1. Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease
Jatin Kothari MD, DM
Hinduja Hospital, Hinduja Healthcare &
Apex Kidney Foundation
Mumbai, India.
2. Defining “CKD”
Kidney damage for ≥ 3 months, defined by structural or functional
abnormalities of the kidney, with or without decreased GFR, manifest by
either
Pathologic abnormalities, or
Markers of kidney damage, such as abnormalities of the blood or
urine, or in imaging tests (but NOT HTN).
GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2
for ≥ 3 months with or without kidney damage.
Pathologic Abnormalities?
By Radiology (US, CT, MR, etc)--e.g.
Multiple cysts consistent with PKD
Extensive scarring
Small kidneys--but be careful of the term “medical renal disease”.
REMEMBER: Renal masses or cysts that are not simple should be
referred to a UROLOGIST!!
By Histology--ie, renal biopsy
3. CKD Patients Are More Likely to Die than to Progress to ESRD
0% 20
%
40
%
60
%
80
%
100
%
GFR 60-89, No Proteinuria
GFR 60-89; + Proteinuria
GFR 30-59
GFR 15-29
Died
RRT
Event Free
Disenrolled
Keith, et al, Arch Int Med; 2004; 164:659-663
5 year follow-up
N=27998
4. The Patient with early stage CKD is 5 to 10
times more likely to die from a cardiovascular
event than progress to ESRD.
Foley RN, Murray AM, Li S, Herzog CA, McBean AM, Eggers PW, Collins AJ.
Chronic kidney disease and the risk for cardiovascular disease, renal
replacement, and death in the United States Medicare population, 1998 to
1999. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16:489-95.
5. Anemia and CKDAnemia and CKD
• Anemia usually develops during the course of chronic kidney
disease and may be associated with adverse outcomes.
• Anemia is one of the modifiable complications of CKD.
• All individuals with hemoglobin (Hb) levels lower than physiologic norms
are considered anemic.
Erythropoietin deficiency is the primary cause of anemia of CKD.
The NKF recommends that evaluation for anemia should occur when GFR
<60 mL/min/1.73 m2
; measurement should include Hb level.
Anemia should be treated according to the K/DOQITM
guidelines for anemia
of CKD.
7. K/DOQI:K/DOQI: Evaluation and Management ofEvaluation and Management of
AnemiaAnemia
For Adults with ≥ Stage 3 CKD:
Assess Hemoglobin level
If anemia (HgB ≤ 12)
RBC indices/CBC
Reticulocyte count
Iron studies
Test for occult GI bleeding as indicated
Medical evaluation of comorbid conditions
Erythropoetin levels are usually NOT indicated.
9. Pathway: treatment
Iron
Iron correction should maintain:
• serum ferritin > 200 μg/l
• transferrin saturation > 20% (unless ferritin > 800 μg/l)
• % hypochromic red cells < 6% (unless ferritin > 800 μg/l)
Review iron dose:
• when serum ferritin reaches 500 μg/l (should not rise above 800 μg/l)
Optimise iron status:
• before or when starting ESAs
• before deciding whether to use ESAs in non-dialysis patients
10. Oral vs parenteral iron
• Oral iron is not as effective as parenteral
iron in hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and
CKD patients
• Causes include:
– Iron malabsorption
– Lack of patient compliance due to GI effects
11. IV iron is superior to oral iron in
managing anemia of NDD-CKD
Time after initiating treatment (d)
0 14 28 42 56
Delta Hb
(g/dl)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 IV iron
Oral iron * *
*P < 0.05
Source: Iron Sucrose US Clinical Trials Group; Kidney Int: in press
12. Reevaluating traditional
parameters
• Ferritin:
– Storage iron
– Also an acute-phase reactant
– Should focus less on high ferritin levels and more
on indicators of iron available for erythropoiesis
• Newer measurements:
– Reticulocyte hemoglobin content
– Percent hypochromic RBCs
– Soluble transferrin receptors (sTfR)
