Dhanasekaran - Copy

ii
A STUDY ON EMPLOYEES GRIEVANCE HANDLING PROCEDURES IN CAMBODIA
MILLS LTD, COIMBATORE
PROJECT REPORT
Submitted by
M.DHANASEKARAN
Register. No. 13MBAB05
Under the Guidance of
Prof Dr.R.VENKATAPATHY
DIRECTOR, BSMED
In Partial fulfillment for the award of degree in
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
BHARATHIAR SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT AND
ENTREPRENEUR DEVELOPMENT BHARATHIAR
UNIVERSITY COIMBATORE-46
October 2014

ii
BHARATHIAR SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT AND ENTREPRENEUR
DEVELOPMENT
BHARATHIAR UNIVERSITY
COIMBATORE-641046
PROJECT REPORT CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the project entitled
A STUDY ON EMPLOYEES GRIEVANCE HANDLING PROCEDURES IN CANBODIA
MILLS, LIMITED
Submitted to
Bharathiar University
In partial fulfillment for the degree of
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Is a bonafide record of the project work carried out by
M. DHANASEKARAN
(Reg.No:13MBAB05)
………………………………………… ..........……………………………
Prof.R.Venkatapathy Prof.R.Venkatapathy
Faculty Guide Director
Submitted for Viva-Voce Examination held on
……………………………………………….......
...............................…………… ………………………………
Internal Examiner External Exami

1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and for most I would like to give my whole hearted and sincere to the almighty
God for helping me throughout the project.
I hereby acknowledge my sincere gratitude to my Department of Management
Studies, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore for giving me an opportunity to undergo MBA
Degree Course and to undertake this project work successfully.
My proud full thanks to our honorable Vice Chancellor Dr. James Pitchai, Bharathiar
University, Coimbatore, for the moral support and the generous infrastructural espousal done
to me for the research.
I am highly grateful to my guide Prof.R.Venkatapathy, Director, BSMED, without
whose support the project would not have been completed.
I owe my reverential gratitude to Mr.D.JEEVA Assistant HR manager, for
providing me a wonderful opportunity to do my project in their esteemed organization.
I wish to express my deep sense of gratitude to other staff members in the
Department, Bharathiar School of Management and Entrepreneur Development for their
valuable suggestions and encouragement during the project.
Last, but not least, I would like to acknowledge my whole hearted support of my
parents, faculties, Research scholars of BSMED and friends who helped meat various stage
sin completing this work successfully.
M.Dhanasekaran

2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The title of the Project “A study on Employee grievance and handling procedure”
done in Cambodia mills ltd, Coimbatore.
The study aims to know the Employee grievance and the handling procedure. It
helps in identifying how the employees are engaging themselves in their job to the full
involvement. The main objective of the study was specifically on grievance handling
procedures among the employees to Cambodia mill, Coimbatore
The type of Research used in this study is descriptive research. The sources of the
data for the study were primary data. The self prepared questionnaire was used to find the
personal data of respondents and the grievance procedure involved in the organization. The
study was conducted among 150 employees.
Various analytical tools like ANOVA and z-test were to know the grievance of the
employees and also assisted in identifying the needs of the employees to improve the
handling procedure of the Employee, and appropriate suggestions are given.

3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER NO TITLE PAGE NO
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION OF THE STUDY 1
1.2 NEED FOR THE STUDY 6
1.3 SCOPE OF THE STUDY 7
1.4 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY 7
1.5 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY 7
1.6 ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILE 8
1.7 COMPANY PROFILE 10
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 12
CHAPTER
III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 14
3.2 RESEARCH DESIGN 14
3.3 SAMPLING DESIGN 14
3.4 SAMPLING TECHNIQUE 15

4
3.5 TOOLS OF DATA COLLECTION 15
3.6 SOURCES OF DATA 15
3.7 STATISTICAL TOOL 15
CHAPTER IV
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPERTATION
4.1 PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS 16
4.2 ONE WAY ANOVA TEST 56
4.3 Z TEST 59
CHAPTER V
FINDINGS,SUGGESTION AND CONCLUSION
5.1 FINDINGS 61
5.2 SUGGESTIONS 63
5.3 CONCLUSIONS 63
BIBLIOGRAPHY 64
APPENDIX
65

5
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO TITLE PAGE NO
4.1.1 DISTRIBUTION OF THE RESPONDENTS BY THEIR AGE 16
4.1.2 DISTRIBUTION OF THE RESPONDENTS BY THEIR GENDER 18
4.1.3 DISTRIBUTION OF THE RESPONDENTS BY THEIR MARITAL STATUS 20
4.1.4 QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS 22
4.1.5 DISTRIBUTION OF THE RESPONDENTS BY THEIR MONTHLY INCOME 24
4.1.6 DISTRIBUTION OF THE RESPONDENTS BY THEIR EXPERIENCE IN THE
PRESENT JOB
26
4.1.7 DISTRIBUTION OF THE RESPONDENTS BY THEIR DEPARTMENT 28
4.1.8 RESPONDENTS’ OPINION ABOUT THE FIXATION OF WAGES 30
4.1.9 RESPONDENT’S OPINION TOWARDS THE ALLOTMENT OF OVERTIME
32
4.1.10
RESPONDENT’S OPINION ON THE INCENTIVES SCHEMES FOLLOWED
BY THE ORGANIZATION
34
4.1.11
RESPONDENT’S OPINION ON THE PROVISION OF ALLOWANCE AND
WORKING HOURS
36
4.1.12 RESPONDENT’SOPINION TOWARDSTHEWORKPLACEANDWORKING
CONDITION
38

