Call Girls Kengeri Satellite Town Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Gir...
The 7 Lessons Learned of Highly Effective Shared Services
1. (with apologies to Stephen R. Covey)
BC Financial Healthcare Professionals Society
2013 Conference| October 1, 2013 | Vancouver, BC
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
2. Who We Are
Definitions & Trends
Lessons Learned
2
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
3. Global Offices
Flexible Resource Model
Presentation handout is appended with
more information on Chazey Partners
3
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
4. 4
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
5. What is the
back office?
5
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
6. Decentralized
Challenges
Disparate
processes
Duplication of
effort
Different
control
environments
High cost and
costs unclear
across the
business
Not scalable
Shared
Benefits
Multiple
standards
Centralized
Responsive
to Business
and
Operational
needs
Business/
Operations
control
decisions
Customized
solutions to
meet
Business/
Operational
requirements
Highly client
focused
Commercially
driven
Service
Partnership
Agreements
Flexible
delivery
Clear
understanding
of drivers and
activities
Common
systems and
support
Consistent
standards
and controls
Economies of
scale
Challenges
Remote from
business
Unresponsive
and inflexible
No Business/
Operational
control over
costs
Viewed as
central
overhead
Prevalence of
shadow
operations
Tight control
environment
Clear unit costs
Benefits
6
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
7. Attribute
Shared Services
Centralization
Accountability
Business Unit
Corporate
Key Performance
Target
Service excellence
and continuous
improvement
Cost reduction and
central control
Service Partnership
Agreements
Widespread
Rare
Classification
An independent unit
Another corporate
function
Responsibility
Partnership
Demarcation
7
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
8. Shared Services is the organization that…
Employs a
specialist team
Geographically
unconstrained
Clientfocused
Providing services that are…
High quality
Non-core
High efficiency
Lower cost
Mission
critical
Repetitive or
professional
Achieve by leveraging…
Organizational
realignment
Technology
Best Practices
Standardization
8
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
10. Shared Services Concept started in mid 1980’s. Concept initially driven by
private sector multinationals
Shared Services and Outsourcing initiatives typically result in "cost savings of
20%-50% on processes in scope” (Hfs-PWC report June 2011)
"In today's business environment, nine out of every ten enterprises have
shared services and 97 percent manage outsourcing relationships". (HfsPWC report June 2011)
Mainly Finance driven early on in Europe/HR driven in North America
Captive vs Outsource, On-shore vs Near-shore vs Off-shore Now much more
end-to-end process focused
Continued increase in scale and up the value chain in Shared Services (e.g.
O2C, Reporting, Policy
Very important now in the Public Sector – how to reduce deficits while not
impacting front line services.
Economic recession of 2008 has led to austerity agenda today in public sector:
Shared Services is moving from opportunity to necessity
10
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
11. Technology options continue to grow (e.g. document management,
approvals, user self service, ERP, “cloud computing”, etc)
Politics around offshoring jobs has been an issue for years, but has not
stopped the trend (captive and BPO), although slowed for a while
Multi-functional Shared Services now really starting to happen after years
of this being in the textbooks
Large scale, multi-tower outsourcing not very common, despite what
many predicted.
Selective outsourcing (which actually never went away) is more the
trend “Innovative outsourcing” has not yet happened. Lift and shift
did. Partly due to client requirements.
