End-of-project report given during the eSkwela Turnover Ceremonies - transferring eSkwela's reins from the Commission on ICT to DepEd for regular operations as an institutionalized delivery mode of ALS' Accreditation and Equivalency (A&E) Program.
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
eSkwela report - turnover ceremonies (29 April 2011)
1. Project Overview 2006-2011 Maria Melizza D. Tan eSkwela PM, Commission on ICT Turnover Ceremonies * 29 April 2011
2.
3. CICT's ICT4E: Comprehensive Approach (Infra: only for pilot) Future-Gov Government Technology Awards 2009 – Digital Inclusion + Philippine ICT Awards for Digital Inclusion by the CIO Forum UNESCO Certificate of Commendation – ICT in Education Innovation Awards 2007-2008 AND Hon orable Mention at the 2010 UNESCO King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa Prize for the Use of ICT in Education Jeepney ni JanJan : Outstanding Client Application of the Year for Game Development in eServices 2010 by DTI Educators Training Applications Dev Content Dev Infrastructure Deployment Elem eSchools: pipeline HS ALS Tertiary & Community
8. PROJECT options: letter, article, photo essay multimedia video, recorded interview, song, radio play, brochure, blog, wiki, Google Group, ning, Facebook, YouTube, etc. Module Guides LINKS TO WEBSITES FORUM / WIKI & TESTS FORUM
9. Enhanced Content Development Process Alpha Review Beta Review (Reviewers) Turnover of Sources Alpha Production Alpha Revisions Beta Revisions Certification Distribution Storyboards & Scripts Production Storyboards & Scripts Review Concept & Theme Workshop Beta Review (Learners)
14. PHYSICAL TARGETS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS (based on the Project LogFrame) as of 29 April 2011 target accomplished slippage Functional customized ICT4E (ALS) Instructional model Enhanced Framework 1 1 0% eModules & corresponding Module Guides (A&E) developedv (to be used for free) 283 207 (148 of which have been certified by BALS) 27% eModules (others: livelihood & CILC) developed (to be used for free) 61 10 84% Mature/Replicable center model eSkwela Franchise Manual 1 (beta version) 40% Roadshows conducted for advocacy 17 27 0% Operational sites (mostly community initiated) 106 90 + 15 15% Trained/qualified implementers on prescribed instructional model and center operations Training Designs 7 7 0% Trained field implementers 1,884 1,718 9% Established management and M&E mechanisms and tools Mechanisms 4 4 0% Automated Systems 2 2 0%
15.
16.
17. a beacon of hope... ~ served an estimated 4,700 learners since 2007
iSchools = 360 + 320 + 320 eSkwela = has 21 Centers with targeted 220++ by 2010 Content Development = TLE, IPs, culture and arts, Animation, English Proficiency for 4 th year students Most of the HCD projects: in cooperation with SUCs of the eQuality Program since CICT-HCDG has no local presence maximizes local tie-ups since these beneficiary communities are the feeder schools of the SUCs eQuality Program – 71 of 111 SUCs – 37 are active partners for the iSchools Project CeCs = Community eCenters – physical centers that broaden ICT access to the people Regional ICT Centers – to be incubated in the SUCs, to work closely with CICT and RITECCs Meant to provide the needed ICT expertise (consultancy, development, incubation, etc.) and capability-building needs of the region
eSkwela is not just about the e-learning modules. Let me clarify that. It covers several components: Infra to be sourced by the community either from scratch or through a shared facility like an internet café or a school laboratory or a Community eCenter computers (desktops or laptops or netbooks) can number anywhere from 4 to 20 (or even 40); internet connection which is important as you will see in the instructional model, space, utilities, fixtures The customized instructional model which will be explained on the next slide – this covers the module guides, e-modules, and the learning management system We require that the learning facilitators are trained both in ALS and eSkwela – they should foremost be ALS implementers and computer users. Training is crucial as is handholding throughout the implementation phase – e-learning is not something that you just learn in a few days, it’s a habit that you need to internalize. Monitoring and evaluation is likewise essential – primarily because we want to look into the good practices as well as the challenges so that we could offer our assistance or learn from these Community support is crucial primarily for sustainability – the community must “own and love” the project – may be financial sustainability (utilities, space, etc.) or providing “big brother” support to learners or tying them up with community activities, even PESO activities – may be LGU, NGO, civic org, individuals
a means for “transformed lives”: towards a “better me” and a brighter future
Major strategies employed by the project team: Cautious expansion – we wanted to make sure that the centers would be more or less ready enough to implement the project, given that it has several components to look into Multi-stakeholder approach – we always believed in the power of synergy and community ownership Inclusive / consultative and collaborative efforts… - we have always involved BALS, the implementers, and other stakeholders in the things that we decide on and do; any recommendations for enhancement go through a cycle of consultation Capability building among stakeholders – it is essential in making sure that the implementers would have an understanding of what eSkwela is all about and what to actually do; handholding is likewise highly encouraged Experts tapped – we admit that we do not know nor can do everything; and as mentioned, we believe in the power of synergy in bringing eSkwela to life Openness, flexibility, experimentation – we believe in continuous enhancement and learning from others