An Attacker's View of Serverless and GraphQL Apps - Abhay Bhargav - AppSec California 2019
•
3 gostaram•2,468 visualizações
Serverless Technology (Functions as a Service) is fast becoming the next "big thing" in the world of distributed applications. Organizations are investing a great deal of resources in this technology as a force-multiplier, cost-saver and ops-simplification cure-all. Especially with widespread support from cloud vendors, this technology is going to only become more influential. However, like everything else, Serverless apps are subject to a a wide variety of attack possibilities, ranging from attacks against access control tech like Function Event Injection, JWTs, to NoSQL Injection, to exploits against the apps themselves (deserialization, etc) escalating privileges to other cloud component. On the other hand GraphQL (API Query Language) is the natural companion to serverless apps, where traditional REST APIs are replaced with GraphQL to provide greater flexibility, greater query parameterization and speed. GraphQL is slowly negating the need for REST APIs from being developed. Combined with Serverless tech/Reactive Front-end frameworks, GraphQL is very powerful for distributed apps. However, GraphQL can be abused with a variety of attacks including but not limited to Injection Attacks, Nested Resource Exhaustion attacks, Authorization Flaws among others. This talk presents a red-team perspective of the various ways in which testers can discover and exploit serverless and/or GraphQL driven applications to compromise sensitive information, and gain a deeper foothold into database services, IAM services and other other cloud components. The talk will have some demos that will demonstrate practical attacks and attack possibilities against Serverless and GraphQL applications.
Recomendados
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Mais procurados
Mais procurados (20)
Semelhante a An Attacker's View of Serverless and GraphQL Apps - Abhay Bhargav - AppSec California 2019
Semelhante a An Attacker's View of Serverless and GraphQL Apps - Abhay Bhargav - AppSec California 2019 (20)
Último
Último (20)
An Attacker's View of Serverless and GraphQL Apps - Abhay Bhargav - AppSec California 2019
- 1. An Attacker’s View of Serverless and GraphQL Abhay Bhargav - we45 Copyright - we45, 2019 abhaybhargav
- 2. abhaybhargav Yours Truly • Founder @ we45 • Chief Architect - Orchestron • Avid Pythonista and AppSec Automation Junkie • Speaker at DEF CON, BlackHat, OWASP Events, etc world-wide • Lead Trainer - we45 Training and Workshops • Co-author of Secure Java For Web Application Development • Author of PCI Compliance: A Definitive Guide Copyright - we45, 2019
- 3. abhaybhargav Copyright - we45, 2018
- 4. abhaybhargav Get ready! Copyright - we45, 2018
- 5. abhaybhargav Get ready! Copyright - we45, 2018
- 6. abhaybhargav Get ready! Copyright - we45, 2018
- 7. abhaybhargav Today’s Session • A Gentle Introduction to Serverless (FaaS) and GraphQL • Attacker’s view of FaaS • Attacker’s View of GraphQL • Demos • FIN Copyright - we45, 2018
- 8. abhaybhargav As always, I pray to the demo gods! Copyright - we45, 2018
- 10. abhaybhargav Moving FaaSter! Copyright - we45, 2018 Monolith Microservice Function
- 11. abhaybhargav What is FaaS? Copyright - we45, 2018
- 12. abhaybhargav What is FaaS? • Functions that are triggered via events => Triggering a Container/VM Copyright - we45, 2018
- 13. abhaybhargav What is FaaS? • Functions that are triggered via events => Triggering a Container/VM • Execute (thing) Copyright - we45, 2018
- 14. abhaybhargav What is FaaS? • Functions that are triggered via events => Triggering a Container/VM • Execute (thing) • The container/VM freezes post execution and kills Copyright - we45, 2018
- 15. abhaybhargav What is FaaS? • Functions that are triggered via events => Triggering a Container/VM • Execute (thing) • The container/VM freezes post execution and kills • Repeat Copyright - we45, 2018
- 16. abhaybhargav Summary Copyright - we45, 2018 Function •Short lived •No ports •No state •Single purpose
- 18. abhaybhargav Lifecycle Copyright - we45, 2018 Containers/MicroVMs are “thawed” when they are invoked again Additional Containers/MicroVMs are spawned based on concurrent invocations Function is invoked launching a container to run. Destroyed after. Deploy into Lambda with zip file
- 21. What is GraphQL? • API Query Language => instead of REST API • (Usually) single endpoint to query and insert (mutate) data for the API • Query/Mutate exactly what you want • Multiple Resources in a Single Request • PubSub Functionality for Realtime Data
