JUSTIFICATION REPORT Justification ReportComment by David Alan Coia: The main problem with this paper is that there is too much repetition. Report on Company Cafeteria Use, Safety and Security Table of content I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. INTRODUCTION III. PROBLEM STATEMENT IV. OVERVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES V. CRITERIA VI. RECOMMENDATIONS Executive Summary This justification report analyses analyzes the importance of implementing new rules in regard tofor our cafeteria food services here at John Company. It examines the possible new rules that can be adopted to help the employees benefit more of from their company's resources in place. The method of analysis will include but not limited to, among other things, changing the break time for lunch, adding additional food to the menu, and allowing employees to eat any food they desire. In addition, it will include a research conducted among the company staff for the purposes of determining employees' food tastes and their effects on different employees based on their dietary restrictions.Comment by David Alan Coia: Referes to?Comment by David Alan Coia: Use two spaces after end punctuation.Comment by David Alan Coia: Tastes? The results of research shows that the three examined alternatives would have a great impact on workers productivities. INTRODUCTION This report features the findings of an investigation conducted about the usage and safety of Sana Company cafeteria. Mr. Smith, Human Resource Manager, requested this the report, which will include recommendations for the improvement of current rules. It was prepared by Mr. Jackson, the construction site supervisor of Construction Site and submitted to Mr. Smith on 10/24/2014October 24, 2014. PROBLEM STATEMENT Many employees complain about the lunch conditions they are at the moment in regards to their lunchtimes aand the safety they hope to have while dinning in the cafeteria. Employees are also experiencing problems with the food, because the menu only offers only three different foodsentrees. Safety has been a constant issue for most of them employees, because they do not want to be disturbed while enjoying their meals.Comment by David Alan Coia: Perhaps you can clarify what you mean by "safety" here. OVERVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES Alternative 1 –LUNCHTIME CHANGE: This will involve changing employee’s' lunchtime. It will give them more flexibility and allow them to be more productive throughout the day. Alternative 2-FOOD MENU CHANGE: This will involve changing the company food menu and allowing for a wider variety of food to be served in the cafeteria. Most of the employees come from different cultures and the tastes of the food should be as diverse as they arepossible. A great advantage of such change is that will make increae employee s more enthusiasmtic about working for the company. Alternative 3 –ENFORCING THE SAFETY AND HYGENE IN THE CAFETARIA: The enforcement of safety rules for of workers in this placethe ca ...

1. JUSTIFICATION REPORT
Justification ReportComment by David Alan Coia: The main
problem with this paper is that there is too much repetition.
Report on Company Cafeteria Use, Safety and Security
Table of content
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
II. INTRODUCTION
III. PROBLEM STATEMENT
IV. OVERVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES
V. CRITERIA
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS

2. Executive Summary
This justification report analyses analyzes the importance of
implementing new rules in regard tofor our cafeteria food
services here at John Company. It examines the possible new
rules that can be adopted to help the employees benefit more of
from their company's resources in place. The method of analysis
will include but not limited to, among other things, changing
the break time for lunch, adding additional food to the menu,
and allowing employees to eat any food they desire. In addition,
it will include a research conducted among the company staff
for the purposes of determining employees' food tastes and their
effects on different employees based on their dietary
restrictions.Comment by David Alan Coia: Referes to?Comment
by David Alan Coia: Use two spaces after end
punctuation.Comment by David Alan Coia: Tastes?
The results of research shows that the three examined
alternatives would have a great impact on workers
productivities.
INTRODUCTION
This report features the findings of an investigation conducted
about the usage and safety of Sana Company cafeteria. Mr.
Smith, Human Resource Manager, requested this the report,
which will include recommendations for the improvement of
current rules. It was prepared by Mr. Jackson, the construction
site supervisor of Construction Site and submitted to Mr. Smith

3. on 10/24/2014October 24, 2014.
PROBLEM STATEMENT
Many employees complain about the lunch conditions they are
at the moment in regards to their lunchtimes aand the safety
they hope to have while dinning in the cafeteria. Employees are
also experiencing problems with the food, because the menu
only offers only three different foodsentrees. Safety has been a
constant issue for most of them employees, because they do not
want to be disturbed while enjoying their meals.Comment by
David Alan Coia: Perhaps you can clarify what you mean by
"safety" here.
OVERVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1 –LUNCHTIME CHANGE: This will involve
changing employee’s' lunchtime. It will give them more
flexibility and allow them to be more productive throughout the
day.
Alternative 2-FOOD MENU CHANGE: This will involve
changing the company food menu and allowing for a wider
variety of food to be served in the cafeteria. Most of the
employees come from different cultures and the tastes of the
food should be as diverse as they arepossible. A great advantage
of such change is that will make increae employee s more
enthusiasmtic about working for the company.
Alternative 3 –ENFORCING THE SAFETY AND HYGENE IN
THE CAFETARIA: The enforcement of safety rules for of
workers in this placethe cafeteria is important, because as many
of thememployees use the cafeteria as a place to relax before
going back to their respective tasks. Making sure they are well
protected from any harm is important. Another important choice
thing to consider is making ensureing that food are is cooked in
front of the workers, so they will know that it is prepared in the

4. most hygiene hygienic of circumstances.Comment by David
Alan Coia: Again, what harm can their be I the cafeteria? See
note four.
CRITERIA
There were criteria used by John Company to evaluate the
viability of the alternatives, but some proved to be more
important, for example: . Here are the most important
criteria’s:Comment by David Alan Coia: Use active voice.
Costs –The Company would like to provide the an improved
cafeteria menu, but it must will keep consider the costs
associated with in considerationimprovements throughout the
whole process, because the budget is as, it is running on a tight
budget this year.
Safety and Health – The cafeteria menu should be diverse for so
employees to may enjoy different types of food.
Timing – The new rules should allow employees to have their
lunch at a better time whole while minimizing the waste of
time.
Popularity – Researcher noted that most employees enjoy
having a great and friendly place for them to eat and enjoy their
break.
Achievability – It is a new procedure that will involve changing
the work schedule, but would likely to help raise productivity.
RESEARCH METHOD
The research methods included changing company cafeteria
rules, changing lunchtime, and inquiries from employees for
changes related to the menu of food served. Additionally, a
research was conducted among the company staff to determine
the food tastes of each employees and results were drawn form
itfrom that research.
After evaluation of each alternatives and criteria, the following
findings and analysis were of assistance in crafting this
recommendation.

