SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 110
Cervical spine injuries
Dr. Sairamakrishnan S
• Upper cervical injuries – C1,C2
• Lower cervical injuries – C3 to C7
Upper Cervical Injuries
Demographics
• Common in children and in people >60 years
• Paediatric
• MVA in 38% of cases
• 1 to 9% of all spine injuries.
• 56 to 73% of cervical spine injuries.
• 53% with head injuries (41% mortality)
• Age >60 years
• Occurs from minor trauma
• osteoporosis/osteopenia
• spondylosis of the lower cervical spine
• 69.8% of all cervical spine trauma
• 57% are odontoid fractures
• Lower rate of neurologic injury (26% to 28% mortality)
Anatomy of the Upper Cervical Spine
• Three-unit joint - bones of the occiput, atlas, and axis, their synovial
articulations, and the associated ligamentous structures.
• Six synovial joints – 2 x occipitoatlantal joints, anterior and posterior
median atlantoodontoid joints, 2 x atlantoaxial joints
• Occiput-C1 articulation supplies approximately 50% of total cervical
flexion and extension.
• C1-C2 articulations supply 50% of total cervical rotation.
• The ligamentous restraints provide the necessary stability to prevent
injury to the enclosed brainstem and spinal cord
• Anterior longitudinal ligament
• Cruciform ligament
• Tectorial membrane (extension of the posterior longitudinal
ligament)
• Nuchal ligament
• Atlanto-odontoid ligament
• Apical ligament
• Alar ligaments
Clinical Evaluation
• Cervical spine injury has been closely linked to
• severe head injury
• high-energy mechanism
• focal neurologic deficit
• Adequate airway and ventilation must be established - Nasotracheal
intubation or cricothyroidotomy is safest.
• initial stabilization – rigid cervical collar, spine board, sandbags.
• noncontiguous spinal injuries - 6%
• 24% overall incidence of vertebral artery injury - fatal ischemic
damage
• Neurologic evaluation – difficult
• occipitocervical junction – incomplete cord injury –
compression/injury of the pyramidal decussation – mimics central
cord syndrome
• Lower cranial nerves – CN IX, X, XI, XII
Imaging
• Plain radiography
• Anteroposterior
• Lateral
• Open-mouth view
• Flexion and extension views – 33% voluntary gaurding
• Computed tomography (CT)
• Most sensitive modality
• Sensitivity of 84%
• Cost effective as a primary screening tool
• Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
• Poor sensitivity for detecting fractures
• Gold standard for detecting neurological injuries and to detect
hematomas.
Occipital Condyle Fractures
• High energy trauma to the head and neck
• Complaints of
• High cervical pain
• Torticollis
• Headaches
• Impaired mobility
• Extremely difficult to detect with conventional radiography.
• CT with reconstruction is the imaging modality of choice.
• Anderson and Montesano classification
• Type 1
• impaction fractures of the condyle from axial loading
• If unilateral – stable
• Type 2
• part of a more extensive basioccipital fracture that
involves one or both occipital condyles.
• Usually stable
• Type 3
• avulsion fractures near the alar ligament insertion that
result in medial displacement of the condylar fracture
fragment
• Usually unstable
• Management
• Patients with occipitocervical misalignment only should be treated in a
halo vest or with a posterior fusion.
• Rest all patients can be treated with rigid cervical collar.
Maserati MB, Stephens B, Zohny Z, et al: Occipital condyle fractures: clinical decision rule and
surgical management. J Neurosurg Spine 11:388-395, 2009.
Atlanto-Occipital Injuries
• Children younger than 12 years of age are uniquely predisposed to
this injury because their occipitoatlantal joints are flatter and because
their head weight–to–body weight ratio is significantly greater than in
adults.
• Account for 19% to 35% of all deaths from cervical spine trauma.
• Significant retropharyngeal soft tissue swelling at C3 will be seen.
• Flexion-extension views are not recommended.
• Powers’ ratio, the ratio of the
distance from the basion to the
posterior arch of the atlas divided
by the distance from the
opisthion to the anterior arch of
the atlas, should be 1.0 or less in
the absence of anterior
occipitoatlantal dislocation
• The distance between the basion
and the posterior axial line (the
basion-axial interval) is greater
than 12 mm then occipitocervical
instability is present.
• Traynelis classification
• All occipitocervical dislocations should be treated initially by
immediate application of a halo vest.
• Because the majority of these injuries are unstable, posterior
occipitocervical fusion is the procedure of choice
Eismont FJ, Bohlman HH: Posterior atlanto-occipital dislocation with fractures of the atlas and
odontoid process. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:397-399, 1978.
Montane I, Eismont FJ, Green BA: Traumatic occipitoatlantal dislocation. Spine 16:112-116, 1991.
Fractures of the Atlas
• First described by Jefferson in 1921.
• 2% to 13% of all cervical spine fractures.
• 25% of all injuries to the atlantoaxial complex.
• Seen in the younger age groups (mean age, 30 years).
• Caused by axial loading.
• Fractures usually occur in the anterior and posterior arches.
• Neurologic injury is uncommon in the case of isolated fractures of the
atlas.
• Jefferson classification
• Type 1 – Posterior arch fracture
• Type 2 – Anterior arch fracture
• Type 3 – Burst fracture
• Type 4 – Lateral mass fracture
• Stable fractures that can be treated in a cervical collar
• Lateral mass nondisplaced injuries can be treated with a cervical
collar.
• Lateral mass injuries that are displaced more than 5 mm can be
treated with immediate halo vest application.
• Burst fractures < 7mm displacement are treated with cervical collar
• Burst fractures > 7mm displacement are treated with a halo vest for 3
months. Post removal if significant C1-C2 instability then C1-C2
fusion.
• Traction reduction followed by early C1-C2 fusion using C1-C2
transarticular screws has also been described.
• Intraoperative difficulty may be found owing to gross instability of the
C1 lateral masses and the loose C1 posterior arch.
McGuire RA Jr, Harkey HL: Primary treatment of unstable Jefferson’s fractures. J Spinal Disord 8:233-
236, 1995.
Atlantoaxial Subluxation and Dislocation
• Patients present with a “cock robin” appearance with the head tilted
toward and rotated away from the side of the dislocation.
• Radiographs will show asymmetry of the lateral masses on the open-
mouth view.
• Dynamic CT with head rotations is ideal.
Fielding and hawkins classification
• Type 1 – Rotatory subluxation without anterior shift
• Type 2 – Rotatory displacement with anterior displacement 3-5 mm
• Type 3 – Rotatory displacement with anterior displacement >5 mm
• Type 4 – Rotatory displacement with posterior displacement
• Closed reduction with skull thongs and cervical collar application is
done.
• If reduction was difficult to achieve then halo application is done.
• If closed reduction fails then open reduction with C1 C2 fusion is
done.
Fractures of the Odontoid
• Fractures of the dens constitute 7% to 13% of all cervical spine
injuries.
• Hyperflexion results in anterior displacement of the dens fracture,
and hyperextension results in posterior displacement of the dens
fracture.
• The fracture can usually be seen on open-mouth and lateral
radiographs of the cervical spine, although nondisplaced fractures can
easily be missed.
• Anderson classification
• Type 1 - avulsion injuries at the tip of the dens.
• Type 2 - through the base of the dens.
• Type 3 - extend into the body of the axis.
• Type 1 injuries can be treated nonoperatively with a rigid cervical
collar. After 3 months of immobilization, flexion and extension
radiographs are taken.
• Type II odontoid fracture is the most problematic type of odontoid
fracture. High chance of non-union (33%).
• There is an increased nonunion rate associated with fractures with
greater than 5 mm of displacement, angulation greater than 10
degrees, age older than 40 years, and posterior displacement.
• Halo vest treatment may be a good option for a patient with an
undisplaced type II odontoid fracture or an undisplaced/minimally
displaced type III odontoid fracture.
• In patients with high risk for non union (old age, smoking) primary
C1C2 fusion can be done which increases the union rate to 96%.
• Primary fixation of Dens is ideal in transverse, noncomminuted, and
reducible fractures and preserves cervical rotation.
• Primary fixation of dens is associated with higher complications and
non-union in elderly (13-17%)
• Jeanneret et al in their study said that improvement in rotational
movements with primary fixation of dens is insignificant.
Jeanneret B, Vernet O, Frei S, Magerl F: Atlantoaxial mobility after screw fixation of the odontoid: A
computed tomographic study. J Spinal Disord 4:203-211, 1991.
Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of the Axis
(Hangman’s franture)
• The fracture line passes through the neural arch of the axis.
• Combinations of extension, flexion, distraction, and axial loading of
the cervical spine.
• Modified effendi classification
• Type 1 - occur through the pars interarticularis bilaterally with less than
3 mm translation and no angulation.
• Type 2 - bipedicular fractures with greater than 3 mm of displacement.
• Type 2A - angulation >11* but has minimal translation.
• Type 3 - associated with unilateral or bilateral facet dislocations.
• In type 1 fractures the disc and ligaments are intact.
• In type 2 fractures there is disruption of the C2C3 disc with
compression fracture of the anterosuperior corner of C3 or the
posteroinferior body of C2.
• In type 2a fractures there is significant disruption of the disc and
posterior longitudinal ligament. Associated with a 33% incidence of
neurologic deficit.
• Type 3 has disruption of the posterior longitudinal ligament and the
C2-C3 intervertebral disc occurs in these injuries. These injuries are
commonly associated with neurologic injuries.
• Type III injuries occur in three basic patterns:
• bilateral neural arch fractures anterior to the facet joints with bilateral
facet dislocations posterior to it
• a rotational injury with fracture of the neural arch on one side
anterior to the facet joint and on the second side in the area of the
facet joint causing a unilateral facet dislocation
• a bilateral facet dislocation with fractures of the neural arch just
posterior to the facet joints.
• Isolated type I fractures can be treated in a rigid cervical collar for 8 to
12 weeks.
• Type II fractures are treated with initial traction in extension followed
by immobilization in a halo vest.
• Type IIa fractures are treated with immediate application of a halo
vest. Traction is avoided in patients with type IIa injuries because
even minimal traction can cause severe overdistraction.
• All type III fractures should be treated with surgical reduction and
posterior C2-C3 fusion.
Injuries of the Lower Cervical
Spine
Anatomy
• The subaxial cervical spine is highly mobile but protective of its soft
tissue contents, namely the spinal cord, nerve roots, and vertebral
arteries.
• Each vertebra from C3 to 7 is progressively larger and is connected
both above and below by three articulations, the disc complex and
the paired lateral pillars.
• These form three columns that are essential for the weight-bearing
function of the spine.
• The anterior column is connected to each lateral pillar by pedicles,
and the lateral pillars are connected by the lamina.
• The large spinous processes are levers for attachment of the
paraspinal muscles and ligaments.
• Posterior ligamentous complex is essential to maintaining stability
against flexion and anterior shear forces.
Bony anatomy
• Vertebral bodies are relatively large weight-bearing cuboid structures
that are connected to each other by the intervertebral disc.
• The uncus is responsible for resistance to lateral bending, lateral
listhesis, and rotation.
• Short transverse processes extend lateral from the body about
midlevel in anteroposterior direction and are confluent with vestigial
ribs forming the foramen transversarium.
• Within this structure lies the vertebral artery and venous plexus
except at C7, which is void.
• Pedicles extend posteriorly and outward from the cranial aspect of
the posterior wall of the body to the lateral masses.
• Because of the close proximity of the vertebral arteries, pedicle screw
is often considered dangerous and supplanted by the use of the
lateral masses as screw anchorage.
• The lateral masses or pillars when viewed laterally are parallelogram
in shape and appear square when viewed ventrally or dorsally.
• Superior and inferior articular facets have cartilage surfaces that form
the facet articulations.
• The superior facet is located behind the neuroforamen and, when
fractured, may cause root injury.
• The laminae are thin plates of bone that extend from the lateral mass
obliquely posterior and meet each other at the base of the spinous
process.
• The spinous processes project posteriorly, angling downward, and are
progressively larger from cranial to caudal direction.
• The spinous process of C3 to C5 is always bifid, whereas C6 may be
and C7 is never bifid.
Ligamentous Anatomy
• The ligaments of the cervical spine are essential to maintain both
stability and range of motion.
• The anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments lie on the respective
surfaces of the vertebral body.
• The annulus joins the corresponding vertebral bodies and is the
primary restraint to all directions of movements.
• The posterior ligamentous complex consists of the nuchal ligaments,
ligamentum flava, facet joint capsules, and all bony attachments.
• The nuchal ligaments include the ligamentum nuchae, which is a thick
band strongly attached to the spinous processes of C2 and C7.
• The ligamentum nuchae blends with the supraspinous ligament,
which bands together each spinous process at their tips.
• Between the spinous processes are the interspinous ligaments.
• The ligamentum flava attaches to the underside of the cranial lamina
and top-most aspect of the caudal vertebrae.
• Each facet articulation has relatively redundant facet capsules that
offer only a small amount of stability
Neurovascular Anatomy
• The spinal cord is an elastic structure that lies inside the spinal canal.
• In adults its anteroposterior diameter measures about 8 mm and
cross-section is slightly oval.
• At each disc level ventral and dorsal roots sprout and join laterally,
forming the spinal nerve in the neuroforamina.
• Neuroforamina are bordered anteriorly by the posterior lateral corner
of the disc and uncus, above and below by pedicles and posteriorly by
the superior articular facet and lateral mass.
• The vertebral artery ascends from the subclavian artery to pass within
