JournalThink about a time when you were part of a high function.docx

Journal:
Think about a time when you were part of a high functioning
team. How creative was this team? Without including names,
were unethical or immoral actions taken? If so, what was the
impact on trust within the team? If you do not have experience
on a high functioning team, think about any team with which
you have experience. Why was it not high functioning?
[Learning Outcome 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3]
Your journal entry must be at least 200 words. No references or
citations are necessary. Single spaced.
Unit 7 Essay
Instructions
Write an essay comparing and contrasting how a leader may use
relative moral theories and universal moral theories. Consider
the following situation.
You are a member of the university debate team. You have an
upcoming competition with your most bitter rival, and the
general topic has been released: relative moral theories vs.
universal moral theories, which are more effective with regard
to team success?
Select a position for the debate. In other words, decide which of
the two you believe is the more effective. The best debaters are
able to present both sides of the issue while explaining why
their position is correct. To that end, discuss each of the two
types of moral theories, and provide evidence as to why your
selected position is the correct position. [Learning Outcome
6.1]
Make sure to address the following points in the essay.
· Give an explanation of relative moral theories. [Learning
Outcome 6.1]

· Give an explanation of universal moral theories. [Learning
Outcome 6.1]
· What is the impact of unethical or immoral behaviors on trust
within a team? [Learning Outcome 6.2]
· Which type of theory would be more effective in establishing
trust within a team, and why? [Learning Outcome 6.3]
The essay should be a minimum of three pages and should
include at least two sources from the CSU Online Library
databases for support.
As a research tip, go to the CSU Online Library, click on
databases, and go to ABI/Inform Collection database. In the
search field, type “teleological framework,” and hit Search.
Select an article from the list of results that provides evidence
supporting the position selected. After you have finished with
the selected article, go back to the search page. Repeat this
process entering “deontological framework,” and select an
article from the list of results. When entering these terms
include the quotation marks. These two searches should provide
articles that can be used in support of either position.
APA style should be used for this assignment. All sources used,
including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and
quoted material must have accompanying APA citations.
Resources
The following resource(s) may help you with this assignment.
· Citation Guide
· CSU Online Library Research Guide
Fall 2019
NURS 4345
Podcast Evaluation Form
Healthcare Information Technology

PODCAST EVALUATION FORM
Web Source/URL that is not a Podcast will receive an assigned
grade of zero (0).
Student
Name:_______________________________________________
__________________
Course:______________________________________________
_________________________
Instructor:____________________________________________
_________________________
Web Source
Title:________________________________________________
_______________
Web Source
URL:________________________________________________
_______________
Date Visited Web
Source:______________________________________________
___________
Describe the main points presented in the Podcast. Discussion
of main points demonstrates detail, depth, creativity and critical
thinking. Podcasts on diagnosis, disease processes, nursing
techniques, treatments or procedures are not appropriate for this
assignment. A podcast that does not have a focus on healthcare
information technology and/or informatics will have point
deduction according to the rubric for this assignment.
Discussion of the criteria should be written in a well-developed,
concise and succinct paragraph (Minimum of 200 words using
APA Format with double-spacing of the text, 12-font, Times

New Roman, and in-text citations that are also placed on the
reference list.
Reference for Main Themes: Adapted from Harvard College
The evaluation form utilizes a 1 (Low) to 5 (High) scale. Please
place a check mark in the column that is based on your
perception of the Web source. There should only be one mark
for each of the four areas. For example, if you assigned a value
of “5” for each of the four criteria the total score would be 20.
PODCAST evaluation criteria
(Pullen & Silvers, 2018)
CRITERIA
1
2
3
4
5
1. AuthoritY:and design:
a. The URL indicates that the podcast originates from a
reputable source.
B. The author or organization is a qualified authority that
presents the information in a non-biased and non-
discriminatory manner.
C. The podcast is hosted by a moderator.
D. Contact information is cited on the podcast website.
E. The purpose of the podcast is clearly stated on the website.

