Arlington Chamber Presentation_3_31_16 Janine Barbara and Bill Combined
1. Connecting Leaders to Enable
Sustainable Solutions
Presented by:
Janine Finnell
Clean Energy Ambassador & Founder
Leaders in Energy
Presented at:
Green Business Committee
Arlington Chamber of Commerce
Arlington, VA
April 1, 2016
2. Outline
I. Background
II. Mission & Key Building Blocks
III. Collaboration
IV. International Outreach
V. Leaders in Energy Members/Organizations
VI. On the Horizon
2
5. The Bad News We Are All Increasingly
Becoming Aware of:
Challenges:
Deforestation and habitat destruction
Soil problems (erosion, salinization, and soil
fertility losses)
Water management problems
Overhunting
Overfishing
Effects of introduced species on native species
Overpopulation
Increased per-capita impact of people
Anthropogenic climate change
Buildup of toxins in the environment
Energy shortages
Full human use of the Earth’s photosynthetic
capacity
5
6. Clean Energy & Sustainability
Developments Offer Potential to Transform
Economy
6
7. Florida Power & Light Company -- Martin Next Generation Hybrid Solar Plant
Hybrid Renewable/Fossil Systems
9. Transportation Alternatives
Images from 2016 Washington Auto Show
TOYOTA i-ROAD Personal
Mobility Vehicle
Janine Finnell and
Kabir Kabir with
John Davis,
MotorWeek Host
200-Mile
Electric
Range
Chevrolet
Bolt
Toyota Mirai
fuel cell
vehicle
10. Origins as
LinkedIn Group
November 2012
- Invited 25
members
2013
Recognition -
every 50th member
Happy Hours
events
Strategic Alliances
1000+ members
Leaders in Energy Timeline
2014
Structured
events with
speakers
Total of 12
Events, One
at Johns
Hopkins
University
10
2015
2016
Welcomed 2000th
member in 2/16
20 blog articles
Events at
GWU,.
DC Convention
Center, APPA,
and more
Events at
George Mason
U, Edison
Electric Institute,
United Nations
Association.
Became LLC
Received 501-
c-3 status
11. Connecting Thought Leaders
11
Building a global community
of professionals - members
connecting from around the
world
Enabling members to pursue
professional development
objectives
Transforming ideas from
thought leaders all over the
world:
to create synergies for action
and change
to make a difference in the
world
12. II. Leaders in Energy Mission
& Key Building Blocks
Mission: Building a community of leaders to enable
solutions to move us towards a more sustainable
energy system, economy, and world.
Attract and cultivate leadership talent from all generations in the
energy, environmental, and sustainability arena, e.g., individuals
from the Millennial, Gen X, Baby Boomer, and World War II
Generations
Open to ALL energy and sustainability solutions, e.g., technologies,
policies, social innovation, etc.
Utilize systems thinking and interdisciplinary collaboration
Help people to connect for green jobs and business opportunities to
create a more regenerative economy and world
12
16. 16
June 2015 Bioeconomy and Renewable Fuels Event
Speakers:
--USDA
--DOE
--Leaders in Energy
--BIO
--George Washington
University
--Green Suits
Sponsors:
--Clean Energy Research and Education Foundation
--DC Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
--Biogas Researchers Inc.
--Advanced Biofuels USA
--African-American Sustainable Business Committee
18. 18
Leaders in Energy ─ Organizations Partnered With and Speakers
Co-Hosting Organizations/Sponsors
• African American Sustainable Business Committee
• Alexandria Emerging Technology Center
• Alexandria Renew Enterprises
• American Public Power Association
• Arlingtonians for a Clean Environment
• Arlington Green
• Arlington Green Drinks
• Association of Energy Engineers National Capital Chapter/World
Energy Engineering Congress
• Biogas Researchers, Inc.