6
4.1.13 RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT SIMPLIFY IN THE WORK PLACE 40
4.1.14
RESPONDENTS’ OPINION TOWARD THE LEVEL OF SAFETY TOWARDS
HANDLING EQUIPMENTS
42
4.1.15 RESPONDENT’S OPINION TOWARDS THE HANDLING OF DEFECTIVE
TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT
44
4.1.16
RESPONDENT’S OPINION TOWARDS SUPERVISOR FOLLOWING
FAVORITISM
46
4.1.17
OPINION OF THE RESPONDENTS ABOUT THE GRIEVANCES IN
CONTINUITY OF THEIR SERVICE
48
4.1.18 RESPONDENT’S OPINION TOWARD THE DISCIPLINARY RULES 50
4.1.19 RESPONDENT’S OPINION TOWARD GETTING APPROPRIATE LEAVES 52
4.1.20 RESPONDENT’S OPINION TOWARDS SATISFACTION ON MEDICAL
FACILITIES
54
4.2.1
ANOVA BASED ON AGE AND OVERTIME ALLOTTED
56
4.2.2 ANOVA BASED ON EXPERIENCE AND HANDLING EQUIPMENT 57
4.2.3 ANOVA BASED ON INCOME AND ALLOWANCE 58
4.3.1 Z TEST BASED ON GENDER AND ECONOMIC 59
4.3.2 Z TEST BASED ON GENDER AND WORKGROUP 59
4.3.3 Z TEST BASED ON GENDER AND WORK ENVIRONMENT 60

7
LIST OF CHART
CHART
NO
TITLE PAGE NO
4.1.1 DISTRIBUTION OF THE RESPONDENTS BY THEIR AGE 17
4.1.2 DISTRIBUTION OF THE RESPONDENTS BY THEIR GENDER 19
4.1.3
DISTRIBUTION OF THE RESPONDENTS BY THEIR MARITAL STATUS 21
4.1.4 QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS 23
4.1.5 DISTRIBUTION OF THE RESPONDENTS BY THEIR MONTHLY INCOME 25
4.1.6 DISTRIBUTION OF THE RESPONDENTS BY THEIR EXPERIENCE IN THE
PRESENT JOB
27
4.1.7 DISTRIBUTION OF THE RESPONDENTS BY THEIR DEPARTMENT 29
4.1.8 RESPONDENTS’ OPINION ABOUT THE FIXATION OF WAGES 31
4.1.9 RESPONDENT’SOPINION TOWARDSTHE ALLOTMENT OF OVERTIME 33
4.1.10
RESPONDENT’SOPINION ON THE INCENTIVES SCHEMES FOLLOWED
BY THE ORGANIZATION
35
4.1.11
RESPONDENT’SOPINION ON THE PROVISION OF ALLOWANCE AND
WORKING HOURS
37

8
4.1.12 RESPONDENT’SOPINION TOWARDSTHEWORKPLACEANDWORKING
CONDITION
39
4.1.13 RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT SIMPLIFY IN THE WORK PLACE 41
4.1.14 RESPONDENTS’ OPINION TOWARD THE LEVEL OF SAFETY 43
4.1.15 RESPONDENT’S OPINION TOWARDS THE HANDLING OF DEFECTIVE
TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT
45
4.1.16
RESPONDENT’S OPINION TOWARDS SUPERVISOR FOLLOWING
FAVORITISM
47
4.1.17
OPINION OF THE RESPONDENTS ABOUT THE GRIEVANCES IN
CONTINUITY OF THEIR SERVICE
49
4.1.18 RESPONDENT’S OPINION TOWARD THE DISCIPLINARY RULES 51
4.1.19 RESPONDENT’S OPINION TOWARD GETTING APPROPRIATE LEAVES 53
4.1.20 RESPONDENT’S OPINION TOWARDS SATISFACTION ON MEDICAL
FACILITIES
55

9
A STUDY ON EMPLOYEES GRIEVANCE HANDLING PROCEDURES IN
CAMBODIA MILLS LTD, COIMBATORE
CHAPTERR - I
1.1 Introduction of the study
Grievance
Every employee has certain expectation, which he thinks must be fulfilled by
the organization he is working for when the organization fails to this he develop a feeling of
dissatisfaction when an employee feels something is unfair in the organization he is said to
have a grievance.
Discovery of grievances:
Grievances can be uncovered in a number of ways, Gossip and grapevine
offer vital clues about employee grievances. Gripe boxes, open door polices periodic
interviews, exit surveys could also be undertaken to uncover the mystery surrounding
grievances.
Definition of grievance handling:
“A compliant of one more workers in respect of wages, allowances, conditions
of work, interpretation
of services, stipulations covering such areas as overtime, leave, transfer, promotion,
seniority, job assignment and termination of services.”
“Prior to any formal grievance the employee most discusses the issue with
his/ her immediate supervisor within three working days after the date of occurrence. Or three
working days after the date which the affected employee(s) could reasonable been made
aware of the issue giving rise of the dispute or compliant.”
“If not resolved by the immediate supervisors within three working days the
employee(S)”may submit a grievance in writing to step 1 no later than three working days.

10
STEP 1:
A written grievance may be submitted by the grievance to the immediate
supervisor as set forth above, the employee may request a representative accompany him her
to the discussion. This will be held as soon as practicable, but not more than three working
days after the grievance. the supervisor shall provide a written answer to the employee
within three working days after the meeting If the issue is not resolved, the employee(s)
and/or Union may appeal to Step 2, within three working days,
STEP 2:
A meeting between the employee, union representative, the Department head
and the supervisor shall be upon receipt of the appeal, or within three working days thereof
The Department head shall provide a written response to the union representative within three
working days of meeting. If no settlement is reached to be timely. The union must to 3 within
five working days.
STEP 3:
A meeting between the general manager Department head human resource
Representative, the District union Representative and two (2) other Local Union officials (if a
discipline case one (1) Local union officials may grievant) shall be arranged data will be
established as soon as possible but no later than twenty (20) working days from the receipt of
the appeal expect where circumstance warrant an extension. Such extension shall not extent
for more than five (5) working to the District Union Representative no later than five (5)
working days. If the matter is not resolved the union may submit the matter to
ARBITRATION with (10) working days of receipt of management STEP 3 answer.
ARBITRATION:
Each party shall submit a list of five (5) names to the other from the ten (10)
names presented one (1) should be selected as the impartial arbitrator. If no one is acceptable,
the union shall submit three (3) names : the company shall submit two(2) names resulting in a
list of five(5) names (In subsequent cases the arrangement will be the first to eliminate one
name the other party will follow and the sequence will continue until only one name is left.
The parties agree that the sole remaining name shall be the arbitrator for this case only. The
parties agree that the decision rendered will be final and binding on all parties, I e

