2. USAIS
Mission: Provide the operational force with adaptive and innovative Infantry
Soldiers and leaders that embody the Warrior ethos and are trained and developed
in Infantry skills, ready today to support our Army at war, and relevant to
tomorrow’s fight.
Key Tasks:
Commandant, IN School
• Develop resilient and adaptive
Infantry Soldiers
• Provide a Realistic /Relevant
Training Environment
• Ensure USAIS employs
Professional Cadre
• Develop Infantry Leaders & Soldiers
Committed to the Profession of
Arms
• Instill the Warrior Ethos
FOLLOW ME!
Chief of Infantry
• Be the voice of the Infantry
branch during Army
Reorganization.
• Maintain viable Infantry forces to
support Army, Joint, and DoD
Operational Requirements
• Develop Infantry Officers and
NCOs to successfully fill CSL
Billets in BCTs
• Define Individual and Leader
KSAOs for the Infantry Force
• Develop Individual Infantry
AOC/MOS Professional
Development Standards
Deputy Commanding General
Infantry (DCG-I)
• Ensure that FBGA continues to be
a safe environment for Soldiers,
civilians, and families
• Champion improvement initiatives
that increase MCoE capabilities
•Validate Soldier Enhanced
Capabilities to meet requirements of
BCT 2020
• Be an ambassador for all visitors
on and off the installations
•Ensure the MCoE meets all Army
Requirements
USAIS Vision:
“…Regardless of the platform in which the Infantry arrives to battle,
what emerges from those platforms are well-trained, well-led, and
well-equipped infantrymen that are extraordinary physically fit
warrior/athletes, precision marksmen, and are prepared to execute
warrior tasks and battle drills.”
-- BG David Haight, Oct 2012
3. Commandant, IN School
Key Tasks:
Commandant, IN School
• Increased Course Rigor
• USAIS Training Load
FOLLOW ME!
Chief of Infantry
• Soldier 2020 (KSAO)
• Leader Development
timeline (Officer/NCO)
• IN Force Structure
Deputy Commanding General
Infantry (DCG-I)
• IBCT CPR Methodology
• Mobility Dilemma
• MWFC Survey
USAIS Vision:
“…Regardless of the platform in which the Infantry arrives to battle,
what emerges from those platforms are well-trained, well-led, and
well-equipped infantrymen that are extraordinary physically fit
warrior/athletes, precision marksmen, and are prepared to execute
warrior tasks and battle drills.”
-- BG David Haight, Oct 2012
4. Increased Course Rigor
• OCS: Physical Training
Requirements
• IBOLC:
– 17 Wk POI (ASAT and Heavy
Weapons)
• NCOA:
• Increased Field Training
• ALC Self-Study Program
(SSP)
– Combined Arms Focus
• Master Gunner – Home Station
Pre-requisite Training
– Leader Challenge Vignettes
• ASLTE – ASAT in Sniper
• Ranger:
– Demolition training re-added
– Combatives training re-added
– Stryker introduced
– AC-130
5. USAIS Training Load
Course
Airborne
OSUT
Ranger
IBOLC
Pathfinder
Jumpmaster
MLC
Sniper
IMLC
RSLC
BFV MG
Total
FY 2013 FY 2016 Delta
17556
11027 -6529
19797
20757
960
3246
3000
-246
1718
1548
-170
657
600
-57
581
440
-141
506
200
-306
463
405
-58
400
200
-200
375
325
-50
240
200
-40
45539
38702 -6837
%
-37%
5%
-8%
-10%
-9%
-24%
-60%
-13%
-50%
-13%
-17%
-15%
Training Seat vacancies are the primary cause for future FY reductions
and not due to sequestration. MTSS dollars remain available to train.
6. Chief of Infantry
Key Tasks:
Commandant, IN School
• Increased Course Rigor
• USAIS Training Load
FOLLOW ME!
Chief of Infantry
• Soldier 2020 (KSAO)
• Leader Development
timeline (Officer/NCO)
• IN Force Structure
Deputy Commanding General
Infantry (DCG-I)
• IBCT CPR Methodology
• Mobility Dilemma
• MWFC Survey
USAIS Vision:
“…Regardless of the platform in which the Infantry arrives to battle,
what emerges from those platforms are well-trained, well-led, and
well-equipped infantrymen that are extraordinary physically fit
warrior/athletes, precision marksmen, and are prepared to execute
warrior tasks and battle drills.”