• Budderfly
• Business Radar
• Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy
• Clean Energy Leadership Institute
• Clean Energy Research and Education Foundation (CEREF)
• Connect 113
• Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) DC
• Council on Women in Energy and Environment
• DC Green Drinks
• DC Net Impact
• Eco Caters
• Johns Hopkins University
• LEVICK
• Longenecker & Associates
• OurEnergyPolicy.org
• Potential Energy DC
• Soapbox
• The George Washington University
• Virginia Tech (in process)
• WeWork
Speakers
• Aquicore
• Aracadian Center for Sustainable Food and Agriculture
• Arlingtonians for a Clean Environment
• Arlington County Energy Manager
• Center for the Advancement of the Steady State
Economy
• Center for Sustainable Food and Agriculture
• DC Sustainable Energy Utility
• Deloitte
• District Sun
• Embassy of The Netherlands (Scheduled)
• Foundation for Ocean Renewables
• George Mason University Center for Regional Analysis
• Independent Consultant with U.S. Energy Economics
Association National Capital Chapter (USAEE-NCC)
• Maryland Clean Energy Center
• National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration
(NOAA); National Weather Service
• TEDCO (State of Maryland)
• Smartpower
• SolarCity
• The George Washington University
• U.S. Department of Agriculture
• U.S. Department of Energy
• U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean
Energy Management
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
19. IV. International
Outreach
Scenarios for a
100% Renewable
Energy Global
ArchitecturePresenters:
Janine Finnell, Leaders in Energy
Silvia Leahu-Aluas, Leaders in
Energy
Adriaan Kamp, Energy for One
World and Leaders in Energy
Without Borders Partner
Google Hangout Session
February 29, 2016
1 pm EST
20. Overview of 7 Analyses on Moving
Towards 100% Renewable Energy
Architectures
1. Tracking Clean Energy Progress, International Energy Agency, 2015
2. 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) all-sector
energy roadmaps for the 50 United States, Mark Z. Jacobson et al;
Stanford University, 2015
3. Deep Pathways to Decarbonization, 2014 & Deep Pathways to
Decarbonization in the United States, 2015 Sustainable Development
Solutions Network
4. New Energy Outlook – Long Term Projections of the Global Energy
Sector, Bloomberg New Energy Finance, 2015
5. Energy (r)evolution, Greenpeace et al, 2015
6. Cost-minimized combinations of wind power, solar power and
electrochemical storage, powering the grid up to 99.9% of the time,
Corey Budischak et al. , University of Delaware, 2013
7. The Net Benefits of Low and No-Carbon Electricity Technologies,
Charles R. Frank et al, Global Economy and Development at BROOKINGS,
2014
20
21. V. Snapshots: Leaders in Energy Business Members
ArlingtonGreen
21
ArlingtonGreen’s (TM) mission is to
promote sustainable business practices
and lifestyles through outreach,
engagement, and education in order to
reduce impacts on the environment.
Through collaboration and partnership
among the many business, government,
and non-profit stakeholders,
ArlingtonGreen(TM) can have a greater
and more positive impact in its community.
Agustin Cruz, Founder/
Executive Director
Fostering Sustainable Business
Practices and Collaboration
703.489.9695
arlingtongreen.org
22. Biogas Researchers, Inc.
22
Implementing the Electric RFS
Jim Lemon, President
Michael Lemon, Vice President
Working to leverage the electric vehicles
(EVs) eligibility under the U.S. EPA
Renewable Fuel Standard “RFS” program
“Electric RFS pathway allows biogas-based
electricity to be considered a cellulosic
biofuels when used to power EVs.
This would enable anaerobic digesters to
participate in and benefit from the RFS
program.
23. High Road Strategies, LLC
23
Policy Research, Analysis &
Design
for a Sustainable Economy,
Environment and Workforce
Joel S. Yudken, Ph.D.
Principal
Examples of Studies & Reports:
• Supplying the Unconventional Revolution:
Workforce Readiness. (With IHS Economics). For
Energy Equipment and Infrastructure Alliance.
• The Economic Benefits of Military Biofuels. For
Environmental Entrepreneurs (and Natural Resources
Defense Council).
• Climate Policy and Energy-Intensive
Manufacturing. (With The Millennium Institute). For
Bipartisan Policy Center.
www.highroadstrategies.c
om
26. Janine Finnell
Email:
CleanEnergyAmbassador@lercpa.org
Phone: 703-203-0766
LinkedIn Group: Leaders in Energy
Research, Communications, Policies &
Analysis (LERCPA)
Facebook: www.facebook.com/LERCPA
Twitter: @LeadersinEnergy
Website: http://www.lercpa.org
Thank You for Your Attention
Join Our Community of Leaders!