13. Which iron marker to use?
• Patient needs increased EPO to meet target
hemoglobin levels
– Significant iron requirement
– Oral iron not enough, IV iron necessary
– TSAT is the best marker for iron available for
erythropoiesis
– Iron should be given to increase TSAT to the 20-
30% range
14. Ferritin should not limit the physician
• Before EPO therapy, patients could reach ferritin levels of 4000-
5000 ng/mL
– Physicians should not be too focused on ferritin level
• K/DOQI guideline updates:
– Based on studies showing that iron responsiveness decreases with
ferritin >500 ng/mL
• Distinction between:
– Patient with low TSAT and high ferritin with inflammation
– Patient with functional iron deficiency
• The latter can benefit from iron therapy
15. Adverse events with IV iron!
• No reported cases of hemochromatosis or hemosiderosis
with IV iron in the erythropoietin era
• Guidelines were updated for physicians not to use iron
indiscrimately
• Acute infusion of IV iron on immune system:
– Avoid in infected patients
– Avoid in patients with high CRP and high ferritin
16. Safety of IV iron:
CV morbidity?
• In vitro iron can be proinflammatory and induce
lipid peroxidation
• Could parenteral iron lead to accelerated
atherosclerosis, inflammation and thus CV
morbidity?
– In vitro doses required to have an effect are much
higher than used in IV iron
– Feldman et al saw no correlation between iron use and
CV mortality and morbodity
17. Safety of IV iron
• Higher risk with undertreatment
• Benefits of correcting anemia far outweigh
the theoretical risk of CV toxicity
18. Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents
• Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents (ESA)
– Epoetin alfa
• Starting dose range is 80-120 units/kg/week
– Darbepoetin
• Starting dose is usually 0.45 mcg/kg.week
19. Anemia Management Program
Agent Similarity to
Endogenous
Erythropoietin
Estimated
T 1/2
Initial Dosing Maintenance
Dosing
Epoetin alfa Identical
Immunologically
~ 16 to 19
hours
50-150 units/kg
TIW
Typical Dosing
is 150-300 u/kg
weekly
Generally
weekly or QOW
dosing
Darbepoetin
alfa
20% more
carbohydrate
content
~ 33 to 48
hours
0.45 mcg/kg/wk
Typical Dosing
is 0.9 mcg/kg
QOW
Generally every
2 to 4 week
dosing
Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents (ESA)
Available for Stage 1 – 5 CKD Patients
McClellan, Schoolwerth A., Gehr, T. Clinical Management of Chronic Kidney Disease.
Cadido, OK: Professional Communications, Inc.; 2006:185-208.
20. ESA Approval Timeline
Date Action
1989 Epoetin alfa approved: anemia
associated with chronic renal failure
1993 Epoetin alfa approved: anemia
associated with cancer chemotherapy
2001 Darbepoetin alfa approved: anemia
associated w/ chronic renal failure
2002 Darbepoetin alfa approved: anemia
associated w/ cancer chemotherapy
21. ESA Agents
Epoetin alfa Dose
(Units/week)
Darbepoetin alfa Dose
(mcg/week)
< 2,500 6.25
2,500 to 4,999 12.5
5,000 to 10,999 25
11,000 to 17,999 40
18,000 to 33,999 60
34,000 to 89,999 100
> 90,000 200
22. ESA Agents
Side Effect Profile
• HTN and Headaches
• Myalgias
• Diarrhea
Contraindications
• Uncontrolled HTN
• Known hypersensitivity to the active substance or
any of the excipients
23. ESA Agents
FDA Black Box Warning
Issued 3/9/07
• Use the lowest dose of ESA that will gradually increase the
Hgb concentration to the lowest level sufficient to avoid
the need for RBC transfusion.
• ESAs increase the risk for death and serious CV events
when administered to target a Hgb > 12 gm/dL.
24. ESA Utilization Guidelines
• Target Hgb at or above 11.0 gm/dL
• Caution when intentionally maintaining Hgb >
13.0 gm/dL
• Monitor Hgb minimum of every 30 days
• Target Ferritin > 100 ng/mL and T. Saturation
> 20%
• Monitor Iron Indices Quarterly
25. ESA Utilization Guidelines
Dose Adjustments
• If Hgb increases by > 2 gm/dL per 4 weeks
and/or Hgb level > 12 gm/dL, decrease dose
by 20 to 25%
• If Hgb level is increasing < 1 gm/dL per 4
weeks, increase dose by 20 to 25%
26. ESA Utilization Guidelines
Dose Adjustments
20 to 25% dose adjustments may be achieved
by:
• Altering the ESA dose
• Altering the time interval between injections
27. ESA Utilization Guidelines
Dose Adjustments
• Increases in dose should not be made more
frequently than once a month.