11
Management union, grievant and employees post hearing briefs will not field unless request
by the arbitrator, or at the request of either party.
The arbitrator‘s decision may be oral or written if written, it shall be delivered
to the parties simultaneously no then thirty (30) working days.
Grievances may occur for a number of reasons:
Economic:
Wage fixation, overtime, bonus, wage revision etc. employees may feel that they are
paid less when compared to others.
Work environment:
Poor physical conditions of workplace, tight production norms, defective tools and
equipment, poor quality of materials, unfair rules, lack of recognition, etc.
Supervision:
Relates to the attitudes of the supervisor towards the employee such as perceived
notions of bias, favoritism, nepotism, caste affiliations, regional feelings etc.
Work group:
Employee is unable to adjust with his colleagues; suffers from feelings of neglect,
victimization and becomes an object of ridicule and humiliation, etc.
Miscellaneous:
These include issues relating to certain violations in respect of promotions, safety
methods, transfer, disciplinary rules, fines, granting leave, medical facilities, etc.
Grievance Effects:
Grievances if they are not identified and redressed, May adversely affect workers,
managers and the organization as a whole. The effects are:
Grievance effects of production include:
 Low quality of production

12
 Low quantity of production and productivity.
 Increase in the wastage of material, spoilage/breakage of machinery.
 Increase in the cost of production per unit.
Grievance effects of employees:
 Increases the rate of absenteeism and turnover.
 Reduces the level of commitment, sincerity and punctuality.
 Increases the incidence of accidents.
 Reduces the level of employee morale.
Grievance effects of managers:
 Strains the superior-subordinate relations.
 Increases the degree of supervision, control and follow up.
 Increase in indiscipline cases.
 Increase in unrest and thereby machinery to maintain industrial peace.
1.1.2 The Statutory Provisions for the Grievance Handling Procedure
under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946.
The provisions are under:-
1) Any workman desirous of the redress of a grievance arising out of his employment
or relating to unfair treatment or wrongful exaction on the part of a superior shall
either himself or through a trade union of which he is member submits a complaint
to the manager in his behalf.
2) The manger or any such officer shall personally the complaint at such times &
places as may fix the workmen and,
i) Any other workmen of his choice or
ii) Where the complaint is made through a trade union a member of the
union shall have the right to be present at such investigation.
Where the complainant alleges unfair treatment or wrongful exaction on the part of
superior a copy of the order finally made by the manager shall be supplied to the compliment
if he asks for one.

13
In other cases the decision of the investigating officer & the action if any taken
thereon by the intimidated to the complainant.
Provided that complaints relating to assault or by any persons holding a supervisory
position or refusal of an application for urgent leave shall be enquired into immediately by
the manager or such other officers as he may appoint.
The decisions of the manager upon any question arising out of, or connection with, or
incident to an appeal to the proprietor expect where the manger is he the proprietor.
1.1.3 The Essential of Pre-requisites of a Grievance Handling Procedure:
Maintaining quality of work life for its employees is an important concern for the any
organization. The grievance handling procedure of the organization can affect the harmonious
environment of the organization. The grievance of the employees are related to the contract
work rule or regulation policy or procedure health and safety regulation past practice
changing the cultural norms unilaterally individual victimization wage bonus etc,,, here
attitude on the part of management in their efforts understand the problems of employees and
resolve the issues amicably have better probability to maintain a culture of high performance
managers must be educated about the importance of the grievance process and their role in
management favorable relations with the union . effective grievance handling is an essential
part of cultivating good employee relations and running a fair, successful, and productive
workplace positive labor relations are two-way street both sides must give a little and try
work together relationship building is key to successful labor relations,
Precautions and Prescriptions:
The management should take care of following aspects to develop a culture of trust
and confidence upon the employees.
 Always ensure that the managers involved in the grievance handling procedures have
a quit place to meet with the complainant.
 Always ensures that managers have adequate time to be devoted to the complainant.
 Fully explaining the situation to the employee to eliminate any misunderstanding and
promote better acceptance of the situation complained.
 Try to let employee present their issues without prejudging or commenting.

14
 Do use a positive friendly ways to resolve the crisis then punitive steps, which disturb
the system.
 Do remain calm, cool collected during the course of the meeting.
 Always focus on the subject of the grievance then allied issues.
 Don’t make threats manage the grievance
 Avoid usage of verbosisms’ like “it will be taken care of”
 Take all possible steps to ensure that no victimization occurs as or me grievance being
raised
 Try to look upon the problem on different angles for appropriate understanding
 Avoid as possible the union involvement in contact resolution situation process
 Follow documentation the procedures of all necessary steps taken to resolve the
problem complaint.
 Grievances are preferably to be settled informally at the level of the employee’s
immediate supervisor.
To a great extent the aggravation of industrial problems depends on managers approaches
and attitude in effective handling of employees grievance care should be taken in the way
managers approaches the problem and perceiving the pros and cons of the situation. The
conflict management approaches include the win-win strategy that help in the healthy
organizational practices and which reflects the strong organizational culture. The
cooperation from both parties is the pre-requisite to handle the problem and effective
settlement of the grievance conscious use of professional self can held managers in the
conflict handling situations grievance redressed process.
1.2 Need for the study:
A grievance is a sign of an employee‘s discontentment with his job or his relationship
with his colleagues grievance generally arise out of the day-to-day working relations in an
organization. An employee or trade union protects against an act or policy of the management
that they consider as violating employee’s rights.
Grievance is a situation when a dissatisfaction or trouble occurs when two or more
people or parties perceive an incompatibility in their goals or expectations. There are seven
methods for achieving reconciliation of conflict. These methods are winning-lose withdrawal
and retreat from argument, something and playing down the difference arbitration, mediation,

15
compromise and problem solving of all these methods problem solving method is most likely
to bring about win-win situation.
One of the effective ways of minimizing and eliminating the source of an employee’s
grievance is by having an ‘open door policy’ to overcome this aspect the researcher attempted
to analyses by collecting the information from the respondents in the organization.
1.3 Scope of the study:
The scope of the study is observing the existing problems in the organization and to
follow the necessary steps to overcome the grievance procedures in the organization. This
study is also conducted to find out the work pattern and behavior of the respondents. It has
been used to measure the intensity of grievance among the respondents in the organization.
1.4 Objectives of the study:
“To study specificaly on grievance handling procedures among the employees to
Cambodia mill, Coimbatore.”
 To study the socio economic status of the employee.
 To find out the need for grievance redressal procedure
 To find out the work environment and workgroup.
 To analysis the effectiveness of the grievance redressal procedures in the
organization.
 To identify the steps involved in solving grievance redressal procedures.
 To suggest measures to overcome the problems.
1.5 Limitations of Study:
1) The limitation of time for the data collection is another problem faced by
researcher.
2) The study being sensitivity in some aspects. The respondents showed natural
baseness in their responses.
3) This study covers a number of factors that related with grievance procedures but
then the importance of these factors was not found.

