1. How To Build A User-Focused Site
Lessons Learned From Redesigning AmericanActionForum.org
Eric Wilson
Digital Director
American Action Forum
New Media Exchange – September 13, 2013
2. Our partner on this project, Viget, deserves tremendous credit for
the creativity in the solutions presented here.
4. Anecdotally, we knew we needed to redesign
our website because…
The visual design felt dated
We weren’t able to highlight content how we wanted to
Our site wasn’t attracting & retaining key audiences
It was difficult to find & discover relevant research
5. It’s important to re-cast the complaints about
your current site as positive goals. Otherwise,
you’ll just end up with an ‘improved’ version of
your old website rather than solutions to
achieve your goals.
6. In positive terms, we wanted our new website
to
Highlight our most important, relevant content
Make all of our content easier to discover
Increase repeat visits and time on site
Make the site visually appealing on all devices
7. We decided from the outset that we would
achieve these goals by focusing on providing
the best possible experiences for the various
target audiences visiting our site.
8. Beyond our own opinions & anecdotal
evidence, we turned to our site analytics to
learn what we could improve about our site.
10. 56% of visits landed on an article or expert
page. 80% of these visits bounced.
That’s a 21% higher bounce rate than the
average visit.
11. We were successfully driving traffic to our site
through our outreach efforts (e.g. social &
email), but we weren’t giving them a reason to
stick around. Nor did we let them know who
we are or where they were in our site.
12. 45% of our internal site search queries were for
terms that could be categorized as granular
issue topics.
13. • Fiscal Cliff
• Social Security
• Unemployment
• Jobs
• Sequestration
• Medicare
• Affordable Care Act
• Medicare Advantage
• Individual Mandate
• Medicaid Expansion
Here’s what users were searching for on our site…
15. We were imposing an information architecture
on our users that made sense to us (and
reflected our internal organization) – not what
would help our users find the content they
wanted.
27. SOLUTION I
Flatter Information Architecture
A new, open taxonomy for categorizing
content. Users can search & filter content
based on issue topic tags.
175 unique topic tags & growing.
30. SOLUTION III
New Content Types
Additional content types – Quotes, Infographics, What We’re Reading &
Serialized Products – allow us to highlight the full breadth of our content.
They also enable us to highlight key research multiple times, ensuring our most
important initiatives are highlighted in the news feed.
38. TESTING
We went back to our users to make sure our solutions were on
the right track.
39. You are looking for research from the American Action Forum on Immigration. Where do you look?
74% of participants clicked on something related to research or immigration.
41. DIY
Recruit your friends & colleagues of varying backgrounds to
participate in user testing. We reached out to 100+ users
representing 6 different audiences.
49. Designing & building a user-focused site is only the first
part of the process. The content we post each day needs
to be user-focused as well.
50. CONTENT GUIDE EXCERPTS
“When linking to a file like a PDF from your post, indicate to the
reader that the link is not a web page by putting the file type [inside
brackets].”
“Give your posts titles that describe the content in a compelling way
and will help a user find what they are looking for if they are
searching.”
52. Shortly before we launched, I started to panic because our site
looked nothing like any other think tank website.
But response has been positive. Anecdotally, users like the
new site and
53. PROGRESS REPORT
Anecdotal feedback has been positive to date and we’ve
seen some viral success.
More time & traffic is needed to gather a full analytics
reporting.
54. But here’s what I’m keeping an eye on:
• Based on internal search queries, are users finding the
content they want?
• Do too many tags on a piece of content confuse users?
• Is there a better way to deal with notation in research
that doesn’t interrupt a user’s reading flow?
• What’s the best article length to keep a user engaged?