-- BG David Haight, Oct 2012
7. Soldier 2020 (KSAO)
(Determination Methodology)
Purpose: To inform development of the Army’s diversity
inclusion strategy by identifying mitigation strategies to
overcome institutional and cultural barriers and
implementation issues.
• Review of Existing Physical Demands
• Crosswalk Combined Arms Training Strategies to
Critical Task List
• Determine the physical components of specific tasks
(Lift, pull, carry, etc.)
• Update based on operational environment, latest
technology, and current Soldier equipment.
8. Soldier Load (Fighting)
Uniform
Boots
ACU
Multi tool
Rigger Belt
Patches
Patrol Cap
ID Tags
Undershirt
Gloves
Eye Pro
Notebook
Drawers
Socks
Wrist Watch
Ear Plugs
Chapstick
ID Card
12.4 lbs
Average Soldier Weight 188 lbs
Average Infantry SFC Weight 180 lbs
Personal Protective Equipment and Weapon (PPE)
IOTV w/ neck/groin protector
(Size Large)
Enhanced Small Arms Protective
Inserts (Size Large)
Enhanced Side Ballistic Insert set
with Side Plate Carrier
100 oz Hydration system ( With Water)
Fighting Load Carrier
30 round magazine pouch (3 x 0.25)
Hand grenade pouch (2) with (2) M67
Fragmentation Grenades
Lensatic Compass w/case
Individual First Aid Kit (IIFAK)
Mag light flashlight w/2 ea AA battery
Infrared signal beacon, PHOENIX
w/Battery
Ballistic Knee/Elbow Pads
Visual/Language Translator Card
Casualty Feeder Report/Witness Statement Advanced Combat
Helmet (ACH)
band
Helmet Cover w/camouflage cover
Night Vision goggle mounting plate
Ballistic Protection Goggles (ESS)
M4 Carbine w/fully loaded magazine
M68- CCO w/ battery
3 point sling
Back-Up Iron Sight
M-4 RAS & Fwd Pistol Grip
5.56mm
Magazine with 30 rounds each (6 ea) Sure Fire light w/
battery
PAQ-4C w/batteries
70.4 lbs
8
9. Soldier Load (<24 hour Sustainment)
<24 hr Sustainment Load
Assault Pack w/ waist pack
2QT Canteen w/Cover and Sling w/water
Liner Poncho
Poncho
Improved Rain suit Top
Improved Rain suit Bottom
Neck Gaiter
Meal Ready To Eat 1 ea (1.50/0.68 kg)
Undershirt moisture wicking x 1 ea
Socks x 1 pr
Improved Cleaning Kit
Flexi Cuffs (4 large per soldier)
Chemlight (2per)
Water purification tablets
Camo Face Paint
VS17 Panel (small)
19.3 lbs
Uniform
PPE
+ <24 Hr Sustainment Load
12.4* lbs
70.4* lbs
19.3* lbs
Approach March Load 102.1* lbs
9
10. MOS 11B Infantryman
Physical Demands (Former)
Frequently visually identifies vehicles, equipment, and individuals at long
distances.
Frequently digs, lifts, and shovels 21 pounds scoops of dirt in bent,
stooped or kneeling position.
Occasionally raises and carries
160 pounds person on back.
Frequently performs all other
tasks while carrying a minimum
of 65 pounds, evenly distributed
over entire body.
Frequently walks, runs, crawls,
and climbs over varying terrain
for a distance of up to 25 miles.
Frequently runs for short
distances.
Physical Demands (Updated)
Frequently visually identifies vehicles and equipment at 1000 meters and individuals at 300 meters. (SL 1-4)
Frequently digs, lifts, and shovels 11 pounds scoops of dirt in bent, stooped or kneeling position. (SL 1-4)
Occasionally drags 270 pound person 15 meters. (SL 1-4)
Constantly performs all other tasks while carrying a
minimum of 82 pounds, evenly distributed over entire body.