- 22. REST vs GraphQL
- 23. REST vs GraphQL re_path(r'^media/(?P<path>.*)$', MediaServeView.as_view()), re_path(r'^api/user/password/change/(?P<email>.*)/$', UserUtilityView.as_view({'post':'change_password'})), re_path(r'^api/user/token/', obtain_jwt_token), re_path(r'^api/user/profile/', UserProfileView.as_view()), re_path(r'^api/users/list/$', UserListView.as_view({'get':'list'}),name='user_list'), re_path(r'^api/organizations/list/$', OrganizationListView.as_view({'get':'list'}),name='org_list'), re_path(r'^api/projects/list/$', ProjectListView.as_view({'get':'list'}),name='pro_list'), re_path(r'^api/applications/list/$', ApplicationListView.as_view({'get':'list'}),name='app_list'), re_path(r'^api/users/$', UserView.as_view({'get':'list','put':'create'}),name='user'), re_path(r'^api/users/(?P<pk>d+)/$', UserView.as_view({'get':'retrieve','post':'update','delete':'destroy'}),name='ind_user'), re_path(r'^api/tools/$', OptionsListView.as_view({'get':'tools'}),name='tools'), re_path(r'^api/hosttypes/$', OptionsListView.as_view({'get':'hosttypes'}),name='hosttypes'), re_path(r'^api/platforms/$', OptionsListView.as_view({'get':'platforms'}),name='platforms'), re_path(r'^api/permissions/$', OptionsListView.as_view({'get':'permissions'}),name='permissions'),
- 24. GraphQL const app = express(); const PORT = 3000; app.use('/graphql', graphlHTTP({ schema: schema, graphiql: true, }));
- 25. GraphQL
- 26. GraphQL Architecture Source: Apollo Server
- 27. GraphQL Terminology •Schemas and Types: •Define Object Types and Fields (Objects and Attributes •Queries => Select Statements •Mutations => Insert/Update Statements •Scalar => Custom Data Types •Resolver => Function that translates the type system to DB queries
- 30. abhaybhargav
- 31. abhaybhargav
- 32. abhaybhargav
- 33. abhaybhargav
- 34. abhaybhargav
- 35. abhaybhargav
- 36. abhaybhargav
- 37. abhaybhargav
- 38. abhaybhargav
- 39. abhaybhargav Super-easy to deploy service: gql-sql-injection package: exclude: - node_modules - package-lock.json provider: name: aws runtime: nodejs8.10 timeout: 30 functions: graphql: handler: app.handler timeout: 30 events: - http: path: graphql method: post cors: false
- 40. abhaybhargav Security Considerations - FaaS • No* Frameworks => Back to Plain ol’ platform code • No Network Attack Surface • Observability/Debugging is a challenge • Events from Multiple Sources • Highly disciplined approach to Architecture Copyright - we45, 2018
- 41. abhaybhargav reading between the lines….
- 42. abhaybhargav Considerations - FaaS • No* Frameworks => Back to Plain ol’ platform code • No Network Attack Surface • Observability/Debugging is a challenge • Highly disciplined approach to Architecture Copyright - we45, 2018
- 43. abhaybhargav Considerations - FaaS • No* Frameworks => Back to Plain ol’ platform code • No Network Attack Surface • Observability/Debugging is a challenge • Highly disciplined approach to Architecture Copyright - we45, 2018 •No Batteries included Security Features (Frameworks)
- 44. abhaybhargav Considerations - FaaS • No* Frameworks => Back to Plain ol’ platform code • No Network Attack Surface • Observability/Debugging is a challenge • Highly disciplined approach to Architecture Copyright - we45, 2018 •No Batteries included Security Features (Frameworks) •DIY Validation
- 45. abhaybhargav Considerations - FaaS • No* Frameworks => Back to Plain ol’ platform code • No Network Attack Surface • Observability/Debugging is a challenge • Highly disciplined approach to Architecture Copyright - we45, 2018 •No Batteries included Security Features (Frameworks) •DIY Validation •Access Control per Function
- 46. abhaybhargav Considerations - FaaS • No* Frameworks => Back to Plain ol’ platform code • No Network Attack Surface • Observability/Debugging is a challenge • Highly disciplined approach to Architecture Copyright - we45, 2018 •No Batteries included Security Features (Frameworks) •DIY Validation •Access Control per Function •Logging Per Function
- 47. abhaybhargav Considerations - FaaS • No* Frameworks => Back to Plain ol’ platform code • No Network Attack Surface • Observability/Debugging is a challenge • Highly disciplined approach to Architecture Copyright - we45, 2018 •No Batteries included Security Features (Frameworks) •DIY Validation •Access Control per Function •Logging Per Function •and other things we don’t too too well…..
