BIOLOGY - THE MYTH OF EVOLUTION

Biology, the myth of evolution, by Scribe Valdemir M. Menezes
PURPOSE OF THIS WORK
The literary materials author not-for-profit, or generate
you any type of revenue. Book costs are only to cover the costs
of production, transportation, taxes and resellers. Your
satisfaction is to contribute to the good of education, a better
quality of life for all people and living things, and to glorify the
only Almighty God.
CONTACTS:
www.youtube.com/user/storytellervaldemir
www.facebook.com/menezes.scribe.3
Blog: teoriadaevolucao-biblia.blogspot.com.br
E-mail: valdemirelcristiano@hotmail.com
www.dailymotion.com/scribevaldemir
AUTHORIZATION
The book may be reproduced and distributed by any
means, used by any religious, educational or cultural entity
without permission of the author.
[ 2 ]

AUTHOR: Valdemir Mota de Menezes a degree in Biological
Sciences and History at the Metropolitan University of Santos, has the degree
in Business Administration and a Bachelor of Theology from the College of
the Assemblies of God of Santos, was born in Itabaiana/Sergipe/Brazil, in
1969.
[ 3 ]
M543 Menezes, Valdemir, 1969
Biology – The Myth of Evolution/ Valdemir Mota de
Menezes, Cubatao/SP,
Amazon.com Clubedosautores.com.br, 2015
145 p. ; 21 cm
ISBN-13: 978-1508536536
ISBN-10: 1508536538
1. Biology 2. Theory of evolution 3. Evolucionism
4. Criacionism I - Title
CDD 570
CDU 577

DESCRIPTION
This book BIOLOGY has the definite purpose of
refuting the theory of evolution and exalt God as the one
responsible for creating. We dedicate this volume to the Creator
that is very close to men, as the Scripture says in Acts 17.24-28.
Through this book, we tax God with the title of THE LORD OF
LIFE. Men announced this literature that their existence here
originated from a CREATION ACT and not a process of
evolution. The true believers in God, this book will reinforce
their beliefs regarding the origin of life and of man. Scientists
request reconsideration of theories that hinder the development
of science, noting that no belief should divert research at its sole
purpose: THE TRUTH.
[ 4 ]

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
I - THE PURPOSE OF BIOLOGY
II - ANATOMY
1 - Comparative anatomy
2 - Brain Power
3 - Hand Anatomy
4 - Skull
5 - Anatomy of the spine
6 - The prehistoric man
III - HISTOLOGY
1 - The skin
IV - CTOLOGY
1 - Chromosomes
2 - Number and size of cells
3 - Cellular Database
[ 5 ]

4 - Scourge Bacterial
V - PHYSIOLOGY
1 - vocal apparatus
VI - STOICHIOMETRY
1 - DNA
VII - BIODYNAMIC
VIII - ONTOGENY
1 - Embryology
IX - GENETIC
1 - Inheritance
2 - Hybridization
3 - Mutation
X - PHYLOGENY
1 - The history of living things
2 - Spontaneous Generation
3 - Inheritance of Acquired Characters
4 - Natural Selection
[ 6 ]

5 - Mutation
6 - The steps of evolution
7 - bipedalism
XI - BIOGEOGRAPHY
1 - Adaptation
XII - SYSTEMATIC
1 - The kingdoms
2 - Classification of man
3 - Family
4 - Kingdom Protista - Algae
XIII - PALEONTOLOGY
1 - The Ages
2 - Cambrian Period
3 - Missing Link
4 - The prehistoric man
A - Ramapithecus
B - Australopithecus afarensis
[ 7 ]

C - Australopithecus africanus
D - Australopithecus robustus
E - Homo habilis
F - Homo Erectus
G - Homo Sapiens
H - Homo neanderthalensis
I - Homo sapiens sapiens
J - Cro-Magnon
5 - Bible Paleontology
6 - Dating
A - Carbon 14
B - Potassium-Argon
CONCLUSION
1 – Consequences of Theory of Evolution
[ 8 ]

BIOLOGY
INTRODUCTION
Biology is the study of life, and this word was used the
first time by Lamarck in France in the year 1801. Our intention
in studying biology as a theological matter is mainly explained
by the THEORY OF EVOLUTION, as this philosophical
doctrine conflicts with the doctrine the biblical CREATION.
Only illustrative photo
It is the consensus among evolutionary scientists to determine how
the scientific arguments for the theory of evolution
This book will not make much use of the Bible to prove
the creation, has given that it is evident and clear that in all the
Scriptures this doctrine is strong. So our readers should
understand that we fight fire with fire, or try to use scientific
arguments to rebut the philosophical theory of evolution. More
[ 9 ]

than 100 years after Darwin and the theory of evolution has not
been proven and is, therefore, a vain philosophy.
THE LANGUAGE OF EVOLUTIONISTS
Evolutionists demonstrate the fragility of their theories
by own vocabulary that often they use when they try to explains
it. If evolution were true, their claims should be made with
conviction and not using dubious terms and citing possibilities
that most demonstrate the power of imagination of evolutionists
than proven facts.
Just to see our readers that we are not accusing
unfounded, let's see an example from a journal entitled matter
was ANCESTORS: A FAMILY ALBUM.
Maybe for some [...], there are signs [...], maybe [...], may have
occurred [...], it was believed [...], do not know if he [...],... this suggests [...],
may have been able [...], must have [...], may probably [...], may be also
likely it is believed [...], it is also believed likely possibly also likely [...], is
considered now believed [...], it was considered [...], scholars think that [...],
it may have been [...], most likely [...], must have [...], probably there is no
evidence [...], it is believed may have been [...], indicates that [...], it is
possible that [...], probably [...], is likely [...], another evidence suggests [...],
apparently were left [...], a great controversy [...], apparently [...], suggest that
were not [...], entirely understood, opens the door for new assumptions ... we
know almost nothing [...], there is no certainty about [...], evidence suggests
[...], remains uncertain [...], maybe they are [...], apparently [...].
(ILLUSTRATED SCIENCE, October 1982, page 44 to 51).
[ 10 ]

Lamarck, Jean-Baptiste (France, 1744-1829) This man
was wrong, but in the nineteenth-century science class said that
he was right.
I - THE PURPOSE OF BIOLOGY
Biology is divided into three classes:
A – Zoology.
B – Botany.
C - General Biology.
In turn, the General Biology is divided into five groups:
1 - BIOESTATICS SCIENCES
Studies living beings from the angle of a physical
structure. Are parts of these sciences:
[ 11 ]

A - Anatomy - studies the structure of living things.
B - Histology - studies the tissues of living organisms.
C - Cytology - studies the cells of living beings.
D - Morphology - studies the forms of living beings.
2 – BIODYNAMICS SCIENCES
Science represented by physiology:
A - Physiology - studies the activities and functions of
the body.
3 - BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES
Studies the interaction of chemistry in living things.
Subdivided into two sciences:
A - Stoichiometry - Analyzes chemical compositions in
living things.
B - Biodynamics - Analyzes chemical changes in living
things.
4 - SCIENCES BIOGENIC
Studying the origins of life on three aspects:
[ 12 ]

A - Ontogeny - studies the evolution of the living from
egg to the full development.
B - Genetics - studies the heredity.
C - Phylogeny - Study the history of living beings.
5 - SCIENCES BIOTAXICS
It is divided into three sciences:
A - Taxonomy - these scientific names of beings.
B - Biogeography - Study the factors that determine the
distribution of organisms on the planet.
C - Systematic - studies the groups of species.
There are also complementary sciences of biology that
are:
A - Paleontology - study the fossils that testify to the
traces of life millennia.
B - Ecology - studies the relationship among living
beings.
[ 13 ]

Simian skulls extinct, of men of different races, and the pieces of
refurbished skulls do not prove that men evolved from primates.
"The evolutionary process is blind" (Leakey) – picture
above, Johanson with the skeleton of Lucy. Evolutionists follow
a blind, and as Jesus said, "Both will fall into a pit" (Matthew
15:14).
II - ANATOMY
[ 14 ]

1 - COMPARATIVE ANATOMY
Evolutionists to defend the theory of evolution invoke
the "organ connecting principle”, that is, the relative position of
a organ in relation to other organs is always the same; this idea
is also called COMPARATIVE ANATOMY, whose author was
Saint-Hilaire.
Based on this hypothesis is that it claims to be the
monkey the closest relative of the man, as they have many
physical similarities with humans. However, we think it is going
too far, coming streaks of mythological to say that the apparent
anatomical similarity equivalent to proof of evolution, because
this argument is used by teachers and biologists who often, are
mere automatons, only know how to repeat what you learned in
school or university, but are unable to think freely, putting
proves the theory of evolution.
What can be proven with the appearance of similar
bodies? That human and other animals have evolved from each
other? And the amazing thing, to say that evolution from one
species to another was all by chance? This is how to explain
these machines called perfect life? Can give credit to Charles
Darwin, who did not even know of the existence of DNA and
did not even know the high complexity that exists in a single
cell?
[ 15 ]

The wings and the feet of birds, members of the human
body, the feet of the frogs, the flippers of seals and whales, the
legs and the wings of ducks, the hoofs of quadrupeds, what does
this have to do with evolution?
A wooden shack, a block house, a mansion filled with
aluminum and smoked glass, a building, or the Burj Khalifa in
Dubai Tower with its 828 meters tall, it could be argued that one
evolved from the other? There have been designed and built
according to the will of its creators? Matters of coincidence?
And look at these buildings are little comparisons near the
complexity of a living organism with its millions of
interconnected cells... Would it not have God the right and the
power to create living beings as well you pleased?
SATIRE REAL ESTATE EVOLUTION
"There are billion years was only wood and rafter ..."
[ 16 ]

"The accumulation of dust, there are 200 million years old,
formed walls ..."
"Frequent floods shaped ‘homepithecus’ there are 50 million years
ago."
"The emergence of the glass in the holes marked the beginning of
'homehabilis' there is a million years ago."
[ 17 ]

