1. Writing to communicate, communicating to collaborate, collaborating to learn PHD- concept and first ‘results’ 16.02.10 Michele Notari University of Teacher Education [email_address]
2. Writing to communicate , communicating to collaborate, collaborating to learn PHD- concept and first ‘results’ 16.02.10
3.
4.
5. A different approach: User centered ‚design ‘ 16.02.10 Michele Notari The green ‚button‘ : Xerox-Park
6. Analysis of learners needs / learners behaviour: focus on ‚computer supported written communication‘ 16.02.10 Michele Notari In a Project based Learning setting
12. Need for: Preliminary investigation for CMWC- and CSCL – Studies: 16.02.10 Michele Notari Two Indicators for the capability to ‚write down thoughts with a keyboard interface‘: Typing efficiency Content quality and
15. Visualizing typing speed 16.02.10 Michele Notari : michele.notari@phbern.ch Characters in the textbody Keys pressed Time in seconds Amount of keys / characers
Interacting in CMC and CSCL mostly happens with a keyboard as interface
Preliminary investigation for CMWC- and CSCL - Studies First article in: Annotations and the collaborative digital library… International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning : An Official Publication of the International Society of the Learning Sciences Second article in: Group awareness and self-presentation in computer-supported information exchange … International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: An Official Publication of the International Society of the Learning Sciences:
Effizienz richtiges in nützlicher Zeit! Warum 0.003 Typical sectretary speed: typing secretary (3 Secretaries) with german texts.. All sectretaries wrote the same text..
Figure 5: Box Plot of typing efficiency and content quality indicators. The range of the latter is wider. Maximums normalized as value 1