SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 34
Prepared By
Konark Kambli.
Population: 41,000
Households: 13,500
Median Age: 35
Median Income: $36,000
CentraliaDemographics
$725 M$62.3M$59.4M
4.6% increase
FOODANDBEVERAGEMARKET 2002 SALES
Superior
Harrison’s
Missouri
Mart
Grand
American
Competitors
Missouri Mart
2002 Sales
$16,821,000
Size
120,000Sq.ft.
Target Audience
Middle
Aged/Older
Families with
$30,000 income
Harrison’s
2002 Sales
$13,706,000
Size
50,000Sq.ft.
Target
Audience
Upper/ Middle
income groups
Grand
American
2002 Sales
$8,099,000
Size
39,800Sq.ft.
Secondary
Competitor
KEY FACTS
Limited Variety of Merchandise
Lower Advertising Budget than
Competitors
Highest prices in Centralia
Highest Quality Groceries & Produce
SUPERIORINFORMATION
North Fairview
West Main
South Prospect
SUPERIORINFORMATION
Superior’s Centralia Locations
2002
Centralia Store
Sales:
$14,326,700
2002
Gross Profit
Margin:
28.8%
($4,126,089)
2002
Cost of Goods
Sold:
$10,200,611
SUPERIORINFORMATION
% OF TOTAL 2002 SALES OF $14,326,700
SUPERIORINFORMATION
GROCERY
50
%
52
%
PRODUCE
18%
19%
MEAT&
FISH
20
%
12%
GENERAL
MERCHANDISE
7%
8%
BAKERY
5%
9%
% OF TOTAL 2002 GROSS PROFIT MARGIN OF $4,127,522
Superior
23%
Harrison’s
22%
Grand
American
13%
Missouri
Mart
27%
Others 15%
MarketShare
Over 30% of
people feel that
Superior has
high prices
Customers place
importance on
1. Price
2. Quality
3. Convenience
Image
Disconnect:
“Superior
Supermarket =
Superior Value”
ConsumerResearch
33.8%:
Customers
aged 35-49
35%
Visit 2x a
week
77.9%
Regular
customers
for 3 years
of more
83.7%
Purchase
50% of
food
from
Superior
36.9%
Shop
Grocery
Only
42.3%
Shop in
Dairy
CONSUMER SHOPPING PREFERENCES
Store Choice Determinants at
four major food stores (in descending order)
SUPERIOR GRAND
AMERICAN
MISSOURI
MART
HARRISON’S
1.PRICE High prices More reasonable
than Superior
Reasonable Best overall
reasonable prices.
2.MEAT
QUALITY
Poor Poor Lowest quality Best quality/variety
3.QUALITY,
VARIETY,
DISPLAY
Best Shopping
Convenience
Out of stock
items. Best store
layout
Offers greatest
variety
“the produce store”
(highest
quality/variety)
4.SHOPPING
CONVENIENCE
Best shopping
convenience
Less Convenient Poor Service best quality service
Situational Analysis
• EVERYDAY LOW PRICING:
• 1. Superior’s Prices high, higher consumer price awareness
• 2. Risk of loss in Superior’s Market Share
Randall
Johnson
• Everyday Low Pricing success mixed, Strategy works better as a
broader store positioning strategy, supported with Advertising.
• Not necessary to be lowest priced Supermarket in trade area
• ELP must be used in all trade area stores to prevent image/positioning
confusion.
VP of Retail
Operations/
James Ellis
• EVERYDAY LOW PRICING – POTENTIAL TO REDUCE
OPERATING COSTS:
• 1. Reduction in Inventory/Handling Costs
• 2. Reduction in Labor Costs
Controller for
Superior
SWOTANALYSIS
STRENGTHS
SWOT
Analysis
SWOTANALYSIS
STRENGTHS
Over 30 years of experience
Higher quality of products
3 Convenient Locations
More stores in operation
2002 Gross Margin above Industry
average
SWOTANALYSIS
STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
SWOT
Analysis
SWOTANALYSIS
WEAKNESSES
Smaller Store Size
Less Variety
Small advertising budget
High prices compared to competitors
Geographical area
Lack of consumer image
SWOTANALYSIS
STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
OPPORTUNITIES
SWOT
Analysis
SWOTANALYSIS OPPORTUNITIES
Increase number of customers
from Centralia
Store Expansion
Offer More Variety
Change Displays
Improve Pricing Strategy
SWOTANALYSIS
STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
OPPORTUNITIES THREATS
SWOT
Analysis
SWOTANALYSIS
THREATS
Loss of Market Share
Loss of current customers
Lower Prices at Competitors
Increasing Customer Price
Awareness
SWOT Summary
Superior Supermarket, with over 30 yrs of experience, is the 2nd
largest market share holder (23%), among its competitors. It has 3
