SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 295
Introduction to
Theology
An Invitation to Theology?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
“Jesus said to him, ‘Love the Lord your
God with all your heart, with all your
soul, and with all your mind.’”
–Matthew 22:37

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question Outline
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Who are you and why are you here?
What is The Theology Program?
What is theology?
Who is a theologian?
How do we do theology every day?
What are the different categories of
theology?
What is the Theological Process?
What is epistemology?
What is postmodernism?
What questions are postmoderns asking?
What is the postmodern view of truth?
What is the modern view of truth?
What is the Christian view of truth?
What truths are relative and what truths
are objective?

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.

What truths are essential for orthodoxy?
How certain are you about your beliefs?
What is the essential difference in Roman
Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, and
Protestantism?
Why are there so many Protestant
denominations?
What are the different sources for truth?
What are the benefits and deficiencies of
each source?
How do the different sources interact to
form our theology?
Does God still speak today?
What is the Continuationist view of
prophecy?
What is the Hard Cessationist view of
prophecy?
What is the Soft Cessationist view of
prophecy?
How do we do theology in our emerging
context?
Course Outline
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.
X.

Introduction
Defining Theology
Categories of Theology
Postmodern Epistemology
Christian Epistemology
Essentials of Theology
Traditions of Christian Theology
Sources of Theology
Does God Still Speak Today?
Unity and Diversity
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Introduction to
Theology
BIBLICAL THEOLOGY
SYSTEMATIC
THEOLOGY

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question

Who are you and why are you here?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Introduction to
Theology module
Who you are and why you are taking
this course?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Introduction to
Theology module
Who are you and why are you taking
this course?
• Practical Pricilla: You are a person who
Pricilla
has never seen the practicality in deep
theological study. You are here to see if
we can change your mind.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Introduction to
Theology module
Who are you and why are you taking
this course?
2. Scared Susan: Big words scare you. You
Susan
don’t really think that you are smart
enough to be here. You are here this time,
but you may not be here the next.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Introduction to
Theology module
Who are you and why are you taking
this course?
3. Know-it-all Nick: You already know
Nick
everything. You are just here to see if we
do… and to pick up where we leave off.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Introduction to
Theology module
Who are you and why are you taking
this course?
4. Fundamental Fred: You are the GodFred
ordained guardian of orthodoxy. You are
here to sit, with arms crossed, and
protect.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Introduction to
Theology module
Who are you and why are you taking
this course?
5. Want-an-answer Will: You have a lot
Will
of questions. You are here not to do
theology in community, but to write
theology down with a pen and paper.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Introduction to
Theology module
Who are you and why are you taking
this course?
6. Traditionalist Teri: You want to learn,
Teri
but your traditions and preconceived
notions bind you. You are here to have
your traditions confirmed to be true.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Introduction to
the Theology Program
Who are you and why are you taking
this course?
7. Confrontational Carl: You are not a
Carl
believer in Christ or the Bible and have no
intention of becoming one. You are here
to argue.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Introduction to
Theology module
Who are you and why are you taking
this course?
8. Struggling Sam: You are a believer in
Sam
Christ, but you have a lot of doubts and
struggles. You have never had a safe place
to express those doubts. You are here to
see if this is the place.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Introduction to
Theology module
Who are you and why are you taking
this course?
9. Curious Carla: You are not really sure
Carla
why you are here, but you’re excited to
find out.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Introduction to
Theology module
We are all real people created by a real
God, and we all have real struggles,
real questions, and real convictions.
We are glad that you are here!

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question

What is The Theology Program?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Introduction to
Theology module
The Introduction to Theology Module is an intense
theological studies program, designed for busy people
who may never go to seminary but who want deep
theological training. While there are many great
subjects, biblical and spiritual, that Christians can and
need to study, our focus is on seven specific courses
of systematic theology. Our desire is to teach people
how to think by opening their minds to diverse
views, learning from history, wrestling with difficult
issues, and graciously engaging an increasingly
relativistic and postmodern world.
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Introduction to
Theology module
Mission:

Renewing minds and changing
lives by purposefully guiding
people through a study of
historic and biblical Christian
theology.

Goal:

“Our goal is not so much to
teach good theology, as
important as that is, but to teach
people to think.”
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Introduction to Theology
module
What makes Introduction to Theology
Module different?
1. Intensity in studies
2. Irenic theology
3. Intentional program design
4. Comprehensive / Practical coverage
5. Doing theology in community (relevance)
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Intensity in Studies
The Church must have an avenue of intense,
interactive Christian education through a
program which gives people an opportunity to
learn at a level that other venues cannot
provide.
HOPE TRAINING CENTER endeavors to be
this avenue.
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Intensity in Studies

Sermon

Low Commitment

Fellowship/
Sunday School

Interactive Classroom

High Commitment
Intensity in Studies

Sermon

Fellowship/
Sunday School

Low Expectations

Interactive Classroom

High Expectations
•Attendance
•Assigned readings
•Books
•Papers
•Case studies
•Memorization of Scripture
•Grades

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Intensity in Studies

Fellowship/
Sunday School

Sermon

Devotional
(Brings encouragement for the week)

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.

Interactive Classroom

Foundational
(Builds theology for a lifetime)
Intensity in Studies

Sermon

Fellowship/
Sunday School

Short-term life change

Interactive Classroom

Long-term life change

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Intensity in Studies

Sermon

Fellowship/
Sunday School

Exhortation

Interactive Classroom

Education

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Intensity in Studies

Sermon

Fellowship/
Sunday School

Interactive Classroom

The education program of the
Church needs to include all of
these in balance.
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Irenic Theology
Key Terms
Irenic Theology:
Polemic Theology:

Apologetic Theology:

Theology that is done peaceably,
accurately representing all views,
even when you oppose them.
Theology that is done in a warlike
manner inside the Church,
speaking against those with
whom there is disagreement.
Theology that is done to defend
the faith against those who
oppose outside the church.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Irenic Theology
Irenic
Peace

War

Polemic

Defense

Apologetic
Intentional Program Design
Comprehensive Coverage
In the courses, we will address all the relevant
major issues, current and historic, of which we
think people need to be aware.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Doing Theology in a
Community
We believe that truth is not found in Spiritilluminated individuals, but in a community of
Spirit-illuminated individuals. Therefore, we
believe that the Body of Christ, must come
together to understand theology, clarifying it
from many perspectives and differing
experiences, and applying theology in the
community.
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Discussion Groups

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
“What does it mean to ‘do’
theology?”

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question

What is theology?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Traditions of Theology
Epistemology
Epistemology

Denominations

Eastern Orthodox
Eastern Orthodox
Pluralism
Protestant

Experience

Cessationism

Relativism

PENTECOSTALI
SM

Truth

Roman Catholic
Roman Catholic
Exclusivism
Special Revelation
Special Revelation

Modernism

Prophecy

Protestant theology

Postmodernism

Cessationism
Defining Theology
What is Theology?
Write a one or two sentence definition of
theology:

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
“The study or science
“The study or science
of God.”
of God.”
–Millard Erickson
–Millard Erickson
Christian Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2001), 22

Christian Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2001), 22

“The Science of God
“The Science of God
and of the relations
and of the relations
between God and
between God and
the universe.”
the universe.”
–A. H. Strong
–A. H. Strong

“Rational discussion
“Rational discussion
respecting the deity.”
respecting the deity.”
–Augustine
–Augustine
“Thinking about God
“Thinking about God
and expressing those
and expressing those
thoughts in some
thoughts in some
way.”
way.”
–Charles Ryrie
–Charles Ryrie

Basic Theology (Wheaton, IL: 1986), 99
Basic Theology (Wheaton, IL: 1986),

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
“The science of God or of religion; the science which
“The science of God or of religion; the science which
treats of the existence, character, and attributes of
treats of the existence, character, and attributes of
God, his laws and government, the doctrines we are
God, his laws and government, the doctrines we are
to believe, and the duties we are to practice; divinity;
to believe, and the duties we are to practice; divinity;
(as more commonly understood) the knowledge
(as more commonly understood) the knowledge
derivable from the Scriptures, the systematic exhibition of
derivable from the Scriptures, the systematic exhibition of
revealed truth, the science of Christian faith and life.”
revealed truth, the science of Christian faith and life.”
—Webster’s Dictionary
—Webster’s Dictionary
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question

Who is a theologian?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
Who is a theologian?
Anyone who has asked the ultimate questions of life:
• Why am I here?
• What is life?
• What happens after death?
• What is the difference between right and
wrong?
• Why is there something instead of nothing?
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
The question is not, “Who is a
The question is not, “Who is a
theologian?” but “What kind of
theologian?” but “What kind of
theologian am II going to be?” Are
theologian am going to be?” Are
you going to be a good theologian
you going to be a good theologian
or a bad theologian? This is a
or a bad theologian? This is a
more accurate question because,
more accurate question because,
as one writer put it, “not all
as one writer put it, “not all
theologies are equal.”
theologies are equal.”
–Source unknown
–Source unknown

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
“We live in what may be the most anti“We live in what may be the most antiintellectual period in the history of
intellectual period in the history of
Western civilization. .. .. We must have
Western civilization. We must have
passion—indeed hearts on fire for the
passion—indeed hearts on fire for the
things of God. But that passion must
things of God. But that passion must
resist with intensity the antiresist with intensity the antiintellectual spirit of the world.”
intellectual spirit of the world.”
—R. C. Sproul
—R. C. Sproul

“Burning Hearts Are Not Nourished by Empty Heads,” Christianity Today 26 (Sept. 3, 1982), 100
“Burning Hearts Are Not Nourished by Empty Heads,” Christianity Today 26 (Sept. 3, 1982), 100

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
There are basically six arenas in which
we can do theology:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Tabloid Theology
Folk Theology
Lay Theology
Ministerial Theology
Professional Theology
Academic Theology
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology

Tabloid

Folk

Lay

Ministerial

Fundamental

Academic
Defining Theology
Tabloid Theologian: One who constructs his or
her theology based upon
naïve hearsay information
that has no basis in fact and
very little, if any, evidence
to be believed. Many times
people are Tabloid
theologians because of the
theology’s appearance of
originality. As well, it can
be “cutting edge” in many
people’s minds.
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
What are some examples of Tabloid
theology?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
• Tabloid theology examples

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
•
•
•
•
•
•

Hitchhiking angel
Growing fire hose
“I Saw Heaven”
Statues with tears of blood
Apparitions of Mary
(what other examples can you give?)

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
Folk Theologian: One who uncritically
and unreflectively
constructs his or her
theology according to
traditions and religious
folklore. The Folk
theologian is often very
dogmatic about his or
her beliefs.
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
What are some examples of Folk
theology?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
Folk theology examples:

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
Folk theology examples:

•
•
•
•
•

Occults; Espiritistas
Ghosts
Angels’ wings
Good works salvation
All people are good at heart

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
Folk theology examples:
•
Amulets
•
Talismans
•
Witch Doctors
•
Divination
•
Ghosts
•
Animism
•
(give your own examples)

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
Why do you think that it is so hard for
Folk theologians to learn?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
Lay Theologian:

A layperson who constructs his
or her theology and who, unlike
the folk and tabloid theologian,
is . . .
(1) more reflective upon learned
theological concepts
(2) likely to formulate a system
of beliefs which distinguishes
between essential and nonessential doctrine
(3) more critical of unfounded
traditions
(4) willing to use study tools

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
Ministerial Theologian: A layperson who constructs his
or her theology and who, unlike
the lay theologian is . . .
(1) educated in theological
methodology
(2) able to use study tools and
resources at a more effective
level
(3) able to openly critique
personal theology against
competing models
(4) intent on devoting more time
to reflection so that theological
integration can take place
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
Fundamental Theologian:

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.

One who constructs his
or her theology seriously
and fundamentally. They
usually. . .
(1) are didactically
purposed toward lay and
pastoral theologians
(2) conduct practical
original research
(3) critically evaluate
common theological
trends and folk theology.
Defining Theology
Fundamental theologians are often
accused of “quenching the Spirit.” Why
do you think they receive this
accusation?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
• BECAUSE THEY WILL USUALLY ASK
THE QUESTIONS:
• Is that Biblical?
• Where in the Bible can you find that?
• Is it Theological?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
Academic Theologian: A professional theologian
who constructs his
theology with an overly
speculative and critical
spirit. His dialogue can
usually come only with
other theologians. It is
often called “Ivory
Tower theology.”

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
What are some examples of
Academic theology?
Why do you think someone would
want to be an Academic theologian?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
Skeptical

Naïve

Critical
Gates permanently locked

Sensational
Gates wide open
Tabloid

Folk

Lay

Ministerial

Fundamental

Academic
Defining Theology

Acceptable range
Tabloid

Folk

Lay

Ministerial

Professional

Academic
Defining Theology
“Theology is for everyone. Indeed,
“Theology is for everyone. Indeed,
everyone needs to be a theologian. In
everyone needs to be a theologian. In
reality, everyone is a theologian—of one
reality, everyone is a theologian—of one
sort or another. And therein lies the
sort or another. And therein lies the
problem. There is nothing wrong with
problem. There is nothing wrong with
being an amateur theologian or a
being an amateur theologian or a
professional theologian, but there is
professional theologian, but there is
everything wrong with being an ignorant
everything wrong with being an ignorant
or sloppy theologian.”
or sloppy theologian.”
—Charles Ryrie
—Charles Ryrie

Basic Theology (Wheaton, IL: 1986), 9.
Basic Theology (Wheaton, IL: 1986), 9.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
How do we “do” theology every day?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
How do we “do” theology every day? In other
words, how does our theology influence our
daily routine?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

When we think about God.
When we share the Gospel.
When we interpret the Bible.
When we get sick.
When we defend the faith.
When we plan for the future.
When we choose schooling for our children.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
8. When we vote.
9. When we attempt to deal with sin in our
lives.
10. When we decide on who we marry.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology
What is theology?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Theology

credo ut intelligam
“faith seeking understanding”
This is aaLatin phrase coined by Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109)
This is Latin phrase coined by Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109)
meaning “faith seeking understanding.” This is one of the earliest
meaning “faith seeking understanding.” This is one of the earliest
definitions of theology. It starts with the assumption that we are
definitions of theology. It starts with the assumption that we are
believers and, as such, we are seeking to understand our beliefs better.
believers and, as such, we are seeking to understand our beliefs better.
Discussion Groups

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Categories of
Theology

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question

What are the different categories of
theology?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Categories of Theology
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Systematic
Biblical
Historical
Philosophical
Creedal/Dogmatic
Apologetic

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Categories of Theology
Systematic Theology
•

Prolegomena:
Literally means “things which are spoken
beforehand.” Deals with the foundational
issues of theology such as theological
methodology, sources, and reasons for the
study of theology.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Categories of Theology
•

•

Bibliology:
The study of the nature, transmission,
canonization, and purpose of Scripture.
Theology Proper:
The study of God’s existence, nature, and
attributes. Sometimes called
“Trinitarianism.”

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Categories of Theology
•

•

Christology:
The study of the person and work of
Christ.
Pneumatology:
The study of the person and work of the
Holy Spirit.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Categories of Theology
•

•

•

Anthropology:
The study of the purpose and nature of
humanity, both in its pre-fall and post-fall state.
Hamartiology:
The study of the nature, origin, and effects of sin
on all creation.
Angelology:
The study of the nature and works of demons
and angels.
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Categories of Theology
•
•
•

Soteriology:
The study of salvation.
Ecclesiology:
The study of the nature of the Church.
Eschatology:
The study of the end times.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Categories of Theology
Systematic

Biblical
•

Restricts the formulation of theology
only to the Scripture.

•

Formulates theology from all sources of
theology, including Scripture.

•

Sometimes will examine the individual
parts of Scripture in order to formulate a
particular theology that is restricted to a
certain time period and a particular people
(e.g., Pre-mosaic theology).

•

Correlates the entirety of Scripture to
formulate a general theology for all
time and for all people.

•

Sometimes examines the theology of a
certain author (e.g.,, John or Paul).

•

Correlates information on a doctrine
by examining the theology of all the
authors.
Categories of Theology
Systematic

Historical
•

Restricts the formulation of theology
only to the history of the Church.

•

Formulates theology from all sources of
theology.

•

Sometimes will examine the individual
periods of Church history in order to
formulate a particular theology that is
restricted to a certain time period (e.g.,,
Patristic, Medieval, Reformation).

•

Correlates the all of Church history to
formulate a general theology for all
time and for all people.
Categories of Theology
Systematic

Philosophical
•

Restricts the formulation of theology
only to that which can be ascertained by
reason.

•

Formulates theology from all sources of
theology.

•

Sometimes will examine the individual
periods of philosophical history in order
to formulate a particular theology that
is restricted to a certain time period (e.g.,,
enlightenment, modern,
postmodern).

•

Correlates the all of philosophical history
to formulate a general theology for all
time and for all people.
Categories of Theology
Creedal

Systematic

• Restricts the formulation of • Formulates theology from
all sources of theology
theology only to that of a
including the creedal
particular religious institution
statement of many
or denomination.
institutions and
denominations.
Categories of Theology
Apologetic
• Formulates theology for
the purpose of explaining
and defending the faith to
those outside the faith.

Systematic
• Formulates theology for
the purpose of creating a
comprehensive and
coherent understanding of
various doctrines.
Question

What is the Theological Process?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Truth
Extract timeless
principles

2 Theological Statement

“What is the timeless truth taught?”

.

“What did it mean then?”
•
•
•
•

Historical interpretation
Grammatical interpretation
Contextual interpretation
Literary Interpretation

Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

1 Exegetical Statement

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time bound Audience

Contextualize
Contextualize
Principles for today
Principles for today

Analogy
of Scripture

.

3 Homiletical Statement
.

“How does it apply to us?”
Systematic
Theology

Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

Biblical
Hermeneutics

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience

Application
Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

?

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience
Liberal Theology
Liberal Theology

Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

?

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience
?
Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience
Hypocritical Folk Theology
Hypocritical Folk Theology

?
Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience
Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience

?
Subjective Theology
Subjective Theology

Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience

?
Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

?

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience

?
Irrelevant Theology
Irrelevant Theology

Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

?

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience

?
?
Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience

?
?
Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience
Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

Contemporary Audience

Folk Theology
Folk Theology

?
?
Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

?

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience
Short-circuit Theology
Short-circuit Theology

?
Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

?

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience
?
Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

?