F. The terminology is appropriate for the audience.
G. The creation and revision dates are cited on the website.
H. The podcast is easily accessible and to use.
I. The podcast allows viewers to download handouts or
transcripts.
J. The podcast design is appealing and presented in a
professional manner.
K. The podcast is easily readable without errors in grammar
or spelling.
L. The presenter’s voice is sufficient in volume and articulate
in speech.
M. The podcast is compliant with the American’s with
Disability Act (ADA) through visual and auditory
information.
APA format with double-spacing of the text, 12-font, Times
New Roman and in-text citations that are also placed on the
reference list.
CRITERIA
1
2
3

4
5
2. evidence-based practice:
A. The podcast includes references from peer-reviewed
journals, books, or professional organizations that are
generally not older than five years.
B. The podcast is relevant (Has value) in the education of
nurses and other health professionals and the patient.
C. The podcast advances the profession of nursing through
evidence-based best practices.
D. The podcast promotes safe, quality patient care.
New Roman, and in-text citations that are also placed on the
reference list.
CRITERIA
1
2
3
4
5
3. patient-centered care:
A. Patient values beliefs, and resources are addressed in the

podcast.
B. The podcast clearly presents that the patient is an integral
member of the inter-professional team and takes an active role
in their care.
C. The podcast promotes shared decision-making between the
patient and other health professionals.
reference list.
CRITERIA
1
2
3
4
5
4. teaching foundation:
A. The podcast promotes active engagement in the learning
experiences.
B. The podcast uses diverse teaching strategies to educate
nurses and other health professionals, students, or patients.
C. Diverse technologies are integrated into the podcast to
promote learning.

reference list.
TOTAL PODCAST EVALUATION
TOTAL POINTS
Total possible points is 20. Rating based on the total possible
points:
18-20: Excellent
16-17: Good
14-15: Fair
12-13: Poor
< 12: Very poor
Student Rating________
· Please describe in detail your personal evaluation of the
Podcast by answering the following questions. Place your
narrative responses on this form following each question. Do
not create another form or document. Responses should be

written in well-developed, concise and succinct paragraphs.
Responses demonstrate effective preparation, critical thinking
and are free from sentence structure errors, word choice errors
and spelling/grammar/punctuation errors. Please refer to
Scholarly Writing and APA Helpful Hints document located in
the Syllabus tab. Each response is a minimum of 250 words
excluding references. APA format should be used when
responding to the questions with double-spacing of the text, 12-
font, Times New Roman and in-text references citations that are
also placed on the reference list.
· Three references are required for the Podcast Evaluation
excluding the Podcast discussed. The APA 6th edition textbook
will not be considered as a required reference for this
assignment.
· More than three references are recommended for a higher
grade for the Podcast Evaluation excluding the Podcast.
Citations should be peer-reviewed, scholarly and professional.
Citations should not be older than 5 five years. Please refer to
the Syllabus tab.
1. Would you recommend this Podcast to your peers, other
healthcare providers and patients? (Address each one). Why or
why not?
2. How would you integrate the Podcast information into your
own nursing practice?
Describe at least two ways that the Podcast is relevant to your
nursing practice.
Revised: 7/16/2019 cs/rp; 8/5/2019 cs/rp

Fall 2019
NURS 4345
Podcast Evaluation Grading Rubric
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Content is 70% of the assignment grade.
Scholarly Presentation is 15% of the assignment grade.
APA formatting is 15% of the assignment grade.
Criteria Expert Proficient Competent Substantial Areas
for Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Podcast focus is on
healthcare information
technology and/or
informatics
Completed required
items on Podcast
Evaluation Form:
Student name
Course
Instructor
Podcast title

Podcast URL
Creator and/or
publisher of podcast
Date visited Podcast
Content provides
information on all
required criteria
items
Content is missing
one of the required
criteria items
Content is missing
two or three of the
required criteria
items
Content is missing
four or five of the
required criteria
items
Assignment not
posted
OR
Does not meet the
requirements of
the criteria
OR
Podcast focus is
not on healthcare

information
technology and/or
informatics
OR
URL is not a
podcast
Points 5 Points 3 Points 2 Points 1 Points 0 Points
Described the main
points presented in the
Podcast on healthcare
technology and/or
informatics
Discussion of main
points demonstrate
detail, depth, creativity
and critical thinking with
a minimum of 200
words.
Content describes
the main points of
the Podcast on
healthcare
technology and/or
informatics in
detail, and depth
demonstrating
creativity and
critical thinking.
Content describes
the main points of
the Podcast on

healthcare
technology and/or
informatics
Content describes
minimal
information on the
main points of the
Podcast on
healthcare
technology and/or
informatics
.
Content describes
limited information
on the main points of
the Podcast on
healthcare
technology and/or
informatics
OR
Did not meet
minimum word
count.
The assignment
was not posted.
OR
Does not meet the
requirements of

the criteria
OR
URL is not a
podcast
Evaluated each Criteria
on the Appraisal Form
using the 1 to 5 Likert
scale.
Evaluate each of the four
criteria in a minimum of
50 words excluding
references
1. Authority & Design
2. Evidence-based
Practice
3. Patient Centered
Care
4. Teaching Foundation
Evaluated four
Criteria on the 1 to
5 Likert scale.