5. RECOMMENDATIONS:
In order to correct the unsatisfactory situation that most of the
employees are experiencing daily, Mr. Jackson suggests that
consideration be given to the following measures:
1. Change Lunch lunch time for employees
2. Offer a different menu with wide variety of choices and
upgraded with dietary information
3. Allowing employees to eat as much as they wish without
imposing control on them
4. Providing new safety rules associated with the use of the
cafeteria
5. Enforcing the hygiene associated with the food served to
employees
REFERENCES
Wanjek, C. (2005). Food at Work: Workplace
Solution
s for Malnutrition, Obesity and Chronic Diseases. (Publication?)
Geneva, SW: International Labor Organization.
Smith, A., F., (2007). The Oxford Companion to American
Food and Drink. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

6. Second part of assignment
In Part 1 of your Justification Report assignment, you built up
the following sections: Problem Statement, Overview of
Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods. In Part 2, you will revise
Part 1 based on your instructor's suggestions and add to it the
following sections: Evaluation of Alternatives, Findings and
Analysis, and References.
Use the basic outline below to draft your paper. Organize your
responses to each question under the following section
headings:
· Evaluation of Alternatives (for Questions 1-3)
· Findings and Analysis (for Questions 4-5)
· References (for Question 6)
Write a two (2) page, single-spaced report in which you:
1. Research the two (2) alternatives (i.e. possible solutions) that
you've identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives
section. Record bibliographic information during research.
a. Example: You might research other organizations that have
attempted similar solutions to the problem you have identified
and explore the results of those experiments.
2. Use what you discover in your research to evaluate each

7. alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.
a. Example: If your research revealed that four companies
similar to yours increased productivity after allowing their
workers to telework from home three days per week, you might
conclude that one of your suggested alternatives – in this case,
the option to telework from home three days per week –
satisfies one of your criterion of “Productivity” as a high-
potential solution to a problem you’ve identified (of decreased
worker morale and productivity at Doe’s Electronics). However,
additional research might frustrate a recommendation of this
alternative if it is found to fall short of other criteria while a
second alternative fares better. For instance, a telework
alternative might be found to be too costly to implement; too
frustrating for consumers who prefer daily, in-person customer
service; or too divergent from the company’s brand, “Always
there for you!”�
3. Organize the assignment by your criteria. Explain in narrative
form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against
your first criterion. Next, explain how each alternative stacks up
against your second criterion, etc.
a. Example: An abbreviated outline of what this longer section
might look like based on the above example is below (Note:
Only the first two [2] of five [5] required criteria are included
to give you a feel for the structure). Your researched findings,
represented as circled bullets below, should be explained in two

8. to five (2-5) sentences. Include in-text citations and follow up
with References in APA style):
Evaluation of Alternatives
· Productivity
1.
2. Alternative A: Telework from home 3 days per week
1. {narrate findings based on research article 1 here}
2. Alternative B: Offer two extra Floating Holidays to each
employee per year
2. {narrate findings based on research article 2 here}
1. Cost
1.
4. Alternative A: Telework from home 3 days per week
1. {narrate findings based on research article 1 here}
4. Alternative B: Offer two extra Floating Holidays to each
employee per year
4.
3. {narrate findings based on research article 2 here}
1. Briefly summarize in narrative form the major discoveries
that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternatives section.
1. Include a chart like the ones below to illustrate at a glance:
Figure 1: Alternatives Analyzed by Criteria
Criteria

9. Telework Option
Floating Holiday Option
Productivity
Very high
Negligible increase
Cost
Very high
Moderate
Company Image
Increased
Negligible increase
Worker Morale
Increased
Negligible increase
Practicality
Moderate
Low
TOTAL Feasibility* of Alternatives based on Criteria?
Moderate to High
Low to Moderate
1.
*Feasability = Capability of an alternative being carried out
with success
1. Include an APA style (6th edition) References page that

10. documents the two (2) sources (minimum) that you used and
cited in-text in your Evaluation of Alternatives section. Note
that both resources may be secondary resources, or you may
include one primary source and one secondary source.
Remember that both in-text citations and References must be
included (to avoid plagiarism) whenever you are directly
quoting, summarizing, or paraphrasing researched material.
Your assignment must:
· Be typed, single spaced, using Times New Roman font (size
12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references
must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your
professor for any additional instructions.
· Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment,
your name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the
date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in
the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this
assignment are:
· Support ideas or claims in body paragraphs with clear details,
examples, and explanations.
· Organize ideas logically by using transitional words, phrases,
and sentences.
· Use sentence variety and effective word choice in written
communication.

11. · Apply writing process strategies to develop formal business
reports and / or proposals.
· Use technology and information resources to research issues
related to selected topics.
· Write clearly and concisely using proper writing mechanics.
Consider the feedback from your professor and / or online tutor
when making your revisions.