Armenian Genocide Essay

Armenian Genocide and Holocaust Comparison
More than thirteen million people from over four different religions and races were killed during
the Holocaust and Armenian Genocide in the Ottoman Empire. That is more than half the number
of people that died in World War I. The book Maus by Art Spigelman tells the story of a man who
was a victim of and lived through the Holocaust. The Holocaust and Amenian Genocide are
indistinguishable because of not only the amount of people that died but also for three more main
reasons. These reasons are the gruesome leaders of both genocides, the merciless dehumanization
that was forced upon the Armenians, Jews, and Lebanese, and the unreasonable murder tactics. !
First of all, there were many people that were part of the extermination of...show more content...
During the Holocaust, they were willing to spend great amounts of money to kill the Jews just as
long as they were all dead. The Jews were killed in gas chambers, shot down oneby–one into mass
graves, and tortured for no good reason (Maus 241–244). ! The Holocaust and Amenian Genocide
were very similar for three main reasons. The leaders were Adolf Hitler and Enver Pasha. They
were both very uncaring and wanted to exterminate many different groups of people. The merciless
dehumanization of the Jews and Armenians included taking their names, homes, and belongings
away from them. The unreasonable murder tactics in both genocides included burning, shooting,
and gassing the victims. More than thirteen million people died during these two genocides and
there are some people that deny that it ever even happened. Kamberling 4 Works Cited "Adolf
Hitler Quotes." Adolf Hitler Quotes (Author of Mein Kampf). Good Reads Inc., 4 ! ! Apr. 2001.
Web. 16 May 2012. . Hui, Tongu. "QUOTES– Various Turkish Leaders." QUOTES– Various Turkish
Leaders. VBulletin Solutions, Inc., 24 Mar. 2005. Web. 10 May 2012. . Institute, Armenian National.
"Armenian Genocide." Armenian Genocide. Armenian ! ! National Institute. Web. 01 May 2012. .
Rights Council, The United Human. "Armenian Genocide." The United Human Rights ! Council.
VIBSCO. Web. 01 May 2012. . Spiegelman, Art. Maus: A Survivor's Tale. New York: Pantheon,
1986.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Armenian People During WW1
Can you imagine yourself living during the time that WWI was going on? I'm pretty sure you'd be
terrified to even walk out of your house. Like it wasn't bad enough that the whole world was at
each other's throat, but to know that your country may be at the hands of another leader. A leader
who may have different perspectives on every day life, with the benefit of doubt that it may be
extremely foreign to you, is pretty scary. I'm pretty sure that it would make you or anyone else feel
extremely unsafe and uncomfortable. But imagine being unaware of the underlying plan to
"cleanse" your ethnic group. The Armenian people faced this situation during the time of WWI. Life
between...show more content...
Others hesitated to abandon their only means of self–defense and instead, buried guns in the ground,
store them in dry wells, or hid them in their houses or barns5. This led to house–to–house searches in
some communities, with Armenians being tortured until they revealed whether they owned weapons.
On May 27, 1915, an official Edict of Deportation was issued6. For most
Armenians, the deportation orders were a complete surprise. The Armenians were in despair as they
left the villages and cities where their families had lived for many generations. When preparing for
the deportation journey, Armenians faced anguishing decisions about what to take with them, who to
go with, or even the decision of whether to leave their children behind, especially if there was a
Turkish family willing to keep him or her for her. Some Armenians faced other moral dilemmas:
that they were given the option of converting to Islam and remaining in their homes7. Very few
Armenians selected this option. In the beginning of spring of 1915, Armenians were deported from
their homes and forced to march hundreds of miles to the deserts of Syria and Mesopotamia8. This
was called "death marches"9. Along the way some were killed outright, and tens of thousands more
died of dehydration,

