SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 31
Signal Processing of SAR
Detection Algorithm
SAR Signal Specifications:
The LFM signal equation has same form in spatial and frequency domain.
Range frequency in LFM has direct relation with range frequency:
f  Kr . t
If t change from 0 to T, f change from 0 to BW.
f = BW
f = 0 Hz
t = Tt = 0
SAR Signals:
Strip-map mode
Moving direction (Nadir line)
Delay time in receive signal
The plane in moving during send and receive.
Doppler effect and plane’s moving makes
SAR system complex.
Range Cell Migration is to find exact place of
the surface where the receive signal hit it and
reflect.
SAR Signals and RCM:
Complexity hierarchical
1. Line beam, no movement
2. Line beam, with movement
3. Antenna beam, no movement (-)
4. Antenna beam, with movement(+)
(-): Pulse-signal SAR (Doppler effect)
stop-and-go situation
(+): LFM-CW SAR
SAR Processing Algorithms
Range Doppler Algorithm
Chirp Scaling Algorithm
Omega-K Algorithm
SAR Processing Algorithm
Send and Received Signals:
Signal Bandwidth is defined by pulse duration and Kr parameter.
The echo signal multiply by reference signal and digitized by ADC.
*
Redc Transmit ceiveS S S= ×
rBandWidth K
T
τ
= ×
De-chirp Signal Bandwidth:
Frequency Domain:
Bandwidth shift by center of image, using Lowpass filter
Range bandwidth:
Plane height = 1000 m
Plane speed = 50 m/s
Plane angle = 50 degree
Squint angle = 0
Range variations from 1300 to 2000 meter
De-chirp Signal Bandwidth is determined by SAR range of detection.
The echo signal multiply by reference signal and digitized by ADC.
2
0 0 0 0 0( , , , ) ( , ) exp( 2 )dc r rS t r s r s j f j K j K tτ σ π τ π τ π τ= × ∆ − ∆ + ∆
2
0 0 0( ) ( , ) exp( 2 ) exp( 2 )dc r rF S r s j f j K j K t j ft dtσ π τ π τ π τ π= × ∆ − ∆ + ∆ × −∫
De-chirp Signal Bandwidth:
Range frequency:
Bandwidth = 1 MHz
Range variations from 1300 to 2000 meter
Delay is dictated by slant range:
Range frequency spectrum:
Stationary-Phase Principle:
POSP is used to approximate Fourier transform in Azimuth direction.
Stationary-Phase Principle:
Phase-Stationary to get a mathematical view to Fourier transform of De-chirp signal
For example:
2
0 0 0( , ) exp( 2 2 ) exp( 2 ).dc r r sSf r s j f j K j K t j f t dtσ π τ π τ π τ π= × ∆ − ∆ + ∆ × −∫
2
02 2 2fourier r r s sf K K t f tθ π τ π τ π τ π= ∆ − ∆ + ∆ −
2 2 2
022 sr v tR
c c
τ
+
= =
' 0
d
dt
θ
θ = =
Phase-Stationary is a place where amplitude variation is ignorable against phase
variation.
2
0 0 0 0 0( , , , ) ( , ) exp( 2 )dc r rS t r s r s j f j K j K tτ σ π τ π τ π τ= × ∆ − ∆ + ∆
Taylor approximation used to linear azimuth and range in formula
Taylor approximations:
Taylor approximations can be used
Taylor approximations:
Considering phase of Fourier transform, it composed of three nonlinearity need to be
solved before proceeding.
The first term is modulation of azimuth , the second is RCM which is linear
to range frequency, and the last is secondary range compression. Each part must be
compensated to derive a phase in two in-depended dimension.
These nonlinearities and dependencies can be solved in frequency domain or by
changing the variables and domains. The second is defined as w-k algorithm. In this
method the range and azimuth frequency domain change to w-k domain which in the
new domain the domains are orthogonal too.
In w-k algorithm the Reference Function Multiply is used for decoupling, and created
in w-k domain.
Reference Function Multiply
Reference function multiply In w-k algorithm
Rc is the slant range from plane to center of the target scene
Rc is the center of Bandwidth in range’s Fourier transform
Reference function multiply change the phase of signal by distance from Rc
Focusing in LFM-CW Omega-K :
Returning from w-k domain by inverse Fourier transform:
The position of the target appear as a spike function (Delta) in range-azimuth domain.
The Phase Stationary algorithm can locate targets by approximation.
Simulation’s parameters and values:
The simulations is done in lower sampling frequency, for fast results.
Here are the aspects of the simulations:
h = 300 m , plane altitude
Squint angle from 0 degree to 5 degree
v = 50 m/s, speed of the plane
fs = 2 Msps , sampling frequency after de-chirping
xc = 357 m, angular center of image
PRF = 1000 Hz
Pulse Duration = 1 ms
Carrier frequency = 9.6 GHz
Chirp Bandwidth = 200 MHz
Xnear and Xfar are 252 and 519 meters respectively.
Rnear and Rfar are 391 and 600 meters respectively.
Azimuth and range resolutions are 0.2 and 0.75 meters respectively.
The signals are generated in Matlab and C, for time saving.
Test Conditions:
The test condition change by:
Number of targets
Position of targets
Squint angle
Test conditions :
1.One-Target in Middle of image, Squint angle = 0 degree
•Two-Target in Xnear and Xfar, Squint angle = 0 degree
• one-Target in Corner, Squint angle change from 4.5 to 7.5 degree
• Four Targets in corners, (Xnear, Xfar, strip’s width= 10m)
• Multi-Target, Squint angle = 0 degree
• Multi-Target, Squint angle = 5.3 degree
Test Conditions 1:
Target’s location is [Xc,0],
Squint angle = 0
PSLR = -13.41 dB
Distance from 1th-peak to 2th-peak in
azimuth direction is about 4 pixel.
Range distinction ability is 1 pixel.
Drop in range direction is about 56 dB 460 480 500 520 540