- 48. abhaybhargav Considerations - FaaS • No* Frameworks => Back to Plain ol’ platform code • No Network Attack Surface •Observability/Debugging is a challenge • Highly disciplined approach to Architecture Copyright - we45, 2018
- 49. abhaybhargav Considerations - FaaS • No* Frameworks => Back to Plain ol’ platform code • No Network Attack Surface •Observability/Debugging is a challenge • Highly disciplined approach to Architecture Copyright - we45, 2018 •Monitoring Attacks is a challenge unless you architect for it
- 50. abhaybhargav Considerations - FaaS • No* Frameworks => Back to Plain ol’ platform code • No Network Attack Surface •Observability/Debugging is a challenge • Highly disciplined approach to Architecture Copyright - we45, 2018 •Monitoring Attacks is a challenge unless you architect for it •Security Logging => FUHGEDDABOUDIT!
- 51. abhaybhargav Considerations - FaaS • No* Frameworks => Back to Plain ol’ platform code • No Network Attack Surface • Observability/Debugging is a challenge •Events from Multiple Sources Copyright - we45, 2018
- 52. abhaybhargav Considerations - FaaS • No* Frameworks => Back to Plain ol’ platform code • No Network Attack Surface • Observability/Debugging is a challenge •Events from Multiple Sources Copyright - we45, 2018 •Functions triggered from events like S3, SNS, SQS,etc
- 53. abhaybhargav Considerations - FaaS • No* Frameworks => Back to Plain ol’ platform code • No Network Attack Surface • Observability/Debugging is a challenge •Events from Multiple Sources Copyright - we45, 2018 •Functions triggered from events like S3, SNS, SQS,etc •Larger Attack Surface
- 54. abhaybhargav Considerations - FaaS • No* Frameworks => Back to Plain ol’ platform code • No Network Attack Surface • Observability/Debugging is a challenge •Events from Multiple Sources Copyright - we45, 2018 •Functions triggered from events like S3, SNS, SQS,etc •Larger Attack Surface •Traditional Security Controls - WAFs, etc may be ineffective
- 55. abhaybhargav Considerations - FaaS • No* Frameworks => Back to Plain ol’ platform code • No Network Attack Surface • Observability/Debugging is a challenge •Events from Multiple Sources Copyright - we45, 2018 •Functions triggered from events like S3, SNS, SQS,etc •Larger Attack Surface •Traditional Security Controls - WAFs, etc may be ineffective •DAST/Testing is hard to exec
- 56. abhaybhargav Useful Projects for Serverless Security Copyright - we45, 2018
- 57. abhaybhargav Attacker’s View of FaaS
- 58. abhaybhargav Routes to FaaS pwnage! • Attacking Function (and cloud provider) through non-API Gateway Events • Attacking Function (and Cloud Provider) through API (Web Services Attacks) • Identifying Vulnerabilities with IAM and Privileges => Elevation of Privs • Information Disclosure => Database Access, etc • Denial of Service Copyright - we45, 2018
- 59. abhaybhargav Function Data Event Injection
- 60. abhaybhargav What is Event Injection? • Injection Attacks triggered through Third party event notifications • Example: • File Uploaded to S3 • Message sent over Notification Service • Message received on Queue • DynamoDB Stream Events, • etc Copyright - we45, 2018
- 61. abhaybhargav Function Data Event Injection • Injection is back!! • Multiple Possibilities with Functions: • Insecure Deserialization • XXE • SQL Injection • NoSQL Injection • Server-Side Request Forgery • Template Injection
- 62. abhaybhargav Function Data Event Injection - Sources Command Injection SQL/NoSQL Injection Insecure Deserialization XXE
- 63. abhaybhargav Case Study User uploads XML laced with malware File Stores in Amazon S3 Notification triggers function Function reads uploaded file, XXE executes Attacker gains access
- 65. abhaybhargav Challenges - Function Data Event Injection • Hard to test for => Execution is largely Out-of-Band • Hard to Protect with WAFs (other Network Security) => Several non-HTTP Protocols can be used to trigger this • Wide variety of execution scenarios
- 66. abhaybhargav Privilege Escalation - IAM Misconfiguration
- 67. abhaybhargav IAM & Other Misconfigurations • Permissions are often the greatest bugbear in a FaaS implementation • Devs tend to provide overly permissive capabilities for resources that interact with FaaS implementations • Permissions are usually set in cloud IAM environments with Policies, Roles, etc • This includes misconfigurations like Public S3 buckets and access to all DynamoDB tables, etc