(SL 1-4)
Frequently walks, runs, crawls, and climbs over varying
terrain and altitude changes for a distance of up to 15 miles,
during a 24 hour period, while carrying 103 pounds evenly
distributed over entire body, after which Soldier must retain
the ability to perform all other physical requirements. (SL 14)
Frequently rise from a prone, kneeling, or crouched position,
sprint for 3 to 5 seconds while carrying a minimum of 82
pounds, evenly distributed over entire body, then returning to
a prone, kneeling, or crouched position. Repeating for a
distance of no less than 100 meters. (SL 1-4)
Frequently lifts 89 pounds 5 feet.
Frequently lifts 107 pounds 5 feet as part of a two Soldier team. (SL 1-4)
Occasionally carries 153 pounds 10 meters.
Occasionally carries 153 pounds 10 meters as part of a two Soldier team. (SL 1-2)
Frequently lifts 55 pounds over head.
Occasionally lifts 65 pounds vertically 5-6 feet in the air. (SL 1-2)
Frequently lowers 58 pounds 3 feet.
Frequently lifts, lowers, and moves laterally 59 pounds 3 feet while seated. (SL 1-4)
Frequently lifts and lowers 32 pounds bags shoulder high.
Frequently lifts and lowers 40-pound bags shoulder high. (SL 1-4)
Frequently throws 1-pound object 40 meters.
Frequently throws 1 pound object 35 meters. (SL 1-4)
Frequently lifts 55 pounds 3 feet high, moves laterally 5 feet and places object
in tube.
Frequently lifts 65 pounds 3 feet high, moves laterally 5 feet and places object in tube. (SL 1-2)
Frequently lifts 45 pounds waist high.
Frequently lifts 45 pounds waist high and carries it up to 15 meters. (SL 1-4)
10
14. Infantry Force Structure
(Active Component)
2013
2017
43 BCTs
32 BCTs
(15 ABCT 20 IBCT 8 SBCT)
(9 ABCT 15 IBCT 8 SBCT)
61,776 Infantry Soldiers
(3,774 / 58,002)
60,386 (-3%) Infantry Soldiers
(3,639 / 56,747)
(-4% / -2%)
• 40 IN Only BN Commands
• 97 IN/AR BN Commands
• 39 IN Only BN Commands
• 86 IN/AR BN Commands
Loss of 12 BN Opportunities
• 64 IN Only BN CSM
• 50 IN/AR BN CSM
• 63 IN Only BN CSM
• 44 IN/AR BN CSM
Loss of 7 BN Opportunities
As of 6 Sep 13
15. FY 13 Active Component Operational Units
Korea
Germany
Italy
Current Endstrength +/- 547K
2014 Goal: 520K
A
2017 Goal: ≤490K
I
S
Ft Lewis
2 3 4
S
S
S
I
x
I
I
Ft Drum
3
Ft Carson
A A A
I
1 2 4Ft Riley
I
I
I
I
I
I
S
S
Ft Wainwright
I
1
Schofield Barracks
Ft Bliss
A
Ft Richardson
4
I
A
2
3
S
I
A
A
A
Ft Polk
Ft Hood
4
A
I
S
I
Ft Bragg
Ft Benning
1
I
I
Ft Campbell
A A I
Ft Irwin
Ft Knox
Ft Stewart
A
A
I
S
43 Brigade Combat Teams
94 Maneuver Battalions
15
16. FY 17 Active Component Operational Units
Korea
Germany
Italy
2017 Goal: ≤490K
I
S
Ft Lewis
1 2
S
S
I
I
Ft Drum
Ft Carson
A S I
Ft Knox
Ft Riley
A A
Ft Irwin
I
1
S
S
Ft Wainwright
A
Ft Polk
Ft Hood
2
3
S
I
A
I
I
I
4
I
A
1
Schofield Barracks
Ft Bliss
A
Ft Richardson
4
I
A
I
Ft Campbell
I
Ft Bragg
I
Ft Benning
Ft Stewart
A
I
S
32 Brigade Combat Teams
93 Maneuver Battalions
16
17. Dep. Commanding General
Infantry
Key Tasks:
Commandant, IN School
• Increased Course Rigor
• USAIS Training Load
FOLLOW ME!
