SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 68
BOSTON’S SHIFTING DEMOGRAPHICS
BRA Research Division
July 2015
Produced by the BRA Research Division:
Alvaro Lima – Director
Jonathan Lee– Deputy Director
Christina Kim – Research Manager
Matthew Resseger – Senior Researcher/Economist
Phillip Granberry – Senior Researcher/Demographer
Kevin Kang – Research Associate
Kevin Wandrei – Research Assistant
Interns:
Grace Riascos
Arhan Uguray
Andrew DeMatteo
The BRA Research Division strives to understand the current environment of the city to produce
quality research and targeted information that will inform and benefit the residents and
businesses of Boston. The Division conducts research on Boston’s economy, population, and
commercial markets for all departments of the BRA, the City of Boston, and related
organizations.
The information provided in this report is the best available at the time of its publication.
All or partial use of this report must be cited. Our preferred citation is as follows: Boston
Redevelopment Authority/Research Division, July 2015
For more information about research produced by the Boston Redevelopment Authority, please
contact the Research Division at research@boston.gov
Research requests can be made through the BRA Research Division’s Research Inquiries website.
2
THE PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT IS TO PROVIDE A
FACTUAL BASIS TO UNDERSTAND:
 Aggregate statistics showing historical trends that shaped the
present population
 Disaggregated statistics providing a more nuanced understanding
of these trends, and
 How these trends can shape the future
3
BOSTON’S SHIFTING DEMOGRAPHICS
OUTLINE
 What Are The Trends?
> A Growing City
> A Diverse City
> An Educated City
> A Youthful City
> Changing Households and Families
 A Growing City
> Population Growth Citywide
> Components of Population Growth
> Population Growth by Neighborhood
 A Diverse City
> Changing Racial and Ethnic Composition
> Minority-Majority City
> Changing Nativity and Ancestry Composition
> Changing Neighborhoods – Racial and Ethnic
Diversity
> Language Proficiency
 An Educated City
> Educational Attainment
> Educational Attainment by Nativity
> Educational Attainment by Gender
> Educational Attainment by Race and Ethnicity
 A Youthful City
> Breakdown of Boston’s Population by Age
> Changes in Age Groups
> Change in Median Age
> Age by Nativity and Race/Ethnicity
> Age Distribution by Neighborhoods
 Boston’s Changing Families
> Marital Status
> Household Size
> Family Types
> Children and Seniors
5
WHAT ARE THE TRENDS?
6
WHAT ARE THE TRENDS?
(1) A GROWING CITY
 Boston’s population grew by 4.8% between 2000 and 2010, marking the first time since 1970 that
Boston’s population exceeded 600,000 people
 The foreign-born population has accounted for much of the city’s population growth for the last five
decades, making immigration a key driver of Boston’s population growth
 Natural growth (births – deaths) has been mainly fueled by a high birth rate among Black/African-
American residents, Latino residents, and foreign-born mothers
 Between 2000 and 2010, Roxbury, Fenway, Allston and Downtown grew in population, and these
four neighborhoods together account for 65.2% of all growth in the city; Dorchester, Mattapan,
Jamaica Plain, Longwood and Beacon Hill all declined in population between 2000 and 2010
7
WHAT ARE THE TRENDS?
(2) A DIVERSE CITY
 Since 1970, the population of Boston became more racially and ethnically diverse with the non-
white population making up 53% of the city’s population in 2010
 Foreign-born Hispanic and Asian immigrants were major contributors to the increasing diversity of
Boston’s population
 At the neighborhood level, most neighborhoods increased their diversity index score between 2000
and 2010, with Chinatown, the Leather District, and West Roxbury making the biggest gains
 In 2013, almost 36% of Boston’s residents spoke a language other than English at home – up from
only 13% in 1980
 Despite increasing diversity between 1970 and 2010, the African American, Hispanic, and foreign-
born populations remained concentrated in a few neighborhoods
8
WHAT ARE THE TRENDS?
(3) AN EDUCATED CITY
 Boston has one of the most highly-educated populations in the country, ranking 8th among a set of
25 comparable cities
 The proportion of Bostonians with a bachelor’s degree or higher rose every decade from 6.4% in
1950 to 43.9% in 2013; while the percentage of those without a high school education fell from
53.9% to 15.5%
 Educational attainment has been increasing for all segments of Boston’s population, and women’s
educational attainment has nearly matched that of men
 However, significant educational disparities persist among different racial and ethnic groups and
among immigrants:
 60.5% of the White population has a bachelor’s degree in contrast to only 18.6% of the
Black/African American population and 15.8% of the Hispanic population
 While 49.3% of the native population holds a bachelor’s degree, only 30.1% of the foreign-
born population holds a similar degree
9
WHAT ARE THE TRENDS?
(4) A YOUTHFUL CITY
 While the nation’s median age has moved progressively higher in the past few decades, Boston’s
median age has grown much more slowly in comparison:
 The population age 0 to 4 fell from 9.5% of the population in 1960 to 5.3% in 1980, and has
remained at that level since
 The share of youth, ages 0 to 19 has been decreasing from a peak of 33% in 1970 to 21% in
2013
 The 20-34 population increased from a low of 21% in 1960 to 34% in 2013, while the 35-64
population increased to a lesser extent from a low of 27% in 1980 to 33% in 2010
 In 2013, seniors (population 65 and over) made up 11% of the Boston population – a very
stable share since 1950, suggesting that the aging population is not a growing concern in
Boston
 However, residents in the youngest cohorts – under 19 – are proportionately more Hispanic
and Black/African-American than the 20 to 34 cohort, suggesting that the college-aged
population in Boston is not representative of young residents who grow up in the city
10
WHAT ARE THE TRENDS?
(5) CHANGING HOUSEHOLDS AND FAMILIES
 Boston’s average household size fell significantly from 3.4 in 1950 to 2.4 in 1980 and remained at
that level through 2013
 The share of Boston’s population that is single, never-married, rose from 33.1% in 1950 to 56.6% in
2013, and more people are living alone – 38% of housing units have only one person in 2013, up
from 23.9% of units in 1960
 The proportion of households that are families has been falling, a trend that corresponds with the
falling share of married people and children as a percent of the population
 The share of Boston households with a person 65 years and over decreased from 22.9% in 1980 to
19.6% in 2013
 However, linguistically isolated households – households where no one 14 or older spoke English
at least very well – increased to 12% in 2010, up from 8% of households in 1990
11
A GROWING CITY
12
 Boston’s population reached its peak in 1950, with just over 800,000 residents
 Like many major U.S. cities, Boston experienced significant decline in the post-World War II era. By 1980, Boston’s
population fell to under 563,000 residents
 Since 1980, Boston’s population grew by 14%, with the 2010 Census marking the first time since 1970 that Boston’s
population exceeded 600,000 people
 Boston’s 2013 American Community Survey 1-year population estimate is 644,710 +/- 3,772
13
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 1900-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2013 American Community Survey 1-year estimate, BRA Research Division Analysis
617,594
589,141
574,823
562,994
641,071
697,197
801,444
770,816781,188
748,060
670,585
560,892
644,710
500,000
550,000
600,000
650,000
700,000
750,000
800,000
850,000
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Boston's Population (1900-2013)
Decennial Census ACS Estimate, 2013
2013
 The population growth between 2000 and 2010 (4.8%) marks the first time in the last one hundred years that the
population of Boston grew faster than that of the state (3.1%)
 Boston’s 2000-2010 growth rate of 4.8% was also the highest since 1910-1920 when the population of the city grew by
11.6% due in part to the 1912 annexation of Hyde Park
 The Boston Metro Area, defined as the MAPC region, grew by 3.5% between 2000 and 2010, a rate that was faster
than the Massachusetts average, but slower than the city of Boston
4.8%
2.5%2.1%
-12.2%
-8.1%
-13.0%
4.0%
-1.3%
4.4%
11.6%
19.6%
3.1%
5.5%
4.9%
0.8%
10.5%
9.8%
8.7%
1.6%
10.3%
14.4%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Population Growth for Boston and Massachusetts by Decade (1910 – 2010)
Boston % Change Massachusetts % Change
14
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1910-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, Metropolitan Area Planning Council, MetroBoston DataCommon, Population by Decade for the MetroFuture Region, BRA Research Division Analysis
 Boston’s population growth between 2000 and 2010 compares favorably to most Northern cities. Other cities on this list
– including Charlotte, Raleigh and Austin – benefit from their states’ liberal land annexation laws, which allow them to
expand their populations by annexing adjacent land
15
46.3%
35.2%
20.4%
10.3%
10.2%
9.4%
8.2%
8.0%
7.5%
6.9%
5.7%
5.2%
4.8%
3.7%
2.6%
2.1%
0.8%
0.8%
0.6%
0.0%
-4.6%
-6.9%
-8.3%
-8.6%
-25.0%
-30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Raleigh, NC
Charlotte, NC
Austin, TX
Portland, OR
Miami, FL
Phoenix, AZ
Denver, CO
Seattle, WA
Houston, TX
San Diego, CA
San Jose, CA
Washington, DC
Boston, MA
San Francisco, CA
Los Angeles, CA
New York, NY
Atlanta, GA
Dallas, TX
Philadelphia, PA
Minneapolis, MN
Baltimore, MD
Chicago, IL
St. Louis, MO
Pittsburgh, PA
Detroit, MI
Population Growth with Comparison Cities* (2000 - 2010)
This report’s consistent set of 25 comparison cities: the principal cities of the nation’s largest metropolitan areas, plus 3 cities whose highly educated metro area populations make them good comparisons for Boston. These
include Raleigh, Austin and San Jose.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
 Boston’s native-born population decreased from 1950 to 2000, but increased by 6.5% to 465,905 from 2000 to 2013
 In contrast, Boston’s foreign-born population has increased steadily since 1970, accounting for much of the city’s
population growth over the last five decades
16
Note: Subtotals may not exactly add to total due to differences in data sources
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1950-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2010 & 2013 1-year estimates, American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
801,444
697,938
641,071
562,994 574,283
589,141
617,594
644,710657,352
587,974
557,068
475,938 459,686
437,305 454,072
465,905
144,092
109,964
83,988 87,056
114,597
151,836
167,311 178,805
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Native and Foreign-born Components of Boston's Population (1950-2013)
Total Population Native Born Foreign Born American Community Survey Estimates
2013
 In 2010, Boston’s population was 52% female, a higher proportion than the US and Massachusetts (50.8% and 51.6%
respectively)
 Between 2000 and 2010, the female population in Boston grew by 5.3%, while the male population grew slightly slower
at 4.4%
17
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1950-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2013 1-Year American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
388,180
334,707
295,240
265,526
275,972
283,588
295,951
413,264
362,490
345,831
297,468
298,311
305,553
321,643
308,191
336,519
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Gender Component of Boston's Population (1950-2013)
Males Females ACS Estimates
2013
 Demographic growth is based on (a) natural growth -- births minus deaths -- and (b) net migration
 Natural growth in 2012 was 4,274 persons. The decline in deaths over the decade contributed to an increase in natural
growth
 Immigration also drives Boston's population growth in part because of the high number of births to immigrants - 40% of
Boston births are to foreign-born mothers
18
Source: Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston Public Health Commission Research and Evaluation Office
8,067
8,003
7,716
7,906 8,015 7,807 8,011
4,486
4,406
4,042
3,857 3,875
3,646
3,737
3,581 3,597 3,674
4,049 4,140 4,161 4,274
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Boston Resident Births and Death (2000-2012)
Births Deaths Natural Growth
 The natural population growth of the White population went from negative in 2000 to positive in 2003 and continued to
grow through 2012
 The natural population growth of the Black/African American population remained positive but decreased due to a lower
number of births
 The natural population growth of the Latino population remained high, at 1,705 in 2012
 Asian natural growth remained steady over the periods 2000-2012
19
Source: Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston Public Health Commission Research and Evaluation Office
541 508
470 448 452 441 540
1,499
1,373
1,158
1,330
1,125
1,200
1,172
1,585 1,618
1,404
1,517
1,507
1,461
1,705
-336
-194
204
297
762
916 768
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Boston Natural Population Growth by Race and Ethnicity (2000-2012)
Asian Black Hispanic White
20
NEIGHBORHOOD
POPULATION
(2010)
DORCHESTER 114,235
ROXBURY 48,454
BRIGHTON 45,801
EAST BOSTON 40,508
JAMAICA PLAIN 37,468
FENWAY 33,796
SOUTH BOSTON 33,311
HYDE PARK 30,637
WEST ROXBURY 30,446
ALLSTON 29,196
ROSLINDALE 28,680
SOUTH END 24,577
MATTAPAN 22,600
BACK BAY 18,088
CHARLESTOWN 16,439
MISSION HILL 16,305
NORTH END 10,131
DOWNTOWN 9,872
BEACON HILL 9,023
WEST END 5,423
CHINATOWN 4,444
LONGWOOD 3,785
SOUTH BOSTON WATER FRONT 1,889
BAY VILLAGE 1,312
LEATHER DISTRICT 639
HARBOR ISLANDS 535
Allston
4.7%
Back Bay
2.9%
Bay Village
0.2%
Beacon Hill
1.5%
Brighton
7.4%
Charlestown
2.7%
Chinatown
0.7%
Dorchester
18.5%
Downtown
1.6%
East Boston
6.6%Fenway
5.5%
Harbor Islands
0.1%
Hyde Park
5.0%
Jamaica Plain
6.1%
Leather District
0.1%
Longwood
0.6%
Mattapan
3.7%
Mission Hill
2.6%
North End
1.6%
Roslindale
4.6%
Roxbury
7.8%
South Boston
5.4%
South Boston Waterfront
0.3%
South
End
4.0%
West End
0.9%
West
Roxbury
4.9%
Population Share by Neighborhood - 2010
 Dorchester is by far the largest neighborhood, followed by Roxbury and Brighton
 The top eight largest neighborhoods together comprise more than 60% of the city’s total population
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
 The South Boston Waterfront saw a
residential population boom from 2000 to
2010 – 1,380 people, for a growth rate of
271%
 65.2% of Boston’s population growth
between 2000 and 2010 came from four
neighborhoods: Roxbury, Fenway, Allston
and Downtown
 Dorchester, Mattapan, Jamaica Plain,
Longwood, and Beacon Hill lost the most
population between 2000 and 2010, but all
five gained population between 2010 and
2013
21
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
POPULATION
CHANGE, 2000-2010
22
Neighborhood
Population Density -- 2013
Persons per square mile of
residential land
Percentage Change in
Density, 2000-2013
Longwood 2,337,453 31.8%
West End 299,702 -18.2%
Fenway 268,630 6.6%
Downtown/Chinatown 216,914 3.6%
North End 129,318 -4.6%
South End 122,890 -3.6%
Back Bay 115,443 -2.6%
Beacon Hill 113,743 -0.5%
Mission Hill 92,023 -5.6%
Allston 91,102 -2.0%
South Boston Waterfront 45,977 -40.5%
Charlestown 73,823 0.8%
South Boston 71,964 6.6%
East Boston 67,726 11.2%
Roxbury 49,435 -3.8%
Brighton 35,963 -16.0%
BOSTON 40,772 1.9%
Dorchester 38,532 -2.6%
Jamaica Plain 30,881 0.9%
Mattapan 27,566 -4.4%
Roslindale 23,447 3.4%
Hyde Park 17,610 4.3%
West Roxbury 13,693 7.4%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 U.S. Decennial Census, 2009-2013 American Community Survey; City of Boston Assessor’s Data, BRA Research Division Analysis
