The document discusses the morality of human sexuality. It argues that human sexuality requires commitment, care, concern and responsibility for the other person. It should not be self-centered or dehumanizing by destroying the other's dignity. Additionally, human sexuality is discussed in the context of natural law theory, Kantian ethics, Rawlsian justice as fairness, and Fletcher's views on necessity and survival.

1. Morality of Human Sexuality

2. Meaning
 Sexual meaning makes us realize the need for some
measure of fullfillment that only the other can give.
 One has to be free from self-centeredness by opening
one to the other person.
 HS
 Giving ang giving of the best, a giving of self.
 Giving until nothing more is to give

3.  A happiness that is sought for ourselves alone can
never be found. For a happiness that is diminished
by being shared is not big enough to make us happy.
 Making someone happy

4. ONE HAS THE
RIGHT OR
FREEDOM OF
SEXUALITY

5.  Your right to sex involves a duty in others to respect
it
 Sex implies moral discipline
 It is better ot be a human being dissatisfied than a pig
satisfied”
 John Stuart Miller

6. HUMAN
SEXUALITY=COMMITMENT

7. Human Sexuality
 Commitment consist of
 Care
 Concern
 Responsibility
 Safeguarding the other’s value
 Responsibility to and for one another
 Humanizing
 Human sex is dehumanizing if and when it destroys a person’s
honr, and becomes a degradation of the other

8. Moral Context
 Natural Law
 HS is sacred and a God-given Gift
 Kant
 Act as to reat human as always an end, never as means
 Rawls
 Justice is fairness.
 Never take advantege of persons for own personal gains and
satisfaction
 Fletcher
 Prostitution out of necessity and survival may be legitimate