26
27. Building the Circular Economy in the
DC/Maryland/Virginia Region
Presented by:
Barbara Englehart
Director, Business Sustainability
Leaders in Energy
Presented at:
Green Business Committee
Arlington Chamber of Commerce
Arlington, VA
April 1, 2016
28. Circular Economy
Transforming our Linear Processes
The circular economy refers to an
industrial economy that is restorative,
sustainable and collaborative by
intention. It relies on renewable and
clean resources: energy, water,
materials, land.Through careful
design, it aims to keep materials and
products in circulation for very long
cycles and eliminate waste.
Sustainable Manufacturing: Building a Circular Economy in Washington DC/Baltimore MD/Northern Virginia Region28
29. Move fromTinkering to Redesigning
Sustainable Manufacturing: Building a Circular Economy in Washington DC/Baltimore MD/Northern Virginia Region29
Reduce
Refuse
Reuse
Repair
Restore
Rent
To rebuild and rethink to
design waste out of the
system
Moving from tinkering
the current linear
processes
Repurpose
Remanufacture
Renovate
Recover
Rot
Recycle
12 Regenerative R’s
Reduce
Reuse
Recycle
3 Traditional R’s
31. Circular Economy in Action around the Globe
Sustainable Manufacturing: Building a Circular Economy in Washington DC/Baltimore MD/Northern Virginia Region31
32. Leaders in Energy Workshop on Circular Economy
Alexandria Renew Enterprises (March 2015)
Sustainable Manufacturing: Building a Circular Economy in Washington DC/Baltimore MD/Northern Virginia Region32
33. Circular Economy in Action in the DC Region
Sustainable Manufacturing: Building a Circular Economy in Washington DC/Baltimore MD/Northern Virginia Region33
35. Barbara Englehart
Email: barbara.englehart@gmail.com
Phone: 703-963-8924
LinkedIn Group: Leaders in Energy
Research, Communications, Policies &
Analysis (LERCPA)
Facebook: www.facebook.com/LERCPA
Twitter: @LeadersinEnergy
Website: http://www.lercpa.org
Thank You for Your Attention
Join Our Community of Leaders!
35
36. Opportunities for Expanding
The Biobased Economy
Presented by:
Bill Brandon
Chief Technology and Research Officer
Leaders in Energy
Presented at:
Green Business Committee
Arlington Chamber of Commerce
Arlington, VA
April 1, 2016
37. 37
June 2015 Bioeconomy and Renewable Fuels Event
Speakers:
--USDA
--DOE
--Leaders in Energy
--BIO
--George Washington
University
--Green Suits
Sponsors:
--Clean Energy Research and Education Foundation
--DC Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
--Biogas Researchers Inc.
--Advanced Biofuels USA
--African-American Sustainable Business Committee
38. Key Themes
I. Liquid fuels vs. electric personal
and heavy duty transportation;
II. Food sustainability, city and indoor
vertical farming; and
III. The biobased economy
38
45. III. The Bioeconomy
Many products on the market are now made from bio-chemicals.
Wetsuits, spandex and nylon are already on the market in limited
quantities. Many beauty care products and surfactants are being
enabled with microbial produced chemicals.
45
46. What is the GC3?
www.greenchemistryandcommerce.org
46
47. The Bioeconomy (continued)
Some biobased chemicals; can outperform petro based plastics.
Food packaging and plastic bottles will, within 5 years, be 100%
bio-plastics.
They are presently made from chemical intermediates BDO (which is
now being made from a biobased process) and PET, a petro-
chemical.
The bio-plastic industry, however, has developed a slight variation on
PET called PEF that is virtually impossible to make through a petro-
chemical route.
PEF results in a stronger plastic meaning thinner packaging
materials but also they have superior resistance to gas
penetration.
This means better food packaging. Foods that are susceptible to
oxygen, like beer and prepared vegetables will be available in plastic
bottles and containers.