 From 2000 to 2013, Boston increased residential parcels in the city by 19,719,950 square feet, or 4.8%. Neighborhoods
like the South Boston Waterfront and Downtown/Chinatown saw greater growth, at 210% and 39.5%, respectively. Only
two neighborhoods -- Longwood (-1.4%) and Hyde Park (-0.2%) – experienced declines in residential parcels
 Boston’s white population shrank slightly (-0.4%)
between 2000 and 2010, compared to a small
increase of 1.2% nationwide
 In absolute terms, the white population grew most
in Roxbury, Downtown, the South End, Mission Hill
and Allston
 Hyde Park, Dorchester, Roslindale and West
Roxbury saw the biggest absolute declines in the
white population
23
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
WHITE POPULATION
CHANGE, 2000-2010
24
 Boston’s Black/African-American population declined
slightly (-1.6%) between 2000 and 2010, compared to
an 11% increase nationwide
 In absolute terms, Hyde Park, West Roxbury,
Roslindale, and South Boston saw the largest
increases in the Black/African-American population
 Dorchester, Mattapan, Jamaica Plain, the South End,
and Roxbury saw the largest declines
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
BLACK/AFRICAN-
AMERICAN
POPULATION
CHANGE, 2000-2010
25
 Boston’s Hispanic population increased by
27% from 2000 to 2010, compared to a 43%
increase nationwide
 In absolute terms, East Boston, Roxbury,
Dorchester, Hyde Park, and West Roxbury
saw the largest increases in the
Hispanic/Latino population
 Jamaica Plain, Charlestown and Longwood
lost Hispanic/Latino population
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
HISPANIC
POPULATION
CHANGE, 2000-2010
26
 Boston’s Asian population grew by 25% from
2000 to 2010, compared to 43% nationwide
 In absolute terms, Fenway, Allston, the South
End, West Roxbury and Dorchester saw the
largest increases in the Asian population
 East Boston, Longwood and Roslindale lost Asian
population
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
ASIAN POPULATION
CHANGE, 2000-2010
A DIVERSE CITY
27
 Boston’s White population decreased from 80% of the population in 1970 to 47% in 2010
 The share of the Hispanic/Latino population increased from 3% in 1970 to 18% of Boston’s population in 2010
 The African American population shifted from 16% of the population in 1970 to 22% of the population in 2010
 Hispanic and Asian immigration contribute heavily to Boston’s growing diversity
28
Note: 2000 was the first year the Census compiled data on individuals who identified themselves as multiracial. Those who indicated “two or more races” are included in “Other” in 2000 and 2010 in this chart.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970 -2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
79.8%
67.9%
59.0%
49.5% 47.0% 46.6%
15.8%
21.7%
23.8%
23.8%
22.4% 22.9%
2.6%
6.4%
10.8%
14.4%
17.5% 18.0%
1.3%
2.7% 5.2%
7.5% 8.9% 9.0%
1.4% 1.2%
4.7% 4.3% 3.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013
Boston's Diverse Population 1970-2013
White Black / African American Hispanic Asian / Pacific Islander Other
29
 The non-White share of Boston’s population has increased dramatically since 1950 from 5.3% to 53% in 2010
 The minority share of Boston’s population (53%) is higher that that of Massachusetts (22.6%) or the U.S. (35.3%)
Note: Prior to 1970, Hispanics may be included in either the White or non-White category. For 1970-2010, Hispanics are included with non-Whites for this analysis
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1950-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
5.3%
9.8%
20.2%
32.1%
41.0%
50.5%
53.0%
1.7%
2.4%
4.6%
7.7%
12.2%
18.1%
22.6%
10.5%
11.4%
16.8%
20.4%
24.4%
30.9%
35.3%
53.4%
24.3%
37.5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Share of Boston's Non-White Population (1950-2013)
Boston Massachusetts United States ACS Estimates
2013
30
 Since 2000, Boston has become a “majority-minority” city. The non-white population is over 50% partly due to the
growth of the foreign-born population from Latin America, the Caribbean, and Asia
 This trend continued in 2010 with the minority population making up 53% of Boston’s population or about 328,231
residents
1.4% 1.7% 1.9% 2.3% 2.2% 2.3% 2.9% 3.3%
5.3%
9.8%
20.2%
32.1%
41.0%
50.5%
53.0%
98.6% 98.3% 98.1% 97.7% 97.8% 97.7% 97.1% 96.7%
94.7%
90.2%
79.8%
67.9%
59.0%
49.5%
47.0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Boston's Minority Population 1870-2010
Total non-White population White population
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1870-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
 The Racial Diversity Index calculates the likelihood that two people randomly chosen from a geographic area are from
a different racial or ethnic group
 The Diversity Index shows that Boston and most of its neighborhoods, though not all of its neighborhoods, were more
diverse in 2010 than in 2000
 The Racial Diversity Index for the city as a whole increased from .64 to .66 between 2000 and 2010
31
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
Dorchester
Harbor Islands
Boston
Mission Hill
Roslindale
Hyde Park
Roxbury
South End
Jamaica Plain
Allston
East Boston
West End
Bay Village
Fenway
Brighton
LMA
Downtown
West Roxbury
Charlestown
South Boston
Mattapan
Leather District
Chinatown
Back Bay
South Boston Waterfront
Beacon Hill
North End
Neighborhood Diversity Index (2000 - 2010)
2010 2000
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
Based on the methodology “Mapping the USA’s diversity from 1960 to 2060” USA TODAY
RACIAL
DIVERSITY
 Racial diversity by census tract
increased dramatically in most of
Boston from 1970 to 2010
 In the maps, yellow represents census
tracts with low racial diversity index
scores, while red represents census
tracts with high racial diversity
32
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970 - 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
BLACK/AFRICAN
AMERICAN POPULATION
 In 1970, the Black/African American
population was largely concentrated in
the neighborhoods of Roxbury and
parts of Dorchester and Mattapan
(tracts colored red in the maps at right)
 In 2010 that concentration was still
evident, although the Black/African
American population had increased
throughout Dorchester, Mattapan, and
Hyde Park
Note: Maps are animated in electronic
version. See alternate static version for
hard copies.
33
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970 - 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
HISPANIC
POPULATION
• The Hispanic population has grown
significantly since 1970 with large
communities with large communities
forming in East Boston and Jamaica
Plain (colored red in maps at right)
Note: Maps are animated in electronic
version. See alternate static version for
hard copies
34
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
 Historically, Boston has had a greater proportion of foreign-born residents than both Massachusetts and the U.S.
 In 2013, Boston was home to 178,805 foreign-born people, 27.7% of Boston’s population – a higher proportion than
that of both Massachusetts (16%) and the U.S. (13%)
 In recent decades, the proportion of foreign-born residents in Boston has grown dramatically, from 12.6% in 1970 to
27.7% in 2013. However, this proportion is lower than the 36.3% peak share in 1910. The recent growth is due largely
to the passage of the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act, which ended quotas based on national origin
 Boston’s foreign-born population increased 18% from 2000 to 2013, from 151,836 to 178,805
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1850-2000 U.S. Decennial Census, 2010 1-year American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
35
34%
36%
13%
27%
17%
32%
9%
15%
10%
15%
5%
13%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
1850
1860
1870
1880
1890
1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
Proportion of Population that is Foreign-Born (1850-2010)
Quotas Policy Boston Massachusetts United States
36
 With 178,805 foreign-born residents in 2013, 27.7% of Boston’s population was foreign-born. This ranks Boston highly
when compared with other large U.S. cities
This report uses a consistent set of 25 US cities for all comparisons. See Slide 15 for more detail.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013 1-year American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
Native
72%
Foreign born
28%
Boston’s Population by Nativity 2013
Foreign-born Rank
% of Foreign -
born City
Total Population
Rank
1 56.6% Miami, FL 22
2 39.3% San Jose,CA 9
3 38.2% Los Angeles, CA 2
4 37.0% New York, NY 1
5 34.9% San Francisco, CA 10
6 28.3% Houston, TX 4
7 27.7% Boston, MA 15
8 26.3% San Diego, CA 7
9 24.4% Dallas, TX 8
10 21.1% Chicago, IL 3
11 19.7% Phoenix, AZ 6
12 18.1% Austin, TX 11
13 17.7% Seattle,WA 16
14 16.1% Minneapolis, MN 23
15 16.1% Charlotte, NC 12
16 15.2% Denver, CO 18
17 14.7% Portland, OR 19
18 14.4% Washington, DC 17
19 12.8% Raleigh, NC 21
20 12.7% Philadelphia, PA 5
21 8.3% Pittsburgh, PA 25
22 7.2% Atlanta, GA 20
23 7.1% Baltimore, MD 14
24 6.9% St. Louis, MO 24
25 5.0% Detroit, MI 13
FOREIGN BORN
POPULATION
 The percentage of the population
that is foreign-born has increased
in most census tracts in Boston
since 1970
 In the maps at right, yellow
census tracts have a foreign-born
population of less than 10%
 In the red census tracts, foreign-
born residents make up more
than 60% of the population
37
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
 In 2013, naturalized citizens made up 45.4% of Boston’s foreign-born population, a much lower share than that of 1970
but a growing share of the foreign-born population since 1990
 The number of immigrants in Boston who were not citizens was 91,158 in 2013
38
68.1%
49.8%
34.4% 37.3%
44.3% 45.4%
31.9%
50.2%
65.6% 62.7%
55.7% 54.6%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013
Boston's Foreign-born Population by Citizenship Status (1970 - 2013)
Naturalized Non-naturalized
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Decennial Census 1950-2000, 2006-2010 and 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
 Today, most of Boston’s immigrants come from Latin America, the Caribbean, and Asia. This is a dramatic change from
1970, when most immigrants came from Europe
39
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970-2000 U.S. Decennial Census and 2006-2010 and 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
25.2%
32.3%
45.1% 49.3% 50.3% 50.7%
8.0%
16.0%
21.0%
24.2%
25.3% 25.5%
63.6%
37.9%
24.2% 17.5% 14.3% 13.6%
0.6%
4.8% 3.3%
9.0% 10.1% 10.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013
Region of Origin of Boston's Immigrants
Americas Asia Europe Africa
 Boston’s foreign-born population comes from more than 100 countries. The Dominican Republic and China are the
most common countries of origin for Boston’s foreign-born population
 43.5% of Hispanics and 68.1% of Asians in Boston are foreign-born
 The top ten countries of origin represent 57% of the total foreign-born population
40
2.1%
2.5%
3.6%
3.7%
4.0%
5.5%
5.6%
9.2%
10.0%
10.7%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12%
Trinidad and Tobago
Guatemala
Jamaica
Colombia
Cape Verde
Vietnam
El Salvador
Haiti
China
Dominican Republic
Top Ten Countries of Origin of Boston's Foreign-born - 2013
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
 Self-reported ancestries reflect earlier waves of immigration to Boston from Ireland, Italy, England, and Germany
 Puerto Rican, Dominican, Chinese, Haitian, and Salvadoran ancestries reflect more recent arrivals
41
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
2%
2%
3%
3%
3%
4%
5%
5%
6%
12%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14%
Salvadoran
German
American
English
Haitian
Chinese
Dominican
Puerto Rican
Italian
Irish
Percent of Total Population
Top Ten Ancestries for Boston’s Population – 2013
 Boston’s immigrant populations cluster
together in particular neighborhoods. Boston’s
largest immigrant groups live in:
 Dominican
 Jamaica Plain, Roxbury
 Chinese
 Allston, Brighton, Downtown/Chinatown
 Haitian
 Hyde Park, Mattapan, Roslindale
 El Salvadorian
 East Boston
 Vietnamese
 Dorchester
42
Source U.S. Census Bureau,: 2006-2010 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
 Of Bostonians age 5 and over who speak a language other than English at home, 44.1% speak Spanish, up from
30.2% in 1980
 The number of Italian speakers has declined since 1980 while French Creole and Vietnamese speakers have increased
43
Source: U.S Census Bureau, 1980-2000 U.S. Decennial Census, 2006-2010 American Community Survey, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
30.2%
37.2%
40.7% 42.2% 44.1%
17.7%
8.3% 3.6% 2.2%
1.9%
10.8%
10.3%
9.5% 10.7% 10.3%
4.6%
5.6% 6.7% 6.9% 4.5%
8.7% 14.2% 14.6% 13.5% 14.6%
0.5%
3.1% 4.2% 4.4% 5.3%
27.6%
21.3% 20.6% 20.1% 19.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1980 1990 2000 2010 2013
%ofthose5+whospeakalanguageotherthanEnglishathome
Languages other than English Spoken at Home (1980-2013)
Spanish Italian Chinese Portuguese French / French Creole Vietnamese Other
 In 2010, 12% of Boston households were linguistically isolated – no one 14 or older in the household spoke English at
least very well – up from 8% of households in 1990
 Most linguistically isolated households are of Hispanic origin reflecting the growth of this population in the last decade
 64% of Boston households only spoke English at home in 2010, down from 73% of households in 1990
44
73.1%
66.6% 64.3% 64.3%
18.8%
22.7% 24.0% 24.0%
8.1% 10.7% 11.7% 11.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1990 2000 2010 2013
Linguistically Isolated Households in Boston (1990-2013)
English-only Language other than English, not linguistically isolated Linguistically isolated
Number of English-only speakers may not match previous slide due to differences in data sources
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1990-2000 U.S. Decennial Census, 2006-2010 American Community Survey, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
AN EDUCATED CITY
45
 Boston’s population is more educated than the national average, with 43.9% of residents holding a Bachelor’s degree
or higher, compared to just 28.8% nationwide
 Boston is the 8th most educated city among a list of comparable cities. The Greater Boston area ranks even higher, at
4th among major metropolitan areas, in BA share
46
City
Percent with at Least a BA,
City City Rank
Percent with at Least a BA,
Metro Area Metro Area Rank
Seattle, WA 57.4% 1 38.0% 9
Washington, DC 52.4% 3 47.9% 1
San Francisco, CA 52.4% 2 44.5% 3
Raleigh, NC 47.5% 4 42.2% 5
Atlanta, GA 46.8% 5 34.9% 12
Minneapolis, MN 45.7% 6 38.4% 8
Austin, TX 45.6% 7 40.6% 6
Boston, MA 43.9% 8 43.4% 4
Portland, OR 43.8% 9 34.5% 15
Denver, CO 42.9% 10 39.2% 7
San Diego, CA 41.7% 11 34.6% 14
Charlotte, NC 39.8% 12 30.6% 20
San Jose, CA 37.4% 13 45.7% 2
Pittsburgh, PA 35.5% 14 29.9% 21
New York, NY 34.5% 15 36.5% 10
Chicago, IL 34.2% 16 34.6% 13
Los Angeles, CA 31.1% 17 31.4% 18
St. Louis, MO 29.6% 18 30.9% 19
Dallas, TX 29.4% 19 31.7% 17
Houston, TX 29.2% 20 29.4% 22
Baltimore, MD 26.8% 21 36.0% 11
Phoenix, AZ 26.3% 22 28.7% 24
Philadelphia, PA 23.9% 23 33.6% 16
Miami, FL 23.1% 24 28.9% 23
Detroit, MI 12.7% 25 28.1% 25
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
Educational Attainment for Comparison Cities
47
 The proportion of Bostonians with a bachelor’s degree or higher rose every decade from 6.4% in 1950 to 42.5% in
2010 (43.9% in 2013 according to ACS data)
 The percentage of Bostonians with a high school diploma or some college has remained relatively stable since 1970 at
around 40-45% of the population
 The percentage without a high school education fell from 53.9% in 1950 to 15.7% in 2010
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1950 – 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2013 1-Year American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
