SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 34
1
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
11
Enabling Youth Inquiry through
Citizen Science
EVALUATION/RESEARCH OVERVIEW
May 2013
University of Minnesota, Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve
Evaluation Team: Kim Kies, Nathan Meyer, Pam Larson Nippolt,
Siri Scott, Andrea Lorek Strauss, Katie Smiley
Acknowledgments
The Driven to Discover project is supported, in part, by a grant
from the National Science Foundation.
3
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
AGENDA
►Research purpose/evaluation approach
►Snapshot of evaluation results to date
►Discuss instruments/procedures
4
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
OVERARCHING GOALS
To engage individuals
working with youth in
Informal Science
Education settings in
Citizen Science, AND
to encourage
authentic inquiry in
this engagement.
Oberhauser 2010
5
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
2 PHASES
1. Youth leader/youth/scientist research
teams engage in youth-initiated research
based on involvement in CS programs
focused on monarch butterflies or birds.
2. Disseminate model to broader audiences
of youth leaders and citizen science
practitioners.
Oberhauser 2010
6
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
3 PREMISES
1. Engagement in authentic inquiry leads to
important science education outcomes.
2. Citizen Science is an engaging, effective setting
for learning science content & methods (~40% of
Monarch Larvae Monitoring Program volunteers
monitor with youth).
3. Integrating authentic inquiry into Citizen Science
programs will benefit the practice of Citizen
Science and Informal Science Education in
general.
Oberhauser 2010
7
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
YOUTH CHARACTERISTICS:
8
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
YOUTH GENDER
29%
71%
Male Female
39%
61%
Male Female
2010 2011 2012
Male 20 43 55
Female 48 67 70
• Percentage of male participants
increased slightly each year
44%
56%
Male Female
9
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
YOUTH AGE
• The largest proportion of youth are between the ages of 9 and 13.
• 28% of Year 2 youth and 23% of Year 3 youth were returning
participants
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
N
u
m
b
e
r
Age
2010
2011
2012
The Number of Youth by Age and Year
10
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
YOUTH ATTITUDES (2012)
 73% of youth coming into the program agree
that they can contribute to a citizen science
project, but only 56% say they consider
themselves a citizen scientist.
 78% of youth coming into the program are
interested in answering their own questions
about nature.
 33% had participated in a citizen science project
before. Of those, 26% participated through prior
D2D involvement and 7% another project.
11
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
YOUTH ATTENDANCE AND EXPERIENCE (2012)
Youth Attendance Ratings
% Youth
All of the time. I was at every
meeting.
44%
More than half of the time. I
missed a few meetings.
49%
About half of the time. I missed
about half of the meetings.
3%
Less than half of the time. I
missed more than half of the
meetings.
4%
• 73% of youth would like to
participate in the research
club again, 26% were
unsure and 1% did not want
to participate again.
• 74% said they enjoyed the
program a lot; 23% a
moderate amount; and 3%
said a little.
12
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
YOUTH KNOWLEDGE (2012 PRE-POST
PROGRAM COMPARISON)
43.0%
90.0%
59.0%
80.0%
93.0%
74.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Heard of citizen
science before?
Heard of hypothesis
before?
Heard of the
scientific process
before?
Pre
Post
13
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
How often do you watch birds or
butterflies?
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
Pre
post
How often do you try to identify the
bird or butterflies you see
outdoors?
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
Pre
Post
YOUTH 2012 PRE AND POST PROGRAM
BEHAVIORS
14
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
YOUTH RATED SKILLS: 2012 PRE PROGRAM
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%
Finding organisms and their habitats
Observing organisms and their
habitats
Identifying organisms
Using scientific instruments
Using a field guide
Filling out data sheets
Very skilled Moderately skilled A little skilled Not skilled
15
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
YOUTH RATED SKILLS: 2012 POST PROGRAM
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%
Finding organisms and their habitats
Observing organisms and their
habitats
Identifying organisms
Using scientific instruments
Using a field guide
Filling out data sheets
Very skilled Moderately skilled A little skilled Not skilled
16
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
YOUTH RATED SKILLS: 2012 PRE PROGRAM
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
Asking a question that can be answered by
collecting data.
Developing testable hypotheses.
Designing a scientific procedure to answer a
question.
Creating graphs that help me and others
understand my data.
creating a display to communicate my data and
observations.
Analyzing the results of a scientific investigation.
Using the results of my investigation to answer
