Psychology uses the scientific method to systematically study behavior and mental processes. The scientific method involves making observations, forming testable hypotheses, collecting data to test hypotheses, and reporting findings. There are four main goals of psychology: describe, explain, predict, and change behaviors. Researchers use a variety of methods including observational, correlational, and experimental studies. Experiments are powerful because they use random assignment to establish cause-and-effect relationships between variables. Strict research protocols are followed to ensure studies are valid, reliable, and ethical.
7. BECOMING A PSYCHOLOGICAL
DETECTIVE
In evaluating causal or research
claims, we should ask the
following questions:
• What is the statement or
claim, and who is making it?
• Is the statement or claim
based on scientific
observations?
• What do statistics reveal?
• Are there plausible
alternative explanations for
the statement or claim?
8.
9.
10. PSYCHOLOGY IS SCIENCE
• explores theories,
general scientific
understanding (meets
first three goals of
psychology—describe,
explain, and predict)
Basic research—
• addresses real-world
problems (meets
fourth goal—change)
Applied research—
The scientific
method
is a system of investigation in
which a person makes careful
observations of a phenomenon,
proposes theories to explain the
phenomenon, makes
hypotheses about future
behaviors, and then tests these
hypotheses through more
research and observation.
12. RESEARCH METHODS
•Ambiguity about Causation•Establishing Cause and Effect
•Experimental Groups versus
Control Groups
•Random Assignment
•Within-Subject Comparisons
•Internal Validity
•Descriptive Statistics
•Inferential Statistics
•Defining the Question
•Systematically Collecting Data
•Defining the Sample
•Assessing External Validity
•Monitoring Demand
Characteristics
Making
Observations
Working with
Data
Observational
Studies
Experimental
Design
13. THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD
Step 1
•Forming a Testable Hypothesis
Step 2
• Devise a Study and Collect Data
Step 3
•Examine Data and Reach Conclusions
Step 4
•Report the Findings of the Study
14. MAKING OBSERVATIONS IN THE RESEARCH
PROCESS
Defining the
Question
Systematically
Collecting Data
Defining the
Sample
Assessing
External
Validity
Monitoring
Demand
Characteristics A comprehensive flow chart of the
research process
15. WHAT IS A VARIABLE?
Variable: Any characteristic whose values can change
i.e. something that can vary
16. DEFINING THE QUESTION
Observe the World!
The basis of research, is coming up with a question and making a prediction about
the answer that you can test (hypothesis)
Observe Question Predict
YOUR HYPOTHESIS IS
YOUR PREDICTION
17. HYPOTHESIS & VARIABLES
Hypothesis:
prediction about
future behaviors
that is derived
from observation
and theories.
Variable: A factor or element
that can change in observable
and measurable ways.
The hypothesis expresses a
relationship between two
variables.
YOUR HYPOTHESIS IS YOUR PREDICTION
ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP OF VARIABLES
18. FROM QUESTIONS TO TESTABLE HYPOTHESES
Testable Hypothesis
Must be falsifiable
Create operational definitions for
variables
Predicting the Answer (Defining your Hypothesis)
The hypothesis is a possible answer to your question
Defining the Research Question
What are you interested
in?
What should you
observe?
What question do you
have about your
observation?
19. OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS
Operational definition:
A definition that
translates the variable
we want to assess into a
specific procedure or
instrument
• Explain what you mean
• Put the variables in “real life”
terms
20. DEFINING YOUR VARIABLES
Independent Variable:
• The variable that the
experimenter manipulates as
a basis for making predictions
about the dependent variable
Dependent Variable:
• The variable that is measured
or recorded in an experiment
22. DEFINING THE SAMPLE
Population:
• The entire group about
which the investigator wants
to draw conclusions
Sample:
• The subset of the population
that the investigator studies
in order to learn about the
population at large
23. EXTERNAL VALIDITY
Can we generalize?
