SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 90
Baixar para ler offline
Dr. Rakhesh Singh Kshetrimayum
6. Plane waves reflection from media
interface
Dr. Rakhesh Singh Kshetrimayum
3/25/20141 Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum
6.1 Introduction
Plane waves reflection
from a media interface
Normal
incidence
TE
Oblique
incidencePerfect
conductor
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum2
TE
Lossless medium
Good
conductor
Fig. 6.1 Plane waves reflection from media interface
Lossy conducting
medium
TM
Brewster angle
Total internal reflection
Effect on
polarization
6.1 Introduction
Till now, we have studied plane waves in various medium
Let us try to explore how plane waves will behave at a media
interface
In practical scenarios of wireless and mobile
communications,
radio wave will reflect from
walls &
other obstacles on its path
When a radio wave reflects from a surface,
the strength of the reflected waves is less than that of the
incident wave
3/25/20143 Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum
6.1 Introduction
The ratio of the two (reflected wave/incident wave) is
known as the‘reflection coefficient’ of the surface
This ratio depends on the
conductivity (σ),
permittivity (ε) and
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum4
permittivity (ε) and
permeability (µ)
of the material that forms the reflective surface
as well as material properties of the
air
from which the radio wave is incident
6.1 Introduction
Some part of the wave will be transmitted through the
material
How much of the incident wave has been transmitted
through the material is
also dependent on the material parameters mentioned above
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum5
also dependent on the material parameters mentioned above
It is given by another ratio known as‘transmission
coefficient’
It is the ratio of the transmitted wave divided by the incident
wave
6.1 Introduction
In plane wave reflection from media interface,
what we will be doing is
basically writing down the
electric and
magnetic field expressions
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum6
magnetic field expressions
in all the regions of interest and
apply the boundary conditions
to get the values of the
transmission and
reflection coefficients
6.1 Introduction
One of the possible applications of such an exercise is in
wireless communication,
where we have to find the
transmission and
reflection coefficients of
multipaths
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum7
multipaths
Electromagnetic waves are often
reflected or
scattered or
diffracted
at one or more obstacles before arriving at the receiver
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
For smooth surfaces,
EM waves are reflected;
For rough surfaces,
EM waves are scattered;
For edges of surfaces,
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum8
For edges of surfaces,
EM waves are diffracted
Fig. 6.2 depicts multipath for a mobile receiver in the car from
direct,
reflected and
diffracted waves
of the signal sent from the base station
6.1 Introduction
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum9
Fig. 6.2 Illustration of reflected and diffracted wave in mobile
communications (this chapter’s study will be very helpful in
understanding wireless and mobile communications)
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
We will consider the case of normal incidence,
when the incident wave propagation vector is along the normal
to the interface between two media
6.2.1 Lossy conducting medium
We will assume plane waves with electric field vector
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum10
We will assume plane waves with electric field vector
oriented along the x-axis and
propagating along the positive z-axis without loss of
generality
For z<0 (we will refer this region as region I and it is
assumed to be a lossy medium)
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Let us do a more generalized analysis by assuming this region
I as a lossy medium
It could be a lossless medium like free space
The incident electric and magnetic fields can be expressed as
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum11
1
ˆ z
i oE xE e γ−
=
r
1
1
1
ˆ z
i oH y E e γ
η
−
=
r
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
where η1 is the medium 1 wave impedance and
Eo is the arbitrary amplitude of the incident electric field
The expression for intrinsic wave impedance and propagation
constant
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum12
( )
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 11 1 1
; 1
j j j j
j j
jj j
ωµ ωµ ωµ σ
η γ α β ω µ ε
γ ωε σ ωεωµ ωε σ
= = = = + = −
++
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
iE
r
E
r
2
t
γ
r
1
i
γ
r
iH
r
tE
r
tH
r
iE
r
r
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum13
2 2 2, ,ε µ σ
rE
r
1 1 1, ,ε µ σ
1
r
γ
r
rH
r
rE
r
Fig. 6.3A plane EM wave is incident from region I or medium 1 for z<0
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Convention:
a circle with a dot in the center an arrow pointing
perpendicularly out of the page and
a circle with a cross an arrow pointing perpendicularly into
the page)
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum14
the page)
Notation for fields:
subscript i incident, r reflected and t transmitted
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Note that the incident wave from region I will be partially
reflected and transmitted at the media interface between two
regions
For reflected wave, z<0, wave direction is in the –z axis and
the reflected electric field is expressed as
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum15
the reflected electric field is expressed as
where the Γ is the reflection coefficient
1
ˆ z
r oE x E e γ+
= Γ
r
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
The reflection coefficient is defined as the ratio of amplitude
of the reflected electric field divided by amplitude of the
incident electric field as follows:
r
i
E
E
Γ =
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum16
The reflected magnetic field can be obtained from the
reflected electric field using the Maxwell’s curl equations as
iE
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
1
1
1 1 1
ˆ ˆ ˆ
0 0
r r
r r
r
z
o
E j H
x y z
E j E j
H
j x y z
E e γ
ωµ
ωµ ωµ ωµ
+
∇× = −
∇× ∇× ∂ ∂ ∂
⇒ = − = =
∂ ∂ ∂
Γ
r r
r r
r
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum17
( ) ( ) ( )1 1 11
1
1 1 1
0 0
ˆ ˆ ˆ
o
z z z
o o o
E e
j j
y E e y E e y E e
z j
γ γ γγ
γ
ωµ ωµ ωµ
+ + +
Γ
∂ 
= Γ = Γ = − Γ 
∂ 
1
1
ˆ z
r oH y E e γ
η
+Γ
∴ = −
r
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Therefore, the Poynting vector for reflected wave of region I
is
shows power is traveling in the -z axis for the reflected wave
2 2* 2
*
1
ˆz
r r r o
z
S E H E e α
η
+
= × == − Γ
r r r
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum18
shows power is traveling in the -z axis for the reflected wave
For transmitted wave, z>0, wave is propagating in lossy
medium 2 (we will refer this region as region II),
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
where η is the wave impedance of lossy medium 2 and τ is
z
ot eExE 2ˆ γτ −
=
r
zo
t e
E
yH 2
2
ˆ γ
η
τ −
=
r
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum19
where η2 is the wave impedance of lossy medium 2 and τ is
the transmission coefficient
intrinsic wave impedance and propagation constant are
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
transmission coefficient is defined as the ratio of amplitude of
the transmitted electric field divided by amplitude of the
( )
2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 22 2 2
; 1
j j j j
j j
jj j
ωµ ωµ ωµ σ
η γ α β ω µ ε
γ ωε σ ωεωµ ωε σ
= = = = + = −
++
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum20
the transmitted electric field divided by amplitude of the
incident electric field as follows:
t
i
E
E
τ =
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Our intention here is to find the transmission and reflection
coefficients
Let us rewrite the fields in the two regions: region I (z<0)
and region II (z>0) (seeTable 6.1) and
Apply the boundary conditions to obtain the two unknown
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum21
Apply the boundary conditions to obtain the two unknown
coefficients
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Region I (lossy medium 1) Region II (lossy medium 2)
Table 6.1 Fields in the two lossy regions (normal incidence)
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum22
1
ˆ z
i oE xE e γ−
=
r
1
1
1
ˆ z
i oH y E e γ
η
−
=
r
1
ˆ z
r oE x E e γ+
= Γ
r
1
1
ˆ z
r oH y E e γ
η
+Γ
= −
r
z
ot eExE 2ˆ γτ −
=
r zo
t e
E
yH 2
2
ˆ γ
η
τ −
=
r
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
This is basically boundary value problem with boundary
conditions at z=0
Note that total electric and magnetic fields (both incident
and reflected) are tangential to the interface at z=0
Similarly, the transmitted electric and magnetic field are also
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum23
Similarly, the transmitted electric and magnetic field are also
tangential to the interface at z=0
Also note that there are no surface current density at the
interface
Hence, the tangential components of electric and magnetic
fields must be continuous at the interface z=0
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Therefore,
( ) 0 00
1 1i r t z
E E E E Eτ τ
=
+ = ⇒ + Γ = ⇒ + Γ =
r r r
0 0
0
1 2 1 2
1 1
i r t
z
H H H E E
τ τ
η η η η=
   − Γ − Γ
+ = ⇒ = ⇒ =   
   
r r r
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum24
Therefore,
Hence,
( ) ( ) 2 1
2 1
1 2 1 2 2 1
1 1 1
1 1
η ητ
η η
η η η η η η
−− Γ − Γ + Γ
= ⇒ = ⇒ − Γ = + Γ ⇒ Γ =
+
2 1 2
2 1 1 2
2
1 1
η η η
τ
η η η η
−
= + Γ = + =
+ +
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
6.2.2 Lossless medium
If the regions are lossless dielectric,
then, σ = 0 and µ and ε are real quantities
The propagation constant for this case is purely imaginary
and can be written as
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum25
and can be written as
γ = jβ =jω√(µε)
The wave impedance of the dielectric is
η= = = = =jωµ
γ
j
j
ωµ
β
ωµ
ω µε
µ
ε r
r
ε
µ
η0
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
For a lossless medium,
η is real, so,
both Γ and τ are real
Electric and magnetic fields are in phase with each other
The wavelength in the dielectric is
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum26
The wavelength in the dielectric is
= =
And the phase velocity is
= = =
where c is the speed of light in free space
λ 2π
β
2π
ω µε
pv ω
β µε
1
rr
c
εµ
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Table 6.2 Fields in the two lossless regions (normal incidence)
Region I (lossless medium 1) Region II (lossless medium 2)
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum27
1
ˆ j z
i oE xE e β−
=
r 1
1
1
ˆ j z
i oH y E e β
η
−
=
r
1
ˆ j z
r oE x E e β+
= Γ
r 1
1
ˆ j z
r oH y E e β
η
+Γ
= −
r
2
ˆ j z
t oE x E e β
τ −
=
r
2
2
ˆ j zo
t
E
H y e β
τ
η
−
=
r
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Applying the boundary conditions like before,
we can get the expression for
reflection and
transmission coefficients,
we will get the same expression as before
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum28
we will get the same expression as before
2 1
2 1
;
η η
η η
−
Γ =
+
2
1 2
2η
τ
η η
=
+
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Poynting vector in region I
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )1 1 1 1
* *
* *
1 1 1 0 0
0 0
1 1
ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆj z j z j z j z
tot tot i r i r
E E
S E H E E H H E e x E e x e y e yβ β β β
η η
− + − 
= × = + × + = + Γ × −Γ 
 
r r r r r r r
2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2j z j zβ β− +   Γ Γ Γ Γ
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum29
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
1 1
1 1
2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22
1 1 1 1 1 1
2 2
0 02
1
1 1
ˆ ˆ1
ˆ1 2 sin 2
j z j z
j z j z
E E e E e E E E
z e e z
E E
j z z
β β
β β
η η η η η η
β
η η
− +
+ −
   Γ Γ Γ Γ   
= − + − = − Γ + −   
      