-10
0
10
20 X: 501
Y: 19.33
DetectioninAzimuth-Direction
SignalStrength[dB]
X: 497
Y: 5.917
X: 505
Y: 5.917
0 500 1000 1500 2000
-100
-50
0
50
DetectioninRange-Direction
SignalStrength[dB]
995 1000 1005 1010
-40
-20
0
20
Test Conditions 1:
Target’s location is [Xc,0]
OutputImage
500 1000 1500 2000
200
400
600
800
1000
500 1000 1500
300
400
500
600
700
800 900 1000 1100 1200
400
450
500
550
600
900 950 1000 1050 1100
450
500
550
940 960 980 1000 1020 1040 1060
480
490
500
510
520
980 990 1000 1010 1020
496
498
500
502
504
506
Test Conditions 1:
Target’s detection amplitude Target’s detection amplitude [dB]
Test Conditions 2:
Two target at [Xnear,0] , [Xfar,0]
Plane’s Height = 300 m
Xnear and Xfar (from 40 to 60 degree from Nadir line to Target) equals 252 and 519
meters respectively, so, Rnear and Rfar equals 391 and 600 meters.
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
DetectioninRange-Direction
SignalStrength[dB]
900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200
-20
0
20
X: 1179
Y: 16.85
SignalStrength[dB]
X: 901
Y: 19.81
DetectioninRange-Direction
As show in range detection image, the peaks happened at range indexes 901, 1179.
The Range Resolution equals 0.75 meter, and Rc is 466 meter, so, the differences is
-75 and 133 for Rnear and Rfar. (75/0.75 = 100, 133/0.75 = 177)
Test Conditions 2:
Two target at [Xnear,0] , [Xfar,0].
Azimuth detection:
0 200 400 600 800 1000
-60
-40
-20
0
20
DetectioninAzimuth-Direction
SignalStrength[dB]
450 500 550
-10
0
10
20
DetectioninAzimuth-Direction
SignalStrength[dB]
480 490 500 510 520 530
-20
-10
0
10
20
DetectioninAzimuth-Direction
PSLR = -14.9 dB
The second peak happened at 4th
pixel away
the center.
Test Conditions 2:
Two target at [Xnear,0] , [Xfar,0].
Output image is reconstructed as
below :
500 1000 1500 2000
200
400
600
800
1000
895 900 905
490
500
510
1160 1165 1170 1175 1180 1185 1190 1195
490
500
510
850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200
450
500
550
Test Conditions 3 (squint = 4.5):
One target at [Xc,0] , squint angle equals to 4.5 degree. Range’s resolution is 1 pixel,
in azimuth direction PSLR=-13.85dB.
920 940 960 980 1000 1020 1040 1060
-20
-10
0
10
20
DetectioninAzimuth-Direction(squint=4.5degree)
SignalStrength[dB]
0 500 1000 1500 2000
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
DetectioninRange-Direction(squint=4.5degree)
SignalStrength[dB]
OutputImage
500 1000 1500 2000
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
980 990 1000 1010 1020
980
1000
1020
1040
OutputImage
995 1000 1005 1010
1150
1200
1250
Test Conditions 3 (squint = 7.5):
One target at [Xc,0] , squint angle equals to 7.5 degree (half of the data is valid).
Range’s resolution is 1 pixel, in azimuth direction PSLR=-12.78dB (in 9 pixel).
1190 1200 1210 1220 1230 1240
-30
-20
-10
0
10
DetectioninAzimuth-Direction(squint=7.5degree)
0 500 1000 1500 2000
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
DetectioninRange-Direction(squint=7.5degree)
SignalStrength[dB]
1000.5 1001 1001.5
1205
1210
1215
1220
OutputImage
500 1000 1500 2000
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Test Conditions 3 (squint = 5.3):
One target at [Xnear,0] , squint angle equals to 5.3 degree. Range’s resolution is 1
pixel, in azimuth direction PSLR=-13.84dB. Maximum acceptable squint is 5.3 degree.
870 880 890 900 910 920 930 940
980
990
1000
1010
1020
0 500 1000 1500 2000
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
DetectioninRange-Direction(squint=5.3degree)
SignalStrength[dB]
950 1000 1050 1100
-20
-10
0
10
DetectioninAzimuth-Direction(squint=5.3degree)
SignalStrength[dB]
Test Conditions 4:
Four-Target in corners, (Xnear, Xfar, strip’s width=10m)
The peaks happened at 900 and
1179 in range, 401 and 601 in
azimuth direction.
Rnear = 391 m
Rfar = 600 m
Rc = 466 m
Range’s resolution = 0.75 m
(466 - 391)/0.75 = 100
(600-466)/0.75 = 177
Image boundary is detected.
0 500 1000 1500 2000
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
DetectioninRange-Direction
SignalStrength[dB]
0 500 1000 1500
-40
-20
0
20
DetectioninAzimuth-Direction
SignalStrength[dB]
Test Conditions 4:
Four Targets in corners, (Xnear, Xfar, strip’s width=10m)
(Image’s corners detection)
OutputImage
900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150
400
450
500
550
600
Test Conditions 5:
Multi-Target, squint angle = 0 degree
White pixels of the image separated by 1 black pixel in azimuth and 2 black pixel
in range direction. The white pixels have values.
Each pixel width equals 1
meter.
Image size is 8 * 28 meters,
Image starts from Xc to Xc+28
Range Direction
OutputImage
1155 1160 1165 1170 1175 1180 1185 1190
550
600
650
Test Conditions 5:
Multi-Target, squint angle = 0 degree
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
-40
-20
0
20 DetectioninAzimuth-Direction
SignalStrength[dB]
1155 1160 1165 1170 1175 1180 1185
5
10
15
20
DetectioninRange-Direction
SignalStrength[dB]
500 550 600 650
0
10
20
DetectioninAzimuth-Direction
SignalStrength[dB]
Test Conditions 5 (complex image):
Multi-Target, squint angle=0 degree, strip’s width=60 meters, strip’s length= 267 meters
Range Direction
OutputImage
900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200
200
400
600
800
1000
Thanks for Attention