• Avoid holding doses to avoid marked drop in
ESA sensitive RBC precursors and the ‘seesaw’
effect of Hgb poor response pattern.
29. TREAT1
CHOIR2
CREATE3
1000 2000 3000 4000
Number of Patients
1
Pfeffer MA, et al. Pfeffer MA, et al. N Engl Med. 2009;361:2019-2032.
2
Drüeke TB, et al. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2071–2084.
3
Singh AK, et al. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2085–2098.
TREAT is the Largest Trial to Date That Has Studied ESA Use in Patients
With CKD
TREAT = Trial to Reduce cardiovascular Events with Aranesp®
Therapy
CHOIR= Correction of Hemoglobin and Outcomes In Renal insufficiency
CREATE = Cardiovascular Risk reduction in Early Anemia Treatment with Epoetin beta
CKD = chronic kidney disease
222 events
105 events
417 events
1,234 events* N = 4,038
N = 1,432
N = 603
*Cardiovascular endpoint
30. TREAT: Trial to Reduce Cardiovascular Events
With Aranesp®
(Darbepoetin alfa) Therapy
Pfeffer MA, et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;54:59-69.
Pfeffer MA, et al. N Engl Med. 2009;361:2019-2032.
Hypotheses:
Treatment of anemia with Aranesp® in subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD)
and type 2 diabetes mellitus decreases mortality and cardiovascular (CV) morbidity
Treatment of anemia with Aranesp® in subjects with CKD and type 2 diabetes
mellitus will delay the progression to ESRD
Aranesp®
(Target Hb 13 g/dL)
Placebo
(rescue if Hb < 9 g/dL)
Study Population
• Hb ≤ 11 g/dL
• eGFR 20-60
mL/min/1.73 m2
• Type 2 DM
N ~ 2000
N ~ 2000
Design –
randomized (1:1), double blind, placebo-controlled
Event-driven: :~1,203 patients with cardiovascular primary endpoint
Hypotheses:
Treatment of anemia with Aranesp® in subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD)
and type 2 diabetes mellitus decreases mortality and cardiovascular (CV) morbidity
Treatment of anemia with Aranesp® in subjects with CKD and type 2 diabetes
mellitus will delay the progression to ESRD
Aranesp®
(Target Hb 13 g/dL)
Placebo
(rescue if Hb < 9 g/dL)
Study Population
• Hb ≤ 11 g/dL
• eGFR 20-60
mL/min/1.73 m2
• Type 2 DM
N ~ 2000
N ~ 2000
Design –
randomized (1:1), double blind, placebo-controlled
Event-driven: :~1,203 patients with cardiovascular primary endpoint
31. Safety Concerns in the TREAT Study
• Trial to Reduce Cardiovascular Events with Aranesp Therapy (TREAT)
– Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial: 623 sites, 24 countries,
4038 patients (2012 darbepoetin alfa)
– Primary endpoint: composite outcomes of death or a cardiovascular event and
of death or end-stage renal disease
Pfeffer MA et al. N Engl J Med 2009;361:2019–2032
ESA
Placebo
5.0†
2.0‡
8.9§
7.5‡
2.6
1.1
7.1
0
2
4
6
8
10
Stroke Venous
thromboembolic
event
Arterial
thromboembolic
event
Cancer-related
mortality*
Patients(%)
0.6
†, p<0.001 versus placebo
‡, p=0.02 versus placebo
§, p=0.04 versus placebo
*Amongst patients with a history of malignancy at baseline
Coronary
revascularization
4.2‡
5.8
32. • A higher target Hgb increased cardiovascular events; a
higher achieved Hgb was associated with fewer
cardiovascular events.