Described each of
the criteria within
minimum word
count
Evaluated three
5 Likert scale.
Described three of
the four criteria
within minimum
word
Evaluated two
5 Likert scale.
Described two of
the four criteria
within minimum
word count
Evaluated one
Criteria on the 1 to 5
Likert scale.

Described one of the
four criteria
OR
Did not meet
minimum word count
on each criteria
Did not evaluate
any of the Criteria
on the 1-5 Likert
scale
Did not describe
any of the four
criteria
OR
Assignment not
posted
OR
URL is not a
podcast
Question #1:
Would you recommend

this Podcast to your
peers, other healthcare
Response is
written in well-
developed
paragraph
describing in detail
Response describes
the student’s
personal
recommendation of
Response provides
minimal
description of the
student’s
recommendation of
Response did not
meet criteria as
evidenced by
+providing limited
description of the
Assignment not
posted
OR
Fall 2019
NURS 4345

providers and patients?
Why or why not?
Please be specific with
sufficient detail and
references to support
your response.
Minimum of 250 words
excluding references.
the student’s
personal
recommendation
of the Podcast
within minimal
word count
the Podcast within
minimal word count

the Podcast within
minimal word
count
student’s
recommendation of
the Podcast.
OR
Did not meet
minimum word count

Does not meet the
requirements of
the criteria
OR
URL is not a
podcast
Question #2:
How would you integrate
the Podcast information
into your own nursing
practice?
Please be specific with
sufficient detail and
references to support
your response.
Minimum 250 words
excluding references
Response
describes in detail
two or more ways
that the Podcast is
relevant to the
students nursing
practice within
minimal word
count

Response describes
two ways the
Podcast is relevant
to the students
nursing practice
within minimal
word count
Response provides
minimal
information on two
ways the Podcast
is relevant to the
student’s nursing
practice within
minimal word
count

Response did not
meet criteria as
evidenced by the
following:
+Provides
information on one
way the Podcast is
relevant to the
student’s nursing
practice.
OR
Did not meet
minimum word count
Assignment not
posted
OR
Does not meet the
requirements of
the criteria
OR
URL is not a
podcast
Scholarly

Presentation
*Please refer to APA
and Scholarly Writing
Helpful Hints located
in the Syllabus for
examples of scholarly
writing errors.
Writing style allows for
clear communication of
thoughts through logical
presentation
(organization)
demonstrating effective
preparation, and critical
thinking.
Writing style is free from
sentence structure
errors, word choice
errors and
spelling/grammar/punct
uation errors.
Correct spelling,
grammar,
punctuation and
sentence structure

One spelling,
grammar,
punctuation or
sentence structure
error
Two spelling,
grammar,
punctuation or
sentence structure
errors
Three spelling,

grammar,
punctuation or
sentence structure
Errors
Four or more
spelling, grammar,
punctuation or
sentence structure
errors
OR
URL is not a
podcast
APA
*Please refer to APA

and Scholarly Writing
Helpful Hints located
in the Syllabus for
examples of APA
errors.
References are cited
correctly in the text and
in the reference list.
Three references are
required for the Podcast
Utilized more than
three references
APA format correct
Utilized three
references
APA format correct

Utilized three
references but the
requirements of
the references was
not met as
evidenced by:
+Utilized the
discussed Podcast
as a required
reference
OR
+One APA error
Requirement for the
references was not
met as evidenced by:
+Utilized one or two
references
OR
+Cited reference(s)
are not peer-
reviewed, scholarly
or professional
OR
+Two APA errors
No references
cited
OR
Three or more APA

errors
OR
URL is not a
podcast
Fall 2019
NURS 4345
Evaluation excluding the
Podcast discussed and
the APA 6th edition
textbook
References should be
peer-reviewed, scholarly
and professional.
References should not
be older than 5 years.
Grade

PLAGIARISM:
Plagiarism is considered cheating and is a violation of academic
integrity as outlined in the Student Handbook. Any student who
plagiarizes any portion of the assignment may receive a grade
of zero on the assignment.
LATE ASSIGNMENTS:
Unless prior faculty notification and negotiation of an extended
deadline, ten (10) points will be deducted per day if submitted
late.
Assignment will not be accepted if submitted more than 3 days
late and assigned grade will be 0 (zero).
Revised: 8/1/2013; 12/29/2014; 08/2016 12/2016; 3/27cs;
7/2017 cs/rp; 6/2018 cs/rp; 12/2018 cs/rp; 4/2019 cs/rp;
7/16/2019 cs/rp; 8/8/2019 cs/rp
Fall 2019 Page 1 of 3 NURS 4345
Module A Healthcare Information Technology
Module A focuses on Healthcare Information Technology (HIT)
as an area which is influencing
Healthcare Reform for nurses, practitioners, educators, and