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

PROJECT REPORT1 (1) new
PROJECT REPORT1 (1) newPROJECT REPORT1 (1) new
PROJECT REPORT1 (1) new
Ankita Badal
 
3. the-wireless-channel-2
3. the-wireless-channel-23. the-wireless-channel-2
3. the-wireless-channel-2
Naga Sirisha
 
Radar rangeequation(2)2011
Radar rangeequation(2)2011Radar rangeequation(2)2011
Radar rangeequation(2)2011
modddar
 
Suppression of Chirp Interferers in GPS Using the Fractional Fourier Transform
Suppression of Chirp Interferers in GPS Using the Fractional Fourier TransformSuppression of Chirp Interferers in GPS Using the Fractional Fourier Transform
Suppression of Chirp Interferers in GPS Using the Fractional Fourier Transform
CSCJournals
 

Mais procurados (20)

The active remote sensing equation
The active remote sensing equationThe active remote sensing equation
The active remote sensing equation
 
Moving target indicator radar (mti)part2
Moving target indicator radar (mti)part2Moving target indicator radar (mti)part2
Moving target indicator radar (mti)part2
 
Fundamentals of Passive and Active Sonar Technical Training Short Course Sampler
Fundamentals of Passive and Active Sonar Technical Training Short Course SamplerFundamentals of Passive and Active Sonar Technical Training Short Course Sampler
Fundamentals of Passive and Active Sonar Technical Training Short Course Sampler
 
A Tutorial on Radar System Engineering
A Tutorial on Radar System EngineeringA Tutorial on Radar System Engineering
A Tutorial on Radar System Engineering
 
Characterization of the Wireless Channel
Characterization of the Wireless ChannelCharacterization of the Wireless Channel
Characterization of the Wireless Channel
 
Principle of FMCW radar
Principle of FMCW radarPrinciple of FMCW radar
Principle of FMCW radar
 
PROJECT REPORT1 (1) new
PROJECT REPORT1 (1) newPROJECT REPORT1 (1) new
PROJECT REPORT1 (1) new
 
A New Underwater Acoustic Navigation Method Based on the Doppler Principle
A New Underwater Acoustic Navigation Method Based on the Doppler PrincipleA New Underwater Acoustic Navigation Method Based on the Doppler Principle
A New Underwater Acoustic Navigation Method Based on the Doppler Principle
 
Chapter 2-radar equation
Chapter 2-radar equationChapter 2-radar equation
Chapter 2-radar equation
 
3. the-wireless-channel-2
3. the-wireless-channel-23. the-wireless-channel-2
3. the-wireless-channel-2
 
radar-ppt
radar-pptradar-ppt
radar-ppt
 
Advances in polarimetric X-band weather radar
Advances in polarimetric X-band weather radarAdvances in polarimetric X-band weather radar
Advances in polarimetric X-band weather radar
 
Radar rangeequation(2)2011
Radar rangeequation(2)2011Radar rangeequation(2)2011
Radar rangeequation(2)2011
 
AESA Airborne Radar Theory and Operations Technical Training Course Sampler
AESA Airborne Radar Theory and Operations Technical Training Course SamplerAESA Airborne Radar Theory and Operations Technical Training Course Sampler
AESA Airborne Radar Theory and Operations Technical Training Course Sampler
 
Suppression of Chirp Interferers in GPS Using the Fractional Fourier Transform
Suppression of Chirp Interferers in GPS Using the Fractional Fourier TransformSuppression of Chirp Interferers in GPS Using the Fractional Fourier Transform
Suppression of Chirp Interferers in GPS Using the Fractional Fourier Transform
 