The Armenian Genocide Essay
The Armenian Genocide, also known as the Armenian Holocaust, the Great Calamity, and the
Armenian Massacre, was the organized killing of nearly 1.5 million Armenians. It occurred in the
Ottoman Empire – present–day Turkey – where 2 million Armenians lived. The Armenian Genocide
is the second–most studied massacre, after the Nazi Holocaust. Twenty–two countries have officially
recognized it as genocide, but the Republic of Turkey rejects the characterization of the events as
genocide. Many Armenians who are descendants of survivors are fighting for its recognition.
Under the Millet system, the Ottoman Empire did not give nearly as many rights to Armenians as to
Muslims. They couldn't serve in the military, they couldn't testify...show more content...
land, livestock, and homes included ? was to be confiscated by the authorities.
The Empire?s wartime allies offered little protest, but the New York Times called the massacres
?systematic?, ?authorized?, and ?organized by the government?.
With the passage of the Tehcir Law, all Armenians were to be disarmed, demobilized, and assigned
to labor battalions. Chetes, Ottoman squads, executed many recruits. In December of 1911 a
?special organization? was founded by the Ottoman government. Ittihad ve Terraki founded a second
special organization composed entirely of released criminals. The organizations marched Armenians
out to the Syrian town of Deir ez–Zor. They were not allowed any rest, supplies, or facilities. The
New York Times in August of 1915 stated ?The roads and the Euphrates are strewn with corpses of
exiles, and those who survive are doomed to certain death.? Troops escorting Armenians often
robbed, killed, and raped them, and encouraged others to do the same. Twenty–five major
concentration camps existed in total. Armenians were killed in large groups via mass burning,
poisoning, and drowning.
Many foreign officials offered to intervene on behalf of the Armenians, but were turned away by
Ottoman government officials. The events were reported daily in newspapers and literary journals
around the world. Many famous Americans, including Theodore Roosevelt, William Jennings Bryan,
and Alice Stone Blackwell, spoke out against the

The Armenian Genocide
Armenian Genocide
Andy Leeds
Ms. Bullis
English 1
April 24 Armenians are a Christian nation, and when they were a country, they were the first to
proclaim Christianity as the state religion. The Ottoman Empire took control of Armenia during the
15th century, and they were mistreated for quite a while due to religious differences (Christians vs.
Muslims), and this mistreatment culminated and peaked during 1915–1918. During World War I, the
Ottoman Empire took the opportunity among a world of chaos to exterminate its Christian
population, after years of hate propaganda sponsored by the government, they struck, and the
Ottoman Empire's successor denies it to this day. The Ottoman Empire divided its people decades
before the genocide; the...show more content...
Simultaneously, the Ottomans managed to eliminate the more dangerous Armenians, as the ones
that are truly violent and hateful were massacred in these miniature killings. "commisioned write
articles for publication in the Sura– yi Ummet, demonstrating that Britain was no longer pursuing
friendly policies as she had done in the past, in particular, in the 1830's and 1840's. On the contrary,
she was now inciting the Armenian, the Macedonians revolutionaries, and even the Arabs against
Turkish rule" (Unal) To the Ottomans, Britain meant Christianity, so to hear that Britain didn't want
to be allies anymore meant that Christians didn't want to be with the Ottomans either. That the
Ottomans would connect the Easter Orthodox church of the Armenians with the Protestant Church
of England, two very different sects of Christianity, is bizarre. This connection ultimately hurt the
Armenians. "The CUP was always at pains to disguise its Turkish nationalist an, by implication,
anti–Christian leanings particularly in its Ottoman–Turkish publications." (Morganthau) By hiding
the fact that they are anti–Christian, the subliminal messages attacking the subconscious are much
more effective than a conscious message. The CUP was a very effective propaganda making
machine, and very effectively caused Ottoman to be polarized into two groups, Muslim