the question that I asked.
Very skilled Moderately skilled A little skilled Not skilled
17
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
YOUTH RATED SKILLS: 2012 POST PROGRAM
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Asking a question that can be answered by
collecting data.
Developing testable hypotheses.
Designing a scientific procedure to answer a
question.
Creating graphs that help me and others
understand my data.
creating a display to communicate my data and
observations.
Analyzing the results of a scientific investigation.
Using the results of my investigation to answer
the question that I asked.
Very skilled Moderately skilled A little skilled Not skilled
18
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
EVALUATION PROCEDURES
19
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
OVERVIEW
 We will ask you to complete / participate in…
– Assessments / Surveys
– Group phone / conference calls
– Attendance forms
– Observations with selected teams
– Focus Groups with adult leaders
 We will ask for your help…
– Youth enrollment / consents
– Youth assessments
20
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
EVALUATION STEPS OVERVIEW
1. Complete and send the consent forms to Grant Bowers (D2D
Program Coordinator).
2. Complete and send youths’ completed pre-assessments and
reporting sheet.
3. Have fun! Do your projects! / Complete Attendance sheet. /
Participate in phone conference calls.
4. Complete and send youths’ completed post-
assessments, reporting sheet, and attendance sheet.
5. Attend the D2D summit / Adult leader focus groups.
6. Complete troop leader surveys.
21
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
PARENT/YOUTH CONSENT
1. Parents complete enrollment/consent
forms (Voluntary)
2. Inform youth about the
research/evaluation process
3. Youth complete consent forms
(Voluntary)
4. Youth complete code sheet
22
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
PARENT/YOUTH CONSENT
 Send the consent forms and youth code sheets in the
pre-stamped and addressed envelope to:
Grant Bowers
University of Minnesota
1980 Folwell Ave
200 Hodson Hall
St. Paul, MN 55108
P: 612.625.8304
F: 612.625.5299
bowe0182@umn.edu
23
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
ADULT LEADER ASSESSMENTS
 Pre-program adult leader assessments: will be
administered through SurveyMonkey. A link will only be
sent to new leaders.
 Post-training assessments: if attending, will be
completed on paper directly after the training.)
 Post-program adult leader assessments will be
administered through SurveyMonkey. A link will be sent
to your email after we receive the youth assessments or
after the summit if you plan to attend.)
24
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
YOUTH ASSESSMENTS
 First and last meeting; dedicate 30 minutes
 Give plenty of time
 Provide a comfortable space for writing
 Let youth know that there are no correct / incorrect
answers
 Encourage them to fill it out completely (especially open-
ended questions)
 Make sure the youth complete the questions on their
own.
 Complete the survey at the meeting. Do not send the
surveys home with the youth to complete.
25
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
YOUTH PRE-ASSESSMENTS
 Administer prior to or at the first meeting before you
begin your activities.
 Put all the youth pre-assessment material into the self-
addressed stamped envelope provided in your
evaluation packet. Be sure to include the following:
– Reporting Sheet
– Youth Pre-Assessments
 Seal the envelope and put it where you will remember to
send it in the mail the next day.
 Send the assessment in the mail the day after your
meeting.
26
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
YOUTH PRE PROGRAM REPORTING SHEET
27
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
YOUTH PRE ASSESSMENT
28
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
YOUTH POST-ASSESSMENTS
 Administer after your team activities are completed.
 Put all the youth post-assessment material into the self-
addressed stamped envelope provided in your
evaluation packet. Be sure to include the following:
– Reporting Sheet
– Youth Post-Assessments
– Attendance forms
 Seal the envelope and put it where you will remember to
send it in the mail the next day.
 Send the assessment in the mail the day after your
meeting.
29
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
YOUTH POST ASSESSMENT REPORTING SHEET
30
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
YOUTH POST ASSESSMENT
31
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
ATTENDANCE FORM
32
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
ADULT LEADER GROUP PHONE / CONFERENCE CALLS
The program will offer Bi-weekly conference calls
for adult leaders to connect and discuss various
items. Conference call information will be shared
in bi-weekly E-zines. The calls offer the means:
 To disseminate useful information
 For adult leaders to ask questions
 For seasoned adult leaders to offer insight
 For adult leaders to share successes
33
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
ADULT FOCUS GROUPS
 Adult leader focus groups will be
scheduled the first evening of the D2D
Summit / Insect Fair (November or
December 2013 -date to be decided).
34
© 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
QUESTIONS?