Across all industry sectors the trend is towards shared services, hybrid
shared services organizations with some outsourcing, and
multifunctional shared services
11
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
16. Work step
BASELINE &
BENCHMARK
AS-IS
DESIGN, BUSINESS
CASE,
RECOMMENDATION
Proposed
Complete best Practice
diagnostics
Establish detailed plan,
timelines, key deliverables
etc. for this stage
Review and catalogue any
existing process & sub
processes
High level process design
Review output from work to
date
Review a catalogue technology
landscape
Initial Communications
Key Activities
Carry out multiple site visits and
workshops
Complete Activity based
Analysis
Project kick off &
mobilisation
Review and update baseline
Calculations
Opportunity Matrix
Business Case Evaluation
High level org design
Location
Recommendations(s)
Service delivery
framework
Recommend Governance
Framework
Define high level KPIs and
Metrics
Implementation Plan
Finalise stakeholders interviews
Develop high level
operating model
Change management Plan
Identification of next steps
Key
Deliverables
Review existing reporting tools
Complete Further
Finalise Technology
and mechanisms
Stakeholder interviews
assessment
0 to 2 weeks
2 to 4 weeks
4 to 5 weeks
Checkpoints with key stakeholders:
Project Board
Steering Group
Current State
Analysis:
Summary of Key
Findings & Gap
Analysis
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
Operating Model :
To Be Processes
& Organisational
Design
5 to 6 weeks
Recommendation,
Business Case &
Implementation
16
Plan
17. Observations
Leading Practice
As-Is (4.0)
Considered finance function, not part of procurement
Manual invoices
All payments in through single SAP ERP
Accounts payable responsibility centralized
Weekly cheque runs plus ad hoc
No statistical review of small invoices
Manual cheques infrequent
Achieve 50% of available vendor discounts
EFT not used
To-Be (8.0)
Achieve leading practices except:
Continue with manual invoices (initially no funding
for document management/scanning solution)
EFT only possible for 30% of vendors
Is part of an end-to-end purchase-to-pay process with
front end transactional processes designed to
minimize own stream error correction
Scan and route 100% of invoices when received by
accounts payable processing center
Process all payments through a single system.
Centralized accounts payable responsibilities across
the organization
Optimize number of check runs each month.
Review 100% of large dollar invoices and statistically
sample the remainder
Eliminate manual cheque request generation.
Maximize vendor discounts
Utilize EFT for payment to eliminate use of paper
cheques
Current
0
2
Future
4
6
Diagnostic Rating Scale:
North America | Latin
• | Leading Practice is not adopted
America 1 =Europe | Middle East
•
8
10
Score in Range 1-4
| Asia-Pacific
10 = Leading Practice is adopted in full
Score in Range 5-7
Score in Range 8-10
17
19. Account
Management
Client Contact
Management
Service Partnership
Agreements
• CSO to client; via reporting,
interaction, escalation &
communication
• Client to CSO; to manage
and resolve queries and
drive learning/improvement
• SPAs are 2-way agreements
clarifying both CSO services
and client inputs
Client Feedback
Continuous
Improvement
Process Control
Database
• Client satisfaction
continuously monitored
both informally and formally
• Mechanisms to identify the
areas for improvement and
to develop solutions
• Documents end-to-end CSO
processes; highlights activity
of both CSO & client
Performance
Measurement
Performance
Reporting
Recharging
Methodology
• Comprehensive KPIs,
measures and metrics
framework, CSO & client
• Process performance will be
reviewed monthly by CSO
and client
• Define basis for charging for
CSO services to turn
consumers into clients
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
19
22. Type of Activity
Characteristics
Transactional & • Results more quantifiable
Administrative • Processes benefit greatly from standardization,
•
•
Professional &
Technical
•
•
•
•
Policy &
Strategic
•
•
•
Examples
automation and technology
Clear linkage between effort and results
(outputs generally experienced in short-term)
Generally not client-facing
•
•
•
•
•
•
Accounts payable
Payroll
IT service desk
Fleet management
Facilities management
Mailroom
Results are more qualitative
Standardization, automation and technology
have less of an impact
Relationship between effort and results is not
as clear (medium-term perspective)
Generally requires interaction with client
•
•
•
•
•
•
Procurement advisory
Recruiting/staffing
IT applications
Health & safety
Space planning
End user training
Distant relationship between effort and results
(long-term perspective)
Standardization, automation and technology
are not significant factors
Clear linkage to strategic goals of organization
•
•
Signing authority policy
Business & strategic
planning
22
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
26. We provide advice, guidance, support and implementation
expertise, covering strategy setting, business case production,
program management, outsourcing assessment, process
optimization, technology enablement, training and change
management.
Our functional breadth of experience includes the “big four” of HR,
Finance, IT and Procurement, plus other support services such as
Facilities, Real Estate, Legal, Communications, etc.