conveniently situated store locations in Centralia. It offers high quality
products and great shopping convenience.
On the downside, Superior has a smaller store size in comparison to
its competitors and offers a smaller variety at higher prices.
Many opportunities are available to Superior for purpose of
increasing profit margin. Superior can look to expand store size, offer
greater variety, increase the number of Centralia shoppers, improve
store displays, and change the Pricing Strategy.
Superior Supermarket faces the following threats : loss in market
share if pricing strategy is not changed, loss in current customers,
lower prices at competitor stores, and an increase in price awareness
among customer base.
Options to consider (if ELP is
implemented):
 Few shoppers had specific product or brand price
awareness (Usually, Category dependent).
 “Should this Strategy be implemented across-the-
board (for all products) or just certain categories of
products?”
 “How much should the prices be lowered?”
Superior Current Pricing
% of Sales Sales GPM Gross Profit Cost of Goods Sold
Centalia Stores 100% 14,236,700.00$ 28.8% 4,101,593.27$ 10,135,106.73$
Grocery 50% 7,118,350.00$ 30.0% 2,135,505.00$ 4,982,845.00$
Fresh Meat 20% 2,847,340.00$ 18.0% 512,521.20$ 2,334,818.80$
Produce 18% 2,562,606.00$ 30.0% 768,781.80$ 1,793,824.20$
Gen MDSE 7% 996,569.00$ 33.0% 328,867.77$ 667,701.23$
Bakery 5% 711,835.00$ 50.0% 355,917.50$ 355,917.50$
4,101,593.27$ 10,135,106.73$
Current Pricing Structure
Lower Price On General MDSE
and Grocery
Sales COGS Profit
Current 7,118,350.00$ 4,982,845.00$ 2,135,505.00$
GPM 30.00%
Lower 7 % 6,620,065.50$ 4,982,845.00$ 1,637,220.50$
GPM 24.73%
Need to Match 8,634,868.04$ 6,499,363.04$ 2,135,505.00$
GPM 24.73%
Grocery
Sales COGS Profit
Current 996,569.00$ 667,701.23$ 328,867.77$
GPM 33.00%
Lower 7 % 926,809.17$ 667701.23 259,107.94$
GPM 27.96%
Need to Match 1,176,334.72$ 847,466.95$ 328,867.77$
GPM 27.96%
General MDSE
•Must increase sales of General
MDSE by 18% to achieve same
Gross Profit
•Must Increase sales of Grocery’s
by 21.3% to attain same gross
profit.
New Pricing Structure
 Lowers cost of General MDSE and Grocery 7%
 Lowers GPM to 25.85% from 28.8% for the store and
gross profit to $3,533,548 from $4,101,593.
 To retain same gross profit, stores must achieve Sales
of 15,866,898, and increase of 11.5%
% of Sales Sales GPM Gross Profit Cost of Goods Sold
Grocery 48% 6,620,065.50$ 25% 1,637,220.50$ 4,982,845.00$
Fresh Meat 21% 2,847,340.00$ 18% 512,521.20$ 2,334,818.80$
Produce 19% 2,562,606.00$ 30% 768,781.80$ 1,793,824.20$
Gen MDSE 7% 926809.17 28% 259,107.94$ 667,701.23$
Bakery 5% 711,835.00$ 50% 355,917.50$ 355,917.50$
Centralia Stores 100% 13,668,655.67$ 25.85% 3,533,548.94$ 10,135,106.73$
Lower prices in grocery and general--7%
Lower all Prices
 Lowers GPM to 23.45% from 28.8% and lowers Gross
Profit to $3,105,024 from $4,101,593.
 To Retain Gross Profit, stores must achieve sales of
17,489,599 or a 22.8% increase
% of Sales Revenue Gross Profit Cost of Goods Sold
Grocery 50% 6,620,065.50$ 25% 1,637,220.50$ 4,982,845.00$
Fresh Meat 20% 2,648,026.20$ 12% 313,207.40$ 2,334,818.80$
Produce 18% 2,383,223.58$ 25% 589,399.38$ 1,793,824.20$
Gen MDSE 7% 926,809.17$ 28% 259,107.94$ 667,701.23$
Bakery 5% 662,006.55$ 46% 306,089.05$ 355,917.50$
Centralia Stores 100% 13,240,131.00$ 23.45% 3,105,024.27$ 10,135,106.73$
Lower All Prices--7%
FEASIBLESOLUTIONS
DO NOTHING
DEPARTMENTAL
PRICE
REDUCTION
CHANGE THE
CURRENT
MARKETING
STRATEGY
COMPLETE
STORE PRICE
REDUCTION
Do Nothing
 Superior is already positioned well in Centralia
market.
 Superior Value
 Consistent year over year growth over past three years.
 Instead focus should be on quality control.
 Customers have seen differences in departments as far as
quality in the three different stores.
 Need to provide same product at all three locations.
Superior super market case study analysis

