Office 365 Data Leakage Protection, DLP, Data Loss Prevention, Privacy, Compliance regulations
•Transferir como PPTX, PDF•
1 gostou•3,132 visualizações
Recomendados
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Mais procurados
Mais procurados (20)
Destaque
Destaque (16)
Semelhante a Office 365 Data Leakage Protection, DLP, Data Loss Prevention, Privacy, Compliance regulations
Semelhante a Office 365 Data Leakage Protection, DLP, Data Loss Prevention, Privacy, Compliance regulations (20)
Mais de Edge Pereira
Mais de Edge Pereira (11)
Último
Último (20)
Office 365 Data Leakage Protection, DLP, Data Loss Prevention, Privacy, Compliance regulations
- 1. C01: Office 365 : Data leakage protection, privacy, compliance and regulations • #SPSParis C01 • Edge Pereira • 30 Mai 2015 / May 30th, 2015
- 2. Merci aux sponsors!Platinum Gold/ Or Silver/ Argent Organizers/ Organisateurs Thanks to our sponsors! Raffle/ Tombola
- 3. 10% de remise avec le code SPSPa15www.sharepointeurope.com
- 5. “By far, the most common record type exposed in 2014 were passwords, followed by usernames, email addresses, and PII (name, address, SSN, DOB, phone number, etc.)…” 1 Billion Criminals are starting to favour PII over financial information, because it's easier to sell and leverage Source: http://www.cio.com/article/2848593/data-breach/nearly-a-billion-records-were-compromised-in-2014.html Records Compromised in 2014
- 6. “It was often said that people were the weakest link in any security chain—and that was true when attacks were less sophisticated. But today, no amount of education will stop hackers from getting into your network.” $400 Million There were 2,122 confirmed data breaches in 2014 Source: http://www.forbes.com/sites/gilpress/2015/05/22/stopping-data-breaches-whose-job-is-it-anyway/ Losses Due to Data Breaches
- 7. “SCAMS strip Australians of at least $80 million a year and gathering a vault of personal information that can be used in fraud sprees.” $80 Million Criminals are buying and selling names, addresses, birth dates, bank account and other personal details on the black market to commit identity fraud or find scam victims, a report warns. Source: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/law-order/scammers-steal-80-million-a-year-and-personal-information-from-australians/story-fni0fee2-1227358157405 Individual Losses Due to Scammers
- 8. Data Breaches Source: Liam Clearly BRK2142 Microsoft Ignite
- 9. Source: Gartner Report: IT Governance, Risk, and Compliance Management Solutions, http://www.gartner.com/resId=1884814 “Faced with never-ending and expanding regulatory and industry mandates, organizations invest tremendous amounts of energy on audit, compliance, controls, and (in some cases) risk management. At the same time, they seek to free staff resources from mundane tasks such as evidence gathering and simple reporting.”
- 10. • Introduction • Importance of Regulatory and Compliance Controls • Controls in Office 365 • Demos • Data Loss Prevention • eDiscovery • Auditing • Document Fingerprinting • Encrypted Email Communications Our Agenda for Today
- 11. Why are we here?
- 13. Compliance – What is it?
- 14. Why do we need to take compliance seriously?
- 15. Let’s look at Office 365 customer controls Identify Monitor Protect Educate
- 16. So what is Microsoft doing? eDiscovery Auditing Encryption Information Management Policies Records Management
- 17. Two faces of compliance in Office 365 Built-in Office 365 capabilities (global compliance) Customer controls for compliance/internal policies • Access Control • Auditing and Logging • Continuity Planning • Incident Response • Risk Assessment • Communications Protection • Identification and Authorisation • Information Integrity • Awareness and Training • Data Loss Prevention • Archiving • eDiscovery • Encryption • S/MIME • Legal Hold • Rights Management
- 18. In practise, it looks like this
- 19. What does your organisation get? • Independent verification • Regulatory compliance • Peace of mind • Improved governance • Better risk management • Avoiding prosecution
- 20. Sara Aziz Janet Denis Sales Finance Sales Manager Legal Our Demo Participants
- 23. 50% Of the IT organizations will use security services firms that specialize in data protection, security risk management and security infrastructure management to enhance their security postures Source: http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2828722 By 2018, Data Leakage Protection
- 24. What is meant by Data Loss Prevention? in-use (endpoint actions) in-motion (network traffic) at-rest (data storage) [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_loss_prevention_software Good definition http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/SNS/rbac/documents/data-loss.pdf
- 25. eDiscovery
- 26. DEMO: eDiscovery
- 27. • Operating System and Apps fully patched and up to date • End-point security tools installed and correctly configured • Firewall enabled and correctly configured • Access to required applications only • Access to “need to know” data • Compliance Adherence Monitoring In-use controls (end-point)