•Targeted to near normal levels of Hgb often did not
achieve the target and more ESAs is prescribed to
achieve these targets
The anemia paradox:
• ESAs themselves
• Conditions that conferred hyporesponsiveness
The Culprit
Hyporesponsiveness increases cardiovascular risk
34. t
Resistance to ESAs
Conclusions
A poor initial hematopoietic response to ESAs was associated with an increased
subsequent risk of death or cardiovascular events as doses were escalated to
meet target hemoglobin levels
N Engl J Med. 2010 ;363(12):1146-55
hemoglobin level
achieved after 4
weeks
35. Locatelli, Del Vecchio, Casartelli N ENGL MED 362; 7 Feb 18, 2010
Should we stop treating our patients?
36. USE OF ESAs AND OTHER AGENTS TO TREAT ANEMIA IN CKD
KDIGO CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE
FOR ANEMIA IN CKD
ESA INITIATION CKD
3.4.1 For CKD ND patients with Hb ≥10.0 g/dL (≥ 100 g/L), we suggest that ESA
therapy not be initiated. (2D)
3.4.2 For CKD ND patients with Hb <10.0 g/dL (<100 g/L) we suggest
that the decision whether to initiate ESA therapy be individualized
based on the rate of fall of Hb, the risk of needing a transfusion, the
risks related to ESA therapy and the presence of symptoms
attributable to anemia. (2C)
3.4.3 For CKD 5D patients, we suggest that ESA therapy be used to
avoid having the Hb concentration fall below 9.0 g/dL (90 g/L) by
starting ESA therapy when the hemoglobin is between 9.0-10.0 g/dL
(90-100 g/L).(2B) Individualization of therapy will be necessary as
some patients may have improvements in quality of life at higher Hb
concentration and ESA therapy may be started above10.0 g/dL (100
g/L). (Not Graded)
37. Hb target
Experts of the KDIGO group concluded that levels of 9.5–11.5 g/dL were
considered associated with better outcomes than those of >13 g/dL, but that there
was no evidence either way for intermediate levels (11.5–13 g/dL)
38. USE OF ESAs AND OTHER AGENTS TO TREAT ANEMIA IN CKD
KDIGO CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE
FOR ANEMIA IN CKD
ESA MAINTENANCE THERAPY
3.5.1: In general, we suggest that ESAs not be used to maintain Hb
concentration above 11.5 g/dL (115 g/L) in adult patients with CKD. (2C)
3.5.2: Individualization of therapy will be necessary as some patients may
have improvements in quality of life at Hb concentration above 11.5 g/dL
(115 g/L) and will be prepared to accept the risks. (Not Graded)
3.6: In all adult patients, we recommend that ESAs not be used to intentionally
increase the Hb concentration above 13 g/dL (130 g/L). (1A)
39. Individualization
CONCLUSIONS
There is no single ideal target Hb for all CKD patients, but rather that such
targets will and should be tailored to the individual patient based on a
multitude of underlying factors.
40. Male 26 years
CKD after glomerulonephritis
Haemodialysis (HD)
Living renal transplantation
Professional sportsman
Women 74 years
CKD after diabetes
HD for 13 years
ESA for 12 years
2 vascular access thrombosis
2 MIs (1994 and 1997) – NYHA III CHF
Family support for mental deterioration
Cerebral scan severe diffuse atherosclerosis
Do they need to target the same Hb level
with the same therapy?
41. It's more important to know what kind of person has a
disease than to know what kind of disease this person
has
- Hippocrates
42. Disease severity
Age
Gender
lifestyle (e.g. active
vs sedentary)
Genes
Comorbidity
-Diabetes
-Stroke
-Cancer
-CV
Physiology
Iron status
Altitude residence
Inflammation
activity
Vascular Access
ESA sensitivityBlood losses
CKD
HD
Peritoneal D
Tx
The CKD population is diverse: The need of Individualization
Medication(ACE?)
Tx waiting list
De Francisco, NDT Plus (2010) 3:519–526
43. Final comment
Use IV iron wisely
Use ESA´s wisely:
- None for some
- Some for the most
- More for a few
Introduction
The NKF defines CKD according to the presence or absence of kidney damage and level of kidney function.