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Destaque (12)

MATALLIOTAKI, E., (2012). Resolution of Division Problems by Young Children:...
MATALLIOTAKI, E., (2012).  Resolution of Division Problems by Young Children:...MATALLIOTAKI, E., (2012).  Resolution of Division Problems by Young Children:...
MATALLIOTAKI, E., (2012). Resolution of Division Problems by Young Children:...
 
Perfil político dos candidatos goianis nas eleições de 2014
Perfil político dos candidatos goianis nas eleições de 2014Perfil político dos candidatos goianis nas eleições de 2014
Perfil político dos candidatos goianis nas eleições de 2014
 
Ley 2421 04_juan fleitas
Ley 2421 04_juan fleitasLey 2421 04_juan fleitas
Ley 2421 04_juan fleitas
 
Crime vs population
Crime vs populationCrime vs population
Crime vs population
 
Hotel Urbano para Android - Dev + Design
Hotel Urbano para Android - Dev + DesignHotel Urbano para Android - Dev + Design
Hotel Urbano para Android - Dev + Design
 
Atlas prospectif-FR
Atlas prospectif-FRAtlas prospectif-FR
Atlas prospectif-FR
 
The transparent organisation (P8)
The transparent organisation (P8)The transparent organisation (P8)
The transparent organisation (P8)
 
Impactos sociais das políticas públicas Neoliberais e Pós-Neoliberais
Impactos sociais das políticas públicas Neoliberais e Pós-NeoliberaisImpactos sociais das políticas públicas Neoliberais e Pós-Neoliberais
Impactos sociais das políticas públicas Neoliberais e Pós-Neoliberais
 
Oms aims 2014 informe sistema de salud mental en chile
Oms aims 2014 informe sistema de salud mental en chileOms aims 2014 informe sistema de salud mental en chile
Oms aims 2014 informe sistema de salud mental en chile
 
Trabalho de zoologia ii
Trabalho de zoologia iiTrabalho de zoologia ii
Trabalho de zoologia ii
 
Dia europa loures
Dia europa louresDia europa loures
Dia europa loures
 
Here There Be Turtles: Platform Ops in Public Cloud
Here There Be Turtles: Platform Ops in Public CloudHere There Be Turtles: Platform Ops in Public Cloud
Here There Be Turtles: Platform Ops in Public Cloud
 

Semelhante a D2 d evaluation overview 2013 4 30-13

Annual Report_1516(1)
Annual Report_1516(1)Annual Report_1516(1)
Annual Report_1516(1)Lexy Parsons
 
How Distance Learners Will Shape Student Affairs Practice on Tomorrow’s Campus
How Distance Learners Will Shape Student Affairs Practice on Tomorrow’s CampusHow Distance Learners Will Shape Student Affairs Practice on Tomorrow’s Campus
How Distance Learners Will Shape Student Affairs Practice on Tomorrow’s CampusLeslie Dare
 
Congressional Briefing (Students & Parents)
Congressional Briefing (Students & Parents)Congressional Briefing (Students & Parents)
Congressional Briefing (Students & Parents)Julie Evans
 
