Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Nj complete streets oct 2013 gary toth
1. Rightsizing Streets aka Road Diets
Gary Toth
Project for Public Spaces
NJ Complete Streets Summit
October 21, 2013
2. 34 years at the New Jersey Department of Transportation
6 Years Director of Transportation Initiatives at PPS
Invested Career working at the community/agency interface
2
3. We shape our streets, thereafter
our streets shape us. –adapted from Winston Churchill
Contrasting 1
4. We have been Building Transportation Through Communities,
not communities through transportation
Slide courtesy of Dan Burden
17. Slide courtesy of Dan Burden
This:
Pottstown PA
One less travel lane; bike lanes; parallel to back-in
This 5-lane Main Street was converted to…
diagonal parking on one side; new pavement
PROJECT FOR PUBLIC SPACES
21. Crash Rate
14.0
12.6
Crash Rate (per MVM)
12.0
34% Reduction
10.0
8.4
8.0
6.0
4.0
1 crash every
2.5 days
(146 per yr)
1 crash every
4.2 days
(87 per yr)
2.0
0.0
Before
After
22. Injury Rate
4.0
3.6
Injury Rate (per MVM)
3.5
3.0
68% Reduction
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
1 injury every
9 days
(41 per yr)
0.5
0.0
1.2
1 injury every
30 days
(12 per yr)
Before
After
23. Percent of Vehicles Traveling over 36 MPH
Speeding Analysis
35.0%
29.5%
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
19.6%
15.7%
15.0%
7.5%
10.0%
9.8%
8.9%
Before
After
5.0%
0.0%
Before
After
North End
Middle
Before
After
South End
32. Pine and Spruce Streets
Philadelphia
PROJECT FOR PUBLIC SPACES
33. Pine and Spruce Streets
Philadelphia
• 44% decline in reportable crashes
• 34% decline in crashes resulting in a trip to the
hospital
• 58% decline in pedestrian crashes
• No change in number of car trips
• Bike trips doubled
• Mean car speed stayed the same
• Top range of speeds dropped
PROJECT FOR PUBLIC SPACES
34. PPS Rightsizing Web Resource
http://www.pps.org/reference/rightsizing/
PROJECT FOR PUBLIC SPACES
35. What Are We Learning from
Rightsizing Streets Case Studies
36. Some Roads May Be More Safe
with Less Space for Cars?
PROJECT FOR PUBLIC SPACES
44. Streets as Places Finishes the Job of
Rightsizing
Reallocate
Street Space (aka Complete Streets)
Streets as Places!
PROJECT FOR PUBLIC SPA
45. Complete Streets
An Approach for Accomodating All Users
Cars
Pedestrians
Bikes
Buses
Trucks/freight
Alignment + Cross-Section + Intersection + Roadside
PROJECT FOR PUBLIC SPACES
46. Traditional Highway Design Approach
Traffic Volume + Area Type (urban, rural) + Role in Network
Functional Classification
Design Speed + Design Vehicle
Alignment + Cross-Section + Intersection + Roadside
48. PROJECT FOR PUBLIC SPACES
Made possible by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services through the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health.
49. “Lowly, unpurposeful and
random as they may appear,
sidewalk contacts are the small
change from which a city’s
wealth of public life may grow”.
