Developed by the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions and Markets. Part of the collection of materials developed for CGIAR Knowledge Day, Nairobi, November 5, 2013
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Map of CGIAR Research Programs
1. LED BY IFPRI
United Kingdom
Russian Federation
Neth.
Bel.
Germany
Lux.
Ukraine
Czech Rep.
Slovakia
Austria
Kazakhstan
Slov.
France
Italy
Portugal
Kyrgyz Rep.
Uzbekistan
Spain
Turkey
United States
of America
Turkmenistan
Syria
Cyprus
Lebanon
Israel
Palestine
Jordan
Morocco
N. Korea
Tajikistan
S. Korea
Iran
Iraq
China
Afghanistan
Kuwait
Pakistan
Egypt
Japan
Nepal
Mexico
Bhutan
Bangladesh
Dom. Rep.
Haiti
Honduras
Guatemala
El Salvador
Mauritania
Puerto Rico
Guadeloupe
Nicaragua
Costa Rica
Trinidad & Tobago
Panama
Guyana
Senegal
The Gambia
Guinea-Bissau
Guinea
Sierra Leone
Liberia
Colombia
Mali
Niger
Burkina Faso
Benin
Nigeria
Côte
Togo
d'Ivoire Ghana
Cameroon
Chad
Central African
Republic
Philippines
Cambodia Vietnam
Ethiopia
South
Sudan
Sri Lanka
Uganda
Congo,
Dem. Rep.
Lao
PDR
Thailand
Yemen
Sudan
Congo,
Gabon Rep.
Ecuador
Myanmar
India
Taiwan
Malaysia
Brunei
Papua
New Guinea
Singapore
Kenya
Rw.
Bur.
Indonesia
Tanzania
Peru
Solomon Islands
Timor-Leste
Brazil
Angola
Somoa
Malawi
Vanuatu
Zambia
Bolivia
Number of CRP’s in Country
Locations of action sites, beneficiaries,
partnering institutes, and/or nurseries.
1
6
7
8
9
Madagascar
Chile
Australia
New Caledonia
Swaziland
South
Africa
Argentina
Lesotho
Uruguay
15
5
Mauritius
13
4
Namibia
12
3
Zimbabwe Mozambique
11
2
Fiji
10
Note: The color of each country shows the number of CRPs indicated where their action sites, beneficiaries, partnering institutes, and/or nurseries are located. Visit the online version of the map for a more detailed information on which centers work in each country (http://bit.ly/1gR8m5v).
Contributors: HarvestChoice team at IFPRI analyzed the CGIAR CRP Annual Progress Report 2012, and the result was subsequently reviewed and revised by followings contributors – Melanie Bacou (IFPRI; PIM and A4NH), Chandrashekhar Biradar (ICARDA; Dryland Systems), Martin van Brakel (IWMI; WLE),
Glenn Hyman (CIAT; FTA, CCAFS, RTB, WLE, and Livestock and Fish), Andrew Jarvis (CIAT; CCAFS), Andy Nelson (IRRI; GRiSP), Leocadio Sebastian (IRRI; CCAFS), Salman Siddiqui (IWMI; WLE), Kai Sonder (CIMMYT; MAIZE and WHEAT), and Maarten van Zonneveld (Bioversity; CCAFS, PIM, A4NH, and Genebanks).
2. LED BY IFPRI
United Kingdom
Russian Federation
Neth.
Bel.
Germany
Lux.
Ukraine
Czech Rep.
Slovakia
Austria
Kazakhstan
Slov.
France
Italy
Portugal
Kyrgyz Rep.
Uzbekistan
Spain
Turkey
United States
of America
Turkmenistan
Syria
Cyprus
Lebanon
Israel
Palestine
Jordan
Morocco
N. Korea
Tajikistan
S. Korea
Iran
Iraq
China
Afghanistan
Kuwait
Pakistan
Egypt
Japan
Nepal
Mexico
Bhutan
Bangladesh
Dom. Rep.
Haiti
Honduras
Guatemala
El Salvador
Mauritania
Puerto Rico
Guadeloupe
Nicaragua
Costa Rica
Trinidad & Tobago
Panama
Guyana
Senegal
The Gambia
Guinea-Bissau
Guinea
Sierra Leone
Liberia
Colombia
Mali
Niger
Burkina Faso
Benin
Nigeria
Côte
Togo
d'Ivoire Ghana
Cameroon
Chad
Central African
Republic
Philippines
Cambodia Vietnam
Ethiopia
South
Sudan
Sri Lanka
Uganda
Congo,
Dem. Rep.
Lao
PDR
Thailand
Yemen
Sudan
Congo,
Gabon Rep.
Ecuador
Myanmar
India
Taiwan
Malaysia
Brunei
Papua
New Guinea
Singapore
Kenya
Rw.