"The ‘homeerectus’ 500 thousand years ago already
had ornate columns."
"There are 200,000 years ago, new staircases and floors
jumped in real estate development."
[ 18 ]

"There are 20,000 years ago came the ‘buildings-
magnon’ already with social and service elevator."
The fact that a house be similar to other types of
constructions mentioned here, justifies believe in the
spontaneous evolution of building materials? The similarity of
the houses have in common like foundations, doorways,
windows, and ceilings, justify the belief that a wooden shack
after millions of years has become a luxury building? More
absurd still believe that grain inorganic materials over millions
of years, without a higher power without intelligence to lead it
managed to produce the perfect of machines of the universe: The
human being. There will be no white dresses men with an
enviable resume that will make me believe most fairy tale I've
ever met: The Theory of Evolution.
Darwin's caricature published in the journal The Hornet on 22
March 1871. Darwin was the greatest bluffer history, it applies the phrase of
George Burns, "Sincerity is everything if you get it defrauds you're done."
[ 19 ]

2 - MENTAL CAPACITY
The anatomical structure of the brain and skull
measures are not as important, as the size of the head worth
something the elephant and the whale would be smarter. But is
the incomparable intelligence of man that separates it from all
other living beings preventing any comparison of all animals to
man.
In "Life" magazine was published a statement of the
superiority of the human brain:
Brain neurons make thousands of links among them. But the extra
innumerable provided by the human cortex multiply almost to infinity the
brain's ability to observe and analyze data. And it is this absolute power to
cope with massive data sets on man an incomparably superior to any other
living thing class. (LIFE, June 28, 1963)
Still comparing the abysmal difference between men to
primates, Dr. Dobzhansky says the following:
"Chimpanzees are many superior to other non-human primates, in
memory, imagination and ability to learn. However, there is a vast gulf
between the intellectual capacity of chimpanzees and man. Symbolic
reactions can be learned by chimpanzees only with great difficulty, and their
frequency does not increase with experience and age." (THE BIOLOGICAL
BASE OF HUMAN FREEDOM, p 102).
[ 20 ]

Directors of the Jehovah’s Witness Association made
an interesting observation about this comparison between man
and animals:
"Yes, there is an unbridgeable gulf between man and animal. If
evolution were true, there would be no such gap. There would be
intermediate stages of intelligence, but these are not found anywhere.
Evolutionists claim that these stages were men 'prehistoric' that are now
extinct. But why would persist lower animals such as monkeys, while all men
'prehistoric', supposedly superior, disappeared? There were such men
'prehistoric' really?" (MAN DID GET HERE BY EVOLUTION OR BY
CREATION? p 77 in the portuguese version)
3 - HAND ANATOMY
Fossilized bones of Australopithecus Robustus hand,
dated 1.8 million years generated a controversy to the Theory of
Evolution. According to the professor at the University of New
York, Randall Susman, the fingers of this creature has a similar
configuration to the modern man and flexibility to handle stones
and bones, turning them into tools. Such an explanation placed
in doubt elsewhere in the theory of evolution: is that if the
"Robustus" could produce tools, then they should have survived
as the "homo". Because one disappeared, and another survived,
is another mystery. To say that "Robustus" fed up of vegetables
and the "homo" survived because besides vegetables also fed
meat is a poor argument.
[ 21 ]

The big difference from man to animals is not anatomical, but
spiritual and intellectual. The man has a spirit, animals do not. Man has a
psyche (soul) that gives the ability to have self-consciousness, to know the
universe and the existence of God, but the animals do not have is awareness.
4 - SKULL
Like the modern man's skull with skulls of prehistoric
men prove nothing for evolution. The more similar skulls of said
'prehistoric' are human races that were extinguished and the
differences can be explained by variations that can exist within
the same species. Examples of these variations are found until
today where there are small human as the pygmies and dwarves
reaching just over a meter high, to the Germanic type and some
African groups that often are the two meters high. The skulls of
Australopithecus are more extinct primate species than man's
evolutionary relatives.
[ 22 ]

Let's wake up to the truth, the Australopithecus were primates like
monkeys, were never evolutionary link of man, they became extinct and their
skulls remaining, attest that they were more like chimpanzees than for men.
"The skull similar to ours is not the man evolution of the link.
Neanderthal man is more extinct human race than link of evolution. "
5 - SPINAL COLUMN ANATOMY
In fact, the 'believers' in the evolution resort to any
arguments to convince people and themselves on the belief in
evolution, for example, the brazilian magazine “SEE” published
this cavernous explanation of back pain. Carefully read and
meditate on the monkey and the tiger legend. It's almost a shame
this little story, but people are more willing to believe this lie
than the legitimacy of the creation.
[ 23 ]

The back pain it is much older than imaginable. It began in Africa
for at least 10 million years. At that time, pressed by the scarcity of food in
the forests, Ramapithecus flocks, the original primate evolutionary line
leading to man, left to jump from branch to branch, and ventured timidly by
savannahs. The recognition of new ground was painful for tribe members. No
branches or vines to cling, they crept awkwardly in the bushes, on four legs.
The first nagging back pain crisis, a fable grateful to doctors, was one of
those raids. A Ramapithecus threatened by a ferocious tiger, grabbed a
stone with the front legs. In a sudden movement, rose on its hind legs and
flung against the predator. The stone hit the target, but the victory came at
a high price. The unprecedented effort to stay upright made the poor animal
go through a violent pain. The ancestor of man was the first effort to stand
- and invented back problems and back pain. Evils that come for millennia
the evolution of the human species. Since then, as a biological original sin,
the curse Ramapithecus divides humanity into two types of people: those
who have back problems and those who will still have. (Magazine 'SEE',
author: Aroldo Campos, 02.10.1988, page 48)
Staying creating absurd assumptions, without any
scientific proof, throwing everything into a far time is ugly ...
First we must understand that our bodies are designed to work
well within the limits of physics. Second, with the 'regression',
and not with evolution, came to the degeneration of the human
species, we were created to live forever, but with the fall of
mankind, we now have a nature similar to that of animals. So
our bodies deteriorate over time until we come to die. Specific
problems can cause back pain and disease in the general body.
When humanity began to consume too much sugar, we now
have major problems of caries in the teeth. The colonizers of
Brazil, Portuguese and Europeans had many caries, while the
native Indians of Brazil had no problems so far, this was related
[ 24 ]

to the habit of eating too much sugar. With the development of
toothpastes containing fluoride, decreased the caries problem
worldwide. Similarly modern habits of work and be sitting most
of the day, or at the office or sitting on the couch in seats that
damage the column, did increase the incidence of back
problems. Today the factories put up for sale ergonomic chairs
that best fit the column, more comfortable car seats for the
column, in addition, doctors have recommended exercises like
swimming and walking to strengthen the muscles around the
spine. These back problems are isolated and can be minimized
with the right attitudes. Even the famous doctor Drauzio Varella
in a series of Brazilian TV narrated a legend like this monkey
and tiger to show the origins of back pain. We should pay
attention to the fact that organic degeneration is a natural
process as a consequence of sin and disobedience (Romans
5:12).
5 - THE PREHISTORIC MAN
The shape of the prehistoric man is a major scientific
fraud and the worst, the helpless students of primary and
secondary schools are poisoned with belief in evolution as if it
were indisputable historical fact, but it is not all scientists think.
Indeed, Boyce Rensberger writing in Science Digest
agree that imagination, not evidence, was what shaped
prehistoric men. Boyce calls this morphological reconstitution
of Divination. Did you just acetic for the things of God, or you
also test the falsely called SCIENCE? (I Timothy 6:20).
[ 25 ]

THE ANTROPOART
The nearest idea that we can form the ancestors comes from
paintings and sculptures created by artists working with anthropologists.
Unfortunately, most of these works is based more on imagination than
on evidence. But there are also artists with natural knowledge, able to
recompose a hominid from a fossil bone. For that, you need to understand
enough of anatomy. Many of these bones have small grooves and brands,
each of which corresponds to the link with a particular muscle. Examining
the marks, the artist can estimate the original size of hominid musculature.
Following the indications of the bones, are produced replicas in
clay than would be the muscles, apply on the replicas, a plastic copy of the
bones; also with clay, empty, understood to have been fat-fulfill; Finally, if
all-covering with a final layer of clay, which is the skin.
Yet most of these reconstructions are only guessing exercises. The
bones, after all, cannot reveal the fleshy parts of the nose, lips, and ears.
Finally, the artists know they have to create between man and monkey. The
older is considered the specimen in reconstruction, more apelike will be the
way that will give you.
The guessing exercise often leads to misunderstandings. The
recent discovery of hominid footprints preserved showed how some artists err
in attributing to Neanderthals toes huge and divergent, similar to those of
monkeys. The footprints revealed that, millions of years before the
Neanderthals, foot hominid, was already thoroughly modern.
(ILLUSTRATED SCIENCE, October 1982, page 49)
III - HISTOLOGY
[ 26 ]

Apparently in the theory of evolution is an attack
against the Creator, invented purely to dismiss the truth of
creation and establish through propaganda the lies and the myth.
Histology is a serious branch of biology whose task is to
examine the tissues of animals, so, no skin tissue, histology
cannot testify for evolution. But then what we see in the Natural
History Museum, and the history books? Ivan Lissner says:
Hence the incredible stupidity of all attempts to reconstruct the
Neanderthal man, or even of Beijing. (MAN, GOD AND MAGIC - New
York, 1961, page 304)
Not even once been seen by any scientist a piece of
prehistoric man's skin, but then where do these conceptions of
caveman with skin covered with hair?
The vast majority of artistic conceptions is based more on
imagination than on evidence [...] The artists need to create something
between ape and human; the older is said to be the specimen; the more
apelike make it. (SCIENCE DIGEST, April 1981, page 41).
ART OR SCIENCE?
Figures Zinjanthropus below, show how it is impossible
to reconstruct hair, eyes, nose, lips and facial expression as
having pieces basic bones. However, the media propagates the
[ 27 ]

theory of evolution concept as the purest science. Who does not
agree with the theory of evolution is taxed to illiterate and
superstitious person.
Zinjanthropus as designed and published in the magazine
"National Geographic" in 1960.
Zinjanthropus, produced by Maurice Wilson at the request of Dr.
Kennedy P. Oakley.
[ 28 ]

