O slideshow foi denunciado.
Utilizamos seu perfil e dados de atividades no LinkedIn para personalizar e exibir anúncios mais relevantes. Altere suas preferências de anúncios quando desejar.

Inleiding panel NVAO conferentie 26 januari 2015

Drie belangrijke uitdagingen voor het HO in Vlaanderen en Nederland: 1) de talentontwikkeling stokt; 2) minder consensus over kwaliteitsbegrip; 3) financieringsuitdaging.

  • Entre para ver os comentários

Inleiding panel NVAO conferentie 26 januari 2015

  1. 1. UITDAGINGEN EN DILEMMA’S VOOR HET HOGER ONDERWIJS Dirk Van Damme, IMEP/EDU/OECD
  2. 2. STELLING 1: ONDERWIJSEXPANSIE VERTRAAGT TERWIJL WE MEER HOOGGESCHOOLDEN NODIG HEBBEN
  3. 3. Gemiddelde jaarlijkse groei hoger-onderwijs- kwalificaties in 25-34-jarigen 2000-2013 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
  4. 4. Intergenerationele onderwijsmobiliteit 25-34j en gelijke kansen HO-participatie 20-34j Australia Austria CanadaDenmark Estonia Finland France Germany IrelandItaly Japan Korea Netherlands Norway Poland Spain Sweden United States Flanders (Belgium) England/N. Ireland (United Kingdom) Russian Federation* Average 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 12345678910 Upwardmobility Odds ratio less equitable access low educational mobility less equitable access high educational mobility more equitable access high educational mobility more equitable access low educational mobility
  5. 5. STELLING 2: KWALITEIT HOGER ONDERWIJS IS GOED, MAAR TE ZEER INTERN GEDEFINIEERD
  6. 6. Totaal ranking per land in THEWUR 2010 en 2013 (zonder US en UK) Netherlands, +674 Germany, +288 France, +544 Australia, -183 Canada, -269 Switzerland, -45Belgium, +499 Japan, -54Sweden, +84 0 500 1000 1500 0 500 1000 1500 TotalRanks2013 Total Ranks 2010
  7. 7. 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 Spain England (UK) England/N. Ireland (UK) Ireland Italy Korea Canada Poland United States Northern Ireland (UK) Australia Estonia Average France Denmark Norway Slovak Republic Germany Japan Sweden Austria Netherlands Flanders (Belgium) Czech Republic Finland Numeracy scores of tertiary educated adults of 25-34y old 95th percentile mean score tertiary 25-34y
  8. 8. STELLING 3: DE FINANCIERING VAN HOGER ONDERWIJS IS SUBOPTIMAAL; EFFICIËNTIEWINST EN PRIVATE MIDDELEN ZULLEN NODIG ZIJN
  9. 9. Financiering per student (publiek en privaat, 2005-2011) United States Switzerland Denmark Sweden Norway Finland Netherlands Germany Japan Ireland Belgium France Austria Spain Israel United Kingdom Brazil Italy KoreaPolandPortugal Czech RepublicHungary Chile Slovak Republic Mexico Estonia Iceland Russian Federation New Zealand Slovenia R² = 0.079 5 000 10 000 15 000 20 000 25 000 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Annual expenditure per student (2011, USD) Change in expenditure per student between 2005 and 2011 (%) OECD average Tertiary education OECD average
  10. 10. Dank! dirk.vandamme@oecd.org www.oecd.org/edu/ceri twitter @VanDammeEDU 10

×