 Γ 
= − Γ − 
  
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Poynting vector in region II
( )2 2
* 22
02 * 0
0
2 2
ˆ ˆ ˆj z j z
t t
EE
S E H x E e e y zβ β ττ
τ
η η
− − 
= × = × = 
 
r r r
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum30
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
2 2
2 12 2 1 2
2 2 2
12 1 2 1 2 1
4 41
1 1
η η η η η
ηη η η η η η
− −Γ
− Γ = − = ⇒ =
+ + +
Q
( )
( ) 222 2 2
02 22 2
2
2 1 1 2 12 1
12 4 1
ˆ
E
S z
η η τ
τ τ
η η η η ηη η
− Γ− Γ
= ⇒ = ⇒ = ∴ =
+ +
r
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Power conservation
Compare the time average power flow in the two regions
For z <0, the time average power flow through 1m2 cross
section is
( )
2
1 1 1− Γr
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum31
And for z >0, the time average power flow through 1m2
cross section is
( )
2
21 1
0
1
1 1 1
ˆRe
2 2
avgS S z E
η
− Γ
= • =
r
( )
2
22 2
0
1
1 1 1
ˆRe
2 2
avgS S z E
η
− Γ
= • =
r
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Hence,
So real power is conserved
6.2.3 Good conductor:
If the region II (z >0) is a good (but not perfect) conductor
1 2
avg avgS S=
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum32
If the region II (z >0) is a good (but not perfect) conductor
and
region I is a lossless medium like free space,
the propagation constant for medium 2 is
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
where δ is the skin depth for the medium 2,
which is a good conductor
Similarly, the intrinsic impedance of the conducting medium
( ) ( )2 2
2 2 2 2
1
1 1
2 s
j j j
ωµ σ
γ α β
δ
= + = + = +
2
s
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum33
Similarly, the intrinsic impedance of the conducting medium
2 (see also example 6.2) simplifies to
( )
( )
( )( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
2
22 2 2
2
2 22
2 2 2 2
2
2 2
1 1
(1 )
2
1 1 12 2 2
1
1 1 2 21
j j j j
j j
j
j j j j
j
j j j
ωµωµ ωµ ωµ
η
γ ωµ σ σωµ σ
ωµ ωµ ωµ ωµ
σ σ σ σ
= = = =
+ +
+
− + +
= = = = +
+ − −
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Now, the wave impedance of medium 2 is complex, with a
phase angle of 45o so the electric
and magnetic field will be 45o out of phase and Γ and τ will
be complex.
Now, let us write down the field expressions in region I and
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum34
Now, let us write down the field expressions in region I and
II for lossless dielectric (region I) and good conductor
(region II) interface
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Table 6.4 Fields in the two regions (normal incidence)
Region I (lossless medium) Region II (good conductor)
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum35
1
ˆ j z
i oE xE e β−
=
r 1
1
1
ˆ j z
i oH y E e β
η
−
=
r
1
ˆ j z
r oE x E e β+
= Γ
r
1
1
ˆ j z
r oH y E e β
η
+Γ
= −
r
2
ˆ z
t oE x E e γ
τ −
=
r
2
2
ˆ zo
t
E
H y e γ
τ
η
−
=
r
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Applying the boundary conditions like before,
we can get the expression for
reflection and
transmission coefficients,
we will get the same expression as before
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum36
we will get the same expression as before
2 1
2 1
;
η η
η η
−
Γ =
+
2
1 2
2η
τ
η η
=
+
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Note that we have to use the previous expressions for
intrinsic wave impedances for lossless medium and good
conductor
1 ;
µ
η
ε
= ( ) 2
2 1
2
j
ωµ
η
σ
= +
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum37
Power conservation
let us find out the Poynting vector in the two regions
Noting that the field in region I comprise of incident and
reflected wave,
we can write the Poynting vector for z <0
ε ( )2
2
1
2
jη
σ
= +
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
For z >0, only transmitted fields exist and we can write
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( )
1 1 1 1
1 1
* *
* *
1 1 1 *0 0
0 0
1 1
2
20 2 2*
1
ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ
ˆ1
j z j z j z j z
tot tot i r i r
j z j z
E E
S E H E E H H E e x E e x e y e y
E
e e z
β β β β
β β
η η
η
− + −
− +
 
= × = + × + = + Γ × − Γ 
 
= − Γ + Γ − Γ
r r r r r r r
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum38
For z >0, only transmitted fields exist and we can write
down the Poynting vector as
( )
*
2 2* *
02 * 20
0 * *
2 2
ˆ ˆ ˆz z z
t t
EE
S E H x E e e y z eγ γ αττ
τ
η η
− − − 
= × = × = 
 
r r r
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
At z=0,
( )
2
201 *
1
ˆ1
E
S z
η
= − Γ + Γ − Γ
r
( )
( )
2 2 2 2
20 0 2 02 *4
ˆ ˆ ˆ1
E E E
S z z z
τ η
= = = − Γ + Γ − Γ
r
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum39
Complex power is conserved
Then the time average power flow through a 1m2 cross
section can be calculated as follows
Since
( )
( )2*
2 11 2
ˆ ˆ ˆ1S z z z
η ηη η
= = = − Γ + Γ − Γ
+
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
is purely an imaginary number, therefore,
1 12 2* j z j z
e eβ β− +
−Γ + Γ
( )
2
21 1
0
11 1
ˆRe
2 2
avgS S z E
η
− Γ
= • =
r
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum40
which shows power balance at z=0 only
( ) 0
1
ˆRe
2 2
avgS S z E
η
= • =
( ) z
avg eEzSS α
η
2
2
2
2
0
22 1
2
1
ˆRe
2
1 −Γ−
=•=
r
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Note that the Poynting vector for z>0,
this power density in the lossy conductor decays
exponentially according to the attenuation factor
6.2.4 Perfect conductor:
Now assume that the region II (z >0) contains a perfect
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum41
Now assume that the region II (z >0) contains a perfect
conductor and region I is a lossless medium
Let us rewrite the expressions for propagation constant and
wave impedance of a good conductor and deduce the
expressions for perfect conductor
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Perfect conductor implies σ →∝, and
( ) ( )2 2
2 2 2 2
1
1 1
2 s
j j j
ωµ σ
γ α β
δ
= + = + = +
( ) 2
2
2
1
2
j
ωµ
η
σ
= +
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum42
Perfect conductor implies σ2→∝, and
correspondingly, α2→∝, δs
2→0, η2→0
Note that
Therefore, τ→0 and Γ→-1
2 2 1
1 2 2 1
2
,
η η η
τ
η η η η
−
= Γ =
+ +
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Table 6.5 Fields in the two regions (normal incidence)
Region I (lossless medium) Region II (perfect conductor)
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum43
1
ˆ j z
i oE xE e β−
=
r
1
1
1
ˆ j z
i oH y E e β
η
−
=
r
1
ˆ j z
r oE x E e β+
= Γ
r 1
1
ˆ j z
r oH y E e β
η
+Γ
= −
r
0tE ≅
r
0tH ≅
r
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
The field for z >0 thus decay infinitely fast and
are identically zero in the perfect conductor as we have seen
in example 6.2 as well
The perfect conductor can be thought of as‘shorting out’ the
incident electric field
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum44
incident electric field
Now let us write down the field expressions in region I and II
for lossless dielectric and perfect conductor interface (see
Table 6.5)
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Power conservation
In order to see the power conservation,
let us find out the Poynting vector in the two regions
Noting that the field in region I comprise of
incident and
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum45
incident and
reflected wave,
we can write the Poynting vector for z <0 (Γ=-1)
( )1 11
0 0 1
ˆ ˆ2 sinj z j z
tot i rE E E xE e e x jE zβ β
β−
= + = − = −
r r r
6.2 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at normal incidence
Therefore, the Poynting vector for z<0 is
( )1 11 0 0
1
1 1
ˆ ˆ2 cosj z j z
tot i r
E E
H H H y e e y zβ β
β
η η
−
= + = + =
r r
( )
2
4 Er r
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum46
which has a zero real part and
thus indicates that no real power is delivered to the perfect conductor
Fields in region II is anyway zero and hence power is also zero
( )
2
* 01 1 1
1 1
1
4
ˆ sin costot tot
E
S E H zj z zβ β
η
= × = −
r r
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
We will consider the problem of a plane wave
obliquely incident on a plane interface
between two lossy conducting regions
We will first consider two particular cases of this problem as
follows:
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum47
follows:
the electric field is in the xz plane (parallel polarization)
the electric field is in normal to the xz plane (perpendicular
polarization)
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
Any arbitrary incident plane wave can be expressed
as a linear combination of these two principal polarizations
The plane of incidence is that plane containing
the normal vector to the interface and
the direction of propagation vector of the incident wave
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum48
the direction of propagation vector of the incident wave
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
For Fig. 6.4, this is the xz plane
For perpendicular polarization (TE),
electric field is perpendicular to the plane of incidence
For parallel polarization (TM),
electric field is parallel to the plane of incidence
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum49
electric field is parallel to the plane of incidence
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
tt HE
rr
,
z
x
rr HE
rr
,
rθ tθ
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum50
Fig. 6.5 Oblique incidence of plane EM wave at a media interface
1 1 1
, ,ε µ σ 2 2 2, ,ε µ σ
z
Region II
ii HE
rr
,
Region I
iθ
rθ tθ
nˆ
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
6.3.1 Perpendicular polarization (TE):
In this case, electric field vector is perpendicular to the xz
plane,
Hence, it will have component along the y-axis
Since the electric field is transversal to the plane of incidence
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum51
Since the electric field is transversal to the plane of incidence
They are also known transverse electric (TE) waves
iθ rθnˆ nˆ zˆ
xˆxˆ
zˆ
iθγ cos1
iθγ sin1
rθγ cos1
rθγ sin11
i
γ
r 1
r
γ
r
xˆ
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum52
tθnˆ zˆ
2 cos tγ θ
2 sin tγ θ 2
t
γ
r
Fig. 6.6Wave propagation vector for (a) incident (b) reflected and (c) transmitted
EM waves at oblique incidence
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
Let us assume that the incident wave propagates in the first
quadrant of xz plane without loss of generality and
(incident propagation vector) makes an angle θi with
the normal (see Fig. 6.6 (a))
1
i
γ
r
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum53
( ) ( ) ( )'
1 1 1 1 1 1
ˆ ˆˆ ˆcos sin cos sin cos sini
i i i i i iz z x zz xx z x z xγ γ θ γ θ γ θ γ θ γ θ θ• = + • + = + = +
r r
( )1 cos sin
0
ˆi iz x
iE E e y
γ θ θ− +
=
r
1
1
i
i i i
E
E j H H
j
ωµ
ωµ
∇×
∇× = − ⇒ =
−
r
r r r
Q
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
1 1
1
1 1
cos sin cos sin
0
1 1
cos sin
0
cos sin cos sin
0
ˆ ˆ ˆ
1
ˆ ˆ
0 0
ˆ ˆ
i i i i
i i
i i i i
z x z x
z x
z x z x
x y z
E e e
x z
j x y z j z x
E e
E e e
x z
γ θ θ γ θ θ
γ θ θ
γ θ θ γ θ θ
ωµ ωµ
− + − +
− +
− + − +
    ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ 
= = − +       − ∂ ∂ ∂ − ∂ ∂     
    ∂ ∂ 
= −       
( )
{ }1 cos sin0 1
ˆ ˆcos sini iz xE
e x z
γ θ θγ
θ θ− +
= − +
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum54
0
1
ˆ ˆ
E e e
x z
j z xωµ
∂ ∂ 
= −       ∂ ∂    
( )
{ }
( )
( )
1
1
cos sin0 1
1
cos sin0
1
ˆ ˆcos sin
ˆ ˆcos sin
i i
i i
z x
i i
z x
i i
E
e x z
j
E
e x z
γ θ θ
γ θ θ
γ
θ θ
ωµ
θ θ
η
− +
− +
= − +

= − +
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
Let us assume that the reflected wave propagates in the
second quadrant of xz plane and
(reflected propagation vector) makes an angle θr with
the normal (see Fig. 6.6 (b))
1
r
γ
r
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum55
( ) ( ) ( )1 1 1 1 1 1
ˆ ˆˆ ˆ' cos sin cos sin cos sinr
r r r r r rz z x zz xx z x z xγ γ θ γ θ γ θ γ θ γ θ θ• = − + • + = − + = − +
r r
( )1 cos sin
0
ˆr rz x
r TEE E e y
γ θ θ− − +
= Γ
r
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
Note that and will have the same magnitude
since both the waves are still in the same region I,
only their direction changes
Since the Poynting vector must be negative like the previous
case of normal incidence,
1
r
γ
r
1
i
γ
r
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum56
case of normal incidence,
You could also use the Maxwell’s curl equation below to find
this
( )
( )1 cos sin0
1
ˆ ˆcos sinr rz x
r TE r r
E
H e x z
γ θ θ
θ θ
η
− − +
= Γ +
r
1ωµj
E
H r
r
−
×∇
=
r
r
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
The transmitted fields will have similar expression with the
incident fields except
that now the θi should be replaced by θt (angle that transmitted
propagation vector makes with the normal),
γ1 should be replaced by γ2 (wave is in region II now) and
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum57
γ1 should be replaced by γ2 (wave is in region II now) and
multiplication by (transmission coefficient)
The transmitted fields are ( )2 cos sin
0
ˆ t tz x
t TEE yE e
γ θ θ
τ − +
=
r
( )
( )2 cos sin0
2 2
ˆ ˆcos sint tz xt TE
t t t
E E
H e x z
j
γ θ θτ
θ θ
ωµ η
− +∇×
= = − +
−
r
r
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
Table 6.5 Fields in two regions (oblique incidence:
perpendicular polarization)
Region I (lossy medium 1) Region II (lossy medium 2)
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum58
( )1 cos sin
0
ˆi iz x
iE E e y
γ θ θ− +
=
r
( )
( )1 cos sin0
1
ˆ ˆcos sini iz x
i i i
E
H e x z
γ θ θ
θ θ
η
− +
= − +
r
( )1 cos sin
0
ˆr rz x
r TEE E e y
γ θ θ− − +
= Γ
r
( )
( )1 cos sin0
1
ˆ ˆcos sini iz xTE
r r r
E
H e x z
γ θ θ
θ θ
η
− +Γ
= +
r
( )2 cos sin
0
ˆ t tz x
t TEE yE e
γ θ θ
τ − +
=
r
( )
( )2 cos sin0
2
ˆ ˆcos sint tz xTE
t t t
E
H e x z
γ θ θτ
θ θ
η
− +
= − +
r
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
Equating the tangential components of electric field
(electric field has only Ey component and it is tangential at the
interface z=0) and
magnetic field
(magnetic field has two components: Hx and Hz and only Hx is
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum59
(magnetic field has two components: Hx and Hz and only Hx is
tangential at the interface z=0)
at z=0 gives 1 21sin sinsini trx xx
TE TEe e eγ θ γ θγ θ
τ− −−
+ Γ =
1 21sin sinsin
1 1 2
1
cos cos cosi trx xxTE TE
i r te e eγ θ γ θγ θ τ
θ θ θ
η η η
− −−Γ−
+ = −
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
If Ex and Hy are to be continuous at the interface z = 0 for all
x,
then, this x variation must be the same on both sides of the
equations (also known as phase matching condition)
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum60
tri θγθγθγ sinsinsin 211 ==
1 2; sin sini r i tθ θ γ θ γ θ⇒ = =
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
The first is Snell’s law of reflection
which states that the angle of incidence equals the angle of
reflection
The second result is the Snell’s law of refraction
(refraction is the change in direction of a wave due to change in
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum61
(refraction is the change in direction of a wave due to change in
velocity from one medium to another medium)
Also note that refractive index of a medium is defined as
0 0
0 0
r r
r r
p
c
n
v
µ ε µ ε
µ ε
µ ε
= = =
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
hence, for a lossless dielectric media,
Now we can simplify above two equations by applying Snell’s
2 2 22 2 1 2
1 1 2 11 1 1
sin
sin
i
t
v n
v n
µ ε εθ γ β
θ γ β µ ε ε
= = = = = =
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum62
Now we can simplify above two equations by applying Snell’s
two laws as follows
1 TE TEτ+Γ =
1 1 2
cos cos
cosi r TE
TE t
θ θ τ
θ
η η η
− + Γ = −
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
The above two equations has two unknowns τTE and ГTE and
it can be solved easily as follows
Therefore,
2
1 1
cos cos
cos
i r
TE TE
t
θ θ η
τ
η η θ
 