6.4% 7.6% 10.5%
20.3%
30.0%
34.9%
42.5% 43.9%
6.6% 7.7%
8.6%
13.1%
19.1%
19.3%
18.2% 18.7%
28.9%
29.3%
35.2%
35.0%
26.6%
24.1%
23.6% 22.4%
53.9%
55.4%
45.7%
31.6%
24.3% 21.7%
15.7% 15.0%
4.2%
6.2%
7.7%
10.8%
16.2%
20.3%
24.4%
27.9%
29.6%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013
%ofPopulation25YearsandOver
Educational Attainment of Boston vs U.S. (1950-2013)
Bachelor's degree or higher Some college of Associate's degree High school
Less than high school Not reported U.S. Bachelor's degree or higher
48
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970 - 2000 U.S. Decennial Census, 1990 Public Use Microdata Sample, 2010 & 2013 1-Year American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
 The gender gap in educational attainment for Bachelor’s degree or higher diminished from 5.4 percentage points in
1970 to 1.4 percentage points in 2010
 The gender gap in 2013 stood at just 0.4 percentage points. Notably, the proportion of females holding graduate or
professional degrees was higher than males in 2013: 21.3% of females in Boston had a professional or advanced
degree, compared to 19.3% of males
 In the future, women’s educational attainment may surpass that of men since women make up 55.5% of Boston
residents enrolled in college or graduate school
13.3%
24.7%
32.8%
36.6%
43.2%
7.9%
16.6%
26.9%
33.4%
41.8%
45.4%
45.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Population 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
Male
Female
Male, ACS
Female, ACS
2013
49
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1980-2000 U.S. Census, 2006-2010 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
 Educational attainment has been
increasing for all racial/ethnic groups in
Boston
 However, significant disparities in
educational attainment between
racial/ethnic groups still exist
 For example, 60.5% of the White
population, but only 15.8% of the Hispanic
population, had a bachelor’s degree or
higher in 2010
 The Asian population of Boston is bimodal:
49% has a bachelor’s degree or higher, but
24.9% has less than a high school
education
23.2%
60.5%
8.7%
18.6%
10.3%
15.8%
21.1%
49.0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
1980 1990 2000 2010
Population 25+ with Bachelor's Degree or
Higher
White Black/African-American Hispanic Asian
28.0%
6.5%
37.6%
19.7%
55.7%
34.5%
49.0%
24.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
1980 1990 2000 2010
Population 25+ with less than High School
Education
White Black/African-American Hispanic Asian
50
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1980-2000 U.S. Decennial Census, 2006-2010 American Community Survey, Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), BRA Research Division Analysis
 The educational attainment of both the
native- and foreign-born populations
has been increasing over time
 However, the foreign-born population
has significantly lower levels of
educational attainment than the native-
born population
21.8%
32.3%
39.8%
49.3%
11.6%
20.7%
26.5%
30.1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
1980 1990 2000 2010
Population 25+ with Bachelor's Degree or
Higher
Native Foreign born
27.1%
20.3%
15.6%
9.5%
50.9%
38.2%
34.1%
27.6%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
1980 1990 2000 2010
Population 25+ with less than High School
Education
Native Foreign born
A YOUTHFUL CITY
51
52
 The median age in Massachusetts and the U.S. has risen significantly since 1970
 Boston has maintained a more youthful population, and its median age has only risen from 28.1 in 1970 to 30.8 in 2010
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1950-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2013 1-Year American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
32.6
32.9
28.1
28.9
30.4
31.1 30.8
32.8
32.1
29.5
31.2
33.4
36.5
39.1
30.2
29.5
28.1
30.0
32.9
35.3
31.7
39.1
39.4
37.2
37.5
25
27
29
31
33
35
37
39
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Median Age in Boston/MA/US (1950-2013)
Boston Masachusetts U.S. ACS Estimates
2013
53
 The percentage of Boston’s population that is age 0 to 19 has been decreasing to 21.4% in 2013
 The population between 20 and 34 has been increasing to 34.3% in 2013
 The 35-64 population had a 33.8% share in 2013
 The population 65 and over was 10.6% of Boston’s population in 2013
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1950-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2013 1-Year American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
28.9% 32.1% 33.3%
26.9% 23.3% 24.1% 22.0% 21.4%
24.6% 20.6%
24.4% 33.5%
36.3% 33.1% 35.0% 34.3%
36.8% 35.1%
29.5% 27.0% 28.9% 32.4% 33.0% 33.8%
9.7% 12.3% 12.8% 12.7% 11.5% 10.4% 10.1% 10.6%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013
Age Distribution of Boston's Population (1950-2013)
0-19 20-34 35-64 65 and over
 The 0-4 and 5-14 populations declined during the 1970s, but have stabilized since 1980 at approximately 5% and 9% of
the population, respectively
 Since 1950, the population of Boston age 20 to 34 has grown dramatically as a share of the population. In absolute
terms, it increased from 197,007 in 1950 to 216,213 in 2010
 Boston has the highest concentration of young adults (20 to 34) among 25 comparable cities
54
This report uses a consistent set of 25 US cities for all comparisons. See Slide 15 for more detail.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1950-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2013 American Community Survey 1-year estimate, BRA Research Division Analysis
2013
8.9% 9.5%
7.8%
5.4%
13.3% 16.0%
11.2%
6.8%
7.4%
9.5%
9.9%
7.4%
24.6%
20.6%
36.3%
33.1%
5.4%
8.5%
7.4%
34.3%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Changes in 34 and Under Population (1950-2013)
0 to 4 years 5 to 14 years 15 to 19 years 20 to 34 years ACS Estimates
55
 In 2009, the population aged 20 to 34
increased substantially compared to
earlier years
 Boston’s population pyramid consistently
demonstrates a low dependency ratio,
meaning the working-aged population is
comparatively larger than the population
of children and retirees
 Note: Maps are animated in electronic
version. See alternate static version for
hard copies
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1990-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2005-2013 American Community Survey 1-year estimates, BRA Research Division Analysis
56
0-19 POPULATION
 In 2013, there were 136,998 children aged 0-
19 in Boston, making up 21.4% of the
population – compared to 23.7% population
share in the greater Boston region
 The 0-19 population is racially diverse, with
almost equal numbers of White,
Black/African-American, and Hispanic youth
 Almost 90% of Boston youth are native-born,
but close to half live with at least one foreign-
born parent
 Of the approximately 77,200 school age
children in Boston, 74% attend Boston Public
Schools
 86% of BPS students are Black/African-
American, Hispanic, or Asian
 44% of BPS students speak a language other
than English as their first language, and 29%
of BPS students are Limited English Proficient
(LEP) or ELL (English Language Learners)
Native
90%
Foreign
born
10%
Nativity of Boston's 0-19 Population
Note: Youth living with a foreign-born parent is for ages 0-17 due to data availability.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, Boston Public Schools at a Glance 2014-2015, BRA Research Division Analysis
White
30%
Black/African-
American
29%
Hispanic
27%
Asian
8%
Other
6%
Racial/Ethnic Composition of Boston's 0-19 Population
57
20-34 POPULATION
 In 2013, there were 219,717 young
adults aged 20-34 in Boston, making
up 34% of the population – compared
to 22.7% population share in the
greater Boston region
 56% of 20-34 year olds are White, non-
Hispanic and 77% are native born
 According to 2010 Census data,
Boston had the highest percentage of
20-34 year olds of 25 comparable cities
 2/3 of 18-24 year olds in Boston were
enrolled in college or graduate school
in 2013
 80.9% of 20-34 year olds were single,
never-married in 2013
 In 2009-2013 data, 82,834 Boston
residents were undergraduate
students, and 28,631 were graduate
students
White
56%
Black/African-
American
16%
Hispanic
15%
Asian
10%
Other
3%
Racial/Ethnic Composition of Boston's 20-34 Population
Native
77%
Foreign born
23%
Nativity of Boston's 20-34 Population
This report uses a consistent set of 25 US cities for all comparisons. See Slide 15 for more detail.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), BRA Research Division Analysis
58
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, Public Use Microdata Sample,( PUMS), BRA Research Division Analysis
White
45%
Black/African-
American
26%
Hispanic
17%
Asian
9%
Other
3%
Racial/Ethnic Composition of Boston's 35-64 Population
Native
62%
Foreign born
38%
Nativity of Boston's 35-64 Population
35-64 POPULATION
 In 2013, there were 216,911 adults aged 35-64 in
Boston, making up 34% of the population –
compared to a 40.1% population share in the greater
Boston region
 The 35-64 share of the population has been growing
since a low of 27% in 1980
 Less than half (45%) of this age group is White, non-
Hispanic
 38% of 35-64 year olds are foreign-born
59
 In 2013, there were 67,883 seniors in Boston,
making up 11% of the population – compared to a
13.6% population share in the greater Boston region
 About 80% of the 65+ population is Black/African-
American or White, with smaller Hispanic and Asian
populations
 35.3% of the 65+ population is foreign-born
 In 2013, 26.4% of the 65 and over population spoke
English less than very well
 41.9% of those 65 and over were disabled in 2013
 38.8% live alone, and 5.3% live in group quarters
(such as nursing homes)
 In 2013, 90.7% of the 65+ population reported living
in the same house 1 year ago
 Among the 9.3% who moved to a new home, the
vast majority (8.1%) lived elsewhere in
Massachusetts in the prior year
Native
65%
Foreign born
35%
Nativity of Boston's 65+ Population
White
57%
Black/African-
American
24%
Hispanic
10%
Asian
9%
Racial/Ethnic Composition of Boston's 65+ Population
65+ POPULATION
Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2013 American Community Survey, Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), BRA Research Division Analysis
BOSTON’S CHANGING HOUSEHOLDS
60
 Households are made up of one or more persons (unrelated individuals or families) sharing a housing unit
 Boston’s average household size fell significantly from 3.4 in 1950 to 2.4 in 1980 and remained steady through 2010
 Since 1950, Boston’s average household size has been lower than that of the U.S. and the greater Boston region
61
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1950-2000 U.S. Decennial Census, 2006-2010 American Community Survey, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
3.4
3.0
2.8
2.4 2.4
2.3 2.3
3.4
3.3
3.1
2.7
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.4
2.7
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3
3.2
3.4
3.6
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Average Household Size (1950-2013)
Boston USA ACS Estimates
2013
62
2.86
2.84
2.83
2.82
2.66
2.51
2.43
2.39
2.34
2.29
2.18
2.11
2.06
1.93
1.88
1.77
1.69
1.67
1.63
1.62
1.56
1.55
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Dorchester
Mattapan
East Boston
Hyde Park
Roslindale
Roxbury
Mission Hill
Jamaica Plain
West Roxbury
Allston
South Boston
Charlestown
Brighton
South End
South Boston Waterfront
Downtown
North End
Beacon Hill
Back Bay
Fenway
Longwood
West End
Average Household Size by Neighborhood (2013)
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
 Boston’s neighborhoods vary by average household size. In 2013, Dorchester, Mattapan, East Boston and Hyde Park
had the highest average household sizes, while Back Bay, Fenway, Longwood and the West End had the lowest
63
 The share of Boston’s population that is single, never-married, has been rising from 33.1% in 1950 to 56.4% in 2010 –
considerably higher than the national share
 The percentage of Boston’s population that is married has been falling proportionately, from 55.4% in 1950 to 31.9% in
2010
Note: Age 14+ for 1950-1970; Age 15+ for 1980-2010. Separated is included in married for 1950, 2000, & 2010.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Decennial Census 1950-2000, 2006-2010 American Community Survey, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis.
33.1% 33.5%
39.5%
47.2%
50.9%
50.5%
56.4%
56.6%
55.4% 51.2%
43.4%
33.9%
31.7%
36.6%
31.9% 31.4%
11.5% 15.3% 17.1% 18.9% 17.4%
12.9% 11.7% 12.0%
23.1%
22.1%
25.4% 26.3% 26.9%
27.1%
31.0%
33.1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013
%of14/15+Population
Marital Status of Boston's Population (1950-2013)
Boston Single Boston Married Boston Widowed or Divorced U.S. Single
64
 More people are living alone, and the average household size declined between 1960 and 1980
 Only 32.4% of households have more than 2 people in 2013, down from 49.3% in 1960
Note: The slides on household and family composition begin in the year of first available data.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1960-2010 U.S. Decennial Census; 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
23.9%
28.9%
36.8% 35.5% 37.1% 37.7% 38.0%
26.8%
28.7%
29.0% 29.5% 29.6% 31.1% 31.4%
17.3%
15.1%
13.9% 14.9% 14.3%
14.9% 14.7%
13.4%
10.9%
9.3% 10.3% 9.8%
9.8% 9.8%
8.9% 6.9%
5.4% 5.4% 5.3%
4.1% 3.8%9.6% 9.5%
5.6% 4.5% 3.9% 2.3% 2.4%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013
OccupiedHousingUnits
Boston Households by Number of People (1960-2013)
1 person in unit 2 persons 3 persons 4 persons 5 persons 6 or more persons
65
 A family or family household consists of a householder living with one or more other people related to the householder
by birth, marriage, or adoption
 The percentage of Boston households that are families has been consistently lower than the national average
 This trend corresponds with the falling percentage of Boston residents who are married, and the falling share of
children as a percentage of the population
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
64.8%
53.3%
50.7%
48.1%
46.0%
77.4%
67.7%
64.0%
61.5%
60.0%
80.3%
73.2%
70.2%
68.1%
66.8%
47.2%
60.8%
66.4%
40%
45%
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
%ofTotalHouseholds
Family Households (1970-2013)
Boston Greater Boston area United States ACS Estimates
2013
66
 The percentage of family households that were headed by a married couple fell from 1970 to 1990. Since 1990, a little
over half of family households have included a married couple
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
72.5%
63.0%
58.6% 57.1% 55.5% 55.7%
4.9%
6.6%
8.3% 8.7% 9.0% 9.1%
22.6%
30.4% 33.1% 34.2% 35.5% 35.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013
Family Households by Family Type (1970-2013)
Married Unmarried Male Householder Unmarried Female Householder
67
 The percentage of Boston households that include at least one person under age 18 has been falling and remains
below national and regional levels
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
31.6%
27.0%
24.8% 25.6%
22.9%
41.5%
33.0%
29.1%
30.7% 30.3%
44.1%
37.9%
33.6%
36.0%
33.5%
23.6%
29.8%
32.9%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Households with Children under 18 (1970-2013)
Boston MAPC Region United States ACS Estimates
2013
68
 Boston has a smaller percentage of households with a person over age 65 than either the Greater Boston region or the
nation
 In 2013, 38.8% of Boston residents 65 and over lived in a single-person household
 52.7% of Boston seniors lived in family households in 2013 and 8.0% of them lived with a son or daughter
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
18.9% 19.0%
19.6%
24.1% 23.6%
25.2%
23.4%
24.0%
25.5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
2000 2010 2013
%ofallhouseholds
Households with person over age 65
Boston Greater Boston region United States