─ Jane Jacobs
{"49":"People have been designed out of many of our urban areas. These men would be considered loiterers if standing next to one of the above columns.\n","50":"In our 30 years of work, we have found that people have never really lost their craving for great civic gathering spaces. People flock to civic spaces when they want to be with other people, to share ideas or become part of the collective expression of an idea or point of view. Uptown Waterloo’s public square has the potential to become such a great civic place and destination for the people of this City. As a parking lot, it’s opportunity to become a defining place for the city is quite limited. However, in either case, the space needs to be carefully planned and designed. But more than that, to be successful it must e actively programmed and managed on an ongoing basis and funds need to be set aside for that purpose NOW. That is why most if not all public spaces fail to realize their potential. Why parks sit empty; while plazas in the middle of busy commercial districts are unused except by skateboarders and the homeless; if you build it they will come, only if there is something to do there and a comfortable place to sit while you do it!\n","17":"There are many possibilities; a typical 5-lane can be converted to (next slide)\n","45":"Key Message: \nThis is the traditional engineering approach to roadway design. It shows very little relationship to land use context.\nBackground Information: \nThe engineer starts out by looking at existing or forecast traffic volume, the type of area the road is in, and its role in the highway network –through route vs. local route, degree of access control desired, etc.\nThese characteristics are used to develop a formal functional classification for the road. General classifications include freeways, major arterials, minor arterials, collector streets, and local roads. There are divisions of these categories for urban and rural.\nThe functional classification is used to establish the design speed and design vehicle. For example, freeways and rural arterials may be assigned a design speed of 55 mph or more. An urban collector street may be assigned a design speed of 25 to 35 mph. Design vehicle is basically whether the road is designed to readily accommodate large trucks or buses.\nThe design speed and vehicle lead to physical requirements or guidelines for alignment, cross-section, intersection design, and roadside treatment. For example, to allow a car to safely travel at 55 mph, a curve must be a certain radius. The radius may need to be greater if the design vehicle is larger. Cross-section elements include lane widths, shoulder widths, medians, and sidewalks. Examples of roadside elements include maximum sideslope and clear zone for obstacles.\nInteractivity: \nAsk: In what ways, if any, does this approach relate a street’s design to its land use context?\nThe only relation to land use is whether it is urban or rural\nNotes:\n","46":"Key Message: \nThis is the traditional engineering approach to roadway design. It shows very little relationship to land use context.\nBackground Information: \nThe engineer starts out by looking at existing or forecast traffic volume, the type of area the road is in, and its role in the highway network –through route vs. local route, degree of access control desired, etc.\nThese characteristics are used to develop a formal functional classification for the road. General classifications include freeways, major arterials, minor arterials, collector streets, and local roads. There are divisions of these categories for urban and rural.\nThe functional classification is used to establish the design speed and design vehicle. For example, freeways and rural arterials may be assigned a design speed of 55 mph or more. An urban collector street may be assigned a design speed of 25 to 35 mph. Design vehicle is basically whether the road is designed to readily accommodate large trucks or buses.\nThe design speed and vehicle lead to physical requirements or guidelines for alignment, cross-section, intersection design, and roadside treatment. For example, to allow a car to safely travel at 55 mph, a curve must be a certain radius. The radius may need to be greater if the design vehicle is larger. Cross-section elements include lane widths, shoulder widths, medians, and sidewalks. Examples of roadside elements include maximum sideslope and clear zone for obstacles.\nInteractivity: \nAsk: In what ways, if any, does this approach relate a street’s design to its land use context?\nThe only relation to land use is whether it is urban or rural\nNotes:\n","47":"Key Message:\nNetwork and corridor-level planning can help set the context for addressing more specific street design issues.\nBackground Information:\nNetwork planning can occur as part of the regional and community-level visioning and planning processes, as discussed in Lessons 5 and 8. The design of the network (connectivity, spacing of arterials, etc.) has implications for the design of individual roadway segments. \nNetwork level solutions – for example, where major traffic routes go in relationship to activity centers – are the first step in establishing street-land use compatibility.\nCorridor visioning and planning, as discussed in Lesson 6, determines how a community wants a corridor to develop. It may include conceptual plans for street cross-sections and local road networks. \nRoadway design includes three distinct aspects – the traveled way, intersections, and the roadside (e.g., sidewalks and planting strips)\nInteractivity:\nNotes:\nAdapted from: Institute of Transportation Engineers (2006). Context Sensitive Solutions in Designing Major Urban Thoroughfares for Walkable Communities: A Proposed Recommended Practice. RP-036. Washington, D.C.\n","48":"…by putting themselves, and the going and staying needs of their bodies, in streets!\n"}