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

FINAL MARKETING PLAN
FINAL MARKETING PLAN FINAL MARKETING PLAN
FINAL MARKETING PLAN
Meghan Brieck
 
FOOD TRUCK PPT NEW
FOOD TRUCK PPT NEWFOOD TRUCK PPT NEW
FOOD TRUCK PPT NEW
Archana Raja
 

Mais procurados (20)

wholefood market (case no. 7)
wholefood market (case no. 7)wholefood market (case no. 7)
wholefood market (case no. 7)
 
FINAL MARKETING PLAN
FINAL MARKETING PLAN FINAL MARKETING PLAN
FINAL MARKETING PLAN
 
MA40 Shopee Philippines place and promotions
MA40 Shopee Philippines place and promotionsMA40 Shopee Philippines place and promotions
MA40 Shopee Philippines place and promotions
 
Marketing Plan for Curt's Cafe by KickASE Marketing Roosevelt University
Marketing Plan for Curt's Cafe by KickASE Marketing Roosevelt UniversityMarketing Plan for Curt's Cafe by KickASE Marketing Roosevelt University
Marketing Plan for Curt's Cafe by KickASE Marketing Roosevelt University
 
Sample of Business Plan
Sample of Business PlanSample of Business Plan
Sample of Business Plan
 
COSTCO Case Study.ppt
COSTCO Case Study.pptCOSTCO Case Study.ppt
COSTCO Case Study.ppt
 
Case Study: Costco Wholesale in 2008: Mission, Business Model & Strategy
Case Study:  Costco Wholesale in 2008: Mission, Business Model & Strategy Case Study:  Costco Wholesale in 2008: Mission, Business Model & Strategy
Case Study: Costco Wholesale in 2008: Mission, Business Model & Strategy
 
Grocery store business plan | Entrepreneurship Business Idea | Grocery Store ...
Grocery store business plan | Entrepreneurship Business Idea | Grocery Store ...Grocery store business plan | Entrepreneurship Business Idea | Grocery Store ...
Grocery store business plan | Entrepreneurship Business Idea | Grocery Store ...
 
1 Retail Strategy
1 Retail Strategy1 Retail Strategy
1 Retail Strategy
 
Business Proposal & Proof of Concept for a Restaurant for a Leading Shopping ...
Business Proposal & Proof of Concept for a Restaurant for a Leading Shopping ...Business Proposal & Proof of Concept for a Restaurant for a Leading Shopping ...
Business Proposal & Proof of Concept for a Restaurant for a Leading Shopping ...
 
Business proposal noodles shop
Business proposal noodles shopBusiness proposal noodles shop
Business proposal noodles shop
 
Restaurant business plan
Restaurant business planRestaurant business plan
Restaurant business plan
 
Market Analysis
Market Analysis Market Analysis
Market Analysis
 
Hypermarket
HypermarketHypermarket
Hypermarket
 
FOOD TRUCK PPT NEW
FOOD TRUCK PPT NEWFOOD TRUCK PPT NEW
FOOD TRUCK PPT NEW
 
Final presentation
Final presentationFinal presentation
Final presentation
 
Marketing Research about Buying Behavior of Ukay2x Patronizers
Marketing Research about Buying Behavior of Ukay2x PatronizersMarketing Research about Buying Behavior of Ukay2x Patronizers
Marketing Research about Buying Behavior of Ukay2x Patronizers
 