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Q1 2023 Investor Conference Call Presentation
Q1 2023 Investor Conference Call PresentationQ1 2023 Investor Conference Call Presentation
Q1 2023 Investor Conference Call PresentationBayer
 
Role of Conversational AI and Virtual Voice Assistants in Cardiology: What is...
Role of Conversational AI and Virtual Voice Assistants in Cardiology: What is...Role of Conversational AI and Virtual Voice Assistants in Cardiology: What is...
Role of Conversational AI and Virtual Voice Assistants in Cardiology: What is...JAI NAHAR, MD MBA
 
CW1 - Pret A Manger
CW1 - Pret A MangerCW1 - Pret A Manger
CW1 - Pret A MangerBarry Stuck
 
Germany Oncology Market Analysis
Germany Oncology Market AnalysisGermany Oncology Market Analysis
Germany Oncology Market AnalysisInsights10
 
Marketing Strategy for a medical device company
Marketing Strategy for a medical device companyMarketing Strategy for a medical device company
Marketing Strategy for a medical device companysaurabhmalani
 
[해외영업실] tmon media mix ad 1905_ver. 7.1
[해외영업실] tmon media mix ad 1905_ver. 7.1[해외영업실] tmon media mix ad 1905_ver. 7.1
[해외영업실] tmon media mix ad 1905_ver. 7.1TMON Ads
 
Communicating customer value & integrated communicating strategy
Communicating customer value & integrated communicating strategyCommunicating customer value & integrated communicating strategy
Communicating customer value & integrated communicating strategyMaliha Jahan
 
Digital Marketing in Pharma (India)
Digital Marketing in Pharma (India)Digital Marketing in Pharma (India)
Digital Marketing in Pharma (India)Gurpinder Singh
 
Colgate plax_Brand extension analysis
Colgate plax_Brand extension analysisColgate plax_Brand extension analysis
Colgate plax_Brand extension analysisSameer Mathur
 
Food Manufacturing Industry Transformation Map
Food Manufacturing Industry Transformation MapFood Manufacturing Industry Transformation Map
Food Manufacturing Industry Transformation MapSPRING Singapore
 
Bayer HealthCare Overview
Bayer HealthCare OverviewBayer HealthCare Overview
Bayer HealthCare Overviewbhcbelgium
 
Sales Tracker | FieldAssist
Sales Tracker | FieldAssistSales Tracker | FieldAssist
Sales Tracker | FieldAssistFieldAssist1
 
Artificial Intelligence - Potential Game Changer for Medical Technology Compa...
Artificial Intelligence - Potential Game Changer for Medical Technology Compa...Artificial Intelligence - Potential Game Changer for Medical Technology Compa...
Artificial Intelligence - Potential Game Changer for Medical Technology Compa...CitiusTech
 
Chap01 An Introduction To Integrated Marketing Communications
Chap01  An Introduction To Integrated Marketing CommunicationsChap01  An Introduction To Integrated Marketing Communications
Chap01 An Introduction To Integrated Marketing CommunicationsPhoenix media & event
 

Mais procurados (19)

Q1 2023 Investor Conference Call Presentation
Q1 2023 Investor Conference Call PresentationQ1 2023 Investor Conference Call Presentation
Q1 2023 Investor Conference Call Presentation
 
Role of Conversational AI and Virtual Voice Assistants in Cardiology: What is...
Role of Conversational AI and Virtual Voice Assistants in Cardiology: What is...Role of Conversational AI and Virtual Voice Assistants in Cardiology: What is...
Role of Conversational AI and Virtual Voice Assistants in Cardiology: What is...
 
CW1 - Pret A Manger
CW1 - Pret A MangerCW1 - Pret A Manger
CW1 - Pret A Manger
 
Mayo AI CAI final.pptx
Mayo AI CAI final.pptxMayo AI CAI final.pptx
Mayo AI CAI final.pptx
 
Germany Oncology Market Analysis
Germany Oncology Market AnalysisGermany Oncology Market Analysis
Germany Oncology Market Analysis
 
Marketing Strategy for a medical device company
Marketing Strategy for a medical device companyMarketing Strategy for a medical device company
Marketing Strategy for a medical device company
 
[해외영업실] tmon media mix ad 1905_ver. 7.1
[해외영업실] tmon media mix ad 1905_ver. 7.1[해외영업실] tmon media mix ad 1905_ver. 7.1
[해외영업실] tmon media mix ad 1905_ver. 7.1
 
Market Access
Market AccessMarket Access
Market Access
 
Communicating customer value & integrated communicating strategy
Communicating customer value & integrated communicating strategyCommunicating customer value & integrated communicating strategy
Communicating customer value & integrated communicating strategy
 
Digital Marketing in Pharma (India)
Digital Marketing in Pharma (India)Digital Marketing in Pharma (India)
Digital Marketing in Pharma (India)
 
Colgate plax_Brand extension analysis
Colgate plax_Brand extension analysisColgate plax_Brand extension analysis
Colgate plax_Brand extension analysis
 
Food Manufacturing Industry Transformation Map
Food Manufacturing Industry Transformation MapFood Manufacturing Industry Transformation Map
Food Manufacturing Industry Transformation Map
 
Bayer HealthCare Overview
Bayer HealthCare OverviewBayer HealthCare Overview
Bayer HealthCare Overview
 
Sales Tracker | FieldAssist
Sales Tracker | FieldAssistSales Tracker | FieldAssist
Sales Tracker | FieldAssist
 
Artificial Intelligence - Potential Game Changer for Medical Technology Compa...
Artificial Intelligence - Potential Game Changer for Medical Technology Compa...Artificial Intelligence - Potential Game Changer for Medical Technology Compa...
Artificial Intelligence - Potential Game Changer for Medical Technology Compa...
 
14 dagmar n advertising effectiveness measurement
14 dagmar n advertising effectiveness measurement14 dagmar n advertising effectiveness measurement
14 dagmar n advertising effectiveness measurement
 
q2-2022-investor-presentation.pdf
q2-2022-investor-presentation.pdfq2-2022-investor-presentation.pdf
q2-2022-investor-presentation.pdf
 
Basic of Advertising
Basic of AdvertisingBasic of Advertising
Basic of Advertising
 
Chap01 An Introduction To Integrated Marketing Communications
Chap01  An Introduction To Integrated Marketing CommunicationsChap01  An Introduction To Integrated Marketing Communications
Chap01 An Introduction To Integrated Marketing Communications
 

Semelhante a Boston's Shifting Demographics

Peter Meade Chamber May 2013
Peter Meade Chamber May 2013Peter Meade Chamber May 2013
Peter Meade Chamber May 2013bostonredevelop
 
Austin Tx Demographics - Census 2010
Austin Tx Demographics - Census 2010Austin Tx Demographics - Census 2010
Austin Tx Demographics - Census 2010Kristen Carney
 
The importance of Immigrants to Boston's Continued Prosperity
The importance of Immigrants to Boston's Continued ProsperityThe importance of Immigrants to Boston's Continued Prosperity
The importance of Immigrants to Boston's Continued ProsperityInstituto Diáspora Brasil (IDB)
 
The Importance of Immigrants to Boston's Continued prosperity
The Importance of Immigrants to Boston's Continued prosperityThe Importance of Immigrants to Boston's Continued prosperity
The Importance of Immigrants to Boston's Continued prosperityInstituto Diáspora Brasil (IDB)
 
Our Shared Future: Charting a Path for Immigrant Advancement in a New Politic...
Our Shared Future: Charting a Path for Immigrant Advancement in a New Politic...Our Shared Future: Charting a Path for Immigrant Advancement in a New Politic...
Our Shared Future: Charting a Path for Immigrant Advancement in a New Politic...Instituto Diáspora Brasil (IDB)
 
Briefing Book: Demographic profile of the Foreign-Born in Boston
Briefing Book: Demographic profile of the Foreign-Born in BostonBriefing Book: Demographic profile of the Foreign-Born in Boston
Briefing Book: Demographic profile of the Foreign-Born in BostonInstituto Diáspora Brasil (IDB)
 
Powering Greater Boston's Economy - Why the Latino Community Is Critical to o...
Powering Greater Boston's Economy - Why the Latino Community Is Critical to o...Powering Greater Boston's Economy - Why the Latino Community Is Critical to o...
Powering Greater Boston's Economy - Why the Latino Community Is Critical to o...Instituto Diáspora Brasil (IDB)
 
Regional Snapshot: Metro Atlanta's Hispanic and Latino Community
Regional Snapshot: Metro Atlanta's Hispanic and Latino CommunityRegional Snapshot: Metro Atlanta's Hispanic and Latino Community
Regional Snapshot: Metro Atlanta's Hispanic and Latino CommunityARCResearch
 

Semelhante a Boston's Shifting Demographics (20)

Boston by the Numbers
Boston by the Numbers Boston by the Numbers
Boston by the Numbers
 
Boston by the Numbers: Population - Past and Future
Boston by the Numbers:  Population - Past and Future Boston by the Numbers:  Population - Past and Future
Boston by the Numbers: Population - Past and Future
 
Boston's Equity Challenges
Boston's Equity ChallengesBoston's Equity Challenges
Boston's Equity Challenges
 
Poverty and Inequality in Boston - 2015
Poverty and Inequality in Boston - 2015Poverty and Inequality in Boston - 2015
Poverty and Inequality in Boston - 2015
 
Peter Meade Chamber May 2013
Peter Meade Chamber May 2013Peter Meade Chamber May 2013
Peter Meade Chamber May 2013
 
Austin Tx Demographics - Census 2010
Austin Tx Demographics - Census 2010Austin Tx Demographics - Census 2010
Austin Tx Demographics - Census 2010
 
The importance of Immigrants to Boston's Continued Prosperity
The importance of Immigrants to Boston's Continued ProsperityThe importance of Immigrants to Boston's Continued Prosperity
The importance of Immigrants to Boston's Continued Prosperity
 
Foreign Born in Boston
Foreign Born in BostonForeign Born in Boston
Foreign Born in Boston
 
The Importance of Immigrants to Boston's Continued prosperity
The Importance of Immigrants to Boston's Continued prosperityThe Importance of Immigrants to Boston's Continued prosperity
The Importance of Immigrants to Boston's Continued prosperity
 
Our Shared Future: Charting a Path for Immigrant Advancement in a New Politic...
Our Shared Future: Charting a Path for Immigrant Advancement in a New Politic...Our Shared Future: Charting a Path for Immigrant Advancement in a New Politic...
Our Shared Future: Charting a Path for Immigrant Advancement in a New Politic...
 
Boston by the Numbers
Boston by the NumbersBoston by the Numbers
Boston by the Numbers
 
New Bostonians 2009
New Bostonians 2009New Bostonians 2009
New Bostonians 2009
 
Briefing Book: Demographic profile of the Foreign-Born in Boston
Briefing Book: Demographic profile of the Foreign-Born in BostonBriefing Book: Demographic profile of the Foreign-Born in Boston
Briefing Book: Demographic profile of the Foreign-Born in Boston
 
Foreign Born in Boston
Foreign Born in BostonForeign Born in Boston
Foreign Born in Boston
 
Latinos in Boston
Latinos in BostonLatinos in Boston
Latinos in Boston
 
Powering Greater Boston's Economy - Why the Latino Community Is Critical to o...
Powering Greater Boston's Economy - Why the Latino Community Is Critical to o...Powering Greater Boston's Economy - Why the Latino Community Is Critical to o...
Powering Greater Boston's Economy - Why the Latino Community Is Critical to o...
 
Boston's Latino Population
Boston's Latino PopulationBoston's Latino Population
Boston's Latino Population
 
Regional Snapshot: Metro Atlanta's Hispanic and Latino Community
Regional Snapshot: Metro Atlanta's Hispanic and Latino CommunityRegional Snapshot: Metro Atlanta's Hispanic and Latino Community
Regional Snapshot: Metro Atlanta's Hispanic and Latino Community
 
The Diversity Explosion
The Diversity ExplosionThe Diversity Explosion
The Diversity Explosion
 
Boston by the Numbers - Foreign Born - 2012
Boston by the Numbers - Foreign Born - 2012Boston by the Numbers - Foreign Born - 2012
Boston by the Numbers - Foreign Born - 2012
 

Mais de Instituto Diáspora Brasil (IDB)

O Voto do Brasileiro no Exterior e a Necessidade de Uma Reforma Eleitoral
O Voto do Brasileiro no Exterior e a Necessidade de Uma Reforma EleitoralO Voto do Brasileiro no Exterior e a Necessidade de Uma Reforma Eleitoral
O Voto do Brasileiro no Exterior e a Necessidade de Uma Reforma EleitoralInstituto Diáspora Brasil (IDB)
 
A Diaspora Brasileira e o Governo Lula: Um Framework Transnacional para Pens...
A Diaspora Brasileira e o  Governo Lula: Um Framework Transnacional para Pens...A Diaspora Brasileira e o  Governo Lula: Um Framework Transnacional para Pens...
A Diaspora Brasileira e o Governo Lula: Um Framework Transnacional para Pens...Instituto Diáspora Brasil (IDB)
 
Brasileiros nos Estados Unidos e em Massachusetts: Um Perfil Demográfico e Ec...
Brasileiros nos Estados Unidos e em Massachusetts: Um Perfil Demográfico e Ec...Brasileiros nos Estados Unidos e em Massachusetts: Um Perfil Demográfico e Ec...
Brasileiros nos Estados Unidos e em Massachusetts: Um Perfil Demográfico e Ec...Instituto Diáspora Brasil (IDB)
 
Do “brain drain” às redes científicas globais.pptx
Do “brain drain” às redes científicas globais.pptxDo “brain drain” às redes científicas globais.pptx
Do “brain drain” às redes científicas globais.pptxInstituto Diáspora Brasil (IDB)
 
The Immigration Debate: A Racial Project 1608 - 2023race cam.pptx
The Immigration Debate: A Racial Project 1608 - 2023race cam.pptxThe Immigration Debate: A Racial Project 1608 - 2023race cam.pptx
The Immigration Debate: A Racial Project 1608 - 2023race cam.pptxInstituto Diáspora Brasil (IDB)
 
Imigração Transnacional: Um Novo Modo de (Re)Integração
Imigração Transnacional: Um Novo Modo de (Re)IntegraçãoImigração Transnacional: Um Novo Modo de (Re)Integração
Imigração Transnacional: Um Novo Modo de (Re)IntegraçãoInstituto Diáspora Brasil (IDB)
 
Anegepe - Apresentação do Lvro Brasileiros nos Estados Unidos
Anegepe - Apresentação do Lvro Brasileiros nos Estados UnidosAnegepe - Apresentação do Lvro Brasileiros nos Estados Unidos
Anegepe - Apresentação do Lvro Brasileiros nos Estados UnidosInstituto Diáspora Brasil (IDB)
 

Mais de Instituto Diáspora Brasil (IDB) (20)

O Voto do Brasileiro no Exterior e a Necessidade de Uma Reforma Eleitoral
O Voto do Brasileiro no Exterior e a Necessidade de Uma Reforma EleitoralO Voto do Brasileiro no Exterior e a Necessidade de Uma Reforma Eleitoral
O Voto do Brasileiro no Exterior e a Necessidade de Uma Reforma Eleitoral
 
A Diaspora Brasileira e o Governo Lula: Um Framework Transnacional para Pens...
A Diaspora Brasileira e o  Governo Lula: Um Framework Transnacional para Pens...A Diaspora Brasileira e o  Governo Lula: Um Framework Transnacional para Pens...
A Diaspora Brasileira e o Governo Lula: Um Framework Transnacional para Pens...
 