Zinjanthropus whose design was published on April 5, 1964 by the
magazine "Sunday Times."
The Zinjanthropus designed by Neave Parker to Dr. LSB Leakey.
Copyright, The Illustrated London News & Sketch, Ltd., 09/01/60.
1 - SKIN
The histology study the tissues of living beings and
what was found so far is antagonistic to Evolution. Which leaves
us angry, however, is the unbiblical belief of evolution, and the
[ 29 ]

worst, receiving the endorsement of scientists without, however,
satisfy the requirements needed to be certified as true.
As our readers can see, the Ramapithecus and
Australopithecus and even 'homos' appearing in prints, show
such 'prehistoric men' with hairy leather covering the entire
body. However, there is no way to prove that the skin covering
the few bones findings were hairy. So Gordon Childe said:
Man has not, and probably never had a hairy leather. (A
CULTURAL EVOLUTION OF MAN, Rio de Janeiro, Zahar, p 32)
The man was never as hairy monkey, were also men like us who
painted the caves.
IV - CYTOLOGY
1 - CHROMOSOMES
[ 30 ]

Chromosomes are elements that make up the nucleus of
cells, having an important role in heredity, for in them are
contained in the GENES. The spiral part of GENES is called
chromonema whose number varies according to the tissue, the
stage of reproduction and according to species, of which the
number of chromosomes is FIXED IN EVERY KIND, for
example, we have:
SPECIES - NUMBER OF CHROMOSOMES
Man 46
monkey 48
Coffee 44
Fly drosophila 08
Darwin was unaware of the complexity of cells and did not even
know what it was DNA.
[ 31 ]

As we can see the existence and function of
chromosomes are more adjusted to the idea of creation than with
the idea of evolution, each species has its amount of
chromosomes and this establishes a cellular difference from one
species to another who testifies in favour of that the Bible says
in Genesis 1:11, 12, 21, 24 and 25 "Produce each according to
its kind." Many evolutionists cite the number of chromosomes
monkey is near the number of men, but that does not certify
anything since coffee also has number of chromosomes to the
next man.
The process that causes a cell to turn into a human body
is mysterious:
"I fear that biologists have to confess that does not have hardly any
idea about how this is done. Surely it must involve something more than
merely chemical processes. "(THE NATURE OF LIFE, 1962, page 67)
The process of developing a cell in a full body
suggests an intelligent highly complex program, never by
chance:
The whole process looks very much to the development of an
organized structure, starting from a relatively simple system. The protein
molecules and fat in the yolk appear to be placed in position to form an
orderly and highly complex system, somewhat similar to the process by
which a house is built of brick, wood, and glass, according to a
predetermined plan [...] The machine seems to work, in other words, a
highly intentional, and has applied to it the term 'organizer' [....]. There seems
to be a guiding principle in operation. (SCIENCE TODAY, page 25, 26)
[ 32 ]

2 - NUMBERS AND DIMENSIONS OF CELLS
In 1665 the scientist Robert Hooke discovered cell (this
word means 'voids'), later, it was discovered that all living
beings, animals or plants are formed by cells, only certain
creatures have a cell as is the case of amoebae, mushrooms, and
certain bacteria. There are also multicellular beings who are
most in the world. Man is comprised of more than one
quadrillion cells. Although we can say with some differences in
the dimensions of the cells are astounding, for example, a human
ovum is microscopic, having only 0,200mm (200 microns),
while the chicken egg is a single cell!
CELL REPRODUCTION: exorbitant differences in how these
species, leads us to accept the creation or evolution as a fact?
[ 33 ]

GOD, THE LIFE ARCHITECT: The DNA is similar to a magnetic
tape containing detailed architectural plans. No doubt, a more intelligent
mind that human invented the DNA.
3 - DATABASE CELL
Evolutionists cannot prove that a cell has evolved, as
this particle, although microscopic, has amazing information,
able to build the anatomy of all living beings. I wonder who did
the most complex database program of the universe?
CELL is like a city that keeps in a library, a large
encyclopedia of 46 volumes: The 23 pairs of chromosomes.
The CHROMOSOME is like a book with thousands of
pages where all the genetic information of the human body.
The GENE and as a section on how to synthesize
proteins (skin color, for example, is a result of the presence or
absence of melanin).
The TRIPLET is like a word that specifies an amino
acid or stop a chemical reaction or the beginning of another
process.
The NUCLEOTIDE is like a letter that describes
everything that is alive.
4 – BACTERIAL FLAGELLUM
[ 34 ]

Engines arise not alone...
Several scientists show the reasons that made him
abandon the theory of evolution in the way of Darwin. New
scientific discoveries in biochemistry, especially considering the
amino acids and their functions in the body, and the study of the
bacterial flagellum, should instigate and persuade scholars to
consider the argument that the complexity of life agents, can
only be explained by an intelligent creator, fate could not have
created these extremely complex systems of life. Darwin did not
have access to this information under the microscope. Today,
many scientists embrace the concept of intelligent design, this
means: There was an intelligent creator who designed life.
The publication the Evolution Controversy says: "The bacterial
flagellum has a rotor motor that rotates at a speed of 6000 to 17,000 rpm.
Even more surprising is that it can change direction with just a quarter turn
and then turn the 17,000 rpm in the other direction "New Scientist magazine
calls the bacterial flagellum of" excellent example of complicated molecular
system - one complex nanomachine is beyond the skill of any human
engineer. "
According to biochemist Michael Behe, the bacterial flagellum is
also an irreducibly complex system. This means that this system will only be
able to perform its basic function if all parts are present and working
interactively. As we remove any of its parts, it ceases to perform its basic
function […].
Behe likes to use the example of the trap. The trap is a mechanism
designed to catch rats. This mechanism consists of a few parts that work
interactively. The joint work of these parts causes the trap to work and
[ 35 ]

perform its function. If any of these parts are missing, the trap will not work.
Therefore, it is essential that all parts are present for the mousetrap to work.
Thus, the bacterial flagellum is a mechanism that cannot have
evolved. According the evolution, the flagellar motor was forming gradually.
Their working parties would have emerged gradually. As the flagellar motor
only works if it is complete, the lack of any of its parts become useless or
inoperative system. As a useless structure could be preserved by natural
selection? Evolutionists try to answer this question claiming that the
incomplete flagellar motor could have had other uses. For this resort to Co-
Option:
The Intelligent Design critics generally resort to the theory of co-
option in an attempt to "prove" that the flagellar motor is derived from
natural and random processes. But there is a flaw in this theory: According to
Co-Option, the bacterial flagellum was formed with other parts of the oldest
molecular machines. We know that the bacterial flagellum is formed by 40
structural parts. Ten of these parts were found in another molecular machine
(a bacterium that has a kind of syringe instead of flagellum). However, the
other 30 shares are unique (only exist in the bacterial flagellum). If the
argument is that natural selection used parts of other molecular machines that
existed before the flagellum, where she got these 30 unique parts?
(http://guerrovacriacionismo.spaceblog.com.br/1802247/Motores-Nao-
Surgem-Sozinhos-Flagelo-Bacteriano/)
V - PHYSIOLOGY
1 - MACHINE VOCAL
[ 36 ]

One of the most difficult points of evolutionists
explains is the language used by man and animals are far from
resembling. According to the theory of evolution, shrews (a type
of mouse) changing their habitat, were living in the forests, up in
the trees, and eventually, became chimpanzees and gorillas and
continued eating plant foods. Those who were for the savannah,
began to eat with effort, because the foods were dispersed, and
this, according to the theory of evolution, has eased the
development of intelligence, and the fact that walking upright,
would have changed the physiology of the vocal tract. However,
even if we considered these mere assumptions as facts, there are
problems insoluble for the argument of evolution, as published
in the magazine Superinteressante in one of his articles about
evolution:
If that explains how did the unit capable of emitting around 50
basic sounds [...]. does not explain why humans began to use it to
communicate with one another. In addition, it is unknown when the vocal
tract began to be used to produce language. (SUPERINTERESSANTE)
After several studies with chimpanzees, especially with
the monkey Washoe, scientists reached the following
conclusions:
Chimpanzees are able to associate symbols to objects, but not true
sentences make much less to express ideas. While a child can learn any
language has spoken around her, chimpanzees are not able even to utter the
most rudimentary forms of human languages. In fact, there are many cases of
children who speak several languages. One of those, with only five years,
spoke eight languages fluently. Commenting on the vocal tract and the ability
[ 37 ]

to communicate, a scholar ended: Remains the most inexplicable aspect of
evolution. (THE BRAIN: THE LAST FRONTIER, p 59, 69)
Taking into account the physiological and linguistic
aspects of the language of men, the magazine Science News
Letter published the following news:
States Dr. Mason, an expert on American languages: The idea that
the 'wild' speak in a series of grunts and cannot express many concepts
'civilized' is completely wrong [...]. The evolution of language, found Dr.
Manson, is extremely otherwise of biological evolution. Language evolved
towards the complex to the simple. (SCIENCE NEWSLETTER, 03/09/1955)
This statement of Dr. Mason fits more with the creation
and degeneration of the languages of the Theory of Evolution.
The monkey Washoe learned 150 meanings of the language of the
deaf and dumb, but unlike men, the monkey cannot express ideas, man is
different, because it was created with the breath of God, the spirit, which
gives man incomparable attributes.
Human organs are many well defined and highly
complex or they have already been created with these
mechanisms, or for millions of years were deformed and useless
[ 38 ]

organs. For example, one eye is comprised of many intricate
parts, missing them or without being fully formed; the vision is
useless to see. So is unimaginable bodies in a slow evolution
(thousands or millions of years) until they are ready.
EAR is a perfect machine than a recorder. The recorder
has evolved, or was created by an intelligent mind?
EYE is a perfect machine than any camera or
camcorder. These machines have evolved by themselves or were
created by an intelligent mind?
[ 39 ]