Soft drinks, like 7-ounce coke will be available in plastic containers
rather than the aluminum and glass they now come in.
.
47
54. Message from IEA Executive Director,
Maria van der Hoeven,
International Energy Agency
ETP 2015 demonstrates that strategic action on clean energy
technologies at the national, regional and international levels has the
capacity to move the world closer to shared goals for climate change
mitigation.
Unfortunately, this report also shows that the current pace of
action is falling short of the aim of limiting climate change to a
global temperature rise of 2°C (in ETP modelling, the 2° Scenario
or “2DS”). Indeed, despite positive signs in many areas, for the first
time since the IEA started monitoring clean energy progress, not one
of the technology fields tracked is meeting its objectives.
As a result, our ability to deliver a future in which temperatures
rise modestly is at risk of being jeopardized, and the future that
we are heading towards will be far more difficult unless we can take
action now to radically change the global energy system.
54
55. 19 Technologies and Sectors Examined in
IEA Tracking Clean Energy Progress (TCEP)
55
Renewable power
Nuclear power
Natural gas-fired power
Coal-fired power
Carbon capture and storage
Industry
Iron and steel
Cement
Transport
Fuel Economy
Electric vehicles
Buildings energy efficiency
Building envelopes
Appliances, lighting and
equipment
Co-generation and DHC
Renewable heat
Smart grids
Energy storage
Hydrogen and fuel cells
• Report is divided into 19 technology or sector sections.
• TCEP focuses on whether the actions needed to decarbonize the
energy sector over the ten years to 2025 are progressing. It also
uncovers areas that need additional stimulus.
56. Key Findings of IEA Tracking Clean Energy
Progress – Renewable Power Generation
Renewable electricity generation is expected to grow by 45%
between 2013 and 2020, reaching 7 310 TWh, but is currently at
risk of falling short of the 2DS target of 7 537 TWh.
If current trends continue, the worldwide shortfall will increase
even further by 2025, when the 2DS target is 10 225 TWh. This
result is subject to strong regional differences across technologies
and regions.
56
57. Status of Renewable Energy Generation
57
Hydropower - Improvement
needed
Bioenergy - Not on track
Geothermal - Not on track
Solar thermal electricity - Not
on track
On Shore Wind - Not on
track
Solar PV – On track
Offshore wind - Not on track
Ocean – Not on track
59. 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight (WWS)
all-sector energy roadmaps for the 50 United States
Mark Z. Jacobson et al
In a new study, Mark Z. Jacobson, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at
Stanford, and colleagues, including U.C. Berkeley researcher Mark Delucchi, presents
roadmaps for converting the energy infrastructures of each of the 50 U.S. states to 100%
wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) for all purposes (electricity, transportation,
heating/cooling, and industry) by 2050.
The 50 individual state plans call for aggressive changes to both infrastructure and the ways
we currently consume energy, but indicate that the conversion is technically and economically
possible through the wide-scale implementation of existing technologies. The study’s authors
examined each state’s current energy usage in four sectors: residential, commercial,
industrial and transportation.
For each sector, they then analyzed the current amount and source of the fuel consumed—
coal, oil, gas, nuclear and renewables—and calculated what the fuel demands would be if
replaced with electricity. (This includes all the cars on the road becoming electric, as well as
homes and businesses fully converting to electric heating and cooling systems). They then
calculated how this new electric grid could be powered using only renewable energy
resources available in each state.
“When we did this across all 50 states, we saw a 39 percent reduction in total end-use power
demand by the year 2050,” Jacobson said. “About 6 percentage points of that is gained
through efficiency improvements to infrastructure, but the bulk is the result of replacing current
sources and uses of combustion energy with electricity.”
60. Source:
Energy
Environ. Sci.,
2015, 8, 2093--
2117 | 2113
Graphic from Jacobson - time-dependent change in U.S. end-use power
demand for all purposes (electricity, transportation, heating/cooling, and
industry), supply by conventional fuels and WWS generators, based on
state roadmaps.