Example clients include Coca Cola Hellenic, Coca Cola Enterprises,
Government of New Brunswick, Agrium, May Gurney, Gilead
Sciences, Interior Health, Northern Health, Lawrence Berkeley
Laboratory, FormFactor, National University of Ireland, Bridgestone,
Gerdau, and many others.
Because we are passionate business people and Shared Service
practitioners, we care about your success and deliver solutions
relevant to your organization.
26
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
27. We have serviced a great variety of clients across many industries and countries,
covering Shared Services and Outsourcing, Business Transformation and Technology
Enablement.
Due to the unique nature of working within the Public Sector and with Non-Profits, we
wanted to specifically highlight the following organizations and experience below:
New Brunswick Internal Services Agency, New Brunswick, Canada
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California
Interior Health and Northern Health, British Columbia, Canada
Stanford University
University College Galway in Ireland, Ireland
The World Wildlife Fund
The International Baccalaureate
National Health Services (NHS), UK
Health Service Executive (Ireland)
Non-Departmental Public Bodies (NDPBs)
Ministry of Defense (MOD)
South Yuba River Citizens League
Outsourced Services to Local Authorities
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
27
28. Phil Searle, Grant Farrell, Chas Moore and Janey Jux have chaired, arranged,
presented at and facilitated workshops at a number of Public Sector Shared
Services events, including the following:
•
Shared Services in the Public Sector at the Queen Elizabeth II Conference
Centre in London
•
Chaired, presented at and help organize the Shared Services and Outsourcing
Network‘s first North American Public Sector shared Services Conference, held
in Chicago in November 2011
•
Presented at and helped organize the Shared Services and Outsourcing
Network’s second North American Public Sector Shared Services Conference,
held in Chicago in November 2012
•
Delivered a master class at the “Managing Change – Transforming the Public
Sector” conference at the Barbican Centre, London 2011
•
Chaired and presented at the 2012 “Power of Collaboration” conference for
financial professionals in BC Healthcare at Vancouver, Canada
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
28
29. Public Sector Shared Services and “Collaboration vs. Sharing”. Phil Searle, CEO Chazey Partners
What might be the Impact of the 2012 Presidential Election on Shared Services and Outsourcing in
the US Public Sector? Phil Searle, CEO Chazey Partners
Are you getting the SPA treatment? Chas Moore, Managing Director, Canada
From front to back office. Grant Farrell, Managing Director, United States
Proactively managing your stakeholders. Janey Jux, Head of EMEA Public Sector Practice
Make or Buy Decision. Phil Searle, CEO Chazey Partners
What are Shared Services Best Practices? Phil Searle, CEO Chazey Partners
When is Shared Services not really Shared Services? Janey Jux, Head EMEA Public Sector Practice
Business Continuity Planning. Grant Farrell, Managing Director, United States
Client Relationship Management Framework. Grant Farrell, Managing Director, United States
Deploying Shared Services. Grant Farrell, Managing Director, United States
Developing the Business Case. Chas Moore, Managing Director, Canada
Shared Services Optimization. Phil Searle, CEO Chazey Partners
Technology Enablement. Grant Farrell, Managing Director, United States
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
29
30. Chazey Partners’ Profile • What We Do
Business Transformation
We help clients to transform their
support functions to realise
significant benefits (lower costs,
optimised working capital and
improved performance) through
best practice process development
and roll out of optimal organisation,
support and delivery structures.
Functional scope covering Finance,
HR, IT and Procurement
Identify and target opportunities,
and produce powerful business
cases to reflect the opportunity and
gain organisational buy in
Implement and support approved
transformation initiatives rapidly to
drive maximum ROI
Effective acquisition integration and
business divestitures
Powerful project and change
management, focussing on delivery
and outcomes
Shared Services
Planning for, resourcing and
implementing global and regional
Shared Service Organisations (SSOs)
covering a wide ranges of functions
and processes including offshore
solutions
Turning round sub optimal or failing
SSOs
Statutory and Fiscal compliance
delivered by SSOs for multiple
countries and legal jurisdictions
Independent of any outsourcing
providers, we offer impartial
sourcing advice and support
covering both internal and external
options, to ensure that the best
solutions for your business are
found
Training and development for
Shared Service practitioners and
Shared Service customers
Technology Enablement
Implement and optimise ERP and
other technology enablement
solutions to maximise return on
investment and in quick time.
