O slideshow foi denunciado.
Seu SlideShare está sendo baixado. ×

Mikhailov duct piers_2017_for_linked_id

Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Próximos SlideShares
Mikhailov duct PIERS 2017
Mikhailov duct PIERS 2017
Carregando em…3
×

Confira estes a seguir

1 de 27 Anúncio

Mais Conteúdo rRelacionado

Diapositivos para si (20)

Semelhante a Mikhailov duct piers_2017_for_linked_id (20)

Anúncio

Mais recentes (20)

Mikhailov duct piers_2017_for_linked_id

  1. 1. Department of Radio Engineering Devices and Antenna Systems of National Research University “Moscow Power Engineering Institute” valerypermyakov@yandex.ru Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Professor Valery A. Permyakov Ph. D. Mikhail S. Mikhailov Ph. D. Mikhail V. Isakov and Postgraduate Andrew M. Makhalov St. Petersburg — 2017 PIERS Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium
  2. 2. ABSTRACT The method of parabolic equation is used to calculate the radar range in the presence of the evaporation duct Excitation of the evaporation duct at variations in the refractive index of the troposphere is analyzed
  3. 3. The First Documentation The first person to record the phenomenon of super refraction of electromagnetic waves was Gerrit de Veer, a member of Willem Barentsz's expedition into the North Polar Region in 1596–1597. Trapped by the ice, the party was forced to endure the polar night on the archipelago of Novaya Zemlya. On January 24, 1597, De Veer claimed to have seen the Sun appear above the horizon, two full weeks prior to its calculated return.
  4. 4. Optical illusion “Flying Dutchman” The same is connected with anomalous refraction
  5. 5. Anomalous refraction in the inversion layer Humidity inversion Evaporation duct Temperature inversion Near-surface duct 15m: 100m:
  6. 6. Paulus–Jeshke model: where x is altitude (height above ocean), hw is evaporation duct height, and x0 is an aerodynamic parameter equal to 1.5∙10-4 m, and M(0) = (n-1)∙106 is the modified refractive index at the sea level Paulus, R.A. Practical application of an evaporation duct model / R.A. Paulus // Radio Science. 1985. V. 20. № 4. – pp. 887–896 Jeske, H., Die Ausbreitung elektromagnetischer Wellen im cm-bis m-Band fiber dem Meer unter besonderer Berficksichtigung der meteorologischen Bedingungen in der maritimen Grenzschicht, in Hamburger Geophysikalische Einzelschriften, De Gruyter, Hamburg, 1965. ( ) ( ) 0 0 0 0,13 ln ,w x x M x M x h x  + = + × − ×   
  7. 7. Paulus–Jeshke model: (0) 315M = 15wh m= M profile− ,x m modified refractive index
  8. 8. The radar range is limited by: • the loss in the clean air • the loss in the hydrometeors • the scattering of electromagnetic waves by sea waves • the scattering of electromagnetic waves by the turbulent troposphere • the perturbations of the evaporation duct refractive index in both vertical and horizontal directions
  9. 9. Loss in the clean air, hydrometeors and by seawaves range, km range, km range, kmrange, km -Lossless; -Loss in the clear air; -and hydrometeors 15 5 a t h m h m = =
  10. 10. Calculations were performed for the following parameters: • the length of the electromagnetic wave is 3 cm • the mean power of the signal Pm = 15 W • the antenna gain is 30 dB • the antenna radiation pattern is described by the function sin(x)/x • the width of the main lobe is 5° in both planes and is directed toward the horizon • The target's effective scattering area is 10 m2 • heights of the antenna and the target are 5–7 m
  11. 11. Reasons of this study: • at tropic latitudes evaporation ducts arrive with a probability of 100% • profile reconstructed from the measured meteorological parameters agrees with the theoretical Paulus–Jeshke profile • But! There are no the results of measurements of the refractive index profile at the seaside Kenneth D.A. The RED Experiment. An Assessment of boundary Layer Effects in a Trade Winds Regime on Microwave and Infrared over the Sea. // Bulletin of American Meteorological Society, Sept.2004.–pp.1355–1365
  12. 12. Reasons of this study: • at middle latitudes the probability of the existence of the evaporation ducts is high in the middle of the day in summer months • variations in the profile at the seaside are substantially different from the P–J profile and have higher variability in time • variations in the evaporation ducts height with distance from and along the seaside Frederickson P. Improving the Characterization of the Environment for AREPS Electromagnetic Performance Predictions / Weather Impacts Decision Aids (WIDA) Workshop. 15 March 2012, Reno, NV
  13. 13. For example: (0) 347,5M = 3wh m= M profile− ,x m modified refractive index
  14. 14. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] 3 2 77,6 373 10 , P e M T T P e mb T K = + × = = =
  15. 15. Parameters of numerical simulation • the standard scalar parabolic equation was used. • initial condition set at a distance of 100 m • zero boundary condition was set at the sea level • the range increment is 1–10 m • the height increment is 0.05 m • the maximum height is ~200 m • the absorbing layer was introduces in an interval of heights of 160–200 m
  16. 16. Perturbations of the vertical profile • Let us consider perturbation of the evaporation duct by a segment of the normal troposphere with positive gradient of the refractive index situated directly above the sea surface
  17. 17. Perturbations of the vertical profile thickness of the NT layer
  18. 18. seaside 150km 20wh m= 5wh m= Vertical and horizontal variations
  19. 19. Vertical and horizontal variations Antenna’s heights is 7m 1st mode 2nd mode 3rd mode
  20. 20. Vertical and horizontal variations Antenna’s heights is 20m 1st mode 2nd mode 3rd mode
  21. 21. seaside150km 20wh m= 5wh m= Vertical and horizontal variations
  22. 22. Vertical and horizontal variations Antenna’s heights is 7m 1st mode 2nd mode
  23. 23. Transition region Normal troposphere Transition region Evaporation duct z, kmz1 z2seaside ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 , 0 , , M x z M x at z z M x z z M x z z M x z at z z z z z M x z M x at z z = < <  × − + × − = < < −  = >
  24. 24. Transition region 1 0z = 2 3z km= 2 30z km= 2 40z km= on condition
  25. 25. CONCLUSION • The effect of variations in the refractive index in the transition region from the seaside to the beginning of the regular evaporation duct has been shown • Perturbations of the duct parameters at the horizon boundary and beyond have the effect of radar range • The obtained results to be important for experiment on observation of radio waves propagation above the sea • In future, for operation of a radar station, it is expedient to supplement the radar complex with a facility for measuring the M profile at the radio horizon with the‒ help of sensors installed on buoys, ships, or pilotless vehicles and a computer program for calculation of radio link by the method of parabolic equation
  26. 26. Thank you for attention! This work was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (project no. 8.3244.2017/PCh) ACKNOWLEDGMENT

×