- 28. At-rest controls
- 29. Country PII Financial Health USA US State Security Breach Laws, US State Social Security Laws, COPPA GLBA & PCI-DSS (Credit, Debit Card, Checking and Savings, ABA, Swift Code) Limited Investment: US HIPPA, UK Health Service, Canada Health Insurance card Rely on Partners and ISVs Germany EU data protection, Drivers License, Passport National Id EU Credit, Debit Card, IBAN, VAT, BIC, Swift Code UK Data Protection Act, UK National Insurance, Tax Id, UK Driver License, Passport EU Credit, Debit Card, IBAN, BIC, VAT, Swift Code Canada PIPED Act, Social Insurance, Drivers License Credit Card, Swift Code France EU data protection, Data Protection Act, National Id (INSEE), Drivers License, Passport EU Credit, Debit Card, IBAN, BIC, VAT, Swift Code Japan PIPA, Resident Registration, Social Insurance, Passport, Driving License Credit Card, Bank Account, Swift Code Built-in DLP content areas
- 30. Establishing DLP Design and implement • Determine sensitive information types and related policies or regulations • Establish policies to protect sensitive data • Implement Office 365 DLP features Operate • Detect sensitive data in email • Detect sensitive data with document fingerprinting • User awareness with Outlook Policy tips
- 31. What do we mean by eDiscovery? Source: Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_discovery)
- 32. eDiscovery Process Find relevant content (documents, emails, Lync conversions)DISCOVERY PRESERVATION Place content on legal hold to prevent content modification and/or removal Collect and send relevant content for processing Prepare files for review PRODUCTION REVIEW Lawyers determine which content will be supplied to opposition Provide relevant content to opposition COLLECTION PROCESSING
- 34. In-place Hold
- 35. Auditing
- 37. SharePoint – Auditing Features
- 39. Find what you need • •
- 41. eDiscovery Considerations • Recoverable Items quotas separate from mailbox quotas and need to be monitored • In-Place Hold vs. Single Item Recovery vs. Retention Hold • Hybrid data sources
- 44. Risk mitigation • Centrally managed proactive enforcement • Reduced collection touch points • Consistent and repeatable Minimised business impact • Transparent to users • Minimises the need for offline copies, until they are needed • Instantly searchable/exportable Lower cost! Important Benefits
- 46. Q & A
- 47. • Introduction • Importance of Regulatory and Compliance Controls • Controls in Office 365 • Demos • Data Loss Prevention • eDiscovery • Auditing • Document Fingerprinting • Encrypted Email Communications Wrap Up
- 48. Learn More TechEd 2014 Office 365 Security and Compliance https://channel9.msdn.com/Events/TechEd/Australia/2014/OSS 304 Office 365 Trust Centre http://office.microsoft.com/en-au/business/office-365-trust- center-cloud-computing-security-FX103030390.aspx Office Blogs http://blogs.office.com/2013/10/23/cloud-services-you-can- trust-security-compliance-and-privacy-in-office-365/ Governance, risk management, and compliance http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governance,_risk_management, _and_compliance Office 365 Service Descriptions http://technet.microsoft.com/en- us/library/jj819284%28v=technet.10%29 Useful Links
- 49. Thank you ! Merci ! Online evaluation form Evaluations en ligne http://tinyurl.com/SPSParis2015
- 51. Content Analysis Process Joseph F. Foster Visa: 4485 3647 3952 7352 Expires: 2/2012 Get Content 4485 3647 3952 7352 a 16 digit number is detected RegEx Analysis 1. 4485 3647 3952 7352 matches checksum 2. 1234 1234 1234 1234 does NOT match Function Analysis 1. Keyword Visa is near the number 2. A regular expression for date (2/2012) is near the number Additional Evidence 1. There is a regular expression that matches a check sum 2. Additional evidence increases confidence Verdict
- 52. Office 365 Message Encryption – Encrypt messages to any SMTP address Information Rights Management – Encrypt content and restrict usage; usually within own organization or trusted partners S/MIME – Sign and encrypt messages to users using certificates Encryption Solutions in Office 365
- 53. Registry Key Outlook Client
Notas do Editor
- Template may not be modified Twitter hashtag: #spsparis for all sessions Keep the flags corresponding to your session
- Data travels with you. Transparent, with controls applied automatically. Anywhere in the world.
- From mainstream products
- Encryption at Rest: Uses Transparent Data Encryption (TDE). TDE leverages from a server level certificate to do page level encryption on the raw sharepoint database files. Using a symmetric key stored in the SharePoint master database in the form of a certificate. Data is encrypted in AES or 3DES and the original certificate is required to access the database. Secure Connections: Done via Secure Socket Layer (SSL). SSL performs a certificate exchange process to validate the server's authenticity and encrypt the data passed across the servers, encrypting the information transmitted between them. Attackers trying to use sniff the trafic using WireShark or some similar tool would only see unintelligible content.