16
1.6 ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILE:
National Textile Corporation is a company owned by the Indian government. It owns
many textile mills, some of which have been closed down. The company was incorporation in
April 1968.
The National Textile Corporation Limited (NTC) is a central public sector Enterprise
under the ministry of Textile which was incorporation in April 1968 for managing the affairs
of sick textile undertakings in the private sector, taken over by the Government. Starting with
16 mills in 1968, this number gradually rose to 103 by 1972-73. In the year 1974 all these
units were nationalized under the sick Textile undertaking (Nationalized) Act 1974. The
number of units increased to 119 by 1995. These 119 mills were controlled by NTC Ltd with
the help of 9 Subsidiary corporations, with an authorized capital of 10 crore (US$181
million) which was raised from time to time and which is now about 7,000 crore (US$1.27
billion) and the paid up share capital of the corporation is about 4000 crore (US$ 727
million).
Looking to the reduced number of mills and in line with the contemporary industry’s
trend all 9 subsidiary companies have been merged with NTC Head office, located at New
Delhi, making it into a single company with effect from 01.04.2006.
NTC has so far closed 78 mills and has transferred 2 mills in the state of Pondicherry
to the state Government.
NTC is to modernize all its mills by itself through generation of funds from the sale of
its surplus assets and 5 mills are put in Joint venture with corporate.
NTC has put up 3 composite textile Greenfield units in Ahmadabad (Gujarat),(
Maharashtra ) and one is an SEZ area of Hassan ( Karnataka ) .
NTC has started taking initiatives to set up technical textile projects in Joint venture
with the world Leaders and is working towards it.
Textile industry occupies a very significant position in the society. Since its product
homely cloths in an indispensable need in the day to day life of every individual. Textile
industry is in existence from time immemorial.

17
Cotton industry developed from hand working to factories powered by water and steam
between 1750 and 1820. By the 19th century, most cotton manufactures moved away from a
cottage industry to large, noisy factories. The changes were brought about by the invention of
new machinery which greatly speeded up the cotton production process. The use of modern
technology such as atomic high speed shuttle lees Looms ring spinning in replacement of
handlooms weaving and spinning achieved large scale production and hence proved top more
cost effective .
The textile industry is one of the largest employers of Labour. The industries includes
the spinning , weaving , knitting , and finishing of all types of natural fibers such as
polyamides and polyesters are often now used in conjunction with cotton for many purpose.
In Tamil Nadu , there are about 1607 small sized textile mills employing less than
100 workers , 244 medium scale mills employing and large sized mills employing more than
500 workers , Textile industry in Tamil Nadu plays a significant role of the industry growth
by many of its contribution is enhancing productivity as well as providing large employment.
1.6.1 Mission & Vision:
Vision:
To be a world class Eco-friendly integrated Textile Company, catering primarily to the
clothing needs of the nation.
Mission:
To be a leading Textile Enterprise steadily improving capacity utilization, Economy of
operations, productivity, Quality Brand Images, market share and Export.

18
1.7 COMPANY PROFILE:
Name and Address of the Company : Cambodia Mills (NTC)
P.O.Box no: 3504
Ondipudur post
Coimbatore
Email : Cambodia@vsnl.net
Telephone : 0422 2273088
Administration : National Textile Corporation
(Head office)
Tamil Nadu
A Government of India
Registrar Office : NTC House
P .o. ne 2409
35-B Somasundharam Mill Road
Coimbatore
Establishment of the Business : 1924
Nationalization : 1-4-1974
No of workers : 638 workers, 40 staffs
Product : yarn

19
1.7.1 Processfollowedin Manufacturing Product profile:
CHAPTERR
Spinning process
Raw cotton
Mixing
Below room
Carding (silver)
Combing (silver)
Drawing (silver)
Simplex (bobbin)
Ring spinning
Cone winding

20
CHAPTERR II
REVIEW OF LITURATURE
Liebenberg, (1984) research indicates that the factors that contribute to the adoption
of dispute resolution mechanisms include the structure of the mechanisms. The role of the
union steward (Dalton and tower, 1982) the applicable rights of the employees and the
mandate and the relationship and the employee (Meyer and Cooke, 1988).
In a naturally occurring field experiment in which an intervention to improve a
grievance procedure was introduced and the removed, Mesch&Dalton (1922) found that the
interrupted time series experimental design resulted in more compromise resolution and a
dramatic increase in the number of grievance field. The enhancement of fairness perceptions
takes place both through instrumental and non-instrumental mechanisms.
Hellman (1993) perhaps brings out the dichotomy succinctly. When he suggests that
agreement is not necessarily good but the neither is disagreement especially when people
disagree for the sake of disagreeing as a way to assert themselves and to avoid feeling
dominated. In the Indian context disputes under the industrial disputes Act 1947 a dispute is
raised when an employment contract is not carried out. The issues could include wage
demands union rivalry political interference unfair labor practices as described in the fifth
schedule of the ID Act consists of conciliation Arbitration and Adjudication Apart from this
in line with the theories of industrial jurisprudence, in the unionized context there are
collective bargaining establishment of works committee discipline management and
grievance resolution procedure Which help prevent disputes in the first place.
Perception of fair procedures have instrumental value if they lead to fair rewards
while the non instrumental value connotes a since of treating employees with respect
Neumann et al., (1995). Studies indicate that grievant interest in using voice simply for the
non instrumental sake of being heard or socially valued rather than to actually influences
outcomes. Seems to increase when they perceive that three are less opportunity to influence
outcomes (Barry 2000). This implies that if they wish grievant to derive non instrumental
satisfaction with an appeals process. Listeners to grievances would need to demonstrate
convincingly that instrumental action on behalf of the grievant is truly unavailable Moreover;
unfavorable outcomes that are reached by fair process generate higher distributive justice
ratings than favorable outcomes reached by unfair processes (Blanker 1995).

