Implementing a BYOD program at your school is only the beginning of a journey that should change teaching and learning. A personal device will only make a difference if the implementation includes pedagogical and curriculum review that focusses on inquiry learning and enables individualisation. This session outlines an implementation that incorporates an approach to inquiry learning through a lens of the Australian Curriculum.
Empowering student learning through sustained inquiry
1. June
Wall
EMPOWERING STUDENT
LEARNING THROUGH
SUSTAINED INQUIRY
eLearning and Library Consultant
june@junewall.com.au
@junewall
2. WHAT DOES A BYOD IMPLEMENTATION
MEAN FOR YOUR SCHOOL?
TEACHING AND LEARNING AND THE
AUSTRALIAN CURRICULUM
3. WHY ARE SCHOOLS IMPLEMENTING
“BRING YOUR OWN DEVICE” (BYOD)?
Financial
Personalisation
Link to 21c learning
Student control
The advent of the cloud and the journey to the future
(NSW Government, 2013)
Implementation routes should be reflected in developing our
teaching.
Professional learning
Pedagogy
Practice
4. EXPLORE THE IDEAS OF:
1. Inquiry learning
2.Design thinking
3.Action research
5. INQUIRY
“investigative
process that
engages students
in answering
questions, solving
real-world
problems,
confronting
issues, or
exploring personal
interests (Pappas
& Tepe 2002)
“a relationship
between
thinking skills
and content”
(Stripling 2003)
6. INQUIRY AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS
Inquiry:
requires critical and creative thinking.
should guide learners into thinking about their prior knowledge related
to the topic of interest.
is an active process.
should go beyond simply finding an answer to engage learners in
questioning, reflection, thinking about how and what they learned, and
ultimately, the next step in the investigative process.
should relate to the real world and have applications to the life
experiences of learners.
is a social experience and should engage learners in collaborative
learning. (Pappas 2009)
engages learners in constructing their own new understandings.
13. ACTION RESEARCH
Action research is ‘bottom up’ research that is
undertaken by the practitioner, or person close to
the research question, as opposed to ‘top down’
research undertaken by someone else. Action
research is regarded as a way of practitioners and
community members taking ownership of the
problem they have identified. It involves active
participation in problem-solving and decision-making
to improve practice. An essential
component of action research is that it involves
collaboration.
15. FRAMEWORKS FOR GUIDING QUESTIONS
7 Ws and H
Why, where, which, what, when, who, what if and how
KWL
What do I know?
What do I want to find out?
What have I learned?
KWHLAQ
What do I know?
What do I want to know?
How do I find out?
What have I learned?
What action will I take?
What new questions o I have?
24. Teaching the scaf folding process and then getting the students
to analyse and explain provides oppor tunities for higher order
thinking
25. PREPARING STUDENTS FOR CHANGE
Knowledge – their responsibi lity to learn
Ski l ls – how do they learn and what ski lls are needed
Attitudes – they need to want to learn in a dif ferent way
Empowerment – they need to feel they can do as needed and
have the right . . .
26. WHAT IS GOING TO BE DIFFERENT?
Self managed students
Questioning
Project Management –
Time management
Thinking about thinking and work
Choice of topic
Choice of how to represent information
27. ATTITUDES
Determine student
perspectives
Determine student needs
and wants
Link changing classroom
practice to these
28. EMPOWERMENT
LOTS of discussion with students and ar ticulation of purpose,
surveys of students
LOTS of l istening
Relationship bui lding
29. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN AS THE TEACHER?
Backward Design
Identify learning outcomes and the expectation to show have
been achieved.
Identify class structure
Identify ski lls needed
Design initial program to teach ski l ls
Integrate knowledge acquisition, ski l ls and attitudes with
curriculum outcomes
30. Core - Culture
Core – China / India
Options –
Technology etc
34. SUSTAINABLE INQUIRY LEARNING?
Deve lo p a n o p e n mi nd s et to t r y new t h i ng s a nd “ h ave a g o ”
Al low teachers to fai l and learn and then al low students to fai l
to learn
Be clear about your expectations
Prepare students for learning in a new way
35. REFERENCES AND RESOURCES
Design Thinking
ht tp://notosh.com/what -we-do/the-design- thinking-school/
Design Thinking Toolki t
ht tp://www.designthinkingforeducators.com/
Lupton, Mandy (2013) Inqui r y pedagogy and the Aust ral ian Cur r iculum.
Pr imar y and Middle Years Educator, 11(2) , pp. 23-29. Avai lable f rom
ht tp://epr ints.qut .edu.au/65829/2/65829.pdf
NSW Depar tment of Educat ion & Communi t ies (2013) Br ing your own device
(BYOD) in schools. 2013 Li terature review. Avai lable at
ht tps://www.det .nsw.edu.au/pol icies/technology/computers/mobi le -
device/BYOD_2013_Li terature_Review.pdf
Notas do Editor
Implementing a BYOD program at your school is only the beginning of a journey that should change teaching and learning. A personal device will only make a difference if the implementation includes pedagogical and curriculum review that focusses on inquiry learning and enables individualisation. This session outlines an implementation that incorporates an approach to inquiry learning through a lens of the Australian Curriculum.
Let’s take a look at your responses. Significant research conducted by Jos Elstgeest and others suggests that adults tend to respond to children’s questions with wordy questions that do not promote critical thinking skills, process skills or problem solving skills. Consider the 7 types of questions offered by Elstgeest. How is it that these questions lead children to seek out answers, to dig deeper, to revisit an activity and revise their understandings?