administrators at local, state, and national
levels. Healthcare information technology provides
opportunities for healthcare providers to improve
productivity, operational efficiency, education, patient
satisfaction, including safety and quality in
delivery of patient care. At the completion of this module the
student will have evaluated the role of
HIT in improving delivery of patient care. Additionally the
student will have assessed the challenges
and successes of implementing HIT as well as strategies to
overcome these challenges.
Module Objectives
2. Describe healthcare technology tools utilized in delivery of
patient care.
4. Analyze healthcare information technology challenges and
successes in the delivery of patient
care.
Learning Activities
Resources
• Yoder-Wise, P.S. (2019). Chapter 16: The Impact of
Technology. In Leading and managing in
nursing (7th ed.) (pp. 274-297). St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier.
Review the following websites:
• http://www.himss.org/right-balance-technology-and-patient-
care
• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2686/

• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4342639/
• https://www.healthcare-
informatics.com/category/podcasts/podcast
http://www.himss.org/right-balance-technology-and-patient-care
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4342639/
https://www.healthcare-
informatics.com/category/podcasts/podcast
Podcast Evaluation
Students will gain experience searching the Web for Podcasts
on Healthcare Information
Technology. Students will evaluate the quality of the design of
and information provided by the
Podcast. A Podcast is an audio or audiovisual file that is
uploaded to the Internet by an individual
or organization. Select a topic that you are interested in that is
related to healthcare information
technology and/or informatics. There are numerous podcasts on
the Internet. For example, you
might take your topic and do an Internet search using search
engines such as Google or Mozilla
Firefox. Be sure to put your topic idea and the word "Podcast"
in your search. You might select
topics and/or processes that you are using in your practice
setting. A podcast that does not
have a focus on healthcare information technology and/or
informatics will have point

deductions according to the rubric for this assignment.
A Web Source/URL that is not a Podcast will receive an
assigned grade of zero (0).
• Section I
Students will use the Podcast Evaluation Form to evaluate the
integrity of the Podcast. The
first page of the form is information about the Web source.
Describe the main points
presented in the Podcast within a minimum 200 word count
using APA format including double-
spacing. Discussion of main points demonstrates detail, depth,
creativity and critical thinking.
• Section II
Students will evaluate four different criteria related to the
Podcast. Please provide a narrative
description for each of the four criteria within a minimum 50
word count for each criteria using
APA format. These criteria include:
1. Authority and Design
2. Patient-Centered Care
3. Evidence-Based Practice
4. Teaching Foundation
The evaluation form utilizes a 1 (Low) to 5 (High) scale. Please
place a check mark in the
column that is based on your perception of the Web source.
There should only be one mark for

each of the four areas. For example, if you assigned a value of
“5” for each of the four criteria
the total score would be 20.
_____________________________________________________
_________________________________________
• Section III
Please describe in detail your personal assessment of the
Podcast by answering the following
questions. The response to the evaluation questions should be
written in well-developed,
concise and succinct paragraphs. Each response is a minimum of
250 words excluding
references using APA format Please be specific with sufficient
detail and references to support
your response.
1. Would you recommend this Podcast to your (1) peers, (2)
other healthcare providers and
(3) patients (Address each one). Why or why not?
2. How would you integrate the Podcast information into your
own nursing practice? Describe
at least two ways that the Podcast is relevant to your nursing
practice.
• Section IV
Scholarly Writing
Writing style allows for clear communication through logical
presentation/organization of ideas.
Responses should be free from scholarly writing errors. Please

refer to Scholarly Writing and
APA Helpful Hints document located in the Syllabus tab.
• References
Three references are required for the Podcast Evaluation
excluding the Podcast. More than
three references are recommended for a higher grade for the
Podcast Evaluation excluding the
Podcast. The APA 6th edition textbook will not be considered
as a required reference for this
assignment. References should be correctly cited and listed in
APA format. Please refer to
the Syllabus tab.
References should be peer- reviewed, scholarly and
professional. References should not be
older than 5 years.
• Submit the completed Podcast Evaluation Form in the Mod A
Podcast Evaluation
assignment icon.
Healthcare Information TechnologyModule ObjectivesLearning
ActivitiesResourcesAssignments

JournalThink about a time when you were part of a high function.docx

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a JournalThink about a time when you were part of a high function.docx

Semelhante a JournalThink about a time when you were part of a high function.docx (6)

Mais de croysierkathey

Mais de croysierkathey (20)

Último

Último (20)

JournalThink about a time when you were part of a high function.docx