= −Γ 
 
1 TE TEτ+Γ =
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum63
Therefore,
22 2 2
1 1 1 1
1 2 2 1 2 1
1 1 1 2
cos coscos cos
1 1 1
cos cos cos cos
cos cos cos cos cos cos
cos cos cos cos
i ir r
TE TE TE
t t t t
t r i t i t
TE TE
t t t r
θ η θη η θ η θ
η θ η θ η θ η θ
η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ
η θ η θ η θ η θ
     
+ Γ = −Γ ⇒ Γ + = −     
     
   + − −
⇒ Γ = ⇒ Γ =   
+   
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
Hence, the reflection and transmission coefficients for
oblique incidence (Fresnel coefficients) for perpendicular
2 1 1 2 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
cos cos cos cos cos cos 2 cos
1 1
cos cos cos cos cos cos
i t t r i t i
TE TE
t r t r t r
η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ
τ
η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ
− + + −
∴ = + Γ = + = =
+ + +
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum64
oblique incidence (Fresnel coefficients) for perpendicular
polarization are given as follows:
For normal incidence, it is a particular case and put
2 1
2 1
cos cos
cos cos
i t
TE
i t
η θ η θ
η θ η θ
−
Γ =
+
2
2 1
2 cos
cos cos
i
TE
i t
η θ
τ
η θ η θ
=
+
0=== tri θθθ
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
6.3.2 Parallel Polarization (TM):
In this case, electric field vector lies in the xz plane
Since the magnetic field is transversal to the plane of
incidence such waves are also called as transverse magnetic
(TM) waves
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum65
(TM) waves
So let us start with H vector which will have only y
component,
( )ii xz
i e
E
yH θθγ
η
sincos
1
0 1ˆ +−
=
r
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
1
1
i
i
H
H j E E
j
ωε
ωε
∇×
∇× = ⇒ =
r
r r r
Q
( ) ( )1 1cos sin cos sin
ˆ ˆ ˆ
1 i i i iz x z x
x y z
E e e
γ θ θ γ θ θ− + − +    ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ 
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum66
( )
( ) ( )
( )
{ } ( )
1 1
1
1 1
cos sin cos sin
0
1 1 1
cos sin0
1
cos sin cos sin0 1
0
1 1
1
ˆ ˆ
0 0
ˆ ˆˆ ˆcos sin cos si
i i i i
i i
i i i i
z x z x
z x
z x z x
i i i
E e e
x z
j x y z j z x
E
e
E
e x z E e x z
j
γ θ θ γ θ θ
γ θ θ
γ θ θ γ θ θ
ωε ωε η
η
γ
θ θ θ
ωε η
− + − +
− +
− + − +
    ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ 
= = − +       ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂     
= − = −( )n iθ
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
Similar to the previous case of parallel polarization, we can
write the reflected magnetic field vector as
The transmitted fields will have similar expression with the
( )1 cos sin0
1
ˆ ˆ r rz xTM
r
E
H y ye
γ θ θ
η
− − +Γ
= −
r
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum67
The transmitted fields will have similar expression with the
incident fields except that
now the θi should be replaced by θt (angle that transmitted
propagation vector makes with the normal),
γ1 should be replaced by γ2 (wave is in region II) and
multiplied by a factor (transmission coefficient forTM case)
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
Table 6.6 Fields in two regions (oblique incidence: parallel
( )
( )2
cos sin
0
ˆ ˆcos sint tz x
t TM t tE E e x z
γ θ θ
τ θ θ
− +
= −
r
( )2 cos sin0
2
ˆ t tz xTM
t
E
H y e
γ θ θτ
η
− +
=
r
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum68
Table 6.6 Fields in two regions (oblique incidence: parallel
polarization) {next page}
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
Region I (lossy medium 1) Region II (lossy medium 2)
( )
( )1 cos sin
0
ˆ ˆcos sini iz x
i i iE E e x z
γ θ θ
θ θ− +
= −
r
( )Er
( )
( )2
cos sin
0
ˆ ˆcos sint tz x
t TM t tE E e x z
γ θ θ
τ θ θ
− +
= −
r
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum69
( )ii xz
i e
E
yH θθγ
η
sincos
1
0 1ˆ +−
=
r
( )
{ }1 cos sin
0
ˆ ˆcos sinr rz x
r TM r iE E e x z
γ θ θ
θ θ− − +
= Γ +
r
( )1 cos sin0
1
ˆ ˆ r rz xTM
r
E
H y ye
γ θ θ
η
− − +Γ
= −
r
( )2 cos sin0
2
ˆ t tz xTM
t
E
H y e
γ θ θτ
η
− +
=
r
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
Equating the tangential components of magnetic field
(magnetic field has only Hy component and it is tangential at the
interface z=0) and
electric field
(electric field has two components: Ex and Ez and only Ex is
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum70
(electric field has two components: Ex and Ez and only Ex is
tangential at the interface z=0)
at z=0 gives
1 21sin sinsin
cos cos cosi trx xx
i TM r TM te e eγ θ γ θγ θ
θ θ τ θ− −−
+ Γ =
21 1 sinsin sin
1 1 2
ti r xx x
TM TMe ee γ θγ θ γ θ
τ
η η η
−− −
Γ
− =
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
Therefore,
which is Snell’s law of reflection and refraction and this
tri θγθγθγ sinsinsin 211 ==
1 2; sin sini r i tθ θ γ θ γ θ⇒ = =
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum71
which is Snell’s law of reflection and refraction and this
implies that
cos cos cosi TM r TM tθ θ τ θ+ Γ =
( )
1 2
1
1 TM
TM
τ
η η
− Γ =
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
The above two equations has two unknowns τTM and ГTM and
it can be easily solved as follows
Therefore,
cos cos
cos
i TM r
TM
t
θ θ
τ
θ
+ Γ
= ( )2
1
1TM TM
η
τ
η
= − Γ
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum72
Therefore,
( ) ( )2 2
1 1
2 1 1 22 2
1 1 1 1
2 1
2
cos cos cos cos
1 1
cos cos cos
cos cos cos cos coscos
cos cos cos cos
cos cos
cos
i TM r i TM r
TM TM
t t t
i t r i tr
TM TM
t t t t
t i
TM
θ θ θη η θ
θ η η θ θ
θ η θ η θ η θ η θη θ η
η θ θ η η θ η θ
η θ η θ
η θ
+Γ Γ
= −Γ ⇒ −Γ = +
       − − −
⇒ Γ − − = − ⇒ Γ =       
       
−
⇒ Γ = 2 1
1 2 1
cos cos
cos cos cos
t i
t r t i
η θ η θ
η θ η θ η θ
−
=
+ +
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
Hence, the reflection and transmission coefficients for oblique
( ) 2 1 2 1 2 12 2 2
1 1 2 1 1 2 1
1 22
1 2 1 2 1
cos cos cos cos cos cos
1 1
cos cos cos cos
2 cos 2 cos
cos cos cos cos
t i t i t i
TM TM
t i t i
i i
t i t i
η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θη η η
τ
η η η θ η θ η η θ η θ
η θ η θη
η η θ η θ η θ η θ
   − + − +
∴ = −Γ = − =   
+ +   
 
= = 
+ + 
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum73
Hence, the reflection and transmission coefficients for oblique
incidence (Fresnel coefficients) for parallel polarization are given as
follows:
Note that cosine terms multiplication in the above equations is
different from the previous expression forTE waves
2 1
2 1
cos cos
cos cos
t i
TM
t i
η θ η θ
η θ η θ
−
∴Γ =
+
2
2 1
2 cos
cos cos
i
TM
t i
η θ
τ
η θ η θ
=
+
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
6.3.3 Brewster angle:
For Γ=0, the angle of incidence is known as Brewster angle
(θB)
This means at this angle of incidence of the EM wave from
region I,
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum74
region I,
there will be no reflection from region II,
all the EM waves will be absorbed
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
For parallel polarization,
2 1
2 1
cos cos
0
cos cos
t i
TM
t i
η θ η θ
η θ η θ
−
Γ = =
+
TM
i Bθ θ=
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum75
Also we have from 2nd Snell’s law
2 1cos cos TM
t Bη θ η θ⇒ =
t
TM
B θγθγ sinsin 21 =
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
Using the above two equations, we can get (see textbook)










−
= 22
2
2
2
1
2
1
sin
γη
η
η
θTM
B
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum76
For lossless media, we have,
1
1 1 1 1
1 1
2
2 2 22 2
2 2 2 2 1 21 1 1 2
2 2 2 2 2
2 12 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2
1 2 2 2
1
; sin TM
B
µ ε
µ γ µ µ ε µ ε µ εη γ ε µ
θ
µ ε µ εη γ µ µ ε µ ε µ γ ε µ
ε µ ε µ
−
= = = = ∴ =
−
Q








− 2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
γ
γ
η
ηB
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
For magnetic media,
is of the form 1/0 and Brewster angle does not
exist
21 εε =
TM
Bθ2
sin
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum77
exist
But, for dielectric media, it exist and can be calculated as
follows
2
1 2 2 2
2 1 2 1 1 1
1 2
1
sin tanTM TM
B B
n
n
ε
ε ε ε
θ θ
ε ε ε ε ε
ε ε
−
⇒ = = ⇒ = =
+−
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
For perpendicular polarization,
Similarly, Brewster’s angle doesn’t exist for perpendicular
polarization at oblique incidence for a non-magnetic or
dielectric medium (see textbook for derivation)
For magnetic medium
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum78
For magnetic medium
( )
( ) ( )
2
2 1 22 2 2 2 2
2 2
1 2 1 2 1 11 2
sin sin ;tanTE TE TE
B B B
n
n
µ µ µ µ µ µ
θ θ θ
µ µ µ µ µµ µ
−
∴ = = ⇒ = = =
+ +−
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
Brewster angle exist for oblique incidence (perpendicular
polarization) for interface between two magnetic media
An incident wave consisting of both polarizations will have
reflected wave for only one polarization for Brewster angle
Brewster angle is also known as Polarizing angle (used in
optics and lasers)
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum79
Polarizing angle
optics and lasers)
In other words, an incident wave which is composed of both
TE andTM waves will have reflectedTE (TM) waves only for
dielectric (magnetic) media interface
Thus, a circularly polarized incident wave at polarizing angle
will become a linearly polarized wave
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
6.3.4Total internal reflection:
Used in optical fibers
Light strikes an angle of incidence greater than critical angle,
all of the light energy will be reflected back, and
none of them will be absorbed
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum80
none of them will be absorbed
This critical angle is related to the refractive index of the two
media and is given by
where are the refractive index of medium 2 and 1
respectively
1 2
1
sinc
n
n
θ −  
=  
 