- Improvement from Litigation hold. While in Exchange 2010, administrators could only either hold all mailbox data indefinitely or until the hold was removed, in Exchange 2013 In-Place Hold allows administrators to specify what to hold and for how long to hold it for. This allows administrators to create granular hold policies to preserve mailbox items in the following scenarios: Indefinite In-Place Hold is similar to litigation hold in Exchange 2010 as it is intended to preserve all mailbox items indefinitely, during which period items are never deleted; Query-based In-Place Hold preserves items based on specified query parameters such as keywords, senders and recipients, start and end dates, and also item types such as e-mails, calendar items, etc. After a query-based In-Place Hold is created, all existing and future mailbox items (including e-mails received at a later date) that match the query parameters are preserved. Note that a query-based hold cannot be used to place unsearchable items on hold (items that could not be indexed by Exchange Search); Time-based In-Place Hold allows administrators to specify an exact duration of time to hold items for. The duration is calculated from the date a mailbox item is received or created. For example, if a mailbox is placed on a time-based hold with a retention period of 365 days and an e-mail is deleted after 300 days from the date it was received, it is held for an additional 65 days before being permanently deleted; Multiple holds - place a user on multiple holds to meet different case requirements. In this scenario, search parameters of all In-Place Holds are applied together using an OR operator. If a mailbox is placed on more than five holds, all items are held until the holds are removed, replicating the indefinite hold behavior until the number of holds on the mailbox is reduced to five or less. Preserving Lync Content Exchange 2013, Lync 2013 and SharePoint 2013 provide an integrated preservation and eDiscovery experience that allows administrators to preserve and search items across the different data stores. As such, Exchange 2013 allows the archive of Lync 2013 content in Exchange, removing the requirement of having a separate SQL Server database to store archived Lync content. When placing a mailbox on In-Place Hold, Lync content (such as instant messaging conversations and files shared in online meetings) are archived in the mailbox. Searching the mailbox using the eDiscovery Center in SharePoint 2013 or In-Place eDiscovery in Exchange 2013, any archived Lync content matching the search query is also returned. To enable archiving of Lync 2013 content in Exchange 2013, administrators must configure Lync integration with Exchange.
- Placing all users on hold for a fixed duration Placing a user on multiple In-Place Holds In-Place Hold and Litigation Hold Recoverable Items include:- Deletions Purges Discovery Hold Versions Audits Calendar logging ALL SEACHABLE While in Exchange 2010, administrators could only either hold all mailbox data indefinitely or until the hold was removed, in Exchange 2013 In-Place Hold allows administrators to specify what to hold and for how long to hold it for. This allows administrators to create granular hold policies to preserve mailbox items in the following scenarios: Indefinite In-Place Hold is similar to litigation hold in Exchange 2010 as it is intended to preserve all mailbox items indefinitely, during which period items are never deleted; Query-based In-Place Hold preserves items based on specified query parameters such as keywords, senders and recipients, start and end dates, and also item types such as e-mails, calendar items, etc. After a query-based In-Place Hold is created, all existing and future mailbox items (including e-mails received at a later date) that match the query parameters are preserved. Note that a query-based hold cannot be used to place unsearchable items on hold (items that could not be indexed by Exchange Search); Time-based In-Place Hold allows administrators to specify an exact duration of time to hold items for. The duration is calculated from the date a mailbox item is received or created. For example, if a mailbox is placed on a time-based hold with a retention period of 365 days and an e-mail is deleted after 300 days from the date it was received, it is held for an additional 65 days before being permanently deleted; Multiple holds - place a user on multiple holds to meet different case requirements. In this scenario, search parameters of all In-Place Holds are applied together using an OR operator. If a mailbox is placed on more than five holds, all items are held until the holds are removed, replicating the indefinite hold behavior until the number of holds on the mailbox is reduced to five or less. Preserving Lync Content Exchange 2013, Lync 2013 and SharePoint 2013 provide an integrated preservation and eDiscovery experience that allows administrators to preserve and search items across the different data stores. As such, Exchange 2013 allows the archive of Lync 2013 content in Exchange, removing the requirement of having a separate SQL Server database to store archived Lync content. When placing a mailbox on In-Place Hold, Lync content (such as instant messaging conversations and files shared in online meetings) are archived in the mailbox. Searching the mailbox using the eDiscovery Center in SharePoint 2013 or In-Place eDiscovery in Exchange 2013, any archived Lync content matching the search query is also returned. To enable archiving of Lync 2013 content in Exchange 2013, administrators must configure Lync integration with Exchange.