Cargo security

Cargo Security
Cristiane R.de Freitas Page 1 of 11

Cargo Security
Definition
Air cargo (or freight) = goods or product transported, generally for commercial gain, by
aircraft.
A bit about air cargo history
Although limited air freight services were tried prior to World War I, it was not until the end of the
war that such services were first offered in any significant way. Primarily due to the availability of
surplus airplanes and trained military pilots, most of those early commercial services were made
possible by subsidies provided by national governments, most directly by postal services. Allaz
notes that four important lessons arose from these early years of air freight services, as follows:
 Military aircraft were not suitable for commercial air service. Although the cost of
purchasing surplus military aircraft was very low, the maintenance costs, especially for
engines, were prohibitively high.
 Safe air travel during this period needed infrastructure—e.g., airfields, traffic control
systems, weather services, marshaling yards. Very little of this was in place.
 The transport of mail was the major, if not the only, source of income. From 1919 to
1939, post offices around the world provided commercial aviation companies with more
than half of their revenues.
 Commercial aviation was not a profitable business unless government subsidies or
favorable postage rates were used to prop up the service.
How the economy grows
As per IATA Air cargo transports goods worth in excess of $6.8 trillion on an annual basis. This
is approximately 35% of world trade by value. The sector itself generates nearly $70 billion
every year and is an important component of the aviation industry which collectively supports 57
million jobs worldwide.

Cargo Security
Growth in air cargo service is critical to worldwide trade and investment and for building strong
regional economic ties. Beneficiaries of increased air cargo service include manufacturers, air
carriers, and communities. Communities in particular gain the jobs and revenue that come with
increased cargo operations, especially at air cargo hubs and container ports.
For example, today, the Asia-Pacific region accounts for almost 40 percent of global air cargo
traffic. The Boeing Company’s most recent World Air Cargo Forecast projects that air cargo
markets linked to Pacific Rim economies will grow faster than other international air cargo
markets over the next two decades. In particular, Boeing forecasts an average of 8 percent
annual growth in intra-Asian air freight traffic, and nearly 7 percent annual growth for Asia-North
America routes through 2029. (Krishna R. Urs - Deputy Assistant Secretary for Transportation, Bureau of
Economic and Business Affairs - Annual General Meeting of the Global Shippers Forum - Atlanta, GA - November 16,
2011.)
In this picture we
can see a
projected 2011
international air
freight share made
in 2007.
Despite the economic and political instability in the Middle East, the region has been growing
rapidly. As the United Arab Emirates vies to diversify its economy, it is making massive

Cargo Security
investments to shift traffic hubs for cargo and passengers away from Europe to the Middle
East. Making use of liberated markets, it is gaining market share from the European carriers.
Countries such as United Arab Emirates and Qatar are investing billions of dollars in major
infrastructure developments.
Among the ambitious projects currently underway is Dubai World Central, which is expected to
become the biggest air freight hub in the world, capable of handling a massive 12 million tons of
cargo annually.
According to the International Air Transport Association’s (IATA) chief economist, Brian Pearce,
the Middle East’s growth trend is significantly higher thanprojected, with the robust oil-based
economies contributing to an increase in both passenger and cargo transport.
These market changes will probably cause cargo traffic to lean toward those emerging markets.
New cargo hubs and a stronger fleet will position the new carriers to take advantage of a strong
regional and international cargo market.
Threats to Air Cargo
Terrorism has emerged as a serious threat to the safety and security of air cargo shipping. The
threat of terrorists using air cargo as a weapon to bring down a plane was brought into sharp
focus in October 2010 when al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) attempted to ship
explosives and detonators in printer toner cartridges as cargo on both passenger and cargo
aircraft. This evoked memories of the bombing of Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie in 1988. AQAP
later boasted in its ―in-house‖ magazine that the whole plot cost only $4,200.
Following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, the entire aviation industry had to
undergo major changes.
In the United States, the Department of Homeland Security was established on November 25,
2002, by the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-296). The Transportation Security
Administration (TSA), formed in 2002 and initially part of the Department of Transportation, is

