29. •Exploratory/Scoping
•Reuse/Secondary data analysis
•Can be starting point or ad hoc
•Peer review
•Reproduce/extend results
•Repurpose (e.g. for mashups, visualisations, simulations)
•Verify claims (e.g. report findings)
*Not in any order; not exhaustive!
30.
31. •Google
•Ask a colleague
•Find link to data in a journal article
•Data journals
•Data registries e.g. re3data.org
•Open data portals e.g. data.gov
•Institutional repositories
•Data / Discipline repositories e.g. Dryad
•Project website
•Data discovery aggregators like Research Data Australia, Google Dataset
•Library catalogues, databases
*Not in any order; not exhaustive!
32. When creating metadata records, keep in mind that finding data is:
● Movable feast / changing beast
● No standard practice, universal standard or vocab
● Databases are non-exhaustive
● Methods for searching and terms driven by why people are
looking and how the data is stored
33. ● Together, we’re going to build a rainbow of discipline specific data
examples!
● Working in pairs, explore re3data (or beyond!) to find data sources that
you would recommend for any specific number of disciplines.
● For each data source:
a. find some data
b. tell us how you got there - eg google or repository
c. why it’s a good example to show someone else.
34. Here are some scenarios to start you off:
○ Showing a researcher where they might find social science data
○ Data that may not have a disciplinary “home”
○ Incredibly niche specialised scientific data (find a rabbit hole)
○ Australian geographic and/or spatialised data
○ Internet time server data
○ Geological sample data
● re3data.org
● https://researchdata.ands.org.au/
● https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/
● https://ada.edu.au/
● http://www.geosamples.org/
● https://riojournal.com/
41. Your task:
1. Work as a team at your tables
2. Take one of the CSV datasets at
3. Describe the dataset by creating a metadata record. Think
about: title, creators, date, short description and so on.
4. Bring your record to whole class discussion
Exercise time: 10 mins then whole class discussion
44. Your task:
1. Work as a team at your tables
2. Review the record you put together for the CSV file
3. Select a metadata schema of your choice e.g. Dublin Core,
RIF-CS, others..
4. Create a new metadata record using the schema of your choice
and the values (attributes) you listed in your original CSV file
record
Exercise time: 10 mins then whole class discussion
67. Photo by Amaury Salas on Unsplash
Find information about this DOI:
10.4225/08/5858219e78f9a
● What type of research output does this DOI point to?
● What is the organisation associated with this DOI?
● Can you get to the full text from the DOI?
Now search for the same DOI in DataCite search:
https://search.datacite.org/
● How do you cite it in Vancouver style?
● Who issued the DOI?
Finally, go to DataCite stats: https://stats.datacite.org/
● For the Australian National Data Service, which
organisation minted the most DOIs for 2018?
83. There is no change in
the high number of
researchers valuing a
data citation the same
as an article -
from 78% in 2016
to 77% in 2017
Digital Science Report:
The State of Open Data
2017, p.8
84. Your task:
1. Work as a team at your tables
2. Look up and read what these publishers are saying about data citation:
• Wiley’s Data Citation Policy -
https://authorservices.wiley.com/author-resources/Journal-Authors/open-
access/data-sharing-citation/index.html
• Springer Nature Research Data Policy FAQs (why and how cite data) -
https://www.springernature.com/gp/authors/research-data-policy/faqs/12
327154
3. Discuss with each other: are the policies the same? Are the citation
styles the same? Is it clear information for authors?
Exercise time: 5 mins
111. ●
●
●
●
PROS CONS
● Self explanatory
● Easy to follow
● Time saving
● Distribute in
different ways
● Linked to further
resources
● Missing
information
● Information
overload
● May not be
search engine
optimised
● Hard to find