The Armenian Genocide was a terrible atrocity that was committed against the Armenian people.
During the time the genocide took place and afterwards, there had been people who had witnessed
the tragedy that befell the Armenians and wrote poems in order to show the world what had truly
happened to their people, and to get us, the readers, the emphasize with them as well. Some poets
that highlighted the atrocious acts that happened during the Armenian genocide were Siamanto who
wrote "The Dance" and Vahan Tekeyan who wrote "Dream" and "The Country of Dust." What is the
Armenian Genocide? It is "the atrocities committed against the Armenian people of the Ottoman
Empire during W.W.I. The Armenian people were subjected to deportation,
...show more content...
/ "Dance," they thundered – / "here's a fragrance you can't get in Arabia." (59). Those who were a
part of the Ottoman empire burned Armenians without remorse. They had corpses being piled
high as trees, you could hear the loud whips being cracked and the yelling of the Ottoman
authorities to have the Armenians continue their so called 'dancing.' It was had been so horrible
to watch that at the end of the poem, the poet asks "how can I dig my eyes out?" When reading
the poem, it shows you the bloody and gruesome details of what had gone on during the Armenian
genocide. Many people might not be able to handle such a thing, but it is being told to make us all
aware of what truly happened. Some people might sugar coat it or avoid it, but when you realize
what had actually happened, it makes us feel more empathetic towards the victims and the survivors
of the genocide. It's one thing to know what happened, but to hear or read about from someone who
had experienced it is a different thing altogether. We are given the truth of what happened, we
envision what had been done and how they had endured these atrocities.
Vahan Tekeyan was another Armenian poet who was one of the few who had survived the
Armenian Genocide. During his time alive, he became a very influential person and was seen as the
'Prince of Armenian Poetry.' During his lifetime, he had published many books/poems that were
praised for its meaning. One of these poems was called "Dream," which was about

Armenia Genocide Essay
Armenia is one of the world's oldest civilizations. Inhabiting the mountainous Caucasus region at the
crossroads of Europe and Asia, the people of Armenia have shared a unique language and culture for
over 3,000 years. The systematic annihilation of the Armenian population from their historic
homeland was a horrific example to serve the upcoming genocides, including Hitler's Holocaust.
Every Armenian thinks that it is their own responsibility to honor the innocent Armenian people.
Armenian genocide is a part of the world history and every year on April 24th numerous events
take place to spread awareness and demand recognition. In addition, April 24 is a huge political
event for all the Armenians all over the world and thousands of people gather...show more content...
The Armenian Genocide was carried out during World War 1 between the years nineteen fifteen and
nineteen eighteen. It was planned and managed by the Turkish government against the entire
Armenian population of the Ottoman Empire. The mass of the Armenian population was forcibly
removed from Armenia and Anatolia to Syria, where the mass was sent into the desert to die of thirst
and hunger. Large numbers of Armenians were systematically massacred all over the Ottoman
Empire. Women and children were abducted and terribly abused. The entire wealth of the Armenian
people was confiscated. After a year of calm at the end of World War One, the slaughter was renewed
between nineteen twenty and nineteen twenty three the turks organized massacres of Armenians in
and as a result of Turkish atrocities more than one million of Armenians were slaughtered, died from
cold, hunger and epidemics, hundreds of thousands Armenians were captivated, assimilated, deported
by force from their native places (Armenocide.am). Today, most historians call this event
genocide–"a premeditated and systematic campaign to exterminate an entire people." The Armenian
people were issued to deportation, seizure, persecution, massacre, and hunger. Ordinary Armenians
were turned out of their homes and sent on death marches through the Mesopotamian desert without
food or

Write An Essay On The Armenian Genocide
Armenian Genocide Essay
Have you ever heard of the Armenian Genocide war? Let me explain to you how it all started. The
Armenian Genocide was a mass extermination of Armenians, Assyrians, and greeks carried out by
the Ottoman from 1915 until 1923. It was the first major genocide of the 20th century. During World
war I, the Turkish national government had overseen the deportations and killings of all the millions
Armenians in eastern Turkey. They had caused the beginning of the Armenian Genocide. The
Turkish national government had seen this as them being able to take over the Armenians.
The Russian government had planned to reform six Turkish provinces that were almost populated by
Armenian people/citizens. The government slowly was taking away their things such as their
weapons, they arrested many intellectuals, and they started deporting the Armenian citizens to a
concentration camps in the Syrian desert where they were starved to death or exiled. By the end of
the year 1915, 75% of the Armenian population were extinct. The Turks killed over one million
armenian citizens and other people who lived there. They made the armenians go extinct so they
could win/take over their territory. Thousands of armenians were murdered during the...show more
content...
But they still ended up getting massacred by the Turkish government. When the genocide occurred,
people were arrested and tortured. Their enemy made Armenians strip their clothes and walked
during daylight until they couldn't anymore. People were tortured and murdered. If they stopped
doing what they were doing to rest or take a break, they were shot. The special organization the
turks created was just more torture to the citizens. They were drowned, pushed off cliffs, starved to
death, exiled, or buried alive. The armenians did not deserve this because all they wanted was to
fight for independence and they end up getting assassinated in their own home and