61. Source: Incl. other state infographics
-
http://thesolutionsproject.org/resource/5
0-state-visions-infographics/
63. Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project
(DDPP)
Conceived by the Sustainable Development Solutions Network, a
UN organization, along with the Institute for Sustainable
Development and International Relations (IDDRI).
Idea was to create national working groups, each of which was
tasked to determine how individual nations might deeply
decarbonize their respective economies -- the goal being 80%
non-fossil by the year 2050.
The working group for the US was led by energy consulting firm
Energy & Environmental Economics (E3), the Lawrence Berkeley
National Laboratory, and the Pacific Northwest National
Laboratory.
64. DDPP Strategy
The basic strategy for decarbonizing the economy
involves:
First decarbonizing the electric grid,
Then switching to fossil-free electricity for numerous other
applications that currently burn fossil fuel, such as cars and
space heat:
This will mean an increase in overall demand for electricity,
even with efficiency improvements.
65. 4 Possible Pathways Considered in US
Report
The report considered four possible pathways to a decarbonized
future: a mixed-technology case, a high-renewables case, a
high-nuclear case, and a high-CCS (carbon capture and storage)
case. All four pathways will get us to 80% reduction in
greenhouse emissions by 2050, but the way they get there, and
the costs and investments required, vary widely.
The bottom line is that in the high-renewable pathway, we
would need to build 2550 GW of new capacity; in high-CCS,
we would need 700 GW of new capacity; but in the high-nuclear,
we would need only 400 GW of new capacity, in each case to
fully decarbonize the grid and reach 80% total greenhouse
reductions by 2050.
67. Key Projections from Bloomberg Outlook
By 2040, the world’s power-generating capacity mix will have
transformed: from today’s system composed of two-thirds fossil fuels,
to one with 56% from zero emission energy sources. Renewables will
command just under 60% of the 9,786 GW of new generating capacity
installed over the next 25 years, and two thirds of the $12.2 trillion of
investment.
67
The analysis assumes that renewables globally will see no further policy support – be that feed-in tariffs
or net energy metering – from 2018 onwards, except for offshore wind, which will see subsidies end
from 2030. It assumes carbon prices continue to exist where they are already in place or where we have
some confidence in their emergence. In particular, the forecast does not explicitly take into account the
long-term impacts of the US Clean Power Plan as it has not yet been finalized by the Environmental
Protection Agency.
68. Full report available here
Greenpeace International,
Global Wind Energy Council,
Solar Power Europe
Date: September 2015
#5
Source: Summaries and full report available
at
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/pu
blications/Campaign-reports/Climate-
Reports/Energy-Revolution-2015/
69. energy (r)evolution – Key Messages
100% renewable energy for all is achievable by 2050.
Fossil fuels should be phased out in stages
The Energy [R]evolution proposes a phase-out of fossil fuels starting with lignite (the most carbon intensive) by
2035, followed by coal (2045), then oil and then finally gas (2050).
The renewable energy sector is proving it can transform power generation.
Within the next 15 years, renewables’ share of electricity could treble from 21% today to 64%, so nearly two thirds of
global electricity would come from renewable energy
Heating and transport are the big challenge
Oil for heating will be replaced by solar collectors, geothermal and heat from renewable
hydrogen
Gas will be the last fossil fuel in use, but is replaced by hydrogen generated by renewable
electricity by 2050
Transport is the most challenging sector, and requires a technical revolution and more
R&D – particularly in aviation and shipping.
But planes and ships could be powered using biofuels, hydrogen and synthetic fuels produced using electricity.
The switch to 100% renewable energy will create as many jobs as are employed in oil and gas
today
There is a just transition, not an overnight change. There will be 2 million people still working in the coal industry in
2030, so there is time to re-train.
71. Corky Budischak et al, U of Delaware,
2013
The study models many combinations of renewable electricity sources (inland
wind, offshore wind, and photovoltaics) with electrochemical storage
(batteries and fuel cells), incorporated into a large grid system.
These scenarios are modeled using the PJM Power Grid to answer
questions on how reliable, and how costly, would be an electric system reliant
on renewable energy. Concludes that we can seek an intermediate 30%
target now, and seek a 90% target later, and with the right mix, at each
step the target will move toward lower costs than today's system.