Starbucks coffee
Starbucks coffeeStarbucks coffee
Starbucks coffee
 
principle of marketing "Bara sAft" JUICE project
principle of marketing "Bara sAft"  JUICE projectprinciple of marketing "Bara sAft"  JUICE project
principle of marketing "Bara sAft" JUICE project
 
best buy case study sample presentation
 best buy case study sample presentation best buy case study sample presentation
best buy case study sample presentation
 

Semelhante a Superior super market case study analysis

Costco- Management Case Analysis; Consulting
Costco- Management Case Analysis; ConsultingCostco- Management Case Analysis; Consulting
Costco- Management Case Analysis; Consulting
Kate Ammerman
 

Semelhante a Superior super market case study analysis (20)

Natureview Farm Case Study
Natureview Farm Case StudyNatureview Farm Case Study
Natureview Farm Case Study
 
Natureview Farm Harvard Case Study
Natureview Farm Harvard Case StudyNatureview Farm Harvard Case Study
Natureview Farm Harvard Case Study
 
Natureview
NatureviewNatureview
Natureview
 
Natureview Farm Harvard Case Analysis
Natureview Farm Harvard Case AnalysisNatureview Farm Harvard Case Analysis
Natureview Farm Harvard Case Analysis
 
Case Study on Natureview Farm
Case Study on Natureview FarmCase Study on Natureview Farm
Case Study on Natureview Farm
 
Nature View farm
Nature View farmNature View farm
Nature View farm
 
Costco- Management Case Analysis; Consulting
Costco- Management Case Analysis; ConsultingCostco- Management Case Analysis; Consulting
Costco- Management Case Analysis; Consulting
 
Case 2 natureview farm case study by soumya jaiswal,nitrr
Case 2   natureview farm case study by soumya jaiswal,nitrrCase 2   natureview farm case study by soumya jaiswal,nitrr
Case 2 natureview farm case study by soumya jaiswal,nitrr
 
Natureview farm case study
Natureview farm case studyNatureview farm case study
Natureview farm case study
 
Nature view farm_case_study
Nature view farm_case_studyNature view farm_case_study
Nature view farm_case_study
 
Natureview farm case study
Natureview farm case studyNatureview farm case study
Natureview farm case study
 
Natureview case study analysis
Natureview case study analysisNatureview case study analysis
Natureview case study analysis
 
Natureview farm - Analysis
Natureview farm - AnalysisNatureview farm - Analysis
Natureview farm - Analysis
 
Natureview farm
Natureview farmNatureview farm
Natureview farm
 
Nature view farm
Nature view farmNature view farm
Nature view farm
 
Natureview Farm - HBR Case Study
Natureview Farm - HBR Case StudyNatureview Farm - HBR Case Study
Natureview Farm - HBR Case Study
 
Natureview farm case study
Natureview farm case studyNatureview farm case study
Natureview farm case study
 
NATUREVIEW FARM CASE STUDY
NATUREVIEW  FARM CASE STUDYNATUREVIEW  FARM CASE STUDY
NATUREVIEW FARM CASE STUDY
 
Natureview farm
Natureview farm Natureview farm
Natureview farm
 
Natureview Farm Case Analysis
Natureview Farm Case AnalysisNatureview Farm Case Analysis
Natureview Farm Case Analysis
 

Último

RATINGS OF EACH VIDEO FOR UNI PROJECT IWDSFODF
RATINGS OF EACH VIDEO FOR UNI PROJECT IWDSFODFRATINGS OF EACH VIDEO FOR UNI PROJECT IWDSFODF
RATINGS OF EACH VIDEO FOR UNI PROJECT IWDSFODF
CaitlinCummins3
 
zidauu _business communication.pptx /pdf
zidauu _business  communication.pptx /pdfzidauu _business  communication.pptx /pdf
zidauu _business communication.pptx /pdf
zukhrafshabbir
 
What is paper chromatography, principal, procedure,types, diagram, advantages...
What is paper chromatography, principal, procedure,types, diagram, advantages...What is paper chromatography, principal, procedure,types, diagram, advantages...
What is paper chromatography, principal, procedure,types, diagram, advantages...
srcw2322l101
 

Último (20)

Raising Seed Capital by Steve Schlafman at RRE Ventures
Raising Seed Capital by Steve Schlafman at RRE VenturesRaising Seed Capital by Steve Schlafman at RRE Ventures
Raising Seed Capital by Steve Schlafman at RRE Ventures
 