UTERUS is a perfect machine than any industrial
machine, machines emerged spontaneously or were designed by
an intelligent mind?
Vocal tract is a perfect machine than any sound system
invented by man, so the logic forces me to accept that life and
man are on the planet because they were created and not because
they evolved in a disorderly manner and without purpose.
[ 40 ]

Human organs are properly set in a perfect organization
so that all functions as a supermachine. Cars are infinitely
simpler. Do you believe that there is any car that evolved alone,
out of nowhere, by chance, without intelligent intervention?
SMELL is such a complex device that recently only,
men were able to imitate the Creator and invented the chemical
smell sensor. But it is a ridiculous device close to what God has
done. Our nose has 20 million sensory cells. Is good for you? Or
think little? Well, God made a pet (dog) which has about 100
million sensory cells connected to the central nervous system. Is
good for you? Do you think all this wiring is by chance?
[ 41 ]

HEART is perfect than any engine. It works until the
last day of our lives, is an extremely strong muscle, his strength
pumps blood around the body. Every day your heart must beat
more than 100,000 times to pump 1800 liters of blood for more
than 60,000 miles of blood vessels. Do you know any engine as
perfect as the heart? Automotive and industrial engines are
simple near the heart. Then the heart appeared slow and gradual
chemical reaction to perfect and is up and running? As the
animals lived while the heart was evolving? Will the engines of
Mercedes and Ferrari emerged chaos, out of nowhere, without
any engineer put your hand?
[ 42 ]

RESPIRATORY SYSTEM human is perfect than
carburetor and automotive electronic injection. But the
evolutionist cannot realize that the more complex a machine,
more intelligent was their creator. So I would attribute to chance
the appearance of the respiratory system and the carburetor I
assign as the work of an intelligent mind? We need to stop being
induced pseudo-intellectuals who want to 'rape' our brain,
forcing us to believe in a theory that attacks the reason and
common sense. If you are an atheist, it's your problem! But use
logical reasoning and not by robotic evolutionary propaganda
that plague the media and the contemporary educational system.
VI - STOICHIOMETRY
In biology, there is the branch of stoichiometry
studying the chemicals in living things. Chemists have extensive
knowledge of these substances and are not surprising that they
can create drugs that help a weakened life, but if life could
EVOLVE chemical material, today we would have human being
[ 43 ]

produced in laboratories simply mixing chemicals and not in the
womb of woman as it has been from the beginning. If the theory
of evolution was scientifically proven, chemists and biologists
should create a living being water-based, minerals,
carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, and enzymes. But they cannot
and will. Genetic manipulation, artificial insemination or ‘in
vitro’ fertilization are not even close to what can be defined as
creating life in the laboratory from inanimate material or
substance as preach evolutionists, it never happened. Therefore,
astronomer Robert Jastrow said:
To the chagrin of them, scientists do not have need of an answer,
because chemists have never had success in reproducing the experience of
nature on the creation of life from inanimate matter. Scientists do not know
how it happened. (THE ENCHANTED LOOM: MIND IN THE UNIVERSE,
New York, 1981, p 18)
The Creator (God) designed the sperm as drivers of
animal life at fertilization and mating process.
1 - DNA
[ 44 ]

The deoxyribonucleic acid is the substance responsible
for the construction of all cells of living beings. Some writers
call the DNA of microscopic computer. Here are some concepts
that divine wonder:
The deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is an organic compound whose
molecules contain the genetic instructions that coordinate the development
and functioning of all living organisms and some viruses, and bringing the
hereditary characteristics of each living being. Its main role is to store the
necessary information for the construction of proteins and RNAs. DNA
segments that contain the genetic information are called genes. The rest of the
DNA sequence has structural significance or is involved in regulating the use
of genetic information. (WIKIPEDIA, accessed 31/12/2014)
Your personal DNA finds itself splashed across his body in about
60 trillion dots - the average number of living cells in the adult human [...].
Surprisingly, the DNA molecule has a basically simple. It consists of two
interlaced aspire, like the tape queued atoms connected together at regular
intervals by crosspieces - like a spiral staircase [...]. There is a long slender
logic in the form of DNA; give you the ability similar to magnetic tape
recording, storing the huge amount of information needed for life. Even the
strands of DNA are sugar and phosphate; stair sleepers snail are composed
of nitrogen, His varied in sequence strands of DNA directs the events that
cause the body to grow - very similar to the way the tiny changes in magnetic
tape producing, according to their order, the sounds of music [...]. Dr. Beadle
says that if the instructions encoded in the DNA of a single human cell
were translated into English, would fill an encyclopedia of 1,000
volumes.
While the DNA within the nucleus is giving orders that stimulate
growth, digestion, heartbeat, thought and feeling. Follows its own intrinsic
plan that has brought you through the corridors of time. It makes no changes
to this plan, unless they imposed on it by radiation accidents or from outside
the cell. (READER DIGEST, October and 1962: 144 and 148)
[ 45 ]

The conclusion by the statement that DNA does not
allow the organism to develop outside the pre-established
pattern, radiation coming from outside the cell could not make
any changes that were not harmful.
If the code is truly universal [...], is not subject to mutation.
(Scientific American, October 1963).
DNA is the principal agent of the fabrication of living
beings and is the time it reaches the sperm nucleus of the egg
that is provided by the combinations cells of man and woman. In
the Bible, the book of Psalms 139.14-16 there is a reference to
the DNA of the mechanism:
I praise you because fearfully and wonderfully made, marvelous
are thy works, and my soul knoweth right well. My frame was not hidden,
when I was made in secret, and woven together in the depths of the earth.
Your eyes saw my unformed body, and in thy book all my members were
written, which in continuance were formed day to day, when as yet there
was none of them.
In the magazine "LIFE" was published an article
showing the greatness of DNA, which has only one explanation
for this micro engineer - GOD.
The egg fertilized contains in its tiny core not only all the genetic
instructions for the development of a human body, but also protective
equipment - Amino Acid, umbilical cord, placenta and all that makes possible
the existence of the embryo in the womb. (LIFE, 30.04.1965).
Note well that inanimate matter cannot reproducer
inanimate matter, much less produce animate matter. The fact of
[ 46 ]

inanimate matter contain enzymes and proteins, which in turn
are essential substances to living beings, not scientifically
justified belief in evolution. The theory of evolution cannot
explain how life arose without having to disregard these
biological laws. We, creationists, agreed to gender, number and
degree to the REAL science, as if life comes from life, as taught
Pasteur, then we are right to say that God is the Creator of all
living things. As for the origin of God, that is no problem for us
to explain, for God, according to the Bible, is so powerful that it
exists for all eternity, and to understand the existence of God,
just we use the MATH explanation of negative numbers that
have not end. Likewise, God is the Lord of mathematics and
superior to it, has no beginning or end (negative and positive
numbers are infinite, as the past and the future of God). We
conclude that the only scientific and philosophical explanation
for the existence of life is God. So the Bible calls Jesus THE
LIFE AUTHOR (Acts 3:15).
[ 47 ]

As the science is revealing the mysteries of the human body and its
high complexity, the more it becomes clear that this is not by chance. Only a
mind, a trillion times higher ours could have created the energy, matter and
living beings. God, the Lord of Life.
CELL CONTROL
Cancer is the abnormal growth of a cell that can
generate a tumor. Daily, DNA does trace the cell to detect
anomalies, exercising, a cell control to prevent the degeneration
of the cell.
All our cells have mechanisms to prevent neoplastic
transformation. These mechanisms are known as control systems can be
divided into: mechanical, chemical and genetic systems. One the concepts
that most people are unaware of is that when we have a proliferation of
neoplastic cells, many of them are destroyed by these control systems, clearly
for some reason, for the other remaining cancer cells, these same systems not
work, but we would not have the cancer, right? A very efficient mechanical
[ 48 ]

system is called contact inhibition. When cells in a tissue that is repairing, for
example, know the time to stop dividing not to go beyond the ordinary? The
answer is in touch! When cells that are dividing abut immediately stop their
division. (UNIMES, Degree in Biology from the Metropolitan University of
Santos, 2012)
I understand that these control systems that destroy the
cancer cells are systems created by God so that life could
develop. It is not by chance and by accident that determined
these rules in the DNA. God made it the program that makes the
cells rotate this program and implement what is already
determined by Him.
VII - BIODYNAMICS
Biodynamic studies the chemical changes in living
things. Today we know how much is sophisticated living
organism and as a species evolved into another is extremely
difficult to explain and even worse, try. Given this recent
discovery, Loren Eiseley said:
Intensified effort revealed that the very amoeba, supposedly
simple, was a complex plant, a chemical plant of auto operation. The concept
that was just a simple bubble, whose chemical composition, once discovered,
will allow us to start instantly up the viral process, have proved at best,
monstrous caricatures of truth. With the failure of these efforts, the science
was in the embarrassing position of having to postulate theories of origins of
life that she could not demonstrate. After censor theologian, for your
[ 49 ]

confidence on myth and miracle, science found itself in the position that had
the nothing enviable, of having to create their mythology. (A HUGE DAY, p
164)
1 - COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY
No serious scientist should consider the biochemical
argument compared as quoted below:
Fish eliminate ammonia, amphibians eliminate urea, and reptiles
eliminate uric acid. Since an avian embryo initially removes ammonia, urea
later, and finally, uric acid; is a repetition of phylogenetic nitrogen
metabolism. (CERED, Goal collection, p 72)
Evolutionists seek create outlandish theories about
evidence of such a development. An example is the analogy
cited above. But think of a fable about the evolutionary origin of
the car. Imagine that someone claimed that the car made of sheet
metal was not built in the metallurgical, or the sheet made in
steel, but that the following explanation: "There were several
metal bedpans, where almost all the natural selection eventually
succumbed not survive oxidation, but some managed to adapt
and become in wheelbarrows, the evolutionary process followed
for a long time, some links that prove this evolution is the 'stove-
erectus', and later, as measuring 1.70 meter the ‘refrigerator cro-
magnon’ and finally the ‘auto-sapiens’ was the crowning of
evolution."
If you think this absurd explanation, I also think!
[ 50 ]