Population Validity:
Generalizability to other people
Ecological Validity:
Generalizability to other settings
24. EXTERNAL VALIDITY
External Validity
• The degree to which a study’s
participants, stimuli, and
procedures adequately reflect
the world as it actually is
26. THREAT TO CONSTRUCT:
DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS
Keep subjects blind
and experimenters so
they don’t know what
is expected from
them
27. DOUBLE BLIND STUDY
Random assignment of test subjects to the experimental and control groups is a critical
part of any double-blind research design. The key that identifies the subjects and which
group they belonged to is kept by a third party, and is not revealed to the researchers until
the study is over.
28. WORKING WITH DATA
Descriptive
Statistics
Inferential
Statistics
Descriptive Statistics:
• Mathementical procedures that
allow a researcher to characterize a
data pattern; these procedures
include measures of central
tendency and variability
Inferential statistics:
• Mathematical procedures that allow
a researcher to draw further cliams
from a data pattern, including claims
about whether the pattern observed
in the sample is likely to be observed
in other samples
29. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Experimental research
Descriptive research
• Naturalistic Observation—measure and record behavior of
participants
• Surveys—used to determine opinions, attitudes, feelings or behaviors
related to a specific issue
• Case studies—intensive study of a particular case, patient or situation
Correlational research
• Identifies relationships between variables
• Statistical analysis
• No cause and effect only relationships
Biological research
• Studies brain and nervous system
• Identifies cause, description and prediction
• Shares advantages/disadvantages of other three types
• Several methods of study (see text pp. 37-38)
30. MEASURES OF CENTRAL
TENDENCY
Mean: Average of data
Median: 50th percentile, half
above, half below
Mode: most frequently
occurring score
Usually the mean is the best
measure, but with very
extreme scores or skewed
data, the median is most
accurate
32. THE CORRELATION
COEFFICIENT
Looking at the relationship between X (predictor) and Y (criterion)
While there isn’t an IV/DV, X is often consider the X the IV and the Y
the DV
Range: -1.0 – 1.0
33. CORRELATION IS ABOUT
ASSOCIATION NOT
CAUSATION
Correlation coefficient (r):
• summarizes degree of
association between X and
Y variables
• r ranges from -1.0 to + 1.0
• Close to zero is weaker,
close to -1 or +1 is stronger
• Positive: One goes up, the
other does, Negative:
Inverse
Degree of association
between two or more
variables
X = Predictor (IV)
Y = Criterion (DV)
34. CORRELATIONS GRAPHICALLY
Closer the points to the line, the
stronger the correlation
Variability (spread) is equal on X
and Y when there is a 0
correlation.
36. OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES
Ambiguity
about
Causation
One common observational study is about the
possible effect of a treatment on subjects,
where the assignment of subjects into a
treated group versus a control group is outside
the control of the investigator.
37. ESTABLISHING CAUSE AND EFFECT: THE
POWER OF EXPERIMENTS
Experimental Groups versus Control
Groups
Random Assignment
Within-Subject Comparisons
Internal Validity
38. VARIABLES IN EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
Independent
Variable
Whatever is being
manipulated
Brings about
change
(hopefully)
Drug trials- IV is
the drug
Dependent
Variable
Whatever is being
measured
It is dependent on
the independent
variable
Drug trials- DV is
the effect of the
drug.
39. True Experimental
•IV is manipulated
•Randomly assigned
Quasi-Experimental
•IV manipulated
•NOT randomly assigned
Non-Experimental,
Observational,
Passive
TYPES OF RESEARCH
40. TRUE VERSUS QUASI
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
True experimental
• MUST BE ABLE TO RANDOMLY
ASSIGN SUBJECTS TO TREATMENT
OR NON-TREATMENT CONDITIONS
Quasi-experimental
• Cannot control random assignment
• i.e. sex offenders, addiction status
• Effects can be caused by other
confounding factors
RANDOM ASSIGNMENT DISTINGUISHES TRUE V. QUASI-
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
41. MEDIATING AND
MODERATING VARIABLES
Mediator Variable: Is responsible for the observed relationship
between IV and DV
Moderator Variable: Affects strength of relationship between IV and
DV
EXAMPLE OF MEDIATOR VARIABLE
44. INTERNAL VALIDITY
Internal Validity:
• Can we determine there is a
causal relationship between IV
and DV?
External:
• Can the relationship be
generalized?