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
In fact, this can be observed for both the polarizations we
have discussed above
From Snell’s Second law, we have,
2
1 2
sin
sin sin sin t
i t i
γ θ
γ θ γ θ θ
γ
= ⇒ =
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum81
If we consider non-magnetic materials (dielectrics) of , in
that case,
1 2
1
sin sin sini t iγ θ γ θ θ
γ
= ⇒ =
2
1
sin
sin t
i
ε θ
θ
ε
⇒ =
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
Hence, for
(it means the transmitted wave travels along the interface, for
our case, it is x-axis) which implies that
,
2
i c t
π
θ θ θ= =
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum82
our case, it is x-axis) which implies that
2 1 2
11
sin sinc c
ε ε
θ θ
εε
−
 
⇒ = ⇒ =   
 
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
We can write the above relation as
Note that to have a real value of critical angle
1 1 1 10 2 0 22 2 2 2
1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1
sin sin sin sinr r r r
c
r r r r
n
n
µ µ ε εε µ ε
θ
ε µ µ ε ε µ ε
− − − −
      
= = = =          
     
ε ε>
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum83
Note that to have a real value of critical angle
Besides, we have assumed that for a dielectric,
1 2ε ε>
1 2 1r rµ µ= =
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
What will happen when the angle of incidence is greater than
the critical angle?
For all angles greater than the critical angle,
using Snell’s second law, and
noting that waves are moving from a denser to a rarer dielectric
medium,
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum84
medium,
The value of should be imaginary
1 1 2
2 2
sin
sin 1 cos 1 sini
i c t t t
µ ε θ
θ θ θ θ θ
µ ε
> ∴ = > ⇒ = ± −Q
cos tθ
1 2 1r rµ µ= = 1 2ε ε>
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
It can be shown that (see textbook for derivation)
For z>0, since is an imaginary number, is
also purely imaginary
2 2
2 2
0 02 cos 2 cos* *
2 2
ˆ ˆsin cost tj z j z
t t
E E
S E H x e z eβ θ β θτ τ
θ θ
η η
− −
∴ = × = +
r r r
cos tθ *
cos tθ
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum85
also purely imaginary
Hence, the second term is imaginary, therefore, no real
power is flowing along z-axis in region II
The first term which has direction along x-axis is real and is
exponentially decaying with z
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
Hence,
When a wave is incident at an angle of incidence greater than
or equal to the critical angle from region I,
the wave will be total internally reflected in region I
Surface waves exist in the region II,
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum86
Surface waves exist in the region II,
which is propagating along x-axis (direction of power flow),
and
attenuating very fast along z-axis
People have used this for communications using submarines
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
6.3.5 Effects on polarization:
Since any arbitrary wave incident obliquely from region I can
be decomposed into linear combinations of TE andTM
waves and
we also know that the expressions for reflection and
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum87
we also know that the expressions for reflection and
transmission coefficients for parallel and perpendicular
polarizations are different
2 1
2 1
cos cos
;
cos cos
i t
TE
i t
η θ η θ
η θ η θ
−
Γ =
+
2 1
2 1
cos cos
cos cos
t i
TM
t i
η θ η θ
η θ η θ
−
Γ =
+
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
So, any circularly polarized incident wave will
become elliptically polarized after reflection or transmission
Similarly, a linearly polarized wave (note that linear
polarization could be expressed as linear combination of
RHCP and LHCP) may be
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum88
RHCP and LHCP) may be
rotated after reflection
6.3 Plane wave reflection from media
interface at oblique incidence
For instance,
If the region II is a perfect conductor, η2=0, Г=-1 for both
TE andTM cases,
this means a RHCP wave after reflection will become LHCP
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum89
this means a RHCP wave after reflection will become LHCP
wave and vice versa
This is why circular polarization is not used for indoor
communication systems since we have many reflections inside a
room
6.4 Summary
Plane waves reflection from a media interface
Normal incidence
TE
Lossless
Oblique incidence
Lossy conducting
medium
Perfect
conductor
TM
Brewster
angle
Effect on
polarization
2 1
2 1
;
η η
η η
−
Γ =
+
2
1 2
2η
τ
η η
=
+
τ→0 and Γ→-1
2 1
2 1
cos cos
cos cos
i t
TE
i t
η θ η θ
η θ η θ
−
Γ =
+
2
2 1
2 cos
cos cos
i
TE
i t
η θ
τ
η θ η θ
=
+
cos cosη θ η θ−
CP EP
3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum90
Lossless
medium
Good conductor
Fig. 6.7 Plane waves reflection from media interface in a nutshell
angle Total internal
reflection
( )
2
21 1
0
1
1 1 1
ˆRe
2 2
avgS S z E
η
− Γ
= • =
r
1 2
avg avgS S=
2 1
2 1
cos cos
cos cos
t i
TM
t i
η θ η θ
η θ η θ
−
∴Γ =
+
2
2 1
2 cos
cos cos
i
TM
t i
η θ
τ
η θ η θ
=
+
CP EP








= −
1
21
sin
ε
ε
θc
1
2
1
2
tan
n
nTM
B ==
ε
ε
θ
1
2
1
2
tan
n
nTE
B ==
µ
µ
θ
1 1 2
2 2
sin
sin 1 cos 1 sini
i c t t t
µ ε θ
θ θ θ θ θ
µ ε
> ∴ = > ⇒ = ± −Q( ) z
avg eEzSS α
η
2
2
2
2
0
2 1
2
1
ˆRe
2
1 −+ Γ−
=•=
r

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

operational amplifiers
operational amplifiersoperational amplifiers
operational amplifiersPatel Jay
 
Frequency response
Frequency responseFrequency response
Frequency responsePatel Jay
 
transmission-line-and-waveguide-ppt
transmission-line-and-waveguide-ppttransmission-line-and-waveguide-ppt
transmission-line-and-waveguide-pptATTO RATHORE
 
integrator and differentiator op-amp
integrator and differentiator op-ampintegrator and differentiator op-amp
integrator and differentiator op-ampdanish iqbal
 
Ssb generation method
Ssb generation methodSsb generation method
Ssb generation methodjahirpatel
 
Cascade and cascode amplifiers
Cascade and cascode amplifiersCascade and cascode amplifiers
Cascade and cascode amplifiersPRAVEENA N G
 
Chapter 2 signals and spectra,
Chapter 2   signals and spectra,Chapter 2   signals and spectra,
Chapter 2 signals and spectra,nahrain university
 
Amplitude modulation
Amplitude modulationAmplitude modulation
Amplitude modulationRumah Belajar
 
Transmission lines, Waveguide, Antennas
Transmission lines, Waveguide, AntennasTransmission lines, Waveguide, Antennas
Transmission lines, Waveguide, AntennasKumar Pawar
 
Unit_5_Lecture-2_characteristic impedance of the transmission line
Unit_5_Lecture-2_characteristic impedance of the transmission lineUnit_5_Lecture-2_characteristic impedance of the transmission line
Unit_5_Lecture-2_characteristic impedance of the transmission lineMd Khaja Mohiddin
 
Unit IV Boundary Conditions
Unit IV  Boundary ConditionsUnit IV  Boundary Conditions
Unit IV Boundary ConditionsKannanKrishnana
 
Microwave Engineering Lecture Notes
Microwave Engineering Lecture NotesMicrowave Engineering Lecture Notes
Microwave Engineering Lecture NotesFellowBuddy.com
 

Mais procurados (20)

Magic tee
Magic tee  Magic tee
Magic tee
 
operational amplifiers
operational amplifiersoperational amplifiers
operational amplifiers
 
Frequency response
Frequency responseFrequency response
Frequency response
 
transmission-line-and-waveguide-ppt
transmission-line-and-waveguide-ppttransmission-line-and-waveguide-ppt
transmission-line-and-waveguide-ppt
 
Waveguide 3.1.3 3.2.1
Waveguide 3.1.3 3.2.1Waveguide 3.1.3 3.2.1
Waveguide 3.1.3 3.2.1
 
integrator and differentiator op-amp
integrator and differentiator op-ampintegrator and differentiator op-amp
integrator and differentiator op-amp
 
Ssb generation method
Ssb generation methodSsb generation method
Ssb generation method
 
Sky wave propogation
Sky wave propogationSky wave propogation
Sky wave propogation
 
Cascade and cascode amplifiers
Cascade and cascode amplifiersCascade and cascode amplifiers
Cascade and cascode amplifiers
 
Ujt uni junction transistor - basics
Ujt   uni junction transistor - basicsUjt   uni junction transistor - basics
Ujt uni junction transistor - basics
 
Chapter 2 signals and spectra,
Chapter 2   signals and spectra,Chapter 2   signals and spectra,
Chapter 2 signals and spectra,
 
Amplitude modulation
Amplitude modulationAmplitude modulation
Amplitude modulation
 
Transmission lines, Waveguide, Antennas
Transmission lines, Waveguide, AntennasTransmission lines, Waveguide, Antennas
Transmission lines, Waveguide, Antennas
 
Unit_5_Lecture-2_characteristic impedance of the transmission line
Unit_5_Lecture-2_characteristic impedance of the transmission lineUnit_5_Lecture-2_characteristic impedance of the transmission line
Unit_5_Lecture-2_characteristic impedance of the transmission line
 
Unit IV Boundary Conditions
Unit IV  Boundary ConditionsUnit IV  Boundary Conditions
Unit IV Boundary Conditions
 
Field Effect Transistor
Field Effect TransistorField Effect Transistor
Field Effect Transistor
 
Microwave Engineering Lecture Notes
Microwave Engineering Lecture NotesMicrowave Engineering Lecture Notes
Microwave Engineering Lecture Notes
 
Distortionless Transmission Line
Distortionless Transmission LineDistortionless Transmission Line
Distortionless Transmission Line
 
Smith chart basics
Smith chart basicsSmith chart basics
Smith chart basics
 
Directional couplers 22
Directional couplers 22Directional couplers 22
Directional couplers 22
 

Destaque

Plane waves reflection refraction and polarization by dinesh.V.raj
Plane waves reflection refraction and polarization by dinesh.V.rajPlane waves reflection refraction and polarization by dinesh.V.raj
Plane waves reflection refraction and polarization by dinesh.V.rajdineshraj007
 
Electromagnetic waves ii
Electromagnetic waves iiElectromagnetic waves ii
Electromagnetic waves iimmlodro
 
なぜ、WAVE DASH(U+301C)例示字形はずっと修正されなかったのか
なぜ、WAVE DASH(U+301C)例示字形はずっと修正されなかったのかなぜ、WAVE DASH(U+301C)例示字形はずっと修正されなかったのか
なぜ、WAVE DASH(U+301C)例示字形はずっと修正されなかったのかKatsuhiro OGATA
 
ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI AFFILIATED INSTITUTIONS R-2008 B.TECH. INFORMATION T...
ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI AFFILIATED INSTITUTIONS R-2008 B.TECH. INFORMATION T...ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI AFFILIATED INSTITUTIONS R-2008 B.TECH. INFORMATION T...
ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI AFFILIATED INSTITUTIONS R-2008 B.TECH. INFORMATION T...Anirudhan Guru
 
Top 10 utilities interview questions with answers
Top 10 utilities interview questions with answersTop 10 utilities interview questions with answers
Top 10 utilities interview questions with answerslibbygray000
 
Electromagnetic waves( college)
Electromagnetic waves( college)Electromagnetic waves( college)
Electromagnetic waves( college)Terence Pereira
 
The wave eqution presentation
The wave eqution presentationThe wave eqution presentation
The wave eqution presentationMuhammad Saqib
 
Antenna PARAMETERS
Antenna PARAMETERSAntenna PARAMETERS
Antenna PARAMETERSAJAL A J
 
Electromagnetic waves i
Electromagnetic waves iElectromagnetic waves i
Electromagnetic waves immlodro
 
1.2 reflection of waves
1.2 reflection of waves1.2 reflection of waves
1.2 reflection of wavesNurul Fadhilah
 
Presentation on Polarization
Presentation on PolarizationPresentation on Polarization
Presentation on Polarization12inch
 
POLARIZATION
POLARIZATIONPOLARIZATION
POLARIZATIONKANNAN
 

Destaque (20)

Plane waves reflection refraction and polarization by dinesh.V.raj
Plane waves reflection refraction and polarization by dinesh.V.rajPlane waves reflection refraction and polarization by dinesh.V.raj
Plane waves reflection refraction and polarization by dinesh.V.raj
 
Electromagnetic waves ii
Electromagnetic waves iiElectromagnetic waves ii
Electromagnetic waves ii
 
なぜ、WAVE DASH(U+301C)例示字形はずっと修正されなかったのか
なぜ、WAVE DASH(U+301C)例示字形はずっと修正されなかったのかなぜ、WAVE DASH(U+301C)例示字形はずっと修正されなかったのか
なぜ、WAVE DASH(U+301C)例示字形はずっと修正されなかったのか
 
ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI AFFILIATED INSTITUTIONS R-2008 B.TECH. INFORMATION T...
ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI AFFILIATED INSTITUTIONS R-2008 B.TECH. INFORMATION T...ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI AFFILIATED INSTITUTIONS R-2008 B.TECH. INFORMATION T...
ANNA UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI AFFILIATED INSTITUTIONS R-2008 B.TECH. INFORMATION T...
 
wave pro.....
wave pro.....wave pro.....
wave pro.....
 