the foramen transversarium at C6, although in 1% of cases this can
occur aberrantly at C7 or higher levels.
• It exits the foramen transversarium of C2 turning anteriorly and
medially in C2 and then again laterally into C1.
Kinematics
• Kinematically each segment of the subaxial spine normally has
approximately 11, 5, and 5 degrees of movement in flexion-extension,
lateral bending, and rotation.
• Small amounts (1 to 2 mm) of translation occur in both anterior-
posterior and lateral directions.
Classification
• Cervical Spine Injury Severity Score
• The Cervical Spine Injury Severity Score (CSISS) is based on
independent analysis of four columns
• The anterior column includes the body, disc including the annulus,
anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments, and transverse
processes.
• Each lateral column is scored separately and includes the facet
projections, lateral mass, pedicles, and facet joint capsules.
• The posterior column includes the lamina, spinous process,
ligamentum flavum, and nuchal ligaments.
• Each column is scored using a 0-5 analog scale.
• Fractional scores can be used.
• Scores increase proportional to either displacement of fracture
fragments or separation as a result of soft tissue injury.
• For example, a nondisplaced fracture is scored 1 while the worst
injury possible for that column is a 5.
• Each column is scored independently and summed, giving the CSISS
ranging 0-20.
• Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification
• Evaluates fracture morphology, the discoligamentous complex, and
neurologic function, creating a comprehensive system to aid
treatment decision making.
• The system assigns points for each domain and if the score
exceeds a threshold, surgery would be indicated.
• Morphology
• Compression injuries are assigned one point, with an additional
point being assigned for burst fractures or when greater than 10
degrees of scoliosis is created by lateral compression injuries.
• Distraction injuries have a poor prognosis, and are therefore
assigned three points.
• Rotation and translational injuries such as from facet dislocations
are given four points.
• Discoligamentous Complex
• Anteriorly these include the disc annulus complex and the
anterior/posterior longitudinal ligaments.
• Posteriorly these include the nuchal ligaments as well as the
ligamentum flavum and facet capsules.
• The discoligamentous complex is scored 0 for intact, 1 for
indeterminate, and 2 for disrupted.
• Neurologic Function
• Root injuries have a good prognosis and are scored 1.
• Complete cord injuries are given 2 points.
• Three points are assigned for incomplete, which is a higher score
than for complete because incomplete injuries are more likely to
benefit from surgery.
• Finally, an additional point is added when residual neural tissue
compression is present in patients with neurologic deficits.
• A patient with an SLIC score equal to 3 is treated nonoperatively,
whereas surgery is recommended in a patient with a score equal to 5.
• Scores of 4 can be treated either operatively or nonoperatively.
Anterior Compression Fractures
• Anterior compression fractures, like burst fractures, occur from
hyperflexion and/or axial loading forces.
• During this loading, the disc is pressurized, resulting in failure of the
endplate and creating wedging of the vertebral body.
• . This usually occurs along the superior endplate.
• During hyperflexion the posterior ligaments may be strained beyond
physiologic limits, causing disruption. This injury pattern has been
termed “hidden flexion injury” and often fails nonoperative
treatment.
Burst Fractures
• Caused by rapid increase in intradiscal pressure resulting in failure of
the superior endplate, which is driven along with the disc into the
vertebral body.
• The rapid increased intravertebral pressure creates hoop stresses and
eventual failure of the body with radial displacement of bone
fragments.
• In addition, the pedicles are pushed outward causing posterior
fractures.
• Often flexion is present, causing posterior ligamentous complex
disruption and/or facet subluxation, fracture, or dislocation.
Flexion Axial Loading Injury
• Also called tear drop fractures, are devastating injuries due to the
propensity for neurologic injury and often are the result of diving or
other sports-related activities.
• The injury occurs from a compression force obliquely applied in a
downward and posterior direction.
• Forces are concentrated in the anterior inferior corner of the
vertebral body, which is sheared off, giving the injury its name.
• The remaining part of the vertebral body shears through the disc
space and rotates posteriorly into the spinal canal, crushing the spinal
cord.
Transverse Process Fractures
• Transverse process fractures are quite common, occurring in isolation
or in association with other more severe injuries.
• These fractures are not involved with spinal stability and therefore are
not significant in treatment decision making for the spine.
• However, transverse process fractures at C6 and above may warn of
possible vertebral artery injury.
Disc-Distraction Injury
• Impacting the head or face in a fall or forward striking a windshield
creates hyperextension, compression, and posterior shear.
• The anterior longitudinal ligament and disc annulus can fail from
tension.
• Excessive compressive loading of the lateral masses and impaction of
the spinous process may cause fracture.
• The disc distraction injury occurs often in spondylotic spines.
• The forced hyperextension with compression can transiently narrow
the spinal canal, causing spinal cord injury, typical of the central cord
type.
Treatment of Anterior Column Injuries
• Anterior column injuries with low SLIC or CSISS scores can be treated
non-operatively.
• Less significant injuries can be treated with a cervical collar, while
burst fractures and flexion/axial loading injuries can be treated with a
cervical thoracic orthosis (CTO) or halo vest.
• Surgical indications for anterior column injuries are those with
evidence of disruption of the posterior ligamentous complex as
demonstrated by high CSISS and SLIC scores.
• Although both anterior and posterior approaches may be used, it is
recommend addressing pathology at its major location (anteriorly).
• After strut grafting or insertion of a cage, an anterior plate is applied.
• Surgical indications for disc distraction injuries are cases with any
significant displacement, ongoing neurologic symptoms, or chronic
pain.
• Anterior discectomy and fusion are indicated in neurologically intact
patients and those with radiculopathy or those with cord injury
limited to injured level.
• If multilevel stenosis options available are single-level anterior
cervical discectomy and fusion combined with posterior
decompression or posterior decompression with posterior fusion.
Spinous Process and Lamina Fractures
• Occur from impaction forces as a result of compression during forced
hyperextension.
• Paraspinal muscle contractions can also result in spinous process
fractures termed clay shoveler’s fracture.
Posterior Ligamentous Injury without
Subluxation
• Posterior ligamentous disruptions occur from hyperflexion and are
worsened with any rotation.
• Posterior ligamentous injuries without subluxation are suspected
when interspinous process spreading is present but without vertebral
or facet subluxation.
Treatment of Posterior Column Injuries
• Management of isolated spinous process and lamina fractures is with
simple collar immobilization.
• Because they may be associated with complete posterior ligamentous
complex disruption, kyphosis or progressive subluxation may occur.
• Spinous process fractures may not heal due to the displacement from
muscle contractions, although this rarely leads to chronic pain or
further surgical treatment.
• Isolated posterior ligamentous injuries without subluxation have a
worse prognosis.
• Initial management of these injuries unless there is MRI evidence of
complete disruption is nonoperative in a collar or CTO. The latter is
preferred at the lower cervical spine (C5-C7).
• If upright radiographs demonstrate increasing deformity or excessive
motion after 8 to 10 weeks of immobilization, surgery is
recommended.
• Patients with complete ligamentous disruption can be taken for
posterior surgery.
Isolated Facet Fractures
• Isolated facet fractures occur from forced impaction against the
neighboring facet, usually with a component of anterior shear.
• Should always be evaluated with the suspicion that greater instability
is present.
• Plain radiographs may miss these injuries unless subluxation is
present.
• CT is sensitive for these injuries, and they are best evaluated on
sagittal reconstructions.
Lateral Mass Fractures
• Lateral mass fractures most commonly result from lateral
compression or hyperextension where facets impact each other.
• Transiently this may narrow the neuroforamina with resultant root
injury.
• Kotani classification
• Type I is a fracture separation.
There is an ipsilateral pedicle
and lamina fracture.
• . Type II lateral mass fractures
are highly comminuted.
• Type III is a vertical fracture in
the coronal plane with
invagination of the superior
facet into the cranial lateral
mass.
• Type IV fractures are traumatic
spondylolisthesis, which usually
occurs at C7 or T1.
Unilateral Facet Dislocations
• Head rotation or rotation associated with flexion cause forward and
upward translation of the opposite facet, which when severe causes
unilateral facet dislocation and in many cases facet fracture as well.
• There is associated injury to the intervertebral disc and ligamentum
flava.
• CT will show that the inferior facet of the rostral vertebra is anterior
to the superior facet of the caudal vertebra.
Bilateral Facet Dislocation
• Bilateral facet dislocations are devastating injuries frequently
resulting in quadriplegia.
• Bilateral facet dislocations occur from hyperflexion with or without
rotation.
• There will always be associated disruption of the posterior
ligamentous complex.
• Fractures of the facets, lamina, and spinous processes are common.
• Posterior interspinous widening is usually present.
• The disc may be inappropriately narrowed, suggesting posterior
herniation.
• The spinal canal is significantly narrowed
Treatment of Lateral Column Injuries
• Isolated facet fractures can be treated nonoperatively with a collar or
CTO – should look for increasing kyphosis.
• Type I lateral mass fractures with minimal anterior translation can be
treated nonoperatively with a CTO or preferably a halo vest.
• Those having subluxation should be treated surgically.
• An important surgical consideration is that lateral mass separations
involve two motion segments.
• Fusion at only one of these levels may be associated with late
subluxation at the other level.
• The preferred treatment is posterior lateral mass fixation at two
motion segments.
• Anterior fusion at both segments is an alternative option.
• Type II comminuted lateral mass fractures are treated similarly
• Type III can be treated with an orthosis unless significant
displacement is present.
• Type IV traumatic spondylolisthesis is difficult to reduce and often
comminuted.
• Open reduction is usually required and is best performed posteriorly.
Special Injury Types
• ankylosed spines
• central cord syndrome
• vertical distraction injuries
• fractures in the elderly
Ankylosed Spines
• Ankylosing spondylitis, diffuse idiopathic spinal hyperostosis
• Increased risk of spinal column and cord injury.
• The loss of intervertebral disc decreases elastic deformation following
trauma further amplified by long lever arms.
• Spine may be may be osteoporotic and have potential for epidural
bleeding.
• The anterior column fails in tension and compressive forces are then
created posteriorly, resulting in fractures of the spinous processes and
lamina.
• The treatment of subaxial fractures in patients with ankylosing
spondylitis is surgical unless medically contraindicated.
• The aggressive approach is warranted by the high incidence of
displacement and resultant neurologic injury or kyphosis that can
occur with nonoperative treatment.
• The surgical treatment is best performed with posterior
instrumentation over many segments because there is no concern
over fusing many segments.
• Bone graft is not necessary, although local bone graft can be added at
the fracture site.
Central Cord Syndrome
• Occurs from a hyperextension injury in patients with narrow spinal
canals, usually from spondylosis.
• This causes infolding of the ligamentum flavum and bulging of the
disc creating a pincer to the spinal cord.
• Radiographically no significant injuries are noted.
• Neurologic examination is a picture of greater involvement of the
upper extremities than the lower extremity and sacral roots.
• Neurologic manifestations reflect injury to the central gray matter and
surrounding white matter in the central spinal cord.
• The axonal tracts to the upper extremities are located more centrally
than the lower extremity and sacral regions and therefore are injured
to a greater degree leading to the classic pattern of neurologic
findings.
• The overall prognosis for this injury is good, although hand function
may remain poor.
• Aggressive surgical approach is advocated with the goals to speed
recovery, shorten hospitalization, and reduce morbidity
Vertical Distraction Injury
• This is a rare devastating injury where there is vertical separation
between the vertebral segments through the disc space and facet
articulations.
• Complete spinal cord injury is always present and vascular
abnormities should be anticipated.
• Occur from rapid head deceleration or from hanging.
• Excessive tensile forces result in disruption of all ligamentous
constraints and are only limited by elasticity of the neurovascular
elements.
• Traction is contraindicated and reduction is best achieved either
surgically or by halo vest.
• Definitive treatment by combined anteroposterior fixation is
recommended.
Fractures in Geriatric Patients
• Elderly patients are more prone to injury due to osteoporosis,
generalized sensory imbalance with aging, developmental stenosis
with increased risk of spinal cord injury, and a higher rate of vehicular
accidents per mile driven.
• Mortality of geriatric patients with cervical fractures ranges 30% to
50%.
• Treatment by traction, prolonged bed rest, and the halo vest are
associated with increased mortality and should be avoided.
• Geriatric patients are particularly prone to aspiration pneumonia due
to retropharyngeal soft tissue swelling and dysphagia.
• If medical conditions allow, rigid stabilization should be considered for
any marginal or unstable injury.
• Posterior fusions are preffered in order to avoid anterior approaches
and the consequent risk of airway or swallowing complications.
Cervical spine injuries.pptx