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience

?
Eisegetical Theology
Eisegetical Theology

?
Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

?

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience

?
?
Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

?

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience

?
Exegetical Theology
Exegetical Theology

?
Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

?

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience

?
•
•
•
•

Historical interpretation
Grammatical interpretation
Contextual interpretation
Literary Interpretation

Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

1. Exegetical Statement
“What did it mean then?”

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience

Contextualize
Contextualize
Principles for today
Principles for today

Analogy
of Scripture

Theology

3. Homiletical Statement
“How does it apply to us?”
Categories of Theology

Scripture
Biblical Theology
Historical Theology
Philosophical Theology

Systematic Theology
Apologetic Theology

Creedal/Dogmatic Theology
Postmodern
Epistemology
Understanding Our
Changing Culture

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Postmodern Epistemology

What is Epistemology?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Postmodern Epistemology
“The theory or science
“The theory or science
of the method or
of the method or
grounds of
grounds of
knowledge.”
knowledge.”
—Webster’s Dictionary
—Webster’s Dictionary

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Postmodern Epistemology
“The branch of philosophy
“The branch of philosophy
that is concerned with the
that is concerned with the
theory of knowledge. It is
theory of knowledge. It is
an inquiry into the nature
an inquiry into the nature
and source of knowledge,
and source of knowledge,
the bounds of knowledge,
the bounds of knowledge,
and the justification of
and the justification of
claims to knowledge.”
claims to knowledge.”
—Paul Feinberg
—Paul Feinberg

Walter A. Elwell ed., “Epistemology” in The Evangelical Dictionary of Theology
Walter A. Elwell ed., “Epistemology” in The Evangelical Dictionary of Theology
(Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2001), 382.
(Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2001), 382.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Postmodern Epistemology
Key Terms
Relativism:
Subjectivism:
Skepticism:
Perspectivism:
Pragmatism:
Objectivism:

The belief that all truth is relative, being determined
by some group.
The belief that all truth is subjective, being defined by
the perspective of the individual.
The belief that truth cannot be known with certainty.
The belief that truth is found in the combined
perspectives of many.
The belief that truth is ultimately defined by that which
works to accomplish the best outcome. “The end
justifies the means.”
The belief that truth is an objective reality that exist
whether someone believes it or not.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Postmodern Epistemology
Which best describes our culture
today?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Relativism
Subjectivism
Skepticism
Perspectivalism
Pragmatism
Objectivism
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Postmodern Epistemology
Which is true?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Relativism
Subjectivism
Skepticism
Perspectivalism
Pragmatism
Objectivism

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question

What is Postmodernism?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Postmodern Epistemology
“Christian’s today cannot work with the
“Christian’s today cannot work with the
same assumptions that we did just 20
same assumptions that we did just 20
years ago. At that time, people would
years ago. At that time, people would
join you in your search for absolute
join you in your search for absolute
truth. It is different now. Today, before
truth. It is different now. Today, before
we begin to lead people to the truth of
we begin to lead people to the truth of
Jesus Christ, we may have to lead them
Jesus Christ, we may have to lead them
to the truth of truth. Common ground
to the truth of truth. Common ground
must be created before the Gospel can be
must be created before the Gospel can be
proclaimed”
proclaimed”
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Postmodern Epistemology
“Apologetically, the question which arises in
“Apologetically, the question which arises in
the postmodern context is the following. How
the postmodern context is the following. How
can Christianity’s claims to truth be taken
can Christianity’s claims to truth be taken
seriously, when there are so many rival
seriously, when there are so many rival
alternatives, and when ‘truth’ itself has
alternatives, and when ‘truth’ itself has
become a devalued notion? No-one can lay
become a devalued notion? No-one can lay
claim to possession of truth. It is all a
claim to possession of truth. It is all a
question of perspective. The conclusion of
question of perspective. The conclusion of
this line of thought is as simple as it is
this line of thought is as simple as it is
devastating: ‘the truth is that there is no
devastating: ‘the truth is that there is no
truth”
truth”
–Alister McGrath
–Alister McGrath

A Passion for Truth (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 1996), 188
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved. for Truth (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 1996), 188
A Passion
Postmodern Epistemology
A Conversation Between Protagoras and
Socrates (4th Century B.C.)
Protagoras: Truth is relative. It is only a matter
of opinion.
Socrates: You mean that truth is mere subjective
opinion?
Protagoras: Exactly. What is true for you is true
for you, and what is true for me is true for me.
Truth is subjective.
Socrates: Do you really mean that? That my opinion
is true by virtue of its being my opinion?
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Postmodern Epistemology
Protagoras: Indeed I do.
Socrates: My opinion is: Truth is absolute, not opinion,
and that you, Mr. Protagoras, are absolutely in error.
Since this is my opinion, you must grant that it is true
according to your philosophy.
Protagoras: You are quite correct, Socrates.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Postmodern Epistemology
Self-defeating Statements
“I cannot speak a word in English.”
“My wife has never been married.”
“We cannot know anything about God.”
“There is no such thing as truth.”
“Truth cannot be known with certainty.”

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Postmodern Epistemology
A short history of western civilization
Three periods:
1. Premodern (400-1600 A.D.)
2. Modern (1600-1900 A.D.)
3. Postmodern (1960-present)

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Postmodern Epistemology

Premodern
400

Modern
1600

Postmodern
1960
Postmodern Epistemology
Back

Stage of Truth
Stage of Truth

Front
Postmodern Epistemology

Postmodern
Postmodern

Modern
Modern

Transition
1960-?
Postmodern Epistemology
Modern Generation
– Preboomers
– Boomers

53%
53%

Postmodern Generation
– Busters (Gen X)
– Bridgers (Gen Y)
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.

57%
57%
Postmodern Epistemology
Modernism
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Intellectual
Reason
Optimism
Hope for the future
Objectivism
Exclusivism
Science method
Man is evolving

Postmodernism
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Anti-intellectual
Feeling
Pessimism
Despair for the present
Subjectivism/relativism
Pluralism/inclusivism
Distrust in science
Man is devolving
Postmodern Epistemology
The Ideal Modern Man:

Mr. Spock

• Spock is always logical and
objective.
• Never acts upon feeling,
because that would be
“illogical.”
“Physical laws simply cannot
be ignored. Existence cannot
be without them.”
“Pain is a thing of the mind.
The mind can be controlled.”
Postmodern Epistemology
The Ideal Modern Man Mocked:

Data

•
•

Data is the “perfect”
modern human.
Despite his
“perfection,” Data . . .
1. Wants to be human.
2. Rebels against logic.
3. Attempts to develop
emotions and feelings
Postmodern Epistemology
• Premodern: “There’s balls and
Premodern
there’s strikes, and I call them as
they are.”
• Modern: “There’s balls and
Modern
there’s strikes, and I call them as
I see them.”
• Postmodern: “They ain’t
Postmodern
nothing ‘til I call ‘em.”
Postmodern Epistemology
“In Postmodernism, there is no
“In Postmodernism, there is no
objective, universal truth; there is
objective, universal truth; there is
only the perspective of the group. .. .. ..
only the perspective of the group.
In postmodernism, all viewpoints, all
In postmodernism, all viewpoints, all
lifestyles, all beliefs and behaviors
lifestyles, all beliefs and behaviors
are regarded as equally valid. .. .. ..
are regarded as equally valid.
Tolerance has become so important
Tolerance has become so important
that no exception is tolerated.”
that no exception is tolerated.”
–Charles Colson
–Charles Colson

How Now Shall We Live? (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale, 1999), 23
How Now Shall We Live? (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale, 1999), 23

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian
Epistemology

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question
What questions are postmoderns
asking?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
Modernist Objections to Christianity
1. What about all the contradictions?
2. God is just a crutch. Religion was invented by
man.
3. Jesus was just a man.
4. The Bible we have today is not the same as when
it was written 2000 years ago.
5. I don’t believe in what I can’t see.
6. Evolution has proven Christianity to be wrong.
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
7. The Bible is a myth full of fairy tales.
8. How did Noah get all of the animals on the
Ark?
9. There are no such thing as miracles.
10. Do you really believe in the story of Adam
and Eve?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
Postmodernist Objections to Christianity
1. If God exists, why is there evil?
2. The Inquisition and the Crusades show that
Christianity is oppressive.
3. Christianity is a way to God but not the only
way.
4. Christianity is arrogant and exclusive.
5. How do you know that your Bible is better than
other religious writings?
6. Why does God allow bad things to happen to
good people?
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
7. What about those who have never heard?
8. The church is full of hypocrites.
9. Why would God send anyone to Hell?
10. The God of the OT is cruel, partial, and
unjust.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology

Modernist
Facts
Rationality
Evidence

Postmodernis
t
Fairness
Relationships
Emotion

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question
What is the modern view of truth?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
Correspondence view of truth: (1) Truth
is an objective reality that exists whether
someone believes it or not, (2) and that
objective reality is grounded in nature.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
True statements are those which correspond
to that objective reality.
False statements are those which do not
correspond to that objective reality.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
Law of non-contradiction applies
 

A ≠ -A
at the same time and in the same relationship.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Epistemology

Key Motto
Key Motto

“Man can and will know all truth.”
“Man can and will know all truth.”

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question
What is the postmodern view of
truth?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
Relative view of truth: (1) Truth is a
perspective reality that exists in the
perspective of the individual or group, (2) and
that perspective reality is grounded in time.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
Law of non-contradiction does not
apply

A = -A
at the same time and in the same relationship.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology

Key Motto
Key Motto

“The truth cannot be known.”
“The truth cannot be known.”

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
Religious Spin on Postmodern Epistemology
Universalism:
The belief that all people, good or
bad, will eventually make it to
Heaven.
Pluralism:
The belief that there are many ways
to God that are equally valid.
Syncretism:
The assimilation of differing beliefs
and practices.
Inclusivism:
The belief that salvation is only
through Christ, but Christ may be
revealed in other religions.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
Vatican II (1962-1965) and inclusivism
“But the plan of salvation also includes those who
acknowledge the creator. In the first place among
these there are the Moslems, whom professing to
hold the faith of Abraham, along with us adore the
one and merciful god, who on the last day will
judge mankind. Those also can attain salvation who
through no fault of their own do not know the
gospel of Christ or his church, yet sincerely seek
god and, moved by grace, strive by their deeds to
do his will as it is known to them through the
dictates of conscience.”
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question
What is the Christian view truth?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
Correspondence view of truth: (1) Truth
is an objective reality that exists whether
someone believes it or not, (2) and that
objective reality is grounded in an eternal
God.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
The law of non-contradiction is a
foundational necessity to all truth.
God cannot even violate this principle since it is a
logical impossibility.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
Key Motto
Key Motto
“The secret things belong to the Lord
“The secret things belong to the Lord
our God, but the things revealed
our God, but the things revealed
belong to us and to our sons forever, that
belong to us and to our sons forever, that
we may observe all the words of this law”
we may observe all the words of this law”
(Deut. 29:29).
(Deut. 29:29).

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
Christian truth must have a balance
between the “things revealed” and
mystery (“secret things”).

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
Apophadic Theology:

Lit. “negative theology.”
Apophadic Theology emphasizes
mystery. Often called the “way of
negation” (via negativa) or
“negative theology,” apophadic
theology sees God, and much of
theology, as beyond our
understanding and, therefore,
beyond defining through positive
assertations. Finite people cannot
say what the infinite God is but
only what He is not. God is
“uncreated,” “immutable,”
“infinite,” “immortal.”

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
Cataphatic Theology:

Lit. “affirmative theology.”
Cataphatic Theology
emphasizes revelation. Often
called “positive theology,”
cataphatic theology seeks to
understand God in positive
terms, understanding that
God communicates to us
through language and
concepts that are analogous
to who and what He truly is
(“analogy of language”).

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
Cataphatic Theology Apophatic Theology
“things revealed”

“secret things”

Modernism
West
Rationalists
Roman Catholic/Protestants

Postmodernism
East
Mystics
Eastern Orthodox

Responsible theology
Christian Epistemology
Objectivism

Cataphatic
Theology

Perspicuity

Prov. 23:23

Apophatic
Theology

Soft Skepticism

Perspectivism

Prov. 8:5

Prov. 12:15
Christian Epistemology
Objectivism
Prov. 23:23

Perspicuity

“You who are naive,
“You who are naive,
discern wisdom!
discern wisdom!
And you fools,
And you fools,
understand
understand
discernment!”
discernment!”
Cataphatic
Theology

Apophatic
Theology

Soft Skepticism

Perspectivism

Prov. 8:5

Prov. 12:15

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
Objectivism
Prov. 23:23

““The way of aa fool is
The way of fool is

Perspicuity

Cataphatic
Theology

right in his own
right in his own
opinion, but the one who
opinion, but the one who
listens to advice is
listens to advice is
Apophatic
wise.”
wise.”
Theology

Soft Skepticism

Perspectivism

Prov. 8:5

Prov. 12:15

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Christian Epistemology
Objectivism
Prov. 23:23

Cataphatic
Theology

Perspicuity

“Acquire truth
“Acquire truth
and do not sell it ..
and do not sell it
.. .”
.”
Apophatic
Theology

Soft Skepticism

Perspectivism

Prov. 8:5

Prov. 12:15

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Defining Essentials
and Non-essentials

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question
What truths are relative and what
truths are objective?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Essentials and Non-Essentials
Discussion of paper “Representing
Christ to a Postmodern World”

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Essentials and Non-essentials
Quadrant of Objectivity

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
True Relativity

True Objectivity
True Relativity
Drinking a
Drinking a
glass of
glass of
wine/beer
wine/beer

Going to
Going to
the
the
movies
movies

Situational
Situational
Relativity
Relativity
Wearing
Wearing
aa head
head
covering
covering

Eating
Eating
meat
meat
sacrificed
sacrificed
to idols
to idols

Home
Home
schooling
schooling

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.

True Objectivity
True Relativity
Drinking a
Drinking a
glass of
glass of
wine/beer
wine/beer

Going to
Going to
the
the
movies
movies

Situational
Situational
Relativity
Relativity
Wearing
Wearing
aa head
head
covering
covering

Home
Home
schooling
schooling

Eating
Eating
meat
meat
sacrificed
sacrificed
to idols
to idols

Best kind of
Best kind of
food
food

Coke or
Coke or
Pepsi
Pepsi

Autonomous
Autonomous
Relativity
Relativity
Church
Church
music
music

Temperature
Temperature
of aa room (hot
of room (hot
or cold)
or cold)

Best song
Best song

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.

True Objectivity
True Relativity

True Objectivity

Drinking a
Drinking a
glass of
glass of
wine/beer
wine/beer

Going to
Going to
the
the
movies
movies

Situational
Situational
Relativity
Relativity
Wearing
Wearing
aa head
head
covering
covering

Home
Home
schooling
schooling

Eating
Eating
meat
meat
sacrificed
sacrificed
to idols
to idols

Best kind of
Best kind of
food
food

Coke or
Coke or
Pepsi
Pepsi

Non-Essential
Non-Essential
Objectivity
Objectivity

Autonomous
Autonomous
Relativity
Relativity
Church
Church
music
music

Temperature
Temperature
of aa room (hot
of room (hot
or cold)
or cold)

Views of
Views of
Predestinatio
Predestinatio
nn

Date of
Date of
Christ’s
Christ’s
coming
coming

Best song
Best song

Young
Young
earth/Old
earth/Old
earth
earth

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.

Canon of
Canon of
Scripture
Scripture
Continuation
Continuation
of tongues
of tongues
True Relativity

True Objectivity

Drinking a
Drinking a
glass of
glass of
wine/beer
wine/beer

Going to
Going to
the
the
movies
movies

Situational
Situational
Relativity
Relativity
Wearing
Wearing
aa head
head
covering
covering

Essential
Essential
Objectivity
Objectivity
Home
Home
schooling
schooling

Eating
Eating
meat
meat
sacrificed
sacrificed
to idols
to idols

Best kind of
Best kind of
food
food

Coke or
Coke or
Pepsi
Pepsi

Non-Essential
Non-Essential
Objectivity
Objectivity

Autonomous
Autonomous
Relativity
Relativity
Church
Church
music
music

Temperature
Temperature
of aa room (hot
of room (hot
or cold)
or cold)

Views of
Views of
Predestinatio
Predestinatio
nn

Date of
Date of
Christ’s
Christ’s
coming
coming

Best song
Best song

Young
Young
earth/Old
earth/Old
earth
earth

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.

Canon of
Canon of
Scripture
Scripture
Continuation
Continuation
of tongues
of tongues
True Relativity

True Objectivity

Drinking a
Drinking a
glass of
glass of
wine/beer
wine/beer

Going to
Going to
the
the
movies
movies

Existence of
Existence of
God
God

Situational
Situational
Relativity
Relativity
Wearing
Wearing
aa head
head
covering
covering

Essential
Essential
Objectivity
Objectivity
Home
Home
schooling
schooling

Eating
Eating
meat
meat
sacrificed
sacrificed
to idols
to idols

Best kind of
Best kind of
food
food

Coke or
Coke or
Pepsi
Pepsi

Non-Essential
Non-Essential
Objectivity
Objectivity

Autonomous
Autonomous
Relativity
Relativity
Church
Church
music
music

Temperature
Temperature
of aa room (hot
of room (hot
or cold)
or cold)

Views of
Views of
Predestinatio
Predestinatio
nn

Date of
Date of
Christ’s
Christ’s
coming
coming

Best song
Best song

Young
Young
earth/Old
earth/Old
earth
earth

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.

Canon of
Canon of
Scripture
Scripture
Continuation
Continuation
of tongues
of tongues
True Relativity
Drinking a
Drinking a
glass of
glass of
wine/beer
wine/beer

Going to
Going to
the
the
movies
movies

True Objectivity

Situational
Situational
Relativity
Relativity
Wearing
Wearing
aa head
head
covering
covering

Essential
Essential
Objectivity
Objectivity
Home
Home
schooling
schooling

Eating
Eating
meat
meat
sacrificed
sacrificed
to idols
to idols

Best kind of
Best kind of
food
food

Coke or
Coke or
Pepsi
Pepsi

Temperature
Temperature
of aa room (hot
of room (hot
or cold)
or cold)

Views of
Views of
Predestinatio
Predestinatio
nn

Date of
Date of
Christ’s
Christ’s
coming
coming

Non-Essential
Non-Essential
Objectivity
Objectivity

Autonomous
Autonomous
Relativity
Relativity
Church
Church
music
music

Existence of
Existence of
God
God

Christ’s
Christ’s
deity
deity

Best song
Best song

Young
Young
earth/Old
earth/Old
earth
earth

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.