Digital processing of today’s radar signals
Digital processing of today’s radar signalsDigital processing of today’s radar signals
Digital processing of today’s radar signals
 
Dr. Wiley - PRI Analysis and Deinterleaving
Dr. Wiley - PRI Analysis and DeinterleavingDr. Wiley - PRI Analysis and Deinterleaving
Dr. Wiley - PRI Analysis and Deinterleaving
 
wireless communications
wireless communications wireless communications
wireless communications
 
10 range and doppler measurements in radar systems
10 range and doppler measurements in radar systems10 range and doppler measurements in radar systems
10 range and doppler measurements in radar systems
 
Radar ppt
Radar pptRadar ppt
Radar ppt
 

Destaque

Current & Future Spaceborne Sar Systems
Current & Future Spaceborne Sar SystemsCurrent & Future Spaceborne Sar Systems
Current & Future Spaceborne Sar Systems
gpetrie
 
Nonlinear Range Cell Migration (RCM) Compensation Method for SpaceborneAirbor...
Nonlinear Range Cell Migration (RCM) Compensation Method for SpaceborneAirbor...Nonlinear Range Cell Migration (RCM) Compensation Method for SpaceborneAirbor...
Nonlinear Range Cell Migration (RCM) Compensation Method for SpaceborneAirbor...
grssieee
 
FR3T10-3-IGARSS2011_Geolocation_20110720.pptx
FR3T10-3-IGARSS2011_Geolocation_20110720.pptxFR3T10-3-IGARSS2011_Geolocation_20110720.pptx
FR3T10-3-IGARSS2011_Geolocation_20110720.pptx
grssieee
 
Nonlinear Range Cell Migration (RCM) Compensation Method for SpaceborneAirbor...
Nonlinear Range Cell Migration (RCM) Compensation Method for SpaceborneAirbor...Nonlinear Range Cell Migration (RCM) Compensation Method for SpaceborneAirbor...
Nonlinear Range Cell Migration (RCM) Compensation Method for SpaceborneAirbor...
grssieee
 
Liwenchao.ppt
Liwenchao.pptLiwenchao.ppt
Liwenchao.ppt
grssieee
 
DPCA_SAR Imaging Based on CS.ppt
DPCA_SAR Imaging Based on CS.pptDPCA_SAR Imaging Based on CS.ppt
DPCA_SAR Imaging Based on CS.ppt
grssieee
 
4_IGARSS11_younis_NoGIFv4.pptx
4_IGARSS11_younis_NoGIFv4.pptx4_IGARSS11_younis_NoGIFv4.pptx
4_IGARSS11_younis_NoGIFv4.pptx
grssieee
 
IGARSS11_FFBP_CSAR_v3.ppt
IGARSS11_FFBP_CSAR_v3.pptIGARSS11_FFBP_CSAR_v3.ppt
IGARSS11_FFBP_CSAR_v3.ppt
grssieee
 
MO3.L09.2 - BISTATIC SAR BASED ON TERRASAR-X AND GROUND BASED RECEIVERS
MO3.L09.2 - BISTATIC SAR BASED ON TERRASAR-X AND GROUND BASED RECEIVERSMO3.L09.2 - BISTATIC SAR BASED ON TERRASAR-X AND GROUND BASED RECEIVERS
MO3.L09.2 - BISTATIC SAR BASED ON TERRASAR-X AND GROUND BASED RECEIVERS
grssieee
 
WE3.L10.3: THE FUTURE OF SPACEBORNE SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR
WE3.L10.3: THE FUTURE OF SPACEBORNE SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADARWE3.L10.3: THE FUTURE OF SPACEBORNE SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR
WE3.L10.3: THE FUTURE OF SPACEBORNE SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR
grssieee
 
2-Bordoni_IGARSS11_APC.ppt
2-Bordoni_IGARSS11_APC.ppt2-Bordoni_IGARSS11_APC.ppt
2-Bordoni_IGARSS11_APC.ppt
grssieee
 
Synthetic aperture radar_advanced
Synthetic aperture radar_advancedSynthetic aperture radar_advanced
Synthetic aperture radar_advanced
Naivedya Mishra
 

Destaque (19)

Current & Future Spaceborne Sar Systems
Current & Future Spaceborne Sar SystemsCurrent & Future Spaceborne Sar Systems
Current & Future Spaceborne Sar Systems
 
Design and implementation of GPU-based SAR image processor
Design and implementation of GPU-based SAR image processorDesign and implementation of GPU-based SAR image processor
Design and implementation of GPU-based SAR image processor
 
Radar 2009 a 14 airborne pulse doppler radar
Radar 2009 a 14 airborne pulse doppler radarRadar 2009 a 14 airborne pulse doppler radar
Radar 2009 a 14 airborne pulse doppler radar
 
Nonlinear Range Cell Migration (RCM) Compensation Method for SpaceborneAirbor...
Nonlinear Range Cell Migration (RCM) Compensation Method for SpaceborneAirbor...Nonlinear Range Cell Migration (RCM) Compensation Method for SpaceborneAirbor...
Nonlinear Range Cell Migration (RCM) Compensation Method for SpaceborneAirbor...
 