Chief of Infantry
• Soldier 2020 (KSAO)
• Leader Development
timeline (Officer/NCO)
• IN Force Structure
Deputy Commanding General
Infantry (DCG-I)
• IBCT CPR Methodology
• Mobility Dilemma
• MWFC Survey
USAIS Vision:
“…Regardless of the platform in which the Infantry arrives to battle,
what emerges from those platforms are well-trained, well-led, and
well-equipped infantrymen that are extraordinary physically fit
warrior/athletes, precision marksmen, and are prepared to execute
warrior tasks and battle drills.”
-- BG David Haight, Oct 2012
18. IBCT CPR
(Assessment and Recommendations)
IBCT Strengths
Strategic Mobility
Operations in Restrictive Terrain
Low Sustainment Requirement
Forcible Entry Operations
Joint/Multinational Interoperability
IBCT Weaknesses
Operational Depth and Tempo
Tactical Mobility and Agility
Firepower
Mission Command
Protection and Sustainment in all
environments
Recommended Investment Priorities:
Operational Depth and Tempo
Organizational improvements
Reconnaissance and Security enhancements
Joint Integration Initiatives
Tactical Mobility and Agility
Reducing Soldier/Squad Load
Tactical Wheeled Vehicle Strategy
IED Detection Capabilities
Firepower
Dsmt Lethality / Small Arms Strategy
Precision Fires Enhancements
Mobile Protected Firepower Dev.
Mission Command
Nett Warrior / Network Enhancements
Sustainment and Protection
Small Unit Power Sust. Initiatives
Sustainment Capacity in Austere Environments
Counter-Unmanned Aerial Systems Strategy
Integrated DOTMLPF initiatives will improve IBCT combat effectiveness
18
19. IBCT Mission and Operational Context
BCT Mission:
Disrupt or destroy enemy forces, control land areas including populations
and resources and conduct combat operations to protect US national
interests.
(SRC 77300R400)
IBCTs:
• Operate as part of a joint force
• Conduct Unified Land Operations under mission cmd of Div and Corps
• Depend on joint and Echelons Above Brigade assets
(Joint Operational Access Concept; AOC; Mvmt & Mnvr Functional Concept)
IBCT Standardized METL (Apr 13)
Current
FDUs
The IBCT’s ability to deploy rapidly and operate in complex terrain
distinguish it from other brigade combat teams.
Derived from FM 3-90.6, The Bde Cbt Tm & TRADOC Pam 525-3-6 Mvmt
& Mnvr Concept
* Subject to change pending
approval of CAV SQDN FDU
2020 Design
19
20. Mobility Dilemma
- Strategic Mobility
+ Tactical Mobility
+ Strategic Mobility
- Tactical Mobility
IBCT
(SBCT?)
ABCT
GCV
Replaces
M2 Bradley
JLTV
Replaces
HMMWV
AMPV
Replaces
M113
LRV
Light Tank
Vehicle for IBCT CAV SQDN
Supports IBCT in Force Entry Role
21. MWFC #11
“Developing resilient and adaptive Soldiers and units to operate effectively in
environments of complexity and persistent danger.”
14a. What echelon is currently the
most effective in understanding the
principles of Mission Command
to support brigade operations?
60%
36%
20%
0%
60%
50%
40%
0%
SQD PLT
40%
0%
CO
41%
27%
20%
14%
0%
14b. What echelon should be the most
effective in understanding the
principles of Mission Command
to support brigade operations?