Armenian Genocide Essay
The Armenian Genocide was one of the worst planned killings in history taking over one and half
million lives. First having disputes with the Turkish government in 1894, Turkish military officials,
soldiers and ordinary men sacked Armenian villages and cities and massacred their citizens. This is
also known as the Armenian Holocaust. Being part of a religious minority in the region the
Armenian people were seen as inferior to the Muslims and having very few political and legal
rights. Issues increased during World War One when Ottoman religious authorities began a holy war
against all christians expect their allies. Turkish military leaders began to think if the Allies won that
the Armenians would turn and fight for them. As the war continued...show more content...
The monument is a symbol of respect to the people showing the history of the Genocide and
raising the awareness around it. We did not have a target audience as the memorial is for both
people part of the genocide as well as people who want to learn about it. The pathway is lined
with birch trees on either side with white tulips in front of it. These trees show the strict control
the soldiers had as they marched the prisoners to be executed, surrounded with no way out. To the
left of the pathway is a white building with the Armenian flag embroidered on the floor. This is to
symbol patriotism and give the emotion of remorse to the people affected by the genocide.
People can pay a small fee to have their names engraved onto the stones. Outside the main
building is a garden with the flowers planted in order of the flag. The waterfalls compliment the
flowers and the walkway to give an emotion of peace and hope before entering the building. The
first one in the garden shows "never ending tears" with the lasting effect the genocide has had on
people. This is used as a prayer area for people looking to be at peace with the past. The pathway
going inside memorial symbolizes the long marches that the captured civilians would take heading
into the prisons. Inside the building after walking down the hallway you see straight ahead the
Armenian flag spanning the wall. This is shown as a

Armenian Genocide Research Paper
The political leaders of Armenia were targeted during the genocide, the loss of the Armenian leaders
left the population vulnerable and made the rebuilding of Armenian even more difficult. This
planned out tactic proves that the Armenian genocide was purposeful and thought out.
The beginning of the Armenian Genocide was marked by the murder of the political leaders of
Armenia. Leaders of the Armenian nationalist Dashnak party organization and Nazaret Chavush, the
most notable Armenian leader in Zeitun were of the first Armenian leaders to be murdered,
beginning in October 1914.
These planned killings left the Armenian's vulnerable, and without procedure while under the
extreme pressure under threat of the genocide. Following the murder of

Argumentative Essay On The Armenian Genocide
The Armenian Genocide:The Armenians are a group of people who were attacked repeatedly
throughout history, gained and lost territory, and were subject to discrimination. The highest level of
discrimination ever demonstrated is genocide. These discriminatory acts toward the Armenians first
arose after the First Balkan War of 1912 tore Europe apart and broke the bonds between previously
united countries (Cooper and Akcam par. 7). During the decline of the Ottoman Empire, Armenians
banded themselves together and fought against the Turks, Michael Gunter, a professor and author,
believes that, "This was an inevitable result of psychology on which the Armenian people had
nourished itself during an entire generation" (par. 19). Afterwards in 1915, when the genocide truly
began, the Van Rebellion and suspected collaboration with the Russian Ottomans signaled the
deportation of Armenians to Iraq. While the Armenians were in Iraq, the Turks organized killings
and death by privation, a state in which essential aspects of life such as food and warmth are lacking
(Cooper and Akcam par. 8). Within months of their arrival, the nearby Tigris and Euphrates rivers
were filled with bodies of Armenians; dysentery and other diseases became prevalent due to the
pollution of this important water source. Others who did not die or become ill due to the
contaminated water water suffered through concentration camps established by the Turks (Cohan
par. 22). Some eyewitnesses recount church burnings, mass drownings, beatings, rapes, and
mutilation. Yevnige Salibian, a 101–year old survivor, shares in 2015, "I saw the Turkish people,
long whips in their hands ... and the children were crying, 'Mama, I am hungry. I want some bread.
Mama, I am thirsty. Mama, I cannot walk'" (qtd in Gottlieb par. 1). This incident described by
Saliban has a strong correlation to what Elie Wiesel describe in the novel Night when the Nazis first
arrived in his village. Research states that by 1918 any remaining Armenians in their historic land
were either dead or in the Diaspora. From this time to 1922, Ataturk, the previous ruler of Turkey,
expelled all of the remaining Armenians (Cohan par. 23). Even though the definition of genocide
states that there is