Instituto Diaspora Brasil Newsletter - January 2024
Instituto Diaspora Brasil Newsletter - January 2024Instituto Diaspora Brasil Newsletter - January 2024
Instituto Diaspora Brasil Newsletter - January 2024
 
Brasileiros nos Estados Unidos e em Massachusetts: Um Perfil Demográfico e Ec...
Brasileiros nos Estados Unidos e em Massachusetts: Um Perfil Demográfico e Ec...Brasileiros nos Estados Unidos e em Massachusetts: Um Perfil Demográfico e Ec...
Brasileiros nos Estados Unidos e em Massachusetts: Um Perfil Demográfico e Ec...
 
Do “brain drain” às redes científicas globais.pptx
Do “brain drain” às redes científicas globais.pptxDo “brain drain” às redes científicas globais.pptx
Do “brain drain” às redes científicas globais.pptx
 
The Immigration Debate: A Racial Project 1608 - 2023race cam.pptx
The Immigration Debate: A Racial Project 1608 - 2023race cam.pptxThe Immigration Debate: A Racial Project 1608 - 2023race cam.pptx
The Immigration Debate: A Racial Project 1608 - 2023race cam.pptx
 
As Políticasde Vinculação do Brasil
As Políticasde Vinculação do BrasilAs Políticasde Vinculação do Brasil
As Políticasde Vinculação do Brasil
 
Imigração Transnacional: Um Novo Modo de (Re)Integração
Imigração Transnacional: Um Novo Modo de (Re)IntegraçãoImigração Transnacional: Um Novo Modo de (Re)Integração
Imigração Transnacional: Um Novo Modo de (Re)Integração
 
Transnational social protection Setting the agenda
Transnational social protection Setting the agendaTransnational social protection Setting the agenda
Transnational social protection Setting the agenda
 
Transnational Social Protection
Transnational Social ProtectionTransnational Social Protection
Transnational Social Protection
 
Anegepe - Apresentação do Lvro Brasileiros nos Estados Unidos
Anegepe - Apresentação do Lvro Brasileiros nos Estados UnidosAnegepe - Apresentação do Lvro Brasileiros nos Estados Unidos
Anegepe - Apresentação do Lvro Brasileiros nos Estados Unidos
 
Anegepe - Apresentação do Livro Brasileiros
Anegepe - Apresentação do Livro Brasileiros Anegepe - Apresentação do Livro Brasileiros
Anegepe - Apresentação do Livro Brasileiros
 
Immigrant Integration
Immigrant IntegrationImmigrant Integration
Immigrant Integration
 
Brasileiros em Portugal: De Volta as Raízes Lusitanas
Brasileiros em Portugal: De Volta as Raízes LusitanasBrasileiros em Portugal: De Volta as Raízes Lusitanas
Brasileiros em Portugal: De Volta as Raízes Lusitanas
 
Perfil Migratório do Brasil - 2009
Perfil Migratório do Brasil - 2009Perfil Migratório do Brasil - 2009
Perfil Migratório do Brasil - 2009
 
A prosperous Boston for All - Vietnamese
A prosperous Boston for All - Vietnamese A prosperous Boston for All - Vietnamese
A prosperous Boston for All - Vietnamese
 
A Prosperous Boston for All - Vietnamese
A Prosperous Boston for All - Vietnamese A Prosperous Boston for All - Vietnamese
A Prosperous Boston for All - Vietnamese
 
The Five Largest Foreign-Born Groups in Massachusetts
The Five Largest Foreign-Born Groups in MassachusettsThe Five Largest Foreign-Born Groups in Massachusetts
The Five Largest Foreign-Born Groups in Massachusetts
 
A Prosperous Boston for All - Haitians
A Prosperous Boston for All - HaitiansA Prosperous Boston for All - Haitians
A Prosperous Boston for All - Haitians
 
A Prosperous Boston for All - Caribbeans
A Prosperous Boston for All - CaribbeansA Prosperous Boston for All - Caribbeans
A Prosperous Boston for All - Caribbeans
 

Último

BigBuy dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptx
BigBuy dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptxBigBuy dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptx
BigBuy dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptxolyaivanovalion
 
B2 Creative Industry Response Evaluation.docx
B2 Creative Industry Response Evaluation.docxB2 Creative Industry Response Evaluation.docx
B2 Creative Industry Response Evaluation.docxStephen266013
 
Unveiling Insights: The Role of a Data Analyst
Unveiling Insights: The Role of a Data AnalystUnveiling Insights: The Role of a Data Analyst
Unveiling Insights: The Role of a Data AnalystSamantha Rae Coolbeth
 
Introduction-to-Machine-Learning (1).pptx
Introduction-to-Machine-Learning (1).pptxIntroduction-to-Machine-Learning (1).pptx
Introduction-to-Machine-Learning (1).pptxfirstjob4
 
Dubai Call Girls Wifey O52&786472 Call Girls Dubai
Dubai Call Girls Wifey O52&786472 Call Girls DubaiDubai Call Girls Wifey O52&786472 Call Girls Dubai
Dubai Call Girls Wifey O52&786472 Call Girls Dubaihf8803863
 
Market Analysis in the 5 Largest Economic Countries in Southeast Asia.pdf
Market Analysis in the 5 Largest Economic Countries in Southeast Asia.pdfMarket Analysis in the 5 Largest Economic Countries in Southeast Asia.pdf
Market Analysis in the 5 Largest Economic Countries in Southeast Asia.pdfRachmat Ramadhan H
 
Midocean dropshipping via API with DroFx
Midocean dropshipping via API with DroFxMidocean dropshipping via API with DroFx
Midocean dropshipping via API with DroFxolyaivanovalion
 
Delhi Call Girls CP 9711199171 ☎✔👌✔ Whatsapp Hard And Sexy Vip Call
Delhi Call Girls CP 9711199171 ☎✔👌✔ Whatsapp Hard And Sexy Vip CallDelhi Call Girls CP 9711199171 ☎✔👌✔ Whatsapp Hard And Sexy Vip Call
Delhi Call Girls CP 9711199171 ☎✔👌✔ Whatsapp Hard And Sexy Vip Callshivangimorya083
 
Ravak dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptx
Ravak dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptxRavak dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptx
Ravak dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptxolyaivanovalion
 
定制英国白金汉大学毕业证(UCB毕业证书) 成绩单原版一比一
定制英国白金汉大学毕业证(UCB毕业证书)																			成绩单原版一比一定制英国白金汉大学毕业证(UCB毕业证书)																			成绩单原版一比一
定制英国白金汉大学毕业证(UCB毕业证书) 成绩单原版一比一ffjhghh
 
꧁❤ Greater Noida Call Girls Delhi ❤꧂ 9711199171 ☎️ Hard And Sexy Vip Call
꧁❤ Greater Noida Call Girls Delhi ❤꧂ 9711199171 ☎️ Hard And Sexy Vip Call꧁❤ Greater Noida Call Girls Delhi ❤꧂ 9711199171 ☎️ Hard And Sexy Vip Call
꧁❤ Greater Noida Call Girls Delhi ❤꧂ 9711199171 ☎️ Hard And Sexy Vip Callshivangimorya083
 
Invezz.com - Grow your wealth with trading signals
Invezz.com - Grow your wealth with trading signalsInvezz.com - Grow your wealth with trading signals
Invezz.com - Grow your wealth with trading signalsInvezz1
 
VIP High Profile Call Girls Amravati Aarushi 8250192130 Independent Escort Se...
VIP High Profile Call Girls Amravati Aarushi 8250192130 Independent Escort Se...VIP High Profile Call Girls Amravati Aarushi 8250192130 Independent Escort Se...
VIP High Profile Call Girls Amravati Aarushi 8250192130 Independent Escort Se...Suhani Kapoor
 
(PARI) Call Girls Wanowrie ( 7001035870 ) HI-Fi Pune Escorts Service
(PARI) Call Girls Wanowrie ( 7001035870 ) HI-Fi Pune Escorts Service(PARI) Call Girls Wanowrie ( 7001035870 ) HI-Fi Pune Escorts Service
(PARI) Call Girls Wanowrie ( 7001035870 ) HI-Fi Pune Escorts Serviceranjana rawat
 
Smarteg dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptx
Smarteg dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptxSmarteg dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptx
Smarteg dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptxolyaivanovalion
 
Halmar dropshipping via API with DroFx
Halmar  dropshipping  via API with DroFxHalmar  dropshipping  via API with DroFx
Halmar dropshipping via API with DroFxolyaivanovalion
 
VIP Call Girls in Amravati Aarohi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Amravati
VIP Call Girls in Amravati Aarohi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service AmravatiVIP Call Girls in Amravati Aarohi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Amravati
VIP Call Girls in Amravati Aarohi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service AmravatiSuhani Kapoor
 
Generative AI on Enterprise Cloud with NiFi and Milvus
Generative AI on Enterprise Cloud with NiFi and MilvusGenerative AI on Enterprise Cloud with NiFi and Milvus
Generative AI on Enterprise Cloud with NiFi and MilvusTimothy Spann
 

Último (20)

BigBuy dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptx
BigBuy dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptxBigBuy dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptx
BigBuy dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptx
 
B2 Creative Industry Response Evaluation.docx
B2 Creative Industry Response Evaluation.docxB2 Creative Industry Response Evaluation.docx
B2 Creative Industry Response Evaluation.docx
 
Unveiling Insights: The Role of a Data Analyst
Unveiling Insights: The Role of a Data AnalystUnveiling Insights: The Role of a Data Analyst
Unveiling Insights: The Role of a Data Analyst
 
Introduction-to-Machine-Learning (1).pptx
Introduction-to-Machine-Learning (1).pptxIntroduction-to-Machine-Learning (1).pptx
Introduction-to-Machine-Learning (1).pptx
 
E-Commerce Order PredictionShraddha Kamble.pptx
E-Commerce Order PredictionShraddha Kamble.pptxE-Commerce Order PredictionShraddha Kamble.pptx
E-Commerce Order PredictionShraddha Kamble.pptx
 
Dubai Call Girls Wifey O52&786472 Call Girls Dubai
Dubai Call Girls Wifey O52&786472 Call Girls DubaiDubai Call Girls Wifey O52&786472 Call Girls Dubai
Dubai Call Girls Wifey O52&786472 Call Girls Dubai
 
Market Analysis in the 5 Largest Economic Countries in Southeast Asia.pdf
Market Analysis in the 5 Largest Economic Countries in Southeast Asia.pdfMarket Analysis in the 5 Largest Economic Countries in Southeast Asia.pdf
Market Analysis in the 5 Largest Economic Countries in Southeast Asia.pdf
 
Midocean dropshipping via API with DroFx
Midocean dropshipping via API with DroFxMidocean dropshipping via API with DroFx
Midocean dropshipping via API with DroFx
 
Delhi Call Girls CP 9711199171 ☎✔👌✔ Whatsapp Hard And Sexy Vip Call
Delhi Call Girls CP 9711199171 ☎✔👌✔ Whatsapp Hard And Sexy Vip CallDelhi Call Girls CP 9711199171 ☎✔👌✔ Whatsapp Hard And Sexy Vip Call
Delhi Call Girls CP 9711199171 ☎✔👌✔ Whatsapp Hard And Sexy Vip Call
 
Delhi 99530 vip 56974 Genuine Escort Service Call Girls in Kishangarh
Delhi 99530 vip 56974 Genuine Escort Service Call Girls in  KishangarhDelhi 99530 vip 56974 Genuine Escort Service Call Girls in  Kishangarh
Delhi 99530 vip 56974 Genuine Escort Service Call Girls in Kishangarh
 
Ravak dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptx
Ravak dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptxRavak dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptx
Ravak dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptx
 
定制英国白金汉大学毕业证(UCB毕业证书) 成绩单原版一比一
定制英国白金汉大学毕业证(UCB毕业证书)																			成绩单原版一比一定制英国白金汉大学毕业证(UCB毕业证书)																			成绩单原版一比一
定制英国白金汉大学毕业证(UCB毕业证书) 成绩单原版一比一
 
꧁❤ Greater Noida Call Girls Delhi ❤꧂ 9711199171 ☎️ Hard And Sexy Vip Call
꧁❤ Greater Noida Call Girls Delhi ❤꧂ 9711199171 ☎️ Hard And Sexy Vip Call꧁❤ Greater Noida Call Girls Delhi ❤꧂ 9711199171 ☎️ Hard And Sexy Vip Call
꧁❤ Greater Noida Call Girls Delhi ❤꧂ 9711199171 ☎️ Hard And Sexy Vip Call
 
Invezz.com - Grow your wealth with trading signals
Invezz.com - Grow your wealth with trading signalsInvezz.com - Grow your wealth with trading signals
Invezz.com - Grow your wealth with trading signals
 
VIP High Profile Call Girls Amravati Aarushi 8250192130 Independent Escort Se...
VIP High Profile Call Girls Amravati Aarushi 8250192130 Independent Escort Se...VIP High Profile Call Girls Amravati Aarushi 8250192130 Independent Escort Se...
VIP High Profile Call Girls Amravati Aarushi 8250192130 Independent Escort Se...
 