2 - FEATURE OF LIVING
Studying biodynamic we are led to consider all the
differences among living things and inanimate materials. Such
differences are so great that any intelligent person will wonder:
How life can come from inanimate matter? And that continues
with no evolution of ore to organic life? Let's look at the
differences among the ore and the life:
A - CHEMICAL COMPOSITION
The ore is usually comprised of an element (iron, gold,
silver), while no living element, even microscopic cell, it
consists of various elements such as carbon, hydrogen, iron,
oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, potassium and
magnesium. In addition, living organisms synthesize organic
substances and, hence, are constantly changing their chemical
composition, as the minerals, their compositions are fixed.
B - CELL ORGANIZATION
The cellular structure that makes up living things
distinguishes them from minerals. The multicellular beings still
behave as a unit because the mechanism of self-regulation
establishing cooperation among all parties. The inanimate matter
does not have these mechanisms.
[ 51 ]

C - METABOLISM
The minerals do not have the metabolic capacity which
is the process to obtain food (assimilation), and the process of
releasing this chemical energy activities and removing products
that are expelled (dissimilation). These are the characteristics of
living things that distinguishes it from inanimate materials.
D - REPRODUCTION
Minerals do not reproduce, unlike the living beings that
the natural processes produce a being like him.
E - GROWTH
Living beings can regenerate parts destroyed; in large
animals this process is called healing. Inanimate materials are
destroyed by erosion and have no ability to restore itself.
F - CYCLE VITAL
All living things have a life cycle that is born, grows,
reproduces, ages and dies.
G - STIMULUS
All living matter reacts to external variations, for
example: If you play water in the cat he runs, but the minerals
do not react to any external variation.
H - ADAPTATION
[ 52 ]

Living beings react internally adapting to the
environment, inanimate matter does not react chemically
looking to adapt to the environment.
ABSTRACT
Many biology textbooks bring this explanation of living
beings. However, despite these insurmountable differences
between living beings and inanimate, the theory of evolution
insists that life arose from inanimate matter, making an attack on
biology.
VIII - ONTOGENY
There is a principle in the biogenesis that says. "Life
comes from life" All the research done so far in all branches of
biology support this statement. The hen lays an egg and the egg
to go way the growing chick, becomes a chicken, and this is the
process of birth, growth and reproduction is repeated
indefinitely, no sparrow or ostrich out of the hen's egg, let alone
an inanimate matter.
1 - EMBRYOLOGY
[ 53 ]

Embryology is branch of ontogeny and as its name
says, studying the embryo. Evolutionists use the argument of
embryology compared to prove the theory of evolution.
Animals of different species, when in the embryonic stage, are
very similar [...]. The explanation is that we descended from animals where
such bodies were functional. (GENETICS AND EVOLUTION, Cered, p 72).
The development of embryos shows that each takes the form
according to its kind. The embryology compared supports the creation or
evolution? When an architect begins to outline a project, it starts with simple
lines until a succession of traces, leads to the development of specific
projects. So God created life, the first divine trait is the first embryonic stage,
after the divine computer program (DNA) will designing specific lines going
shaping life forms according to its kind.
Wanting to prove the theory of evolution because the
embryos are similar is a weak argument that supposedly can
only be a joke, but in the classroom, students and teachers have
to accept the doctrine of the school curriculum with the same
[ 54 ]

degree of belief that any religious, so it is said that: "More
important to get knowledge, you have the ability to reason and
draw conclusions."
Nothing in nature is by chance, see how the Great Scientist
designed the egg.
IX - GENETIC
Genetics is the part of biology that studies heredity,
whose biological mechanism transmits the characteristics of the
fathers to the children.
1 - THE INHERITANCE
Heredity is controlled by several independent genes.
Was Daven-Port which ranked the two pairs of genes that
determine the inheritance. The genes A and B increase the
intensity of pigmentation, the pairs of genes taxpayers,
represented by capital letters, and non-taxpayers symbolized by
lowercase letters
[ 55 ]

Genes work with scope for variation within species, not
progressing to other species. The way passes the genetic heritage reveals the
organization of biological elements and this makes us suppose that someone
created this system. Genes are created programs, it is not the work of
evolutionary chance.
2 - HYBRIDIZATION
The hybrid is one of the greatest proofs that God
established genetic boundaries between species preventing
animals from different species cross, and when cross not
reproduce. But, also, among those who reproduce, the offspring
are born dead, and among certain species, hybrids living
descendants, are not fruitful more than three generations, and
later became sterile.
The first to speak of the importance of crosses between
species for the study of heredity was the Greek Aristotle in the
third century BC. In the eighteenth century AD, Leuwenhoeck
(1632-1723), through experiments with rabbits white and gray,
discovered the gene dominance and regressive. Finally, Mendel
[ 56 ]

formulated his laws which established several points of this
science.
Let's look at four laws of hybridity:
§ 1 - Crossing two hybrids together, in almost all cases
not reproduced. When there is reproduction, the offspring are
infertile.
§ 2 - The hybrids can reproduce indefinitely in
phanerogams plants, higher plants and the following animals:
camel one hump with camel two humps and rabbits with hares.
§ 3 - The hybrids are fertile, but in 3 or 4 generations at
most, between species like the dog and the jackals.
§ 4 - The hybrid refuse the cross.
Importantly, we do not know the details of species
division as the vision of God in Genesis 1:12, 21, and 25,
however, God established the rule that each species reproduce
within their own species. The canine family with its internal
variety (dogs, wolves, jackals and foxes) do not mix with the cat
family (cats, tiger, lynx and lion). Therefore, among these, nor
considering mating and reproduction of offspring. Professor
Dobzhansky confirms what the word of God said long ago:
Never saw any individual in respect of which it could be in doubt
if it belongs to the species of cats (Felis domestica) or species of lions (Felis
leo). The two species are different because of the absence of intermediate.
Therefore, one can safely say that any cat is unlike any lion [...]. What has
[ 57 ]

just been said with respect to the species 'domestic felis' and 'felis leo',
applies also to numerous other species pairs. Are both between different
groups of animals and plants, among the simple structures as well as from the
many complexes. The formation of different groups is almost universal that
must be considered fundamental characteristics of the organic diversity.
(GENETIC AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES, p 5:06)
Mare and donkey can produce mule or donkey, but these are sterile
because reached the limit of their species.
The animals of the same genus may even cross with
different species, however, hybridity is the separation
mechanism that prevents the development of a new species
originated by interbreeding.
In the process of hybridization, crosses between two different
species of the same genus (in most cases) in order to combine the best
qualities of both [...]. The new hybrid is often stronger than any parent.
[ 58 ]

Sometimes the seed is sterile and requires constant hybridization.
( BIOLOGY FOR TODAY, p 294).
We can conclude this part of our study on the theory of
evolution, saying that science has already given its approval
with respect to Genesis 1:11 which says: “Give fruit according
to its kind" The hybrid rule out the emergence of new species by
crossing as said zoologist Richard B. Goldschmidt:
Nowhere is implemented the limits of species, and these limits are
separated from the boundaries of the closest species by the impassable gap,
which also includes sterility. (THE MATERIAL BASIS OF EVOLUTION, p
168)
New hybrid species exist only in science fiction or pictures by
computer manipulation. There was no evolution of species, and at this point
there is no species in transition. All species are fully set out in the world,
there are no examples in the transitional nature.
[ 59 ]

Genetic engineering can improve certain characteristics of a
species by various processes, especially hybridization, but has never been
created in the laboratory a new species of animal or plant that can break the
sterility of that new hybrid species. The Creator has placed limits, God is the
legislator's genetic code. Pictured above is an example of a wild maize and
genetically modified maize compared to the same coin. This is not evolution
of the species, is genetic manipulation.
3 – MUTATIONS
The contradictions of the Theory of Evolution are
everywhere, one of them says that the mutations were important
mechanisms for the process of evolution. Proponents
acknowledge that humanity has never seen a new species arise
under the influence of mutations.
According to the theory of evolution living beings undergo
changes, i.e., a species can change over time, some species may become
extinct and others appear. Mutations are the main factor responsible for
changes that occur in the species. It can be said that the mutation is the raw
material of evolution. The mutations are sudden changes of hereditary
characters, however the authors of biology treaties agree that never seen a
species give rise to another species. (COLLECTION PURPOSE, Cered,
Book 2, page 51)
[ 60 ]

A - LETHAL GENES
The French scientist Lucien Cuénot through
experiments with mice proved those mutations when they are
not harmful, are lethal, few indeed are beneficial. Among the
lethal genes are called thalassemia, microcitemia,
phenylketonuria, epiloia, and albinism. Albinism in animals and
men is not lethal, but it is deadly in plants. Phenylketonuria,
acting on the individual, produces mental retardation and death
before reaching sexual maturity. Therefore, the mutation cannot
explain the theory of evolution, on the contrary, it serves more
to confirm the biblical doctrine of human degeneration (Genesis
6:12) and all species. Mutations are a detrimental factor to life:
Either the natural mutations or induced by artificial means such as
radiation [...]. Current evidence suggests that over 99% of mutations are
undesirable. (THE NEW ZEALAND HERALD, 1/17/65)
Professor Wallace witness saying:
Changes caused by mutations, in any gene, are rare events.
This is a different way of saying those genes ordinarily reproduce accurately.
(RADIATION, GENES AND MAN, 1959, p 35)
W. H. Dowdeswell said of the changes:
The mutants discovered in the laboratory, or all of them are
recessive, or semidominant, and most cause harmful physiological effects.
(THE MECHANISM OF EVOLUTION, p 30)
[ 61 ]