Cargo Security
responsible for all aviation security measures; in March 2003, TSA become a part of the
Department of Homeland Security.
The Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (Public Law 11-053)
require 100% screening of cargo transported on passenger aircraft within three years of the
law’s passage—i.e., August 2010. The European Union and other government entities have
imposed similar security directives to improve aviation security.
The events of 9/11 led the United States and its trade partners to re-assess and strengthen the
global cargo security regime, resulting in new protocols for tracking, screening, and inspecting
containerized imports and exports (Schmitz 2007).
The United States Government (USG) has developed a unified approach to secure business
supply chains. The Administration is working to finalize a National Strategy for Global Supply
Chain Security. We anticipate that it will be released publicly by the end of this year. The
strategy defines the U.S. approach to what is, at its core, a global issue: the safe, efficient
movement of legitimate commerce through a system that is resilient in the face of catastrophic
disruptions, whether caused by terrorist actions or natural disasters.
Though this is a U.S. initiative, once implemented, its effects will reverberate around the world.
Trade is not only important to major economies but to emerging and developing markets as
well. Kenya, for example, suffered losses of $2 million per day during the Icelandic volcanic
eruption because flowers grown there for export couldn’t reach their destination. The plot to
blow up cargo jets by concealing bombs in printer cartridges being shipped as air freight hurt
developing economies far more than developed ones. Those kinds of events – natural and man-
made – have made it much more difficult and expensive for goods to transit developing
countries which are less able to cope with such shocks to the system.
Since supply chains stretch across nations, between countries, and around the globe, the
overall goal is to work with our international partners and through the appropriate multilateral
form to promote global supply chains that:

Cargo Security
 are secure against threats that could cause large-scale death, destruction, and/or
disruption;
 are resilient in response to large-scale events; and
 maintain the expeditious and reliable flow of lawful commerce.
The United States is interested in working with the international community to enhance the
security of goods en route from point of origin to final destination.
We hope to strengthen the supply chain’s intermodal components via air, land, and sea through
three major goals:
 Preventing terrorists from exploiting vulnerabilities,
 Identifying and protect the most critical elements, and
 Bolstering the supply chain’s resiliency so that it can recover quickly.
Risk Management for cargo
Risk management focuses on identifying and implementing measures to limit exposure to risk,
or the likelihood of an event occurring with a negative or unwanted outcome. In trade, the focus
of risk management is to systematically identify imports and exports that represent the greatest
risk of noncompliance of customs laws and regulations, as well as the greatest risk to national
security and safety.
By using multiple risk management strategies, U.S. and foreign customs agencies can identify
and target those areas that pose the greatest risk, and allocate resources accordingly. U.S. and
foreign cargo security programs generally implement similar risk management strategies based
on the following: collecting data elements and detailed shipment information from a variety of
sources; analyzing and assessing risk using rules-based computer programs and customs
targeting teams; prescribing action, such as undertaking non-intrusive or physical inspection or
seizure; and tracking and monitoring the risk management process and its outcomes (Laduba
2005).

Cargo Security
In the United States, trade data and detailed shipment information are gathered from various
government data sources in the Automated Targeting System (ATS), a vast database that uses
targeting rules and criteria based on intelligence to filter through cargo data and flag high-risk
shipments. Electronic manifests submitted 24 hours prior to foreign lading allow U.S. Customs
and Border Protection to assess cargo risk earlier prior to U.S. arrival (CBU, n.d.). In addition,
U.S. cargo security partnerships such as C-TPAT and CSI aim to mitigate risk by strengthening
supply chain security in the case of the former, and by prescreening U.S.-bound cargo at foreign
ports prior to departure for the latter.
Risk management techniques allow customs to identify shipments that represent little to no risk,
and thus focus limited resources on shipments that pose the greatest risk of noncompliance. In
contrast to inspection based on a shipment’s risk profile, the aim of full inspection is either to
physically inspect or scan 100 percent of imported containers. The 9/11 Commission
Recommendations Act of 2007, signed into law August 3, 2007, mandates the scanning of 100
percent of all maritime cargo containers entering U.S. ports by 2012. Some industry observers
believe that cargo inspection based on risk management is a more practical method to balance
cargo security with the flow of legitimate (i.e., low or no risk) trade than 100 percent inspection
of imported containers (Anderson 2007). Others question the cost of implementing 100 percent
inspection, and who should pay for it (e.g., importers or exporters) (Lane 2007).
1 Risk management procedures had been used by customs administrations prior to 9/11, but their use has
expanded w ith the introduction of post-9/11 programs such as CSI and C-TPAT.
Air Cargo Security Measures
Post-9/11 security measures on air cargo have been discussed both at the national
and international level, but unlike measures for maritime cargo such measures
have not been codified under a single agreement. Prior to 9/11, the International
Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) established standards for shippers, freight
forwarders, and transportation firms to maintain the security of cargo while in
transit. The standards also included recommendations to facilitate the cross-border