(PARI) Call Girls Wanowrie ( 7001035870 ) HI-Fi Pune Escorts Service
(PARI) Call Girls Wanowrie ( 7001035870 ) HI-Fi Pune Escorts Service(PARI) Call Girls Wanowrie ( 7001035870 ) HI-Fi Pune Escorts Service
(PARI) Call Girls Wanowrie ( 7001035870 ) HI-Fi Pune Escorts Service
 
Smarteg dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptx
Smarteg dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptxSmarteg dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptx
Smarteg dropshipping via API with DroFx.pptx
 
Halmar dropshipping via API with DroFx
Halmar  dropshipping  via API with DroFxHalmar  dropshipping  via API with DroFx
Halmar dropshipping via API with DroFx
 
VIP Call Girls in Amravati Aarohi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Amravati
VIP Call Girls in Amravati Aarohi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service AmravatiVIP Call Girls in Amravati Aarohi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Amravati
VIP Call Girls in Amravati Aarohi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Amravati
 
Generative AI on Enterprise Cloud with NiFi and Milvus
Generative AI on Enterprise Cloud with NiFi and MilvusGenerative AI on Enterprise Cloud with NiFi and Milvus
Generative AI on Enterprise Cloud with NiFi and Milvus
 

Boston's Shifting Demographics

  • 1. BOSTON’S SHIFTING DEMOGRAPHICS BRA Research Division July 2015
  • 2. Produced by the BRA Research Division: Alvaro Lima – Director Jonathan Lee– Deputy Director Christina Kim – Research Manager Matthew Resseger – Senior Researcher/Economist Phillip Granberry – Senior Researcher/Demographer Kevin Kang – Research Associate Kevin Wandrei – Research Assistant Interns: Grace Riascos Arhan Uguray Andrew DeMatteo The BRA Research Division strives to understand the current environment of the city to produce quality research and targeted information that will inform and benefit the residents and businesses of Boston. The Division conducts research on Boston’s economy, population, and commercial markets for all departments of the BRA, the City of Boston, and related organizations. The information provided in this report is the best available at the time of its publication. All or partial use of this report must be cited. Our preferred citation is as follows: Boston Redevelopment Authority/Research Division, July 2015 For more information about research produced by the Boston Redevelopment Authority, please contact the Research Division at research@boston.gov Research requests can be made through the BRA Research Division’s Research Inquiries website. 2
  • 3. THE PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT IS TO PROVIDE A FACTUAL BASIS TO UNDERSTAND:  Aggregate statistics showing historical trends that shaped the present population  Disaggregated statistics providing a more nuanced understanding of these trends, and  How these trends can shape the future 3
  • 5. OUTLINE  What Are The Trends? > A Growing City > A Diverse City > An Educated City > A Youthful City > Changing Households and Families  A Growing City > Population Growth Citywide > Components of Population Growth > Population Growth by Neighborhood  A Diverse City > Changing Racial and Ethnic Composition > Minority-Majority City > Changing Nativity and Ancestry Composition > Changing Neighborhoods – Racial and Ethnic Diversity > Language Proficiency  An Educated City > Educational Attainment > Educational Attainment by Nativity > Educational Attainment by Gender > Educational Attainment by Race and Ethnicity  A Youthful City > Breakdown of Boston’s Population by Age > Changes in Age Groups > Change in Median Age > Age by Nativity and Race/Ethnicity > Age Distribution by Neighborhoods  Boston’s Changing Families > Marital Status > Household Size > Family Types > Children and Seniors 5
  • 6. WHAT ARE THE TRENDS? 6
  • 7. WHAT ARE THE TRENDS? (1) A GROWING CITY  Boston’s population grew by 4.8% between 2000 and 2010, marking the first time since 1970 that Boston’s population exceeded 600,000 people  The foreign-born population has accounted for much of the city’s population growth for the last five decades, making immigration a key driver of Boston’s population growth  Natural growth (births – deaths) has been mainly fueled by a high birth rate among Black/African- American residents, Latino residents, and foreign-born mothers  Between 2000 and 2010, Roxbury, Fenway, Allston and Downtown grew in population, and these four neighborhoods together account for 65.2% of all growth in the city; Dorchester, Mattapan, Jamaica Plain, Longwood and Beacon Hill all declined in population between 2000 and 2010 7
  • 8. WHAT ARE THE TRENDS? (2) A DIVERSE CITY  Since 1970, the population of Boston became more racially and ethnically diverse with the non- white population making up 53% of the city’s population in 2010  Foreign-born Hispanic and Asian immigrants were major contributors to the increasing diversity of Boston’s population  At the neighborhood level, most neighborhoods increased their diversity index score between 2000 and 2010, with Chinatown, the Leather District, and West Roxbury making the biggest gains  In 2013, almost 36% of Boston’s residents spoke a language other than English at home – up from only 13% in 1980  Despite increasing diversity between 1970 and 2010, the African American, Hispanic, and foreign- born populations remained concentrated in a few neighborhoods 8
  • 9. WHAT ARE THE TRENDS? (3) AN EDUCATED CITY  Boston has one of the most highly-educated populations in the country, ranking 8th among a set of 25 comparable cities  The proportion of Bostonians with a bachelor’s degree or higher rose every decade from 6.4% in 1950 to 43.9% in 2013; while the percentage of those without a high school education fell from 53.9% to 15.5%  Educational attainment has been increasing for all segments of Boston’s population, and women’s educational attainment has nearly matched that of men  However, significant educational disparities persist among different racial and ethnic groups and among immigrants:  60.5% of the White population has a bachelor’s degree in contrast to only 18.6% of the Black/African American population and 15.8% of the Hispanic population  While 49.3% of the native population holds a bachelor’s degree, only 30.1% of the foreign- born population holds a similar degree 9
  • 10. WHAT ARE THE TRENDS? (4) A YOUTHFUL CITY  While the nation’s median age has moved progressively higher in the past few decades, Boston’s median age has grown much more slowly in comparison:  The population age 0 to 4 fell from 9.5% of the population in 1960 to 5.3% in 1980, and has remained at that level since  The share of youth, ages 0 to 19 has been decreasing from a peak of 33% in 1970 to 21% in 2013  The 20-34 population increased from a low of 21% in 1960 to 34% in 2013, while the 35-64 population increased to a lesser extent from a low of 27% in 1980 to 33% in 2010  In 2013, seniors (population 65 and over) made up 11% of the Boston population – a very stable share since 1950, suggesting that the aging population is not a growing concern in Boston  However, residents in the youngest cohorts – under 19 – are proportionately more Hispanic and Black/African-American than the 20 to 34 cohort, suggesting that the college-aged population in Boston is not representative of young residents who grow up in the city 10
  • 11. WHAT ARE THE TRENDS? (5) CHANGING HOUSEHOLDS AND FAMILIES  Boston’s average household size fell significantly from 3.4 in 1950 to 2.4 in 1980 and remained at that level through 2013  The share of Boston’s population that is single, never-married, rose from 33.1% in 1950 to 56.6% in 2013, and more people are living alone – 38% of housing units have only one person in 2013, up from 23.9% of units in 1960  The proportion of households that are families has been falling, a trend that corresponds with the falling share of married people and children as a percent of the population  The share of Boston households with a person 65 years and over decreased from 22.9% in 1980 to 19.6% in 2013  However, linguistically isolated households – households where no one 14 or older spoke English at least very well – increased to 12% in 2010, up from 8% of households in 1990 11
  • 13.  Boston’s population reached its peak in 1950, with just over 800,000 residents  Like many major U.S. cities, Boston experienced significant decline in the post-World War II era. By 1980, Boston’s population fell to under 563,000 residents  Since 1980, Boston’s population grew by 14%, with the 2010 Census marking the first time since 1970 that Boston’s population exceeded 600,000 people  Boston’s 2013 American Community Survey 1-year population estimate is 644,710 +/- 3,772 13 Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 1900-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2013 American Community Survey 1-year estimate, BRA Research Division Analysis 617,594 589,141 574,823 562,994 641,071 697,197 801,444 770,816781,188 748,060 670,585 560,892 644,710 500,000 550,000 600,000 650,000 700,000 750,000 800,000 850,000 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Boston's Population (1900-2013) Decennial Census ACS Estimate, 2013 2013
  • 14.  The population growth between 2000 and 2010 (4.8%) marks the first time in the last one hundred years that the population of Boston grew faster than that of the state (3.1%)  Boston’s 2000-2010 growth rate of 4.8% was also the highest since 1910-1920 when the population of the city grew by 11.6% due in part to the 1912 annexation of Hyde Park  The Boston Metro Area, defined as the MAPC region, grew by 3.5% between 2000 and 2010, a rate that was faster than the Massachusetts average, but slower than the city of Boston 4.8% 2.5%2.1% -12.2% -8.1% -13.0% 4.0% -1.3% 4.4% 11.6% 19.6% 3.1% 5.5% 4.9% 0.8% 10.5% 9.8% 8.7% 1.6% 10.3% 14.4% -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Population Growth for Boston and Massachusetts by Decade (1910 – 2010) Boston % Change Massachusetts % Change 14 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1910-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, Metropolitan Area Planning Council, MetroBoston DataCommon, Population by Decade for the MetroFuture Region, BRA Research Division Analysis
  • 15.  Boston’s population growth between 2000 and 2010 compares favorably to most Northern cities. Other cities on this list – including Charlotte, Raleigh and Austin – benefit from their states’ liberal land annexation laws, which allow them to expand their populations by annexing adjacent land 15 46.3% 35.2% 20.4% 10.3% 10.2% 9.4% 8.2% 8.0% 7.5% 6.9% 5.7% 5.2% 4.8% 3.7% 2.6% 2.1% 0.8% 0.8% 0.6% 0.0% -4.6% -6.9% -8.3% -8.6% -25.0% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Raleigh, NC Charlotte, NC Austin, TX Portland, OR Miami, FL Phoenix, AZ Denver, CO Seattle, WA Houston, TX San Diego, CA San Jose, CA Washington, DC Boston, MA San Francisco, CA Los Angeles, CA New York, NY Atlanta, GA Dallas, TX Philadelphia, PA Minneapolis, MN Baltimore, MD Chicago, IL St. Louis, MO Pittsburgh, PA Detroit, MI Population Growth with Comparison Cities* (2000 - 2010) This report’s consistent set of 25 comparison cities: the principal cities of the nation’s largest metropolitan areas, plus 3 cities whose highly educated metro area populations make them good comparisons for Boston. These include Raleigh, Austin and San Jose. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
  • 16.  Boston’s native-born population decreased from 1950 to 2000, but increased by 6.5% to 465,905 from 2000 to 2013  In contrast, Boston’s foreign-born population has increased steadily since 1970, accounting for much of the city’s population growth over the last five decades 16 Note: Subtotals may not exactly add to total due to differences in data sources Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1950-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2010 & 2013 1-year estimates, American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis 801,444 697,938 641,071 562,994 574,283 589,141 617,594 644,710657,352 587,974 557,068 475,938 459,686 437,305 454,072 465,905 144,092 109,964 83,988 87,056 114,597 151,836 167,311 178,805 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Native and Foreign-born Components of Boston's Population (1950-2013) Total Population Native Born Foreign Born American Community Survey Estimates 2013
  • 17.  In 2010, Boston’s population was 52% female, a higher proportion than the US and Massachusetts (50.8% and 51.6% respectively)  Between 2000 and 2010, the female population in Boston grew by 5.3%, while the male population grew slightly slower at 4.4% 17 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1950-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2013 1-Year American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis 388,180 334,707 295,240 265,526 275,972 283,588 295,951 413,264 362,490 345,831 297,468 298,311 305,553 321,643 308,191 336,519 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Gender Component of Boston's Population (1950-2013) Males Females ACS Estimates 2013
  • 18.  Demographic growth is based on (a) natural growth -- births minus deaths -- and (b) net migration  Natural growth in 2012 was 4,274 persons. The decline in deaths over the decade contributed to an increase in natural growth  Immigration also drives Boston's population growth in part because of the high number of births to immigrants - 40% of Boston births are to foreign-born mothers 18 Source: Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston Public Health Commission Research and Evaluation Office 8,067 8,003 7,716 7,906 8,015 7,807 8,011 4,486 4,406 4,042 3,857 3,875 3,646 3,737 3,581 3,597 3,674 4,049 4,140 4,161 4,274 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Boston Resident Births and Death (2000-2012) Births Deaths Natural Growth
  • 19.  The natural population growth of the White population went from negative in 2000 to positive in 2003 and continued to grow through 2012  The natural population growth of the Black/African American population remained positive but decreased due to a lower number of births  The natural population growth of the Latino population remained high, at 1,705 in 2012  Asian natural growth remained steady over the periods 2000-2012 19 Source: Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston Public Health Commission Research and Evaluation Office 541 508 470 448 452 441 540 1,499 1,373 1,158 1,330 1,125 1,200 1,172 1,585 1,618 1,404 1,517 1,507 1,461 1,705 -336 -194 204 297 762 916 768 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Boston Natural Population Growth by Race and Ethnicity (2000-2012) Asian Black Hispanic White
  • 20. 20 NEIGHBORHOOD POPULATION (2010) DORCHESTER 114,235 ROXBURY 48,454 BRIGHTON 45,801 EAST BOSTON 40,508 JAMAICA PLAIN 37,468 FENWAY 33,796 SOUTH BOSTON 33,311 HYDE PARK 30,637 WEST ROXBURY 30,446 ALLSTON 29,196 ROSLINDALE 28,680 SOUTH END 24,577 MATTAPAN 22,600 BACK BAY 18,088 CHARLESTOWN 16,439 MISSION HILL 16,305 NORTH END 10,131 DOWNTOWN 9,872 BEACON HILL 9,023 WEST END 5,423 CHINATOWN 4,444 LONGWOOD 3,785 SOUTH BOSTON WATER FRONT 1,889 BAY VILLAGE 1,312 LEATHER DISTRICT 639 HARBOR ISLANDS 535 Allston 4.7% Back Bay 2.9% Bay Village 0.2% Beacon Hill 1.5% Brighton 7.4% Charlestown 2.7% Chinatown 0.7% Dorchester 18.5% Downtown 1.6% East Boston 6.6%Fenway 5.5% Harbor Islands 0.1% Hyde Park 5.0% Jamaica Plain 6.1% Leather District 0.1% Longwood 0.6% Mattapan 3.7% Mission Hill 2.6% North End 1.6% Roslindale 4.6% Roxbury 7.8% South Boston 5.4% South Boston Waterfront 0.3% South End 4.0% West End 0.9% West Roxbury 4.9% Population Share by Neighborhood - 2010  Dorchester is by far the largest neighborhood, followed by Roxbury and Brighton  The top eight largest neighborhoods together comprise more than 60% of the city’s total population Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
  • 21.  The South Boston Waterfront saw a residential population boom from 2000 to 2010 – 1,380 people, for a growth rate of 271%  65.2% of Boston’s population growth between 2000 and 2010 came from four neighborhoods: Roxbury, Fenway, Allston and Downtown  Dorchester, Mattapan, Jamaica Plain, Longwood, and Beacon Hill lost the most population between 2000 and 2010, but all five gained population between 2010 and 2013 21 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis POPULATION CHANGE, 2000-2010