At 2030 technology costs, and with excess electricity displacing natural
gas, we find that the electric system can be powered 90%–99.9% of
hours entirely on renewable electricity, at costs comparable to today's—
but only if we optimize the mix of generation and storage technologies.
The team created a new model called the Regional Renewable Electricity
Economic Optimization Model (RREEOM). The model was required to satisfy
electrical load entirely from renewable generation and storage, and to find the
least-cost mix that meets that constraint.
71
73. Brookings Institute Study (Charles R
Frank, Jr. et al, 2014)
This paper examines five different low and no-carbon electricity technologies
-- nuclear, hydro, natural gas combined cycle, wind, and solar -- and presents
the net benefits of each under a range of assumptions.
The study concludes that the net benefits of new nuclear, hydro, and natural
gas combined cycle plants far outweigh the net benefits of new wind or solar
plants.
The cost advantage of nuclear vs. renewables is more than three-to-one.
That means that for every dollar we spend on renewables, we could be
mitigating about three or four times more carbon by spending that dollar on
nuclear instead.
If key assumptions were modified to favor wind and solar. for example, if we
increase the price of carbon to $100 per ton, reduce the cost of capital to 5
percent, and reduce the capital cost and increase the capacity factor of solar
and wind by one-third, we get the results shown in Table 9C of report. A new
nuclear plant becomes the most favored alternative. Wind and solar continue
to rank fourth and fifth among all the alternatives, mainly because of the very
high capacity cost and the very low capacity factors.
73
75. Our Work and Activities
Exchange information and engage on clean energy, environmental,
and sustainability topics
Utilize online platforms
LinkedIn group (Leaders in Energy Research, Communications, Policies & Analysis –
LERCPA) with 2000+ members in Washington DC Metro Area, other areas of the United
States, and world; additional 1400+ in DC area in email announcements
Leaders in Energy Blog
Google Hangout Sessions
Conduct monthly professional networking and educational events to
CONNECT members on green jobs, business, research, professional
development, and project opportunities to create sustainable solutions
Workshops, e.g., Circular Economy
Collaborate and partner with other organizations on events with similar objectives, e.g.,
United Nations Association, American Council for Renewable Energy, etc.
75
Notas do Editor
Restorative and sustainable –
Collaborative – symbiotic – a diverse group working collaboratively
Renewable and clean resources
Energy – Alternatives to fossil fuels which take millions of years to form and emit carbon and pollution. Just had solar example. Solar, wind, hydro, geothermal.
Materials – again, finding alternatives that can rapidly renew. Alternatives to plastics. Bamboo and Cork over slow growth trees.
Water – manage scarce clean water and manage watershed
CLEAN - means keeping the toxics out.
Design – start at the beginning to plan.
Circulation – as opposed to current wasteful linear processes
Eliminate waste – look at everything as a potential resource and put it back in circulation
3 R’s around since 1988
Business Sustainability Framework from Englehart Consulting
The framework applies to any entity that purchases and consumes products and services, which can range from a small business, even a household, to a global corporation.
Barbara Englehart is a management and business sustainability consultant in the Washington DC region. She implements solutions that are good for the planet and good for the bottom line. with a business oriented approach. She uses the same technology and program management skills that she used at Verizon and MCI to launch Voice over the Internet in Europe and build professional network communications services around the globe. Barbara also uses her financial skills acquired as a CPA at Arthur Anderson and an MBA at the UCLA's Anderson School of Management. In partnership with Northern VA Regional Commission, Barbara founded and runs the Northern VA Sustainability Network of local governments, universities, and large corporations, a group dedicated to advancing sustainability in Northern Virginia. She is the chair of the Arlington Public School Sustainability Advisory Committee and adviser to the award winning Arlington Energy Masters Program.
If you need assistance assessing your impacts, making the business case, or implementing Sustainable solutions, please contact Barbara Englehart at Barbara.Englehart@gmail.com or 703-963-8924.
Barbara.Englehart@gmail.com
www.englehartconsulting.com
703-963-8924
Estimated at $1 trillion by 2020 and 100,000 jobs by 2025