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Evaluation of Spinal alignment
Evaluation of Spinal alignmentEvaluation of Spinal alignment
Evaluation of Spinal alignmentTejasvi Agarwal
 
Thoracolumbar fractures
Thoracolumbar fracturesThoracolumbar fractures
Thoracolumbar fracturesRishit Soni
 
Pedicle Screws Fixation of Thoraco-Lumbar Spine
Pedicle Screws Fixation of Thoraco-Lumbar SpinePedicle Screws Fixation of Thoraco-Lumbar Spine
Pedicle Screws Fixation of Thoraco-Lumbar SpineBenthungo Tungoe
 
Current Concepts in Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures
Current Concepts in Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures Current Concepts in Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures
Current Concepts in Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures washingtonortho
 
Hip Reduction Techniques
Hip Reduction TechniquesHip Reduction Techniques
Hip Reduction TechniquesSCGH ED CME
 
Thoracolumbar fracture for mbbs
Thoracolumbar fracture for mbbsThoracolumbar fracture for mbbs
Thoracolumbar fracture for mbbsDr Mizan
 
Cervical trauma
Cervical traumaCervical trauma
Cervical traumaAli Jiwani
 
Thoraco Lumbar Spine Injury
Thoraco Lumbar Spine InjuryThoraco Lumbar Spine Injury
Thoraco Lumbar Spine InjuryKevin Ambadan
 
Bajammal 2006 Upper Cervical Trauma
Bajammal 2006 Upper Cervical TraumaBajammal 2006 Upper Cervical Trauma
Bajammal 2006 Upper Cervical TraumaSohail Bajammal
 
Proximal humerus fractures
Proximal humerus fracturesProximal humerus fractures
Proximal humerus fracturesPonnilavan Ponz
 
Proximal humerus fractures
Proximal humerus fracturesProximal humerus fractures
Proximal humerus fracturesorthoprince
 
Injuries at occipitocervical junction
Injuries at occipitocervical junction Injuries at occipitocervical junction
Injuries at occipitocervical junction Vijay Loya
 
Applied surgical anatomy of the craniovertebral spine
Applied surgical anatomy of the craniovertebral spineApplied surgical anatomy of the craniovertebral spine
Applied surgical anatomy of the craniovertebral spineKshitij Chaudhary
 
