Division Meeting - Feb. 25, 2022
University of South Carolina Division of Student Affairs and Academic Support
presenters:
Megan Colascione, Student Life, Staff Senate
Pam Bowers, Planning, Assessment and Innovation
Jennifer Keup, National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition
2. CONGRATULATIONS FEBRUARY GEMS WINNERS
GEM Recipients
Ambra Hiott Student Life – Leadership & Service Center
Anna Edwards Student Life
Katie Hopkins Student Success - University 101 Programs
Kirsten Kennedy Student Housing & Sustainability
Dan Friedman Student Success - University 101 Programs
Steven Huber Student Housing & Sustainability
Scott McDonald Student Success – Student Success Center
Joshua Schuman Student Life – Fraternity & Sorority Life
Kat Yoffie Dean of Students – Student Conduct & Academic
Integrity
Nominator Recipient
Rachel Taylor Student Life – Leadership & Service Center
3. 2022 OUTSTANDING ADVOCATE FOR FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS AWARD
• Award Description: The Outstanding Advocate for
First-Year Students Award recognizes individuals
who have made significant and extraordinary
contributions to the development of the academic,
professional, and/or personal lives of first-year
students.
• Who can be nominated? All University of South
Carolina – Columbia faculty, staff, and students
are eligible for this award.
• Recipient Recognition: The award recipient will
receive a $1,000 award and a plaque recognizing
this exceptional achievement.
• Direct any questions to Catherine Flowers
(cdflower@mailbox.sc.edu)
5. DSAAS BENEFITS FEEDBACK:
TOP 5 AREAS
1.Free or Reduced Parking
Permits
2.Medical Insurance with no
co-pay or annual deductible
3.Modified Summer Work
Schedule
4.Flexible use of sick leave as
wellness leave
5.Increased tuition assistance
options
STAFF SENATE BENEFITS
FEEDBACK: TOP 5 AREAS
1.Free or Reduced Parking
Permits
2.Medical Insurance with no
co-pay or annual deductible
3.Modified Summer Work
Schedule
4.Better Dental Coverage
5.(TIED) Paid Parental Leave
6.(TIED) Flexible use of sick
leave as wellness leave
6. STAFF SENATE
• Staff Senate is hosting a “Top 5”
drive for the Gamecock Pantry
from March 7 – 9
• Any donation helps!
• Questions? Please contact
Senators Katherine Hilson or Joe
Fortune for more information.
7. NEXT STAFF SENATE MEETING
• Tuesday, March 8 @ 3 p.m.
• Close-Hipp Building Lumpkin Auditorium (8th floor)
• or attend on Microsoft Teams via Staff Senate website
• More agenda information here:
https://sc.edu/about/offices_and_divisions/staff_senate/index.php
Connect with your DSAAS Senators: sasenators@sc.edu
13. National Association of
Colleges and Employers
(NACE)
Job Outlook 2022 survey
forecasts hiring intentions of
employers regarding new
college grads
https://www.naceweb.org/
>
>
>
>
>
>
Attributes
documented
in UofSC
Experience
transcript
14. Beyond The
Classroom Matters
14
Purpose: Improve quality of institutional data on student engagement and
learning in the co-curriculum, in order to improve:
Quality of co-curricular programs, services, events, activities
Evidence of educational impact
Visibility of educational purpose and design (intentions and methods)
16. Beyond The
Classroom Matters
16
Design:
Engagement: a co-curricular program, event, or activity cataloged and
recorded in the BTCM system
Engagement Catalog – records educational purpose and design
elements of each Engagement
Records Repository – records student participation in an Engagement,
as defined in the Engagement Catalog
17. Beyond The Classroom Matters: Processes and tools to
catalog Engagements, record student participation, and interface BTCM records
with students academic and demographic records.
My UofSC Experience: Each student’s Engagement records; student
(and advisor) can access their records online at my.sc.edu
UofSC Experience Transcript: University report of a student’s
Engagement records, sent at student’s request to prospective employers and
graduate schools
18. • BTCM Purpose (intended outcomes): Improve quality of institutional data on student engagement
and learning in the co-curriculum, in order to improve quality, evidence, visibility
• Indicators of achievement of purpose / intended outcomes
• Engagement Catalog makes purpose and design visible
• Student records and transcript increase visibility of the role of the co-curriculum
• Engagement Data informs analysis of Engagement quality/effectiveness
• Numbers and characteristics of participants
• Are students participating in expected numbers?