Bur.
Indonesia
Tanzania
Peru
Solomon Islands
Timor-Leste
Brazil
Angola
Somoa
Malawi
Vanuatu
Zambia
Bolivia
Number of CRP’s in Country
Locations of action sites, beneficiaries,
partnering institutes, and/or nurseries.
1
6
7
8
9
Madagascar
Chile
Australia
New Caledonia
Swaziland
South
Africa
Argentina
Lesotho
Uruguay
15
5
Mauritius
13
4
Namibia
12
3
Zimbabwe Mozambique
11
2
Fiji
10
Note: The color of each country shows the number of CRPs indicated where their action sites, beneficiaries, partnering institutes, and/or nurseries are located. Visit the online version of the map for a more detailed information on which centers work in each country (http://bit.ly/1gR8m5v).
Contributors: HarvestChoice team at IFPRI analyzed the CGIAR CRP Annual Progress Report 2012, and the result was subsequently reviewed and revised by followings contributors – Melanie Bacou (IFPRI; PIM and A4NH), Chandrashekhar Biradar (ICARDA; Dryland Systems), Martin van Brakel (IWMI; WLE),
Glenn Hyman (CIAT; FTA, CCAFS, RTB, WLE, and Livestock and Fish), Andrew Jarvis (CIAT; CCAFS), Andy Nelson (IRRI; GRiSP), Leocadio Sebastian (IRRI; CCAFS), Salman Siddiqui (IWMI; WLE), Kai Sonder (CIMMYT; MAIZE and WHEAT), and Maarten van Zonneveld (Bioversity; CCAFS, PIM, A4NH, and Genebanks).
3. LED BY IFPRI
United Kingdom
Russian Federation
Neth.
Bel.
Germany
Lux.
Ukraine
Czech Rep.
Slovakia
Austria
Kazakhstan
Slov.
France
Italy
Portugal
Kyrgyz Rep.
Uzbekistan
Spain
Turkey
United States
of America
Turkmenistan
Syria
Cyprus
Lebanon
Israel
Palestine
Jordan
Morocco
N. Korea
Tajikistan
S. Korea
Iran
Iraq
China
Afghanistan
Kuwait
Pakistan
Egypt
Japan
Nepal
Mexico
Bhutan
Bangladesh
Dom. Rep.
Haiti
Honduras
Guatemala
El Salvador
Mauritania
Puerto Rico
Guadeloupe
Nicaragua
Costa Rica
Trinidad & Tobago
Panama
Guyana
Senegal
The Gambia
Guinea-Bissau
Guinea
Sierra Leone
Liberia
Colombia
Mali
Niger
Burkina Faso
Benin
Nigeria
Côte
Togo
d'Ivoire Ghana
Cameroon
Chad
Central African
Republic
Philippines
Cambodia Vietnam
Ethiopia
South
Sudan
Sri Lanka
Uganda
Congo,
Dem. Rep.
Lao
PDR
Thailand
Yemen
Sudan
Congo,
Gabon Rep.
Ecuador
Myanmar
India
Taiwan
Malaysia
Brunei
Papua
New Guinea
Singapore
Kenya
Rw.
Bur.
Indonesia
Tanzania
Peru
Solomon Islands
Timor-Leste
Brazil
Angola
Somoa
Malawi
Vanuatu
Zambia
Bolivia
Number of CRP’s in Country
Locations of action sites, beneficiaries,
partnering institutes, and/or nurseries.
1
6
7
8
9
Madagascar
Chile
Australia
New Caledonia
Swaziland
South
Africa
Argentina
Lesotho
Uruguay
15
5
Mauritius
13
4
Namibia
12
3
Zimbabwe Mozambique
11
2
Fiji
10
Note: The color of each country shows the number of CRPs indicated where their action sites, beneficiaries, partnering institutes, and/or nurseries are located. Visit the online version of the map for a more detailed information on which centers work in each country (http://bit.ly/1gR8m5v).
Contributors: HarvestChoice team at IFPRI analyzed the CGIAR CRP Annual Progress Report 2012, and the result was subsequently reviewed and revised by followings contributors – Melanie Bacou (IFPRI; PIM and A4NH), Chandrashekhar Biradar (ICARDA; Dryland Systems), Martin van Brakel (IWMI; WLE),
Glenn Hyman (CIAT; FTA, CCAFS, RTB, WLE, and Livestock and Fish), Andrew Jarvis (CIAT; CCAFS), Andy Nelson (IRRI; GRiSP), Leocadio Sebastian (IRRI; CCAFS), Salman Siddiqui (IWMI; WLE), Kai Sonder (CIMMYT; MAIZE and WHEAT), and Maarten van Zonneveld (Bioversity; CCAFS, PIM, A4NH, and Genebanks).