Technique transpedincular screw placement
Technique transpedincular screw placementTechnique transpedincular screw placement
Technique transpedincular screw placementRamis Huseynov
 

Mais procurados (20)

Evaluation of Spinal alignment
Evaluation of Spinal alignmentEvaluation of Spinal alignment
Evaluation of Spinal alignment
 
Thoracolumbar fractures
Thoracolumbar fracturesThoracolumbar fractures
Thoracolumbar fractures
 
Pedicle Screws Fixation of Thoraco-Lumbar Spine
Pedicle Screws Fixation of Thoraco-Lumbar SpinePedicle Screws Fixation of Thoraco-Lumbar Spine
Pedicle Screws Fixation of Thoraco-Lumbar Spine
 
Current Concepts in Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures
Current Concepts in Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures Current Concepts in Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures
Current Concepts in Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures
 
Hip Reduction Techniques
Hip Reduction TechniquesHip Reduction Techniques
Hip Reduction Techniques
 
C1 C2 fractures
C1 C2 fracturesC1 C2 fractures
C1 C2 fractures
 
Thoracolumbar fracture for mbbs
Thoracolumbar fracture for mbbsThoracolumbar fracture for mbbs
Thoracolumbar fracture for mbbs
 
Cervical trauma
Cervical traumaCervical trauma
Cervical trauma
 
Thoraco Lumbar Spine Injury
Thoraco Lumbar Spine InjuryThoraco Lumbar Spine Injury
Thoraco Lumbar Spine Injury
 
Bajammal 2006 Upper Cervical Trauma
Bajammal 2006 Upper Cervical TraumaBajammal 2006 Upper Cervical Trauma
Bajammal 2006 Upper Cervical Trauma
 
Proximal humerus fractures
Proximal humerus fracturesProximal humerus fractures
Proximal humerus fractures
 
Approaches to spine
Approaches to spineApproaches to spine
Approaches to spine
 
Proximal femur fractures
Proximal femur fracturesProximal femur fractures
Proximal femur fractures
 
Atlantoaxial injuries
Atlantoaxial injuriesAtlantoaxial injuries
Atlantoaxial injuries
 
Fractures of the olecranon
Fractures of the olecranonFractures of the olecranon
Fractures of the olecranon
 
The deltopectoral approach
The deltopectoral approachThe deltopectoral approach
The deltopectoral approach
 
Proximal humerus fractures
Proximal humerus fracturesProximal humerus fractures
Proximal humerus fractures
 
Injuries at occipitocervical junction
Injuries at occipitocervical junction Injuries at occipitocervical junction
Injuries at occipitocervical junction
 
Applied surgical anatomy of the craniovertebral spine
Applied surgical anatomy of the craniovertebral spineApplied surgical anatomy of the craniovertebral spine
Applied surgical anatomy of the craniovertebral spine
 
Technique transpedincular screw placement
Technique transpedincular screw placementTechnique transpedincular screw placement
Technique transpedincular screw placement
 

Semelhante a Cervical spine injuries.pptx

clavicle fracture new -1.pptx
clavicle fracture new -1.pptxclavicle fracture new -1.pptx
clavicle fracture new -1.pptxNamanSharda2
 
Cervical spine injuries and its management
Cervical spine injuries and its managementCervical spine injuries and its management
Cervical spine injuries and its managementPrashanth Kumar
 
cervicalspineinjuriesanditsmanagement-161119063840.pdf
cervicalspineinjuriesanditsmanagement-161119063840.pdfcervicalspineinjuriesanditsmanagement-161119063840.pdf
cervicalspineinjuriesanditsmanagement-161119063840.pdfdeepanraj369475
 
fractures around Elbow.pdf
fractures around Elbow.pdffractures around Elbow.pdf
fractures around Elbow.pdfFuadNaji1
 
paediatric injuries around the elbow.
paediatric injuries around the elbow. paediatric injuries around the elbow.
paediatric injuries around the elbow. yashavardhan yashu
 
proximalfemoralfractures-190716152524.pptx
proximalfemoralfractures-190716152524.pptxproximalfemoralfractures-190716152524.pptx
proximalfemoralfractures-190716152524.pptxgufp
 
Proximal femoral fractures
Proximal femoral fracturesProximal femoral fractures
Proximal femoral fracturesDr Souvik Paul
 
Comparative study of ORIF with philos plate vs CRIF with k wiring of Neers 2p...
Comparative study of ORIF with philos plate vs CRIF with k wiring of Neers 2p...Comparative study of ORIF with philos plate vs CRIF with k wiring of Neers 2p...
Comparative study of ORIF with philos plate vs CRIF with k wiring of Neers 2p...BalagangadharaC
 
C2 (Axis) cervical Spine Fracture Presentation
C2 (Axis) cervical Spine Fracture PresentationC2 (Axis) cervical Spine Fracture Presentation
C2 (Axis) cervical Spine Fracture PresentationAnas Ahmed
 
Mandibular Condylar fractures & its Management
Mandibular Condylar fractures & its ManagementMandibular Condylar fractures & its Management
Mandibular Condylar fractures & its ManagementMehul Hirani
 
upper cervical trauma.pptx
upper cervical trauma.pptxupper cervical trauma.pptx
upper cervical trauma.pptxLuckylogo Huang
 
Proximal humerus-fractures
Proximal humerus-fracturesProximal humerus-fractures
Proximal humerus-fracturesPrasanthmuddada
 
Clavicle and scapular fracture
Clavicle and scapular fractureClavicle and scapular fracture
Clavicle and scapular fractureAIIMS Bhopal
 
Cervical Spine Injury.pptx
Cervical Spine Injury.pptxCervical Spine Injury.pptx
Cervical Spine Injury.pptxAbrahamEmes
 

Semelhante a Cervical spine injuries.pptx (20)

Spinal injury
Spinal injurySpinal injury
Spinal injury
 
neck x ray.pptx
neck x ray.pptxneck x ray.pptx
neck x ray.pptx
 
clavicle fracture new -1.pptx
clavicle fracture new -1.pptxclavicle fracture new -1.pptx
clavicle fracture new -1.pptx
 
Cervical spine injuries and its management
Cervical spine injuries and its managementCervical spine injuries and its management
Cervical spine injuries and its management
 
cervicalspineinjuriesanditsmanagement-161119063840.pdf
cervicalspineinjuriesanditsmanagement-161119063840.pdfcervicalspineinjuriesanditsmanagement-161119063840.pdf
cervicalspineinjuriesanditsmanagement-161119063840.pdf
 
spinal cord injury
 spinal cord injury spinal cord injury
spinal cord injury
 
Forearm Fractures of Adults
Forearm Fractures of AdultsForearm Fractures of Adults
Forearm Fractures of Adults
 
Humerus fracture
Humerus fractureHumerus fracture
Humerus fracture
 
fractures around Elbow.pdf
fractures around Elbow.pdffractures around Elbow.pdf
fractures around Elbow.pdf
 
paediatric injuries around the elbow.
paediatric injuries around the elbow. paediatric injuries around the elbow.
paediatric injuries around the elbow.
 
proximalfemoralfractures-190716152524.pptx
proximalfemoralfractures-190716152524.pptxproximalfemoralfractures-190716152524.pptx
proximalfemoralfractures-190716152524.pptx
 
Proximal femoral fractures
Proximal femoral fracturesProximal femoral fractures
Proximal femoral fractures
 
Comparative study of ORIF with philos plate vs CRIF with k wiring of Neers 2p...
Comparative study of ORIF with philos plate vs CRIF with k wiring of Neers 2p...Comparative study of ORIF with philos plate vs CRIF with k wiring of Neers 2p...
Comparative study of ORIF with philos plate vs CRIF with k wiring of Neers 2p...
 
C2 (Axis) cervical Spine Fracture Presentation
C2 (Axis) cervical Spine Fracture PresentationC2 (Axis) cervical Spine Fracture Presentation
C2 (Axis) cervical Spine Fracture Presentation
 
Mandibular Condylar fractures & its Management
Mandibular Condylar fractures & its ManagementMandibular Condylar fractures & its Management
Mandibular Condylar fractures & its Management
 
upper cervical trauma.pptx
upper cervical trauma.pptxupper cervical trauma.pptx
upper cervical trauma.pptx
 
Proximal humerus-fractures
Proximal humerus-fracturesProximal humerus-fractures
Proximal humerus-fractures
 
Cervical spine trauma
Cervical spine traumaCervical spine trauma
Cervical spine trauma
 
Clavicle and scapular fracture
Clavicle and scapular fractureClavicle and scapular fracture
Clavicle and scapular fracture
 
Cervical Spine Injury.pptx
Cervical Spine Injury.pptxCervical Spine Injury.pptx
Cervical Spine Injury.pptx
 

Mais de Sairamakrishnan Sivadasan

Mais de Sairamakrishnan Sivadasan (19)

Lumbar interbody fusion.pptx
Lumbar interbody fusion.pptxLumbar interbody fusion.pptx
Lumbar interbody fusion.pptx
 
Clinical evaluation of spine.pptx
Clinical evaluation of spine.pptxClinical evaluation of spine.pptx
Clinical evaluation of spine.pptx
 
Spine Instrumentation.pptx
Spine Instrumentation.pptxSpine Instrumentation.pptx
Spine Instrumentation.pptx
 
Osteoporotic drugs
Osteoporotic drugsOsteoporotic drugs
Osteoporotic drugs
 
Bone plates
Bone platesBone plates
Bone plates
 
Ankylosing spondilitis
Ankylosing spondilitisAnkylosing spondilitis
Ankylosing spondilitis
 