46. EFFECT SIZE
The practical or clinical significance of
the results
Types of Effect Size:
• Cohen’s d
• Eta squared
Also used in meta-analysis. Different
studies converted to common metric so
results can be compared
47. RESEARCH ETHICS
Human participants
• Informed consent
• Deception
• Confidentiality/anonymity
• Special issues for students
Non-human participants
Ethical issues related to psychotherapy
48. INFORMED CONSENT
Informed consent:
• process for getting permission before
conducting a healthcare intervention on a
person. A health care provider may ask a
patient to consent to receive therapy
before providing it, or a clinical researcher
may ask a research participant before
enrolling that person into a clinical trial.
50. KEY TERMS
Making
Observations
Variables
Testable Hypothesis
Operational Definition
Dependent Variable
Independent Variable
Population
Sample
Random Sampling
Case Study
External Validity
Demand Characteristics
Double-Blind Design
Working with
Data
Descriptive Statistics
Inferential Statistics
Mean, Median & Mode
Variability
Standard Deviation
Correlation
Correlation Coefficient
Reliability
Validity
Effect Size
Statistical Significance
Observational
Studies
Quasi-experiment
Correlational Studies
Third-Variable Problem
Establishing
Cause and
Effect: The
Power of
Experiments
Experiment
Experimental Manipulation
Experimental Group
Control Group
Random Assignment
Within-Subject
Comparisons
Between-Subject
Comparisons
Replication
Meta-Analysis
Research Ethics
Informed Consent
Debriefing
Empirical Claims
Notas do Editor
Psychologists use the scientific method to conduct their research. The scientific method is a standardized way of making observations, gathering data, forming theories, testing predictions, and interpreting results.
Researchers make observations in order to describe and measure behavior. After observing certain events repeatedly, researchers come up with a theory that explains these observations. A theory is an explanation that organizes separate pieces of information in a coherent way. Researchers generally develop a theory only after they have collected a lot of evidence and made sure their research results can be reproduced by others.
Key Info
The scientific method is a way to ask and answer scientific questions by making observations and doing experiments.
The steps of the scientific method are to:
Ask a Question
Do Background Research
Construct a Hypothesis
Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment
Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion
Communicate Your Results
It is important for your experiment to be a fair test. A "fair test" occurs when you change only one factor (variable) and keep all other conditions the same.
Tips for Writing Research Questions
Be as specific as possible.
In some cases, you may make two or more research questions to cover a complex topic.
Be flexible.
For example, if you are studying the effects of sleep on reflexes, you might formulate the following research question: What are the effects of sleep on reflexes? A similar question might be: Does sleep have an effect on reflexes? OR Is maximum reflex efficiency achieved after eight hours of sleep?
Remember: The goal of your research is to find the answer to the research question. Make sure that the question reflects your goals in its words and phrasing.
Use this tutorial if you are writing research questions for a qualitative design.
Tips for Writing Hypotheses
When you state your hypotheses, be sure that the content of the hypothesis matches the experimental procedure. What you write should be the best estimation of the outcome of the lab procedure. Along with the hypothesis, you should write several sentences which explain the scientific reasoning that led you to that hypothesis.
2. Theory
3. How might you test it?
Any other questions anyone wants to add? And anyone else want to form a hypothesis?
Psychologists and other social scientists regularly propose explanations for human behavior. On a more informal level, people make judgments about the intentions, motivations and actions of others on a daily basis. While the everyday judgments we make about human behavior are subjective and anecdotal, researchers use the scientific method to study psychology in an objective and systematic way. The results of these studies are often reported in popular media, which leads many to wonder just how or why researchers arrived at the conclusions they did.
In order to truly understand how psychologists and other researchers reach these conclusions, you need to know more about the research process that is used to study psychology and the basic steps that are utilized when conducting any type of psychological research. By knowing the steps of the scientific method, you can better understand the process researchers go through to arrive at conclusions about human behavior.
The study of psychology has five basic goals:
1. Describe –
The first goal is to observe behavior and describe, often in minute detail, what was observed as objectively as possible
2. Explain –
While descriptions come from observable data, psychologists must go beyond what is obvious and explain their observations. In other words, why did the subject do what he or she did?