- 68. abhaybhargav Examples of IAM - Effect: Allow Action: - 'dynamodb:*' Resource: - 'arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:****************:table/TABLE_NAME' Allows ALL actions on a DynamoDB Table - Effect: Allow Action: - dynamodb:PutItem Resource: 'arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:****************:table/TABLE_NAME' Only PUT allowed on Table
- 69. abhaybhargav DynamoDB Injection client.scan(TableName = 'dynamo-user', Select = 'ALL_ATTRIBUTES', ScanFilter = { 'first_name': {"AttributeValueList": [{"S": "Joe"}], "ComparisonOperator": "EQ"} }) Standard “scan” with DynamoDBEQ|NE|IN|LE|LT|GE|GT|BETWEEN| NOT_NULL|NULL|CONTAINS| NOT_CONTAINS|BEGINS_WITH client.scan(TableName = 'dynamo-user', Select = 'ALL_ATTRIBUTES', ScanFilter = {'first_name': {"AttributeValueList": [{"S": "*"}], "ComparisonOperator": "GT"}}) Equivalent of ‘OR 1=1, Retrieves all values from the Table
- 71. abhaybhargav Other Weaknesses • Authorization Weaknesses especially with JSON Web Tokens (JWTs) • Denial of Service Attacks based on Library weaknesses • Dynamic Testing is a major challenge for Serverless Functions • SAST/SCA becomes the way to go. But gets hard with multiple language implementations Copyright - we45, 2018
- 72. abhaybhargav Attacker’s view of GraphQL
- 73. abhaybhargav Security Considerations - GraphQL Copyright - we45, 2018
- 74. abhaybhargav Security Considerations - GraphQL • Access Control Copyright - we45, 2018
- 75. abhaybhargav Security Considerations - GraphQL • Access Control • Input Validation Copyright - we45, 2018
- 76. abhaybhargav Security Considerations - GraphQL • Access Control • Input Validation • Query Whitelisting Copyright - we45, 2018
- 77. abhaybhargav Security Considerations - GraphQL • Access Control • Input Validation • Query Whitelisting • Rate Limiting Copyright - we45, 2018
- 78. abhaybhargav Security Considerations - GraphQL • Access Control • Input Validation • Query Whitelisting • Rate Limiting Copyright - we45, 2018 }
- 79. abhaybhargav Security Considerations - GraphQL • Access Control • Input Validation • Query Whitelisting • Rate Limiting Copyright - we45, 2018 }
- 80. abhaybhargav Attacker’s View of GraphQL Copyright - we45, 2018
- 81. abhaybhargav Attacker’s View of GraphQL • Similar set of flaws as you would see with any other Web App/Web Service Copyright - we45, 2018
- 82. abhaybhargav Attacker’s View of GraphQL • Similar set of flaws as you would see with any other Web App/Web Service • Authorization Flaws and Info Disclosure Flaws take center-stage Copyright - we45, 2018
- 83. abhaybhargav Attacker’s View of GraphQL • Similar set of flaws as you would see with any other Web App/Web Service • Authorization Flaws and Info Disclosure Flaws take center-stage • NoSQL Flaws might be big with GraphQL Apps Copyright - we45, 2018
- 84. abhaybhargav Attacker’s View of GraphQL • Similar set of flaws as you would see with any other Web App/Web Service • Authorization Flaws and Info Disclosure Flaws take center-stage • NoSQL Flaws might be big with GraphQL Apps • Make Denial-of-Service Great Again! Copyright - we45, 2018
- 91. abhaybhargav Anyone remember Mass Assignment? Copyright - we45, 2018
- 94. abhaybhargav Injection with GraphQL • Unlike REST (single query per function), GraphQL resolvers are written for a larger query space • With NoSQL databases, this could lead to injection (and probably RCE) if Dynamic Scripting is enabled (Mongo, Elasticsearch, etc) Copyright - we45, 2018
- 96. abhaybhargav DoS
- 97. abhaybhargav Nested Queries - Resource Exhaustion • Nested Queries with Many to Many Fields can be easily scaled to “high cost” queries • When coupled with FaaS invocations, can really add up the costs Copyright - we45, 2018
- 98. abhaybhargav Demo Copyright - we45, 2018
- 99. abhaybhargav Conclusions • Serverless and GraphQL Stacks are going to be big moving forward • Developers need to largely DIY Implementations => Few Frameworks today! • Security Tooling => Needs to catch up a WHOLE LOT MORE! Copyright - we45, 2018
- 100. abhaybhargav Thanks! •Twitter: @abhaybhargav •Website and Blog: www.we45.com •Product: www.orchestron.io Copyright - we45, 2018