FR3T10-3-IGARSS2011_Geolocation_20110720.pptx
FR3T10-3-IGARSS2011_Geolocation_20110720.pptxFR3T10-3-IGARSS2011_Geolocation_20110720.pptx
FR3T10-3-IGARSS2011_Geolocation_20110720.pptx
 
Nonlinear Range Cell Migration (RCM) Compensation Method for SpaceborneAirbor...
Nonlinear Range Cell Migration (RCM) Compensation Method for SpaceborneAirbor...Nonlinear Range Cell Migration (RCM) Compensation Method for SpaceborneAirbor...
Nonlinear Range Cell Migration (RCM) Compensation Method for SpaceborneAirbor...
 
Liwenchao.ppt
Liwenchao.pptLiwenchao.ppt
Liwenchao.ppt
 
DPCA_SAR Imaging Based on CS.ppt
DPCA_SAR Imaging Based on CS.pptDPCA_SAR Imaging Based on CS.ppt
DPCA_SAR Imaging Based on CS.ppt
 
4_IGARSS11_younis_NoGIFv4.pptx
4_IGARSS11_younis_NoGIFv4.pptx4_IGARSS11_younis_NoGIFv4.pptx
4_IGARSS11_younis_NoGIFv4.pptx
 
IGARSS11_FFBP_CSAR_v3.ppt
IGARSS11_FFBP_CSAR_v3.pptIGARSS11_FFBP_CSAR_v3.ppt
IGARSS11_FFBP_CSAR_v3.ppt
 
Radar
RadarRadar
Radar
 
MO3.L09.2 - BISTATIC SAR BASED ON TERRASAR-X AND GROUND BASED RECEIVERS
MO3.L09.2 - BISTATIC SAR BASED ON TERRASAR-X AND GROUND BASED RECEIVERSMO3.L09.2 - BISTATIC SAR BASED ON TERRASAR-X AND GROUND BASED RECEIVERS
MO3.L09.2 - BISTATIC SAR BASED ON TERRASAR-X AND GROUND BASED RECEIVERS
 
WE3.L10.3: THE FUTURE OF SPACEBORNE SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR
WE3.L10.3: THE FUTURE OF SPACEBORNE SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADARWE3.L10.3: THE FUTURE OF SPACEBORNE SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR
WE3.L10.3: THE FUTURE OF SPACEBORNE SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR
 
2-Bordoni_IGARSS11_APC.ppt
2-Bordoni_IGARSS11_APC.ppt2-Bordoni_IGARSS11_APC.ppt
2-Bordoni_IGARSS11_APC.ppt
 
Radar 2009 a 16 parameter estimation and tracking part2
Radar 2009 a 16 parameter estimation and tracking part2Radar 2009 a 16 parameter estimation and tracking part2
Radar 2009 a 16 parameter estimation and tracking part2
 
Airbone Radar Applications by Wg Cdr Anupam Tiwari
Airbone Radar Applications by Wg Cdr Anupam TiwariAirbone Radar Applications by Wg Cdr Anupam Tiwari
Airbone Radar Applications by Wg Cdr Anupam Tiwari
 
Synthetic aperture radar_advanced
Synthetic aperture radar_advancedSynthetic aperture radar_advanced
Synthetic aperture radar_advanced
 
Airborne radar
Airborne  radarAirborne  radar
Airborne radar
 
Military Radar
Military RadarMilitary Radar
Military Radar
 

Semelhante a PresentationSAR

1-Wang-FR1020-IGARSS11.pptx
1-Wang-FR1020-IGARSS11.pptx1-Wang-FR1020-IGARSS11.pptx
1-Wang-FR1020-IGARSS11.pptx
grssieee
 
MO4.L09 - POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF FORWARD-LOOKING BISTATIC SAR
MO4.L09 - POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF FORWARD-LOOKING BISTATIC SARMO4.L09 - POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF FORWARD-LOOKING BISTATIC SAR
MO4.L09 - POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF FORWARD-LOOKING BISTATIC SAR
grssieee
 
TH1.L10.3: MONOSTATIC CALIBRATION OF BOTH TANDEM-X SATELLITES
TH1.L10.3: MONOSTATIC CALIBRATION OF BOTH TANDEM-X SATELLITESTH1.L10.3: MONOSTATIC CALIBRATION OF BOTH TANDEM-X SATELLITES
TH1.L10.3: MONOSTATIC CALIBRATION OF BOTH TANDEM-X SATELLITES
grssieee
 
chandra shekhar_Unit 2 _Radar_ feb 4 2016
chandra shekhar_Unit 2 _Radar_ feb 4 2016chandra shekhar_Unit 2 _Radar_ feb 4 2016
chandra shekhar_Unit 2 _Radar_ feb 4 2016
CHANDRA SHEKHAR
 
Introduction-to-Radar-Lecture-1-Material.pdf
Introduction-to-Radar-Lecture-1-Material.pdfIntroduction-to-Radar-Lecture-1-Material.pdf
Introduction-to-Radar-Lecture-1-Material.pdf
amitkumar473416
 
IGARSS_2011_XB_v007.pptx
IGARSS_2011_XB_v007.pptxIGARSS_2011_XB_v007.pptx
IGARSS_2011_XB_v007.pptx
grssieee
 
IGARSS_2011_XB_v007.pptx
IGARSS_2011_XB_v007.pptxIGARSS_2011_XB_v007.pptx
IGARSS_2011_XB_v007.pptx
grssieee
 

Semelhante a PresentationSAR (20)

RADAR MEASUREMENTS LECTURE EECS BERKELY!
RADAR MEASUREMENTS LECTURE EECS BERKELY!RADAR MEASUREMENTS LECTURE EECS BERKELY!
RADAR MEASUREMENTS LECTURE EECS BERKELY!
 