Global Internal Audit Standards 2024.pdf
Global Internal Audit Standards 2024.pdfGlobal Internal Audit Standards 2024.pdf
Global Internal Audit Standards 2024.pdf
 
Inside the Black Box of Venture Capital (VC)
Inside the Black Box of Venture Capital (VC)Inside the Black Box of Venture Capital (VC)
Inside the Black Box of Venture Capital (VC)
 
RATINGS OF EACH VIDEO FOR UNI PROJECT IWDSFODF
RATINGS OF EACH VIDEO FOR UNI PROJECT IWDSFODFRATINGS OF EACH VIDEO FOR UNI PROJECT IWDSFODF
RATINGS OF EACH VIDEO FOR UNI PROJECT IWDSFODF
 
8 Questions B2B Commercial Teams Can Ask To Help Product Discovery
8 Questions B2B Commercial Teams Can Ask To Help Product Discovery8 Questions B2B Commercial Teams Can Ask To Help Product Discovery
8 Questions B2B Commercial Teams Can Ask To Help Product Discovery
 
The Truth About Dinesh Bafna's Situation.pdf
The Truth About Dinesh Bafna's Situation.pdfThe Truth About Dinesh Bafna's Situation.pdf
The Truth About Dinesh Bafna's Situation.pdf
 
zidauu _business communication.pptx /pdf
zidauu _business  communication.pptx /pdfzidauu _business  communication.pptx /pdf
zidauu _business communication.pptx /pdf
 
1Q24_EN hyundai capital 1q performance
1Q24_EN   hyundai capital 1q performance1Q24_EN   hyundai capital 1q performance
1Q24_EN hyundai capital 1q performance
 
A Brief Introduction About Jacob Badgett
A Brief Introduction About Jacob BadgettA Brief Introduction About Jacob Badgett
A Brief Introduction About Jacob Badgett
 
WAM Corporate Presentation May 2024_w.pdf
WAM Corporate Presentation May 2024_w.pdfWAM Corporate Presentation May 2024_w.pdf
WAM Corporate Presentation May 2024_w.pdf
 
Guide to Networking Essentials 8th Edition by Greg Tomsho solution manual.doc
Guide to Networking Essentials 8th Edition by Greg Tomsho solution manual.docGuide to Networking Essentials 8th Edition by Greg Tomsho solution manual.doc
Guide to Networking Essentials 8th Edition by Greg Tomsho solution manual.doc
 
What is paper chromatography, principal, procedure,types, diagram, advantages...
What is paper chromatography, principal, procedure,types, diagram, advantages...What is paper chromatography, principal, procedure,types, diagram, advantages...
What is paper chromatography, principal, procedure,types, diagram, advantages...
 
PitchBook’s Guide to VC Funding for Startups
PitchBook’s Guide to VC Funding for StartupsPitchBook’s Guide to VC Funding for Startups
PitchBook’s Guide to VC Funding for Startups
 
HAL Financial Performance Analysis and Future Prospects
HAL Financial Performance Analysis and Future ProspectsHAL Financial Performance Analysis and Future Prospects
HAL Financial Performance Analysis and Future Prospects
 
Daftar Rumpun, Pohon, dan Cabang Ilmu (2024).pdf
Daftar Rumpun, Pohon, dan Cabang Ilmu (2024).pdfDaftar Rumpun, Pohon, dan Cabang Ilmu (2024).pdf
Daftar Rumpun, Pohon, dan Cabang Ilmu (2024).pdf
 
Exploring-Pipe-Flanges-Applications-Types-and-Benefits.pptx
Exploring-Pipe-Flanges-Applications-Types-and-Benefits.pptxExploring-Pipe-Flanges-Applications-Types-and-Benefits.pptx
Exploring-Pipe-Flanges-Applications-Types-and-Benefits.pptx
 
Copyright: What Creators and Users of Art Need to Know
Copyright: What Creators and Users of Art Need to KnowCopyright: What Creators and Users of Art Need to Know
Copyright: What Creators and Users of Art Need to Know
 
Toyota Kata Coaching for Agile Teams & Transformations
Toyota Kata Coaching for Agile Teams & TransformationsToyota Kata Coaching for Agile Teams & Transformations
Toyota Kata Coaching for Agile Teams & Transformations
 
بروفايل شركة ميار الخليج للاستشارات الهندسية.pdf
بروفايل شركة ميار الخليج للاستشارات الهندسية.pdfبروفايل شركة ميار الخليج للاستشارات الهندسية.pdf
بروفايل شركة ميار الخليج للاستشارات الهندسية.pdf
 