21
Despite the contention that formation of labor unions is necessary for the survival of the
workers (Vickery, 1990) and the concern that workers have a reduced capacity to initiate
issues and articulate grievances in the non unionized workplaces (Kaufman and tares 1999)
and they enjoy less benefits three seems to be a link between the use of high performance
work systems and the adoption of non-union dispute resolution procedures (Colvin 2003).
The study by Bat Colvin and keeve (2002) indicated that while union presence had a negative
relationship with quit rates the prediction for non-union dispute resolution procedures was
uncertain as they may be designed to encourage or suppress employee voice. However rising
of individual contracts and union substitution by employers is leading to adoption of non-
unionized disputes resolution mechanisms at the workplace (Colvin 2003).
Conclusion:
Several articals were reviewed on grievance handling procedure. In which according to
Hellman (1993) insisted on they grievance resolution procedure that will help to prevent,
they disputes in the workplace. A proper grievance handling procdure should be adopted, so
tat the expectation of every employee working in the organization are fulfilled.

22
CHAPTERR – III
Research Methodology
3.1 Research Methodology:
“The objective and systematic method of finding solution to a problem i.e., systematic
collection, recording, analyzing, interpretation and reporting of information about facts of
phenomenon under study."
The success of research depends mostly on the methodology on which it is carried
out. The appropriate methodology will improve the validity of the findings. This chapter
discusses the methods of data collection, research design, sample plan and statistical
technique.
3.2 Research Design:
A research design is the arrangement of conditions for collection and analysis of data
in a manner that combine relevance to the research purpose with economy in procedure.
The research design used is descriptive research design. Descriptive research studies
are those which are concerned with describing the characteristic of a particular group. The
major purpose of descriptive research is description of the state of affairs as exists at present.
3.3 Sampling Design:
Sampling is used to collect primary data when the source of data is far too many
to be exhausting handled. Sampling is the integral part of data collection process. The way of
selecting a sample is known as sample design. It is the definite plan for obtaining a sample
from a given population. It may as well lay down the number of items to be included in the
sample i.e. the size of the sample.
3.3.1. Population
The overall population of the process is 638
3.3.2 Sample size
Out of 638 employees in Cambodia mill, the data has been collected from 150
employees.

23
3.3.3 Target Respondents
The target respondents for the study are employees for Cambodia mills ltd.
3.4 Sampling Technique:
Convenience sampling means group are individual that convenience available and
willing to participate the study.
Convenience sampling method was used in the present study to collect the data. From
the total of 638 employees working in National Textile Corporation with reference to
Cambodia mills ltd. Cambodia 150 respondents were selected by Convenience sampling
method.
3.5 Tools of Data Collection:
The self prepared questionnaire was used to find out the personal data of respondents
is found out the grievance procedure involved in the organization.
3.6 Sources of Data:
This piece of research depends entirely on the primary data collected for studying the
above mentioned objectives of the company.
3.6.1 Primary data:
Primary data is the first hand information that is obtained through experiment surveys,
etc. in this study the primary sources of data is obtained by issuing interview schedule to the
respondents. In interview schedule method the respondents are given questionnaire with
request to return after completing the interview schedule.
3.7 StatisticalTool:
Simple percentage analysis
Z test and
One way ANOVA have been used for the study.

24
CHAPTERR -IV
4.1 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
Table No 4.1.1
Distribution of the respondents by their age
S.no Age Frequency Percentage
1 31-40 7 4.7
2 41-50 143 95.3
3 Total 150 100.0
(Source: primary Data)
INFERENCE
From the above table inferred that the majorities 96 percentages of the respondents
are in the age between 41 and 50 years and 4 percentages of the respondents are in the age
from 31-40 years.
It is found that majority 96percentages of the respondents are in the age from 41-50
years in Cambodia mill

25
Chart No 4.1.1
Distribution of the respondents by their age
4.7
95.3
31-40
41-50

26
Table No 4.1.2
Distribution of the respondents by their gender
INFERENCE
From the above table inferred that majority 75 percentages of the respondents are
male and 25 percentages of the respondents are female.
It is found that majority 75 percentages of the respondents are male.
S.no Gender Frequency Percentage
1 Male 112 74.7
2 Female 38 25.3
3 Total 150 100.0

27
Chart No 4.1.2
Distribution of the respondents by their gender
74.7
25.3
Male
Female

28
Table No 4.1.3
Distribution of the respondents by their marital status
INFERENCE
From the above table inferred that majority 96percentages of the respondents is
married and 4percentages of the respondents are unmarried.
It is found that majority 96 percentages of the respondents are married.
S.no Marital status Frequency Percentage
1 Married 144 96.0
2 Not married 6 4.0
3 Total 150 100.0

29
Chart No 4.1.3
Distribution of the respondents by their marital status
96
4
Married
Un married

30
Table No 4.1.4
Distribution of the respondents by their educational qualification
INFERENCE
The above table exhibits that more than half (58 percentages) of the respondents are
primary level 17 percentages of the respondents are un educated and remaining 25
percentages respondents are qualified up to secondary level.
It is found that more than half 58 percentages of the respondents are primary level.
S.no Education level -Frequency Percentage
1 Uneducated 25 16.7
2 Primary level 87 58.0
3 Secondary level 38 25.3
4 Total 150 100.0

31
Chart No 4.1.4
Distribution of the respondents by their educational qualification
16.7
58
25.3
Uneducated
Primary level
Secondary level

32
Table No 4.1.5
Distribution of the respondents by their monthly income
INFERENCE
From the above table reveals that less than 84 percentages of the respondent’s
monthly income above 5000, 16 percentages of the respondents below 3000.
It is found that less than half (84 percentages) of the respondents monthly income is
from above 5000.
S.no Monthly income Frequency Percentage
1 Below 3000 24 16.0
2 Above 5000 126 84.0
3 Total 150 100.0