Lecture18 2013
Lecture18 2013Lecture18 2013
Lecture18 2013
 
5 slides
5 slides5 slides
5 slides
 
Top 10 utilities interview questions with answers
Top 10 utilities interview questions with answersTop 10 utilities interview questions with answers
Top 10 utilities interview questions with answers
 
Electromagnetic waves( college)
Electromagnetic waves( college)Electromagnetic waves( college)
Electromagnetic waves( college)
 
Electromagnetic waves
Electromagnetic wavesElectromagnetic waves
Electromagnetic waves
 
The wave eqution presentation
The wave eqution presentationThe wave eqution presentation
The wave eqution presentation
 
FUNDAMENTAL PARAMETERS OF ANTENNA
FUNDAMENTAL PARAMETERS OF ANTENNAFUNDAMENTAL PARAMETERS OF ANTENNA
FUNDAMENTAL PARAMETERS OF ANTENNA
 
Antenna PARAMETERS
Antenna PARAMETERSAntenna PARAMETERS
Antenna PARAMETERS
 
Electromagnetic waves i
Electromagnetic waves iElectromagnetic waves i
Electromagnetic waves i
 
1.2 reflection of waves
1.2 reflection of waves1.2 reflection of waves
1.2 reflection of waves
 
Presentation on Polarization
Presentation on PolarizationPresentation on Polarization
Presentation on Polarization
 
Antenna
AntennaAntenna
Antenna
 
POLARIZATION
POLARIZATIONPOLARIZATION
POLARIZATION
 
Inguinal Hernia
Inguinal HerniaInguinal Hernia
Inguinal Hernia
 
Antenna
AntennaAntenna
Antenna
 

Semelhante a 6 slides

Hamiltonian Approach for Electromagnetic Field in One-dimensional Photonic Cr...
Hamiltonian Approach for Electromagnetic Field in One-dimensional Photonic Cr...Hamiltonian Approach for Electromagnetic Field in One-dimensional Photonic Cr...
Hamiltonian Approach for Electromagnetic Field in One-dimensional Photonic Cr...IRJET Journal
 
Propagation of ELF Radiation from RS-LC System and Red Sprites in Earth- Iono...
Propagation of ELF Radiation from RS-LC System and Red Sprites in Earth- Iono...Propagation of ELF Radiation from RS-LC System and Red Sprites in Earth- Iono...
Propagation of ELF Radiation from RS-LC System and Red Sprites in Earth- Iono...degarden
 
Propagation of ELF Radiation from RS-LC System and Red Sprites in Earth- Iono...
Propagation of ELF Radiation from RS-LC System and Red Sprites in Earth- Iono...Propagation of ELF Radiation from RS-LC System and Red Sprites in Earth- Iono...
Propagation of ELF Radiation from RS-LC System and Red Sprites in Earth- Iono...degarden
 
CBSE-Class-12-Physics-Question-Paper-Solution-2019-Set-1.pdf
CBSE-Class-12-Physics-Question-Paper-Solution-2019-Set-1.pdfCBSE-Class-12-Physics-Question-Paper-Solution-2019-Set-1.pdf
CBSE-Class-12-Physics-Question-Paper-Solution-2019-Set-1.pdfPratimaAditya2
 
Optical properties of semiconductors ppt
Optical properties of semiconductors pptOptical properties of semiconductors ppt
Optical properties of semiconductors ppttedoado
 
Reflection & Refraction.pptx
Reflection & Refraction.pptxReflection & Refraction.pptx
Reflection & Refraction.pptxPaulBoro1
 
A parallel-polarized uniform plane wave is incident obliquely on a lo.pdf
A parallel-polarized uniform plane wave is incident obliquely on a lo.pdfA parallel-polarized uniform plane wave is incident obliquely on a lo.pdf
A parallel-polarized uniform plane wave is incident obliquely on a lo.pdfaroraenterprisesmbd
 
Electric field for k12 student
Electric field for k12 studentElectric field for k12 student
Electric field for k12 studentArun Umrao
 
Principle of Electric Field - Physics - by Arun Umrao
Principle of Electric Field - Physics - by Arun UmraoPrinciple of Electric Field - Physics - by Arun Umrao
Principle of Electric Field - Physics - by Arun Umraossuserd6b1fd
 
NMR SPECTROSCOPY.pptx
NMR SPECTROSCOPY.pptxNMR SPECTROSCOPY.pptx
NMR SPECTROSCOPY.pptxManimegalaiG3
 
Design of metamaterial absorber using eight resistive-arm cell for simultaneo...
Design of metamaterial absorber using eight resistive-arm cell for simultaneo...Design of metamaterial absorber using eight resistive-arm cell for simultaneo...
Design of metamaterial absorber using eight resistive-arm cell for simultaneo...Tuấn Tạ Minh
 

Semelhante a 6 slides (20)

1 slides
1 slides1 slides
1 slides
 
3 slides
3 slides3 slides
3 slides
 
Hamiltonian Approach for Electromagnetic Field in One-dimensional Photonic Cr...
Hamiltonian Approach for Electromagnetic Field in One-dimensional Photonic Cr...Hamiltonian Approach for Electromagnetic Field in One-dimensional Photonic Cr...
Hamiltonian Approach for Electromagnetic Field in One-dimensional Photonic Cr...
 
7 slides
7 slides7 slides
7 slides
 
8 slides
8 slides8 slides
8 slides
 
Propagation of ELF Radiation from RS-LC System and Red Sprites in Earth- Iono...
Propagation of ELF Radiation from RS-LC System and Red Sprites in Earth- Iono...Propagation of ELF Radiation from RS-LC System and Red Sprites in Earth- Iono...
Propagation of ELF Radiation from RS-LC System and Red Sprites in Earth- Iono...
 
Propagation of ELF Radiation from RS-LC System and Red Sprites in Earth- Iono...
Propagation of ELF Radiation from RS-LC System and Red Sprites in Earth- Iono...Propagation of ELF Radiation from RS-LC System and Red Sprites in Earth- Iono...
Propagation of ELF Radiation from RS-LC System and Red Sprites in Earth- Iono...
 
A011210108
A011210108A011210108
A011210108
 
Antenna basic
Antenna basicAntenna basic
Antenna basic
 
D1103042431
D1103042431D1103042431
D1103042431
 
CBSE-Class-12-Physics-Question-Paper-Solution-2019-Set-1.pdf
CBSE-Class-12-Physics-Question-Paper-Solution-2019-Set-1.pdfCBSE-Class-12-Physics-Question-Paper-Solution-2019-Set-1.pdf
CBSE-Class-12-Physics-Question-Paper-Solution-2019-Set-1.pdf
 
Optical properties of semiconductors ppt
Optical properties of semiconductors pptOptical properties of semiconductors ppt
Optical properties of semiconductors ppt
 
Reflection & Refraction.pptx
Reflection & Refraction.pptxReflection & Refraction.pptx
Reflection & Refraction.pptx
 
antennas1.pdf
antennas1.pdfantennas1.pdf
antennas1.pdf
 
A parallel-polarized uniform plane wave is incident obliquely on a lo.pdf
A parallel-polarized uniform plane wave is incident obliquely on a lo.pdfA parallel-polarized uniform plane wave is incident obliquely on a lo.pdf
A parallel-polarized uniform plane wave is incident obliquely on a lo.pdf
 
2 slides
2 slides2 slides
2 slides
 
Electric field for k12 student
Electric field for k12 studentElectric field for k12 student
Electric field for k12 student
 
Principle of Electric Field - Physics - by Arun Umrao
Principle of Electric Field - Physics - by Arun UmraoPrinciple of Electric Field - Physics - by Arun Umrao
Principle of Electric Field - Physics - by Arun Umrao
 
NMR SPECTROSCOPY.pptx
NMR SPECTROSCOPY.pptxNMR SPECTROSCOPY.pptx
NMR SPECTROSCOPY.pptx
 
Design of metamaterial absorber using eight resistive-arm cell for simultaneo...
Design of metamaterial absorber using eight resistive-arm cell for simultaneo...Design of metamaterial absorber using eight resistive-arm cell for simultaneo...
Design of metamaterial absorber using eight resistive-arm cell for simultaneo...
 

Mais de Gopi Saiteja

Mais de Gopi Saiteja (20)

Trees gt(1)
Trees gt(1)Trees gt(1)
Trees gt(1)
 
Topic11 sortingandsearching
Topic11 sortingandsearchingTopic11 sortingandsearching
Topic11 sortingandsearching
 
Heapsort
HeapsortHeapsort
Heapsort
 
Hashing gt1
Hashing gt1Hashing gt1
Hashing gt1
 
Ee693 sept2014quizgt2
Ee693 sept2014quizgt2Ee693 sept2014quizgt2
Ee693 sept2014quizgt2
 
Ee693 sept2014quizgt1
Ee693 sept2014quizgt1Ee693 sept2014quizgt1
Ee693 sept2014quizgt1
 
Ee693 sept2014quiz1
Ee693 sept2014quiz1Ee693 sept2014quiz1
Ee693 sept2014quiz1
 
Ee693 sept2014midsem
Ee693 sept2014midsemEe693 sept2014midsem
Ee693 sept2014midsem
 
Ee693 questionshomework
Ee693 questionshomeworkEe693 questionshomework
Ee693 questionshomework
 
Dynamic programming
Dynamic programmingDynamic programming
Dynamic programming
 
Cs105 l15-bucket radix
Cs105 l15-bucket radixCs105 l15-bucket radix
Cs105 l15-bucket radix
 
Chapter11 sorting algorithmsefficiency
Chapter11 sorting algorithmsefficiencyChapter11 sorting algorithmsefficiency
Chapter11 sorting algorithmsefficiency
 
Answers withexplanations
Answers withexplanationsAnswers withexplanations
Answers withexplanations
 
Sorting
SortingSorting
Sorting
 
Solution(1)
Solution(1)Solution(1)
Solution(1)
 
Pthread
PthreadPthread
Pthread
 
Open mp
Open mpOpen mp
Open mp
 
Introduction
IntroductionIntroduction
Introduction
 
Cuda
CudaCuda
Cuda
 
Vector space interpretation_of_random_variables
Vector space interpretation_of_random_variablesVector space interpretation_of_random_variables
Vector space interpretation_of_random_variables
 