Canon of
Canon of
Scripture
Scripture
Continuation
Continuation
of tongues
of tongues
True Relativity
Drinking a
Drinking a
glass of
glass of
wine/beer
wine/beer

Going to
Going to
the
the
movies
movies

True Objectivity

Situational
Situational
Relativity
Relativity
Wearing
Wearing
aa head
head
covering
covering

Essential
Essential
Objectivity
Objectivity
Home
Home
schooling
schooling

Faith
Faith
alone
alone

Best kind of
Best kind of
food
food

Eating
Eating
meat
meat
sacrificed
sacrificed
to idols
to idols

Coke or
Coke or
Pepsi
Pepsi

Date of
Date of
Christ’s
Christ’s
coming
coming

Temperature
Temperature
of aa room (hot
of room (hot
or cold)
or cold)

Views of
Views of
Predestinatio
Predestinatio
nn

Non-Essential
Non-Essential
Objectivity
Objectivity

Autonomous
Autonomous
Relativity
Relativity
Church
Church
music
music

Existence of
Existence of
God
God

Christ’s
Christ’s
deity
deity

Best song
Best song

Young
Young
earth/Old
earth/Old
earth
earth

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.

Canon of
Canon of
Scripture
Scripture
Continuation
Continuation
of tongues
of tongues
True Relativity
Drinking a
Drinking a
glass of
glass of
wine/beer
wine/beer

Going to
Going to
the
the
movies
movies

True Objectivity

Situational
Situational
Relativity
Relativity
Wearing
Wearing
aa head
head
covering
covering

Essential
Essential
Objectivity
Objectivity
Home
Home
schooling
schooling

Faith
Faith
alone
alone

Best kind of
Best kind of
food
food

Eating
Eating
meat
meat
sacrificed
sacrificed
to idols
to idols

Coke or
Coke or
Pepsi
Pepsi

Date of
Date of
Christ’s
Christ’s
coming
coming

Temperature
Temperature
of aa room (hot
of room (hot
or cold)
or cold)

Death,
Death,
burial, and
burial, and
resurrection
resurrection
of Christ
of Christ

Views of
Views of
Predestinatio
Predestinatio
nn

Non-Essential
Non-Essential
Objectivity
Objectivity

Autonomous
Autonomous
Relativity
Relativity
Church
Church
music
music

Existence of
Existence of
God
God

Christ’s
Christ’s
deity
deity

Best song
Best song

Young
Young
earth/Old
earth/Old
earth
earth

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.

Canon of
Canon of
Scripture
Scripture
Continuation
Continuation
of tongues
of tongues
True Relativity
Drinking a
Drinking a
glass of
glass of
wine/beer
wine/beer

Going to
Going to
the
the
movies
movies

True Objectivity

Situational
Situational
Relativity
Relativity
Wearing
Wearing
aa head
head
covering
covering

Essential
Essential
Objectivity
Objectivity
Home
Home
schooling
schooling

Faith
Faith
alone
alone

Best kind of
Best kind of
food
food

Eating
Eating
meat
meat
sacrificed
sacrificed
to idols
to idols

Coke or
Coke or
Pepsi
Pepsi

Date of
Date of
Christ’s
Christ’s
coming
coming

Temperature
Temperature
of aa room (hot
of room (hot
or cold)
or cold)

Death,
Death,
burial, and
burial, and
resurrection
resurrection
of Christ
of Christ

The
The
atonemen
atonemen
tt

Views of
Views of
Predestinatio
Predestinatio
nn

Non-Essential
Non-Essential
Objectivity
Objectivity

Autonomous
Autonomous
Relativity
Relativity
Church
Church
music
music

Existence of
Existence of
God
God

Christ’s
Christ’s
deity
deity

Best song
Best song

Young
Young
earth/Old
earth/Old
earth
earth

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.

Canon of
Canon of
Scripture
Scripture
Continuation
Continuation
of tongues
of tongues
Essentials and Non-Essentials
Where would you place these on the
quadrant?
1. Belief in the doctrine of the Trinity? Why?
2. Smoking? Why?
3. Eating healthy and exercising? Why?
4. Getting intoxicated? Why?
5. Having your mind altered by antidepressants? Why?
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question
What truths are essential for
orthodoxy?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Essentials and Non-essentials
Concentric Circle of Importance

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Pure Speculation
Not Important
Important, but
Not Essential
Essential for
Orthodoxy
Essential for
Salvation
Essentials and Non-essentials

“For the Christian, beliefs
“For the Christian, beliefs
matter, but not all beliefs
matter, but not all beliefs
matter equally .”
matter equally .”
–Roger Olsen
–Roger Olsen

Mosaic of Christian Beliefs (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2002), 33
Mosaic of Christian Beliefs (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2002), 33

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question
How certain are you
about your beliefs?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Essentials and Non-essentials
“There are those dogmatic Christians
“There are those dogmatic Christians
who seem to overdefine Christianity
who seem to overdefine Christianity
such that being authentically
such that being authentically
Christian includes (for them) firm
Christian includes (for them) firm
adherence to a detailed set of
adherence to a detailed set of
extrabiblical beliefs, some of which
extrabiblical beliefs, some of which
are quite outside the Great Tradition
are quite outside the Great Tradition
itself.”
itself.”
–Roger Olsen
–Roger Olsen
Mosaic of Christian Beliefs (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2002), 33

Mosaic of Christian Beliefs (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2002), 33

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Essentials and non-essentials
“Certain” (Webster’s)
– Definite; fixed.
– Sure to come or happen; inevitable.
– Established beyond doubt or question;
indisputable.
– Capable of being relied on; dependable.
– Having or showing confidence; assured.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
The Existence of God
Types of Certainty
1.Mathematical certainty (scientific method)
2.Empirical certainty (weight of evidences)
3.Logical certainty (what is reasonable)
4.Moral certainty (what is demanded)

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Essentials and Non-essentials
Chart of Certainty

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Essentials and non-essentials

Chart of
Certainty
I Do not
believe

I believe

1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91
0
0

–

+
Essentials and non-essentials
How certain are you that . . .
1.
There is a God?
2.
That Christ rose from the grave?
3.
That God loves you?
4.
That Christ is going to come and Rapture the Church before the Great Tribulaton?
5.
That Christ is coming back to reign on the earth for a thousand years?
6.
That Christ is coming back?
7.
That God wants you to trust that He will protect you from all physical harm?
8.
That God wants you to trust that He will protect you from all emotional harm?
9.
That God wants you to trust in Him in every circumstance?
10.
That the Bible does not have any historical errors?
11.
That Adam and Eve were real people?
12.
That there was really a snake in the garden?
13.
That God created the earth in seven literal days?
14.
The God created the earth?
15.
That Christ paid for the sins of all mankind?
16.
That Christ died for you?
17.
That the Apocrypha (15 books in the Roman Catholic Bible) should not be included in Scripture?
18.
That the book of 3 John should be included in Scripture?
19.
That the book of Genesis should be included in Scripture?
20.
That the gift of tongues ceased in the first century?
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Essentials and Non-essentials
“When you overstate, readers will be
“When you overstate, readers will be
instantly on guard and everything that
instantly on guard and everything that
has preceded your overstatement as well as
has preceded your overstatement as well as
everything that follows it will be suspect in
everything that follows it will be suspect in
their minds because they have lost
their minds because they have lost
confidence in your judgment or your poise.
confidence in your judgment or your poise.
Overstatement is one of the common faults.
Overstatement is one of the common faults.
A single overstatement, wherever or however
A single overstatement, wherever or however
it occurs, diminishes the whole, and a
it occurs, diminishes the whole, and a
single carefree superlative has the power to
single carefree superlative has the power to
destroy, for readers, the object of your
destroy, for readers, the object of your
enthusiasm.”
enthusiasm.”
–Strunk and White
–Strunk and White

Elements of Style, (Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon), 7.
Elements of Style, (Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon), 7.
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Essentials and Non-Essentials

“In essentials unity, in
“In essentials unity, in
non-essentials liberty,
non-essentials liberty,
in all things charity.”
in all things charity.”
–Rupertus Meldenius
–Rupertus Meldenius

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Essentials and Non-essentials
Guiding Principles and Application:
Application
1. Don’t divide over non-essentials no matter how
convicted you are about their truth.
2. Never compromise the essentials no matter what
the consequence.
3. There is no shame in being less certain about
some things than others. The Bible does not
teach all things with the same clarity.
4. Showing honest uncertainty about difficult issues
makes your witness more authentic and
powerful to a postmodern world.
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Traditions in
Christian Theology

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question
What is the essential difference in
Roman Catholicism, Eastern
Orthodoxy, and Protestantism?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Traditions in Theology
Traditions in Christian Theology
1. Roman Catholic
2. Eastern Orthodox
3. Protestant

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Traditions in Theology

Protestant
Roman Catholic
Orthodox

349 million
943 million
211 million

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question
What is the Protestant view of
Church history?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Protestant View of Ecclesiastical History
Formulation

Gospel
100 AD
500

Corruption

Loss of Gospel

Restoration
Protestant Church

1054

1200

Greek Orthodox

1500

Roman Catholic
Traditions in Theology
“Christianity stands or
“Christianity stands or
falls upon the doctrine
falls upon the doctrine
of justification.”
of justification.”
–Martin Luther
–Martin Luther
“Justification is the
“Justification is the
hinge upon which true
hinge upon which true
Christianity stands.”
Christianity stands.”
–John Calvin
–John Calvin
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question
What is the Roman Catholic view of
Church history?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Roman Catholic View of Ecclesiastical History
Formulation

Church
100 AD
500

Establishing

Corruption of Morals Restoration
Roman Catholicism

1054

1200

Greek Orthodox

1500

Protestants
Five Bishoprics of the Early
Church

Rome

Constantinople

Antioch

Jerusalem
Alexandria
Five Bishoprics of the Early
Church

Rome

Constantinople

Antioch

Jerusalem
Alexandria
Rome

Constantinople

Antioch

Invasion of Islam
Invasion of Islam
612
612

Jerusalem
Alexandria
Fight for Supremacy
Fight for Supremacy
Split
Split
1054
1054

Catholic
Rome
Catholic
Filioque
Filioque

Constantinople

Eastern Orthodox
Eastern Orthodox
Rome

Invasion of Islam
Invasion of Islam
1453
1453

Constantinople
Rome
Rome

Eastern Church moves north.
Eastern Church moves north.
Russian Orthodoxy becomes primary
Russian Orthodoxy becomes primary
Orthodox Church.
Orthodox Church.
Question
What is the Eastern Orthodox view
of Church history?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Eastern Orthodox View of Ecclesiastical History

Formulation

Church
100 AD

Disruption Purification
East
500
West

Eastern Orthodox
1500
1200
Roman Catholics

Protestants
Question

Why are there so many
Protestant denominations?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Traditions in Theology
Sub-traditions:
Sub-traditions
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

Reformed
Arminian
Liberal
Fundamental
Charismatic
Evangelical
Postmodernist

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Brief History of the Protestant Movement
Liberal Tradition

Reformed Tradition

s
an d
s s ri
an nist yte me sts
r i
er i
th alv resb efo apt
Lu C P R B

Charismatic Tradition
Fundamentalist Tradition

ts t
tis hris
s
ap
ts ns ll B of C stal es
is a i
n
od ley -w rch teco are
Arminian Tradition eth es ree hu en az
M W F C P N

1500

1700

1900

Evangelical Tradition
Postmodern Tradition

2000
Sources of
Theology
“Where do we go for truth?”

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question

What are the different sources of truth?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology
John Wesley’s Quadrilateral
Tradition

Scripture

Reason

Experience

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Tradition
Reason
Experience
General Revelation
Emotions
Special Revelation (Scripture)

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology
Sources of Theology
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Tradition
Reason
Experience
Emotions
General Revelation
Special Revelation
(Scripture)

Stage of Truth

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.

Back

Front
Roman Catholic
Back

Experience

General Revelation
Reason
Tradition Scripture
Front
Eastern Orthodox
Stage of Truth
Back

General Revelation

Experience
Tradition Scripture
Front
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Protestant Reformation
Stage of Truth
Back

Experience
General Revelation
Tradition

Reason

Scripture
Front
Liberal
Stage of Truth
Back

General Revelation
Emotions
Experience
Reason
Front
Charismatic
Stage of Truth
Back

Emotions
Experience
Special Revelation
Front
Fundamentalist Stage of
Truth
Back

General Revelation

Scripture
Front
Postmodern Stage of Truth
Back

Front
Question

What are the benefits and deficiencies of
each source?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology
Tradition:

Religious information that
has been handed down to us
from various sources.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology
Examples:
Benefits:
Deficiencies:

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology

“Tradition is the living faith of
“Tradition is the living faith of
those now dead. Traditionalism is
those now dead. Traditionalism is
the dead faith of those now living.”
the dead faith of those now living.”
–Jarislav Pelikan
–Jarislav Pelikan

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology
Reason:

Information that comes
through the human mind’s
capacity for logical,
rational, and analytic
thought.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology
Examples:
Benefits:
Deficiencies:

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology
“All truth is given by revelation,
“All truth is given by revelation,
either general or special, and it must
either general or special, and it must
be received by reason. Reason is the
be received by reason. Reason is the
God-given means for discovering the
God-given means for discovering the
truth that God discloses, whether in
truth that God discloses, whether in
his world or his Word. While God
his world or his Word. While God
wants to reach the heart with truth,
wants to reach the heart with truth,
he does not bypass the mind.”
he does not bypass the mind.”
–Jonathan Edwards
–Jonathan Edwards
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology
“The truth of the Christian
“The truth of the Christian
faith surpasses the capacity
faith surpasses the capacity
of reason.”
of reason.”
–Thomas Aquinas
–Thomas Aquinas

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology

credo quia absurdum
“I believe because it is absurd”
This Latin phrase coined by Tertullian (150-225) evidences some of the
This Latin phrase coined by Tertullian (150-225) evidences some of the
early Church’s disdain for the Greek philosophers’ reliance upon reason
early Church’s disdain for the Greek philosophers’ reliance upon reason
for truth. He said, “What does Athens have to do with Jerusalem, or the
for truth. He said, “What does Athens have to do with Jerusalem, or the
academy with the Church?” He sought to return the element of mystery
academy with the Church?” He sought to return the element of mystery
to the Christian faith.
to the Christian faith.
Sources of Theology
Experience:

Information that comes
through direct encounter,
participation, or
observation.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology
Examples:
Benefits:
Deficiencies:

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology
Emotions:

Information that comes
through subjectively
experienced psychological
feelings.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology
Examples:
Benefits:
Deficiencies:

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology

sensus divinitatus
“Sense of the divine”
The sensus divinitatus is the inward persuasion all people have that directs
The sensus divinitatus is the inward persuasion all people have that directs
them to aabelief in God and aapropensity to worship. While the sensus
them to belief in God and propensity to worship. While the sensus
divinitatas can contribute to and shape our theology (natural theology),
divinitatas can contribute to and shape our theology (natural theology),
the information is insufficient to bring aaperson into aaright relationship
the information is insufficient to bring person into right relationship
with God.
with God.
Sources of Theology
General Revelation: Revelation about God
given through the
created order
(Ps. 19:1–6 ;
Rom. 1:18–20;
2:14–15).

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology
Examples:
Benefits:
Deficiencies:

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology
Special Revelation: Revelation given by
God’s supernatural
intervention in
history through (1)
miraculous events,
(2) divine speech, and
(3) visible
manifestations.
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology
Examples:
Benefits:
Deficiencies:

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Sources of Theology

norma normans sed non normata
“A norm which norms but is not normed”
This is aaLatin phrase of the Protestant Reformation that stresses the
This is Latin phrase of the Protestant Reformation that stresses the
importance of Scripture above all other sources of theology. The
importance of Scripture above all other sources of theology. The
Scripture, according to the Reformers, is the standard (norm) against
Scripture, according to the Reformers, is the standard (norm) against
which all other sources for theology must be judged, but this standard
which all other sources for theology must be judged, but this standard
cannot be judged by them.
cannot be judged by them.
Proposed Stage of Truth
Back

Experience

Emotions

General Revelation
Tradition

Reason

Scripture
Front
Question

How do the different sources interact
to form our theology?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Tradition
Tradition

Reason
Reason

Emotions
Emotions

General Revelation
General Revelation

Experience
Experience

2 Theological Statement
.

“What is the timeless truth taught?”

.

“What did it mean then?”
•
•
•
•

Historical interpretation
Grammatical interpretation
Contextual interpretation
Literary Interpretation

Ancient Audience
Ancient Audience

1 Exegetical Statement

Contemporary Audience

Timeless Audience
Time-bound Audience

3 Homiletical Statement
.

“How does it apply to us?”
Subjectiv
e

Objectiv
e

•Tradition
•Reason
•Experience
•Emotions
•General Revelation
Acts 17:11
These Jews were more open-minded than those in
Thessalonica, for they eagerly received the message, examining
the Scriptures carefully every day to see if these things were so.
Excursus:
Does God still Speak Today?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
Has Special Revelation ceased, or does
God still communicate to people through
prophets, dreams, visions, and audible
encounters?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
Three positions:
1. Continuationism
2. Hard Cessationism
3. Soft Cessationism

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Temporary Gifts
Supernatural Sign

Permanent Gifts
Speaking

Confirmator
Revelatory
y
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Apostleship
•
Prophecy
•
Discerning of •
spirits
Word of
wisdom
Word of
knowledge
Tongues
Interpretation
of tongues

Healings
Miracles
Tongues

•
•
•
•

Evangelism
Teaching
Pastorteacher
Exhortation

Serving
•
•
•
•
•

Service
Showing Mercy
Giving
Administration
Helps
Question
What is the Continuationist view of
Prophecy?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
Continuationism: View that miraculous
sign gifts are still being
given and, therefore,
God still speaks directly
in various ways today.
Adherents:
Wayne Grudem, Jack
Deere, Craig Keener,
Jack Hayford
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
Defense of Continuationism:
Continuationism

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
1. Acts 2:14-21 seems to teach that
supernatural occurrences such as tongues
and prophecy would be normative for the
Church era.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
2. The entire book of Acts seems to show
that the supernatural gifts are common
within the Church.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
3. All of Scripture supports the idea that it is
God’s nature to work in supernatural
ways.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
4. The New Testament never explicitly states
that the supernatural sign gifts would
cease.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
“If you were to lock a
“If you were to lock a
brand-new Christian in a
brand-new Christian in a
room with a Bible and tell him
room with a Bible and tell him
to study what Scripture has to
to study what Scripture has to
say about healings and
say about healings and
miracles, he would never come
miracles, he would never come
out of the room a
out of the room a
cessationist.”
cessationist.”
–Jack Deere
–Jack Deere

Surprised by the Power of the Spirit (Grand Rapids, Mi: Zondervan, 1997), 54
(Grand Rapids, Mi: Zondervan, 1997), 54

Surprised by the Power rights reserved.
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. Allof the Spirit
Question
What is the Hard Cessationist
view of Prophecy?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
Hard Cessationism: View that miraculous sign
gifts ceased with the death of
the last apostle and the
completion of the New
Testament. Therefore, God
does not speak directly to
people today.
Adherents:
Charles Hodge, John
MacArthur, majority of
Church history
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
Defense of Hard Cessationism:
Cessationism

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
1. The Bible implicitly supports the idea that
the supernatural sign gifts were for the
establishment of the Church era.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
Eph. 2:19-20
“So then you are no longer foreigners and
noncitizens, but you are fellow citizens with
the saints and members of God’s household,
because you have been built on the foundation
of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus
himself as the cornerstone.”