BN BDE
18%
14%
0%
SQD PLT
CO
BN BDE
Takeaway: Need Increased Mission Command Capabilities at Company and
Platoon Levels
21
24. Personal Staff
Commanding General
Maneuver Center of Excellence
IG
PAO
SJA
MCoE
CSM
MCoE
DCG
Chaplain
CIG
FBGA
PAO
Special Staff
SACG
FBGA Garrison
Command
G1
G2
DHR
US Army Infantry
School
( USAIS )
G3
DPTMS
US Army Armor
School
(USAARMS )
NCOA
Maneuver SLC
OCOI
Ranger
Training Brigade
OCOA
*192
IN - ALC
IN BDE
11 B /11 C ALC
IN Functional
DSTE
198 IN BDE
11 B /C OSUT
199 IN BDE
BOLC I
I - BOLC III
Airborne
194 AR BDE
19 D /K OSUT
91 A /M AIT
DSTE
19 K /19 D ALC
91 A /M ALC
Warrior Leader
Course
316 CAV BDE
A - BOLC III
AR Functional
Inter Student Ofc
DSTE
NCOA - WLC
• Fort Bragg
• Fort Drum
• Fort Stewart
*192 IN BDE is assigned to USAARMS but retains the Infantry blue color to reflect the unit’s Branch heritage
MCoE Organization
NETCOM Organization
IMCOM Organization
TACOM Organization
AMC Organization
EO
Retention
Safety
USAF LNO
HHC, MCoE
G4
G6
DOL
NEC
DOT
Tactics Instr
Division
MCCC
Combined Arms
Integration
Division
QAO
USMC LNO
Magazine
Foreign Svc
LNOs
MCoE Band
G8
DRM
DOTS
DPW
DFMWR
DOTD
CDID
Plans and
Operations
Division
Training
Development
Division
Int & Synch
Office
Support
Operations
Division
Publication
Support
Division
BCT
AR - ALC
197 IN BDE
Protocol
Museum
MCoE HQ
Chief of Staff
SGS
Supply and
Services
Division
Doctrine and
Collective Tng
Division
Lessons Learned
Ground System
Material Management
Directorate
Concepts
Development
Division
Soldier
Requirements
Division
Mounted
Requirements
Division
Maneuver Battle
Lab
TRADOC
Capability Mgr
HBCT SBCT
IBCT
BFSB
Soldier
BCT Mission Cmd
25
25. (23 July 2013)
Infantry
Armor
MCoE
Not Branch Specific
Core Organizations that
Perform Core
Missions/Functions
Special Staff
Museum
LRC
USAARMS
USAIS
CDID
194th Bde
316th Bde
199th Bde
198th Bde
Ranger Training Bde
Dept
Tng & Doct Develop
Concept
Development Div
Dept
DOTS
19K AR OSUT BN
USMC Det & 91A/M
1-81st (6 Co)
1-16th (4 Cos)
BN
Provost (4 Co)
11B/C OSUT BN
1-19th (5 Co)
RTBn
4th RTB (4 Co)
Management
Staff (PMO)
Soldier Division
Support Opns
1-29th (5 Cos)
ABOLC BN
2-16th (4 Co)
11B/C OSUT BN
1-50th (6 Co)
Training Dev Div
Mounted
Requirements Div
Supply & Services
Doctrine & Collective
Tng Div
Maneuver Battle Lab
Material
Management
Publication Support
Div
TCMs x 4
FMX Maint
(AMC)
19D CAV OSUT BN
5-15th (6 Trp)
Basic Tng BN
1-46th (5 Co)
Basic Tng BN
2-47th (5 Co)
Reception BN
30th AG (5 Co)
3-16th (4 Cos)
ARC/CLC
AR IET SPT
IN OSUT SPT
RSLC
IBOLC BN
2-11th (4 Co)
OCS/DCC BN
3-11th (5 Co)
DOT
MCCC/PCC/CAID
NCOA
(SLC/ALC/WLC)
w/FLT Co
11B/C OSUT BN
2-19th (6 Co)
11B/C OSUT BN
2-54th (6 Co)
11B/C OSUT BN
2-58th (6 Co)
RTBn
5th RTB (4 Co)
RTBn
6th RTB (4 Co)
ABN BN
1-507th (6 Co)
Staff & Faculty Div
26
27. MWFC #1
“Developing and sustaining a high degree of situational understanding while operating in
complex environments against determined, adaptive enemy organizations”
1a. What echelon is currently the most
effective in understanding the
Enemy Situation in a complex
environment to support brigade
operations?
60%
60%
40%
30%
20%
0%
-20%
1b. What echelon should be the most
effective in understanding the
Enemy Situation in a complex
environment to support brigade
operations?