• Is target audience engaged (for example, 1st generation students, transfer students?)
• Engagement Data informs institution-level analysis of educational impact
• How does co-curricular engagement contribute to student persistence? Timely graduation? Post-
graduation employment? Graduate school admission? Alumni satisfaction?
18
19. PURPOSE: Improve quality/effectiveness, evidence of impact,
visibility of educational purpose and intentional design
• BTCM Engagement Catalog
• UofSC Experience Transcript – Example
• Student resources - how to access records, create and order transcript
• Interactive Dashboards - characteristics of student participants
• Toolbox for Engagement Catalog Entries – how to submit Engagements to catalog
• BTCM reports – Engagements and participant numbers by department / unit
• Student Records – Engagement providers access to their participant records
19
26. 26
Engagement Providers can access student records here: https://www.sc.edu/btcmatters/forms/
- Click on “Verification” then click on student icon to see records (example below)
27. Fall 2018 Columbia Undergraduate Degree-Seeking Students
BTCM Engagement Combination in Fall 2018 Rate of Return in Fall 2019 Head Count Fall 2018
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Freshman Sophomore Freshman Sophomore
+ + + 97.14% 94.12% 35 119
+ + 91.45% 93.51% 2,598 1,542
+ 73.46% 93.62% 765 1,881
+ + 90% 98.11% 10 53
+ 84.06% 84.54% 1,380 983
+ + 85.71% 92.98% 14 57
+ 50% 95.24% 2 21
66% 86.33% 1,391 1,792
Table illustrates retention (for the Fall 2019 term) of Fall 2018 freshmen and sophomores who completed various Tier combinations of BTCM recorded
Engagements.
* 2,598 freshmen completed at least one Tier 1 AND one Tier 2 Engagement; 91.45% returned for Fall 2019.
* 1,380 freshmen completed at least one Tier 2 Engagement; 84.06% returned for Fall 2019.
* 1,391 freshmen completed NO recorded Engagements; 66% returned for Fall 2019.
Source: Jonathan Poon, Office of Institutional Research, Assessment & Analytics.
Freshman Engagement and Return for Sophomore Year
28. Success is
defined as
graduating in
Spring or
Summer 2019
or returning to
UofSC for the
Fall 2019 Term.
Source: Jonathan Poon, Office of Institutional
Research, Assessment & Analytics.
30. 30
I enhanced skills in
organization, listening,
empathy, communication,
collaboration, feedback,
facilitation, public
speaking, and a plethora
of other skills
I learned how to
develop and maintain
a professional attitude
on the job.
how individual identity plays
a role in how people think
and act, how to have open
and honest discussions
about controversial topics
“Briefly describe knowledge you gained and/or skills you developed from your participation”
Selected responses from survey of Fall 2021 ELO-designated, SAAS Engagements
I gained a lot of
experience in working
as part of a team and
forming good
communication skills /
habits.
confidence in
how I present
myself and what
I am passionate
about
33. DR. JENNIFER KEUP
Executive Director of the National Resource Center for The First-Year
Experience and Students in Transition
34.
35. How to Stay HIP:
Understanding and Using HIPs
in our Student Affairs Work
Jennifer R. Keup
Executive Director,
National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition
February 25, 2022 keupj@mailbox.sc.edu; X7-2570
36. High-impact practices (HIPs)
were first introduced in 2005
and have shaped higher
education policy, pedagogy, and
principles since that time. This
session will provide a current
check-in on HIPs, including how
they’ve evolved, their equity
potential, and the role of
student affairs in their
development and delivery.
39. High-Impact/Promising Practices…
“…are curricular and cocurricular
structures that tend to draw upon high-
quality pedagogies and practices in pursuit
of 21st century learning outcomes; they
are “teaching and learning practices that
have been widely tested and have been
shown to be beneficial for college
students.” (Kuh, 2008)
40. • Represent intentional and integrative learning experiences
• Structures rather than program
• Intentional connection to outcomes that go beyond retention
• Have the potential to shape campus culture
High-Impact/Promising Practices…
41.
42. • Represent intentional and integrative learning experiences
• Structures rather than program
• Intentional connection to outcomes that go beyond retention
• Have the potential to shape campus culture
• May be able to “compensate for shortcomings in academic
preparation”
• Greater impact on historically underserved students
High-Impact/Promising Practices…
46. Deep Learning General Gains Personal Gains Practical Gains
FY SR FY SR FY SR FY SR
Learning
Community
+++ ++ ++ ++
Service Learning +++ ++ ++ +++ +++ +++ ++ ++
Study Abroad ++ + ++
Undergrad
Research
+++ ++ ++ ++
Senior Capstone ++ ++ +++ ++
48. “There is a positive
relationship between…the
number of particular high-
impact practices students
experience and students’
engagement.”
