Antea Group consultant Francisco Cordero presented at the 2016 ILTA conference on strategic sustainability, including challenges and opportunities, and practical tactics to build your business case and measure your results.
6. Can The Sustainability Strategy Help Navigate The Storm?
• Force for internal collaboration – ‘Integral’
approach?
• Find new ways to leverage the
organization’s talent & current activities?
• Help create a more ‘long‐term’ mindset
and establish a pace for enduring success?
• Can sustainability help to scale the
company’s best ideas & practices?
• Can we get a few ‘quick wins’ and
communicate the good news to the
organization?
Oil price shock
Declining production
Taxes
Disappointing results
Austerity drive
Personnel cuts
Renegotiation w/suppliers & contractors
Extensive pension liability
Global competition
23. Elements 6 & 7: Articulate Needs & Your Plan
6. Have You Made Your Needs Clear?
• Monetary Resources ‐ How much
overall? Justification for amount?
• Cash Flow ‐ Initial funding and
additional cash flow requirements?
• Human Resources ‐ Staff, cross‐
functional support, volunteers, etc.,
that need to be involved? How much
time?
• Major Decisions – What major
decisions will be needed along the
way?
7. Have You Made Your Plans Clear?
• Planned Efforts – Summarizing what
steps/stages will be required for
solution implementation?
• Schedule – Outlining when work will
be started/finished as well as
associated spending, staffing and
milestones/major decision points?
• Initiative Team – Listing key roles,
responsibilities and individuals that
will lead and manage implementation?
31. Measurement Methods & Myths
1) It’s never been measured
before…
There is a tendency to believe you are the first
to measure, research will most certainly prove
you wrong
2) I have little or no data on the
subject…
Don’t assume only direct answers to your
questions are useful, extrapolation is an
amazing substitute
3) It is not precise enough… Error is inherent to all measurements, don’t be
dismissive, keep the purpose in mind –
uncertainty reduction, not elimination
4) I cannot afford to collect the
information…
Think of your first idea as the ‘hard way’ to
measure, and with a little more ingenuity
you’ll identify an easier, more economical
approach
Let’s start with perceived obstacles that often keep ‘intangibles intangible’
37. Decomposition – Example
Question 1
What Drives Value In Sustainability?
Enhancements In The
Workplace
Question 2
In How Many Ways?
Gains In Resource Efficiency Engages Our Talent
Question 3
To What Degree?
Product Innovations Improves Occupational Health & Safety Increases
Retention Can We:
• Observe?
• Measure?
• Quantify?
• Monetize?
Etc. Improves Working Conditions In The
Supply Chain
Increases
Attraction
Etc. Increases
Productivity
Can we now quantify and monetize increases in employee retention, talent
attraction and productivity due to our investments in sustainability?
42. Putting It Altogether…
Decomposition
POTENTIAL RETURNS FOR INVESTING IN SUSTAINABILITY
Workplace Enhancements – From Greater Engagement of Talent
Reduced Employee Turnover/Replacement & Assoc. Costs
Quantification
# of different employees engaged by the sustainability initiative per
year
500
Duration of initiative (years) 5
% of employees less likely to leave as they are aware and/or involved
in the initiative
12%
# Of Employees Less Likely To Leave 300
Monetization
Cost of employee turnover (% of annual salary) 20%
Average salary of engaged employees ($) $50,000
Total Value Created Over 5 Year Period Due To Reduced Employee
Turnover/Replacement
$3,000,000
43. Example: Investment Cash Flow Analysis
PROTECT: Relevant Cost Avoidance Benefits Category Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
5‐Yr Proj
Benefit
1 Production Losses Averted Business Continuity $95,000 $190,000 $380,000 $380,000 $380,000 $1,425,000
2 Avoid Reputation Damage Reputational Mgt ‐
3 Reduced/Eliminate Response costs Risk Mgt ‐
4 Avoid/Minimize Collateral Damage Cost Risk Mgt ‐
5 Avoid Escalating/Volatile Resource Cost Business Continuity ‐
Total Cost Avoidance Benefit: $95,000 $190,000 $380,000 $380,000 $380,000 $1,425,000
STRENGTHEN: Relevant Cash Savings Benefits Category Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
5‐Yr Proj
Benefit
1 Less Frictional Cost Assoc w/Expansions Capital Productivity $460,000 $920,000 $920,000 $920,000 $920,000 $4,140,000
2 Reduced Resource Consumption Capital Productivity ‐
3 Less Pre‐Treatment Needed Capital Productivity ‐
4 Reduced Future Capital Cost Financial Flexibility ‐
5 Employee Engagement Benefits Emp. Productivity ‐
Total Cash Savings Benefit: $460,000 $920,000 $920,000 $920,000 $ 920,000 $4,140,000
Investment Cost Summary Category Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 5‐Yr Proj Cost
1 Watershed Conservation Practices Inc. in Water Fund $0
2 Landowner Compensation Inc. in Water Fund $0
3 Training, Guidelines, Best Practice Sharing Inc. in Water Fund $0
4 Water Fund Participation (2 FTE @ 10%) Water Fund Element $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $200,000
5 Water Fund Contributions Conservation $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000
Total Cost: $1,040,000 $1,040,000 $1,040,000 $1,040,000 $1,040,000 $5,200,000
Cash Flow Forecast: $(485,000) $70,000 $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 $365,000
Hurdle Rate: Net Present Value > 0: $185,000 PASSED
Hurdle Rate: Internal Rate of Return >15%: 18% PASSED
Assumptions Notes
Discount Rate: 8%; Finance Rate: 8%; Reinvestment Rate: 8%
Gradual ramp‐up of benefit realization as indicated
Gray shaded areas represent additional possible benefits not estimated at this time