Mutants with superpowers, as the heroes Marvel (X-Men) and new
species, only exist in the world of mythology and fiction. We are fans of pure
science.
Dr. HJ Muller, Nobel Prize, attested harmful and lethal
results of changes:
Most mutations are harmful and lethal; in fact, the good are so rare
that we can consider them all harmful. (TIMES, 11/11/1946, p 96)
Most evolutionists believe that the mutation is the raw
material of evolution, but it is not what it says the renowned Dr.
Dobzhansky:
Most mutations both produced in laboratories with those stored in
natural populations, produces deterioration of viability, hereditary diseases
and monstrosities. Such changes it seems, can hardly serve as an
evolutionary building stone. (GENETIC AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES,
p 73)
B - EXPERIMENTAL MUTATION
A treaty of biology so explained the experimental
mutations: “These experimental mutations have been acquired
by the action of chemicals, trauma, graft, bacteria, X-ray and
ultraviolet, cosmic rays and atomic energy" Such mutations
[ 62 ]

produced, even the highly intelligent mind of man cannot get a
satisfactory result, according concluded the expert
horticulturalist, Dr. W.E. Lammer:
My own work on radiation of roses with neutrons describes a
technique by which we can induce only irradiated buttons Queen Elizabeth,
more mutations than could be found so far for a life of research from several
million non-irradiated buttons. Without exception, all induced mutations
were found defective or weaker than the Queen Elizabeth roses [...]. Hardly
could compete biologically in view of the reduced force and partial sterility.
(THE CREACIONIST).
Mutations originated from the atomic explosion in 1945
in Japan, generated deformities, atrophy and deaths. Drug use
and other chemicals by pregnant women result in irreparable
harm in the embryo, that when not dies, is born with many
health problems; even the smoke that is accepted by society
causes mutations that are always harmful. Mutations are genetic
accidents and as always all accidents, they are harmful. The
results of such experimental mutations using chemicals witness
their misdeeds to living things: chickens without feathers,
children without arms and legs, fish with one eye, insects with
different colored eyes of its kind, birds with reduced wings.
Who would argue that such mutations worked for the evolution
of species?
C - FREQUENCY OF MUTATION
[ 63 ]

The theory of evolution cannot prove its authenticity
through experiences that can be observed, therefore, is to
imagine that evolutionists would use the time as a favorable
factor to evolution. So the argument most often used to explain
the evolution is that it took thousands and millions of years. This
is impossible today, with more reason, it was impossible in
times past. Let's see what the eminent authorities say about the
frequency of changes and the probabilities of whether it results
in new species:
Mutations occur rarely. The most genes undergo changes only
once every 100,000 or more generations [...]. Researchers estimate that the
human gene can remain stable for 2.5 million years [...]. Most mutations are
harmful. Some make it impossible for the cells to develop and grow. (WORD
BOOK ENCYCLOPEDIA, p 809 volume XIII, p 194 volume IX)
PHYLOGENY
In this chapter, we will study the theories of the origin
of life including:
- Spontaneous Generation;
- Inheritance of acquired characters;
- Natural selection;
- Mutations.
[ 64 ]

1 - THE STORY OF LIVING
The goal of phylogeny is to study the history of living
beings, however, only man left written records of their works
and achievements in the past, and on this subject we will deal in
General History of book from our collection. In fact, there are
only animals, they do not build anything for the later generation,
and even to his generation. So Jesus said, "Behold the fowls of
the air sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns, and
yet your heavenly Father feeds them" (Matthew 6:26). No
species of animal builds a civilization, a culture, their techniques
of hunting have not evolved (carnivores in thousands of years
still hunting the same way, did not develop hunting
paraphernalia), their houses have not changed (the birds
continue to do their nests, each according to its kind). Every
living still in their own habitat (fish in the water, a tree planted
on the ground, and "each jack to his" and the worm under the
earth ...).
While the bird "Rufous-clay" continues to make its
home in the same style throughout its existence, without adding
one wants compartment one more as a toilet, a kitchen, a maid's
room, or a garden in front of your mud house. More
conservative evolutionary require more rapid action of "Rufous-
clay" because it was expected that after a few millennia, he had
already to maked a little windows. And what shall we say of
men?
[ 65 ]

- Man is the absolute master of the four cardinal points:
in glaciers, it does the igloo; in the mountains, valleys and plains
there your house, are concrete houses on the rocks or wooden
stilts over the water; in the desert, he extends his tent; in the
metropolis, he raises skyscrapers. Never before has there been
living on earth like a man, a masterpiece of God's hand, created
especially to be the ruler of the planet.
What about the means of transportation? What animal
is compared to humans? The fish still swimming generation
after generation, the birds keep flying generation after
generation; quadrupeds continue generation after generation
walking. And the man? Man walks on two legs like bipedal,
subduing the horses, which are quadrupeds, men riding on his
back. He also invented and modernized the cart has drawn by
equine strength to reduce the weight of the animal and to add
more weight of people and goods, pulled by the force of horses
and company. Recently, in the history of living things, man
invented the cars driven by motors. The man does not have the
strength of ant is able to carry objects ten times heavier than its
own weight, but it can build trains capable of carrying 10,000
times its own weight. Even without being able to rely on the
convenient pneumatic bones, not with the beautiful plumes and
feathers of birds, man can fly faster than any bird. While the
birds exceed, on average, at 80 km/h; the man with his
supersonic airplanes and space shuttles; travels faster than
sound, reaching the speed of 20,000 km/h.
[ 66 ]

What else can we say? As a last example, we will cite
the case of communications. No animal has progressed creating
a new vocabulary. In fact, most of them, nor words can issue.
Some emit sounds that are far from a complex language as the
men, most of these uses the sound only in the mating parades,
like the cat. Perhaps the most intelligent creatures regarding
communication, is the CHICKEN, she always shows a great
mood by announcing that put an egg...
Evolutionists love to play the trumpet when an animal
is bred to the circus show, trying to say that in them intelligence.
Teaching a new word to the parrot just proves how much he is
automatic and it is unable to maintain, under any circumstances,
intelligent communication as man.
Indeed biologists are presenting a great job in research
on the behavior of animals, and would not, in any way belittle
the work of these professionals. However, it is in this field that
proliferates weeds evolutionists in which phylogeny becomes
the latest attempt to create a mythological story of living
beings through the fantasy lives of prehistoric men.
[ 67 ]

"Mere assumptions were unfounded the basis of this imaginary
story."
The variety of the species did not come from evolution, because
many of these birds live side by side. Nature was not selective, because God
created an integrated ecosystem with all species.
2 - SPONTANEOUS GENERATION
In the Middle Ages, spread abroad the possibility of
spontaneous generation that purported could arise living beings
of any inanimate materials such as garbage, dirt and mud. There
were "experts" that said frogs and mice and other animals could
arise wood, straw and air. Imagine that even in modern times, in
the eighteenth century, a doctor of Belgium arrived to give a
[ 68 ]

recipe to produce mice in 21 days using a dirty shirt and
spreading wheat germ.
The Theory of Spontaneous Generation began to
crumble when the biologist and Italian physician Francesco
Redi, in 1668 proved by experience that spontaneous generation
did not occur in fact. The experiment was to take two pieces of
meat by placing a piece in an open bottle and the other he
repaired it. After a while, he can observe the emergence of
larvae in the open bottle, also noted constant presence of flies
who observed the growth of larvae. At the end of the
experiment, it was observed that the larvae become like fly the
flying around the open bottle. Ended that there was never
emergence of living beings from inanimate matter, but due to
the deposit of eggs and larvae of insects.
When science class had already discarded the theory of
spontaneous generation, John Needhan in 1745 in England,
raised discussions on this subject with their new experiences,
this time, the improvement of the microscope enabled the
discovery of small living organisms, were protozoa as unable to
explain the origin of these tiny beings, appealed again to the
theory of spontaneous generation, as John Needhan had put
broth in various bottles, some open and others closed at the end
of a few days, all bottles were with microorganisms.
For over a century, this theory was widely accepted
until the French scientist Pasteur prove the falsity of this theory.
In 1864, the Academy of Sciences in Paris, Pasteur disproved
[ 69 ]

spontaneous generation, he claimed that life comes from life,
agreeing to a great truth taught in the Bible that says, "For with
thee is the fountain of all life (Psalm 36.9)."
Yes, all life comes from another life and all living
things originate from God, the fountain of life. Pasteur proved
that microbes that existed on the water were always from
another, by mechanism of reproduction. The confirmation was
achieved when the broth was first sterilized, sealed and isolating
the air. A whole year has passed and when they opened the
bottle in front of several scientists has noted that there did not
exist microorganisms.
In honor of Pasteur, the sterilization process was called
PASTEURIZATION. Thus, the idea of life have provided the
inanimate matter was deeply shaken, and the theory of
spontaneous generation was discarded.
In fact the theory of evolution is a building without a
foundation and without columns, so she does not deserve
credibility of smart people. The Superinteressante Brazilian
magazine brought an article titled: “Man is born”, it read this
statement that fits well with the ridiculous situation of
SPONTANEOUS GENERATION:
In this endless search for origins, each new finding, however,
seems to increase the area of controversy among experts. Just a fossil is
dug or more a genetic laboratory experience, to mess with the building of
hypotheses about the evolution of the human race.
[ 70 ]

(SUPERINTERESSANTE Magazine, September 1988, p
46)
Bottle covered and uncovered with decaying flesh. The worms in
the flesh come from eggs laid by flies. When the seal prevents entry of flies,
worms do not appear.
3 - HERITAGE CHARACTER PURCHASED
The first who tried to explain the theory of evolution of
species was Jean Lamarck. His theory was based on the changes
that species suffer due to the environment. The first base their
arguments was the LAW USE AND DISUSE. For the more we
use a part of the body, the more it develops and the parts that are
not used, end up atrophying. Based on this law, Lamarck
believed that new physical characteristics were transmitted
hereditarily to the next generation. Lamarck well explained its
THEORY OF HERITAGE CHARACTER ACQUIRED:
[ 71 ]