(McKlenney, 2013)
49. HIPs and Deep Learning Experiences
51%
57%
64%
71%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
No HIPs 1-2 HIPs 3-4 HIPs 5-6 HIPs
59. “While promising, they are not a
panacea. Only when they are
implemented well and continually
evaluated…will we realize their
considerable potential.”
(Kuh in Brownell & Swaner, 2010)
Consider Quality of HIPs
61. Characteristics of HIPs
• Creates an investment of time and energy
• Includes interaction with faculty and peers about
substantive matters
• Real-world applications
• High expectations
• Includes frequent feedback
• Exposure to diverse perspectives
• Demands reflection and integrated learning
• Public displays of accountability
62. Metrics of Quality
• Creates an investment of time and energy
• Includes interaction with faculty and peers about
substantive matters
• Real-world applications
• High expectations
• Includes frequent feedback
• Exposure to diverse perspectives
• Demands reflection and integrated learning
• Public displays of accountability
63. “[HIP] key conditions can be adapted and
incorporated into any teaching and learning
situation inside or outside the classroom to
promote higher levels of student
performance. There are doubtless other
high-impact activities…in which large
number of students participate.”
(Kuh in Brownell & Swaner, 2010)
64. • Creates an investment of time and
energy
• Includes interaction with faculty and
peers about substantive matters
• Real-world applications
• High expectations
• Includes frequent feedback
• Exposure to diverse perspectives
• Demands reflection and integrated
learning
• Public displays of accountability
What are common
student
experiences that
have the potential
to become HIPs?
65. Emergent and Potential HIPs
• Campus activities
• Employment
• Student media
• Advising
• Athletics
• Physical fitness and wellness
• Supplemental Instruction
• Classroom pedagogy
• Housing and Res Life
• Student clubs and groups
• Peer leadership
• Common reading
• Housing & residential life
• “Transactional” experiences
• Course registration
• Enrollment management
• Financial aid
• Library
66.
67. • Creates an investment of time and
energy
• Includes interaction with faculty and
peers about substantive matters
• Real-world applications
• High expectations
• Includes frequent feedback
• Exposure to diverse perspectives
• Demands reflection and integrated
learning
• Public displays of accountability
How are your
programs
measuring up to
HIPs
characteristics?
69. • Represent intentional and integrative learning experiences
• Structures rather than program
• Intentional connection to outcomes that go beyond retention
• Have the potential to shape campus culture
• May be able to “compensate for shortcomings in academic
preparation”
• Greater impact on historically underserved students
Remember This? HIPs...
70. “The most valuable finding [is] the ‘equity
effects’ that appear in students’ report of their
learning as their success is boosted by HIPs; the
equity-minded perspective that educators can
nurture; the principles of inclusive excellence
that can guide colleges and universities in
providing a liberal education that offers not only
equitable access to HIPs, but also equitable
achievement of outcomes.”
(Schneider & Albertine, 2013)
73. Considerations for HIPs and Equity
• Unequal pathways to HIPs
• Differential participation rates
• “Invisible” identity areas
• HIPs as spaces of privilege; need
to reframe
• Structures reify racialized and
other discriminatory practices
75. HIPs Takeaways
• HIPs are evolving and can be inclusive of student affairs practices
• HIPs characteristics are a tool for development, interrogation,
and assessment of our practices
• HIPs have great equity potential but need our help to meet it
• Student affairs is a key partner and advocate in the thoughtful
development and equitable delivery of HIPs
76.
77. “Instead of a list of distinct practices,
we would offer that the idea of high-
impact practices is an invitation to
continue working to identify and
verify which practices are indeed the
best to which we can aspire and
actually implement given practical
limitations.”
(Hatch, Crisp, & Wesley, p. 16)
78.
79. WHAT’S DENNIS READING? DISCUSSION
• Monthly discussions allow staff an informal opportunity to
discuss the news stories that have caught the attention of Dr.
Pruitt and the ones that have piqued their own interest.
• Thursday, March 3 from 9-10 a.m. via Microsoft Teams
• Register on the PD Team website to receive Teams link
80. 2022 DIVISION AWARDS
• Now accepting nominations!