3. Predict –
Once we know what happens, and why it happens, we can begin to speculate what will happen in the future. There’s an old saying, which very often holds true: “the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior.”
4. Control –
Once we know what happens, why it happens and what is likely to happen in the future, we can excerpt control over it. In other words, if we know you choose abusive partners because your father was abusive, we can assume you will choose another abusive partner, and can therefore intervene to change this negative behavior.
5. Improve –
Not only do psychologists attempt to control behavior, they want to do so in a positive manner, they want to improve a person’s life, not make it worse. This is not always the case, but it should always be the intention.
Chapter Summary:
Making Observations
Defining the Question
Systematically Collecting Data
Defining the Sample
Assessing External Validity
Monitoring Demand Characteristics
Working with Data
Descriptive Statistics
Inferential Statistics
Observational Studies
Ambiguity about Causation
Establishing Cause and Effect: The Power of Experiments
Experimental Groups versus Control Groups
Random Assignment
Within-Subject Comparisons
Internal Validity
Beyond the Single Experiment
Research Ethics
The Power of Science
Some Final Thoughts: Methodological Eclecticism
Summary
Key Terms to Know
Hypothesis: An educated guess about the possible relationship between two or more variables.
Variable: A factor or element that can change in observable and measurable ways.
Operational Definition: A full description of exactly how variables are defined, how they will be manipulated, and how they will be measured.
Before a researcher can begin, they must choose a topic to study. Once an area of interest has been chosen, the researchers must then conduct a thorough review of the existing literature on the subject. This review will provide valuable information about what has already been learned about the topic and what questions remain to be answered.
A literature review might involve looking at a considerable amount of written material from both books and academic journals dating back decades. The relevant information collected by the researcher will be presented in the introduction section of the final published study results. This background material will also help the researcher with the first major step in conducting a psychology study — formulating a hypothesis.
Step 1 – Forming a Testable Hypothesis
Step 2 – Devise a Study and Collect Data
Step 3 – Examine Data and Reach Conclusions
Step 4 – Report the Findings of the Study
Testable hypothesis: a prediction that has beeen formulated specifically enough so that it is clear what observations would confirm the prediction and what observations would challenge it
Explain what you mean in your hypothesis.
How will the variables be measured in “real life” terms?
How you operationalize the variables will tell us if the study is valid and reliable.
Debriefing is an exchange of dialogue that occurs between a researcher and a participant after data collection. Researchers give a brief explanation of the purpose of the study, its logic, and its implications. They give their contact information in case the participants have questions or concerns about the experiment. The participants are given citations of one or two articles for more information about the research. Any manipulations performed and the rationale for using them is also explained during debriefing. Participants are given a chance to ask questions about the experiment. The researchers use simple language when conducting debriefing so that the participants do not feel like they are being buried with uninformative jargon (“Instructions for preparing,” 2007).
The purpose of debriefing is to make sure that the participants are restored to pre-experimental levels. They can be emotionally affected by research involving stress, manipulations of self-esteem, or strong emotional arousal. By explaining the research and manipulations used, debriefing attempts to make sure that the participants are as well-off after participation as they were before they participated in the experiment (“What is debriefing?”).
Researchers can choose to debrief immediately after participation or they can arrange a later time for group debriefing. However, if data collection involved manipulations of failure, strong humiliation, strong deception, or reduction in self-esteem, researchers should give each participant at least partial debriefing immediately so that participants are not harmed (“What is debriefing? ” ). They researchers should tell participants where they can talk to a counselor if they feel it is necessary and that the participants are free to withdraw their data if they like. Researchers should do debriefing orally in these cases. However, in other cases, debriefing can be in a written form. Participants can be handed a sheet of paper with the debriefing information (“Instructions for preparing,” 2007).
Debriefing Session:
References:
Instructions for preparing the debriefing form for the psyc 100 subject pool application. (2007, October 22). Retrieved from http://www.queensu.ca/psychology/Research/Subject-Pool/debriefingform.doc
What is debriefing? (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.depauw.edu/admin/acadaffairs/researchProtocols/IRB/Debriefing.html