When analyzing the Gartner Top 25 using the Supply Chains to Admire methodology, we find that:
75% underperformed on growth
29% underperformed on margin
42% underperformed on inventory turns
2. Comparison Gartner Top 25 Supply Chains to Admire™
Focus Fortune Global 500 and Forbes 2000 lists.
15$B minimum annual revenue. (roughly 300 companies)
All public companies by analyzed by industry
peer groups. 440 companies by 28 peer
groups. No revenue minimum.
No limit on the number of winners peer group.
Likewise, there may be no winner by industry.
Analysis 2018-2020 2011-2020
Calculation 50% Opinion: (Equally split between analyst and peer voting)
50% Quantitative Analysis:.
1, Return on Plant Assets (ROPA): ((2020 operating income / 2020 net property, plant,
equipment + year-end inventory)) *50%) + ((2019 operating income / 2019 net
property, plant, equipment + year-end inventory)) *30%) + ((2018 operating income /
2018 net property, plant, equipment + year-end inventory)) *20%). (20%)
2. Inventory (Average for 2018-2020) 5%
3. Revenue Growth: ((change in revenue 2020-2019) *50%) + ((change in revenue
2019-2018) *30%) + ((change in revenue 2018-2017) *20%). (10%)
4. ESG Component Score: Index of third-party environmental, social and governance
measures of commitment, transparency and performance.
Improvement: Top 2/3 ranking on the Supply
Chain Index.
Performance: At or above the industry mean
for:
• Year-over-year revenue growth.
• Operating margin.
• Inventory turns.
• Return on Invested Capital (ROIC).
Value: At or above the mean for Price-to-
Tangible Book or Market Capitalization.
Index Calculations: https://www.slideshare.net/loracecere/sci-summit-2014-math-behind-sc-
index?qid=27326733-0325-4ee7-aacd-e2827bd216de&v=&b=&from_search=11
History 17th Year 8th Year
Methodology Comparison: Gartner Top 25 and Supply Chains to Admire
3. Supply Chains to Admire
Data-driven
Comparison to Peer Group
Long View
3
Comparison
5. 5
Gartner Top 25
Comparison to Peer
Group for 2011-2020
• 75% underperformed
on growth
• 29% underperformed
on margin
• 42% underperformed
on inventory turns