A - NECK OF THE GIRAFFE
According to Lamarck, the neck length of this animal
originated by the ongoing effort to stretch to reach food in the
upper branches of trees.
B - CACTUS
According to Lamarck, plant suffered the same process
and acquired the hereditary characteristics. The cactus and other
plants of desert climate began to have the current aspect of the
need to store water and have acquired this characteristic as the
region was drier.
C – THE SNAKES
Also according to Lamarck, long ago, snakes had short
legs, but due to the change in the environment, she started to
crawl rather than walk.
D - THE FALSEHOOD OF LAMARCK THEORY
The Lamarck's theory began to unravel when practiced
an experience as reported at the 18th lesson of Biology of the
Brazilian Universal Institute:
There was an experiment with mice, in which they cut the tail of
these animals and crossing them later. The descendants were born with tails
that were soon cut. Were crossed and again the offspring were born with tails.
This was done until the 20 generations. Individuals of the twenty first
generations still had the same tails of the first generation. (BRAZILIAN
UNIVERSAL INSTITUTE, 18th Biology lesson)
[ 72 ]

How were scientifically proven in 20 generations, the
new features inflicted in mice were not transmitted hereditarily,
thus proving the impossibility of the evolution of new species.
De Beer commented on the impact of the failure of Lamarck's
theory:
No one would have thought of doubt that, by the end of the
nineteenth century, the number of men, before the nineteenth century that
rejected the inheritance of acquired characteristics could be counted on the
fingers of one hand. (CHARLES DARWIN, p 163)
In 1996 was published a retrospective of the scientific
community, and explained why Lamarck's theory was wrong:
The acquired characters are not inherited as environmental
factors (which may not affect the genes in the sex cells) cannot influence the
next generation. (COMPENDIUM RETROSPECTIVE OF BIOLOGY 1996:
304 and 305)
Let us also a more detailed explanation of the
impossibility of evolution of Lamarck in the geneticist HJ
Muller, Nobel Prize winner, explains:
Despite the influence of the environment on the body modification
as a whole, and even their plasma cells, the genes in the germ cells of the
body retains its original structure without specific changes caused by the
body modification, so that when the individual reproduces, transmits its
progeny, genes not affected by its own acquired characters.
(ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA, volume 22, p 988)
Even the Communists rejected Lamarck's ideas, as
reported the "Times" magazine, commenting on the following
reasons:
[ 73 ]

Heredity is controlled by genes in reproductive cells and remains
unchanged during the life of the individual. (Times, 12/02/1965)
According to Lamarck, forced to eat leaves and buds on the trees,
the giraffe is forced continually to stretch up. This habit kept for long periods
and by all individuals of the race resulted in the neck stretching.
Teething horse
[ 74 ]

Teething cow
The horse has superior incisors; the cow does not have them. Both
the horse and the cow feed the same food and exist side by side. There is no
sense in the event of a have evolved with superior incisors and another not.
The environment does not influence the genotypes of living beings. Lamarck
was wrong.
4 - NATURAL SELECTION
Darwin who lived in the nineteenth century
revolutionized the world with his theory of evolution. In 1859 he
published in his book "The Origin of Species" his explanation of
the evolution of the process called "Natural Selection". Here are
the mains points of the theory:
A - In a given environment, individuals endowed with
favorable variations will be better able to survive than those with
unfavorable variations. Thus, favorable variations are
[ 75 ]

transmitted to offspring and, accumulating over time, give rise
to big differences.
B - The process of natural selection imposed by the
environment, and continued for several generations produces
more and more perfect and complex adaptations, determining
thus a progressive process.
Natural selection also leaves much to be desired
because it does not explain the fact that animals of all sizes and
as varied coexist in the same biome without the disappearance of
the weakest. The ecosystem explains how a living being depends
on others. If evolution were true, there would be serious
disturbances in the ecosystem. It is concluded that the ecosystem
pleads in favor of belief in creation and not evolution.
In fact, the findings of Darwin do not seem to be
reasonable. Consider:
On one of his trips by South America, Darwin came to the
archipelago of the Galapagos Islands, noting that there should have been a
selection in nature, because in some islands only larger turtles appear to
have survived, and in others only the smallest. This variation in
individuals of the same species is used as the basis for his theory, according
to which new species are produced by Natural Selection (Brazilian Universal
Institute, lesson 18, page 4).
The fact that large turtles live on an island and small
turtles in another, this is evidence for the theory of evolution?
No wonder that JD Thomas rebukes evolutionary scientism
saying:
[ 76 ]

There is a demonstrable scientific law, but only an interpretation of
certain fact and therefore is only a belief on the part of those who sustains it.
(FACTS AND FAITH, 1965, p 142)
Even embarrassing is the inquisition of Dr. Mellersh
that says:
According to Darwinian theory, can sustain the interviewer, any
change must be with IMMEDIATE value for its owner to give you a better
chance of survival than their peers. What good is an eye still in training, or
forelimbs shaking up weakly, waiting for wings? (THE STORY OF LIFE,
1958, p 237 and 242)
Natural selection is so irrational, so aimless...
Commenting on natural selection, the editors of the 18th lesson
of the IUB said:
(Darwin) did not find a scientific explanation to the origin of the
variability of organisms. (Brazilian Universal Institute)
[ 77 ]

LEAVES TYPES
God created the leaves of plants as wanted, in countries with high
biodiversity, all varieties coexist side by side, there is no natural selection
determines the appearance of new species.
5 - MUTATION
The theory of evolution could not be sustained, nor
with the theory of Spontaneous Generation, nor with the theory
of characters Acquired, nor with Natural Selection. With De
Vries came the fourth hypothesis, the mutation. By changing
both the explanations of the phenomenon of evolution, JD
Thomas rightly qualifies the theory of evolution as a
philosophical, not scientific study.
[ 78 ]

Evolution is an interpretation that has not been proven: So it's just
a belief based on philosophical conclusions, rather than scientific facts.
(FACTS AND FAITH, page 139)
The Dutch biologist De Vries concluded that the
mutation was the process of evolution, based on experiments
with Oenothera Lamarckian plant. In the cultivation of this
plant, he realized that appeared suddenly different
characteristics, which were named MUTATION.
In the 18th lesson, page 10, of the Brazilian Universal
Institute is argued that:
"Some authors deny the evolutionary role of mutations, stating
that the most favorable mutations emerged already and was fixed over time,
and because of this, new mutations that appear now are generally
deleterious (harmful to health) to the body."
As we see, evolutionists cannot get to a philosophical
consensus, let alone prove their claims with scientific facts.
Mutations are not evolutionary factors, but
degenerative and harmful. The DOWN SYNDROME is the
result of a genetic mutation, the main symptoms of this mutation
are: Intellectual Quotient 15 to 29, continuous transverse crease
in the palm of the hand, a single crease on the little finger,
inflammation of the eyelids.
Typically, humans have 46 chromosomes in their cells, which
come in 23 pairs. Children suffering from Down's syndrome have 47
chromosomes, because they have three copies of chromosome 21 instead of
two. What this extra copy of chromosome cause the body varies according to
[ 79 ]

the length of the copy, of the gene family of the child, as well as
environmental factors and other probabilities.
(Http://www.minhavida.com.br/saude/temas/sindrome-de-down, accessed
31/12/2014)
De Beer says the following:
Many of the mutations had fatal results and killed the
organisms that had [...]. And instead of passing improvements in
adaptation, the changes seemed to be pathological, and offered no
explanation of how they came about and how the adjustments were
improved. The result was that during the first 20 years of the twentieth
century, studies and theories of evolution were in a state of confusion.
(CHARLES DARWIN, p 182)
Mutations are genetic accidents in almost all cases are
harmful. To date, the theory of evolution did not get the
[ 80 ]

endorsement of science. The Biology Retrospective
Compendium shows how fragile evolutionary theories:
Since the theory of Lamarck (Acquired Characters) has been
proven false, it is only of historical interest. Darwin's theory (Natural
Selection) not satisfactorily explain the origin and the inheritance of
variations... The De Vries theory (Major Mutation) was shown weak.
(REVIEW TEXT IN BIOLOGY, p 363)
MUTATION PHOTO
Here's what the mutation can do. The mutation is an evolutionary
or regressive factor?
[ 81 ]

SCHOOL CURRICULUM FORCES THE TEACHING OF
EVOLUTION, CREATIONISTS PROTEST.
Regardless of the facts that testify to the creationism, teachers
continue ONLY teaching evolution. Educational policies and teaching
guidelines require teachers to follow the official curriculum that rule out the
possibility of creation as an explanation of the universe and of life on Earth.
[ 82 ]

The different animal breeds of the same species are explained by
the creative ability of God in his creationist work and full of diversity. Sheep
with and without horns live in the same environment; we do not fantasize a
mythological reason of an evolution of the species.
[ 83 ]

GIRAFFE AND SHEEP
French scientists ask, can coexist side by side, two cousins, each
fitter than the other? Does survived because his neck is longer? And the other
because your neck is shorter?
6 - THE STAGES OF EVOLUTION
The scientific authorities disagree on almost every
point of the theory of evolution. Let's see what experts say about
each step:
THE ORIGIN OF LIFE
[ 84 ]

"At least ¾ of the book of the Ages recorded in Earth's
crust are blank pages." (The world in which we live)
CELL ORGANISMS
"The fossil record still clueless of the preliminary
stages of development of cellular organisms." (Red Giants and
White Dwarfs)
VEGETABLES
"Many botanists look at the fossil record as a source of
information. But... there is not much help in discoveries... There
is not evidence of ancestor." (The Natural History of Palm
Trees)
INSECTS
"The fossil record does not give any information on the
origin of insects." (Encyclopedia Britannica)
VERTEBRATES
"The fossil remains, in any case, does not give
information on the origin of vertebrates." (Encyclopaedia
Britannica)
FISH
"We do not know LINK that connect this new animal
with previous form of life." (Wonders and Mysteries of the
Animal World)
[ 85 ]

FISH TO AMPHIBIANS
"Exactly how or why they evolved so, probably never
know." (Fish)
OF THE AMPHIBIANS REPTILES
"One of the frustrations of the fossil record of the
history of vertebrates in this small sample of the evolution of
reptiles." (The Reptiles)
REPTILES OF THE BIRDS
"The transition from reptiles to birds is the weakest in
documentation." (Processes of Organic Evolution)
MONKEYS
"Modern apes, for a moment, seem to appear suddenly.
They do not have a past in the fossil record. "(Science Digest)
THE MONKEY TO MAN
"There are no fossils or other physical evidence clearly
linking the man with the monkey." (Science Digest)
7 - BIPEDALISM
[ 86 ]