MichaelStarkes_UncutGemsProjectSummary.pdf
MichaelStarkes_UncutGemsProjectSummary.pdfMichaelStarkes_UncutGemsProjectSummary.pdf
MichaelStarkes_UncutGemsProjectSummary.pdf
 

Superior super market case study analysis

  • 2. Population: 41,000 Households: 13,500 Median Age: 35 Median Income: $36,000 CentraliaDemographics
  • 5. Missouri Mart 2002 Sales $16,821,000 Size 120,000Sq.ft. Target Audience Middle Aged/Older Families with $30,000 income
  • 8. KEY FACTS Limited Variety of Merchandise Lower Advertising Budget than Competitors Highest prices in Centralia Highest Quality Groceries & Produce SUPERIORINFORMATION
  • 9. North Fairview West Main South Prospect SUPERIORINFORMATION
  • 12. % OF TOTAL 2002 SALES OF $14,326,700 SUPERIORINFORMATION GROCERY 50 % 52 % PRODUCE 18% 19% MEAT& FISH 20 % 12% GENERAL MERCHANDISE 7% 8% BAKERY 5% 9% % OF TOTAL 2002 GROSS PROFIT MARGIN OF $4,127,522
  • 14. Over 30% of people feel that Superior has high prices Customers place importance on 1. Price 2. Quality 3. Convenience Image Disconnect: “Superior Supermarket = Superior Value” ConsumerResearch
  • 15. 33.8%: Customers aged 35-49 35% Visit 2x a week 77.9% Regular customers for 3 years of more 83.7% Purchase 50% of food from Superior 36.9% Shop Grocery Only 42.3% Shop in Dairy CONSUMER SHOPPING PREFERENCES
  • 16. Store Choice Determinants at four major food stores (in descending order) SUPERIOR GRAND AMERICAN MISSOURI MART HARRISON’S 1.PRICE High prices More reasonable than Superior Reasonable Best overall reasonable prices. 2.MEAT QUALITY Poor Poor Lowest quality Best quality/variety 3.QUALITY, VARIETY, DISPLAY Best Shopping Convenience Out of stock items. Best store layout Offers greatest variety “the produce store” (highest quality/variety) 4.SHOPPING CONVENIENCE Best shopping convenience Less Convenient Poor Service best quality service
  • 17. Situational Analysis • EVERYDAY LOW PRICING: • 1. Superior’s Prices high, higher consumer price awareness • 2. Risk of loss in Superior’s Market Share Randall Johnson • Everyday Low Pricing success mixed, Strategy works better as a broader store positioning strategy, supported with Advertising. • Not necessary to be lowest priced Supermarket in trade area • ELP must be used in all trade area stores to prevent image/positioning confusion. VP of Retail Operations/ James Ellis • EVERYDAY LOW PRICING – POTENTIAL TO REDUCE OPERATING COSTS: • 1. Reduction in Inventory/Handling Costs • 2. Reduction in Labor Costs Controller for Superior
  • 19. SWOTANALYSIS STRENGTHS Over 30 years of experience Higher quality of products 3 Convenient Locations More stores in operation 2002 Gross Margin above Industry average
  • 21. SWOTANALYSIS WEAKNESSES Smaller Store Size Less Variety Small advertising budget High prices compared to competitors Geographical area Lack of consumer image
  • 23. SWOTANALYSIS OPPORTUNITIES Increase number of customers from Centralia Store Expansion Offer More Variety Change Displays Improve Pricing Strategy
  • 25. SWOTANALYSIS THREATS Loss of Market Share Loss of current customers Lower Prices at Competitors Increasing Customer Price Awareness
  • 26. SWOT Summary Superior Supermarket, with over 30 yrs of experience, is the 2nd largest market share holder (23%), among its competitors. It has 3 conveniently situated store locations in Centralia. It offers high quality products and great shopping convenience. On the downside, Superior has a smaller store size in comparison to its competitors and offers a smaller variety at higher prices. Many opportunities are available to Superior for purpose of increasing profit margin. Superior can look to expand store size, offer greater variety, increase the number of Centralia shoppers, improve store displays, and change the Pricing Strategy. Superior Supermarket faces the following threats : loss in market share if pricing strategy is not changed, loss in current customers, lower prices at competitor stores, and an increase in price awareness among customer base.