Doppler radar
Doppler radarDoppler radar
Doppler radar
 
6Aesa7.ppt
6Aesa7.ppt6Aesa7.ppt
6Aesa7.ppt
 
IARE_RS_PPT_0.pdf
IARE_RS_PPT_0.pdfIARE_RS_PPT_0.pdf
IARE_RS_PPT_0.pdf
 
Xray interferometry
Xray interferometryXray interferometry
Xray interferometry
 
1-Wang-FR1020-IGARSS11.pptx
1-Wang-FR1020-IGARSS11.pptx1-Wang-FR1020-IGARSS11.pptx
1-Wang-FR1020-IGARSS11.pptx
 
Report Radar and Remote Sensing
Report Radar and Remote SensingReport Radar and Remote Sensing
Report Radar and Remote Sensing
 
MO4.L09 - POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF FORWARD-LOOKING BISTATIC SAR
MO4.L09 - POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF FORWARD-LOOKING BISTATIC SARMO4.L09 - POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF FORWARD-LOOKING BISTATIC SAR
MO4.L09 - POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF FORWARD-LOOKING BISTATIC SAR
 
wirelessSlidesCh04 (2).ppt
wirelessSlidesCh04 (2).pptwirelessSlidesCh04 (2).ppt
wirelessSlidesCh04 (2).ppt
 
asil-14
asil-14asil-14
asil-14
 
Senior design final presentation master
Senior design final presentation masterSenior design final presentation master
Senior design final presentation master
 
ofdma doppler
ofdma dopplerofdma doppler
ofdma doppler
 
microwave-communication-wave-guides
microwave-communication-wave-guidesmicrowave-communication-wave-guides
microwave-communication-wave-guides
 
TH1.L10.3: MONOSTATIC CALIBRATION OF BOTH TANDEM-X SATELLITES
TH1.L10.3: MONOSTATIC CALIBRATION OF BOTH TANDEM-X SATELLITESTH1.L10.3: MONOSTATIC CALIBRATION OF BOTH TANDEM-X SATELLITES
TH1.L10.3: MONOSTATIC CALIBRATION OF BOTH TANDEM-X SATELLITES
 
Belmonte
BelmonteBelmonte
Belmonte
 
chandra shekhar_Unit 2 _Radar_ feb 4 2016
chandra shekhar_Unit 2 _Radar_ feb 4 2016chandra shekhar_Unit 2 _Radar_ feb 4 2016
chandra shekhar_Unit 2 _Radar_ feb 4 2016
 
Principles of MRI Physics and Engineering.ppt
Principles of MRI Physics and Engineering.pptPrinciples of MRI Physics and Engineering.ppt
Principles of MRI Physics and Engineering.ppt
 
Introduction-to-Radar-Lecture-1-Material.pdf
Introduction-to-Radar-Lecture-1-Material.pdfIntroduction-to-Radar-Lecture-1-Material.pdf
Introduction-to-Radar-Lecture-1-Material.pdf
 
IGARSS_2011_XB_v007.pptx
IGARSS_2011_XB_v007.pptxIGARSS_2011_XB_v007.pptx
IGARSS_2011_XB_v007.pptx
 
IGARSS_2011_XB_v007.pptx
IGARSS_2011_XB_v007.pptxIGARSS_2011_XB_v007.pptx
IGARSS_2011_XB_v007.pptx
 