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
2 Cor. 12:12
“Indeed, the signs of an apostle were
performed among you with great perseverance
by signs and wonders and powerful deeds.”

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
Heb. 2:3-4
“How will we escape if we neglect such a great
salvation? It was first communicated through
the Lord and was confirmed to us by those
who heard him, while God confirmed their
witness with signs and wonders and various
miracles and gifts of the Holy Spirit distributed
according to his will.”

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
1 Cor. 13:8-10
•“Love never ends. But if there are prophecies,
they will be set aside; if there are tongues,
they will cease; if there is knowledge, it will
be set aside. For we know in part and we
prophesy in part; but when the perfect comes,
the partial will be done away.”
”
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
2. It is agreed that the Bible never explicitly states
that the sign gifts have ceased. But the Bible
never explicitly states that Scripture is complete,
yet both cessetionists and non-cessetionists agree
that it is.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
3. If God is still speaking supernaturally
through prophecy, tongues, word of
wisdom, etc., then the Canon of Scripture
is still open.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
“It might, indeed, be a priori conceivable
“It might, indeed, be a priori conceivable
that God should deal with men
that God should deal with men
[individually], and reveal Himself and
[individually], and reveal Himself and
His will to each individual, throughout the
His will to each individual, throughout the
whole course of history, in the [depths] of
whole course of history, in the [depths] of
his own consciousness. This is the mystics
his own consciousness. This is the mystics
dream. It has not, however, been God’s
dream. It has not, however, been God’s
way. He has chosen rather to deal with the
way. He has chosen rather to deal with the
race in its entirety, and to give this race
race in its entirety, and to give this race
His complete revelation of Himself in an
His complete revelation of Himself in an
organic whole.”
organic whole.”
–B.B. Warfield
–B.B. Warfield
Counterfeit Miracles (Carlisle, PN: Banner of Truth, 1972), 26
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Counterfeit Miracles

(Carlisle, PN: Banner of Truth, 1972), 26
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
4. If one were to examine the Scripture closely, it
becomes evident that God’s direct intervention
through prophecy and supernatural signs and
wonders was not the norm as it may seem. The
Bible, as theological history (not exhaustive
history), only records the times when God does
intervene, thereby giving the impression that
God’s direct encounters through prophets,
dreams, visions, etc. are God’s modus operandi
when they are not.
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Noah

2000+ yrs of apparent silence

50

Elijah & Elisha

fa
o
rs
0y

t si
ren
a
pp

Moses

e
nc
le

900 yrs of apparent silence

Christ and
The Apostles
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
5. History convincingly suggests that the
supernatural sign gifts have ceased. We do
not see evidence of confirmed prophets
after the death of the last apostle. Only
fringe groups here and there have claimed
that God still speaks through prophets,
tongues, etc., until the 20th century when
the charismatic revival began.
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
“This whole place [1 Cor. 12 on
“This whole place [1 Cor. 12 on
spiritual gifts] is very
spiritual gifts] is very
obscure .. .. .. but the obscurity is
obscure
but the obscurity is
produced by our ignorance of the
produced by our ignorance of the
facts referred to and by their
facts referred to and by their
cessation, being such as then
cessation, being such as then
used to occur, but now no longer
used to occur, but now no longer
take place.”
take place.”
–John Chrysostom (347-407)
–John Chrysostom (347-407)

ECF 2.12.1.1.29.0
ECF 2.12.1.1.29.0

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
“In the earliest time the Holy Ghost fell
“In the earliest time the Holy Ghost fell
upon them that believed: and they spoke
upon them that believed: and they spoke
with tongues which they had not learned ‘as
with tongues which they had not learned ‘as
the Spirit gave them utterance.’ These were
the Spirit gave them utterance.’ These were
signs adapted to the time. For it was proper
signs adapted to the time. For it was proper
for the Holy Spirit to evidence Himself in
for the Holy Spirit to evidence Himself in
all tongues, and to show that the Gospel of
all tongues, and to show that the Gospel of
God had come to all tongues [languages]
God had come to all tongues [languages]
over the whole earth. The thing was done for
over the whole earth. The thing was done for
a authentication and it passed away.”
a authentication and it passed away.”
–St. Augustine (354-430)
–St. Augustinethe(354-430)
Ten Homilies on
first Epistle of John VI, 10

Ten Homilies on the first Epistle of John VI, 10

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Question
What is the Soft Cessationist view of
Prophecy?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
Soft Cessationism:

Adherents:

Or “Soft Continuationist.”
The view that the
miraculous sign gifts could
still be given today, but
believers need to be careful
about outright acceptance of
people’s claims of
possession.
D. A. Carson, Robert Saucy

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
Defense of Soft Cessationism:

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
1. Neither side’s arguments are conclusive.
We must therefore proceed with great
caution.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
2. While it may be true that Church history
has not seen the continuation of God
speaking directly, this does not mean that
it is not possible.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
“God, in his ordinary providence,
“God, in his ordinary providence,
makes use of means, yet is free
makes use of means, yet is free
to work without, above, and
to work without, above, and
against them, at his pleasure.”
against them, at his pleasure.”
–Westminster Confession of
–Westminster Confession of
Faith
Faith

5.3
5.3

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
3. Those who adhere to a futuristic
interpretation of Revelation must concede
that there are going to be prophets in the
future as represented by the Two
Witnesses (Rev. 11:3) and, possibly, the
144,000 Israelites (Rev. 7:4). Therefore,
we must be open to further direct
revelation from God.
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Excursus:
Does God Still Speak Today?
Guiding Principles:
Principles
1. God’s Word is not something to be trifled with
(Ex. 20:7).
2. If you are a prophet, you must show convincing
signs of a prophet (Deut 18:15-22).
3. If you are a prophet, you must have orthodox
theology (Deut. 13:1-3).
4. If someone believes that they have a word from
the Lord, they had better be certain and be ready
to live by the consequences if it turns out false.
Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Unity and Diversity
Doing Theology in the
Emerging Context

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Unity and Diversity

How do we do theology in our
emerging context?

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Unity and Diversity

semper reformanda
“Always reforming”
This is the Reformation principle that Christian theology is always
This is the Reformation principle that Christian theology is always
undergoing change, enhancement, and development. the Reformers
undergoing change, enhancement, and development. the Reformers
understood that if theology was, at any point, thought to be solidified
understood that if theology was, at any point, thought to be solidified
and one person’s, group’s, tradition’s, or denomination’s perspective
and one person’s, group’s, tradition’s, or denomination’s perspective
was thought of to be “above all reproach” and, therefore, unable to be
was thought of to be “above all reproach” and, therefore, unable to be
developed, the task of doing theology would be severely grieved. Our
developed, the task of doing theology would be severely grieved. Our
theology must be reforming itself continually.
theology must be reforming itself continually.
Unity and Diversity
Apostles’ Creed

I believe in God the Father, Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth
And in Jesus Christ, his only begotten Son, our Lord
Who was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary
Suffered under Pontius Pilate; was crucified, dead and buried; He descended into
the grave
The third day he rose again from the dead
He ascended into heaven, and sits at the right hand of God the Father Almighty
From thence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead
I believe in the Holy Ghost
I believe a holy catholic church; the communion of saints
The forgiveness of sins
The resurrection of the body
And the life everlasting. Amen.

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Unity and Diversity

Unity and Diversity among the
Traditions

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Unity and Diversity

Doctrine of Man and Grace
(fifth century)

Doctrine of Christ

Definition of Chalcedon (451)

Trinity (325)

Counsel of Nicea (325)

100
A.D.

400
A.D.

Doctrine of the Atonement
(eleventh century)

1100
A.D.

1600
A.D.

2000
A.D.
Unity and Diversity

Unity and Diversity among
Protestant Denominations

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Unity and Diversity
Five “Solas” of the Protestant Reformation
Reformed
Understanding
Meaning

Sola Scriptura

Sola Christus

The “Scripture
alone” contains
primary
authority to
dictate the lives
of believers.

The work of
“Christ alone”
is the basis for
justification.

Sola Gratia
Justification is
by means of
God’s “grace
alone.”

Sola Fide

Sola deo Gloria

“Faith alone” is
the only
instrumental
cause of
justification.

All is done for
“God’s glory
alone.”
Unity and Diversity

Doctrine of Man and Grace
(fifth century)

Doctrine of Christ

Definition of Chalcedon (451)

Trinity (325)

Counsel of Nicea (325)

100
A.D.

400
A.D.

Doctrine of Scripture
(sixteenth century)

Doctrine of Justification
(sixteenth century)

Doctrine of the Atonement
(eleventh century)

1100
A.D.

1600
A.D.

2000
A.D.
Unity and Diversity

Unity and Diversity among the
Sexes

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Unity and Diversity

Unity and Diversity among the
Nations

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Unity and Diversity

Unity and Diversity among the
Peoples

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
Unity and Diversity
Luke 8:5-18

Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Basic Content of Catechesis ppt
Basic Content of Catechesis pptBasic Content of Catechesis ppt
Basic Content of Catechesis pptOlivia Estamo
 
Sources (Content) of Catechesis by Jo Manabat
Sources (Content) of Catechesis by Jo ManabatSources (Content) of Catechesis by Jo Manabat
Sources (Content) of Catechesis by Jo Manabateccce821
 
Effective Bible Study: A Four-Part Method
Effective Bible Study: A Four-Part MethodEffective Bible Study: A Four-Part Method
Effective Bible Study: A Four-Part MethodAugsburg Fortress
 
Basic content of the church's catechesis
Basic content of the church's catechesisBasic content of the church's catechesis
Basic content of the church's catechesisMatthew Cullen Cameyog
 
Ecclesiology Part 2 - The Purpose of the Church.
Ecclesiology Part 2 - The Purpose of the Church.Ecclesiology Part 2 - The Purpose of the Church.
Ecclesiology Part 2 - The Purpose of the Church.Robert Tan
 
Sacraments of Initiation: Confirmation
Sacraments of Initiation: ConfirmationSacraments of Initiation: Confirmation
Sacraments of Initiation: Confirmationrawlean
 
The history of theology
The history of theologyThe history of theology
The history of theologyMichael Patton
 
Major Doctrines Of Christianity
Major Doctrines Of ChristianityMajor Doctrines Of Christianity
Major Doctrines Of Christianitytnvyen
 
Ch.01 introduction
Ch.01   introductionCh.01   introduction
Ch.01 introductioncsbssp
 
Christian Morality [Catholic Basics]
Christian Morality [Catholic Basics]Christian Morality [Catholic Basics]
Christian Morality [Catholic Basics]Loyola Press
 

Mais procurados (20)

Basic Content of Catechesis ppt
Basic Content of Catechesis pptBasic Content of Catechesis ppt
Basic Content of Catechesis ppt
 
Mariology
MariologyMariology
Mariology
 
2 sacred scriptures
2 sacred scriptures2 sacred scriptures
2 sacred scriptures
 
Contextual Theology
Contextual TheologyContextual Theology
Contextual Theology
 
Christology
ChristologyChristology
Christology
 
Sources (Content) of Catechesis by Jo Manabat
Sources (Content) of Catechesis by Jo ManabatSources (Content) of Catechesis by Jo Manabat
Sources (Content) of Catechesis by Jo Manabat
 
Effective Bible Study: A Four-Part Method
Effective Bible Study: A Four-Part MethodEffective Bible Study: A Four-Part Method
Effective Bible Study: A Four-Part Method
 
Introduction To Theology (2004)
Introduction To Theology (2004)Introduction To Theology (2004)
Introduction To Theology (2004)
 
Basic content of the church's catechesis
Basic content of the church's catechesisBasic content of the church's catechesis
Basic content of the church's catechesis
 
The Human Person as the Imago Dei
The Human Person as the Imago DeiThe Human Person as the Imago Dei
The Human Person as the Imago Dei
 
Christology
ChristologyChristology
Christology
 
Ecclesiology Part 2 - The Purpose of the Church.
Ecclesiology Part 2 - The Purpose of the Church.Ecclesiology Part 2 - The Purpose of the Church.
Ecclesiology Part 2 - The Purpose of the Church.
 
Sacraments of Initiation: Confirmation
Sacraments of Initiation: ConfirmationSacraments of Initiation: Confirmation
Sacraments of Initiation: Confirmation
 
the church
the churchthe church
the church
 
The history of theology
The history of theologyThe history of theology
The history of theology
 
Major Doctrines Of Christianity
Major Doctrines Of ChristianityMajor Doctrines Of Christianity
Major Doctrines Of Christianity
 
Liturgical Year
Liturgical Year Liturgical Year
Liturgical Year
 
Ch.01 introduction
Ch.01   introductionCh.01   introduction
Ch.01 introduction
 
Christian Morality [Catholic Basics]
Christian Morality [Catholic Basics]Christian Morality [Catholic Basics]
Christian Morality [Catholic Basics]
 
Total Evangelism
Total EvangelismTotal Evangelism
Total Evangelism
 

Destaque

01 Introduction to Theology and Beauty
01 Introduction to Theology and Beauty01 Introduction to Theology and Beauty
01 Introduction to Theology and Beautytheoaesthetics
 
01 Introduction to Theology
01 Introduction to Theology01 Introduction to Theology
01 Introduction to TheologyKevin Smith
 
Is Our Theology Enslaved to Law?–-Understanding the Relationship between Bibl...
Is Our Theology Enslaved to Law?–-Understanding the Relationship between Bibl...Is Our Theology Enslaved to Law?–-Understanding the Relationship between Bibl...
Is Our Theology Enslaved to Law?–-Understanding the Relationship between Bibl...Jackson Wu
 
CHRIST CRITICIZES THE PHARISEES
CHRIST CRITICIZES THE PHARISEESCHRIST CRITICIZES THE PHARISEES
CHRIST CRITICIZES THE PHARISEESRonnie Dime
 
Becoming Like Christ Evangelism
Becoming Like Christ EvangelismBecoming Like Christ Evangelism
Becoming Like Christ EvangelismMichael Smith
 
BecomingLikeChristHindranceTheHeart
BecomingLikeChristHindranceTheHeartBecomingLikeChristHindranceTheHeart
BecomingLikeChristHindranceTheHeartMichael Smith
 
Is Mormonism Christian?
Is Mormonism Christian?Is Mormonism Christian?
Is Mormonism Christian?robinbraves
 
March 27 2016 - Sunday Service Message - THE RESURRECTION OF THE LORD JESUS
March 27 2016 - Sunday Service Message - THE RESURRECTION OF THE  LORD JESUSMarch 27 2016 - Sunday Service Message - THE RESURRECTION OF THE  LORD JESUS
March 27 2016 - Sunday Service Message - THE RESURRECTION OF THE LORD JESUSCatherine Lirio
 
Presentationon Evangelical Soteriology
Presentationon Evangelical SoteriologyPresentationon Evangelical Soteriology
Presentationon Evangelical SoteriologyKyle Roberts
 
Christ like practice
Christ like practiceChrist like practice
Christ like practicebrianmclaren
 
04 April 21, 2013, The Parables Of The Hidden Treasure And The Fine Pearl
04 April 21, 2013, The Parables Of The Hidden Treasure And The Fine Pearl04 April 21, 2013, The Parables Of The Hidden Treasure And The Fine Pearl
04 April 21, 2013, The Parables Of The Hidden Treasure And The Fine PearlFirst Baptist Church Jackson
 

Destaque (20)

Introduction to moral theology
Introduction to moral theologyIntroduction to moral theology
Introduction to moral theology
 
01 Introduction to Theology and Beauty
01 Introduction to Theology and Beauty01 Introduction to Theology and Beauty
01 Introduction to Theology and Beauty
 
Theology ppt
Theology pptTheology ppt
Theology ppt
 
01 Introduction to Theology
01 Introduction to Theology01 Introduction to Theology
01 Introduction to Theology
 
Chapter 34 35
Chapter 34 35Chapter 34 35
Chapter 34 35
 
Is Our Theology Enslaved to Law?–-Understanding the Relationship between Bibl...
Is Our Theology Enslaved to Law?–-Understanding the Relationship between Bibl...Is Our Theology Enslaved to Law?–-Understanding the Relationship between Bibl...
Is Our Theology Enslaved to Law?–-Understanding the Relationship between Bibl...
 
CHRIST CRITICIZES THE PHARISEES
CHRIST CRITICIZES THE PHARISEESCHRIST CRITICIZES THE PHARISEES
CHRIST CRITICIZES THE PHARISEES
 
Proverbs 27a
Proverbs 27aProverbs 27a
Proverbs 27a
 
The Jesus Hypotheses
The Jesus HypothesesThe Jesus Hypotheses
The Jesus Hypotheses
 
You Are Called To Become
You Are Called To BecomeYou Are Called To Become
You Are Called To Become
 
Becoming Like Christ Evangelism
Becoming Like Christ EvangelismBecoming Like Christ Evangelism
Becoming Like Christ Evangelism
 
BecomingLikeChristHindranceTheHeart
BecomingLikeChristHindranceTheHeartBecomingLikeChristHindranceTheHeart
BecomingLikeChristHindranceTheHeart
 
Is Mormonism Christian?
Is Mormonism Christian?Is Mormonism Christian?
Is Mormonism Christian?
 