0%
30%
36%
SQD PLT
40%
20%
4%
CO
BN BDE
48%
0%
30%
11%
7%
4%
SQD PLT
CO
BN BDE
Takeaway:
28
28. MWFC #1
“Developing and sustaining a high degree of situational understanding while operating in
complex environments against determined, adaptive enemy organizations”
2a. What echelon is currently the most
effective in communicating the
Enemy Situation in a complex
environment to support brigade
operations?
60%
60%
41%
40%
37%
0%
4%
SQD PLT
0%
CO
BN BDE
37%
40%
20%
19%
20%
0%
2b. What echelon should be the most
effective in communicating the
Enemy Situation in a complex
environment to support brigade
operations?
-20%
15%
19%
26%
4%
SQD PLT
CO
BN BDE
Takeaway:
29
29. MWFC #1
“Developing and sustaining a high degree of situational understanding while operating in
complex environments against determined, adaptive enemy organizations”
3a. What echelon is currently the most
effective in the ability to detect
changes in the Enemy Situation in
order to make tactical decisions in a
timely manner to support brigade
operations?
60%
26%
20%
0%
60%
44%
40%
11%
40%
19%
20%
26%
30%
7%
22%
15%
0%
0%
SQD PLT
3b. What should be the most effective
in the ability to detect changes in
the Enemy Situation in order to
make tactical decisions in a timely
manner to support brigade
operations?
CO
BN BDE
-20%
SQD PLT
CO
BN BDE
Takeaway:
30
30. MWFC #2
“Conducting effective air-ground combined arms reconnaissance to rapidly develop the
situation in close contact with the enemy and civilian populations. ”
4a. What echelon is currently the most
effective in conducting effective airground operations/reconnaissance
to develop the Enemy Situation to
support brigade operations?
60%
16%
20%
0%
60%
44%
40%
24%
40%
16%
CO
BN BDE
28%
20%
0%
0%
SQD PLT
4b. What echelon should be the most
effective in conducting effective airground operations/reconnaissance
to develop the Enemy Situation to
support brigade operations?
-20%
36%
24%
12%
0%
SQD PLT
CO
BN BDE
Takeaway:
31
31. MWFC #2
“Conducting effective air-ground combined arms reconnaissance to rapidly develop the
situation in close contact with the enemy and civilian populations. ”
5a. What echelon is currently the most
effective in conducting air-ground
operations/reconnaissance to
develop the situation of the civilian
population (human terrain) to
support brigade operations?
60%
60%
36%
40%
20%
0%
-20%
5b. What echelon should be the most
effective in conducting air-ground
operations/reconnaissance to
develop the situation of the civilian
population (human terrain) to
support brigade operations?
36%
40%
16%
12%
0%
SQD PLT
CO
44%
BN BDE
28%
16%
20%
0%
12%
0%
SQD PLT
CO
BN BDE
Takeaway:
32
32. MWFC #3
“Conducting maneuver and integrate all arms and joint capabilities to seize and retain
the initiative and defeat capable, determined enemy organizations in all types of terrain
including dense urban areas (includes offense and defense). ”
6a. What echelon is currently the most
effective in conducting joint
operations?
60%
60%
40%
28%
20%
0%
-20%
0%
SQD PLT
CO
60%
44%
40%
28%
20%
12%
0%
6b. What echelon should be the most
effective in conducting joint
operations?
BN BDE
0%
0%
24%
4%
SQD PLT
CO
BN BDE
Takeaway:
33
33. MWFC #3
“Conducting maneuver and integrate all arms and joint capabilities to seize and retain
the initiative and defeat capable, determined enemy organizations in all types of terrain
including dense urban areas (includes offense and defense). ”
7a. What echelon is currently the most
effective in conducting multinational operations?
60%
60%
40%
28%
20%
0%
-20%
0%
SQD PLT
CO
60%
48%
40%
24%
20%
12%
0%
7b. What echelon should be the most
effective in conducting multinational operations?
BN BDE
0%
0%
20%
8%
SQD PLT
CO
BN BDE
Takeaway:
34
34. MWFC #4
“Conducting security operations across wide areas to secure the force, critical
infrastructure, or critical activities (e.g. development of indigenous security forces or
establishment of legitimate governance/rule of law).”
8a. What echelon is currently the most
effective in conducting area
reconnaissance to obtain detailed
information on enemy activity within
a prescribed area to support brigade
operations.