The Armenian Genocide Essay
The Armenian genocide has several main causes: European meddling in Ottoman internal affairs,
nationalism, economic jealousy, and Armenian involvement in the Russian war effort. Though, a lot
of the causes are interrelated. For example, nationalism and European meddling go hand in hand.
What exactly was the Armenian genocide? Well, the Armenian genocide was a state orchestrated
machine of mass–murder and rape of the Armenian people, and several other ethnic groups, of the
Ottoman Empire 1915–1923. The Armenians were one of many ethnic groups of the Ottoman
Empire, and they had lived in eastern Asia Minor for around three thousand years prior to the
atrocity . The Ottoman Empire was a theocracy where the Sultan, or emperor, was also the...show
more content...
Nationalism is defined as a nation's, or ethnicities, desire to become an independent autonomous
state. The Greek, Albanian, Serbian, Bosnian, and Macedonian nations' nationalistic centrifugal
force started the break up of the Empire in mid 19th century. All of the nations listed above became
states by the time World War One began in 1914. This nationalistic movement happen under many
Sultans, but it intensified under AbdГјlhamid II and finally under Murad V. It was AbdГјlhamid II
who tried to curve the nationalistic movements, which were also sweeping through Europe, by
introducing the Tanzimat Reforms of 1834 and 1856, at the request of European pressure. The main
goal of these reforms was to move the non–Muslims from an inferior national to a full subject of the
Empire. The thought was that if the Sultan gave his minority subjects more rights, per say, than they
would not form a separatist movement. Or worse the subjects separatist movement lobby
international support; for example, in the Greek national movement in 1821. The Greeks were
assisted by France, Romanov Russia, and The United Kingdom. In this way two causes for the
Armenian genocide interweave. At the same time as nationalistic centrifugal forces are pulling the
Empire apart, Europe is sticking their hands in Ottoman internal affairs. The Tanzimat Reforms were
really a failure, and did not promote equal citizenship among citizens. Nor

Armenian Genocide Case Study
FOCUS The focus of this inquiry is the conflict between the Armenians and Turkish Government in
the 20th century between 1915–1918 and how it was caused and also if there was a resolution to this
conflict or has it continued through to modern times. INTRO The armenian genocide happened
between 1915–1918 where 1.5 million Armenians were massacred at the hands of the Turkish
government. This genocide came about in 1915 due to the muslim government threatened by the
Christian Armenians who were thriving in a society that was forced to exclude them. Suspicions
grew that the armenians were not loyal to the Muslim leaders but were loyal to other Christian
governments like Russia, who shared a border with the Turks. It was a suspicion by military

Armenian Genocide Summary
The Armenian Genocide is commonly recognized as the persecution and death of Armenian citizens
of the Ottoman Empire from 1915 to 1918, during the First World War. The Ottoman Empire, headed
by the Committee of Union and Progress, was responsible for the deaths of the Armenian population
and their migration to other countries. Many countries have been guilty of atrocities throughout the
history. Most were chastised by the world within a short period of time. This is also true of Turkey
as the new country after the fall of the Ottoman Empire. It was warned and reprehended by the UN,
the US Government and 42 American States individually (including California) as well as many
other countries of the world within 25 years of that event ().
Furthermore,...show more content...
She also claims, "Many scholars are history experts but we are not, so we have to look at all
opinions fairly." (Kiper). She might think like this because of where she comes from and where she
belongs to; a country, which refuses to label this historical event as "genocide" and the general
assumption that Turkey, should feel ashamed for doing genocide. However, it was recognized that
the government of the Ottoman Empire killed many Armenian citizens in 1915 and 1916. Thus,
anyone reading Kiper's comments might laugh at the idea that an event, which occurred over 100
years ago, can be judged, even by historians. There is no serious scholarly debate about the facts of
this historical event other than whether or not to actually call it "genocide" – justifiably doing so
has traditionally met with fierce resistance from Turkey, which was not a country at the time of the