Focussing on needs and value to the
business, we view technology as an
enabler and not an end in itself.
Resource technology projects to
enhance chance of success through
an optimal mix of IT, Business
Systems Analysts, Business Process
Integration, Business Process
Owners, and Users
State of the art additional
technology enablement where
required
Effective training and support
Experience includes SAP, Oracle, JD
Edwards, BAAN, Siebel, Peoplesoft,
COINS and many others
30
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
31. Chas Moore
Managing Director, Chazey Partners Canada
chasmoore@chazeypartners.com
Mobile: 250-469-4168
Toll-Free: 1-855-5-SHARED
Janet Garland
Associate, Chazey Partners Canada
janetgarland@chazeypartners.com
Mobile: 250-762-2501
Toll-Free: 1-855-5-SHARED
North America | Latin America | Europe | Middle East | Asia-Pacific
Notas do Editor
Established 8 years ago in early 2006Global consulting firm based out of the United KingdomOffices in Canada, US, Mexico, Argentina, UK, Ireland, Cyprus and SingaporeDynamic firm made of people who have “lived and breathed” shared services, business transformation and technology implementationsFor a significant number of years and range of industriesWe use a flexible resource model, matching external resources with internal team membersBoth full-time and staff and sub-contractorsFacilitates buy-in and knowledge transferEnables a sustainable solutionKeeps consulting costs lowApproach is uniqueIndependent of any outsourcing providers, so can offer impartial sourcing advice and support
Questions for discussion:What are the functions?How does it differ from “Front Office”Different Types of Public Sector EntitiesAre there significant differences in Back Office functions?Centralization or Shared Services?Mission Critical, non-core activities
In the United States the President’s Management Agenda directs federal agencies to fulfill goals with maximum efficiency. The US office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued directives advised turning to shared services to meet these directives. Australia and New Zealand have Shared Services operating at the federal and local government levels. For example, Auckland Health Board consolidated back-office function that supports major hospitals.In Mexico, the Ministries of Public Service, Agrarian Reform and of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries and Food joined in a program in mid-2009 for the implementation of a Shared Service Centre that included the redesign of processes and the development a GRP (Government Resource Planning - ERP for Government) that will support all in scope processes. UK Home Office and the UK Ministry of Justice are saving budget through their Shared Service Programs. The Home Office has reported savings of £13m per annum and Ministry of Justice reports £20m per annum. In the UK up to 40% of local authorities (in 2011) were bringing forward their plans to move to a shared model. At the end of 2011, 219 councils across the country were engaged in 143 shared service arrangements resulting in £156.5 million of efficiency savings.US large Federal Agencies that have either completed or are in the process of creating shared services include the United States Post Office and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). NASA is saving more than $12 million per year in back office services in order to move funding to mission-critical space exploration.The US Department of Heath and Human Services (DHHS) Shared Services “Program Support Center” (PSC) provides support services to all components of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and other Federal government agencies worldwide. PSC has a broad range of nearly 60 services and products, which include: administrative operations, health resources, information technology support, financial management, and strategic acquisitionsThe National Business Center of the Department of Transportation (DOT) is providing IT services to the DOT and other federal agencies. The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Finance Center (NFC) in New Orleans, La., has implemented shared services to streamline the provision of payroll and human resources for 60,000 government employees in 174 civilian agencies.The Government of Ontario launched its IT transformation initiative in 1998. It reports that at maturity it saves $100 million annually, representing 10% of the total IT spending, and between 20–25% of IT infrastructure spending. The Government of British Columbia began its IT consolidation in 2002 and has reduced its data centers from over 100 to 2 in 2011. It further reports that energy costs are expected to be 50% lower.The Government of Australia has developed a data centre strategy to consolidate data centers, which support over a hundred agencies, from 2010 to 2025. Anticipates avoiding $1 billion in future costsThe Government in Ireland is actively pursuing Shared Services for the Public Sector, as outlined in its Public Sector Reform White Paper, November 2011
10 years ago needed to explain what Shared Services isThere have been several good, bad and ugly examples in the meantimeSome of the best examples of Shared Services do not have Shared Services in their name – eg. New Brunswick Internal Services Agency, BC Public Service AgencySome high profile initiatives with Shared Services in their name have nothing shared about them (rebranding of centralization initiatives)The term Shared Services now comes with baggageSeeing other terms: Common Services, Business Services, Internal Services