  • 27. Options to consider (if ELP is implemented):  Few shoppers had specific product or brand price awareness (Usually, Category dependent).  “Should this Strategy be implemented across-the- board (for all products) or just certain categories of products?”  “How much should the prices be lowered?”
  • 28. Superior Current Pricing % of Sales Sales GPM Gross Profit Cost of Goods Sold Centalia Stores 100% 14,236,700.00$ 28.8% 4,101,593.27$ 10,135,106.73$ Grocery 50% 7,118,350.00$ 30.0% 2,135,505.00$ 4,982,845.00$ Fresh Meat 20% 2,847,340.00$ 18.0% 512,521.20$ 2,334,818.80$ Produce 18% 2,562,606.00$ 30.0% 768,781.80$ 1,793,824.20$ Gen MDSE 7% 996,569.00$ 33.0% 328,867.77$ 667,701.23$ Bakery 5% 711,835.00$ 50.0% 355,917.50$ 355,917.50$ 4,101,593.27$ 10,135,106.73$ Current Pricing Structure
  • 29. Lower Price On General MDSE and Grocery Sales COGS Profit Current 7,118,350.00$ 4,982,845.00$ 2,135,505.00$ GPM 30.00% Lower 7 % 6,620,065.50$ 4,982,845.00$ 1,637,220.50$ GPM 24.73% Need to Match 8,634,868.04$ 6,499,363.04$ 2,135,505.00$ GPM 24.73% Grocery Sales COGS Profit Current 996,569.00$ 667,701.23$ 328,867.77$ GPM 33.00% Lower 7 % 926,809.17$ 667701.23 259,107.94$ GPM 27.96% Need to Match 1,176,334.72$ 847,466.95$ 328,867.77$ GPM 27.96% General MDSE •Must increase sales of General MDSE by 18% to achieve same Gross Profit •Must Increase sales of Grocery’s by 21.3% to attain same gross profit.
  • 30. New Pricing Structure  Lowers cost of General MDSE and Grocery 7%  Lowers GPM to 25.85% from 28.8% for the store and gross profit to $3,533,548 from $4,101,593.  To retain same gross profit, stores must achieve Sales of 15,866,898, and increase of 11.5% % of Sales Sales GPM Gross Profit Cost of Goods Sold Grocery 48% 6,620,065.50$ 25% 1,637,220.50$ 4,982,845.00$ Fresh Meat 21% 2,847,340.00$ 18% 512,521.20$ 2,334,818.80$ Produce 19% 2,562,606.00$ 30% 768,781.80$ 1,793,824.20$ Gen MDSE 7% 926809.17 28% 259,107.94$ 667,701.23$ Bakery 5% 711,835.00$ 50% 355,917.50$ 355,917.50$ Centralia Stores 100% 13,668,655.67$ 25.85% 3,533,548.94$ 10,135,106.73$ Lower prices in grocery and general--7%
  • 31. Lower all Prices  Lowers GPM to 23.45% from 28.8% and lowers Gross Profit to $3,105,024 from $4,101,593.  To Retain Gross Profit, stores must achieve sales of 17,489,599 or a 22.8% increase % of Sales Revenue Gross Profit Cost of Goods Sold Grocery 50% 6,620,065.50$ 25% 1,637,220.50$ 4,982,845.00$ Fresh Meat 20% 2,648,026.20$ 12% 313,207.40$ 2,334,818.80$ Produce 18% 2,383,223.58$ 25% 589,399.38$ 1,793,824.20$ Gen MDSE 7% 926,809.17$ 28% 259,107.94$ 667,701.23$ Bakery 5% 662,006.55$ 46% 306,089.05$ 355,917.50$ Centralia Stores 100% 13,240,131.00$ 23.45% 3,105,024.27$ 10,135,106.73$ Lower All Prices--7%
  • 33. Do Nothing  Superior is already positioned well in Centralia market.  Superior Value  Consistent year over year growth over past three years.  Instead focus should be on quality control.  Customers have seen differences in departments as far as quality in the three different stores.  Need to provide same product at all three locations.

Notas do Editor

  1. 1. Price – most important store choice determinant 2. Meat Quality – Quality/display of meat, department cleanliness, and reasonable bargains 3. Produce quality, variety, and display - determine a quality store image 4. Shopping Convenience – ease of getting into and out of store lots, quick checkout, carryout service, well-stocked and orderly shelves, closeness to home/work and helpful store personnel.