Turkish Armenian Genocide
In cases such as the Turkish–Armenian conflict, contrary sources are available. Several sources
claim that the conflict was in fact a genocide, whilst others maintain that a mass ethnic cleansing
was never even thought of by government officials. This issue arises because of a variety of
perspectives from which historical accounts are told. However, there is physical evidence from both
the Hamidian Massacres (1894–1896) and the Adana Massacre (1909) which clearly indicate that
there was a significant and harmful attack on the Armenian people who lived within the borders of
the Ottoman Empire. Armenians were subjected to subhuman conditions in concentration camps, not
unlike those constructed by the Nazis in Germany, which included malnutrition and disease. Despite
the plethora of information regarding the Ottoman Empire's actions toward the Armenians, it is still
denied in an official capacity by the Turkish government to this day.
Unfortunately, the Turkish–Armenian conflict is not the only unacknowledged or marginalized
genocide; there are several other incidents of this happening, just in the past century. One of the most
prominent being the Rwandan Genocide, which...show more content...
As responsible members of the society, we must legally define the term genocide so that it may be
used effectively and efficiently in international courts of law, in order to hold those who do not value
human lives accountable for their actions. Genocides must also be acknowledged internationally in
order to honor those who died; continuing to disavow these mass murders or ethnic cleansings on an
international stage is an insult to those who

Armenian Genocide Report
Both articles consisted of two witnesses of the Armenian Genocide in their town. The first
eyewitness goes by the name of Zakar Kloian, who was born in 1900, in the Village of Darman, in
Turkey. He was a naturalized citizen of the United States, with a naturalization certificate issued
to him by the District Court of the United States. On May 15, 1915, all the townspeople were
kicked out of their homes from the Turkish gendarmerie. They were forced to travel on foot
towards a destination they were not familiar of. But several days later, a group of armed mobs
attacked the group of Armenians, which distracted the Turkish gendarmes from watching their
group. This made an easy opportunity for the group of Armenians to make an escape, which some
of them did. Zakar was one of those people who fled safely. The second article was also about a
woman who experienced the massacre of the Armenians. Khanum Palootzian, born in 1898, was also
from the Village of Darman....show more content...
This was a very tragic event in history especially for the Armenians. The Armenians were innocent
group of people. More than half of the population were killed. Most Armenians today want
acknowledgement for the horrible things the Turks did, but Turkey still denies it and even uses
reasons such as it was during the first World War. Despite what the Turks say, a lot of the older
Armenian survivors are still alive and telling people what horror they saw. I feel that if the United
States and other major countries of the world accept that the atrocities were done on the Armenians,
this matter would be put under a microscope and reviewed carefully. But until that day that it is
agreed upon that the genocide happened, which it did, the Armenians will keep bringing it up year
after year in the month of April during the Armenian genocide's

Since a hundred years ago, the discussion over the barbarous actions of the Ottoman Empire
murdering and deporting of its Armenian community has come down to one question. Was the
viscous acts of the Ottoman Empire considered Genocide or not? This is the real global issue that
has been debated for so long throughout the world. While the vast American–Armenian community
truly believes the word Genocide should be openly used to describe the massacre that took place a
hundred years ago, the United States has not let the word out of their mouth. Many Armenians
wonder why the United States choose not to express the G–Word when they know more than a
million Armenians were massacred during the final days of the Ottoman Empire....show more
content...
In the Realism perspective of international relations, the United States were mainly looking out for
their self–interest. While the United States would like to adopt the word of Genocide, knowing how
important it is to the American–Armenian community, they simply couldn't risk their relationship
with Turkey. Since the U.S had access to military and air bases on Turkish lands, they did not want
jeopardize their relationship with the Turks. Turkey did not want the G–word to be used and the U.S
will stand by it as long as they have interests in