  • 22. 22 Neighborhood Population Density -- 2013 Persons per square mile of residential land Percentage Change in Density, 2000-2013 Longwood 2,337,453 31.8% West End 299,702 -18.2% Fenway 268,630 6.6% Downtown/Chinatown 216,914 3.6% North End 129,318 -4.6% South End 122,890 -3.6% Back Bay 115,443 -2.6% Beacon Hill 113,743 -0.5% Mission Hill 92,023 -5.6% Allston 91,102 -2.0% South Boston Waterfront 45,977 -40.5% Charlestown 73,823 0.8% South Boston 71,964 6.6% East Boston 67,726 11.2% Roxbury 49,435 -3.8% Brighton 35,963 -16.0% BOSTON 40,772 1.9% Dorchester 38,532 -2.6% Jamaica Plain 30,881 0.9% Mattapan 27,566 -4.4% Roslindale 23,447 3.4% Hyde Park 17,610 4.3% West Roxbury 13,693 7.4% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 U.S. Decennial Census, 2009-2013 American Community Survey; City of Boston Assessor’s Data, BRA Research Division Analysis  From 2000 to 2013, Boston increased residential parcels in the city by 19,719,950 square feet, or 4.8%. Neighborhoods like the South Boston Waterfront and Downtown/Chinatown saw greater growth, at 210% and 39.5%, respectively. Only two neighborhoods -- Longwood (-1.4%) and Hyde Park (-0.2%) – experienced declines in residential parcels
  • 23.  Boston’s white population shrank slightly (-0.4%) between 2000 and 2010, compared to a small increase of 1.2% nationwide  In absolute terms, the white population grew most in Roxbury, Downtown, the South End, Mission Hill and Allston  Hyde Park, Dorchester, Roslindale and West Roxbury saw the biggest absolute declines in the white population 23 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis WHITE POPULATION CHANGE, 2000-2010
  • 24. 24  Boston’s Black/African-American population declined slightly (-1.6%) between 2000 and 2010, compared to an 11% increase nationwide  In absolute terms, Hyde Park, West Roxbury, Roslindale, and South Boston saw the largest increases in the Black/African-American population  Dorchester, Mattapan, Jamaica Plain, the South End, and Roxbury saw the largest declines Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis BLACK/AFRICAN- AMERICAN POPULATION CHANGE, 2000-2010
  • 25. 25  Boston’s Hispanic population increased by 27% from 2000 to 2010, compared to a 43% increase nationwide  In absolute terms, East Boston, Roxbury, Dorchester, Hyde Park, and West Roxbury saw the largest increases in the Hispanic/Latino population  Jamaica Plain, Charlestown and Longwood lost Hispanic/Latino population Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis HISPANIC POPULATION CHANGE, 2000-2010
  • 26. 26  Boston’s Asian population grew by 25% from 2000 to 2010, compared to 43% nationwide  In absolute terms, Fenway, Allston, the South End, West Roxbury and Dorchester saw the largest increases in the Asian population  East Boston, Longwood and Roslindale lost Asian population Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis ASIAN POPULATION CHANGE, 2000-2010
  • 28.  Boston’s White population decreased from 80% of the population in 1970 to 47% in 2010  The share of the Hispanic/Latino population increased from 3% in 1970 to 18% of Boston’s population in 2010  The African American population shifted from 16% of the population in 1970 to 22% of the population in 2010  Hispanic and Asian immigration contribute heavily to Boston’s growing diversity 28 Note: 2000 was the first year the Census compiled data on individuals who identified themselves as multiracial. Those who indicated “two or more races” are included in “Other” in 2000 and 2010 in this chart. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970 -2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis 79.8% 67.9% 59.0% 49.5% 47.0% 46.6% 15.8% 21.7% 23.8% 23.8% 22.4% 22.9% 2.6% 6.4% 10.8% 14.4% 17.5% 18.0% 1.3% 2.7% 5.2% 7.5% 8.9% 9.0% 1.4% 1.2% 4.7% 4.3% 3.7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013 Boston's Diverse Population 1970-2013 White Black / African American Hispanic Asian / Pacific Islander Other
  • 29. 29  The non-White share of Boston’s population has increased dramatically since 1950 from 5.3% to 53% in 2010  The minority share of Boston’s population (53%) is higher that that of Massachusetts (22.6%) or the U.S. (35.3%) Note: Prior to 1970, Hispanics may be included in either the White or non-White category. For 1970-2010, Hispanics are included with non-Whites for this analysis Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1950-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis 5.3% 9.8% 20.2% 32.1% 41.0% 50.5% 53.0% 1.7% 2.4% 4.6% 7.7% 12.2% 18.1% 22.6% 10.5% 11.4% 16.8% 20.4% 24.4% 30.9% 35.3% 53.4% 24.3% 37.5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Share of Boston's Non-White Population (1950-2013) Boston Massachusetts United States ACS Estimates 2013
  • 30. 30  Since 2000, Boston has become a “majority-minority” city. The non-white population is over 50% partly due to the growth of the foreign-born population from Latin America, the Caribbean, and Asia  This trend continued in 2010 with the minority population making up 53% of Boston’s population or about 328,231 residents 1.4% 1.7% 1.9% 2.3% 2.2% 2.3% 2.9% 3.3% 5.3% 9.8% 20.2% 32.1% 41.0% 50.5% 53.0% 98.6% 98.3% 98.1% 97.7% 97.8% 97.7% 97.1% 96.7% 94.7% 90.2% 79.8% 67.9% 59.0% 49.5% 47.0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Boston's Minority Population 1870-2010 Total non-White population White population Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1870-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
  • 31.  The Racial Diversity Index calculates the likelihood that two people randomly chosen from a geographic area are from a different racial or ethnic group  The Diversity Index shows that Boston and most of its neighborhoods, though not all of its neighborhoods, were more diverse in 2010 than in 2000  The Racial Diversity Index for the city as a whole increased from .64 to .66 between 2000 and 2010 31 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 Dorchester Harbor Islands Boston Mission Hill Roslindale Hyde Park Roxbury South End Jamaica Plain Allston East Boston West End Bay Village Fenway Brighton LMA Downtown West Roxbury Charlestown South Boston Mattapan Leather District Chinatown Back Bay South Boston Waterfront Beacon Hill North End Neighborhood Diversity Index (2000 - 2010) 2010 2000 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis Based on the methodology “Mapping the USA’s diversity from 1960 to 2060” USA TODAY
  • 32. RACIAL DIVERSITY  Racial diversity by census tract increased dramatically in most of Boston from 1970 to 2010  In the maps, yellow represents census tracts with low racial diversity index scores, while red represents census tracts with high racial diversity 32 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970 - 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
  • 33. BLACK/AFRICAN AMERICAN POPULATION  In 1970, the Black/African American population was largely concentrated in the neighborhoods of Roxbury and parts of Dorchester and Mattapan (tracts colored red in the maps at right)  In 2010 that concentration was still evident, although the Black/African American population had increased throughout Dorchester, Mattapan, and Hyde Park Note: Maps are animated in electronic version. See alternate static version for hard copies. 33 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970 - 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
  • 34. HISPANIC POPULATION • The Hispanic population has grown significantly since 1970 with large communities with large communities forming in East Boston and Jamaica Plain (colored red in maps at right) Note: Maps are animated in electronic version. See alternate static version for hard copies 34 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
  • 35.  Historically, Boston has had a greater proportion of foreign-born residents than both Massachusetts and the U.S.  In 2013, Boston was home to 178,805 foreign-born people, 27.7% of Boston’s population – a higher proportion than that of both Massachusetts (16%) and the U.S. (13%)  In recent decades, the proportion of foreign-born residents in Boston has grown dramatically, from 12.6% in 1970 to 27.7% in 2013. However, this proportion is lower than the 36.3% peak share in 1910. The recent growth is due largely to the passage of the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act, which ended quotas based on national origin  Boston’s foreign-born population increased 18% from 2000 to 2013, from 151,836 to 178,805 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1850-2000 U.S. Decennial Census, 2010 1-year American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis 35 34% 36% 13% 27% 17% 32% 9% 15% 10% 15% 5% 13% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Proportion of Population that is Foreign-Born (1850-2010) Quotas Policy Boston Massachusetts United States
  • 36. 36  With 178,805 foreign-born residents in 2013, 27.7% of Boston’s population was foreign-born. This ranks Boston highly when compared with other large U.S. cities This report uses a consistent set of 25 US cities for all comparisons. See Slide 15 for more detail. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013 1-year American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis Native 72% Foreign born 28% Boston’s Population by Nativity 2013 Foreign-born Rank % of Foreign - born City Total Population Rank 1 56.6% Miami, FL 22 2 39.3% San Jose,CA 9 3 38.2% Los Angeles, CA 2 4 37.0% New York, NY 1 5 34.9% San Francisco, CA 10 6 28.3% Houston, TX 4 7 27.7% Boston, MA 15 8 26.3% San Diego, CA 7 9 24.4% Dallas, TX 8 10 21.1% Chicago, IL 3 11 19.7% Phoenix, AZ 6 12 18.1% Austin, TX 11 13 17.7% Seattle,WA 16 14 16.1% Minneapolis, MN 23 15 16.1% Charlotte, NC 12 16 15.2% Denver, CO 18 17 14.7% Portland, OR 19 18 14.4% Washington, DC 17 19 12.8% Raleigh, NC 21 20 12.7% Philadelphia, PA 5 21 8.3% Pittsburgh, PA 25 22 7.2% Atlanta, GA 20 23 7.1% Baltimore, MD 14 24 6.9% St. Louis, MO 24 25 5.0% Detroit, MI 13
  • 37. FOREIGN BORN POPULATION  The percentage of the population that is foreign-born has increased in most census tracts in Boston since 1970  In the maps at right, yellow census tracts have a foreign-born population of less than 10%  In the red census tracts, foreign- born residents make up more than 60% of the population 37 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, BRA Research Division Analysis
  • 38.  In 2013, naturalized citizens made up 45.4% of Boston’s foreign-born population, a much lower share than that of 1970 but a growing share of the foreign-born population since 1990  The number of immigrants in Boston who were not citizens was 91,158 in 2013 38 68.1% 49.8% 34.4% 37.3% 44.3% 45.4% 31.9% 50.2% 65.6% 62.7% 55.7% 54.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013 Boston's Foreign-born Population by Citizenship Status (1970 - 2013) Naturalized Non-naturalized Source: U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Decennial Census 1950-2000, 2006-2010 and 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
  • 39.  Today, most of Boston’s immigrants come from Latin America, the Caribbean, and Asia. This is a dramatic change from 1970, when most immigrants came from Europe 39 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970-2000 U.S. Decennial Census and 2006-2010 and 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis 25.2% 32.3% 45.1% 49.3% 50.3% 50.7% 8.0% 16.0% 21.0% 24.2% 25.3% 25.5% 63.6% 37.9% 24.2% 17.5% 14.3% 13.6% 0.6% 4.8% 3.3% 9.0% 10.1% 10.2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013 Region of Origin of Boston's Immigrants Americas Asia Europe Africa
  • 40.  Boston’s foreign-born population comes from more than 100 countries. The Dominican Republic and China are the most common countries of origin for Boston’s foreign-born population  43.5% of Hispanics and 68.1% of Asians in Boston are foreign-born  The top ten countries of origin represent 57% of the total foreign-born population 40 2.1% 2.5% 3.6% 3.7% 4.0% 5.5% 5.6% 9.2% 10.0% 10.7% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% Trinidad and Tobago Guatemala Jamaica Colombia Cape Verde Vietnam El Salvador Haiti China Dominican Republic Top Ten Countries of Origin of Boston's Foreign-born - 2013 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
  • 41.  Self-reported ancestries reflect earlier waves of immigration to Boston from Ireland, Italy, England, and Germany  Puerto Rican, Dominican, Chinese, Haitian, and Salvadoran ancestries reflect more recent arrivals 41 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 4% 5% 5% 6% 12% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% Salvadoran German American English Haitian Chinese Dominican Puerto Rican Italian Irish Percent of Total Population Top Ten Ancestries for Boston’s Population – 2013
  • 42.  Boston’s immigrant populations cluster together in particular neighborhoods. Boston’s largest immigrant groups live in:  Dominican  Jamaica Plain, Roxbury  Chinese  Allston, Brighton, Downtown/Chinatown  Haitian  Hyde Park, Mattapan, Roslindale  El Salvadorian  East Boston  Vietnamese  Dorchester 42 Source U.S. Census Bureau,: 2006-2010 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
  • 43.  Of Bostonians age 5 and over who speak a language other than English at home, 44.1% speak Spanish, up from 30.2% in 1980  The number of Italian speakers has declined since 1980 while French Creole and Vietnamese speakers have increased 43 Source: U.S Census Bureau, 1980-2000 U.S. Decennial Census, 2006-2010 American Community Survey, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis 30.2% 37.2% 40.7% 42.2% 44.1% 17.7% 8.3% 3.6% 2.2% 1.9% 10.8% 10.3% 9.5% 10.7% 10.3% 4.6% 5.6% 6.7% 6.9% 4.5% 8.7% 14.2% 14.6% 13.5% 14.6% 0.5% 3.1% 4.2% 4.4% 5.3% 27.6% 21.3% 20.6% 20.1% 19.2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013 %ofthose5+whospeakalanguageotherthanEnglishathome Languages other than English Spoken at Home (1980-2013) Spanish Italian Chinese Portuguese French / French Creole Vietnamese Other
  • 44.  In 2010, 12% of Boston households were linguistically isolated – no one 14 or older in the household spoke English at least very well – up from 8% of households in 1990  Most linguistically isolated households are of Hispanic origin reflecting the growth of this population in the last decade  64% of Boston households only spoke English at home in 2010, down from 73% of households in 1990 44 73.1% 66.6% 64.3% 64.3% 18.8% 22.7% 24.0% 24.0% 8.1% 10.7% 11.7% 11.7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1990 2000 2010 2013 Linguistically Isolated Households in Boston (1990-2013) English-only Language other than English, not linguistically isolated Linguistically isolated Number of English-only speakers may not match previous slide due to differences in data sources Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1990-2000 U.S. Decennial Census, 2006-2010 American Community Survey, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis
  • 46.  Boston’s population is more educated than the national average, with 43.9% of residents holding a Bachelor’s degree or higher, compared to just 28.8% nationwide  Boston is the 8th most educated city among a list of comparable cities. The Greater Boston area ranks even higher, at 4th among major metropolitan areas, in BA share 46 City Percent with at Least a BA, City City Rank Percent with at Least a BA, Metro Area Metro Area Rank Seattle, WA 57.4% 1 38.0% 9 Washington, DC 52.4% 3 47.9% 1 San Francisco, CA 52.4% 2 44.5% 3 Raleigh, NC 47.5% 4 42.2% 5 Atlanta, GA 46.8% 5 34.9% 12 Minneapolis, MN 45.7% 6 38.4% 8 Austin, TX 45.6% 7 40.6% 6 Boston, MA 43.9% 8 43.4% 4 Portland, OR 43.8% 9 34.5% 15 Denver, CO 42.9% 10 39.2% 7 San Diego, CA 41.7% 11 34.6% 14 Charlotte, NC 39.8% 12 30.6% 20 San Jose, CA 37.4% 13 45.7% 2 Pittsburgh, PA 35.5% 14 29.9% 21 New York, NY 34.5% 15 36.5% 10 Chicago, IL 34.2% 16 34.6% 13 Los Angeles, CA 31.1% 17 31.4% 18 St. Louis, MO 29.6% 18 30.9% 19 Dallas, TX 29.4% 19 31.7% 17 Houston, TX 29.2% 20 29.4% 22 Baltimore, MD 26.8% 21 36.0% 11 Phoenix, AZ 26.3% 22 28.7% 24 Philadelphia, PA 23.9% 23 33.6% 16 Miami, FL 23.1% 24 28.9% 23 Detroit, MI 12.7% 25 28.1% 25 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis Educational Attainment for Comparison Cities