Achondroplasia, Hypochondroplasia and Spondyloepiphyseal Dysplasia
Achondroplasia, Hypochondroplasia and Spondyloepiphyseal DysplasiaAchondroplasia, Hypochondroplasia and Spondyloepiphyseal Dysplasia
Achondroplasia, Hypochondroplasia and Spondyloepiphyseal Dysplasia
 
Ankle replacement
Ankle replacementAnkle replacement
Ankle replacement
 
Biomechanics of the hip and knee joint
Biomechanics of the hip and knee jointBiomechanics of the hip and knee joint
Biomechanics of the hip and knee joint
 
Calcium metabolism and vitamin D
Calcium metabolism and vitamin DCalcium metabolism and vitamin D
Calcium metabolism and vitamin D
 
Choice of implant in THR
Choice of implant in THRChoice of implant in THR
Choice of implant in THR
 
Embryology of shoulder joint
Embryology of shoulder jointEmbryology of shoulder joint
Embryology of shoulder joint
 
Fusion techniques spine
Fusion techniques spineFusion techniques spine
Fusion techniques spine
 
Gait cycle
Gait cycleGait cycle
Gait cycle
 
Congenital hemivertebra and tethered cord syndrome
Congenital hemivertebra and tethered cord syndromeCongenital hemivertebra and tethered cord syndrome
Congenital hemivertebra and tethered cord syndrome
 
Limb length discrepancies
Limb length discrepanciesLimb length discrepancies
Limb length discrepancies
 
Spondylolisthesis
SpondylolisthesisSpondylolisthesis
Spondylolisthesis
 
Tendon repair
Tendon repairTendon repair
Tendon repair
 
Torticollis
TorticollisTorticollis
Torticollis
 

Último

💚😋Chandigarh Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋
💚😋Chandigarh Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋💚😋Chandigarh Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋
💚😋Chandigarh Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋Sheetaleventcompany
 
Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...
Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...
Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...Sheetaleventcompany
 
Enjoyment ★ 8854095900 Indian Call Girls In Dehradun 🍆🍌 By Dehradun Call Girl ★
Enjoyment ★ 8854095900 Indian Call Girls In Dehradun 🍆🍌 By Dehradun Call Girl ★Enjoyment ★ 8854095900 Indian Call Girls In Dehradun 🍆🍌 By Dehradun Call Girl ★
Enjoyment ★ 8854095900 Indian Call Girls In Dehradun 🍆🍌 By Dehradun Call Girl ★indiancallgirl4rent
 
VIP Call Girl Sector 88 Gurgaon Delhi Just Call Me 9899900591
VIP Call Girl Sector 88 Gurgaon Delhi Just Call Me 9899900591VIP Call Girl Sector 88 Gurgaon Delhi Just Call Me 9899900591
VIP Call Girl Sector 88 Gurgaon Delhi Just Call Me 9899900591adityaroy0215
 
VIP Kolkata Call Girl New Town 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl New Town 👉 8250192130  Available With RoomVIP Kolkata Call Girl New Town 👉 8250192130  Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl New Town 👉 8250192130 Available With Roomdivyansh0kumar0
 
💚😋Mumbai Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋
💚😋Mumbai Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋💚😋Mumbai Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋
💚😋Mumbai Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋Sheetaleventcompany
 
Nepali Escort Girl * 9999965857 Naughty Call Girls Service in Faridabad
Nepali Escort Girl * 9999965857 Naughty Call Girls Service in FaridabadNepali Escort Girl * 9999965857 Naughty Call Girls Service in Faridabad
Nepali Escort Girl * 9999965857 Naughty Call Girls Service in Faridabadgragteena
 
Russian Call Girls Kota * 8250192130 Service starts from just ₹9999 ✅
Russian Call Girls Kota * 8250192130 Service starts from just ₹9999 ✅Russian Call Girls Kota * 8250192130 Service starts from just ₹9999 ✅
Russian Call Girls Kota * 8250192130 Service starts from just ₹9999 ✅gragmanisha42
 
pOOJA sexy Call Girls In Sector 49,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Service In...
pOOJA sexy Call Girls In Sector 49,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Service In...pOOJA sexy Call Girls In Sector 49,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Service In...
pOOJA sexy Call Girls In Sector 49,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Service In...Call Girls Noida
 
Hot Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
Hot  Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In ChandigarhHot  Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
Hot Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In ChandigarhVip call girls In Chandigarh
 
Chandigarh Call Girls 👙 7001035870 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Chandigarh Call Girls 👙 7001035870 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetChandigarh Call Girls 👙 7001035870 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Chandigarh Call Girls 👙 7001035870 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meetpriyashah722354
 
VIP Call Girls Noida Jhanvi 9711199171 Best VIP Call Girls Near Me
VIP Call Girls Noida Jhanvi 9711199171 Best VIP Call Girls Near MeVIP Call Girls Noida Jhanvi 9711199171 Best VIP Call Girls Near Me
VIP Call Girls Noida Jhanvi 9711199171 Best VIP Call Girls Near Memriyagarg453
 
VIP Call Girls Sector 67 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9711199012
VIP Call Girls Sector 67 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9711199012VIP Call Girls Sector 67 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9711199012
VIP Call Girls Sector 67 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9711199012Call Girls Service Gurgaon
 
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR Call G...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR   Call G...❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR   Call G...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR Call G...Gfnyt.com
 
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in LucknowRussian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknowgragteena
 
Call Girl Price Amritsar ❤️🍑 9053900678 Call Girls in Amritsar Suman
Call Girl Price Amritsar ❤️🍑 9053900678 Call Girls in Amritsar SumanCall Girl Price Amritsar ❤️🍑 9053900678 Call Girls in Amritsar Suman
Call Girl Price Amritsar ❤️🍑 9053900678 Call Girls in Amritsar SumanCall Girls Service Chandigarh Ayushi
 
Bangalore call girl 👯‍♀️@ Simran Independent Call Girls in Bangalore GIUXUZ...
Bangalore call girl  👯‍♀️@ Simran Independent Call Girls in Bangalore  GIUXUZ...Bangalore call girl  👯‍♀️@ Simran Independent Call Girls in Bangalore  GIUXUZ...
Bangalore call girl 👯‍♀️@ Simran Independent Call Girls in Bangalore GIUXUZ...Gfnyt
 
VIP Call Girl Sector 32 Noida Just Book Me 9711199171
VIP Call Girl Sector 32 Noida Just Book Me 9711199171VIP Call Girl Sector 32 Noida Just Book Me 9711199171
VIP Call Girl Sector 32 Noida Just Book Me 9711199171Call Girls Service Gurgaon
 
Krishnagiri call girls Tamil aunty 7877702510
Krishnagiri call girls Tamil aunty 7877702510Krishnagiri call girls Tamil aunty 7877702510
Krishnagiri call girls Tamil aunty 7877702510Vipesco
 

Último (20)

💚😋Chandigarh Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋
💚😋Chandigarh Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋💚😋Chandigarh Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋
💚😋Chandigarh Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋
 
Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...
Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...
Call Girl In Zirakpur ❤️♀️@ 9988299661 Zirakpur Call Girls Near Me ❤️♀️@ Sexy...
 
Enjoyment ★ 8854095900 Indian Call Girls In Dehradun 🍆🍌 By Dehradun Call Girl ★
Enjoyment ★ 8854095900 Indian Call Girls In Dehradun 🍆🍌 By Dehradun Call Girl ★Enjoyment ★ 8854095900 Indian Call Girls In Dehradun 🍆🍌 By Dehradun Call Girl ★
Enjoyment ★ 8854095900 Indian Call Girls In Dehradun 🍆🍌 By Dehradun Call Girl ★
 
Model Call Girl in Subhash Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Subhash Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Subhash Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Subhash Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
VIP Call Girl Sector 88 Gurgaon Delhi Just Call Me 9899900591
VIP Call Girl Sector 88 Gurgaon Delhi Just Call Me 9899900591VIP Call Girl Sector 88 Gurgaon Delhi Just Call Me 9899900591
VIP Call Girl Sector 88 Gurgaon Delhi Just Call Me 9899900591
 
VIP Kolkata Call Girl New Town 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl New Town 👉 8250192130  Available With RoomVIP Kolkata Call Girl New Town 👉 8250192130  Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl New Town 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
 
💚😋Mumbai Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋
💚😋Mumbai Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋💚😋Mumbai Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋
💚😋Mumbai Escort Service Call Girls, ₹5000 To 25K With AC💚😋
 
Nepali Escort Girl * 9999965857 Naughty Call Girls Service in Faridabad
Nepali Escort Girl * 9999965857 Naughty Call Girls Service in FaridabadNepali Escort Girl * 9999965857 Naughty Call Girls Service in Faridabad
Nepali Escort Girl * 9999965857 Naughty Call Girls Service in Faridabad
 
Russian Call Girls Kota * 8250192130 Service starts from just ₹9999 ✅
Russian Call Girls Kota * 8250192130 Service starts from just ₹9999 ✅Russian Call Girls Kota * 8250192130 Service starts from just ₹9999 ✅
Russian Call Girls Kota * 8250192130 Service starts from just ₹9999 ✅
 
pOOJA sexy Call Girls In Sector 49,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Service In...
pOOJA sexy Call Girls In Sector 49,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Service In...pOOJA sexy Call Girls In Sector 49,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Service In...
pOOJA sexy Call Girls In Sector 49,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Service In...
 
