So what do we mean when we talk about Crossref metadata? Why have we been asking for so much more than the DOI over the last few years?
It’s all about connections. The end goal is to help facilitate better connections between all research outputs and involvement in the research, updates to the research, and so on.
Prototype of Participation Reports - Elsevier does very well - made commitment to support text mining so license and full-text metadata is really good.
Prototype of Participation Reports - Elsevier does very well - made commitment to support text mining so license and full-text metadata is really good.
Didn’t want to call out any member in particular but this is a large Korean society about the same size in terms of number of works in Crossref - around 4-5 thousand DOIs. But you can see the record is pretty thin.
So anyone looking at things from a funding data perspective is just going to miss out on this publisher’s content. Anyone looking to mine text through Crossref is also going to be excluding this publisher’s content. Which is a shame but demonstrates why we are starting to build up this education program and provide tools like this.
Chances are this publisher doesn’t even know that it’s possible to create all of these additional entry points.
Local example - we were at their building yesterday - a pretty “complete” or “rich” record! (No ORCID iDs tho)
Also using Crossmark
We know that we need to now tell a broader story about why the richer metadata matters over and above the identifier,
We also need to make it easy to show them what they are actually doing with us.
Until recently we talked a lot about the importance of persistent identifiers. Since then then we’ve realised that identifiers are really just the first step and it’s the metadata that accompanies the identifiers that we have to make more noise about. Today, we’re moving the conversation on from PIDs, and talking about the power of metadata.
Over the last six months we’ve gathered a number of representatives from all across the industry, representing the many different metadata standards and uses of all kinds of scholarly metadata, to form a Steering Group to help guide vision and help create some actionable goals.
And we’ve conducted research across the community to formulate a number of key insights - as a result we’ve planning to launch next month Metadata 2020. It will be an advocacy campaign to create a common understanding of why metadata is so important, with shared messaging, educational resources, and tools for us all to use.
This breakout session today aims to get your reaction to some of those insights and contribute to the goals in this first phase of discovery and learning.
Until recently we talked a lot about the importance of persistent identifiers. Since then then we’ve realised that identifiers are really just the first step and it’s the metadata that accompanies the identifiers that we have to make more noise about. Today, we’re moving the conversation on from PIDs, and talking about the power of metadata.
Over the last six months we’ve gathered a number of representatives from all across the industry, representing the many different metadata standards and uses of all kinds of scholarly metadata, to form a Steering Group to help guide vision and help create some actionable goals.
And we’ve conducted research across the community to formulate a number of key insights - as a result we’ve planning to launch next month Metadata 2020. It will be an advocacy campaign to create a common understanding of why metadata is so important, with shared messaging, educational resources, and tools for us all to use.
This breakout session today aims to get your reaction to some of those insights and contribute to the goals in this first phase of discovery and learning.
Until recently we talked a lot about the importance of persistent identifiers. Since then then we’ve realised that identifiers are really just the first step and it’s the metadata that accompanies the identifiers that we have to make more noise about. Today, we’re moving the conversation on from PIDs, and talking about the power of metadata.
Over the last six months we’ve gathered a number of representatives from all across the industry, representing the many different metadata standards and uses of all kinds of scholarly metadata, to form a Steering Group to help guide vision and help create some actionable goals.
And we’ve conducted research across the community to formulate a number of key insights - as a result we’ve planning to launch next month Metadata 2020. It will be an advocacy campaign to create a common understanding of why metadata is so important, with shared messaging, educational resources, and tools for us all to use.
This breakout session today aims to get your reaction to some of those insights and contribute to the goals in this first phase of discovery and learning.
Until recently we talked a lot about the importance of persistent identifiers. Since then then we’ve realised that identifiers are really just the first step and it’s the metadata that accompanies the identifiers that we have to make more noise about. Today, we’re moving the conversation on from PIDs, and talking about the power of metadata.
Over the last six months we’ve gathered a number of representatives from all across the industry, representing the many different metadata standards and uses of all kinds of scholarly metadata, to form a Steering Group to help guide vision and help create some actionable goals.
And we’ve conducted research across the community to formulate a number of key insights - as a result we’ve planning to launch next month Metadata 2020. It will be an advocacy campaign to create a common understanding of why metadata is so important, with shared messaging, educational resources, and tools for us all to use.
This breakout session today aims to get your reaction to some of those insights and contribute to the goals in this first phase of discovery and learning.
Until recently we talked a lot about the importance of persistent identifiers. Since then then we’ve realised that identifiers are really just the first step and it’s the metadata that accompanies the identifiers that we have to make more noise about. Today, we’re moving the conversation on from PIDs, and talking about the power of metadata.
Over the last six months we’ve gathered a number of representatives from all across the industry, representing the many different metadata standards and uses of all kinds of scholarly metadata, to form a Steering Group to help guide vision and help create some actionable goals.
And we’ve conducted research across the community to formulate a number of key insights - as a result we’ve planning to launch next month Metadata 2020. It will be an advocacy campaign to create a common understanding of why metadata is so important, with shared messaging, educational resources, and tools for us all to use.
This breakout session today aims to get your reaction to some of those insights and contribute to the goals in this first phase of discovery and learning.
Until recently we talked a lot about the importance of persistent identifiers. Since then then we’ve realised that identifiers are really just the first step and it’s the metadata that accompanies the identifiers that we have to make more noise about. Today, we’re moving the conversation on from PIDs, and talking about the power of metadata.
Over the last six months we’ve gathered a number of representatives from all across the industry, representing the many different metadata standards and uses of all kinds of scholarly metadata, to form a Steering Group to help guide vision and help create some actionable goals.
And we’ve conducted research across the community to formulate a number of key insights - as a result we’ve planning to launch next month Metadata 2020. It will be an advocacy campaign to create a common understanding of why metadata is so important, with shared messaging, educational resources, and tools for us all to use.
This breakout session today aims to get your reaction to some of those insights and contribute to the goals in this first phase of discovery and learning.
Until recently we talked a lot about the importance of persistent identifiers. Since then then we’ve realised that identifiers are really just the first step and it’s the metadata that accompanies the identifiers that we have to make more noise about. Today, we’re moving the conversation on from PIDs, and talking about the power of metadata.
Over the last six months we’ve gathered a number of representatives from all across the industry, representing the many different metadata standards and uses of all kinds of scholarly metadata, to form a Steering Group to help guide vision and help create some actionable goals.
And we’ve conducted research across the community to formulate a number of key insights - as a result we’ve planning to launch next month Metadata 2020. It will be an advocacy campaign to create a common understanding of why metadata is so important, with shared messaging, educational resources, and tools for us all to use.
This breakout session today aims to get your reaction to some of those insights and contribute to the goals in this first phase of discovery and learning.