6 slides

  • 1. Dr. Rakhesh Singh Kshetrimayum 6. Plane waves reflection from media interface Dr. Rakhesh Singh Kshetrimayum 3/25/20141 Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum
  • 2. 6.1 Introduction Plane waves reflection from a media interface Normal incidence TE Oblique incidencePerfect conductor 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum2 TE Lossless medium Good conductor Fig. 6.1 Plane waves reflection from media interface Lossy conducting medium TM Brewster angle Total internal reflection Effect on polarization
  • 3. 6.1 Introduction Till now, we have studied plane waves in various medium Let us try to explore how plane waves will behave at a media interface In practical scenarios of wireless and mobile communications, radio wave will reflect from walls & other obstacles on its path When a radio wave reflects from a surface, the strength of the reflected waves is less than that of the incident wave 3/25/20143 Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum
  • 4. 6.1 Introduction The ratio of the two (reflected wave/incident wave) is known as the‘reflection coefficient’ of the surface This ratio depends on the conductivity (σ), permittivity (ε) and 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum4 permittivity (ε) and permeability (µ) of the material that forms the reflective surface as well as material properties of the air from which the radio wave is incident
  • 5. 6.1 Introduction Some part of the wave will be transmitted through the material How much of the incident wave has been transmitted through the material is also dependent on the material parameters mentioned above 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum5 also dependent on the material parameters mentioned above It is given by another ratio known as‘transmission coefficient’ It is the ratio of the transmitted wave divided by the incident wave
  • 6. 6.1 Introduction In plane wave reflection from media interface, what we will be doing is basically writing down the electric and magnetic field expressions 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum6 magnetic field expressions in all the regions of interest and apply the boundary conditions to get the values of the transmission and reflection coefficients
  • 7. 6.1 Introduction One of the possible applications of such an exercise is in wireless communication, where we have to find the transmission and reflection coefficients of multipaths 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum7 multipaths Electromagnetic waves are often reflected or scattered or diffracted at one or more obstacles before arriving at the receiver
  • 8. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence For smooth surfaces, EM waves are reflected; For rough surfaces, EM waves are scattered; For edges of surfaces, 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum8 For edges of surfaces, EM waves are diffracted Fig. 6.2 depicts multipath for a mobile receiver in the car from direct, reflected and diffracted waves of the signal sent from the base station
  • 9. 6.1 Introduction 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum9 Fig. 6.2 Illustration of reflected and diffracted wave in mobile communications (this chapter’s study will be very helpful in understanding wireless and mobile communications)
  • 10. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence We will consider the case of normal incidence, when the incident wave propagation vector is along the normal to the interface between two media 6.2.1 Lossy conducting medium We will assume plane waves with electric field vector 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum10 We will assume plane waves with electric field vector oriented along the x-axis and propagating along the positive z-axis without loss of generality For z<0 (we will refer this region as region I and it is assumed to be a lossy medium)
  • 11. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Let us do a more generalized analysis by assuming this region I as a lossy medium It could be a lossless medium like free space The incident electric and magnetic fields can be expressed as 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum11 1 ˆ z i oE xE e γ− = r 1 1 1 ˆ z i oH y E e γ η − = r
  • 12. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence where η1 is the medium 1 wave impedance and Eo is the arbitrary amplitude of the incident electric field The expression for intrinsic wave impedance and propagation constant 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum12 ( ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 ; 1 j j j j j j jj j ωµ ωµ ωµ σ η γ α β ω µ ε γ ωε σ ωεωµ ωε σ = = = = + = − ++
  • 13. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence iE r E r 2 t γ r 1 i γ r iH r tE r tH r iE r r 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum13 2 2 2, ,ε µ σ rE r 1 1 1, ,ε µ σ 1 r γ r rH r rE r Fig. 6.3A plane EM wave is incident from region I or medium 1 for z<0
  • 14. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Convention: a circle with a dot in the center an arrow pointing perpendicularly out of the page and a circle with a cross an arrow pointing perpendicularly into the page) 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum14 the page) Notation for fields: subscript i incident, r reflected and t transmitted
  • 15. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Note that the incident wave from region I will be partially reflected and transmitted at the media interface between two regions For reflected wave, z<0, wave direction is in the –z axis and the reflected electric field is expressed as 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum15 the reflected electric field is expressed as where the Γ is the reflection coefficient 1 ˆ z r oE x E e γ+ = Γ r
  • 16. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence The reflection coefficient is defined as the ratio of amplitude of the reflected electric field divided by amplitude of the incident electric field as follows: r i E E Γ = 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum16 The reflected magnetic field can be obtained from the reflected electric field using the Maxwell’s curl equations as iE
  • 17. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence 1 1 1 1 1 ˆ ˆ ˆ 0 0 r r r r r z o E j H x y z E j E j H j x y z E e γ ωµ ωµ ωµ ωµ + ∇× = − ∇× ∇× ∂ ∂ ∂ ⇒ = − = = ∂ ∂ ∂ Γ r r r r r 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum17 ( ) ( ) ( )1 1 11 1 1 1 1 0 0 ˆ ˆ ˆ o z z z o o o E e j j y E e y E e y E e z j γ γ γγ γ ωµ ωµ ωµ + + + Γ ∂  = Γ = Γ = − Γ  ∂  1 1 ˆ z r oH y E e γ η +Γ ∴ = − r
  • 18. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Therefore, the Poynting vector for reflected wave of region I is shows power is traveling in the -z axis for the reflected wave 2 2* 2 * 1 ˆz r r r o z S E H E e α η + = × == − Γ r r r 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum18 shows power is traveling in the -z axis for the reflected wave For transmitted wave, z>0, wave is propagating in lossy medium 2 (we will refer this region as region II),
  • 19. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence where η is the wave impedance of lossy medium 2 and τ is z ot eExE 2ˆ γτ − = r zo t e E yH 2 2 ˆ γ η τ − = r 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum19 where η2 is the wave impedance of lossy medium 2 and τ is the transmission coefficient intrinsic wave impedance and propagation constant are
  • 20. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence transmission coefficient is defined as the ratio of amplitude of the transmitted electric field divided by amplitude of the ( ) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 ; 1 j j j j j j jj j ωµ ωµ ωµ σ η γ α β ω µ ε γ ωε σ ωεωµ ωε σ = = = = + = − ++ 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum20 the transmitted electric field divided by amplitude of the incident electric field as follows: t i E E τ =
  • 21. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Our intention here is to find the transmission and reflection coefficients Let us rewrite the fields in the two regions: region I (z<0) and region II (z>0) (seeTable 6.1) and Apply the boundary conditions to obtain the two unknown 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum21 Apply the boundary conditions to obtain the two unknown coefficients
  • 22. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Region I (lossy medium 1) Region II (lossy medium 2) Table 6.1 Fields in the two lossy regions (normal incidence) 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum22 1 ˆ z i oE xE e γ− = r 1 1 1 ˆ z i oH y E e γ η − = r 1 ˆ z r oE x E e γ+ = Γ r 1 1 ˆ z r oH y E e γ η +Γ = − r z ot eExE 2ˆ γτ − = r zo t e E yH 2 2 ˆ γ η τ − = r
  • 23. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence This is basically boundary value problem with boundary conditions at z=0 Note that total electric and magnetic fields (both incident and reflected) are tangential to the interface at z=0 Similarly, the transmitted electric and magnetic field are also 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum23 Similarly, the transmitted electric and magnetic field are also tangential to the interface at z=0 Also note that there are no surface current density at the interface Hence, the tangential components of electric and magnetic fields must be continuous at the interface z=0
  • 24. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Therefore, ( ) 0 00 1 1i r t z E E E E Eτ τ = + = ⇒ + Γ = ⇒ + Γ = r r r 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 1 i r t z H H H E E τ τ η η η η=    − Γ − Γ + = ⇒ = ⇒ =        r r r 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum24 Therefore, Hence, ( ) ( ) 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 η ητ η η η η η η η η −− Γ − Γ + Γ = ⇒ = ⇒ − Γ = + Γ ⇒ Γ = + 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 η η η τ η η η η − = + Γ = + = + +
  • 25. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence 6.2.2 Lossless medium If the regions are lossless dielectric, then, σ = 0 and µ and ε are real quantities The propagation constant for this case is purely imaginary and can be written as 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum25 and can be written as γ = jβ =jω√(µε) The wave impedance of the dielectric is η= = = = =jωµ γ j j ωµ β ωµ ω µε µ ε r r ε µ η0
  • 26. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence For a lossless medium, η is real, so, both Γ and τ are real Electric and magnetic fields are in phase with each other The wavelength in the dielectric is 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum26 The wavelength in the dielectric is = = And the phase velocity is = = = where c is the speed of light in free space λ 2π β 2π ω µε pv ω β µε 1 rr c εµ
  • 27. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Table 6.2 Fields in the two lossless regions (normal incidence) Region I (lossless medium 1) Region II (lossless medium 2) 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum27 1 ˆ j z i oE xE e β− = r 1 1 1 ˆ j z i oH y E e β η − = r 1 ˆ j z r oE x E e β+ = Γ r 1 1 ˆ j z r oH y E e β η +Γ = − r 2 ˆ j z t oE x E e β τ − = r 2 2 ˆ j zo t E H y e β τ η − = r
  • 28. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Applying the boundary conditions like before, we can get the expression for reflection and transmission coefficients, we will get the same expression as before 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum28 we will get the same expression as before 2 1 2 1 ; η η η η − Γ = + 2 1 2 2η τ η η = +
  • 29. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Poynting vector in region I ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )1 1 1 1 * * * * 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆj z j z j z j z tot tot i r i r E E S E H E E H H E e x E e x e y e yβ β β β η η − + −  = × = + × + = + Γ × −Γ    r r r r r r r 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2j z j zβ β− +   Γ Γ Γ Γ 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum29 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 02 1 1 1 ˆ ˆ1 ˆ1 2 sin 2 j z j z j z j z E E e E e E E E z e e z E E j z z β β β β η η η η η η β η η − + + −    Γ Γ Γ Γ    = − + − = − Γ + −            Γ  = − Γ −    
  • 30. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Poynting vector in region II ( )2 2 * 22 02 * 0 0 2 2 ˆ ˆ ˆj z j z t t EE S E H x E e e y zβ β ττ τ η η − −  = × = × =    r r r 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum30 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 2 2 12 2 1 2 2 2 2 12 1 2 1 2 1 4 41 1 1 η η η η η ηη η η η η η − −Γ − Γ = − = ⇒ = + + + Q ( ) ( ) 222 2 2 02 22 2 2 2 1 1 2 12 1 12 4 1 ˆ E S z η η τ τ τ η η η η ηη η − Γ− Γ = ⇒ = ⇒ = ∴ = + + r
  • 31. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Power conservation Compare the time average power flow in the two regions For z <0, the time average power flow through 1m2 cross section is ( ) 2 1 1 1− Γr 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum31 And for z >0, the time average power flow through 1m2 cross section is ( ) 2 21 1 0 1 1 1 1 ˆRe 2 2 avgS S z E η − Γ = • = r ( ) 2 22 2 0 1 1 1 1 ˆRe 2 2 avgS S z E η − Γ = • = r
  • 32. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Hence, So real power is conserved 6.2.3 Good conductor: If the region II (z >0) is a good (but not perfect) conductor 1 2 avg avgS S= 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum32 If the region II (z >0) is a good (but not perfect) conductor and region I is a lossless medium like free space, the propagation constant for medium 2 is
  • 33. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence where δ is the skin depth for the medium 2, which is a good conductor Similarly, the intrinsic impedance of the conducting medium ( ) ( )2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 s j j j ωµ σ γ α β δ = + = + = + 2 s 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum33 Similarly, the intrinsic impedance of the conducting medium 2 (see also example 6.2) simplifies to ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 22 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 (1 ) 2 1 1 12 2 2 1 1 1 2 21 j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j ωµωµ ωµ ωµ η γ ωµ σ σωµ σ ωµ ωµ ωµ ωµ σ σ σ σ = = = = + + + − + + = = = = + + − −
  • 34. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Now, the wave impedance of medium 2 is complex, with a phase angle of 45o so the electric and magnetic field will be 45o out of phase and Γ and τ will be complex. Now, let us write down the field expressions in region I and 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum34 Now, let us write down the field expressions in region I and II for lossless dielectric (region I) and good conductor (region II) interface