• Nominations close March 15th
• Details & forms on the PD
Team website
• Nomination form redesigned
• Each form submission is for a
single award nomination
• Each award nomination can
have up to 5 people/offices
listed
• Scoring rubrics have been
added to the
award descriptions
• Division Awards Breakfast hosted
on Fri. 4/29 in RHUU
81. 2022-2023 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT TEAM
• Interested in serving on 2022-2023
PD Team?
• Opportunities to develop & enhance skills
• Increased connection w/ campus
resources
• Opportunities for professional growth &
progress towards career goals
• Increased sense of belonging
• Apply on our website now
• Have served at least one year in your role
• Have approval from supervisor
• Speak with one of our
current members
• Tad Derrick
• Lauren Martini Olson
• Melody Boland
• Lauren Epps
• Patrick Flynn
• Jason Halterman
• Jessie McNevin
• Michelle Otero
• Jennifer Pizolongo
• Josh Schuman
82. STUDENT AFFAIRS NIGHT AT FOUNDERS
• Join your SAAS colleagues at the
Gamecock Baseball game
• Tuesday, March 29 @ 7p vs Presbyterian College
• Register in advance to receive a food
voucher
• Hot dog, popcorn & soft drink
• Must have your Carolina Card
• Your Carolina Card gets you access to 2 free
faculty/staff tickets
• Must register by Friday, March 18 to be
eligible for food voucher
• First come first serve
84. QUESTIONS, THANKS & ASSESSMENT
• Questions?
• Ask in Q&A or send email to
sapdteam@mailbox.sc.edu
• Thank You for Attending
• Next Meeting Friday, March 25th
• In-person (RHUU Theater) & live-stream option
• Assessment
• Please scan QR code or click link in
Take 3 email to provide feedback to
PD Team
Notas do Editor
When choosing between two otherwise equally qualified candidates, employers deem having an internship with its organization or within its industry to be the most influential factors, according to NACE’s Job Outlook 2022 report.
Those attributes, however, were the only two that employers consider to have “very much influence.” Furthermore, while this has been the case over the past three years, the influence of both attributes has waned slightly since 2020.
While the drop in the influence of grade point average has been reported and continues here, the influence of a candidate holding a leadership position is also down since 2020.
The Job Outlook survey is a forecast of hiring intentions of employers as they relate to new college graduates. Data for the Job Outlook 2022 survey were collected from August 18, 2021, through October 1, 2021. Of the 157 total respondents, 116 were NACE employer members, representing 15.7 percent of eligible member respondents. The Job Outlook 2022 survey was also distributed to nonmember companies from which an additional 41 responses were received. The Job Outlook 2022 report is available in MyNACE.
2 critical notes about student records –
The educator responsible for an Engagement must correctly identify each student.
These are official student education records, that can be reported on an official university experiential transcript, bearing the seal of the University and the registrar’s signature.
To assure systematic and accurate identification of students and collection of records, the method should minimize manual processing of records. BTCM staff will help determine the best method.
So pleased to be here.
Thanks to
How many of you have heard of the Center?
This growth in a base of scholarship and best practice really positioned FYS well and gave them traction in the higher education landscape.
So much so that when AAC&U released their list of 10 high-impact practices as part of their LEAP project (Liberal Education and America’s Promise), LC were on it.
Really a sign that these programs have become institutionalized.
This growth in a base of scholarship and best practice really positioned FYS well and gave them traction in the higher education landscape.
So much so that when AAC&U released their list of 10 high-impact practices as part of their LEAP project (Liberal Education and America’s Promise), LC were on it.
Really a sign that these programs have become institutionalized.
This growth in a base of scholarship and best practice really positioned FYS well and gave them traction in the higher education landscape.
So much so that when AAC&U released their list of 10 high-impact practices as part of their LEAP project (Liberal Education and America’s Promise), LC were on it.
Really a sign that these programs have become institutionalized.
I want to spend our remaining time here today talking about what it really means to be a high-impact practice.
From Sanford’s “Why Colleges Fail?” (p. 53):
“Readiness [is] the notion that certain kinds of responses can be made only after certain states or conditions have been built up in the person.”
(p. 54): ”Whatever the stage of readiness in the personality, further development will not occur until stimuli arrive to upset the exiting equilibrium and require fresh adaptation. What the state of readiness means, most essentially, is that the individual is now open to new kinds of stimuli and prepared to deal with them in an adaptive manner.”