33
Chart No 4.1.5
Distribution of the respondents by their monthly income
16
84
Below 3000
Above 5000

34
Table No 4.1.6
Distribution of the respondents by their experience in the present job
INFERENCE
It is clear from the above table that less than half (46 percentages) of the respondents
are having above 15 years of work experience. 37 percentages of the respondents are having
5 to 10 years experience. 13 percentages of the respondents are having 10to 15 years
experience and the remaining 4 percentages of the respondents are having below 5 years
experience.
Less than half 46 percentages of the respondents are having above 15 years of work
experience.
S.no Experience Frequency Percentage
1 Below 5 years 6 4.0
2 5 to 10 years 19 12.7
3 10 to 15 years 56 37.3
4 15 to 20 years 69 46.0
5 Total 150 100.0

35
Chart No 4.1.6
Distribution of the respondents by their experience in the present job
4
12.7
37.3
46
Below 5 years
5 to 10 years
10 to 15 years
15 to 20 years

36
Table No 4.1.7
Distribution of the respondents by their department
S.no Department Frequency Percentage
1
Worker 150 100.0
INFERENCE
It is clear from the above table inferred that all 100 percentages of the
respondents are workers.
All 100 percentages of the respondents are workers.
The above table shows that all the respondents should be worker.

37
Chart No 4.1.7
Distribution of the respondents by their department
150
Frequency
Percent

38
Table No 4.1.8
Respondents’ opinion about the fixation of wages
INFERENCE
It is clear from the above table that 31 percentages of the respondents disagree that the
wage fixation is not up to the mark, whereas 25 percentages of the respondents agree 24
percentages of the respondents do not have any opinion 12 percentages of the respondents
strongly agree and the remaining 8percent of the respondents strongly disagree.
It is found that 31 percentages of the respondents disagree that the wage fixation is
not up to the mark.
S.no Opinion Frequency Percentage
1 Strongly agree 18 12.0
2 Agree 37 24.7
3 Neutral 36 24.0
4 Disagree 47 31.3
5 Strongly disagree 12 8.0
6 Total 150 100.0

39
Chart No 4.1.8
Respondents’ opinion about the fixation of wages
12
24.7
24
31.3
8
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree

40
Table No 4.1.9
Respondent’s opinion towards the allotment of overtime
INFERENCE
It is understood from the above table that half 50 percentages of the respondents do
not have any opinion about the overtime allotted to them are creating tiresome. Whereas 34
percentages of the respondents disagree, 8 percentages of the respondents agree and the rest 4
percent each of the respondents strongly agree and strongly disagree respectively.
Half 50percentages of the respondents do not have any opinion about the overtime
allotted to them are creating tiresome.
2 Agree 12 8.0
3 Neutral 75 50.0
4 Disagree 51 34.0
6 Total 150 100.0

41
Chart No 4.1.9
Respondent’s opinion towards the allotment of overtime
4
8
50
34
4
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree

42
Table No 4.1.10
Respondent’s opinion on the incentives schemes followed by the
organization
INFERENCE
It is evident from the above table 38 percentages of the respondents disagree that the
incentives scheme in the organization are not up to the mark 21 percentages of the
respondents agree and do not have any opinion respectively 16 percentages of the
respondents strongly agree and remaining 4 percentages of the respondents strongly disagree.
It is found that 38 percentages of the respondents disagree that the incentives scheme
in the organization are not up to the mark.
2 Agree 32 21.3
3 Neutral 31 20.7
4 Disagree 57 38.0
6 Total 150 100.0

43
Chart No 4.1.10
Respondent’s opinion on the incentives schemes followed by the
organization
16
21.3
20.7
38
4
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree

44
Table No 4.1.11
Respondent’s opinion on the provision of allowance and working hours
INFERENCE
It is clear from the above the table that as high 41 percentages of the respondents
agree that the allowance are not worth to their working hours. Whereas 23 percentages of the
respondents disagree. 16 percentages of the respondents strongly agree.13 percentages of the
respondents strongly disagree and remaining 8 percentages of the respondents do not have
any opinion.
It is found that as high as 41 percentages of the respondents agree that the allowances
are not worth to their working hours.
2 Agree 62 41.3
3 Neutral 12 8.0
4 Disagree 33 22.0
6 Total 150 100.0

45
Chart No 4.1.11
Respondent’s opinion on the provision of allowance and working hours
16
41.3
8
22
12.7
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree

46
Table No 4.1.12
Respondent’s opinion towards the workplace and working condition
INFERENCE
The above table shows that the majority 72 percentages of the respondents disagree that
the workplace exists with unsafe working condition. 12 percentages of the respondents strongly
agree and disagree respectively 4 percentages of the respondents agree that the workplace
exists with unsafe working condition.
It is found that majority 72 percentages of the respondents disagree that the workplace
exists with unsafe working condition.
2 Agree 6 4.0
3 Disagree 108 72.0
5 Total 150 100.0

47
Chart No 4.1.12
Respondent’s opinion towards the workplace and working condition
12
4
72
12
Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly disagree

48
Table No 4.1.13
Respondents opinion about simplify in the work place
INFERENCE
The above table reveals that majority 71 percentages of the respondents strongly agree
that the workplace were found simplify and 29 percentages of the respondents agree.
Majority 71 percentages of the respondents strongly agree that the work place were
found with simplify.
2 Agree 44 29.3
3 Total 150 100.0

49
Chart No 4.1.13
Respondents opinion about simplify in the work place
70.7
29.3
Strongly agree
Agree

50
Table No 4.1.14
Respondents’ opinion toward the level of safety towards handling
equipments
INFERENCE
It is evident from the above that most 67 percentages of the respondents strongly
agree that the level of safety towards handling materials are unsafe, 24 percentages of the
respondents agree and remaining 9 percentages of the respondents disagree.
It is found that the most 67 percentages of the respondents strongly agree that the
level of safety toward handling material is unsafe.
2 Agree 36 24.0
3 Disagree 13 8.7
4
Total 150 100.0

51
Chart No 4.1.15
Respondents’ opinion toward the level of safety towards handling
equipments
67.3
24
8.7
Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree

52
Table No 4.1.15
Respondent’s opinion towards the handling of defective tools and
equipment
2 Agree 18 12.0
4 Total 150 100.0
INFERENCE
It is understood from the above that most 67 percentages of the respondents strongly
agree that the work place with defective tools and equipments to handle while 21 percentages
of the respondents disagree and remaining 12 percentages of the respondents agree that the
work place with defective tools and equipment in handle.
It is found that most 67 percentages of the respondents strongly agree that the work
place exists, defective tools and equipments to handle.