Hot Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
Hot  Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In ChandigarhHot  Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
Hot Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
 
Chandigarh Call Girls 👙 7001035870 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Chandigarh Call Girls 👙 7001035870 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetChandigarh Call Girls 👙 7001035870 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Chandigarh Call Girls 👙 7001035870 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
 
VIP Call Girls Noida Jhanvi 9711199171 Best VIP Call Girls Near Me
VIP Call Girls Noida Jhanvi 9711199171 Best VIP Call Girls Near MeVIP Call Girls Noida Jhanvi 9711199171 Best VIP Call Girls Near Me
VIP Call Girls Noida Jhanvi 9711199171 Best VIP Call Girls Near Me
 
VIP Call Girls Sector 67 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9711199012
VIP Call Girls Sector 67 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9711199012VIP Call Girls Sector 67 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9711199012
VIP Call Girls Sector 67 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9711199012
 
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR Call G...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR   Call G...❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR   Call G...
❤️♀️@ Jaipur Call Girls ❤️♀️@ Meghna Jaipur Call Girls Number CRTHNR Call G...
 
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in LucknowRussian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
Russian Escorts Aishbagh Road * 9548273370 Naughty Call Girls Service in Lucknow
 
Call Girl Price Amritsar ❤️🍑 9053900678 Call Girls in Amritsar Suman
Call Girl Price Amritsar ❤️🍑 9053900678 Call Girls in Amritsar SumanCall Girl Price Amritsar ❤️🍑 9053900678 Call Girls in Amritsar Suman
Call Girl Price Amritsar ❤️🍑 9053900678 Call Girls in Amritsar Suman
 
Bangalore call girl 👯‍♀️@ Simran Independent Call Girls in Bangalore GIUXUZ...
Bangalore call girl  👯‍♀️@ Simran Independent Call Girls in Bangalore  GIUXUZ...Bangalore call girl  👯‍♀️@ Simran Independent Call Girls in Bangalore  GIUXUZ...
Bangalore call girl 👯‍♀️@ Simran Independent Call Girls in Bangalore GIUXUZ...
 
VIP Call Girl Sector 32 Noida Just Book Me 9711199171
VIP Call Girl Sector 32 Noida Just Book Me 9711199171VIP Call Girl Sector 32 Noida Just Book Me 9711199171
VIP Call Girl Sector 32 Noida Just Book Me 9711199171
 
Krishnagiri call girls Tamil aunty 7877702510
Krishnagiri call girls Tamil aunty 7877702510Krishnagiri call girls Tamil aunty 7877702510
Krishnagiri call girls Tamil aunty 7877702510
 