2-kinds-and-importance-of-research.pptx
2-kinds-and-importance-of-research.pptx2-kinds-and-importance-of-research.pptx
2-kinds-and-importance-of-research.pptxJenniferApollo
 
powerpoint presentation on our researches
powerpoint presentation on our researchespowerpoint presentation on our researches
powerpoint presentation on our researchesLovelyVeniaJoven2
 
Race to the Top Presentation on Integrated Units
Race to the Top Presentation on Integrated UnitsRace to the Top Presentation on Integrated Units
Race to the Top Presentation on Integrated UnitsArch Grieve
 
Assessing the Co-Curricular Needs of Distance Learners: A Student Affairs Per...
Assessing the Co-Curricular Needs of Distance Learners: A Student Affairs Per...Assessing the Co-Curricular Needs of Distance Learners: A Student Affairs Per...
Assessing the Co-Curricular Needs of Distance Learners: A Student Affairs Per...Leslie Dare
 
NICE Monthly Webinar - January 2012
NICE Monthly Webinar - January 2012NICE Monthly Webinar - January 2012
NICE Monthly Webinar - January 2012danieloostra
 
Study on How College Students Update their knowledge on Current Affairs
Study on How College Students Update their knowledge on Current AffairsStudy on How College Students Update their knowledge on Current Affairs
Study on How College Students Update their knowledge on Current AffairsMuhammed Anaz PK
 
RSD_0910_Presentation.ppt
RSD_0910_Presentation.pptRSD_0910_Presentation.ppt
RSD_0910_Presentation.pptMadhu507505
 
Authentic learning and emerging technologies final
Authentic learning and emerging technologies finalAuthentic learning and emerging technologies final
Authentic learning and emerging technologies finalVivienne Bozalek
 
Cannon ace 2016 presentation slideshare
Cannon ace 2016 presentation slideshareCannon ace 2016 presentation slideshare
Cannon ace 2016 presentation slidesharekcannon2
 
Complexity and Chaos in remote schools
Complexity and Chaos in remote schoolsComplexity and Chaos in remote schools
Complexity and Chaos in remote schoolsjohn_c_guenther
 
Final Presentation.pptx
Final Presentation.pptxFinal Presentation.pptx
Final Presentation.pptxBitheyBolivar1
 
Highlights forsurveyadministratorsfinal2010
Highlights forsurveyadministratorsfinal2010Highlights forsurveyadministratorsfinal2010
Highlights forsurveyadministratorsfinal2010Jonathan Nessan
 
MLW14 UNESCO - US Panel on Best Practices and Lessons Learned
MLW14 UNESCO - US Panel on Best Practices and Lessons Learned MLW14 UNESCO - US Panel on Best Practices and Lessons Learned
MLW14 UNESCO - US Panel on Best Practices and Lessons Learned Shawn Gross
 

Semelhante a D2 d evaluation overview 2013 4 30-13 (20)

Welcome overview nfi 14
Welcome overview nfi 14Welcome overview nfi 14
Welcome overview nfi 14
 
Annual Report_1516(1)
Annual Report_1516(1)Annual Report_1516(1)
Annual Report_1516(1)
 
How Distance Learners Will Shape Student Affairs Practice on Tomorrow’s Campus
How Distance Learners Will Shape Student Affairs Practice on Tomorrow’s CampusHow Distance Learners Will Shape Student Affairs Practice on Tomorrow’s Campus
How Distance Learners Will Shape Student Affairs Practice on Tomorrow’s Campus
 
Congressional Briefing (Students & Parents)
Congressional Briefing (Students & Parents)Congressional Briefing (Students & Parents)
Congressional Briefing (Students & Parents)
 
2-kinds-and-importance-of-research.pptx
2-kinds-and-importance-of-research.pptx2-kinds-and-importance-of-research.pptx
2-kinds-and-importance-of-research.pptx
 
Rahul patil project
Rahul patil projectRahul patil project
Rahul patil project
 
A Quiet Crisis
A Quiet CrisisA Quiet Crisis
A Quiet Crisis
 
powerpoint presentation on our researches
powerpoint presentation on our researchespowerpoint presentation on our researches
powerpoint presentation on our researches
 
Race to the Top Presentation on Integrated Units
Race to the Top Presentation on Integrated UnitsRace to the Top Presentation on Integrated Units
Race to the Top Presentation on Integrated Units
 
Assessing the Co-Curricular Needs of Distance Learners: A Student Affairs Per...
Assessing the Co-Curricular Needs of Distance Learners: A Student Affairs Per...Assessing the Co-Curricular Needs of Distance Learners: A Student Affairs Per...
Assessing the Co-Curricular Needs of Distance Learners: A Student Affairs Per...
 