  • 47. 47  The proportion of Bostonians with a bachelor’s degree or higher rose every decade from 6.4% in 1950 to 42.5% in 2010 (43.9% in 2013 according to ACS data)  The percentage of Bostonians with a high school diploma or some college has remained relatively stable since 1970 at around 40-45% of the population  The percentage without a high school education fell from 53.9% in 1950 to 15.7% in 2010 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1950 – 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2013 1-Year American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis 6.4% 7.6% 10.5% 20.3% 30.0% 34.9% 42.5% 43.9% 6.6% 7.7% 8.6% 13.1% 19.1% 19.3% 18.2% 18.7% 28.9% 29.3% 35.2% 35.0% 26.6% 24.1% 23.6% 22.4% 53.9% 55.4% 45.7% 31.6% 24.3% 21.7% 15.7% 15.0% 4.2% 6.2% 7.7% 10.8% 16.2% 20.3% 24.4% 27.9% 29.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013 %ofPopulation25YearsandOver Educational Attainment of Boston vs U.S. (1950-2013) Bachelor's degree or higher Some college of Associate's degree High school Less than high school Not reported U.S. Bachelor's degree or higher
  • 48. 48 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970 - 2000 U.S. Decennial Census, 1990 Public Use Microdata Sample, 2010 & 2013 1-Year American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis  The gender gap in educational attainment for Bachelor’s degree or higher diminished from 5.4 percentage points in 1970 to 1.4 percentage points in 2010  The gender gap in 2013 stood at just 0.4 percentage points. Notably, the proportion of females holding graduate or professional degrees was higher than males in 2013: 21.3% of females in Boston had a professional or advanced degree, compared to 19.3% of males  In the future, women’s educational attainment may surpass that of men since women make up 55.5% of Boston residents enrolled in college or graduate school 13.3% 24.7% 32.8% 36.6% 43.2% 7.9% 16.6% 26.9% 33.4% 41.8% 45.4% 45.0% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Population 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Male Female Male, ACS Female, ACS 2013
  • 49. 49 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1980-2000 U.S. Census, 2006-2010 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis  Educational attainment has been increasing for all racial/ethnic groups in Boston  However, significant disparities in educational attainment between racial/ethnic groups still exist  For example, 60.5% of the White population, but only 15.8% of the Hispanic population, had a bachelor’s degree or higher in 2010  The Asian population of Boston is bimodal: 49% has a bachelor’s degree or higher, but 24.9% has less than a high school education 23.2% 60.5% 8.7% 18.6% 10.3% 15.8% 21.1% 49.0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 1980 1990 2000 2010 Population 25+ with Bachelor's Degree or Higher White Black/African-American Hispanic Asian 28.0% 6.5% 37.6% 19.7% 55.7% 34.5% 49.0% 24.9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 1980 1990 2000 2010 Population 25+ with less than High School Education White Black/African-American Hispanic Asian
  • 50. 50 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1980-2000 U.S. Decennial Census, 2006-2010 American Community Survey, Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), BRA Research Division Analysis  The educational attainment of both the native- and foreign-born populations has been increasing over time  However, the foreign-born population has significantly lower levels of educational attainment than the native- born population 21.8% 32.3% 39.8% 49.3% 11.6% 20.7% 26.5% 30.1% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 1980 1990 2000 2010 Population 25+ with Bachelor's Degree or Higher Native Foreign born 27.1% 20.3% 15.6% 9.5% 50.9% 38.2% 34.1% 27.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 1980 1990 2000 2010 Population 25+ with less than High School Education Native Foreign born
  • 52. 52  The median age in Massachusetts and the U.S. has risen significantly since 1970  Boston has maintained a more youthful population, and its median age has only risen from 28.1 in 1970 to 30.8 in 2010 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1950-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2013 1-Year American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis 32.6 32.9 28.1 28.9 30.4 31.1 30.8 32.8 32.1 29.5 31.2 33.4 36.5 39.1 30.2 29.5 28.1 30.0 32.9 35.3 31.7 39.1 39.4 37.2 37.5 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Median Age in Boston/MA/US (1950-2013) Boston Masachusetts U.S. ACS Estimates 2013
  • 53. 53  The percentage of Boston’s population that is age 0 to 19 has been decreasing to 21.4% in 2013  The population between 20 and 34 has been increasing to 34.3% in 2013  The 35-64 population had a 33.8% share in 2013  The population 65 and over was 10.6% of Boston’s population in 2013 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1950-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2013 1-Year American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis 28.9% 32.1% 33.3% 26.9% 23.3% 24.1% 22.0% 21.4% 24.6% 20.6% 24.4% 33.5% 36.3% 33.1% 35.0% 34.3% 36.8% 35.1% 29.5% 27.0% 28.9% 32.4% 33.0% 33.8% 9.7% 12.3% 12.8% 12.7% 11.5% 10.4% 10.1% 10.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013 Age Distribution of Boston's Population (1950-2013) 0-19 20-34 35-64 65 and over
  • 54.  The 0-4 and 5-14 populations declined during the 1970s, but have stabilized since 1980 at approximately 5% and 9% of the population, respectively  Since 1950, the population of Boston age 20 to 34 has grown dramatically as a share of the population. In absolute terms, it increased from 197,007 in 1950 to 216,213 in 2010  Boston has the highest concentration of young adults (20 to 34) among 25 comparable cities 54 This report uses a consistent set of 25 US cities for all comparisons. See Slide 15 for more detail. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1950-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2013 American Community Survey 1-year estimate, BRA Research Division Analysis 2013 8.9% 9.5% 7.8% 5.4% 13.3% 16.0% 11.2% 6.8% 7.4% 9.5% 9.9% 7.4% 24.6% 20.6% 36.3% 33.1% 5.4% 8.5% 7.4% 34.3% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Changes in 34 and Under Population (1950-2013) 0 to 4 years 5 to 14 years 15 to 19 years 20 to 34 years ACS Estimates
  • 55. 55  In 2009, the population aged 20 to 34 increased substantially compared to earlier years  Boston’s population pyramid consistently demonstrates a low dependency ratio, meaning the working-aged population is comparatively larger than the population of children and retirees  Note: Maps are animated in electronic version. See alternate static version for hard copies Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1990-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2005-2013 American Community Survey 1-year estimates, BRA Research Division Analysis
  • 56. 56 0-19 POPULATION  In 2013, there were 136,998 children aged 0- 19 in Boston, making up 21.4% of the population – compared to 23.7% population share in the greater Boston region  The 0-19 population is racially diverse, with almost equal numbers of White, Black/African-American, and Hispanic youth  Almost 90% of Boston youth are native-born, but close to half live with at least one foreign- born parent  Of the approximately 77,200 school age children in Boston, 74% attend Boston Public Schools  86% of BPS students are Black/African- American, Hispanic, or Asian  44% of BPS students speak a language other than English as their first language, and 29% of BPS students are Limited English Proficient (LEP) or ELL (English Language Learners) Native 90% Foreign born 10% Nativity of Boston's 0-19 Population Note: Youth living with a foreign-born parent is for ages 0-17 due to data availability. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, Boston Public Schools at a Glance 2014-2015, BRA Research Division Analysis White 30% Black/African- American 29% Hispanic 27% Asian 8% Other 6% Racial/Ethnic Composition of Boston's 0-19 Population
  • 57. 57 20-34 POPULATION  In 2013, there were 219,717 young adults aged 20-34 in Boston, making up 34% of the population – compared to 22.7% population share in the greater Boston region  56% of 20-34 year olds are White, non- Hispanic and 77% are native born  According to 2010 Census data, Boston had the highest percentage of 20-34 year olds of 25 comparable cities  2/3 of 18-24 year olds in Boston were enrolled in college or graduate school in 2013  80.9% of 20-34 year olds were single, never-married in 2013  In 2009-2013 data, 82,834 Boston residents were undergraduate students, and 28,631 were graduate students White 56% Black/African- American 16% Hispanic 15% Asian 10% Other 3% Racial/Ethnic Composition of Boston's 20-34 Population Native 77% Foreign born 23% Nativity of Boston's 20-34 Population This report uses a consistent set of 25 US cities for all comparisons. See Slide 15 for more detail. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), BRA Research Division Analysis
  • 58. 58 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, Public Use Microdata Sample,( PUMS), BRA Research Division Analysis White 45% Black/African- American 26% Hispanic 17% Asian 9% Other 3% Racial/Ethnic Composition of Boston's 35-64 Population Native 62% Foreign born 38% Nativity of Boston's 35-64 Population 35-64 POPULATION  In 2013, there were 216,911 adults aged 35-64 in Boston, making up 34% of the population – compared to a 40.1% population share in the greater Boston region  The 35-64 share of the population has been growing since a low of 27% in 1980  Less than half (45%) of this age group is White, non- Hispanic  38% of 35-64 year olds are foreign-born
  • 59. 59  In 2013, there were 67,883 seniors in Boston, making up 11% of the population – compared to a 13.6% population share in the greater Boston region  About 80% of the 65+ population is Black/African- American or White, with smaller Hispanic and Asian populations  35.3% of the 65+ population is foreign-born  In 2013, 26.4% of the 65 and over population spoke English less than very well  41.9% of those 65 and over were disabled in 2013  38.8% live alone, and 5.3% live in group quarters (such as nursing homes)  In 2013, 90.7% of the 65+ population reported living in the same house 1 year ago  Among the 9.3% who moved to a new home, the vast majority (8.1%) lived elsewhere in Massachusetts in the prior year Native 65% Foreign born 35% Nativity of Boston's 65+ Population White 57% Black/African- American 24% Hispanic 10% Asian 9% Racial/Ethnic Composition of Boston's 65+ Population 65+ POPULATION Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2009-2013 American Community Survey, Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), BRA Research Division Analysis
  • 61.  Households are made up of one or more persons (unrelated individuals or families) sharing a housing unit  Boston’s average household size fell significantly from 3.4 in 1950 to 2.4 in 1980 and remained steady through 2010  Since 1950, Boston’s average household size has been lower than that of the U.S. and the greater Boston region 61 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1950-2000 U.S. Decennial Census, 2006-2010 American Community Survey, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis 3.4 3.0 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 3.4 3.3 3.1 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.7 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Average Household Size (1950-2013) Boston USA ACS Estimates 2013
  • 62. 62 2.86 2.84 2.83 2.82 2.66 2.51 2.43 2.39 2.34 2.29 2.18 2.11 2.06 1.93 1.88 1.77 1.69 1.67 1.63 1.62 1.56 1.55 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Dorchester Mattapan East Boston Hyde Park Roslindale Roxbury Mission Hill Jamaica Plain West Roxbury Allston South Boston Charlestown Brighton South End South Boston Waterfront Downtown North End Beacon Hill Back Bay Fenway Longwood West End Average Household Size by Neighborhood (2013) Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis  Boston’s neighborhoods vary by average household size. In 2013, Dorchester, Mattapan, East Boston and Hyde Park had the highest average household sizes, while Back Bay, Fenway, Longwood and the West End had the lowest
  • 63. 63  The share of Boston’s population that is single, never-married, has been rising from 33.1% in 1950 to 56.4% in 2010 – considerably higher than the national share  The percentage of Boston’s population that is married has been falling proportionately, from 55.4% in 1950 to 31.9% in 2010 Note: Age 14+ for 1950-1970; Age 15+ for 1980-2010. Separated is included in married for 1950, 2000, & 2010. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Decennial Census 1950-2000, 2006-2010 American Community Survey, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis. 33.1% 33.5% 39.5% 47.2% 50.9% 50.5% 56.4% 56.6% 55.4% 51.2% 43.4% 33.9% 31.7% 36.6% 31.9% 31.4% 11.5% 15.3% 17.1% 18.9% 17.4% 12.9% 11.7% 12.0% 23.1% 22.1% 25.4% 26.3% 26.9% 27.1% 31.0% 33.1% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013 %of14/15+Population Marital Status of Boston's Population (1950-2013) Boston Single Boston Married Boston Widowed or Divorced U.S. Single
  • 64. 64  More people are living alone, and the average household size declined between 1960 and 1980  Only 32.4% of households have more than 2 people in 2013, down from 49.3% in 1960 Note: The slides on household and family composition begin in the year of first available data. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1960-2010 U.S. Decennial Census; 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis 23.9% 28.9% 36.8% 35.5% 37.1% 37.7% 38.0% 26.8% 28.7% 29.0% 29.5% 29.6% 31.1% 31.4% 17.3% 15.1% 13.9% 14.9% 14.3% 14.9% 14.7% 13.4% 10.9% 9.3% 10.3% 9.8% 9.8% 9.8% 8.9% 6.9% 5.4% 5.4% 5.3% 4.1% 3.8%9.6% 9.5% 5.6% 4.5% 3.9% 2.3% 2.4% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013 OccupiedHousingUnits Boston Households by Number of People (1960-2013) 1 person in unit 2 persons 3 persons 4 persons 5 persons 6 or more persons
  • 65. 65  A family or family household consists of a householder living with one or more other people related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption  The percentage of Boston households that are families has been consistently lower than the national average  This trend corresponds with the falling percentage of Boston residents who are married, and the falling share of children as a percentage of the population Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis 64.8% 53.3% 50.7% 48.1% 46.0% 77.4% 67.7% 64.0% 61.5% 60.0% 80.3% 73.2% 70.2% 68.1% 66.8% 47.2% 60.8% 66.4% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 %ofTotalHouseholds Family Households (1970-2013) Boston Greater Boston area United States ACS Estimates 2013
  • 66. 66  The percentage of family households that were headed by a married couple fell from 1970 to 1990. Since 1990, a little over half of family households have included a married couple Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis 72.5% 63.0% 58.6% 57.1% 55.5% 55.7% 4.9% 6.6% 8.3% 8.7% 9.0% 9.1% 22.6% 30.4% 33.1% 34.2% 35.5% 35.2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013 Family Households by Family Type (1970-2013) Married Unmarried Male Householder Unmarried Female Householder
  • 67. 67  The percentage of Boston households that include at least one person under age 18 has been falling and remains below national and regional levels Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1970-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis 31.6% 27.0% 24.8% 25.6% 22.9% 41.5% 33.0% 29.1% 30.7% 30.3% 44.1% 37.9% 33.6% 36.0% 33.5% 23.6% 29.8% 32.9% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Households with Children under 18 (1970-2013) Boston MAPC Region United States ACS Estimates 2013
  • 68. 68  Boston has a smaller percentage of households with a person over age 65 than either the Greater Boston region or the nation  In 2013, 38.8% of Boston residents 65 and over lived in a single-person household  52.7% of Boston seniors lived in family households in 2013 and 8.0% of them lived with a son or daughter Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000-2010 U.S. Decennial Census, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, BRA Research Division Analysis 18.9% 19.0% 19.6% 24.1% 23.6% 25.2% 23.4% 24.0% 25.5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 2000 2010 2013 %ofallhouseholds Households with person over age 65 Boston Greater Boston region United States