Mormonism
MormonismMormonism
Mormonism
 
Parables In The Bible
Parables In The BibleParables In The Bible
Parables In The Bible
 
March 27 2016 - Sunday Service Message - THE RESURRECTION OF THE LORD JESUS
March 27 2016 - Sunday Service Message - THE RESURRECTION OF THE  LORD JESUSMarch 27 2016 - Sunday Service Message - THE RESURRECTION OF THE  LORD JESUS
March 27 2016 - Sunday Service Message - THE RESURRECTION OF THE LORD JESUS
 
Presentationon Evangelical Soteriology
Presentationon Evangelical SoteriologyPresentationon Evangelical Soteriology
Presentationon Evangelical Soteriology
 
Christ like practice
Christ like practiceChrist like practice
Christ like practice
 
The Doctrine of Christ
The Doctrine of ChristThe Doctrine of Christ
The Doctrine of Christ
 
04 April 21, 2013, The Parables Of The Hidden Treasure And The Fine Pearl
04 April 21, 2013, The Parables Of The Hidden Treasure And The Fine Pearl04 April 21, 2013, The Parables Of The Hidden Treasure And The Fine Pearl
04 April 21, 2013, The Parables Of The Hidden Treasure And The Fine Pearl
 

Semelhante a Intro to theo lecture

introduction_to_theology_(2004).ppt
introduction_to_theology_(2004).pptintroduction_to_theology_(2004).ppt
introduction_to_theology_(2004).pptReygal1
 
introduction_to_theology_(2004) (2).ppt
introduction_to_theology_(2004) (2).pptintroduction_to_theology_(2004) (2).ppt
introduction_to_theology_(2004) (2).ppttauraiterrencemasang1
 
introduction_to_theology_(2004) (3).ppt
introduction_to_theology_(2004) (3).pptintroduction_to_theology_(2004) (3).ppt
introduction_to_theology_(2004) (3).ppttauraiterrencemasang1
 
theology one powerpoint 2011 final with video and quiz.pptx
theology one powerpoint 2011 final with video and quiz.pptxtheology one powerpoint 2011 final with video and quiz.pptx
theology one powerpoint 2011 final with video and quiz.pptxMark Shaw
 
OMG Week 1: Everyone is a Theologian
OMG Week 1: Everyone is a TheologianOMG Week 1: Everyone is a Theologian
OMG Week 1: Everyone is a TheologianSteve Thomason
 
Small Group Training by Jon Gaus
Small Group Training by Jon GausSmall Group Training by Jon Gaus
Small Group Training by Jon Gausjonathangaus
 
Behind the Scenes Meeting - November 2016
Behind the Scenes Meeting - November 2016Behind the Scenes Meeting - November 2016
Behind the Scenes Meeting - November 2016grassrootstbay
 
Strategies for Integrating Apologetics Into Your Local Church
Strategies for Integrating Apologetics Into Your Local ChurchStrategies for Integrating Apologetics Into Your Local Church
Strategies for Integrating Apologetics Into Your Local ChurchThird Column Ministries
 
Progressive Case Study-Client ReportOver the past 8 weeks, you hav.docx
Progressive Case Study-Client ReportOver the past 8 weeks, you hav.docxProgressive Case Study-Client ReportOver the past 8 weeks, you hav.docx
Progressive Case Study-Client ReportOver the past 8 weeks, you hav.docxbriancrawford30935
 
Theological Reflection [Catholic Basics]
Theological Reflection [Catholic Basics]Theological Reflection [Catholic Basics]
Theological Reflection [Catholic Basics]Loyola Press
 
Pakefield - Religious Studies
Pakefield - Religious StudiesPakefield - Religious Studies
Pakefield - Religious StudiesDanielBagshaw2
 
The stages of the spiritual life
The stages of the spiritual lifeThe stages of the spiritual life
The stages of the spiritual lifechristina314
 
Research methods
Research methodsResearch methods
Research methodsMissio
 
Rlg 101 chapter 1
Rlg 101 chapter 1Rlg 101 chapter 1
Rlg 101 chapter 1Mut Somoeun
 
LEADERSHIP CHAPTER 5.pptx
LEADERSHIP CHAPTER 5.pptxLEADERSHIP CHAPTER 5.pptx
LEADERSHIP CHAPTER 5.pptxTracyLewis47
 
1. Welcome To Modern World History !!!
1. Welcome To Modern World History !!!1. Welcome To Modern World History !!!
1. Welcome To Modern World History !!!Jessica Clark
 
130818 eng doctrine series (part 1) by ps. timothy loh
130818 eng  doctrine series (part 1) by ps. timothy loh130818 eng  doctrine series (part 1) by ps. timothy loh
130818 eng doctrine series (part 1) by ps. timothy loheaglepointcf
 
Is Philosophy the Biggest Threat to Islam? 1 of 9
Is Philosophy the Biggest Threat to Islam? 1 of 9Is Philosophy the Biggest Threat to Islam? 1 of 9
Is Philosophy the Biggest Threat to Islam? 1 of 9jkninstitute
 

Semelhante a Intro to theo lecture (20)

introduction_to_theology_(2004).ppt
introduction_to_theology_(2004).pptintroduction_to_theology_(2004).ppt
introduction_to_theology_(2004).ppt
 
introduction_to_theology_(2004) (2).ppt
introduction_to_theology_(2004) (2).pptintroduction_to_theology_(2004) (2).ppt
introduction_to_theology_(2004) (2).ppt
 
introduction_to_theology_(2004) (3).ppt
introduction_to_theology_(2004) (3).pptintroduction_to_theology_(2004) (3).ppt
introduction_to_theology_(2004) (3).ppt
 
theology one powerpoint 2011 final with video and quiz.pptx
theology one powerpoint 2011 final with video and quiz.pptxtheology one powerpoint 2011 final with video and quiz.pptx
theology one powerpoint 2011 final with video and quiz.pptx
 
OMG Week 1: Everyone is a Theologian
OMG Week 1: Everyone is a TheologianOMG Week 1: Everyone is a Theologian
OMG Week 1: Everyone is a Theologian
 
Small Group Training by Jon Gaus
Small Group Training by Jon GausSmall Group Training by Jon Gaus
Small Group Training by Jon Gaus
 
Behind the Scenes Meeting - November 2016
Behind the Scenes Meeting - November 2016Behind the Scenes Meeting - November 2016
Behind the Scenes Meeting - November 2016
 
What is religion
What is religionWhat is religion
What is religion
 
Strategies for Integrating Apologetics Into Your Local Church
Strategies for Integrating Apologetics Into Your Local ChurchStrategies for Integrating Apologetics Into Your Local Church
Strategies for Integrating Apologetics Into Your Local Church
 
Progressive Case Study-Client ReportOver the past 8 weeks, you hav.docx
Progressive Case Study-Client ReportOver the past 8 weeks, you hav.docxProgressive Case Study-Client ReportOver the past 8 weeks, you hav.docx
Progressive Case Study-Client ReportOver the past 8 weeks, you hav.docx
 
Theological Reflection [Catholic Basics]
Theological Reflection [Catholic Basics]Theological Reflection [Catholic Basics]
Theological Reflection [Catholic Basics]
 
Pakefield - Religious Studies
Pakefield - Religious StudiesPakefield - Religious Studies
Pakefield - Religious Studies
 
Lesson1.ppt
Lesson1.pptLesson1.ppt
Lesson1.ppt
 
The stages of the spiritual life
The stages of the spiritual lifeThe stages of the spiritual life
The stages of the spiritual life
 
Research methods
Research methodsResearch methods
Research methods
 
Rlg 101 chapter 1
Rlg 101 chapter 1Rlg 101 chapter 1
Rlg 101 chapter 1
 
LEADERSHIP CHAPTER 5.pptx
LEADERSHIP CHAPTER 5.pptxLEADERSHIP CHAPTER 5.pptx
LEADERSHIP CHAPTER 5.pptx
 
1. Welcome To Modern World History !!!
1. Welcome To Modern World History !!!1. Welcome To Modern World History !!!
1. Welcome To Modern World History !!!
 
130818 eng doctrine series (part 1) by ps. timothy loh
130818 eng  doctrine series (part 1) by ps. timothy loh130818 eng  doctrine series (part 1) by ps. timothy loh
130818 eng doctrine series (part 1) by ps. timothy loh
 
Is Philosophy the Biggest Threat to Islam? 1 of 9
Is Philosophy the Biggest Threat to Islam? 1 of 9Is Philosophy the Biggest Threat to Islam? 1 of 9
Is Philosophy the Biggest Threat to Islam? 1 of 9
 

Mais de One In Christ Movement (20)

God is holy
God is holyGod is holy
God is holy
 
PERSONAL ENCOUNTER January 12, 2014
PERSONAL ENCOUNTER January 12, 2014PERSONAL ENCOUNTER January 12, 2014
PERSONAL ENCOUNTER January 12, 2014
 
January 12, 2014
January 12, 2014January 12, 2014
January 12, 2014
 
Jan 5, 2014
Jan 5, 2014Jan 5, 2014
Jan 5, 2014
 
Like Father, Like Son 122913
Like Father, Like Son 122913Like Father, Like Son 122913
Like Father, Like Son 122913
 
Guard your Heart 111013
Guard your Heart 111013Guard your Heart 111013
Guard your Heart 111013
 
Charismata bld lecture
Charismata bld lectureCharismata bld lecture
Charismata bld lecture
 
Lovestruck bs guide
Lovestruck bs guideLovestruck bs guide
Lovestruck bs guide
 
Worshipping god
Worshipping godWorshipping god
Worshipping god
 
The eternal god
The eternal godThe eternal god
The eternal god
 
Selfexistence of god
Selfexistence of godSelfexistence of god
Selfexistence of god
 
Knowing god
Knowing godKnowing god
Knowing god
 
God's wrath
God's wrathGod's wrath
God's wrath
 
The unity of god
The unity of godThe unity of god
The unity of god
 
God's patience
God's patienceGod's patience
God's patience
 
God's omnipresence
God's omnipresenceGod's omnipresence
God's omnipresence
 
God's righteousness
God's righteousnessGod's righteousness
God's righteousness
 
God's grace
God's graceGod's grace
God's grace
 
God's benevolence
God's benevolenceGod's benevolence
God's benevolence
 
God is love
God is loveGod is love
God is love
 

Último

Codex Singularity: Search for the Prisca Sapientia
Codex Singularity: Search for the Prisca SapientiaCodex Singularity: Search for the Prisca Sapientia
Codex Singularity: Search for the Prisca Sapientiajfrenchau
 
Elite Class ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Naraina Delhi NCR
Elite Class ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Naraina Delhi NCRElite Class ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Naraina Delhi NCR
Elite Class ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Naraina Delhi NCRDelhi Call girls
 
Top No 1 Amil baba in Islamabad Famous Amil baba in Pakistan Amil baba Contac...
Top No 1 Amil baba in Islamabad Famous Amil baba in Pakistan Amil baba Contac...Top No 1 Amil baba in Islamabad Famous Amil baba in Pakistan Amil baba Contac...
Top No 1 Amil baba in Islamabad Famous Amil baba in Pakistan Amil baba Contac...Amil Baba Naveed Bangali
 
Deerfoot Church of Christ Bulletin 4 28 24
Deerfoot Church of Christ Bulletin 4 28 24Deerfoot Church of Christ Bulletin 4 28 24
Deerfoot Church of Christ Bulletin 4 28 24deerfootcoc
 
Call Girls in majnu ka tila Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
Call Girls in majnu ka tila Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️Call Girls in majnu ka tila Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
Call Girls in majnu ka tila Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️soniya singh
 
No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Karachi
No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in KarachiNo.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Karachi
No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in KarachiAmil Baba Mangal Maseeh
 
Pradeep Bhanot - Friend, Philosopher Guide And The Brand By Arjun Jani
Pradeep Bhanot - Friend, Philosopher Guide And The Brand By Arjun JaniPradeep Bhanot - Friend, Philosopher Guide And The Brand By Arjun Jani
Pradeep Bhanot - Friend, Philosopher Guide And The Brand By Arjun JaniPradeep Bhanot
 
The King Great Goodness Part 2 ~ Mahasilava Jataka (Eng. & Chi.).pptx
The King Great Goodness Part 2 ~ Mahasilava Jataka (Eng. & Chi.).pptxThe King Great Goodness Part 2 ~ Mahasilava Jataka (Eng. & Chi.).pptx
The King Great Goodness Part 2 ~ Mahasilava Jataka (Eng. & Chi.).pptxOH TEIK BIN
 
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Chirag Delhi | Delhi
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Chirag Delhi | DelhiFULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Chirag Delhi | Delhi
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Chirag Delhi | Delhisoniya singh
 
Lucknow 💋 best call girls in Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...
Lucknow 💋 best call girls in Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...Lucknow 💋 best call girls in Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...
Lucknow 💋 best call girls in Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...anilsa9823
 
Flores de Mayo-history and origin we need to understand
Flores de Mayo-history and origin we need to understandFlores de Mayo-history and origin we need to understand
Flores de Mayo-history and origin we need to understandvillamilcecil909
 
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Punjabi Bagh | Delhi
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Punjabi Bagh | DelhiFULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Punjabi Bagh | Delhi
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Punjabi Bagh | Delhisoniya singh
 
+92343-7800299 No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Ka...
+92343-7800299 No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Ka...+92343-7800299 No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Ka...
+92343-7800299 No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Ka...Amil Baba Mangal Maseeh
 
St John's Church Parish Diary for May 2024
St John's Church Parish Diary for May 2024St John's Church Parish Diary for May 2024
St John's Church Parish Diary for May 2024Chris Lyne
 
call girls in rohini sector 22 Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
call girls in rohini sector 22 Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️call girls in rohini sector 22 Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
call girls in rohini sector 22 Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️soniya singh
 
+92343-7800299 No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Ka...
+92343-7800299 No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Ka...+92343-7800299 No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Ka...
+92343-7800299 No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Ka...Amil Baba Mangal Maseeh
 
No 1 Amil baba in UK Best Astrologer in UK Famous Vashikaran Specialist in UK
No 1 Amil baba in UK Best Astrologer in UK Famous Vashikaran Specialist in UKNo 1 Amil baba in UK Best Astrologer in UK Famous Vashikaran Specialist in UK
No 1 Amil baba in UK Best Astrologer in UK Famous Vashikaran Specialist in UKAmil Baba Naveed Bangali
 

Último (20)

Codex Singularity: Search for the Prisca Sapientia
Codex Singularity: Search for the Prisca SapientiaCodex Singularity: Search for the Prisca Sapientia
Codex Singularity: Search for the Prisca Sapientia
 
Elite Class ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Naraina Delhi NCR
Elite Class ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Naraina Delhi NCRElite Class ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Naraina Delhi NCR
Elite Class ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Naraina Delhi NCR
 
Top No 1 Amil baba in Islamabad Famous Amil baba in Pakistan Amil baba Contac...
Top No 1 Amil baba in Islamabad Famous Amil baba in Pakistan Amil baba Contac...Top No 1 Amil baba in Islamabad Famous Amil baba in Pakistan Amil baba Contac...
Top No 1 Amil baba in Islamabad Famous Amil baba in Pakistan Amil baba Contac...
 
Deerfoot Church of Christ Bulletin 4 28 24
Deerfoot Church of Christ Bulletin 4 28 24Deerfoot Church of Christ Bulletin 4 28 24
Deerfoot Church of Christ Bulletin 4 28 24
 
Call Girls in majnu ka tila Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
Call Girls in majnu ka tila Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️Call Girls in majnu ka tila Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
Call Girls in majnu ka tila Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
 
English - The Forgotten Books of Eden.pdf
English - The Forgotten Books of Eden.pdfEnglish - The Forgotten Books of Eden.pdf
English - The Forgotten Books of Eden.pdf
 
English - The Story of Ahikar, Grand Vizier of Assyria.pdf
English - The Story of Ahikar, Grand Vizier of Assyria.pdfEnglish - The Story of Ahikar, Grand Vizier of Assyria.pdf
English - The Story of Ahikar, Grand Vizier of Assyria.pdf
 
Call Girls In Nehru Place 📱 9999965857 🤩 Delhi 🫦 HOT AND SEXY VVIP 🍎 SERVICE
Call Girls In Nehru Place 📱  9999965857  🤩 Delhi 🫦 HOT AND SEXY VVIP 🍎 SERVICECall Girls In Nehru Place 📱  9999965857  🤩 Delhi 🫦 HOT AND SEXY VVIP 🍎 SERVICE
Call Girls In Nehru Place 📱 9999965857 🤩 Delhi 🫦 HOT AND SEXY VVIP 🍎 SERVICE
 
No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Karachi
No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in KarachiNo.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Karachi
No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Karachi
 
Pradeep Bhanot - Friend, Philosopher Guide And The Brand By Arjun Jani
Pradeep Bhanot - Friend, Philosopher Guide And The Brand By Arjun JaniPradeep Bhanot - Friend, Philosopher Guide And The Brand By Arjun Jani
Pradeep Bhanot - Friend, Philosopher Guide And The Brand By Arjun Jani
 
The King Great Goodness Part 2 ~ Mahasilava Jataka (Eng. & Chi.).pptx
The King Great Goodness Part 2 ~ Mahasilava Jataka (Eng. & Chi.).pptxThe King Great Goodness Part 2 ~ Mahasilava Jataka (Eng. & Chi.).pptx
The King Great Goodness Part 2 ~ Mahasilava Jataka (Eng. & Chi.).pptx
 
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Chirag Delhi | Delhi
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Chirag Delhi | DelhiFULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Chirag Delhi | Delhi
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Chirag Delhi | Delhi
 
Lucknow 💋 best call girls in Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...
Lucknow 💋 best call girls in Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...Lucknow 💋 best call girls in Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...
Lucknow 💋 best call girls in Lucknow ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Payment 8...
 