Key Talking Points
Chronic kidney disease is defined as structural or functional abnormalities of the kidneys for 3 months, as manifested by either
GFR &lt;60 mL/min/1.73 m2, with or without kidney damage
Kidney damage, with or without decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR), defined by
Pathologic abnormalities or
Markers of kidney damage: blood or urine abnormalities or imaging tests
Proteinuria is a reflection of kidney injury and refers to increased urinary excretion of albumin, other specific proteins, or total protein.1
GFR is widely accepted as the best overall index of kidney function in health and disease.1,2 Normal GFR varies according to age, sex, and body size; in young adults it is approximately 120 to 130 mL/min/1.73 m2 and declines with age. A decrease in GFR precedes the onset of kidney failure; therefore, a persistently reduced GFR is a specific indication of CKD.2
References
1. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39(2 suppl 1):S1-S266.
2. National Kidney Foundation—Kidney Learning System: frequently asked questions. Available at: http://www.kidney.org/kls/professionals/faq.cfm#1. Accessed June 27, 2005.
This study demonstrates that death was a far more common outcome than dialysis in all stages of CKD.
Key Talking Points
Keith and colleagues set out to understand the natural history of CKD with regard to progression to renal replacement therapy (RRT) (dialysis or transplant) and death in a representative patient population.
In 1996, 27,998 patients with estimated GFRs (eGFRs) &lt;90 mL/min/1.73 m2 on 2 separate measurements were identified from computerized medical records.
These patients were followed until either RRT, death, or disenrollment from the health plan, or until June 30, 2001.
Among the adverse outcomes for CKD patients, death is more common than RRT at any CKD stage.
The data showed that the rate of RRT over the 5-year observation period was 1.1%, 1.3%, and 19.9%, respectively, for the K/DOQI™ stages 2, 3, and 4.
However, the mortality rate was 19.5%, 24.3%, and 45.7%, respectively.
Significantly, ~46% of stage 4 CKD patients died and did not end up on RRT.
Keith and colleagues suggest that efforts to reduce mortality in this population should be focused on treatment and prevention of coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes, and anemia of CKD.
Reference
Keith DS, Nichols GA, Gullion CM, Brown JB, Smith DH. Longitudinal follow-up and outcomes among a population with chronic kidney disease in a large managed care organization. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:659-663.
Transition to Next Slide
These data suggest there should be increased predialysis management of CKD.
NOTES FOR PRESENTERS:
Key points to raise:
Iron ccorrection: usually 600–1000 mg iron for adults or equivalent doses for children (single or divided dose depending on the preparation).
Treat patients with functional iron deficiency with i.v. iron.
Peritoneal dialysis and non-dialysis patients who do not respond to oral iron will require i.v. iron.
In appropriate circumstances, iron treatment can also be administered in the community.
Recommendations 1.3.9.1 and 1.3.10.1 can be found in full in the quick reference guide and NICE guideline.
Main Point:
With a patient population of 4,038, TREAT is the largest trial to date that has studied the use of ESAs in patients with CKD, and the only placebo-controlled trial. Eligible patients had chronic kidney disease (defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] of 20 to 60 mL/minute/1.73 m2), Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and anemia (defined as a Hb level ≤ 11 g/dL).1
Background Information:
The Correction of Hemoglobin and Outcomes in Renal Insufficiency (CHOIR) trial studied 1,432 patients with an eGFR of 15 to 50 mL/minute/1.73 m2.2
The Cardiovascular Risk Reduction by Early Anemia Treatment with Epoetin Beta (CREATE) trial studied 603 patients with an eGFR of 15 to 35 mL/minute/1.73 m2.3
References:
Pfeffer MA, Burdmann EA, Chen C-Y, et al. A trial of darbepoetin alfa in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. N Engl Med. 2009;361:2019-2032.
Singh AK, Szczech L, Tang KL, et al. Correction of anemia with Epoetin alfa in chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2085-2098.
Drueke TB, Locatelli F, Clyne N, et al. Normalization of hemoglobin level in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2071-2084.