I'm not as fascinated on topics of Genocide as i am on cultures and political relations.My interest in
this particular topic rose when i remember the commemoration of the Armenian genocide took
place and there was a debate on the importance of it being claimed as such or let it be ignored. I
was always to certain extent intrigued by how as a student i was taught about the Holocaust and
Rwanda when speaking about genocide but Armenia was ignored .Last year my friend asked about
a topic for her extended essay involving a genocide which wasn't the holocaust, I mentioned Armenia
and at first she didn't know what i was talking about since it wasn't common knowledge; now she is
writing her extended essay on this topic.I like to link the authoritative

Armenian Genocide: A Case Study
French government was less committed to the Armenian national cause and did not contribute a lot
to help the Armenians. Although, French did play few humanitarian roles, such as when Russian
authorities requested the French government to subsidize the relief work for Armenian refugees in
Aleppo, then French made the payment in secret to avoid the attention of CUP (Bloxham 2005,
139). French had missionaries in the Ottoman Empire that were trying to provide aid to Armenians,
but failed to do so because violence was rapidly increasing and extreme famine that resulted into
people dying of starvation. French requested the British to provide food aid, but British refused
indirectly and said that Entente Allies are simply being blackmailed to remedy

Evidence of the Armenian Genocide Essay
The Armenian genocide was a systematic eradication of the Armenian population who lived
under the Ottoman government. The genocide took place before and after World War I and it
was set out in two phases. The first phase was to kill all able bodied men by massacre and forced
labor. The second phase was to deport women, children, and the elderly and make them walk
through the Syrian Desert in which a lot of people died from lack of food, water and the climate.
The total population that had died was between one and one and a half million. Despite the high
death rates, Turkey still denies the Armenian genocide took place. The evidence that the genocide
took place is that one and a half million of Armenians died, the Armenian genocide is...show more
content...
After that, the Turks started arresting Armenian men throughout the entire country. They took the
men and they were sent to the outskirts of town. The troops then tied up the men and shot or
bayoneted them to death. After the murder of the men came the children, women and elderly. The
Turks told the women, children and elderly to pack their things so they can relocate them to a safer
area, but their real intentions were to send them out in a death march. The Armenians walked
through the Syrian Desert with lack of food and water and the weather of the Syrian Desert only
made it worse for them. Many of the Armenians did not survive the march and died. This was
planned out by the Turkish government; they brought no food or water for the Armenians and in
some instances, even killed the women, children or elderly. One million people just do not die from
starvation without the help of the government. The Turks did not try to help the starving Armenians
in their march. In the picture below, you will see evidence of women and children starving
throughout the march to the Syrian Desert. Figure 1: Starved Armenian woman with her son in
Syrian Desert, 1916. Collection of the Armenian Genocide Museum & Institute Archive– See more
at: http://www.genocide–museum.am/eng/online_exhibition_3.php#sthash.A1g3Js9s.dpuf The
National Archives – Armenian Genocide There are many historical documents, photographs, witness
reports that have been recorded and have been

The war between the Young Turks and the Armenians did not solve any problems, but rather just
further deepened tensions between countries. It started off as a war for power because the
Armenians demanded equal rights with the Turks in the government of the Ottoman Empire.
However, due to the differing religions between the two groups, the Armenians were denied of their
request as they were the minority. This lead the Turks to form a committee, the Committee of
Union and Progress (CUP), to reach a compromise with the Armenians so they could all live
together in peace. However, out of fear that they would take over, the Young Turks completely
disregarded this plan and decided to slaughter them by the thousands because they posed a slight
threat. This increased tensions between opposing races and opposing countries since their Allies,
such as Germany, would also be expected to take the side of the Turks and deny the brutality of the
events that took place....show more content...
On this historic day, also known as Remembrance Day, the Armenian people lead a march up an
extensive hill to the memorial of those who died in the genocide. The people sport shirts of various
colors and symbols, some with slogans relating to the genocide such as, "forget–me–not." Many
stores and attractions are closed on this day to observe the holiday and there are flyers and signs
put up to advertise events going on around the city in honor of the country. Contrary to most, this
march was a peaceful one filled with numerous people with one common goal at hand, to honor
their fellow friends and family members who died tragically during the genocide and raise
awareness toward the reality of the

Armenian Genocide Essay

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais de Paper Writing Service Cheap

Mais de Paper Writing Service Cheap (20)

Último

Último (20)

Armenian Genocide Essay