Flores de Mayo-history and origin we need to understand
Flores de Mayo-history and origin we need to understandFlores de Mayo-history and origin we need to understand
Flores de Mayo-history and origin we need to understand
 
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Punjabi Bagh | Delhi
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Punjabi Bagh | DelhiFULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Punjabi Bagh | Delhi
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Punjabi Bagh | Delhi
 
+92343-7800299 No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Ka...
+92343-7800299 No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Ka...+92343-7800299 No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Ka...
+92343-7800299 No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Ka...
 
St John's Church Parish Diary for May 2024
St John's Church Parish Diary for May 2024St John's Church Parish Diary for May 2024
St John's Church Parish Diary for May 2024
 
call girls in rohini sector 22 Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
call girls in rohini sector 22 Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️call girls in rohini sector 22 Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
call girls in rohini sector 22 Delhi 8264348440 ✅ call girls ❤️
 
+92343-7800299 No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Ka...
+92343-7800299 No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Ka...+92343-7800299 No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Ka...
+92343-7800299 No.1 Amil baba in Pakistan amil baba in Lahore amil baba in Ka...
 
No 1 Amil baba in UK Best Astrologer in UK Famous Vashikaran Specialist in UK
No 1 Amil baba in UK Best Astrologer in UK Famous Vashikaran Specialist in UKNo 1 Amil baba in UK Best Astrologer in UK Famous Vashikaran Specialist in UK
No 1 Amil baba in UK Best Astrologer in UK Famous Vashikaran Specialist in UK
 