NICE Monthly Webinar - January 2012
NICE Monthly Webinar - January 2012NICE Monthly Webinar - January 2012
NICE Monthly Webinar - January 2012
 
Study on How College Students Update their knowledge on Current Affairs
Study on How College Students Update their knowledge on Current AffairsStudy on How College Students Update their knowledge on Current Affairs
Study on How College Students Update their knowledge on Current Affairs
 
RSD_0910_Presentation.ppt
RSD_0910_Presentation.pptRSD_0910_Presentation.ppt
RSD_0910_Presentation.ppt
 
Authentic learning and emerging technologies final
Authentic learning and emerging technologies finalAuthentic learning and emerging technologies final
Authentic learning and emerging technologies final
 
Cannon ace 2016 presentation slideshare
Cannon ace 2016 presentation slideshareCannon ace 2016 presentation slideshare
Cannon ace 2016 presentation slideshare
 
The interface between research and policy experience of South Korea
The interface between research and policy experience of South KoreaThe interface between research and policy experience of South Korea
The interface between research and policy experience of South Korea
 
Complexity and Chaos in remote schools
Complexity and Chaos in remote schoolsComplexity and Chaos in remote schools
Complexity and Chaos in remote schools
 
Final Presentation.pptx
Final Presentation.pptxFinal Presentation.pptx
Final Presentation.pptx
 
Highlights forsurveyadministratorsfinal2010
Highlights forsurveyadministratorsfinal2010Highlights forsurveyadministratorsfinal2010
Highlights forsurveyadministratorsfinal2010
 
MLW14 UNESCO - US Panel on Best Practices and Lessons Learned
MLW14 UNESCO - US Panel on Best Practices and Lessons Learned MLW14 UNESCO - US Panel on Best Practices and Lessons Learned
MLW14 UNESCO - US Panel on Best Practices and Lessons Learned
 