PresentationSAR

  • 1. Signal Processing of SAR Detection Algorithm
  • 2. SAR Signal Specifications: The LFM signal equation has same form in spatial and frequency domain. Range frequency in LFM has direct relation with range frequency: f  Kr . t If t change from 0 to T, f change from 0 to BW. f = BW f = 0 Hz t = Tt = 0
  • 3. SAR Signals: Strip-map mode Moving direction (Nadir line) Delay time in receive signal The plane in moving during send and receive. Doppler effect and plane’s moving makes SAR system complex. Range Cell Migration is to find exact place of the surface where the receive signal hit it and reflect.
  • 4. SAR Signals and RCM: Complexity hierarchical 1. Line beam, no movement 2. Line beam, with movement 3. Antenna beam, no movement (-) 4. Antenna beam, with movement(+) (-): Pulse-signal SAR (Doppler effect) stop-and-go situation (+): LFM-CW SAR
  • 5. SAR Processing Algorithms Range Doppler Algorithm Chirp Scaling Algorithm Omega-K Algorithm
  • 6. SAR Processing Algorithm Send and Received Signals: Signal Bandwidth is defined by pulse duration and Kr parameter. The echo signal multiply by reference signal and digitized by ADC. * Redc Transmit ceiveS S S= × rBandWidth K T τ = ×
  • 7. De-chirp Signal Bandwidth: Frequency Domain: Bandwidth shift by center of image, using Lowpass filter Range bandwidth: Plane height = 1000 m Plane speed = 50 m/s Plane angle = 50 degree Squint angle = 0 Range variations from 1300 to 2000 meter De-chirp Signal Bandwidth is determined by SAR range of detection. The echo signal multiply by reference signal and digitized by ADC. 2 0 0 0 0 0( , , , ) ( , ) exp( 2 )dc r rS t r s r s j f j K j K tτ σ π τ π τ π τ= × ∆ − ∆ + ∆ 2 0 0 0( ) ( , ) exp( 2 ) exp( 2 )dc r rF S r s j f j K j K t j ft dtσ π τ π τ π τ π= × ∆ − ∆ + ∆ × −∫
  • 8. De-chirp Signal Bandwidth: Range frequency: Bandwidth = 1 MHz Range variations from 1300 to 2000 meter Delay is dictated by slant range: Range frequency spectrum:
  • 9. Stationary-Phase Principle: POSP is used to approximate Fourier transform in Azimuth direction.
  • 10. Stationary-Phase Principle: Phase-Stationary to get a mathematical view to Fourier transform of De-chirp signal For example: 2 0 0 0( , ) exp( 2 2 ) exp( 2 ).dc r r sSf r s j f j K j K t j f t dtσ π τ π τ π τ π= × ∆ − ∆ + ∆ × −∫ 2 02 2 2fourier r r s sf K K t f tθ π τ π τ π τ π= ∆ − ∆ + ∆ − 2 2 2 022 sr v tR c c τ + = = ' 0 d dt θ θ = = Phase-Stationary is a place where amplitude variation is ignorable against phase variation. 2 0 0 0 0 0( , , , ) ( , ) exp( 2 )dc r rS t r s r s j f j K j K tτ σ π τ π τ π τ= × ∆ − ∆ + ∆
  • 11. Taylor approximation used to linear azimuth and range in formula Taylor approximations: Taylor approximations can be used
  • 12. Taylor approximations: Considering phase of Fourier transform, it composed of three nonlinearity need to be solved before proceeding. The first term is modulation of azimuth , the second is RCM which is linear to range frequency, and the last is secondary range compression. Each part must be compensated to derive a phase in two in-depended dimension. These nonlinearities and dependencies can be solved in frequency domain or by changing the variables and domains. The second is defined as w-k algorithm. In this method the range and azimuth frequency domain change to w-k domain which in the new domain the domains are orthogonal too. In w-k algorithm the Reference Function Multiply is used for decoupling, and created in w-k domain.
  • 13. Reference Function Multiply Reference function multiply In w-k algorithm Rc is the slant range from plane to center of the target scene Rc is the center of Bandwidth in range’s Fourier transform Reference function multiply change the phase of signal by distance from Rc
  • 14. Focusing in LFM-CW Omega-K : Returning from w-k domain by inverse Fourier transform: The position of the target appear as a spike function (Delta) in range-azimuth domain. The Phase Stationary algorithm can locate targets by approximation.
  • 15. Simulation’s parameters and values: The simulations is done in lower sampling frequency, for fast results. Here are the aspects of the simulations: h = 300 m , plane altitude Squint angle from 0 degree to 5 degree v = 50 m/s, speed of the plane fs = 2 Msps , sampling frequency after de-chirping xc = 357 m, angular center of image PRF = 1000 Hz Pulse Duration = 1 ms Carrier frequency = 9.6 GHz Chirp Bandwidth = 200 MHz Xnear and Xfar are 252 and 519 meters respectively. Rnear and Rfar are 391 and 600 meters respectively. Azimuth and range resolutions are 0.2 and 0.75 meters respectively. The signals are generated in Matlab and C, for time saving.
  • 16. Test Conditions: The test condition change by: Number of targets Position of targets Squint angle Test conditions : 1.One-Target in Middle of image, Squint angle = 0 degree •Two-Target in Xnear and Xfar, Squint angle = 0 degree • one-Target in Corner, Squint angle change from 4.5 to 7.5 degree • Four Targets in corners, (Xnear, Xfar, strip’s width= 10m) • Multi-Target, Squint angle = 0 degree • Multi-Target, Squint angle = 5.3 degree