Intro to theo lecture

  • 1. Introduction to Theology An Invitation to Theology? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 2. “Jesus said to him, ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.’” –Matthew 22:37 Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 3. Question Outline • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Who are you and why are you here? What is The Theology Program? What is theology? Who is a theologian? How do we do theology every day? What are the different categories of theology? What is the Theological Process? What is epistemology? What is postmodernism? What questions are postmoderns asking? What is the postmodern view of truth? What is the modern view of truth? What is the Christian view of truth? What truths are relative and what truths are objective? • • • • • • • • • • • • Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved. What truths are essential for orthodoxy? How certain are you about your beliefs? What is the essential difference in Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, and Protestantism? Why are there so many Protestant denominations? What are the different sources for truth? What are the benefits and deficiencies of each source? How do the different sources interact to form our theology? Does God still speak today? What is the Continuationist view of prophecy? What is the Hard Cessationist view of prophecy? What is the Soft Cessationist view of prophecy? How do we do theology in our emerging context?
  • 4. Course Outline I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. Introduction Defining Theology Categories of Theology Postmodern Epistemology Christian Epistemology Essentials of Theology Traditions of Christian Theology Sources of Theology Does God Still Speak Today? Unity and Diversity Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 5. Introduction to Theology BIBLICAL THEOLOGY SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 6. Question Who are you and why are you here? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 7. Introduction to Theology module Who you are and why you are taking this course? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 8. Introduction to Theology module Who are you and why are you taking this course? • Practical Pricilla: You are a person who Pricilla has never seen the practicality in deep theological study. You are here to see if we can change your mind. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 9. Introduction to Theology module Who are you and why are you taking this course? 2. Scared Susan: Big words scare you. You Susan don’t really think that you are smart enough to be here. You are here this time, but you may not be here the next. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 10. Introduction to Theology module Who are you and why are you taking this course? 3. Know-it-all Nick: You already know Nick everything. You are just here to see if we do… and to pick up where we leave off. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 11. Introduction to Theology module Who are you and why are you taking this course? 4. Fundamental Fred: You are the GodFred ordained guardian of orthodoxy. You are here to sit, with arms crossed, and protect. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 12. Introduction to Theology module Who are you and why are you taking this course? 5. Want-an-answer Will: You have a lot Will of questions. You are here not to do theology in community, but to write theology down with a pen and paper. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 13. Introduction to Theology module Who are you and why are you taking this course? 6. Traditionalist Teri: You want to learn, Teri but your traditions and preconceived notions bind you. You are here to have your traditions confirmed to be true. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 14. Introduction to the Theology Program Who are you and why are you taking this course? 7. Confrontational Carl: You are not a Carl believer in Christ or the Bible and have no intention of becoming one. You are here to argue. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 15. Introduction to Theology module Who are you and why are you taking this course? 8. Struggling Sam: You are a believer in Sam Christ, but you have a lot of doubts and struggles. You have never had a safe place to express those doubts. You are here to see if this is the place. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 16. Introduction to Theology module Who are you and why are you taking this course? 9. Curious Carla: You are not really sure Carla why you are here, but you’re excited to find out. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 17. Introduction to Theology module We are all real people created by a real God, and we all have real struggles, real questions, and real convictions. We are glad that you are here! Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 18. Question What is The Theology Program? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 19. Introduction to Theology module The Introduction to Theology Module is an intense theological studies program, designed for busy people who may never go to seminary but who want deep theological training. While there are many great subjects, biblical and spiritual, that Christians can and need to study, our focus is on seven specific courses of systematic theology. Our desire is to teach people how to think by opening their minds to diverse views, learning from history, wrestling with difficult issues, and graciously engaging an increasingly relativistic and postmodern world. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 20. Introduction to Theology module Mission: Renewing minds and changing lives by purposefully guiding people through a study of historic and biblical Christian theology. Goal: “Our goal is not so much to teach good theology, as important as that is, but to teach people to think.” Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 21. Introduction to Theology module What makes Introduction to Theology Module different? 1. Intensity in studies 2. Irenic theology 3. Intentional program design 4. Comprehensive / Practical coverage 5. Doing theology in community (relevance) Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 22. Intensity in Studies The Church must have an avenue of intense, interactive Christian education through a program which gives people an opportunity to learn at a level that other venues cannot provide. HOPE TRAINING CENTER endeavors to be this avenue. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 23. Intensity in Studies Sermon Low Commitment Fellowship/ Sunday School Interactive Classroom High Commitment
  • 24. Intensity in Studies Sermon Fellowship/ Sunday School Low Expectations Interactive Classroom High Expectations •Attendance •Assigned readings •Books •Papers •Case studies •Memorization of Scripture •Grades Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 25. Intensity in Studies Fellowship/ Sunday School Sermon Devotional (Brings encouragement for the week) Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved. Interactive Classroom Foundational (Builds theology for a lifetime)
  • 26. Intensity in Studies Sermon Fellowship/ Sunday School Short-term life change Interactive Classroom Long-term life change Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 27. Intensity in Studies Sermon Fellowship/ Sunday School Exhortation Interactive Classroom Education Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 28. Intensity in Studies Sermon Fellowship/ Sunday School Interactive Classroom The education program of the Church needs to include all of these in balance. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 29. Irenic Theology Key Terms Irenic Theology: Polemic Theology: Apologetic Theology: Theology that is done peaceably, accurately representing all views, even when you oppose them. Theology that is done in a warlike manner inside the Church, speaking against those with whom there is disagreement. Theology that is done to defend the faith against those who oppose outside the church. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 32. Comprehensive Coverage In the courses, we will address all the relevant major issues, current and historic, of which we think people need to be aware. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 33. Doing Theology in a Community We believe that truth is not found in Spiritilluminated individuals, but in a community of Spirit-illuminated individuals. Therefore, we believe that the Body of Christ, must come together to understand theology, clarifying it from many perspectives and differing experiences, and applying theology in the community. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 34. Discussion Groups Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 35. Defining Theology “What does it mean to ‘do’ theology?” Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 36. Question What is theology? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 37. Traditions of Theology Epistemology Epistemology Denominations Eastern Orthodox Eastern Orthodox Pluralism Protestant Experience Cessationism Relativism PENTECOSTALI SM Truth Roman Catholic Roman Catholic Exclusivism Special Revelation Special Revelation Modernism Prophecy Protestant theology Postmodernism Cessationism
  • 38. Defining Theology What is Theology? Write a one or two sentence definition of theology: Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 39. Defining Theology “The study or science “The study or science of God.” of God.” –Millard Erickson –Millard Erickson Christian Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2001), 22 Christian Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2001), 22 “The Science of God “The Science of God and of the relations and of the relations between God and between God and the universe.” the universe.” –A. H. Strong –A. H. Strong “Rational discussion “Rational discussion respecting the deity.” respecting the deity.” –Augustine –Augustine “Thinking about God “Thinking about God and expressing those and expressing those thoughts in some thoughts in some way.” way.” –Charles Ryrie –Charles Ryrie Basic Theology (Wheaton, IL: 1986), 99 Basic Theology (Wheaton, IL: 1986), Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 40. Defining Theology “The science of God or of religion; the science which “The science of God or of religion; the science which treats of the existence, character, and attributes of treats of the existence, character, and attributes of God, his laws and government, the doctrines we are God, his laws and government, the doctrines we are to believe, and the duties we are to practice; divinity; to believe, and the duties we are to practice; divinity; (as more commonly understood) the knowledge (as more commonly understood) the knowledge derivable from the Scriptures, the systematic exhibition of derivable from the Scriptures, the systematic exhibition of revealed truth, the science of Christian faith and life.” revealed truth, the science of Christian faith and life.” —Webster’s Dictionary —Webster’s Dictionary Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 41. Question Who is a theologian? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 42. Defining Theology Who is a theologian? Anyone who has asked the ultimate questions of life: • Why am I here? • What is life? • What happens after death? • What is the difference between right and wrong? • Why is there something instead of nothing? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 43. Defining Theology The question is not, “Who is a The question is not, “Who is a theologian?” but “What kind of theologian?” but “What kind of theologian am II going to be?” Are theologian am going to be?” Are you going to be a good theologian you going to be a good theologian or a bad theologian? This is a or a bad theologian? This is a more accurate question because, more accurate question because, as one writer put it, “not all as one writer put it, “not all theologies are equal.” theologies are equal.” –Source unknown –Source unknown Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 44. Defining Theology “We live in what may be the most anti“We live in what may be the most antiintellectual period in the history of intellectual period in the history of Western civilization. .. .. We must have Western civilization. We must have passion—indeed hearts on fire for the passion—indeed hearts on fire for the things of God. But that passion must things of God. But that passion must resist with intensity the antiresist with intensity the antiintellectual spirit of the world.” intellectual spirit of the world.” —R. C. Sproul —R. C. Sproul “Burning Hearts Are Not Nourished by Empty Heads,” Christianity Today 26 (Sept. 3, 1982), 100 “Burning Hearts Are Not Nourished by Empty Heads,” Christianity Today 26 (Sept. 3, 1982), 100 Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 45. Defining Theology There are basically six arenas in which we can do theology: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Tabloid Theology Folk Theology Lay Theology Ministerial Theology Professional Theology Academic Theology Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 47. Defining Theology Tabloid Theologian: One who constructs his or her theology based upon naïve hearsay information that has no basis in fact and very little, if any, evidence to be believed. Many times people are Tabloid theologians because of the theology’s appearance of originality. As well, it can be “cutting edge” in many people’s minds. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 48. Defining Theology What are some examples of Tabloid theology? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 49. Defining Theology • Tabloid theology examples Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 50. Defining Theology • • • • • • Hitchhiking angel Growing fire hose “I Saw Heaven” Statues with tears of blood Apparitions of Mary (what other examples can you give?) Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 51. Defining Theology Folk Theologian: One who uncritically and unreflectively constructs his or her theology according to traditions and religious folklore. The Folk theologian is often very dogmatic about his or her beliefs. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 52. Defining Theology What are some examples of Folk theology? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 53. Defining Theology Folk theology examples: Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 54. Defining Theology Folk theology examples: • • • • • Occults; Espiritistas Ghosts Angels’ wings Good works salvation All people are good at heart Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 55. Defining Theology Folk theology examples: • Amulets • Talismans • Witch Doctors • Divination • Ghosts • Animism • (give your own examples) Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 56. Defining Theology Why do you think that it is so hard for Folk theologians to learn? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 57. Defining Theology Lay Theologian: A layperson who constructs his or her theology and who, unlike the folk and tabloid theologian, is . . . (1) more reflective upon learned theological concepts (2) likely to formulate a system of beliefs which distinguishes between essential and nonessential doctrine (3) more critical of unfounded traditions (4) willing to use study tools Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 58. Defining Theology Ministerial Theologian: A layperson who constructs his or her theology and who, unlike the lay theologian is . . . (1) educated in theological methodology (2) able to use study tools and resources at a more effective level (3) able to openly critique personal theology against competing models (4) intent on devoting more time to reflection so that theological integration can take place Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 59. Defining Theology Fundamental Theologian: Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved. One who constructs his or her theology seriously and fundamentally. They usually. . . (1) are didactically purposed toward lay and pastoral theologians (2) conduct practical original research (3) critically evaluate common theological trends and folk theology.
  • 60. Defining Theology Fundamental theologians are often accused of “quenching the Spirit.” Why do you think they receive this accusation? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 61. • BECAUSE THEY WILL USUALLY ASK THE QUESTIONS: • Is that Biblical? • Where in the Bible can you find that? • Is it Theological? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 62. Defining Theology Academic Theologian: A professional theologian who constructs his theology with an overly speculative and critical spirit. His dialogue can usually come only with other theologians. It is often called “Ivory Tower theology.” Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 63. Defining Theology What are some examples of Academic theology? Why do you think someone would want to be an Academic theologian? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 64. Defining Theology Skeptical Naïve Critical Gates permanently locked Sensational Gates wide open Tabloid Folk Lay Ministerial Fundamental Academic
  • 66. Defining Theology “Theology is for everyone. Indeed, “Theology is for everyone. Indeed, everyone needs to be a theologian. In everyone needs to be a theologian. In reality, everyone is a theologian—of one reality, everyone is a theologian—of one sort or another. And therein lies the sort or another. And therein lies the problem. There is nothing wrong with problem. There is nothing wrong with being an amateur theologian or a being an amateur theologian or a professional theologian, but there is professional theologian, but there is everything wrong with being an ignorant everything wrong with being an ignorant or sloppy theologian.” or sloppy theologian.” —Charles Ryrie —Charles Ryrie Basic Theology (Wheaton, IL: 1986), 9. Basic Theology (Wheaton, IL: 1986), 9. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 67. Defining Theology How do we “do” theology every day? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 68. Defining Theology How do we “do” theology every day? In other words, how does our theology influence our daily routine? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 69. Defining Theology 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. When we think about God. When we share the Gospel. When we interpret the Bible. When we get sick. When we defend the faith. When we plan for the future. When we choose schooling for our children. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 70. Defining Theology 8. When we vote. 9. When we attempt to deal with sin in our lives. 10. When we decide on who we marry. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 71. Defining Theology What is theology? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 72. Defining Theology credo ut intelligam “faith seeking understanding” This is aaLatin phrase coined by Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109) This is Latin phrase coined by Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109) meaning “faith seeking understanding.” This is one of the earliest meaning “faith seeking understanding.” This is one of the earliest definitions of theology. It starts with the assumption that we are definitions of theology. It starts with the assumption that we are believers and, as such, we are seeking to understand our beliefs better. believers and, as such, we are seeking to understand our beliefs better.
  • 73. Discussion Groups Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 74. Categories of Theology Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 75. Question What are the different categories of theology? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 77. Categories of Theology Systematic Theology • Prolegomena: Literally means “things which are spoken beforehand.” Deals with the foundational issues of theology such as theological methodology, sources, and reasons for the study of theology. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 78. Categories of Theology • • Bibliology: The study of the nature, transmission, canonization, and purpose of Scripture. Theology Proper: The study of God’s existence, nature, and attributes. Sometimes called “Trinitarianism.” Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 79. Categories of Theology • • Christology: The study of the person and work of Christ. Pneumatology: The study of the person and work of the Holy Spirit. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 80. Categories of Theology • • • Anthropology: The study of the purpose and nature of humanity, both in its pre-fall and post-fall state. Hamartiology: The study of the nature, origin, and effects of sin on all creation. Angelology: The study of the nature and works of demons and angels. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 81. Categories of Theology • • • Soteriology: The study of salvation. Ecclesiology: The study of the nature of the Church. Eschatology: The study of the end times. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 82. Categories of Theology Systematic Biblical • Restricts the formulation of theology only to the Scripture. • Formulates theology from all sources of theology, including Scripture. • Sometimes will examine the individual parts of Scripture in order to formulate a particular theology that is restricted to a certain time period and a particular people (e.g., Pre-mosaic theology). • Correlates the entirety of Scripture to formulate a general theology for all time and for all people. • Sometimes examines the theology of a certain author (e.g.,, John or Paul). • Correlates information on a doctrine by examining the theology of all the authors.
  • 83. Categories of Theology Systematic Historical • Restricts the formulation of theology only to the history of the Church. • Formulates theology from all sources of theology. • Sometimes will examine the individual periods of Church history in order to formulate a particular theology that is restricted to a certain time period (e.g.,, Patristic, Medieval, Reformation). • Correlates the all of Church history to formulate a general theology for all time and for all people.
  • 84. Categories of Theology Systematic Philosophical • Restricts the formulation of theology only to that which can be ascertained by reason. • Formulates theology from all sources of theology. • Sometimes will examine the individual periods of philosophical history in order to formulate a particular theology that is restricted to a certain time period (e.g.,, enlightenment, modern, postmodern). • Correlates the all of philosophical history to formulate a general theology for all time and for all people.
  • 85. Categories of Theology Creedal Systematic • Restricts the formulation of • Formulates theology from all sources of theology theology only to that of a including the creedal particular religious institution statement of many or denomination. institutions and denominations.
  • 86. Categories of Theology Apologetic • Formulates theology for the purpose of explaining and defending the faith to those outside the faith. Systematic • Formulates theology for the purpose of creating a comprehensive and coherent understanding of various doctrines.
  • 87. Question What is the Theological Process? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 88. Truth Extract timeless principles 2 Theological Statement “What is the timeless truth taught?” . “What did it mean then?” • • • • Historical interpretation Grammatical interpretation Contextual interpretation Literary Interpretation Ancient Audience Ancient Audience 1 Exegetical Statement Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time bound Audience Contextualize Contextualize Principles for today Principles for today Analogy of Scripture . 3 Homiletical Statement . “How does it apply to us?”
  • 89. Systematic Theology Ancient Audience Ancient Audience Biblical Hermeneutics Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience Application
  • 90. Ancient Audience Ancient Audience ? Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience
  • 91. Liberal Theology Liberal Theology Ancient Audience Ancient Audience ? Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience
  • 92. ? Ancient Audience Ancient Audience Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience
  • 93. Hypocritical Folk Theology Hypocritical Folk Theology ? Ancient Audience Ancient Audience Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience
  • 94. Ancient Audience Ancient Audience Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience ?
  • 95. Subjective Theology Subjective Theology Ancient Audience Ancient Audience Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience ?
  • 96. Ancient Audience Ancient Audience ? Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience ?
  • 97. Irrelevant Theology Irrelevant Theology Ancient Audience Ancient Audience ? Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience ?
  • 98. ? Ancient Audience Ancient Audience Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience ?
  • 99. ? Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience Ancient Audience Ancient Audience Contemporary Audience Folk Theology Folk Theology ?
  • 100. ? Ancient Audience Ancient Audience ? Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience
  • 101. Short-circuit Theology Short-circuit Theology ? Ancient Audience Ancient Audience ? Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience
  • 102. ? Ancient Audience Ancient Audience ? Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience ?
  • 103. Eisegetical Theology Eisegetical Theology ? Ancient Audience Ancient Audience ? Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience ?
  • 104. ? Ancient Audience Ancient Audience ? Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience ?
  • 105. Exegetical Theology Exegetical Theology ? Ancient Audience Ancient Audience ? Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience ?
  • 106. • • • • Historical interpretation Grammatical interpretation Contextual interpretation Literary Interpretation Ancient Audience Ancient Audience 1. Exegetical Statement “What did it mean then?” Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience Contextualize Contextualize Principles for today Principles for today Analogy of Scripture Theology 3. Homiletical Statement “How does it apply to us?”
  • 107. Categories of Theology Scripture Biblical Theology Historical Theology Philosophical Theology Systematic Theology Apologetic Theology Creedal/Dogmatic Theology
  • 108. Postmodern Epistemology Understanding Our Changing Culture Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 109. Postmodern Epistemology What is Epistemology? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 110. Postmodern Epistemology “The theory or science “The theory or science of the method or of the method or grounds of grounds of knowledge.” knowledge.” —Webster’s Dictionary —Webster’s Dictionary Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 111. Postmodern Epistemology “The branch of philosophy “The branch of philosophy that is concerned with the that is concerned with the theory of knowledge. It is theory of knowledge. It is an inquiry into the nature an inquiry into the nature and source of knowledge, and source of knowledge, the bounds of knowledge, the bounds of knowledge, and the justification of and the justification of claims to knowledge.” claims to knowledge.” —Paul Feinberg —Paul Feinberg Walter A. Elwell ed., “Epistemology” in The Evangelical Dictionary of Theology Walter A. Elwell ed., “Epistemology” in The Evangelical Dictionary of Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2001), 382. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2001), 382. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 112. Postmodern Epistemology Key Terms Relativism: Subjectivism: Skepticism: Perspectivism: Pragmatism: Objectivism: The belief that all truth is relative, being determined by some group. The belief that all truth is subjective, being defined by the perspective of the individual. The belief that truth cannot be known with certainty. The belief that truth is found in the combined perspectives of many. The belief that truth is ultimately defined by that which works to accomplish the best outcome. “The end justifies the means.” The belief that truth is an objective reality that exist whether someone believes it or not. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 113. Postmodern Epistemology Which best describes our culture today? 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Relativism Subjectivism Skepticism Perspectivalism Pragmatism Objectivism Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 114. Postmodern Epistemology Which is true? 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Relativism Subjectivism Skepticism Perspectivalism Pragmatism Objectivism Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 115. Question What is Postmodernism? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 116. Postmodern Epistemology “Christian’s today cannot work with the “Christian’s today cannot work with the same assumptions that we did just 20 same assumptions that we did just 20 years ago. At that time, people would years ago. At that time, people would join you in your search for absolute join you in your search for absolute truth. It is different now. Today, before truth. It is different now. Today, before we begin to lead people to the truth of we begin to lead people to the truth of Jesus Christ, we may have to lead them Jesus Christ, we may have to lead them to the truth of truth. Common ground to the truth of truth. Common ground must be created before the Gospel can be must be created before the Gospel can be proclaimed” proclaimed” Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 117. Postmodern Epistemology “Apologetically, the question which arises in “Apologetically, the question which arises in the postmodern context is the following. How the postmodern context is the following. How can Christianity’s claims to truth be taken can Christianity’s claims to truth be taken seriously, when there are so many rival seriously, when there are so many rival alternatives, and when ‘truth’ itself has alternatives, and when ‘truth’ itself has become a devalued notion? No-one can lay become a devalued notion? No-one can lay claim to possession of truth. It is all a claim to possession of truth. It is all a question of perspective. The conclusion of question of perspective. The conclusion of this line of thought is as simple as it is this line of thought is as simple as it is devastating: ‘the truth is that there is no devastating: ‘the truth is that there is no truth” truth” –Alister McGrath –Alister McGrath A Passion for Truth (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 1996), 188 Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved. for Truth (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 1996), 188 A Passion
  • 118. Postmodern Epistemology A Conversation Between Protagoras and Socrates (4th Century B.C.) Protagoras: Truth is relative. It is only a matter of opinion. Socrates: You mean that truth is mere subjective opinion? Protagoras: Exactly. What is true for you is true for you, and what is true for me is true for me. Truth is subjective. Socrates: Do you really mean that? That my opinion is true by virtue of its being my opinion? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 119. Postmodern Epistemology Protagoras: Indeed I do. Socrates: My opinion is: Truth is absolute, not opinion, and that you, Mr. Protagoras, are absolutely in error. Since this is my opinion, you must grant that it is true according to your philosophy. Protagoras: You are quite correct, Socrates. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 120. Postmodern Epistemology Self-defeating Statements “I cannot speak a word in English.” “My wife has never been married.” “We cannot know anything about God.” “There is no such thing as truth.” “Truth cannot be known with certainty.” Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 121. Postmodern Epistemology A short history of western civilization Three periods: 1. Premodern (400-1600 A.D.) 2. Modern (1600-1900 A.D.) 3. Postmodern (1960-present) Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 123. Postmodern Epistemology Back Stage of Truth Stage of Truth Front
  • 125. Postmodern Epistemology Modern Generation – Preboomers – Boomers 53% 53% Postmodern Generation – Busters (Gen X) – Bridgers (Gen Y) Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved. 57% 57%
  • 126. Postmodern Epistemology Modernism • • • • • • • • Intellectual Reason Optimism Hope for the future Objectivism Exclusivism Science method Man is evolving Postmodernism • • • • • • • • Anti-intellectual Feeling Pessimism Despair for the present Subjectivism/relativism Pluralism/inclusivism Distrust in science Man is devolving
  • 127. Postmodern Epistemology The Ideal Modern Man: Mr. Spock • Spock is always logical and objective. • Never acts upon feeling, because that would be “illogical.” “Physical laws simply cannot be ignored. Existence cannot be without them.” “Pain is a thing of the mind. The mind can be controlled.”
  • 128. Postmodern Epistemology The Ideal Modern Man Mocked: Data • • Data is the “perfect” modern human. Despite his “perfection,” Data . . . 1. Wants to be human. 2. Rebels against logic. 3. Attempts to develop emotions and feelings
  • 129. Postmodern Epistemology • Premodern: “There’s balls and Premodern there’s strikes, and I call them as they are.” • Modern: “There’s balls and Modern there’s strikes, and I call them as I see them.” • Postmodern: “They ain’t Postmodern nothing ‘til I call ‘em.”