  • 35. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Table 6.4 Fields in the two regions (normal incidence) Region I (lossless medium) Region II (good conductor) 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum35 1 ˆ j z i oE xE e β− = r 1 1 1 ˆ j z i oH y E e β η − = r 1 ˆ j z r oE x E e β+ = Γ r 1 1 ˆ j z r oH y E e β η +Γ = − r 2 ˆ z t oE x E e γ τ − = r 2 2 ˆ zo t E H y e γ τ η − = r
  • 36. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Applying the boundary conditions like before, we can get the expression for reflection and transmission coefficients, we will get the same expression as before 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum36 we will get the same expression as before 2 1 2 1 ; η η η η − Γ = + 2 1 2 2η τ η η = +
  • 37. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Note that we have to use the previous expressions for intrinsic wave impedances for lossless medium and good conductor 1 ; µ η ε = ( ) 2 2 1 2 j ωµ η σ = + 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum37 Power conservation let us find out the Poynting vector in the two regions Noting that the field in region I comprise of incident and reflected wave, we can write the Poynting vector for z <0 ε ( )2 2 1 2 jη σ = +
  • 38. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence For z >0, only transmitted fields exist and we can write ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 * * * * 1 1 1 *0 0 0 0 1 1 2 20 2 2* 1 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ1 j z j z j z j z tot tot i r i r j z j z E E S E H E E H H E e x E e x e y e y E e e z β β β β β β η η η − + − − +   = × = + × + = + Γ × − Γ    = − Γ + Γ − Γ r r r r r r r 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum38 For z >0, only transmitted fields exist and we can write down the Poynting vector as ( ) * 2 2* * 02 * 20 0 * * 2 2 ˆ ˆ ˆz z z t t EE S E H x E e e y z eγ γ αττ τ η η − − −  = × = × =    r r r
  • 39. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence At z=0, ( ) 2 201 * 1 ˆ1 E S z η = − Γ + Γ − Γ r ( ) ( ) 2 2 2 2 20 0 2 02 *4 ˆ ˆ ˆ1 E E E S z z z τ η = = = − Γ + Γ − Γ r 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum39 Complex power is conserved Then the time average power flow through a 1m2 cross section can be calculated as follows Since ( ) ( )2* 2 11 2 ˆ ˆ ˆ1S z z z η ηη η = = = − Γ + Γ − Γ +
  • 40. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence is purely an imaginary number, therefore, 1 12 2* j z j z e eβ β− + −Γ + Γ ( ) 2 21 1 0 11 1 ˆRe 2 2 avgS S z E η − Γ = • = r 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum40 which shows power balance at z=0 only ( ) 0 1 ˆRe 2 2 avgS S z E η = • = ( ) z avg eEzSS α η 2 2 2 2 0 22 1 2 1 ˆRe 2 1 −Γ− =•= r
  • 41. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Note that the Poynting vector for z>0, this power density in the lossy conductor decays exponentially according to the attenuation factor 6.2.4 Perfect conductor: Now assume that the region II (z >0) contains a perfect 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum41 Now assume that the region II (z >0) contains a perfect conductor and region I is a lossless medium Let us rewrite the expressions for propagation constant and wave impedance of a good conductor and deduce the expressions for perfect conductor
  • 42. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Perfect conductor implies σ →∝, and ( ) ( )2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 s j j j ωµ σ γ α β δ = + = + = + ( ) 2 2 2 1 2 j ωµ η σ = + 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum42 Perfect conductor implies σ2→∝, and correspondingly, α2→∝, δs 2→0, η2→0 Note that Therefore, τ→0 and Γ→-1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 , η η η τ η η η η − = Γ = + +
  • 43. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Table 6.5 Fields in the two regions (normal incidence) Region I (lossless medium) Region II (perfect conductor) 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum43 1 ˆ j z i oE xE e β− = r 1 1 1 ˆ j z i oH y E e β η − = r 1 ˆ j z r oE x E e β+ = Γ r 1 1 ˆ j z r oH y E e β η +Γ = − r 0tE ≅ r 0tH ≅ r
  • 44. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence The field for z >0 thus decay infinitely fast and are identically zero in the perfect conductor as we have seen in example 6.2 as well The perfect conductor can be thought of as‘shorting out’ the incident electric field 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum44 incident electric field Now let us write down the field expressions in region I and II for lossless dielectric and perfect conductor interface (see Table 6.5)
  • 45. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Power conservation In order to see the power conservation, let us find out the Poynting vector in the two regions Noting that the field in region I comprise of incident and 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum45 incident and reflected wave, we can write the Poynting vector for z <0 (Γ=-1) ( )1 11 0 0 1 ˆ ˆ2 sinj z j z tot i rE E E xE e e x jE zβ β β− = + = − = − r r r
  • 46. 6.2 Plane wave reflection from media interface at normal incidence Therefore, the Poynting vector for z<0 is ( )1 11 0 0 1 1 1 ˆ ˆ2 cosj z j z tot i r E E H H H y e e y zβ β β η η − = + = + = r r ( ) 2 4 Er r 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum46 which has a zero real part and thus indicates that no real power is delivered to the perfect conductor Fields in region II is anyway zero and hence power is also zero ( ) 2 * 01 1 1 1 1 1 4 ˆ sin costot tot E S E H zj z zβ β η = × = − r r
  • 47. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence We will consider the problem of a plane wave obliquely incident on a plane interface between two lossy conducting regions We will first consider two particular cases of this problem as follows: 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum47 follows: the electric field is in the xz plane (parallel polarization) the electric field is in normal to the xz plane (perpendicular polarization)
  • 48. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence Any arbitrary incident plane wave can be expressed as a linear combination of these two principal polarizations The plane of incidence is that plane containing the normal vector to the interface and the direction of propagation vector of the incident wave 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum48 the direction of propagation vector of the incident wave
  • 49. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence For Fig. 6.4, this is the xz plane For perpendicular polarization (TE), electric field is perpendicular to the plane of incidence For parallel polarization (TM), electric field is parallel to the plane of incidence 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum49 electric field is parallel to the plane of incidence
  • 50. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence tt HE rr , z x rr HE rr , rθ tθ 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum50 Fig. 6.5 Oblique incidence of plane EM wave at a media interface 1 1 1 , ,ε µ σ 2 2 2, ,ε µ σ z Region II ii HE rr , Region I iθ rθ tθ nˆ
  • 51. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence 6.3.1 Perpendicular polarization (TE): In this case, electric field vector is perpendicular to the xz plane, Hence, it will have component along the y-axis Since the electric field is transversal to the plane of incidence 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum51 Since the electric field is transversal to the plane of incidence They are also known transverse electric (TE) waves
  • 52. iθ rθnˆ nˆ zˆ xˆxˆ zˆ iθγ cos1 iθγ sin1 rθγ cos1 rθγ sin11 i γ r 1 r γ r xˆ 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum52 tθnˆ zˆ 2 cos tγ θ 2 sin tγ θ 2 t γ r Fig. 6.6Wave propagation vector for (a) incident (b) reflected and (c) transmitted EM waves at oblique incidence
  • 53. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence Let us assume that the incident wave propagates in the first quadrant of xz plane without loss of generality and (incident propagation vector) makes an angle θi with the normal (see Fig. 6.6 (a)) 1 i γ r 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum53 ( ) ( ) ( )' 1 1 1 1 1 1 ˆ ˆˆ ˆcos sin cos sin cos sini i i i i i iz z x zz xx z x z xγ γ θ γ θ γ θ γ θ γ θ θ• = + • + = + = + r r ( )1 cos sin 0 ˆi iz x iE E e y γ θ θ− + = r 1 1 i i i i E E j H H j ωµ ωµ ∇× ∇× = − ⇒ = − r r r r Q
  • 54. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 1 1 1 1 1 cos sin cos sin 0 1 1 cos sin 0 cos sin cos sin 0 ˆ ˆ ˆ 1 ˆ ˆ 0 0 ˆ ˆ i i i i i i i i i i z x z x z x z x z x x y z E e e x z j x y z j z x E e E e e x z γ θ θ γ θ θ γ θ θ γ θ θ γ θ θ ωµ ωµ − + − + − + − + − +     ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂  = = − +       − ∂ ∂ ∂ − ∂ ∂          ∂ ∂  = −        ( ) { }1 cos sin0 1 ˆ ˆcos sini iz xE e x z γ θ θγ θ θ− + = − + 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum54 0 1 ˆ ˆ E e e x z j z xωµ ∂ ∂  = −       ∂ ∂     ( ) { } ( ) ( ) 1 1 cos sin0 1 1 cos sin0 1 ˆ ˆcos sin ˆ ˆcos sin i i i i z x i i z x i i E e x z j E e x z γ θ θ γ θ θ γ θ θ ωµ θ θ η − + − + = − +  = − +
  • 55. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence Let us assume that the reflected wave propagates in the second quadrant of xz plane and (reflected propagation vector) makes an angle θr with the normal (see Fig. 6.6 (b)) 1 r γ r 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum55 ( ) ( ) ( )1 1 1 1 1 1 ˆ ˆˆ ˆ' cos sin cos sin cos sinr r r r r r rz z x zz xx z x z xγ γ θ γ θ γ θ γ θ γ θ θ• = − + • + = − + = − + r r ( )1 cos sin 0 ˆr rz x r TEE E e y γ θ θ− − + = Γ r
  • 56. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence Note that and will have the same magnitude since both the waves are still in the same region I, only their direction changes Since the Poynting vector must be negative like the previous case of normal incidence, 1 r γ r 1 i γ r 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum56 case of normal incidence, You could also use the Maxwell’s curl equation below to find this ( ) ( )1 cos sin0 1 ˆ ˆcos sinr rz x r TE r r E H e x z γ θ θ θ θ η − − + = Γ + r 1ωµj E H r r − ×∇ = r r
  • 57. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence The transmitted fields will have similar expression with the incident fields except that now the θi should be replaced by θt (angle that transmitted propagation vector makes with the normal), γ1 should be replaced by γ2 (wave is in region II now) and 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum57 γ1 should be replaced by γ2 (wave is in region II now) and multiplication by (transmission coefficient) The transmitted fields are ( )2 cos sin 0 ˆ t tz x t TEE yE e γ θ θ τ − + = r ( ) ( )2 cos sin0 2 2 ˆ ˆcos sint tz xt TE t t t E E H e x z j γ θ θτ θ θ ωµ η − +∇× = = − + − r r
  • 58. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence Table 6.5 Fields in two regions (oblique incidence: perpendicular polarization) Region I (lossy medium 1) Region II (lossy medium 2) 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum58 ( )1 cos sin 0 ˆi iz x iE E e y γ θ θ− + = r ( ) ( )1 cos sin0 1 ˆ ˆcos sini iz x i i i E H e x z γ θ θ θ θ η − + = − + r ( )1 cos sin 0 ˆr rz x r TEE E e y γ θ θ− − + = Γ r ( ) ( )1 cos sin0 1 ˆ ˆcos sini iz xTE r r r E H e x z γ θ θ θ θ η − +Γ = + r ( )2 cos sin 0 ˆ t tz x t TEE yE e γ θ θ τ − + = r ( ) ( )2 cos sin0 2 ˆ ˆcos sint tz xTE t t t E H e x z γ θ θτ θ θ η − + = − + r
  • 59. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence Equating the tangential components of electric field (electric field has only Ey component and it is tangential at the interface z=0) and magnetic field (magnetic field has two components: Hx and Hz and only Hx is 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum59 (magnetic field has two components: Hx and Hz and only Hx is tangential at the interface z=0) at z=0 gives 1 21sin sinsini trx xx TE TEe e eγ θ γ θγ θ τ− −− + Γ = 1 21sin sinsin 1 1 2 1 cos cos cosi trx xxTE TE i r te e eγ θ γ θγ θ τ θ θ θ η η η − −−Γ− + = −
  • 60. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence If Ex and Hy are to be continuous at the interface z = 0 for all x, then, this x variation must be the same on both sides of the equations (also known as phase matching condition) 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum60 tri θγθγθγ sinsinsin 211 == 1 2; sin sini r i tθ θ γ θ γ θ⇒ = =
  • 61. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence The first is Snell’s law of reflection which states that the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection The second result is the Snell’s law of refraction (refraction is the change in direction of a wave due to change in 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum61 (refraction is the change in direction of a wave due to change in velocity from one medium to another medium) Also note that refractive index of a medium is defined as 0 0 0 0 r r r r p c n v µ ε µ ε µ ε µ ε = = =
  • 62. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence hence, for a lossless dielectric media, Now we can simplify above two equations by applying Snell’s 2 2 22 2 1 2 1 1 2 11 1 1 sin sin i t v n v n µ ε εθ γ β θ γ β µ ε ε = = = = = = 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum62 Now we can simplify above two equations by applying Snell’s two laws as follows 1 TE TEτ+Γ = 1 1 2 cos cos cosi r TE TE t θ θ τ θ η η η − + Γ = −
  • 63. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence The above two equations has two unknowns τTE and ГTE and it can be solved easily as follows Therefore, 2 1 1 cos cos cos i r TE TE t θ θ η τ η η θ   = −Γ    1 TE TEτ+Γ = 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum63 Therefore, 22 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 cos coscos cos 1 1 1 cos cos cos cos cos cos cos cos cos cos cos cos cos cos i ir r TE TE TE t t t t t r i t i t TE TE t t t r θ η θη η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ       + Γ = −Γ ⇒ Γ + = −               + − − ⇒ Γ = ⇒ Γ =    +   