D2 d evaluation overview 2013 4 30-13

  • 1. 1 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. 11 Enabling Youth Inquiry through Citizen Science EVALUATION/RESEARCH OVERVIEW May 2013 University of Minnesota, Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve Evaluation Team: Kim Kies, Nathan Meyer, Pam Larson Nippolt, Siri Scott, Andrea Lorek Strauss, Katie Smiley
  • 2. Acknowledgments The Driven to Discover project is supported, in part, by a grant from the National Science Foundation.
  • 3. 3 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. AGENDA ►Research purpose/evaluation approach ►Snapshot of evaluation results to date ►Discuss instruments/procedures
  • 4. 4 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. OVERARCHING GOALS To engage individuals working with youth in Informal Science Education settings in Citizen Science, AND to encourage authentic inquiry in this engagement. Oberhauser 2010
  • 5. 5 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. 2 PHASES 1. Youth leader/youth/scientist research teams engage in youth-initiated research based on involvement in CS programs focused on monarch butterflies or birds. 2. Disseminate model to broader audiences of youth leaders and citizen science practitioners. Oberhauser 2010
  • 6. 6 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. 3 PREMISES 1. Engagement in authentic inquiry leads to important science education outcomes. 2. Citizen Science is an engaging, effective setting for learning science content & methods (~40% of Monarch Larvae Monitoring Program volunteers monitor with youth). 3. Integrating authentic inquiry into Citizen Science programs will benefit the practice of Citizen Science and Informal Science Education in general. Oberhauser 2010
  • 7. 7 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. YOUTH CHARACTERISTICS:
  • 8. 8 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. YOUTH GENDER 29% 71% Male Female 39% 61% Male Female 2010 2011 2012 Male 20 43 55 Female 48 67 70 • Percentage of male participants increased slightly each year 44% 56% Male Female
  • 9. 9 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. YOUTH AGE • The largest proportion of youth are between the ages of 9 and 13. • 28% of Year 2 youth and 23% of Year 3 youth were returning participants 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 N u m b e r Age 2010 2011 2012 The Number of Youth by Age and Year
  • 10. 10 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. YOUTH ATTITUDES (2012)  73% of youth coming into the program agree that they can contribute to a citizen science project, but only 56% say they consider themselves a citizen scientist.  78% of youth coming into the program are interested in answering their own questions about nature.  33% had participated in a citizen science project before. Of those, 26% participated through prior D2D involvement and 7% another project.
  • 11. 11 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. YOUTH ATTENDANCE AND EXPERIENCE (2012) Youth Attendance Ratings % Youth All of the time. I was at every meeting. 44% More than half of the time. I missed a few meetings. 49% About half of the time. I missed about half of the meetings. 3% Less than half of the time. I missed more than half of the meetings. 4% • 73% of youth would like to participate in the research club again, 26% were unsure and 1% did not want to participate again. • 74% said they enjoyed the program a lot; 23% a moderate amount; and 3% said a little.
  • 12. 12 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. YOUTH KNOWLEDGE (2012 PRE-POST PROGRAM COMPARISON) 43.0% 90.0% 59.0% 80.0% 93.0% 74.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Heard of citizen science before? Heard of hypothesis before? Heard of the scientific process before? Pre Post
  • 13. 13 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. How often do you watch birds or butterflies? 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% Pre post How often do you try to identify the bird or butterflies you see outdoors? 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% Pre Post YOUTH 2012 PRE AND POST PROGRAM BEHAVIORS
  • 14. 14 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. YOUTH RATED SKILLS: 2012 PRE PROGRAM 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% Finding organisms and their habitats Observing organisms and their habitats Identifying organisms Using scientific instruments Using a field guide Filling out data sheets Very skilled Moderately skilled A little skilled Not skilled
  • 15. 15 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. YOUTH RATED SKILLS: 2012 POST PROGRAM 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% Finding organisms and their habitats Observing organisms and their habitats Identifying organisms Using scientific instruments Using a field guide Filling out data sheets Very skilled Moderately skilled A little skilled Not skilled
  • 16. 16 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. YOUTH RATED SKILLS: 2012 PRE PROGRAM 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Asking a question that can be answered by collecting data. Developing testable hypotheses. Designing a scientific procedure to answer a question. Creating graphs that help me and others understand my data. creating a display to communicate my data and observations. Analyzing the results of a scientific investigation. Using the results of my investigation to answer the question that I asked. Very skilled Moderately skilled A little skilled Not skilled
  • 17. 17 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. YOUTH RATED SKILLS: 2012 POST PROGRAM 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Asking a question that can be answered by collecting data. Developing testable hypotheses. Designing a scientific procedure to answer a question. Creating graphs that help me and others understand my data. creating a display to communicate my data and observations. Analyzing the results of a scientific investigation. Using the results of my investigation to answer the question that I asked. Very skilled Moderately skilled A little skilled Not skilled