Cervical spine injuries.pptx

  • 1. Cervical spine injuries Dr. Sairamakrishnan S
  • 2. • Upper cervical injuries – C1,C2 • Lower cervical injuries – C3 to C7
  • 4. Demographics • Common in children and in people >60 years • Paediatric • MVA in 38% of cases • 1 to 9% of all spine injuries. • 56 to 73% of cervical spine injuries. • 53% with head injuries (41% mortality)
  • 5. • Age >60 years • Occurs from minor trauma • osteoporosis/osteopenia • spondylosis of the lower cervical spine • 69.8% of all cervical spine trauma • 57% are odontoid fractures • Lower rate of neurologic injury (26% to 28% mortality)
  • 6. Anatomy of the Upper Cervical Spine • Three-unit joint - bones of the occiput, atlas, and axis, their synovial articulations, and the associated ligamentous structures. • Six synovial joints – 2 x occipitoatlantal joints, anterior and posterior median atlantoodontoid joints, 2 x atlantoaxial joints • Occiput-C1 articulation supplies approximately 50% of total cervical flexion and extension. • C1-C2 articulations supply 50% of total cervical rotation.
  • 7. • The ligamentous restraints provide the necessary stability to prevent injury to the enclosed brainstem and spinal cord • Anterior longitudinal ligament • Cruciform ligament • Tectorial membrane (extension of the posterior longitudinal ligament) • Nuchal ligament • Atlanto-odontoid ligament • Apical ligament • Alar ligaments
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10. Clinical Evaluation • Cervical spine injury has been closely linked to • severe head injury • high-energy mechanism • focal neurologic deficit • Adequate airway and ventilation must be established - Nasotracheal intubation or cricothyroidotomy is safest. • initial stabilization – rigid cervical collar, spine board, sandbags. • noncontiguous spinal injuries - 6% • 24% overall incidence of vertebral artery injury - fatal ischemic damage
  • 11. • Neurologic evaluation – difficult • occipitocervical junction – incomplete cord injury – compression/injury of the pyramidal decussation – mimics central cord syndrome • Lower cranial nerves – CN IX, X, XI, XII
  • 12. Imaging • Plain radiography • Anteroposterior • Lateral • Open-mouth view • Flexion and extension views – 33% voluntary gaurding
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16. • Computed tomography (CT) • Most sensitive modality • Sensitivity of 84% • Cost effective as a primary screening tool
  • 17.
  • 18. • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) • Poor sensitivity for detecting fractures • Gold standard for detecting neurological injuries and to detect hematomas.
  • 19.
  • 20. Occipital Condyle Fractures • High energy trauma to the head and neck • Complaints of • High cervical pain • Torticollis • Headaches • Impaired mobility • Extremely difficult to detect with conventional radiography. • CT with reconstruction is the imaging modality of choice.
  • 21. • Anderson and Montesano classification • Type 1 • impaction fractures of the condyle from axial loading • If unilateral – stable • Type 2 • part of a more extensive basioccipital fracture that involves one or both occipital condyles. • Usually stable • Type 3 • avulsion fractures near the alar ligament insertion that result in medial displacement of the condylar fracture fragment • Usually unstable
  • 22. • Management • Patients with occipitocervical misalignment only should be treated in a halo vest or with a posterior fusion. • Rest all patients can be treated with rigid cervical collar. Maserati MB, Stephens B, Zohny Z, et al: Occipital condyle fractures: clinical decision rule and surgical management. J Neurosurg Spine 11:388-395, 2009.
  • 23. Atlanto-Occipital Injuries • Children younger than 12 years of age are uniquely predisposed to this injury because their occipitoatlantal joints are flatter and because their head weight–to–body weight ratio is significantly greater than in adults. • Account for 19% to 35% of all deaths from cervical spine trauma. • Significant retropharyngeal soft tissue swelling at C3 will be seen. • Flexion-extension views are not recommended.
  • 24. • Powers’ ratio, the ratio of the distance from the basion to the posterior arch of the atlas divided by the distance from the opisthion to the anterior arch of the atlas, should be 1.0 or less in the absence of anterior occipitoatlantal dislocation
  • 25. • The distance between the basion and the posterior axial line (the basion-axial interval) is greater than 12 mm then occipitocervical instability is present.
  • 27. • All occipitocervical dislocations should be treated initially by immediate application of a halo vest. • Because the majority of these injuries are unstable, posterior occipitocervical fusion is the procedure of choice Eismont FJ, Bohlman HH: Posterior atlanto-occipital dislocation with fractures of the atlas and odontoid process. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:397-399, 1978. Montane I, Eismont FJ, Green BA: Traumatic occipitoatlantal dislocation. Spine 16:112-116, 1991.
  • 28. Fractures of the Atlas • First described by Jefferson in 1921. • 2% to 13% of all cervical spine fractures. • 25% of all injuries to the atlantoaxial complex. • Seen in the younger age groups (mean age, 30 years). • Caused by axial loading. • Fractures usually occur in the anterior and posterior arches. • Neurologic injury is uncommon in the case of isolated fractures of the atlas.
  • 29. • Jefferson classification • Type 1 – Posterior arch fracture • Type 2 – Anterior arch fracture • Type 3 – Burst fracture • Type 4 – Lateral mass fracture
  • 30. • Stable fractures that can be treated in a cervical collar • Lateral mass nondisplaced injuries can be treated with a cervical collar. • Lateral mass injuries that are displaced more than 5 mm can be treated with immediate halo vest application. • Burst fractures < 7mm displacement are treated with cervical collar • Burst fractures > 7mm displacement are treated with a halo vest for 3 months. Post removal if significant C1-C2 instability then C1-C2 fusion.
  • 31. • Traction reduction followed by early C1-C2 fusion using C1-C2 transarticular screws has also been described. • Intraoperative difficulty may be found owing to gross instability of the C1 lateral masses and the loose C1 posterior arch. McGuire RA Jr, Harkey HL: Primary treatment of unstable Jefferson’s fractures. J Spinal Disord 8:233- 236, 1995.
  • 32.
  • 33. Atlantoaxial Subluxation and Dislocation • Patients present with a “cock robin” appearance with the head tilted toward and rotated away from the side of the dislocation. • Radiographs will show asymmetry of the lateral masses on the open- mouth view. • Dynamic CT with head rotations is ideal.
  • 34. Fielding and hawkins classification • Type 1 – Rotatory subluxation without anterior shift • Type 2 – Rotatory displacement with anterior displacement 3-5 mm • Type 3 – Rotatory displacement with anterior displacement >5 mm • Type 4 – Rotatory displacement with posterior displacement
  • 35. • Closed reduction with skull thongs and cervical collar application is done. • If reduction was difficult to achieve then halo application is done. • If closed reduction fails then open reduction with C1 C2 fusion is done.
  • 36. Fractures of the Odontoid • Fractures of the dens constitute 7% to 13% of all cervical spine injuries. • Hyperflexion results in anterior displacement of the dens fracture, and hyperextension results in posterior displacement of the dens fracture. • The fracture can usually be seen on open-mouth and lateral radiographs of the cervical spine, although nondisplaced fractures can easily be missed.
  • 37. • Anderson classification • Type 1 - avulsion injuries at the tip of the dens. • Type 2 - through the base of the dens. • Type 3 - extend into the body of the axis.
  • 38. • Type 1 injuries can be treated nonoperatively with a rigid cervical collar. After 3 months of immobilization, flexion and extension radiographs are taken. • Type II odontoid fracture is the most problematic type of odontoid fracture. High chance of non-union (33%). • There is an increased nonunion rate associated with fractures with greater than 5 mm of displacement, angulation greater than 10 degrees, age older than 40 years, and posterior displacement.
  • 39. • Halo vest treatment may be a good option for a patient with an undisplaced type II odontoid fracture or an undisplaced/minimally displaced type III odontoid fracture. • In patients with high risk for non union (old age, smoking) primary C1C2 fusion can be done which increases the union rate to 96%. • Primary fixation of Dens is ideal in transverse, noncomminuted, and reducible fractures and preserves cervical rotation.
  • 40. • Primary fixation of dens is associated with higher complications and non-union in elderly (13-17%) • Jeanneret et al in their study said that improvement in rotational movements with primary fixation of dens is insignificant. Jeanneret B, Vernet O, Frei S, Magerl F: Atlantoaxial mobility after screw fixation of the odontoid: A computed tomographic study. J Spinal Disord 4:203-211, 1991.
  • 41. Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of the Axis (Hangman’s franture) • The fracture line passes through the neural arch of the axis. • Combinations of extension, flexion, distraction, and axial loading of the cervical spine.
  • 42. • Modified effendi classification • Type 1 - occur through the pars interarticularis bilaterally with less than 3 mm translation and no angulation. • Type 2 - bipedicular fractures with greater than 3 mm of displacement. • Type 2A - angulation >11* but has minimal translation. • Type 3 - associated with unilateral or bilateral facet dislocations.
  • 43. • In type 1 fractures the disc and ligaments are intact. • In type 2 fractures there is disruption of the C2C3 disc with compression fracture of the anterosuperior corner of C3 or the posteroinferior body of C2. • In type 2a fractures there is significant disruption of the disc and posterior longitudinal ligament. Associated with a 33% incidence of neurologic deficit. • Type 3 has disruption of the posterior longitudinal ligament and the C2-C3 intervertebral disc occurs in these injuries. These injuries are commonly associated with neurologic injuries.
  • 44. • Type III injuries occur in three basic patterns: • bilateral neural arch fractures anterior to the facet joints with bilateral facet dislocations posterior to it • a rotational injury with fracture of the neural arch on one side anterior to the facet joint and on the second side in the area of the facet joint causing a unilateral facet dislocation • a bilateral facet dislocation with fractures of the neural arch just posterior to the facet joints.
  • 45. • Isolated type I fractures can be treated in a rigid cervical collar for 8 to 12 weeks. • Type II fractures are treated with initial traction in extension followed by immobilization in a halo vest. • Type IIa fractures are treated with immediate application of a halo vest. Traction is avoided in patients with type IIa injuries because even minimal traction can cause severe overdistraction. • All type III fractures should be treated with surgical reduction and posterior C2-C3 fusion.
  • 46. Injuries of the Lower Cervical Spine
  • 47. Anatomy • The subaxial cervical spine is highly mobile but protective of its soft tissue contents, namely the spinal cord, nerve roots, and vertebral arteries. • Each vertebra from C3 to 7 is progressively larger and is connected both above and below by three articulations, the disc complex and the paired lateral pillars. • These form three columns that are essential for the weight-bearing function of the spine. • The anterior column is connected to each lateral pillar by pedicles, and the lateral pillars are connected by the lamina.
  • 48. • The large spinous processes are levers for attachment of the paraspinal muscles and ligaments. • Posterior ligamentous complex is essential to maintaining stability against flexion and anterior shear forces.
  • 49. Bony anatomy • Vertebral bodies are relatively large weight-bearing cuboid structures that are connected to each other by the intervertebral disc. • The uncus is responsible for resistance to lateral bending, lateral listhesis, and rotation. • Short transverse processes extend lateral from the body about midlevel in anteroposterior direction and are confluent with vestigial ribs forming the foramen transversarium. • Within this structure lies the vertebral artery and venous plexus except at C7, which is void.
  • 50. • Pedicles extend posteriorly and outward from the cranial aspect of the posterior wall of the body to the lateral masses. • Because of the close proximity of the vertebral arteries, pedicle screw is often considered dangerous and supplanted by the use of the lateral masses as screw anchorage. • The lateral masses or pillars when viewed laterally are parallelogram in shape and appear square when viewed ventrally or dorsally. • Superior and inferior articular facets have cartilage surfaces that form the facet articulations.
  • 51. • The superior facet is located behind the neuroforamen and, when fractured, may cause root injury. • The laminae are thin plates of bone that extend from the lateral mass obliquely posterior and meet each other at the base of the spinous process. • The spinous processes project posteriorly, angling downward, and are progressively larger from cranial to caudal direction. • The spinous process of C3 to C5 is always bifid, whereas C6 may be and C7 is never bifid.
  • 52.
  • 53.
  • 54.
  • 55. Ligamentous Anatomy • The ligaments of the cervical spine are essential to maintain both stability and range of motion. • The anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments lie on the respective surfaces of the vertebral body. • The annulus joins the corresponding vertebral bodies and is the primary restraint to all directions of movements. • The posterior ligamentous complex consists of the nuchal ligaments, ligamentum flava, facet joint capsules, and all bony attachments.
  • 56. • The nuchal ligaments include the ligamentum nuchae, which is a thick band strongly attached to the spinous processes of C2 and C7. • The ligamentum nuchae blends with the supraspinous ligament, which bands together each spinous process at their tips. • Between the spinous processes are the interspinous ligaments. • The ligamentum flava attaches to the underside of the cranial lamina and top-most aspect of the caudal vertebrae. • Each facet articulation has relatively redundant facet capsules that offer only a small amount of stability
  • 57.
  • 58. Neurovascular Anatomy • The spinal cord is an elastic structure that lies inside the spinal canal. • In adults its anteroposterior diameter measures about 8 mm and cross-section is slightly oval. • At each disc level ventral and dorsal roots sprout and join laterally, forming the spinal nerve in the neuroforamina. • Neuroforamina are bordered anteriorly by the posterior lateral corner of the disc and uncus, above and below by pedicles and posteriorly by the superior articular facet and lateral mass.