  • 64. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence Hence, the reflection and transmission coefficients for oblique incidence (Fresnel coefficients) for perpendicular 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 cos cos cos cos cos cos 2 cos 1 1 cos cos cos cos cos cos i t t r i t i TE TE t r t r t r η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ τ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ − + + − ∴ = + Γ = + = = + + + 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum64 oblique incidence (Fresnel coefficients) for perpendicular polarization are given as follows: For normal incidence, it is a particular case and put 2 1 2 1 cos cos cos cos i t TE i t η θ η θ η θ η θ − Γ = + 2 2 1 2 cos cos cos i TE i t η θ τ η θ η θ = + 0=== tri θθθ
  • 65. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence 6.3.2 Parallel Polarization (TM): In this case, electric field vector lies in the xz plane Since the magnetic field is transversal to the plane of incidence such waves are also called as transverse magnetic (TM) waves 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum65 (TM) waves So let us start with H vector which will have only y component, ( )ii xz i e E yH θθγ η sincos 1 0 1ˆ +− = r
  • 66. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence 1 1 i i H H j E E j ωε ωε ∇× ∇× = ⇒ = r r r r Q ( ) ( )1 1cos sin cos sin ˆ ˆ ˆ 1 i i i iz x z x x y z E e e γ θ θ γ θ θ− + − +    ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂  3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum66 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) { } ( ) 1 1 1 1 1 cos sin cos sin 0 1 1 1 cos sin0 1 cos sin cos sin0 1 0 1 1 1 ˆ ˆ 0 0 ˆ ˆˆ ˆcos sin cos si i i i i i i i i i i z x z x z x z x z x i i i E e e x z j x y z j z x E e E e x z E e x z j γ θ θ γ θ θ γ θ θ γ θ θ γ θ θ ωε ωε η η γ θ θ θ ωε η − + − + − + − + − +     ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂  = = − +       ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂      = − = −( )n iθ
  • 67. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence Similar to the previous case of parallel polarization, we can write the reflected magnetic field vector as The transmitted fields will have similar expression with the ( )1 cos sin0 1 ˆ ˆ r rz xTM r E H y ye γ θ θ η − − +Γ = − r 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum67 The transmitted fields will have similar expression with the incident fields except that now the θi should be replaced by θt (angle that transmitted propagation vector makes with the normal), γ1 should be replaced by γ2 (wave is in region II) and multiplied by a factor (transmission coefficient forTM case)
  • 68. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence Table 6.6 Fields in two regions (oblique incidence: parallel ( ) ( )2 cos sin 0 ˆ ˆcos sint tz x t TM t tE E e x z γ θ θ τ θ θ − + = − r ( )2 cos sin0 2 ˆ t tz xTM t E H y e γ θ θτ η − + = r 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum68 Table 6.6 Fields in two regions (oblique incidence: parallel polarization) {next page}
  • 69. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence Region I (lossy medium 1) Region II (lossy medium 2) ( ) ( )1 cos sin 0 ˆ ˆcos sini iz x i i iE E e x z γ θ θ θ θ− + = − r ( )Er ( ) ( )2 cos sin 0 ˆ ˆcos sint tz x t TM t tE E e x z γ θ θ τ θ θ − + = − r 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum69 ( )ii xz i e E yH θθγ η sincos 1 0 1ˆ +− = r ( ) { }1 cos sin 0 ˆ ˆcos sinr rz x r TM r iE E e x z γ θ θ θ θ− − + = Γ + r ( )1 cos sin0 1 ˆ ˆ r rz xTM r E H y ye γ θ θ η − − +Γ = − r ( )2 cos sin0 2 ˆ t tz xTM t E H y e γ θ θτ η − + = r
  • 70. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence Equating the tangential components of magnetic field (magnetic field has only Hy component and it is tangential at the interface z=0) and electric field (electric field has two components: Ex and Ez and only Ex is 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum70 (electric field has two components: Ex and Ez and only Ex is tangential at the interface z=0) at z=0 gives 1 21sin sinsin cos cos cosi trx xx i TM r TM te e eγ θ γ θγ θ θ θ τ θ− −− + Γ = 21 1 sinsin sin 1 1 2 ti r xx x TM TMe ee γ θγ θ γ θ τ η η η −− − Γ − =
  • 71. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence Therefore, which is Snell’s law of reflection and refraction and this tri θγθγθγ sinsinsin 211 == 1 2; sin sini r i tθ θ γ θ γ θ⇒ = = 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum71 which is Snell’s law of reflection and refraction and this implies that cos cos cosi TM r TM tθ θ τ θ+ Γ = ( ) 1 2 1 1 TM TM τ η η − Γ =
  • 72. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence The above two equations has two unknowns τTM and ГTM and it can be easily solved as follows Therefore, cos cos cos i TM r TM t θ θ τ θ + Γ = ( )2 1 1TM TM η τ η = − Γ 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum72 Therefore, ( ) ( )2 2 1 1 2 1 1 22 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 cos cos cos cos 1 1 cos cos cos cos cos cos cos coscos cos cos cos cos cos cos cos i TM r i TM r TM TM t t t i t r i tr TM TM t t t t t i TM θ θ θη η θ θ η η θ θ θ η θ η θ η θ η θη θ η η θ θ η η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ +Γ Γ = −Γ ⇒ −Γ = +        − − − ⇒ Γ − − = − ⇒ Γ =                − ⇒ Γ = 2 1 1 2 1 cos cos cos cos cos t i t r t i η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ − = + +
  • 73. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence Hence, the reflection and transmission coefficients for oblique ( ) 2 1 2 1 2 12 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 22 1 2 1 2 1 cos cos cos cos cos cos 1 1 cos cos cos cos 2 cos 2 cos cos cos cos cos t i t i t i TM TM t i t i i i t i t i η θ η θ η θ η θ η θ η θη η η τ η η η θ η θ η η θ η θ η θ η θη η η θ η θ η θ η θ    − + − + ∴ = −Γ = − =    + +      = =  + +  3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum73 Hence, the reflection and transmission coefficients for oblique incidence (Fresnel coefficients) for parallel polarization are given as follows: Note that cosine terms multiplication in the above equations is different from the previous expression forTE waves 2 1 2 1 cos cos cos cos t i TM t i η θ η θ η θ η θ − ∴Γ = + 2 2 1 2 cos cos cos i TM t i η θ τ η θ η θ = +
  • 74. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence 6.3.3 Brewster angle: For Γ=0, the angle of incidence is known as Brewster angle (θB) This means at this angle of incidence of the EM wave from region I, 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum74 region I, there will be no reflection from region II, all the EM waves will be absorbed
  • 75. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence For parallel polarization, 2 1 2 1 cos cos 0 cos cos t i TM t i η θ η θ η θ η θ − Γ = = + TM i Bθ θ= 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum75 Also we have from 2nd Snell’s law 2 1cos cos TM t Bη θ η θ⇒ = t TM B θγθγ sinsin 21 =
  • 76. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence Using the above two equations, we can get (see textbook)           − = 22 2 2 2 1 2 1 sin γη η η θTM B 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum76 For lossless media, we have, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 2 2 1 21 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 ; sin TM B µ ε µ γ µ µ ε µ ε µ εη γ ε µ θ µ ε µ εη γ µ µ ε µ ε µ γ ε µ ε µ ε µ − = = = = ∴ = − Q         − 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 γ γ η ηB
  • 77. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence For magnetic media, is of the form 1/0 and Brewster angle does not exist 21 εε = TM Bθ2 sin 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum77 exist But, for dielectric media, it exist and can be calculated as follows 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 sin tanTM TM B B n n ε ε ε ε θ θ ε ε ε ε ε ε ε − ⇒ = = ⇒ = = +−
  • 78. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence For perpendicular polarization, Similarly, Brewster’s angle doesn’t exist for perpendicular polarization at oblique incidence for a non-magnetic or dielectric medium (see textbook for derivation) For magnetic medium 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum78 For magnetic medium ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 2 1 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 11 2 sin sin ;tanTE TE TE B B B n n µ µ µ µ µ µ θ θ θ µ µ µ µ µµ µ − ∴ = = ⇒ = = = + +−
  • 79. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence Brewster angle exist for oblique incidence (perpendicular polarization) for interface between two magnetic media An incident wave consisting of both polarizations will have reflected wave for only one polarization for Brewster angle Brewster angle is also known as Polarizing angle (used in optics and lasers) 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum79 Polarizing angle optics and lasers) In other words, an incident wave which is composed of both TE andTM waves will have reflectedTE (TM) waves only for dielectric (magnetic) media interface Thus, a circularly polarized incident wave at polarizing angle will become a linearly polarized wave
  • 80. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence 6.3.4Total internal reflection: Used in optical fibers Light strikes an angle of incidence greater than critical angle, all of the light energy will be reflected back, and none of them will be absorbed 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum80 none of them will be absorbed This critical angle is related to the refractive index of the two media and is given by where are the refractive index of medium 2 and 1 respectively 1 2 1 sinc n n θ −   =    
  • 81. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence In fact, this can be observed for both the polarizations we have discussed above From Snell’s Second law, we have, 2 1 2 sin sin sin sin t i t i γ θ γ θ γ θ θ γ = ⇒ = 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum81 If we consider non-magnetic materials (dielectrics) of , in that case, 1 2 1 sin sin sini t iγ θ γ θ θ γ = ⇒ = 2 1 sin sin t i ε θ θ ε ⇒ =
  • 82. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence Hence, for (it means the transmitted wave travels along the interface, for our case, it is x-axis) which implies that , 2 i c t π θ θ θ= = 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum82 our case, it is x-axis) which implies that 2 1 2 11 sin sinc c ε ε θ θ εε −   ⇒ = ⇒ =     
  • 83. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence We can write the above relation as Note that to have a real value of critical angle 1 1 1 10 2 0 22 2 2 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 sin sin sin sinr r r r c r r r r n n µ µ ε εε µ ε θ ε µ µ ε ε µ ε − − − −        = = = =                 ε ε> 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum83 Note that to have a real value of critical angle Besides, we have assumed that for a dielectric, 1 2ε ε> 1 2 1r rµ µ= =
  • 84. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence What will happen when the angle of incidence is greater than the critical angle? For all angles greater than the critical angle, using Snell’s second law, and noting that waves are moving from a denser to a rarer dielectric medium, 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum84 medium, The value of should be imaginary 1 1 2 2 2 sin sin 1 cos 1 sini i c t t t µ ε θ θ θ θ θ θ µ ε > ∴ = > ⇒ = ± −Q cos tθ 1 2 1r rµ µ= = 1 2ε ε>
  • 85. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence It can be shown that (see textbook for derivation) For z>0, since is an imaginary number, is also purely imaginary 2 2 2 2 0 02 cos 2 cos* * 2 2 ˆ ˆsin cost tj z j z t t E E S E H x e z eβ θ β θτ τ θ θ η η − − ∴ = × = + r r r cos tθ * cos tθ 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum85 also purely imaginary Hence, the second term is imaginary, therefore, no real power is flowing along z-axis in region II The first term which has direction along x-axis is real and is exponentially decaying with z
  • 86. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence Hence, When a wave is incident at an angle of incidence greater than or equal to the critical angle from region I, the wave will be total internally reflected in region I Surface waves exist in the region II, 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum86 Surface waves exist in the region II, which is propagating along x-axis (direction of power flow), and attenuating very fast along z-axis People have used this for communications using submarines
  • 87. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence 6.3.5 Effects on polarization: Since any arbitrary wave incident obliquely from region I can be decomposed into linear combinations of TE andTM waves and we also know that the expressions for reflection and 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum87 we also know that the expressions for reflection and transmission coefficients for parallel and perpendicular polarizations are different 2 1 2 1 cos cos ; cos cos i t TE i t η θ η θ η θ η θ − Γ = + 2 1 2 1 cos cos cos cos t i TM t i η θ η θ η θ η θ − Γ = +
  • 88. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence So, any circularly polarized incident wave will become elliptically polarized after reflection or transmission Similarly, a linearly polarized wave (note that linear polarization could be expressed as linear combination of RHCP and LHCP) may be 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum88 RHCP and LHCP) may be rotated after reflection
  • 89. 6.3 Plane wave reflection from media interface at oblique incidence For instance, If the region II is a perfect conductor, η2=0, Г=-1 for both TE andTM cases, this means a RHCP wave after reflection will become LHCP 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum89 this means a RHCP wave after reflection will become LHCP wave and vice versa This is why circular polarization is not used for indoor communication systems since we have many reflections inside a room
  • 90. 6.4 Summary Plane waves reflection from a media interface Normal incidence TE Lossless Oblique incidence Lossy conducting medium Perfect conductor TM Brewster angle Effect on polarization 2 1 2 1 ; η η η η − Γ = + 2 1 2 2η τ η η = + τ→0 and Γ→-1 2 1 2 1 cos cos cos cos i t TE i t η θ η θ η θ η θ − Γ = + 2 2 1 2 cos cos cos i TE i t η θ τ η θ η θ = + cos cosη θ η θ− CP EP 3/25/2014Electromagnetic FieldTheory by R. S. Kshetrimayum90 Lossless medium Good conductor Fig. 6.7 Plane waves reflection from media interface in a nutshell angle Total internal reflection ( ) 2 21 1 0 1 1 1 1 ˆRe 2 2 avgS S z E η − Γ = • = r 1 2 avg avgS S= 2 1 2 1 cos cos cos cos t i TM t i η θ η θ η θ η θ − ∴Γ = + 2 2 1 2 cos cos cos i TM t i η θ τ η θ η θ = + CP EP         = − 1 21 sin ε ε θc 1 2 1 2 tan n nTM B == ε ε θ 1 2 1 2 tan n nTE B == µ µ θ 1 1 2 2 2 sin sin 1 cos 1 sini i c t t t µ ε θ θ θ θ θ θ µ ε > ∴ = > ⇒ = ± −Q( ) z avg eEzSS α η 2 2 2 2 0 2 1 2 1 ˆRe 2 1 −+ Γ− =•= r