If you are on a personal journey of discovery, you may decide to take a random trip and see where it leaves youThis is not a recipe for a success transformation in businessYou need a flight plan, or in other words, a business caseThe business caseProvides the economic justification and overall change rationaleDescribes the recommended future state and high-level implementation plan Has two key purposes:1) Achieve executive buy-in and program sign-off to advance to Design, Build and Deploy phases2) Act as an essential control mechanism for the entire project upon which its success will be measured and evaluatedThe activities and deliverables in a leading practices business case are provided on the next slide
No Customer, No Shared ServicesNeed to identify your customer, both internal and externalWant customers, not consumersNeed to define and measure customer satisfactionThe way the customer interacts with the process will transform as wellAdapt rather than adoptSelf-serviceTechnology and automationNeed to measure both input and output KPIs to drive continuous improvementGarbage in, garbage outIf there is a problem with the process, need to understand input/customer roleImplement 9 elements of Customer Interaction Framework
We have all heard about the importance of Change Management and Communications for a projectOne doesn’t fully appreciate the importance until it isn’t there when you need itA powerful analogy I heard was about providing air cover for your team that is on the groundGood change management and communications allows your team to get on with the transformation and detailed workWithout it, the stakeholders will be putting up barriers, disengaging, and causing problems for the teamThe team will spend time explaining themselves, justifying methodology and otherwise doing change management on an ad hoc basisYou need to invest in change management and start it before the teams arrive onsiteCommunications is a critical part of change managementEmail is a necessary evil, but email is not communicationNothing replaces face-to-face discussion, whether one-on-one with key stakeholders or in larger workshop sessionsYou need a clear purposeIf it takes multiple slides to explain your purpose, you do not have oneAll team members need to have the standardized elevator speech ready
Need a manageable scope to reduce risk and complexityThe standard approach is to look at services in three categories:Transactional & AdministrativeProfessional & TechnicalPolicy & StrategyCategories share similar characteristics in terms of job classifications, interaction with client, and the impact of standardization, automation and technologyThe lowest risk approach is to start with Transactional & Administrative servicesFoundation for the business; if not working business stops: cannot pay staff, no cash flow, unable to pay vendorsUntil optimized, cannot properly assess professional & technical as these value-added services are caught up in transactional issuesEasier to manage the downstream impact while stabilizing, providing time to prove new modelTrack record of success in public and private sector based on starting with transactional & administrativeBenefits most from automation, standardization & technologyOnce stabilize Transactional & Administrative: consider moving up the value chain into Professional & Technical Services
Structure can be an enabler or barrierImportant to put transformation in organization that can operate independently with its own budget authoritySeparate transformation from ongoing operations until new CSO is ready to take overClean start that doesn’t weigh down CSO with existing structural issues (eg. non-standardized job descriptions)More control on who goes into new organizationClear baseline to enable reporting on results of transformationClear accountabilities to enable transformationEnable culture changeProvides more permanence and resilience to subsequent structural changesGovernance and structure can be designed to accommodate changes in scopeOther structure considerationsCo-locate staffMake initiative high profile and mandatoryDesign on end-to-end processes and break down silosGet control of the budgetWe’ll talk about the GNB Case Study, as it is a good example on how structure was an enabler
We are often put into a situation where we are assigned to a project and told to get on with itYou do not have to do it alone, in fact you are making your life a lot hard if you doFind the internal change agents in your organizationLiaise with those with institutional knowledgeConsider bringing in outside helpShared Services is not a core public sector skillRisk that will do more of the sameLeverage of experience, capacity and independence of consultantsIf you do use consultants, ensure that they are focused on knowledge transferExternal consultants should be matched with internal teamWorking together on the deliverablesImproved buy-inEnsure that solution reflects your environment and is not simply their standard, prescribed approachSustainable solution that lasts after consultants have left