  • 59. • The vertebral artery ascends from the subclavian artery to pass within the foramen transversarium at C6, although in 1% of cases this can occur aberrantly at C7 or higher levels. • It exits the foramen transversarium of C2 turning anteriorly and medially in C2 and then again laterally into C1.
  • 60.
  • 61. Kinematics • Kinematically each segment of the subaxial spine normally has approximately 11, 5, and 5 degrees of movement in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and rotation. • Small amounts (1 to 2 mm) of translation occur in both anterior- posterior and lateral directions.
  • 62. Classification • Cervical Spine Injury Severity Score • The Cervical Spine Injury Severity Score (CSISS) is based on independent analysis of four columns • The anterior column includes the body, disc including the annulus, anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments, and transverse processes. • Each lateral column is scored separately and includes the facet projections, lateral mass, pedicles, and facet joint capsules. • The posterior column includes the lamina, spinous process, ligamentum flavum, and nuchal ligaments.
  • 63. • Each column is scored using a 0-5 analog scale. • Fractional scores can be used. • Scores increase proportional to either displacement of fracture fragments or separation as a result of soft tissue injury. • For example, a nondisplaced fracture is scored 1 while the worst injury possible for that column is a 5. • Each column is scored independently and summed, giving the CSISS ranging 0-20.
  • 64.
  • 65.
  • 66. • Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification • Evaluates fracture morphology, the discoligamentous complex, and neurologic function, creating a comprehensive system to aid treatment decision making. • The system assigns points for each domain and if the score exceeds a threshold, surgery would be indicated.
  • 67. • Morphology • Compression injuries are assigned one point, with an additional point being assigned for burst fractures or when greater than 10 degrees of scoliosis is created by lateral compression injuries. • Distraction injuries have a poor prognosis, and are therefore assigned three points. • Rotation and translational injuries such as from facet dislocations are given four points.
  • 68. • Discoligamentous Complex • Anteriorly these include the disc annulus complex and the anterior/posterior longitudinal ligaments. • Posteriorly these include the nuchal ligaments as well as the ligamentum flavum and facet capsules. • The discoligamentous complex is scored 0 for intact, 1 for indeterminate, and 2 for disrupted.
  • 69. • Neurologic Function • Root injuries have a good prognosis and are scored 1. • Complete cord injuries are given 2 points. • Three points are assigned for incomplete, which is a higher score than for complete because incomplete injuries are more likely to benefit from surgery. • Finally, an additional point is added when residual neural tissue compression is present in patients with neurologic deficits.
  • 70. • A patient with an SLIC score equal to 3 is treated nonoperatively, whereas surgery is recommended in a patient with a score equal to 5. • Scores of 4 can be treated either operatively or nonoperatively.
  • 71.
  • 72.
  • 73.
  • 74.
  • 75. Anterior Compression Fractures • Anterior compression fractures, like burst fractures, occur from hyperflexion and/or axial loading forces. • During this loading, the disc is pressurized, resulting in failure of the endplate and creating wedging of the vertebral body. • . This usually occurs along the superior endplate. • During hyperflexion the posterior ligaments may be strained beyond physiologic limits, causing disruption. This injury pattern has been termed “hidden flexion injury” and often fails nonoperative treatment.
  • 76. Burst Fractures • Caused by rapid increase in intradiscal pressure resulting in failure of the superior endplate, which is driven along with the disc into the vertebral body. • The rapid increased intravertebral pressure creates hoop stresses and eventual failure of the body with radial displacement of bone fragments. • In addition, the pedicles are pushed outward causing posterior fractures. • Often flexion is present, causing posterior ligamentous complex disruption and/or facet subluxation, fracture, or dislocation.
  • 77.
  • 78. Flexion Axial Loading Injury • Also called tear drop fractures, are devastating injuries due to the propensity for neurologic injury and often are the result of diving or other sports-related activities. • The injury occurs from a compression force obliquely applied in a downward and posterior direction. • Forces are concentrated in the anterior inferior corner of the vertebral body, which is sheared off, giving the injury its name. • The remaining part of the vertebral body shears through the disc space and rotates posteriorly into the spinal canal, crushing the spinal cord.
  • 79.
  • 80. Transverse Process Fractures • Transverse process fractures are quite common, occurring in isolation or in association with other more severe injuries. • These fractures are not involved with spinal stability and therefore are not significant in treatment decision making for the spine. • However, transverse process fractures at C6 and above may warn of possible vertebral artery injury.
  • 81. Disc-Distraction Injury • Impacting the head or face in a fall or forward striking a windshield creates hyperextension, compression, and posterior shear. • The anterior longitudinal ligament and disc annulus can fail from tension. • Excessive compressive loading of the lateral masses and impaction of the spinous process may cause fracture. • The disc distraction injury occurs often in spondylotic spines. • The forced hyperextension with compression can transiently narrow the spinal canal, causing spinal cord injury, typical of the central cord type.
  • 82. Treatment of Anterior Column Injuries • Anterior column injuries with low SLIC or CSISS scores can be treated non-operatively. • Less significant injuries can be treated with a cervical collar, while burst fractures and flexion/axial loading injuries can be treated with a cervical thoracic orthosis (CTO) or halo vest. • Surgical indications for anterior column injuries are those with evidence of disruption of the posterior ligamentous complex as demonstrated by high CSISS and SLIC scores.
  • 83. • Although both anterior and posterior approaches may be used, it is recommend addressing pathology at its major location (anteriorly). • After strut grafting or insertion of a cage, an anterior plate is applied. • Surgical indications for disc distraction injuries are cases with any significant displacement, ongoing neurologic symptoms, or chronic pain. • Anterior discectomy and fusion are indicated in neurologically intact patients and those with radiculopathy or those with cord injury limited to injured level.
  • 84. • If multilevel stenosis options available are single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion combined with posterior decompression or posterior decompression with posterior fusion.
  • 85.
  • 86.
  • 87.
  • 88. Spinous Process and Lamina Fractures • Occur from impaction forces as a result of compression during forced hyperextension. • Paraspinal muscle contractions can also result in spinous process fractures termed clay shoveler’s fracture.
  • 89. Posterior Ligamentous Injury without Subluxation • Posterior ligamentous disruptions occur from hyperflexion and are worsened with any rotation. • Posterior ligamentous injuries without subluxation are suspected when interspinous process spreading is present but without vertebral or facet subluxation.
  • 90. Treatment of Posterior Column Injuries • Management of isolated spinous process and lamina fractures is with simple collar immobilization. • Because they may be associated with complete posterior ligamentous complex disruption, kyphosis or progressive subluxation may occur. • Spinous process fractures may not heal due to the displacement from muscle contractions, although this rarely leads to chronic pain or further surgical treatment.
  • 91. • Isolated posterior ligamentous injuries without subluxation have a worse prognosis. • Initial management of these injuries unless there is MRI evidence of complete disruption is nonoperative in a collar or CTO. The latter is preferred at the lower cervical spine (C5-C7). • If upright radiographs demonstrate increasing deformity or excessive motion after 8 to 10 weeks of immobilization, surgery is recommended. • Patients with complete ligamentous disruption can be taken for posterior surgery.
  • 92. Isolated Facet Fractures • Isolated facet fractures occur from forced impaction against the neighboring facet, usually with a component of anterior shear. • Should always be evaluated with the suspicion that greater instability is present. • Plain radiographs may miss these injuries unless subluxation is present. • CT is sensitive for these injuries, and they are best evaluated on sagittal reconstructions.
  • 93. Lateral Mass Fractures • Lateral mass fractures most commonly result from lateral compression or hyperextension where facets impact each other. • Transiently this may narrow the neuroforamina with resultant root injury.
  • 94. • Kotani classification • Type I is a fracture separation. There is an ipsilateral pedicle and lamina fracture. • . Type II lateral mass fractures are highly comminuted. • Type III is a vertical fracture in the coronal plane with invagination of the superior facet into the cranial lateral mass. • Type IV fractures are traumatic spondylolisthesis, which usually occurs at C7 or T1.
  • 95. Unilateral Facet Dislocations • Head rotation or rotation associated with flexion cause forward and upward translation of the opposite facet, which when severe causes unilateral facet dislocation and in many cases facet fracture as well. • There is associated injury to the intervertebral disc and ligamentum flava. • CT will show that the inferior facet of the rostral vertebra is anterior to the superior facet of the caudal vertebra.
  • 96. Bilateral Facet Dislocation • Bilateral facet dislocations are devastating injuries frequently resulting in quadriplegia. • Bilateral facet dislocations occur from hyperflexion with or without rotation. • There will always be associated disruption of the posterior ligamentous complex. • Fractures of the facets, lamina, and spinous processes are common. • Posterior interspinous widening is usually present. • The disc may be inappropriately narrowed, suggesting posterior herniation. • The spinal canal is significantly narrowed
  • 97. Treatment of Lateral Column Injuries • Isolated facet fractures can be treated nonoperatively with a collar or CTO – should look for increasing kyphosis. • Type I lateral mass fractures with minimal anterior translation can be treated nonoperatively with a CTO or preferably a halo vest. • Those having subluxation should be treated surgically. • An important surgical consideration is that lateral mass separations involve two motion segments. • Fusion at only one of these levels may be associated with late subluxation at the other level.
  • 98. • The preferred treatment is posterior lateral mass fixation at two motion segments. • Anterior fusion at both segments is an alternative option. • Type II comminuted lateral mass fractures are treated similarly • Type III can be treated with an orthosis unless significant displacement is present. • Type IV traumatic spondylolisthesis is difficult to reduce and often comminuted. • Open reduction is usually required and is best performed posteriorly.
  • 99.
  • 100.
  • 101. Special Injury Types • ankylosed spines • central cord syndrome • vertical distraction injuries • fractures in the elderly
  • 102. Ankylosed Spines • Ankylosing spondylitis, diffuse idiopathic spinal hyperostosis • Increased risk of spinal column and cord injury. • The loss of intervertebral disc decreases elastic deformation following trauma further amplified by long lever arms. • Spine may be may be osteoporotic and have potential for epidural bleeding. • The anterior column fails in tension and compressive forces are then created posteriorly, resulting in fractures of the spinous processes and lamina.
  • 103. • The treatment of subaxial fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis is surgical unless medically contraindicated. • The aggressive approach is warranted by the high incidence of displacement and resultant neurologic injury or kyphosis that can occur with nonoperative treatment. • The surgical treatment is best performed with posterior instrumentation over many segments because there is no concern over fusing many segments. • Bone graft is not necessary, although local bone graft can be added at the fracture site.
  • 104. Central Cord Syndrome • Occurs from a hyperextension injury in patients with narrow spinal canals, usually from spondylosis. • This causes infolding of the ligamentum flavum and bulging of the disc creating a pincer to the spinal cord. • Radiographically no significant injuries are noted. • Neurologic examination is a picture of greater involvement of the upper extremities than the lower extremity and sacral roots. • Neurologic manifestations reflect injury to the central gray matter and surrounding white matter in the central spinal cord.
  • 105. • The axonal tracts to the upper extremities are located more centrally than the lower extremity and sacral regions and therefore are injured to a greater degree leading to the classic pattern of neurologic findings. • The overall prognosis for this injury is good, although hand function may remain poor. • Aggressive surgical approach is advocated with the goals to speed recovery, shorten hospitalization, and reduce morbidity
  • 106. Vertical Distraction Injury • This is a rare devastating injury where there is vertical separation between the vertebral segments through the disc space and facet articulations. • Complete spinal cord injury is always present and vascular abnormities should be anticipated. • Occur from rapid head deceleration or from hanging. • Excessive tensile forces result in disruption of all ligamentous constraints and are only limited by elasticity of the neurovascular elements.
  • 107. • Traction is contraindicated and reduction is best achieved either surgically or by halo vest. • Definitive treatment by combined anteroposterior fixation is recommended.
  • 108. Fractures in Geriatric Patients • Elderly patients are more prone to injury due to osteoporosis, generalized sensory imbalance with aging, developmental stenosis with increased risk of spinal cord injury, and a higher rate of vehicular accidents per mile driven. • Mortality of geriatric patients with cervical fractures ranges 30% to 50%. • Treatment by traction, prolonged bed rest, and the halo vest are associated with increased mortality and should be avoided. • Geriatric patients are particularly prone to aspiration pneumonia due to retropharyngeal soft tissue swelling and dysphagia.
  • 109. • If medical conditions allow, rigid stabilization should be considered for any marginal or unstable injury. • Posterior fusions are preffered in order to avoid anterior approaches and the consequent risk of airway or swallowing complications.