53
Chart No 4.1.15
Respondent’s opinion towards the handling of defective tools and
equipment
67.3
12
20.7
Strongly agree
Agree
Strongly agree

54
Table No 4.1.16
Respondent’s opinion towards supervisor following favoritism
2 Agree 100 66.7
3 Disagree 37 24.7
4
Total 150 100.0
INFERENCE
The above table exhibits that most 67 percentages of the respondents agree that the
supervisor favoritism. Whereas 25 percentages of the respondents disagree 9 percent of the
respondents strongly agree.
It is found that most 67 percentages of the respondents agree that the supervisor
follows favoritism.

55
Chart No 4.1.16
Respondent’s opinion towards supervisor following favoritism
8.7
66.7
24.7
Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree

56
Table No 4.1.17
Opinion of the respondents about the grievances in continuity of their
service
INFERENCE
The above table exhibits that majority 79 percentages of the respondents disagree that
their grievances in continuing their service whereas 17 percentages of the respondents
strongly disagree and the remaining 4 percentages of the respondents agree.
It is found that majority 79 percentages of the respondents disagree that their
grievance in continuing their service
1 Agree 6 4.0
2 Disagree 119 79.3
4
Total 150 100.0

57
Chart No 4.1.17
Opinion of the respondents about the grievances in continuity of their
service
4
79.3
16.7
Agree
Disagree
Strongly disagree

58
Table No 4.1.18
Respondent’s opinion toward the disciplinary rules
2 Agree 26 17.0
3 Total 150 100.0
INFERENCE
The above table shows that majority 83 percentages of the respondents stated that the
company conducted disciplinary rules and 17 percentages of the respondents opined no.
It is found that majority 83 percentages of the respondents stated that the company
conducted disciplinary rules.

59
Chart No 4.1.18
Respondent’s opinion toward the disciplinary rules
83
17
Strongly agree
Agree

60
Table No 4.1.19
Respondent’s opinion toward getting appropriate leaves
INFERENCE
From the above table shows that majority 76 percentages of the respondents agree that
their company grant leaves appropriate and 24 percentages of the respondents strongly agree.
Majority 76 percentages of the respondents agree that their company appropriately.
2 Agree 113 75.3
3 Total 150 100.0

61
Chart No 4.1.19
Respondent’s opinion toward getting appropriate leaves
24.7
75.3
Strongly agree
Agree

62
Table No 4.1.20
Respondent’s opinion towards satisfaction on medical facilities
INFERENCE
The above shows that majority 75 percentages of the respondents agree that they were
satisfied towards the medical facilities and 25 percentages of the respondents strongly agree.
It is found that majority 75 percentages of the respondents agree they were satisfied
towards medical facilities.
2 Agree 113 75.3
3 Total 150 100.0

63
Chart No 4.1.20
Respondent’s opinion towards satisfaction on medical facilities
24.7
75.3
Strongly agree
Agree

64
Table No 4.2.1
ANOVA Based On Age And Overtime Allotted
Null Hypothesis (Hο): There is no significant difference between age and over time
allotted.
Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 28.620 1 28.620 58.635 .000
Within Groups 72.240 148 .488
Total 100.860 149
Interpretation:
From the above table it is interpreted that, for 1 and 148 degrees of freedom, the critical
value is 0.00 for α = 0.05, the calculated value of F is greater than the critical value, we
reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis.
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that, there is significance difference between the
age and overtime allotted. Hence the null hypothesis is rejected.

65
Table No 4.2.2
ANOVA based on Experience and Handling equipment
Null Hypothesis (Hο): There is no significant different between experience and handling
equipment.
Interpretation:
From the above table it is interpreted that, for 3 and 146 degrees of freedom, the
critical value is 0.00 for α = 0.05, the calculated value of F is greater than the critical value,
we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis
INFERENCE
experience and handling equipment.
Between Groups 80.028 3 26.676 109.797 .000
Within Groups 35.472 146 .243
Total 115.500 149

66
Table No 4.2.3
ANOVA based on income and allowance
Null Hypothesis (Hο): There is no significant difference between income and allowance
working hours.
Interpretation:
From the above table it is interpreted that, for 1 and 149 degrees of freedom, the
critical value is 0.00 for α = 0.05, the calculated value of F is greater than the critical value,
we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis
INFERENCE
income and work allowance.
Between Groups 50.035 1 50.035 46.821 .000
Within Groups 158.159 148 1.069
Total 208.193 149

67
z-TEST
Table No 4.3.1
z Test based on Gender and Economic
Null Hypothesis (Hο): There is no significant difference between gender and economic.
Gender N Mean S.D Z value Sig
Male 113 10.247 3.57
2.0531 0.04
Female 37 17.00 1.15
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that, there is significance difference
between the gender and economic. Hence the null hypothesis is rejected.
Table no 4.3.2
z Test based on Gender and Workgroup
Null Hypothesis (Hο): There is no significant difference between gender and workgroup.
Male 113 6.69 1.5
17.8049 0.00
Female 37 12.86 1.81
INFERENCE
gender and workgroup. Hence the null hypothesis is rejected.

68
Table No 4.3.3
z Test based on Gender and Work Environment
Null Hypothesis (Hο): There is no significant difference between gender and work
environment.
Male 113 8.23 1.17
18.7123 0.00
Female 37 10.32 .94
INFERENCE
gender and work environment. Hence the null hypothesis is rejected.