  • 17. Test Conditions 1: Target’s location is [Xc,0], Squint angle = 0 PSLR = -13.41 dB Distance from 1th-peak to 2th-peak in azimuth direction is about 4 pixel. Range distinction ability is 1 pixel. Drop in range direction is about 56 dB 460 480 500 520 540 -10 0 10 20 X: 501 Y: 19.33 DetectioninAzimuth-Direction SignalStrength[dB] X: 497 Y: 5.917 X: 505 Y: 5.917 0 500 1000 1500 2000 -100 -50 0 50 DetectioninRange-Direction SignalStrength[dB] 995 1000 1005 1010 -40 -20 0 20
  • 18. Test Conditions 1: Target’s location is [Xc,0] OutputImage 500 1000 1500 2000 200 400 600 800 1000 500 1000 1500 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 400 450 500 550 600 900 950 1000 1050 1100 450 500 550 940 960 980 1000 1020 1040 1060 480 490 500 510 520 980 990 1000 1010 1020 496 498 500 502 504 506
  • 19. Test Conditions 1: Target’s detection amplitude Target’s detection amplitude [dB]
  • 20. Test Conditions 2: Two target at [Xnear,0] , [Xfar,0] Plane’s Height = 300 m Xnear and Xfar (from 40 to 60 degree from Nadir line to Target) equals 252 and 519 meters respectively, so, Rnear and Rfar equals 391 and 600 meters. 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 DetectioninRange-Direction SignalStrength[dB] 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 -20 0 20 X: 1179 Y: 16.85 SignalStrength[dB] X: 901 Y: 19.81 DetectioninRange-Direction As show in range detection image, the peaks happened at range indexes 901, 1179. The Range Resolution equals 0.75 meter, and Rc is 466 meter, so, the differences is -75 and 133 for Rnear and Rfar. (75/0.75 = 100, 133/0.75 = 177)
  • 21. Test Conditions 2: Two target at [Xnear,0] , [Xfar,0]. Azimuth detection: 0 200 400 600 800 1000 -60 -40 -20 0 20 DetectioninAzimuth-Direction SignalStrength[dB] 450 500 550 -10 0 10 20 DetectioninAzimuth-Direction SignalStrength[dB] 480 490 500 510 520 530 -20 -10 0 10 20 DetectioninAzimuth-Direction PSLR = -14.9 dB The second peak happened at 4th pixel away the center.
  • 22. Test Conditions 2: Two target at [Xnear,0] , [Xfar,0]. Output image is reconstructed as below : 500 1000 1500 2000 200 400 600 800 1000 895 900 905 490 500 510 1160 1165 1170 1175 1180 1185 1190 1195 490 500 510 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 450 500 550
  • 23. Test Conditions 3 (squint = 4.5): One target at [Xc,0] , squint angle equals to 4.5 degree. Range’s resolution is 1 pixel, in azimuth direction PSLR=-13.85dB. 920 940 960 980 1000 1020 1040 1060 -20 -10 0 10 20 DetectioninAzimuth-Direction(squint=4.5degree) SignalStrength[dB] 0 500 1000 1500 2000 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 DetectioninRange-Direction(squint=4.5degree) SignalStrength[dB] OutputImage 500 1000 1500 2000 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 980 990 1000 1010 1020 980 1000 1020 1040
  • 24. OutputImage 995 1000 1005 1010 1150 1200 1250 Test Conditions 3 (squint = 7.5): One target at [Xc,0] , squint angle equals to 7.5 degree (half of the data is valid). Range’s resolution is 1 pixel, in azimuth direction PSLR=-12.78dB (in 9 pixel). 1190 1200 1210 1220 1230 1240 -30 -20 -10 0 10 DetectioninAzimuth-Direction(squint=7.5degree) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 DetectioninRange-Direction(squint=7.5degree) SignalStrength[dB] 1000.5 1001 1001.5 1205 1210 1215 1220
  • 25. OutputImage 500 1000 1500 2000 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Test Conditions 3 (squint = 5.3): One target at [Xnear,0] , squint angle equals to 5.3 degree. Range’s resolution is 1 pixel, in azimuth direction PSLR=-13.84dB. Maximum acceptable squint is 5.3 degree. 870 880 890 900 910 920 930 940 980 990 1000 1010 1020 0 500 1000 1500 2000 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 DetectioninRange-Direction(squint=5.3degree) SignalStrength[dB] 950 1000 1050 1100 -20 -10 0 10 DetectioninAzimuth-Direction(squint=5.3degree) SignalStrength[dB]
  • 26. Test Conditions 4: Four-Target in corners, (Xnear, Xfar, strip’s width=10m) The peaks happened at 900 and 1179 in range, 401 and 601 in azimuth direction. Rnear = 391 m Rfar = 600 m Rc = 466 m Range’s resolution = 0.75 m (466 - 391)/0.75 = 100 (600-466)/0.75 = 177 Image boundary is detected. 0 500 1000 1500 2000 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 DetectioninRange-Direction SignalStrength[dB] 0 500 1000 1500 -40 -20 0 20 DetectioninAzimuth-Direction SignalStrength[dB]
  • 27. Test Conditions 4: Four Targets in corners, (Xnear, Xfar, strip’s width=10m) (Image’s corners detection) OutputImage 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 400 450 500 550 600
  • 28. Test Conditions 5: Multi-Target, squint angle = 0 degree White pixels of the image separated by 1 black pixel in azimuth and 2 black pixel in range direction. The white pixels have values. Each pixel width equals 1 meter. Image size is 8 * 28 meters, Image starts from Xc to Xc+28 Range Direction OutputImage 1155 1160 1165 1170 1175 1180 1185 1190 550 600 650
  • 29. Test Conditions 5: Multi-Target, squint angle = 0 degree 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 -40 -20 0 20 DetectioninAzimuth-Direction SignalStrength[dB] 1155 1160 1165 1170 1175 1180 1185 5 10 15 20 DetectioninRange-Direction SignalStrength[dB] 500 550 600 650 0 10 20 DetectioninAzimuth-Direction SignalStrength[dB]
  • 30. Test Conditions 5 (complex image): Multi-Target, squint angle=0 degree, strip’s width=60 meters, strip’s length= 267 meters Range Direction OutputImage 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 200 400 600 800 1000