue at hand. I
encourage you to paraphrase these sources. Convert the content
into your own words rather than using direct quotes. This
improves the synthesis of information, and it makes the writing
more closely resemble your own style.
In addition to scholarly citations, a substantive assignment is
one that not only answers the question but advances the
discussion. Please, do more than is expected.
· The writer must apply APA style guidelines And avoid
plagiarism by using your own words
· Support your submission with:
1. Course material concepts, principles, and theories from the
textbook and Use it in the references (Cawsey, T. F., Deszca,
G., & Ingols, C. (2020). Organizational change: An action-
oriented toolkit (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
ISBN-13: 9781544351407)
2. 2. At least Four scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles such
as:
2.1 Allen, J. B., Jain, S., & Church, A. H. (2020). Using a pulse
survey approach to drive organizational change. Organization
Development Review, 52(3), 62-68.
2.2 Kellogg, K. C. (2019). Subordinate activation tactics: Semi-
professionals and micro-level Institutional change in
professional organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly,
64(4), 928–975.
2.3 Metwally, D. (2019). How ethical leadership shapes
employees’ readiness to change: The mediating role of an
organizational culture of effectiveness. Frontiers in Psychology,
10, 2493.
· Be 4 completed pages in length, which does not include the
title and reference pages, which are never a part of the content
minimum requirements. Organize your paperwith section
headers related to the Critical thinking prompts
Organizational Change Issues
Change is never an easy process. For years, researchers and
theorists have attempted to develop frameworks for change to
help individuals accept the need for change. Consider the
scenario below about change in a large organization. Then,
answer the associated questions related to organizational
change.
Due to the impact of COVID-19, a large manufacturing
company recognizes that organizational culture changes are
necessary. Furthermore, process related changes must occur.
The organization has experienced a decline in sales from early
2020 to present and recognizes that if changes are not made,
many issues may arise. Reham, the CEO of the company,
recognizes that organizational changes are needed.
Reham has proposed that the company reduce the size of the
workforce by 20% until sales increase. The organization
3. currently employs many full-time manufacturing employees, but
only employs a handful of office workers. To further market the
products provided by the company, many office workers are
working 10-20 hours of overtime, per week, to assist with
marketing efforts. Needless to say, office personnel are very
overwhelmed with tasks and responsibilities.
At a three-hour meeting, Reham noted that a 20% reduction
among manufacturing employees would be made within the next
month. She then went on to state that three new positions would
be added to the home office to ensure that the workload was not
as intense for office personnel.
During the meeting, many individuals recognized Reham’s point
and said that they would support her decision to make these
workforce changes. Unfortunately, Reham’s colleague, Alan
(the Director of Manufacturing), became furious about this
change and mentioned that he did not understand why Reham
was trying to ruin the company’s culture.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following questions:
1. Why do you believe that Alan is having a difficult time
recognizing the change proposed by Reham?
2. What are the implications associated with Alan, the Director
of Manufacturing, not supporting this change initiative?
3. Although Reham is the CEO, and has ultimate authority, how
might obtaining additional feedback from other organizational
leaders assist Alan in further understanding the rationale for
this change?
4. Before Reham pushes this change forward, what short-term
and long-term impacts should she consider?
Very important Note:
To move to exceed standards, I recommend providing research
and/or evidence or examples to show your point here.
Managing Dynamic Environment (
4. Organizational Change Issues
)
Module
05
/CT 0
3
Regulations
:
·
GRADING EXPECTATIONS
:
1.
I recommend that you use the grading rubric to shape your work
product (
Attached
).
2.
With respect to
grading, The instructor really looks for 2 things:
citations
5. and substance
. I
encourage you to
include cites and information from
scholarly and/or peer
-
reviewed sources in addition
to the course text
(
Cawsey, T. F., Deszca, G., & Ingols, C. (2020). Organizational
change: An
action
-
oriented toolkit (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
ISBN
-
13:
9781544351407).
Otherwise
, my potential for points is reduced. It
indicates you have read the course materials and
searched far and wide for theories, statistics, and facts
to address the issue at hand.
I encourage you to
paraphrase these sources.
Convert the content into your own words rather than using
direct
6. quotes
. This improves the synthesis of information, and it makes the
writing more closely resemble
your own style.
In addition to
scholarly citations, a substantive assignment is one that
not only answers the question but
advances the discussion. Please, do more than is expected.
·
The writer must apply
APA style guidelines
And
avoid
plagiarism
by using your own words
·
Support your submission with
:
1.
Course material concepts, principles, and theories from the
7. textbook and
Use
it in the references
(Cawsey, T. F., Deszca, G., & Ingols, C. (2020). Organizational
change: An action
-
oriented
toolkit (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing. ISBN
-
13: 978
1544351407)
2.
A
t least
Four
scholarly, peer
-
reviewed journal articles
such as:
2.1
Allen, J. B., Jain, S., & Church, A. H. (2020). Using a pulse
survey approach to drive
organizational change. Organization Development Review,
52(3), 62
-
68.
8. 2.2
Kellogg, K. C.
(2019).
Subordinate activation tactics: Semi
-
professionals and micro
-
level
Institutional change in professio
nal organizations
. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(4),
928
–
975.
2.3
Metwally, D. (2019).
How ethical leadership shapes employees’ readiness to change:
The
mediating role of
an organizational culture of effectiveness
. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2493.
·
Be
4
completed
9. pages
in length, which does not include the title and reference pages,
which are never a part
of the content minimum requirements.
Organize your paper
with
section headers
related to the Critical
thinking prompts
Managing Dynamic Environment (Organizational Change
Issues) Module 05/CT 03
Regulations:
:
1. I recommend that you use the grading rubric to shape your
work product (Attached).
2. With respect to grading, The instructor really looks for 2
things: citations and substance. I
encourage you to include cites and information from scholarly
and/or peer-reviewed sources in addition
to the course text (Cawsey, T. F., Deszca, G., & Ingols, C.
(2020). Organizational change: An
action-oriented toolkit (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publishing. ISBN-13:
9781544351407).
Otherwise, my potential for points is reduced. It indicates you
have read the course materials and
searched far and wide for theories, statistics, and facts to
address the issue at hand. I encourage you to
10. paraphrase these sources. Convert the content into your own
words rather than using direct
quotes. This improves the synthesis of information, and it
makes the writing more closely resemble
your own style.
In addition to scholarly citations, a substantive assignment is
one that not only answers the question but
advances the discussion. Please, do more than is expected.
The writer must apply APA style guidelines And avoid
plagiarism by using your own words
1. Course material concepts, principles, and theories from the
textbook and Use it in the references
(Cawsey, T. F., Deszca, G., & Ingols, C. (2020). Organizational
change: An action-oriented
toolkit (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing. ISBN-
13: 9781544351407)
2. At least Four scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles such
as:
2.1 Allen, J. B., Jain, S., & Church, A. H. (2020). Using a pulse
survey approach to drive
organizational change. Organization Development Review,
52(3), 62-68.
2.2 Kellogg, K. C. (2019). Subordinate activation tactics: Semi -
professionals and micro-level
Institutional change in professional organizations.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(4),
928–975.
2.3 Metwally, D. (2019). How ethical leadership shapes
employees’ readiness to change: The
mediating role of an organizational culture of effectiveness.
Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2493.