60%
60%
54%
40%
20%
8b. What echelon should be the most
effective in conducting area
reconnaissance to obtain detailed
information on enemy activity within
a prescribed area to support brigade
operations.
38%
40%
21%
8%
8%
8%
0%
20%
8%
8%
4%
0%
SQD PLT
CO
BN BDE
SQD PLT
42%
CO
BN BDE
Takeaway:
35
35. MWFC #5
“Retaining freedom of movement and action at the end of extended and contested lines of
operation during high tempo, decentralized operations.”
9a. What echelon is currently the most
effective in maintaining situational
awareness when moving tactically
to support brigade operations?
60%
20%
60%
55%
40%
20%
14%
5%
0%
0%
CO
50%
40%
27%
SQD PLT
9b. What echelon should be the most
effective in maintaining situational
awareness when moving tactically
to support brigade operations?
BN BDE
14%
18%
14%
5%
0%
SQD PLT
CO
BN BDE
Takeaway:
36
36. MWFC #5
“Retaining freedom of movement and action at the end of extended and contested lines of
operation during high tempo, decentralized operations.”
10a. What echelon is currently the
most effective in maintaining
freedom of movement during high
tempo brigade operations?
60%
18%
0%
5%
SQD PLT
BN BDE
32%
20%
0%
CO
41%
40%
27%
20%
0%
60%
50%
40%
10b. What echelon should be the most
effective in maintaining freedom of
movement during high tempo
brigade operations?
14%
14%
0%
SQD PLT
CO
BN BDE
Takeaway:
37
37. MWFC #5
“Retaining freedom of movement and action at the end of extended and contested lines of
operation during high tempo, decentralized operations.”
11a. What echelon is currently the
most effective in conducting route
reconnaissance to determine
conditions that may affect friendly
movement?
60%
60%
40%
32%
32%
20%
0%
-20%
11b. What echelon should be the most
effective in conducting route
reconnaissance to determine
conditions that may affect friendly
movement?
SQD PLT
40%
28%
9%
0%
CO
41%
BN BDE
20%
27%
18%
9%
5%
0%
SQD PLT
CO
BN BDE
Takeaway:
38
38. MWFC #5
“Retaining freedom of movement and action at the end of extended and contested lines of
operation during high tempo, decentralized operations.”
12a. What echelon is currently the
most effective in conducting
sustainment operations after 72
hours of offensive operation in an
austere environment?
59%
60%
40%
0%
-20%
60%
27%
20%
14%
0%
CO
50%
40%
27%
20%
0%
SQD PLT
12b. What echelon should be the most
effective in conducting sustainment
operations after 72 hours of
offensive operation in an austere
environment?
BN BDE
0%
0%
23%
0%
SQD PLT
CO
BN BDE
Takeaway:
39
39. MWFC #11
“Developing resilient and adaptive Soldiers and units to operate effectively in environments
of complexity and persistent danger.”
13a. What echelon is currently the
most effective in leaders operating
using Mission Orders?
60%
9%
9%
0%
SQD PLT
BN BDE
27%
18%
20%
0%
CO
45%
40%
27%
20%
0%
60%
55%
40%
13b. What echelon should be the most
effective in leaders operating using
Mission Orders?
9%
0%
SQD PLT
CO
BN BDE
Takeaway:
40
41. Leader Challenge
Leader Challenge
• Future add to IBOLC POI
• MCCC/NCOA
• Facilitate BOLC groups
• New vignette recruitment
• MCoE started In-house production
42. ASLTE
(Adaptive Soldier/Leader Training and Education)
Sniper Course:
• ASAT tenets during Wk 1, reinforced throughout course
– Keep in Memory exercise
– Target Detection
– Culmination exercise
– FTX’s
• Use Instructor experiences to enhance relevancy
• Fieldcraft Culmination Evaluation
– Field Skills (Target detection, Range estimation, Stalking)
– Observe/Report Procedures
– Critical thinking skills
• Mission Planning/FTX
– 48 hr FTX with 360° learning and evaluation
– IBOLC students assist planning
– USASS cadre evaluate Sniper Tactics
– ASAT cadre evaluate critical thinking skills