69
CHAPTER V
FINDINGS, SUGGESTIONS AND CONCLUSION
5.1 Findings
 96 %of the respondents are in the age between 41 and 50 years.
 75% of the respondents are male.
 96% of the respondents are married.
 58 % of the respondents have completed their primary level education.
 46 % of the respondent’s monthly income lies between Rs.5001 to 10000.
 46 % of the respondents are having above 15 years of work experience.
 31 % of the respondents disagree that the wage fixation is not up to the mark.
 50 % of the respondents do not have any opinion about the overtime allotted to them
are creating tiresome.
 38% of the respondents disagree that the incentive schemes in the organization are not
up to the mark.
 41 % of the respondents agree that the allowances are not worth to their working
hours.
 72 % of the respondents disagree that the work place exists with unsafe working
condition.
 71 % of the respondents strongly agree that the workplace were found with
illumination.
 67% of the respondents strongly agree that the levels of safety towards handling
materials are unsafe.
 67 % of the respondents strongly agree that the work place exists with defective tools
and equipments to handle.
 67 % of the respondents agree that the supervisor follows favoritism.
 83 % of the respondents agree towards supervisors’ attitude to kindle their regional
feelings.
 83 % of the respondents stated that the company conducted disciplinary rules.
 76 % of the respondents agree that their company grant leaves appropriately.
 75 % of the respondents agree that they were satisfied towards the medical facilities.

70
 There is a significant difference between the age and overtime allotted. Hence the
null hypothesis is rejected.
 There is a significant difference between the experience and equipment handling.
Hence the null hypothesis is rejected.
 There is a significant difference between the income and allowance. Hence the null
hypothesis is rejected.
 There is a significant difference between the gender and economic group. Hence the
null hypothesis is rejected.
 There is a significant difference between the gender and work environment. Hence
the null hypothesis is rejected.
 There is a significant difference between the gender and work group. Hence the null
hypothesis is rejected.

71
5.2 Suggestions
To overcome the grievance there are few needs indentified by the respondents which are
listed out as below
 Due do the lack of grievance redressal procedure, the employees should be given an
opportunity to express their dissatisfaction, which will automatically pave a way to
settle their frustration.
 During the times of settlement the satisfaction of the employee should be ultimate
goal of an organization.
 To follow an effective settlement the company needs to keep a check on arbitrary
actions during grievance procedures.
 It is suggested that a good grievance redressal may bring harmonious industrial
relations as employee grievances are settled before they turn into industrial conflict.
5.3 Conclusion
The employee with a grievance first approaches his supervisor/manager and conveys his
problems, verbally. This grievance may also be expressed in a conference of a discussion
specifically arranged for this purpose. The grievance can be settled at this stage if the
supervisor has the requisite people management and problem solving skills. If the employee
is not satisfied with the settlement, the supervisor forwards this grievance to a higher-level
manager or departmental head with a not mentioning the grievance of the employee and the
failure in the first stage of redressal. The manager solving the grievance at this level may be
a business manager or superintendent or an industrial relations officer who checks the
grievance and gives his verdict.
In case of Cambodia Mills Limited the procedures followed by the organization was very
much satisfying and from the survey it was found that almost all the respondents are satisfied
towards the grievance procedures of the organization. The study concludes that this shall be
kept intact to achieve the satisfaction level among employees and organization.

72
BIBLIOGRAPHY
 Biswanath Ghosh, “Human resources development and management”, publishing
house pvt ltd, 2000, Pp 284-294.
Reprinted 2005, 2006,2007,2008,2009.
 European Trade Union Institute (1989) Collective Bargaining in Western Europe
 Garry Dessler, “Human Resource Management” Prentice hall of India, 7th edition,
reprint 1997, Pp 543.
 Indrasen I “Some correlation and perception of organizational climate managerial
psychology” Pp 35-45.
 Kothari C R, “Research Methodology Methods and Techniques” 2nd edition Vishwa
Prakashan Pp 227-299.
 Ozaki (1987), 'Labour Relations in the Public Service,' IL Review, July – Aug.
 Prasad I M “Organizational Behaviour” Sultan Chand&Sons Reprient 1998, Pp 229-
350.
 Schregle J (1991)'Workers Participation in Decisions Within Undertaking' IL Review
Jan – Feb.
 VSP Rao, “Human resource management”2nd edition 2005, Pp 491-506.
WEBSITE:
 www.ntc.com (Industry profile and company details) may 28
 www.wikipedia.com may 26
 www.borjournals.com . June 6
 www.indianmba.com/../fc338.html June 8
 Www.Cambodia@vsnl.net June 11
 www.http:ststististic.leard.com/….one-way Anova
 www.businessdictionary.com/definition/grievance.htm may 20
 www.griev.com/whatisagrievance.html. may 22
 http://www.le.ac.uk/bl/gat/virtualfc/Sta...
 http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/research-methodology.html#ixzz3DwXxuxQW

73
Questionnaire
A Study on Employees Grievence Handling Procedures in Cambodia mills
ltd, Coimbatore
Personal profile:
1. Age
a) Below 25 b) 25-30 c) 31-40
d) 41-50 e) Above 50
2. Gender
a) Male b) Female
3. Marital status
a) Married b) Unmarried
4. Educational Qualification
A) Illiterate b) Primary level
c) Secondary Level c) higher secondary Level
5. Monthly income
a) Below Rs, 3000 b) 3001-5000
c) Above Rs.5000
6. Experience in the present job
A) Below 5 years b) 5 to 10 years
C) 10 to 15 years d) 15 to 20 years
7. In which department are you working now?
A) Management b) Supervisor
C) Worker d) Executive

74
Economic
8. Do you think that wage fixation is not up the mark?
a) Strongly agree b) Agree c) Neutral
d) Disagree e) strongly disagree
9. Do you feel that the overtime allotted to you is creating tiresome?
10. Do you feel that the incentives scheme in the organization is not up to the mark?
11. Do you agree that the allowance is not worth to your working hours?
Work environment
12. Do you think that the workplace you work is unsealing working condition?
13. Do you feel that the workplace you work is having illumination?
14. Do you think that the levels of safety towards handling equipments are unsafe?

75
15. Do you feel that the work place exists with defective tools and equipments?
Supervision
16. Do you think that your supervisor follows favoritism?
Work group
17. Do you feel you have grievances in continuity of service?
18. Do you have any opinion towards the disciplinary rules?
19. Do you feel the company is appropriate in granting leaves?
20. Are you satisfied towards the medical facilities?

Dhanasekaran - Copy

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Mais procurados (20)

Destaque

Destaque (20)

Semelhante a Dhanasekaran - Copy

Semelhante a Dhanasekaran - Copy (20)

Dhanasekaran - Copy