Cargo Security
movement of goods. Among the recommendations established by ICAO and
outlined in the Chicago Convention are, where possible, the use of risk
management techniques over the physical inspection of cargo, the acceptance of
customs documentation in electronic formats, and the use of ―authorized importers‖
to expedite customs processing. In addition, the Chicago Convention mandates that
both airports and airlines establish security programs and that contracting states to
ICAO cooperate in matters of air cargo security (Buzdugan 2006).
More recently, the International Air Transport Association (IATA), whose
membership includes 250 global airlines, developed a list of best practices with
regard to the protection of air cargo and created an internal working group to
establish a strategic plan on air cargo security and trade facilitation (IATA 2006; and
IATA 2007). IATA initiatives emphasize all-cargo versus passenger air
transport
15
and aim to ensure that cargo security measures, such as screening
and clearance procedures, are harmonized across countries both to ensure
their maximum efficacy and their minimal interference with air transport
operations (Task Force 2007; Peck 2006).
The events of 9/11 precipitated a change in cargo security measures at national borders. Prior
to 9/11, customs authorities were responsible primarily for clearing imported goods after such
goods arrived at the border. They did so through the review of entry documentation
accompanying such goods at the time of importation and, if necessary, their physical inspection.
In contrast, the cargo security programs developed after 9/11 emphasize preshipment
examination of exports. In particular, these programs require that exporters provide customs
documentation in advance of their shipment of goods to the importing country. Such advanced
documentation assists customs authorities employing sophisticated and multilayered risk
assessment techniques to determine whether to admit goods at the border or to hold them for
further inspection.
Although advance information requirements and mandatory screening procedures can disrupt
the flow of cross-border trade, recent international conventions aim, for example, to harmonize
customs practices across countries and to require that individual customs administrations

Cargo Security
employ efficient, technologically advanced, and unburden some procedures for inspecting and
clearing cargo (De Wulf and Sokol 2005, xv).
Although cargo security programs had been in place prior to the events of September 11, 2001,
post-9/11 cargo security initiatives differ from earlier programs in three important ways. First,
although like previous programs, post-
9/11 efforts generally target the movement of illegal or dangerous cargo, their primary emphasis
is on preventing the cross-border transport of terrorist weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
Second, while earlier cargo security programs focused on the role of national customs
administrations in policing the transborder movement of goods, post-9/11 programs have
engaged private-sector supply chain participants-—from manufacturers to importers to
transportation providers—in achieving this objective. As such, post-9/11 programs offer a
more holistic approach to cargo security by recognizing both the need for cooperation between
private-sector entities and customs administrations and by acknowledging the importance of
―behind-the-border measures‖ in securing the international supply chain. Finally, whereas post-
9/11 programs have introduced new and additional procedures for screening and clearing cargo
through customs, many of these programs also contain trade facilitation components. As noted,
such components may be based on the pre-authorization of shippers the use of risk
management techniques, or the simplification of customs documentation requirements. Post-
9/11 programs therefore attempt to strike a balance between security and facilitation,
recognizing that rather than being mutually exclusive, the two objectives may be mutually
reinforcing.
Conclusion
Although post-9/11 programs have as their primary focus preventing the cross- border
movement of dangerous cargo and, in particular, terrorist-related weapons via the
international supply chain, they also contain trade facilitation measures designed to
expedite customs processing and enhance trade. Nonetheless, current cargo security
programs face certain implementation challenges that some claim may compromise their

Cargo Security
effectiveness and minimize their potential benefits to participants. Overall, however, as
many cargo security programs continue to be refined, conclusions regarding their efficacy,
their costs to business, and their effects on trade will likely change, in turn influencing the
future direction of these programs.
References
Allaz, C. The History of Air Cargo and Air Mail from the 18th Century. London:
Christopher Foyle Publishing, 2005.
Bonner, Robert. 2004. Homeland security: The U.S. and the EU are working to protect global
trade from terrorism. European Affairs. Spring.
http://www.ciaonet.org/olj/ea/2004_spring/2004_spring_15.html (accessed September 12,
2007).
Buzdugan, Maria. 2006. Existing and emerging air cargo security and facilitation issues and
concerns. http://www.tiaca.org (accessed June 20, 2007).
European Union Regulation (EC) No. 2320/2002 of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 16, Dec. 2002, Establishing Common Rules in the Field of Civil Aviation Security.
Joann Peterson and Alan Treat, for United States International Trade Commission - Journal of
International Commerce and Economics, March 2008.
Lobdell, Karen. 2007. Race for global trade security: Taking security to the next level,
presentation. 86th Annual Conference and Expo, American Association of Exporters and
Importers (AAEI), Drinker Biddle Gardner & Carton, June 18. New York, New York.
Websites:
https://www.iata.org/whatwedo/cargo/Pages/index.aspx
http://www.state.gov/e/eb/tra/rm/229216.htm

Cargo Security

Cargo security

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Mais procurados (20)

Destaque

Destaque (7)

Semelhante a Cargo security

Semelhante a Cargo security (15)

Mais de Cristiane Freitas

Mais de Cristiane Freitas (20)

Último

Último (20)

Cargo security