The TREAT study is the largest study performed to date, testing the hypothesis whether complete anaemia correction, using darbepoetin alfa ,may improve outcome and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD. Its results were published in November 2009 (6). This multicenter, placebo-controlled trial compared cardiovascular (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, stroke, or hospitalization for myocardial ischemia) and renal (end-stage renal disease and death) outcomes in 4038 patients with type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease not on dialysis and anaemia. The study was designed with the notion that treatment of anaemia in the early phase of CKD might produce the best results. A large separation between achieved Hb levels in the two groups, together with a large sample size, was planned in order to provide adequate statistical power (TREAT was an event-driven trial).
After a median follow-up of 29.1 months, the primary cardiovascular composite end-point occurred at a similar rate in the two groups (hazard ratio for darbepoetin alfa vs. placebo, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.17; P=0.41). Similarly findings were obtained with the other primary end-point (death or end-stage renal disease). Analysis of single components of the composite end-point showed an increased risk of fatal or nonfatal stroke in the patients with previous history of stroke ,assigned to darbepoetin alfa and a Hb target of 13g/dl. Safety data also indicated a higher frequency of death from malignancy (in patients with a previous history), and venous and arterial thromboembolic events in this group. Conversely, cardiac revascularization procedures were performed less frequently in the darbepoetin alfa than in the placebo group. Effects on quality of life were modest favouring complete anaemia correction.
It is clear from the above that achieved Hgb does not appear
to be associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Only when
Hgb is targeted to be high and this target is not achieved is the
increased cardiovascular risk seen. This is the paradox. Understanding
this paradox will allow physicians to more wisely use
erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs).
The disparity in cardiovascular event rate between achieved
and target Hgb needs explanation. Patients who were targeted
to near normal levels of Hgb often did not achieve the target
and therefore were given more ESAs to achieve these targets.
These patients were hyporesponsive to erythropoietin. This
hyporesponsiveness carried with it an increased cardiovascular
risk. What underlies this risk is unclear, but two culprits are
evident: ESAs themselves or conditions that conferred hyporesponsiveness.
Which of the two is the culprit cannot be an
swered by the present data. Although conditions that confer
hyporesponse may be the culprit, for now, for the sake of safety,
the minimum dose of ESAs to achieve the clinical goal should be
used. Not all adverse effects of ESAs are attributable to hyporesponse.
The rate of rise of Hgb and blood pressure (BP) are
discussed below. Another situation that may reflect the “offtarget”
effect of ESAs deserves special mention. ESA use among
patients with cancers can lead to metastasis and worsened
survival. Accordingly, among these patients, the use of ESAs
has been restricted by the FDA (21).
Methods
We assessed the relationship among the initial hemoglobin response to darbepoetin alfa after two weight-based doses, the hemoglobin level achieved after 4 weeks, the subsequent darbepoetin alfa dose, and outcomes in 1872 patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus who were not receiving dialysis. We defined a poor initial response to darbepoetin alfa (which occurred in 471 patients) as the lowest quartile of percent change in hemoglobin level (&lt;2%) after the first two standardized doses of the drug.
Conclusions
A poor initial hematopoietic response to darbepoetin alfa was associated with an increased subsequent risk of death or cardiovascular events as doses were escalated to meet target hemoglobin levels
Why to individualise anaemia therapy? Patients are different and thus there is no “ONE” therapeutical algorithm to treat patients
The lack of uniformity
in the findings can be explained by a variety of demographic
and methodological differences, including differences in
baseline health status, instruments, and Hb targets. Emerging
from future studies will likely be the conclusion that there is
no single ideal target Hb for all CKD patients, but rather that
such targets will and should be tailored to the individual
patient based on a multitude of underlying factors. These
factors should include, but not be limited to, the patients’
baseline quality of life, goals for improvement, and
underlying medical and specifically cardiovascular comorbidities.
Why to individualise anaemia therapy? Patients are different and thus there is no “ONE” therapeutical algorithm to treat patients
The lack of uniformity
in the findings can be explained by a variety of demographic
and methodological differences, including differences in
baseline health status, instruments, and Hb targets. Emerging
from future studies will likely be the conclusion that there is
no single ideal target Hb for all CKD patients, but rather that
such targets will and should be tailored to the individual
patient based on a multitude of underlying factors. These
factors should include, but not be limited to, the patients’
baseline quality of life, goals for improvement, and
underlying medical and specifically cardiovascular comorbidities.