The theory of evolution seeks to support their beliefs
sabotaging all biological sciences, but Paleontology is the most
requested. Evolutionary ideas 'bipedalism' is another of the
Machiavellian theories that will not take science to progress at
all. The bipedalism is the characteristic of the human species
which allows them to move about with just the two lower limbs.
This uniqueness of man compared to primates who need the
arms to walk and the habit of the latter to live in trees
distinguishes man from primates. The explanations began to
appear...
A - HANDLING TOOLS
Scientists unbiased admit they do not know the reason
that would primates to stop walking four. Another theory was
accepted for a long time, this is the theory of handling utensils,
which stated that when primates began to hold the objects
needed to take the upper members soil. However new
contradictions arose because, chronologically, the manufacture
of tools appeared only two million years after the man walk
upright.
B - FOOD TRUCKS
Another theory tried to explain why man stopped
walking four, this was called 'theory of food transport. It thought
that while the monkey mother took care of the puppies, the
monkey father went to the forest for food, and to bring food, he
[ 87 ]

walked upright; but fossil findings showed that this assumption
was more fictitious than scientific.
C - INSOLATION
This theory originated in the 1980s, by Professor of
Liverpool, England, Peter Wheeler. According to Wheeler,
walking four, the body became more exposed to the heat of the
sun and standing, the exposed area would be lower. Wheeler
himself said: "Stand up is the ideal way to keep the cold walks
unmanned Ecuadorian landscape."
However, this theory has its objections. First: Why
prehistoric men in cold regions, and less hot also wanted to
stand? Second, almost all species have a physiological cooling
system that keeps the blood temperature in a bearable level, so it
is unnecessary to remain standing for the blood to circulate
normally. Third: Why also other animals also sought not stand?
- No answer! Because God has created man upright!!!
THE TIME
On the day your child was born, you did not forget. It is
not true? Also parents keep in memory the age at which your
child started walking. However, evolutionists who created the
'homo-erectus', do not know when your 'little boy' started
walking! The journalist and scholar of evolution Boycer
Rensberger says, "When exactly the man started to walk on
two legs? This is an unanswered question."
[ 88 ]

Such fossils show that in the primitive world there is
evidence of complete and complex life, not a simple world with
life forms in transition. The large dinosaurs of old indicate
complex forms of life, which is more reasonable with creation
than evolution. There were dinosaurs with eight hearts in a
special system to pump blood to the top of the head!!!!
XI - BIOGEOGRAPHY
The Biogeography studies the reasons why the animals
distribute themselves in this way on the planet. Evolutionists
also use this science to find evidence for evolution. They say
ADAPTATION factor would also be one mechanism of
evolution. Now try to explain the evolution with adaptation, is
the same sign of desperation because he could not explain
evolution. Simpson said that:
Know that evolution has occurred is one thing, and explain how
and why happened is something very different. The HOW and WHY are
precisely the issues of concern and call the attention of the whole world wise.
(THE MEANING OF EVOLUTION, Yale University Press, p 11)
1 - ADAPTATION
According to evolutionists, when animals move to other
regions, little by little, they are undergoing changes which are
contributing factors of evolution. As we read this statement, we
[ 89 ]

realize that these distinguished scientists confuse adaptation
with evolution. Here are some animals that were used for
example to say that geographic factors influenced the evolution
of species:
BEAR
The polar bear has evolved from the brown bear,
adapting to the cold climate to survive? No way! What happens
is adaptation and not evolution. Polar bears captured and bred
in captivity in warm regions, show perfect fit. Simply, the
pigments of your hair has turned white and have adapted to the
climate; like the Europeans are bright, blond hair and blue eyes,
adapting to the cold weather; Africans are human identical to the
Europeans, only adapting to the climate with dark pigments in
the skin, curly hair and black eyes to absorb less light.
FLY
The adaptation that certain flies demonstrated to
withstand the effects of insecticide generated more confidence in
the theory of evolution. However, what was proved was that
there was more resistant flies to a type of venom than others,
and this resilience is hereditary, and that there is no evidence for
the theory of evolution. In addition, these adaptable flies did not
evolve into another species, flies remained until this day. This
fact alone proves that some individuals are more adaptable than
others. The largest and the least adaptive capacity also occur
[ 90 ]

with men. We have seen many originated northeastern dry
climate of Brazil to go to the southeast, cooler weather, they
cannot adapt and be constantly sick. They are usually
recommended by doctors to return to their land. However, others
show high adaptability in any climate and other variables, such
as different food, working hours, socioeconomic factors, etc...
An abandoned car cutting up, as inanimate matter tends to decline,
not progressing.
The disintegration time is not a factor of evolution. Water hitting
the rock erodes, the effect is destructive and not constructive or evolutionary.
[ 91 ]

MOTHS
Evolutionists use the argument of the color change of a
species of butterfly, the last 100 years, whose light color that
was in abundance decreased compared with another of the same
kind of dark color, which increased the number. Evolutionists
sought to explain that this change occurred because the dark
color survived better to the industrial age, because the pollution
darkened the tree trunks with soot, served to camouflage the
dark moths; have a light color has become easy victim of birds,
causing the number of moths clear decrease the amount of this
butterfly. What we see here is a case of variety within the same
species, which in certain circumstances favored certain
individual over another, there was no evolution of species.
WOODPECKER
An attempt to prove the theory of evolution using as an
example the woodpecker:
The woodpecker has two toes on each foot, driven back, that
enable to have a firm foothold in the bark of trees, have stiff tail feathers
which serve as insurance support, a long beak robust with sticking bark, and
a lot of long tongue that reaches out and takes the larvae inside the holes [...].
These adaptations may have arisen during the evolution of the
woodpecker. (CHARLES DARWIN)
Liviaferreira92@icloud.com
We are obliged to disagree with this argument, because
what need is there of evolution to survive? And why the other
[ 92 ]

short beak of birds and short language did not evolve, and yet
survive? And what did the woodpecker to survive before getting
these features it has today? In fact, the woodpecker has these
characteristics because God has made it so. In the same biome,
there may be thousands of species, living in harmony, no need
for evolution because they have been created with its own
characteristics.
SPARROW
Evolutionists take hold of biogeographical science to
defend the evolution Sparrow:
The English sparrow introduced from Europe in the United States
changed perceptively in their new home; the average size birds increased and
were different breeds in incipient local. (GENETIC AND THE ORIGIN OF
SPECIES, p 96)
The fact Sparrow increase in size does not prove
anything about evolution, but only confirms that living things
have the potential to adapt to the environment without ever
evolve into a new species. Often, eating habits and the climate
forcing the body to adjustments that are perfectly framed in the
Creator's plan and programmed within the DNA of each species.
Studies show that the stature of men has increased between the
late twentieth century and early twenty-first, possibly due to
food intake which animals were fed for generations, with growth
hormones. This is not evolution. Evolutionists want to see
[ 93 ]

evidence every change, however, such changes are, usually,
transitional or even harmful, such as cancer.
The muscular system is a complex network of wires, cannot be the
product of chance, but of an Intelligent Designer, someone designed and
surgically traced the fibers, then inserted a program recopy the DNA, ‘each
according to its kind.’
HORSE
You often read statements of evolutionists claiming that
the feeding habits favored the survival of certain species over
others, including developing the jaw and changing the skull
[ 94 ]

bone structure (this argument is used with respect to
Australopithecus). However, what to conclude about the horse
and cow? They are mammals that live side by side and feed on
the same grass? Why, then, the horse has upper incisors; and the
cow has not? Why an evolve with incisors and another not?
XII - SYSTEMATIC
1 - THE KINGDOMS
The old textbooks classified in the kingdoms: Mineral,
Vegetable and Animal. Today (2014) are considered five
kingdoms. Of course, the man is ranked in the animal kingdom.
However, for us, fundamentalist Christians, human beings, are
of particular origin, as created in the image and likeness of God
should be classified as a kingdom over.
A - MINERAL KINGDOM
Composed of all inanimate materials such as rocks,
precious stones, and sand. In Genesis 1:10, is cited as the "dry
land" earth created.
B - VEGETABLE
According to the Scriptures, after God created the
mineral kingdom, he established the second kingdom, the
[ 95 ]

vegetables. In Genesis 1:12, the kingdom is represented by all
species of plants, flowers, herbs and trees.
C - ANIMAL KINGDOM
If God first created the animals, how they would feed
without vegetables? See how God is wise, He is the Father of
the ecosystem and thus created the first plant, and only later the
animals. Read Genesis 1.20-21.
D – HUMAN KINGDOM
Scientists wicked classified men as animals, however,
certain peculiarities of human require them to be reclassified,
distinguishing it from all animals. Based on Genesis chapter
one, we see man being created separate from animals in verse
26. With the making of the man, closes the work of creation.
Thus, since ancient times, no new species was created or came
another as a result of evolution.
2 - MAN'S CLASSIFICATION
Unfortunately our young people are forced to listen to
their teachers say: “we are improved animals.” Therefore, man
is so classified;
KINGDOM - Animal
FILO - chordata
[ 96 ]

CLASS - mammalia
ORDER - primate
FAMILY - hominid
GENDER - Homo
KIND - Homo sapiens
All races descended from the first man and the first woman. Some
developed, based on accumulated knowledge. Other progressed for a time,
and then regressed. Other finally became extinct. (From the book: Did Man
Get Here by Evolution or by Creation?)
3 - FAMILY
[ 97 ]

BIOLOGY - THE MYTH OF EVOLUTION

BIOLOGY - THE MYTH OF EVOLUTION

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to BIOLOGY - THE MYTH OF EVOLUTION

Similar to BIOLOGY - THE MYTH OF EVOLUTION (20)

More from ESCRIBAVALDEMIR

More from ESCRIBAVALDEMIR (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

BIOLOGY - THE MYTH OF EVOLUTION