  • 18. 18 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. EVALUATION PROCEDURES
  • 19. 19 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. OVERVIEW  We will ask you to complete / participate in… – Assessments / Surveys – Group phone / conference calls – Attendance forms – Observations with selected teams – Focus Groups with adult leaders  We will ask for your help… – Youth enrollment / consents – Youth assessments
  • 20. 20 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. EVALUATION STEPS OVERVIEW 1. Complete and send the consent forms to Grant Bowers (D2D Program Coordinator). 2. Complete and send youths’ completed pre-assessments and reporting sheet. 3. Have fun! Do your projects! / Complete Attendance sheet. / Participate in phone conference calls. 4. Complete and send youths’ completed post- assessments, reporting sheet, and attendance sheet. 5. Attend the D2D summit / Adult leader focus groups. 6. Complete troop leader surveys.
  • 21. 21 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. PARENT/YOUTH CONSENT 1. Parents complete enrollment/consent forms (Voluntary) 2. Inform youth about the research/evaluation process 3. Youth complete consent forms (Voluntary) 4. Youth complete code sheet
  • 22. 22 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. PARENT/YOUTH CONSENT  Send the consent forms and youth code sheets in the pre-stamped and addressed envelope to: Grant Bowers University of Minnesota 1980 Folwell Ave 200 Hodson Hall St. Paul, MN 55108 P: 612.625.8304 F: 612.625.5299 bowe0182@umn.edu
  • 23. 23 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. ADULT LEADER ASSESSMENTS  Pre-program adult leader assessments: will be administered through SurveyMonkey. A link will only be sent to new leaders.  Post-training assessments: if attending, will be completed on paper directly after the training.)  Post-program adult leader assessments will be administered through SurveyMonkey. A link will be sent to your email after we receive the youth assessments or after the summit if you plan to attend.)
  • 24. 24 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. YOUTH ASSESSMENTS  First and last meeting; dedicate 30 minutes  Give plenty of time  Provide a comfortable space for writing  Let youth know that there are no correct / incorrect answers  Encourage them to fill it out completely (especially open- ended questions)  Make sure the youth complete the questions on their own.  Complete the survey at the meeting. Do not send the surveys home with the youth to complete.
  • 25. 25 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. YOUTH PRE-ASSESSMENTS  Administer prior to or at the first meeting before you begin your activities.  Put all the youth pre-assessment material into the self- addressed stamped envelope provided in your evaluation packet. Be sure to include the following: – Reporting Sheet – Youth Pre-Assessments  Seal the envelope and put it where you will remember to send it in the mail the next day.  Send the assessment in the mail the day after your meeting.
  • 26. 26 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. YOUTH PRE PROGRAM REPORTING SHEET
  • 27. 27 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. YOUTH PRE ASSESSMENT
  • 28. 28 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. YOUTH POST-ASSESSMENTS  Administer after your team activities are completed.  Put all the youth post-assessment material into the self- addressed stamped envelope provided in your evaluation packet. Be sure to include the following: – Reporting Sheet – Youth Post-Assessments – Attendance forms  Seal the envelope and put it where you will remember to send it in the mail the next day.  Send the assessment in the mail the day after your meeting.
  • 29. 29 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. YOUTH POST ASSESSMENT REPORTING SHEET
  • 30. 30 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. YOUTH POST ASSESSMENT
  • 31. 31 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. ATTENDANCE FORM
  • 32. 32 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. ADULT LEADER GROUP PHONE / CONFERENCE CALLS The program will offer Bi-weekly conference calls for adult leaders to connect and discuss various items. Conference call information will be shared in bi-weekly E-zines. The calls offer the means:  To disseminate useful information  For adult leaders to ask questions  For seasoned adult leaders to offer insight  For adult leaders to share successes
  • 33. 33 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. ADULT FOCUS GROUPS  Adult leader focus groups will be scheduled the first evening of the D2D Summit / Insect Fair (November or December 2013 -date to be decided).
  • 34. 34 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. QUESTIONS?

Notas do Editor

  1. Briefly go through the consent forms and why they are important for any research process.Point out that we will send a link to a video in one of the emails to review all the consent materials that we are asking for their help with.Point out that there will be biweekly emails to throughout the summer to help keep everyone connected, point out resources, and to stay on track in the program.
  2. Briefly go through the consent forms and why they are important for any research process.Point out that we will send a link to a video in one of the emails to review all the consent materials that we are asking for their help with.Point out that there will be biweekly emails to throughout the summer to help keep everyone connected, point out resources, and to stay on track in the program.
  3. These surveys are important means of feedback that helps to inform future program development as well as to assess how the program is achieving its goals and impacts.Please don’t opt out of SurveyMonkey.Stipend?
  4. Timing of the survey for the last meeting.It will be helpful to plan something exciting like ice cream or something on the last day. Maybe even a venue to report to parents.