  • 130. Postmodern Epistemology “In Postmodernism, there is no “In Postmodernism, there is no objective, universal truth; there is objective, universal truth; there is only the perspective of the group. .. .. .. only the perspective of the group. In postmodernism, all viewpoints, all In postmodernism, all viewpoints, all lifestyles, all beliefs and behaviors lifestyles, all beliefs and behaviors are regarded as equally valid. .. .. .. are regarded as equally valid. Tolerance has become so important Tolerance has become so important that no exception is tolerated.” that no exception is tolerated.” –Charles Colson –Charles Colson How Now Shall We Live? (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale, 1999), 23 How Now Shall We Live? (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale, 1999), 23 Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 131. Christian Epistemology Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 132. Question What questions are postmoderns asking? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 133. Christian Epistemology Modernist Objections to Christianity 1. What about all the contradictions? 2. God is just a crutch. Religion was invented by man. 3. Jesus was just a man. 4. The Bible we have today is not the same as when it was written 2000 years ago. 5. I don’t believe in what I can’t see. 6. Evolution has proven Christianity to be wrong. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 134. Christian Epistemology 7. The Bible is a myth full of fairy tales. 8. How did Noah get all of the animals on the Ark? 9. There are no such thing as miracles. 10. Do you really believe in the story of Adam and Eve? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 135. Christian Epistemology Postmodernist Objections to Christianity 1. If God exists, why is there evil? 2. The Inquisition and the Crusades show that Christianity is oppressive. 3. Christianity is a way to God but not the only way. 4. Christianity is arrogant and exclusive. 5. How do you know that your Bible is better than other religious writings? 6. Why does God allow bad things to happen to good people? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 136. Christian Epistemology 7. What about those who have never heard? 8. The church is full of hypocrites. 9. Why would God send anyone to Hell? 10. The God of the OT is cruel, partial, and unjust. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 138. Question What is the modern view of truth? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 139. Christian Epistemology Correspondence view of truth: (1) Truth is an objective reality that exists whether someone believes it or not, (2) and that objective reality is grounded in nature. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 140. Christian Epistemology True statements are those which correspond to that objective reality. False statements are those which do not correspond to that objective reality. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 141. Christian Epistemology Law of non-contradiction applies   A ≠ -A at the same time and in the same relationship. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 142. Epistemology Key Motto Key Motto “Man can and will know all truth.” “Man can and will know all truth.” Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 143. Question What is the postmodern view of truth? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 144. Christian Epistemology Relative view of truth: (1) Truth is a perspective reality that exists in the perspective of the individual or group, (2) and that perspective reality is grounded in time. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 145. Christian Epistemology Law of non-contradiction does not apply A = -A at the same time and in the same relationship. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 146. Christian Epistemology Key Motto Key Motto “The truth cannot be known.” “The truth cannot be known.” Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 147. Christian Epistemology Religious Spin on Postmodern Epistemology Universalism: The belief that all people, good or bad, will eventually make it to Heaven. Pluralism: The belief that there are many ways to God that are equally valid. Syncretism: The assimilation of differing beliefs and practices. Inclusivism: The belief that salvation is only through Christ, but Christ may be revealed in other religions. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 148. Christian Epistemology Vatican II (1962-1965) and inclusivism “But the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the creator. In the first place among these there are the Moslems, whom professing to hold the faith of Abraham, along with us adore the one and merciful god, who on the last day will judge mankind. Those also can attain salvation who through no fault of their own do not know the gospel of Christ or his church, yet sincerely seek god and, moved by grace, strive by their deeds to do his will as it is known to them through the dictates of conscience.” Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 149. Question What is the Christian view truth? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 150. Christian Epistemology Correspondence view of truth: (1) Truth is an objective reality that exists whether someone believes it or not, (2) and that objective reality is grounded in an eternal God. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 151. Christian Epistemology The law of non-contradiction is a foundational necessity to all truth. God cannot even violate this principle since it is a logical impossibility. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 152. Christian Epistemology Key Motto Key Motto “The secret things belong to the Lord “The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but the things revealed our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our sons forever, that belong to us and to our sons forever, that we may observe all the words of this law” we may observe all the words of this law” (Deut. 29:29). (Deut. 29:29). Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 153. Christian Epistemology Christian truth must have a balance between the “things revealed” and mystery (“secret things”). Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 154. Christian Epistemology Apophadic Theology: Lit. “negative theology.” Apophadic Theology emphasizes mystery. Often called the “way of negation” (via negativa) or “negative theology,” apophadic theology sees God, and much of theology, as beyond our understanding and, therefore, beyond defining through positive assertations. Finite people cannot say what the infinite God is but only what He is not. God is “uncreated,” “immutable,” “infinite,” “immortal.” Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 155. Christian Epistemology Cataphatic Theology: Lit. “affirmative theology.” Cataphatic Theology emphasizes revelation. Often called “positive theology,” cataphatic theology seeks to understand God in positive terms, understanding that God communicates to us through language and concepts that are analogous to who and what He truly is (“analogy of language”). Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 156. Christian Epistemology Cataphatic Theology Apophatic Theology “things revealed” “secret things” Modernism West Rationalists Roman Catholic/Protestants Postmodernism East Mystics Eastern Orthodox Responsible theology
  • 158. Christian Epistemology Objectivism Prov. 23:23 Perspicuity “You who are naive, “You who are naive, discern wisdom! discern wisdom! And you fools, And you fools, understand understand discernment!” discernment!” Cataphatic Theology Apophatic Theology Soft Skepticism Perspectivism Prov. 8:5 Prov. 12:15 Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 159. Christian Epistemology Objectivism Prov. 23:23 ““The way of aa fool is The way of fool is Perspicuity Cataphatic Theology right in his own right in his own opinion, but the one who opinion, but the one who listens to advice is listens to advice is Apophatic wise.” wise.” Theology Soft Skepticism Perspectivism Prov. 8:5 Prov. 12:15 Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 160. Christian Epistemology Objectivism Prov. 23:23 Cataphatic Theology Perspicuity “Acquire truth “Acquire truth and do not sell it .. and do not sell it .. .” .” Apophatic Theology Soft Skepticism Perspectivism Prov. 8:5 Prov. 12:15 Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 161. Defining Essentials and Non-essentials Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 162. Question What truths are relative and what truths are objective? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 163. Essentials and Non-Essentials Discussion of paper “Representing Christ to a Postmodern World” Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 164. Essentials and Non-essentials Quadrant of Objectivity Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 166. True Relativity Drinking a Drinking a glass of glass of wine/beer wine/beer Going to Going to the the movies movies Situational Situational Relativity Relativity Wearing Wearing aa head head covering covering Eating Eating meat meat sacrificed sacrificed to idols to idols Home Home schooling schooling Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved. True Objectivity
  • 167. True Relativity Drinking a Drinking a glass of glass of wine/beer wine/beer Going to Going to the the movies movies Situational Situational Relativity Relativity Wearing Wearing aa head head covering covering Home Home schooling schooling Eating Eating meat meat sacrificed sacrificed to idols to idols Best kind of Best kind of food food Coke or Coke or Pepsi Pepsi Autonomous Autonomous Relativity Relativity Church Church music music Temperature Temperature of aa room (hot of room (hot or cold) or cold) Best song Best song Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved. True Objectivity
  • 168. True Relativity True Objectivity Drinking a Drinking a glass of glass of wine/beer wine/beer Going to Going to the the movies movies Situational Situational Relativity Relativity Wearing Wearing aa head head covering covering Home Home schooling schooling Eating Eating meat meat sacrificed sacrificed to idols to idols Best kind of Best kind of food food Coke or Coke or Pepsi Pepsi Non-Essential Non-Essential Objectivity Objectivity Autonomous Autonomous Relativity Relativity Church Church music music Temperature Temperature of aa room (hot of room (hot or cold) or cold) Views of Views of Predestinatio Predestinatio nn Date of Date of Christ’s Christ’s coming coming Best song Best song Young Young earth/Old earth/Old earth earth Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved. Canon of Canon of Scripture Scripture Continuation Continuation of tongues of tongues
  • 169. True Relativity True Objectivity Drinking a Drinking a glass of glass of wine/beer wine/beer Going to Going to the the movies movies Situational Situational Relativity Relativity Wearing Wearing aa head head covering covering Essential Essential Objectivity Objectivity Home Home schooling schooling Eating Eating meat meat sacrificed sacrificed to idols to idols Best kind of Best kind of food food Coke or Coke or Pepsi Pepsi Non-Essential Non-Essential Objectivity Objectivity Autonomous Autonomous Relativity Relativity Church Church music music Temperature Temperature of aa room (hot of room (hot or cold) or cold) Views of Views of Predestinatio Predestinatio nn Date of Date of Christ’s Christ’s coming coming Best song Best song Young Young earth/Old earth/Old earth earth Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved. Canon of Canon of Scripture Scripture Continuation Continuation of tongues of tongues
  • 170. True Relativity True Objectivity Drinking a Drinking a glass of glass of wine/beer wine/beer Going to Going to the the movies movies Existence of Existence of God God Situational Situational Relativity Relativity Wearing Wearing aa head head covering covering Essential Essential Objectivity Objectivity Home Home schooling schooling Eating Eating meat meat sacrificed sacrificed to idols to idols Best kind of Best kind of food food Coke or Coke or Pepsi Pepsi Non-Essential Non-Essential Objectivity Objectivity Autonomous Autonomous Relativity Relativity Church Church music music Temperature Temperature of aa room (hot of room (hot or cold) or cold) Views of Views of Predestinatio Predestinatio nn Date of Date of Christ’s Christ’s coming coming Best song Best song Young Young earth/Old earth/Old earth earth Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved. Canon of Canon of Scripture Scripture Continuation Continuation of tongues of tongues
  • 171. True Relativity Drinking a Drinking a glass of glass of wine/beer wine/beer Going to Going to the the movies movies True Objectivity Situational Situational Relativity Relativity Wearing Wearing aa head head covering covering Essential Essential Objectivity Objectivity Home Home schooling schooling Eating Eating meat meat sacrificed sacrificed to idols to idols Best kind of Best kind of food food Coke or Coke or Pepsi Pepsi Temperature Temperature of aa room (hot of room (hot or cold) or cold) Views of Views of Predestinatio Predestinatio nn Date of Date of Christ’s Christ’s coming coming Non-Essential Non-Essential Objectivity Objectivity Autonomous Autonomous Relativity Relativity Church Church music music Existence of Existence of God God Christ’s Christ’s deity deity Best song Best song Young Young earth/Old earth/Old earth earth Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved. Canon of Canon of Scripture Scripture Continuation Continuation of tongues of tongues
  • 172. True Relativity Drinking a Drinking a glass of glass of wine/beer wine/beer Going to Going to the the movies movies True Objectivity Situational Situational Relativity Relativity Wearing Wearing aa head head covering covering Essential Essential Objectivity Objectivity Home Home schooling schooling Faith Faith alone alone Best kind of Best kind of food food Eating Eating meat meat sacrificed sacrificed to idols to idols Coke or Coke or Pepsi Pepsi Date of Date of Christ’s Christ’s coming coming Temperature Temperature of aa room (hot of room (hot or cold) or cold) Views of Views of Predestinatio Predestinatio nn Non-Essential Non-Essential Objectivity Objectivity Autonomous Autonomous Relativity Relativity Church Church music music Existence of Existence of God God Christ’s Christ’s deity deity Best song Best song Young Young earth/Old earth/Old earth earth Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved. Canon of Canon of Scripture Scripture Continuation Continuation of tongues of tongues
  • 173. True Relativity Drinking a Drinking a glass of glass of wine/beer wine/beer Going to Going to the the movies movies True Objectivity Situational Situational Relativity Relativity Wearing Wearing aa head head covering covering Essential Essential Objectivity Objectivity Home Home schooling schooling Faith Faith alone alone Best kind of Best kind of food food Eating Eating meat meat sacrificed sacrificed to idols to idols Coke or Coke or Pepsi Pepsi Date of Date of Christ’s Christ’s coming coming Temperature Temperature of aa room (hot of room (hot or cold) or cold) Death, Death, burial, and burial, and resurrection resurrection of Christ of Christ Views of Views of Predestinatio Predestinatio nn Non-Essential Non-Essential Objectivity Objectivity Autonomous Autonomous Relativity Relativity Church Church music music Existence of Existence of God God Christ’s Christ’s deity deity Best song Best song Young Young earth/Old earth/Old earth earth Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved. Canon of Canon of Scripture Scripture Continuation Continuation of tongues of tongues
  • 174. True Relativity Drinking a Drinking a glass of glass of wine/beer wine/beer Going to Going to the the movies movies True Objectivity Situational Situational Relativity Relativity Wearing Wearing aa head head covering covering Essential Essential Objectivity Objectivity Home Home schooling schooling Faith Faith alone alone Best kind of Best kind of food food Eating Eating meat meat sacrificed sacrificed to idols to idols Coke or Coke or Pepsi Pepsi Date of Date of Christ’s Christ’s coming coming Temperature Temperature of aa room (hot of room (hot or cold) or cold) Death, Death, burial, and burial, and resurrection resurrection of Christ of Christ The The atonemen atonemen tt Views of Views of Predestinatio Predestinatio nn Non-Essential Non-Essential Objectivity Objectivity Autonomous Autonomous Relativity Relativity Church Church music music Existence of Existence of God God Christ’s Christ’s deity deity Best song Best song Young Young earth/Old earth/Old earth earth Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved. Canon of Canon of Scripture Scripture Continuation Continuation of tongues of tongues
  • 175. Essentials and Non-Essentials Where would you place these on the quadrant? 1. Belief in the doctrine of the Trinity? Why? 2. Smoking? Why? 3. Eating healthy and exercising? Why? 4. Getting intoxicated? Why? 5. Having your mind altered by antidepressants? Why? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 176. Question What truths are essential for orthodoxy? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 177. Essentials and Non-essentials Concentric Circle of Importance Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 178. Pure Speculation Not Important Important, but Not Essential Essential for Orthodoxy Essential for Salvation
  • 179. Essentials and Non-essentials “For the Christian, beliefs “For the Christian, beliefs matter, but not all beliefs matter, but not all beliefs matter equally .” matter equally .” –Roger Olsen –Roger Olsen Mosaic of Christian Beliefs (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2002), 33 Mosaic of Christian Beliefs (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2002), 33 Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 180. Question How certain are you about your beliefs? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 181. Essentials and Non-essentials “There are those dogmatic Christians “There are those dogmatic Christians who seem to overdefine Christianity who seem to overdefine Christianity such that being authentically such that being authentically Christian includes (for them) firm Christian includes (for them) firm adherence to a detailed set of adherence to a detailed set of extrabiblical beliefs, some of which extrabiblical beliefs, some of which are quite outside the Great Tradition are quite outside the Great Tradition itself.” itself.” –Roger Olsen –Roger Olsen Mosaic of Christian Beliefs (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2002), 33 Mosaic of Christian Beliefs (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2002), 33 Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 182. Essentials and non-essentials “Certain” (Webster’s) – Definite; fixed. – Sure to come or happen; inevitable. – Established beyond doubt or question; indisputable. – Capable of being relied on; dependable. – Having or showing confidence; assured. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 183. The Existence of God Types of Certainty 1.Mathematical certainty (scientific method) 2.Empirical certainty (weight of evidences) 3.Logical certainty (what is reasonable) 4.Moral certainty (what is demanded) Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 184. Essentials and Non-essentials Chart of Certainty Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 185. Essentials and non-essentials Chart of Certainty I Do not believe I believe 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91 0 0 – +
  • 186. Essentials and non-essentials How certain are you that . . . 1. There is a God? 2. That Christ rose from the grave? 3. That God loves you? 4. That Christ is going to come and Rapture the Church before the Great Tribulaton? 5. That Christ is coming back to reign on the earth for a thousand years? 6. That Christ is coming back? 7. That God wants you to trust that He will protect you from all physical harm? 8. That God wants you to trust that He will protect you from all emotional harm? 9. That God wants you to trust in Him in every circumstance? 10. That the Bible does not have any historical errors? 11. That Adam and Eve were real people? 12. That there was really a snake in the garden? 13. That God created the earth in seven literal days? 14. The God created the earth? 15. That Christ paid for the sins of all mankind? 16. That Christ died for you? 17. That the Apocrypha (15 books in the Roman Catholic Bible) should not be included in Scripture? 18. That the book of 3 John should be included in Scripture? 19. That the book of Genesis should be included in Scripture? 20. That the gift of tongues ceased in the first century? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 187. Essentials and Non-essentials “When you overstate, readers will be “When you overstate, readers will be instantly on guard and everything that instantly on guard and everything that has preceded your overstatement as well as has preceded your overstatement as well as everything that follows it will be suspect in everything that follows it will be suspect in their minds because they have lost their minds because they have lost confidence in your judgment or your poise. confidence in your judgment or your poise. Overstatement is one of the common faults. Overstatement is one of the common faults. A single overstatement, wherever or however A single overstatement, wherever or however it occurs, diminishes the whole, and a it occurs, diminishes the whole, and a single carefree superlative has the power to single carefree superlative has the power to destroy, for readers, the object of your destroy, for readers, the object of your enthusiasm.” enthusiasm.” –Strunk and White –Strunk and White Elements of Style, (Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon), 7. Elements of Style, (Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon), 7. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 188. Essentials and Non-Essentials “In essentials unity, in “In essentials unity, in non-essentials liberty, non-essentials liberty, in all things charity.” in all things charity.” –Rupertus Meldenius –Rupertus Meldenius Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 189. Essentials and Non-essentials Guiding Principles and Application: Application 1. Don’t divide over non-essentials no matter how convicted you are about their truth. 2. Never compromise the essentials no matter what the consequence. 3. There is no shame in being less certain about some things than others. The Bible does not teach all things with the same clarity. 4. Showing honest uncertainty about difficult issues makes your witness more authentic and powerful to a postmodern world. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 190. Traditions in Christian Theology Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 191. Question What is the essential difference in Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, and Protestantism? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 192. Traditions in Theology Traditions in Christian Theology 1. Roman Catholic 2. Eastern Orthodox 3. Protestant Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 193. Traditions in Theology Protestant Roman Catholic Orthodox 349 million 943 million 211 million Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 194. Question What is the Protestant view of Church history? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 195. Protestant View of Ecclesiastical History Formulation Gospel 100 AD 500 Corruption Loss of Gospel Restoration Protestant Church 1054 1200 Greek Orthodox 1500 Roman Catholic
  • 196. Traditions in Theology “Christianity stands or “Christianity stands or falls upon the doctrine falls upon the doctrine of justification.” of justification.” –Martin Luther –Martin Luther “Justification is the “Justification is the hinge upon which true hinge upon which true Christianity stands.” Christianity stands.” –John Calvin –John Calvin Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 197. Question What is the Roman Catholic view of Church history? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 198. Roman Catholic View of Ecclesiastical History Formulation Church 100 AD 500 Establishing Corruption of Morals Restoration Roman Catholicism 1054 1200 Greek Orthodox 1500 Protestants
  • 199. Five Bishoprics of the Early Church Rome Constantinople Antioch Jerusalem Alexandria
  • 200. Five Bishoprics of the Early Church Rome Constantinople Antioch Jerusalem Alexandria
  • 201. Rome Constantinople Antioch Invasion of Islam Invasion of Islam 612 612 Jerusalem Alexandria
  • 202. Fight for Supremacy Fight for Supremacy Split Split 1054 1054 Catholic Rome Catholic Filioque Filioque Constantinople Eastern Orthodox Eastern Orthodox
  • 203. Rome Invasion of Islam Invasion of Islam 1453 1453 Constantinople
  • 204. Rome
  • 205. Rome Eastern Church moves north. Eastern Church moves north. Russian Orthodoxy becomes primary Russian Orthodoxy becomes primary Orthodox Church. Orthodox Church.
  • 206. Question What is the Eastern Orthodox view of Church history? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 207. Eastern Orthodox View of Ecclesiastical History Formulation Church 100 AD Disruption Purification East 500 West Eastern Orthodox 1500 1200 Roman Catholics Protestants
  • 208. Question Why are there so many Protestant denominations? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 210. Brief History of the Protestant Movement Liberal Tradition Reformed Tradition s an d s s ri an nist yte me sts r i er i th alv resb efo apt Lu C P R B Charismatic Tradition Fundamentalist Tradition ts t tis hris s ap ts ns ll B of C stal es is a i n od ley -w rch teco are Arminian Tradition eth es ree hu en az M W F C P N 1500 1700 1900 Evangelical Tradition Postmodern Tradition 2000
  • 211. Sources of Theology “Where do we go for truth?” Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 212. Question What are the different sources of truth? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 213. Sources of Theology John Wesley’s Quadrilateral Tradition Scripture Reason Experience Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 214. Sources of Theology 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Tradition Reason Experience General Revelation Emotions Special Revelation (Scripture) Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 216. Sources of Theology 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Tradition Reason Experience Emotions General Revelation Special Revelation (Scripture) Stage of Truth Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved. Back Front
  • 218. Eastern Orthodox Stage of Truth Back General Revelation Experience Tradition Scripture Front Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 219. Protestant Reformation Stage of Truth Back Experience General Revelation Tradition Reason Scripture Front
  • 220. Liberal Stage of Truth Back General Revelation Emotions Experience Reason Front
  • 222. Fundamentalist Stage of Truth Back General Revelation Scripture Front
  • 223. Postmodern Stage of Truth Back Front
  • 224. Question What are the benefits and deficiencies of each source? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 225. Sources of Theology Tradition: Religious information that has been handed down to us from various sources. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 226. Sources of Theology Examples: Benefits: Deficiencies: Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 227. Sources of Theology “Tradition is the living faith of “Tradition is the living faith of those now dead. Traditionalism is those now dead. Traditionalism is the dead faith of those now living.” the dead faith of those now living.” –Jarislav Pelikan –Jarislav Pelikan Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 228. Sources of Theology Reason: Information that comes through the human mind’s capacity for logical, rational, and analytic thought. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 229. Sources of Theology Examples: Benefits: Deficiencies: Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 230. Sources of Theology “All truth is given by revelation, “All truth is given by revelation, either general or special, and it must either general or special, and it must be received by reason. Reason is the be received by reason. Reason is the God-given means for discovering the God-given means for discovering the truth that God discloses, whether in truth that God discloses, whether in his world or his Word. While God his world or his Word. While God wants to reach the heart with truth, wants to reach the heart with truth, he does not bypass the mind.” he does not bypass the mind.” –Jonathan Edwards –Jonathan Edwards Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 231. Sources of Theology “The truth of the Christian “The truth of the Christian faith surpasses the capacity faith surpasses the capacity of reason.” of reason.” –Thomas Aquinas –Thomas Aquinas Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 232. Sources of Theology credo quia absurdum “I believe because it is absurd” This Latin phrase coined by Tertullian (150-225) evidences some of the This Latin phrase coined by Tertullian (150-225) evidences some of the early Church’s disdain for the Greek philosophers’ reliance upon reason early Church’s disdain for the Greek philosophers’ reliance upon reason for truth. He said, “What does Athens have to do with Jerusalem, or the for truth. He said, “What does Athens have to do with Jerusalem, or the academy with the Church?” He sought to return the element of mystery academy with the Church?” He sought to return the element of mystery to the Christian faith. to the Christian faith.
  • 233. Sources of Theology Experience: Information that comes through direct encounter, participation, or observation. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 234. Sources of Theology Examples: Benefits: Deficiencies: Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 235. Sources of Theology Emotions: Information that comes through subjectively experienced psychological feelings. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 236. Sources of Theology Examples: Benefits: Deficiencies: Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 237. Sources of Theology sensus divinitatus “Sense of the divine” The sensus divinitatus is the inward persuasion all people have that directs The sensus divinitatus is the inward persuasion all people have that directs them to aabelief in God and aapropensity to worship. While the sensus them to belief in God and propensity to worship. While the sensus divinitatas can contribute to and shape our theology (natural theology), divinitatas can contribute to and shape our theology (natural theology), the information is insufficient to bring aaperson into aaright relationship the information is insufficient to bring person into right relationship with God. with God.
  • 238. Sources of Theology General Revelation: Revelation about God given through the created order (Ps. 19:1–6 ; Rom. 1:18–20; 2:14–15). Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 239. Sources of Theology Examples: Benefits: Deficiencies: Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 240. Sources of Theology Special Revelation: Revelation given by God’s supernatural intervention in history through (1) miraculous events, (2) divine speech, and (3) visible manifestations. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 241. Sources of Theology Examples: Benefits: Deficiencies: Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 242. Sources of Theology norma normans sed non normata “A norm which norms but is not normed” This is aaLatin phrase of the Protestant Reformation that stresses the This is Latin phrase of the Protestant Reformation that stresses the importance of Scripture above all other sources of theology. The importance of Scripture above all other sources of theology. The Scripture, according to the Reformers, is the standard (norm) against Scripture, according to the Reformers, is the standard (norm) against which all other sources for theology must be judged, but this standard which all other sources for theology must be judged, but this standard cannot be judged by them. cannot be judged by them.
  • 243. Proposed Stage of Truth Back Experience Emotions General Revelation Tradition Reason Scripture Front
  • 244. Question How do the different sources interact to form our theology? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 245. Tradition Tradition Reason Reason Emotions Emotions General Revelation General Revelation Experience Experience 2 Theological Statement . “What is the timeless truth taught?” . “What did it mean then?” • • • • Historical interpretation Grammatical interpretation Contextual interpretation Literary Interpretation Ancient Audience Ancient Audience 1 Exegetical Statement Contemporary Audience Timeless Audience Time-bound Audience 3 Homiletical Statement . “How does it apply to us?”
  • 246. Subjectiv e Objectiv e •Tradition •Reason •Experience •Emotions •General Revelation Acts 17:11 These Jews were more open-minded than those in Thessalonica, for they eagerly received the message, examining the Scriptures carefully every day to see if these things were so.
  • 247. Excursus: Does God still Speak Today? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 248. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? Has Special Revelation ceased, or does God still communicate to people through prophets, dreams, visions, and audible encounters? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 249. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? Three positions: 1. Continuationism 2. Hard Cessationism 3. Soft Cessationism Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 250. Temporary Gifts Supernatural Sign Permanent Gifts Speaking Confirmator Revelatory y • • • • • • • Apostleship • Prophecy • Discerning of • spirits Word of wisdom Word of knowledge Tongues Interpretation of tongues Healings Miracles Tongues • • • • Evangelism Teaching Pastorteacher Exhortation Serving • • • • • Service Showing Mercy Giving Administration Helps
  • 251. Question What is the Continuationist view of Prophecy? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 252. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? Continuationism: View that miraculous sign gifts are still being given and, therefore, God still speaks directly in various ways today. Adherents: Wayne Grudem, Jack Deere, Craig Keener, Jack Hayford Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 253. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? Defense of Continuationism: Continuationism Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 254. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? 1. Acts 2:14-21 seems to teach that supernatural occurrences such as tongues and prophecy would be normative for the Church era. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 255. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? 2. The entire book of Acts seems to show that the supernatural gifts are common within the Church. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 256. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? 3. All of Scripture supports the idea that it is God’s nature to work in supernatural ways. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 257. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? 4. The New Testament never explicitly states that the supernatural sign gifts would cease. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 258. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? “If you were to lock a “If you were to lock a brand-new Christian in a brand-new Christian in a room with a Bible and tell him room with a Bible and tell him to study what Scripture has to to study what Scripture has to say about healings and say about healings and miracles, he would never come miracles, he would never come out of the room a out of the room a cessationist.” cessationist.” –Jack Deere –Jack Deere Surprised by the Power of the Spirit (Grand Rapids, Mi: Zondervan, 1997), 54 (Grand Rapids, Mi: Zondervan, 1997), 54 Surprised by the Power rights reserved. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. Allof the Spirit
  • 259. Question What is the Hard Cessationist view of Prophecy? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 260. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? Hard Cessationism: View that miraculous sign gifts ceased with the death of the last apostle and the completion of the New Testament. Therefore, God does not speak directly to people today. Adherents: Charles Hodge, John MacArthur, majority of Church history Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 261. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? Defense of Hard Cessationism: Cessationism Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 262. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? 1. The Bible implicitly supports the idea that the supernatural sign gifts were for the establishment of the Church era. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 263. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? Eph. 2:19-20 “So then you are no longer foreigners and noncitizens, but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of God’s household, because you have been built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the cornerstone.” Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 264. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? 2 Cor. 12:12 “Indeed, the signs of an apostle were performed among you with great perseverance by signs and wonders and powerful deeds.” Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 265. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? Heb. 2:3-4 “How will we escape if we neglect such a great salvation? It was first communicated through the Lord and was confirmed to us by those who heard him, while God confirmed their witness with signs and wonders and various miracles and gifts of the Holy Spirit distributed according to his will.” Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 266. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? 1 Cor. 13:8-10 •“Love never ends. But if there are prophecies, they will be set aside; if there are tongues, they will cease; if there is knowledge, it will be set aside. For we know in part and we prophesy in part; but when the perfect comes, the partial will be done away.” ” Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 267. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? 2. It is agreed that the Bible never explicitly states that the sign gifts have ceased. But the Bible never explicitly states that Scripture is complete, yet both cessetionists and non-cessetionists agree that it is. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 268. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? 3. If God is still speaking supernaturally through prophecy, tongues, word of wisdom, etc., then the Canon of Scripture is still open. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 269. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? “It might, indeed, be a priori conceivable “It might, indeed, be a priori conceivable that God should deal with men that God should deal with men [individually], and reveal Himself and [individually], and reveal Himself and His will to each individual, throughout the His will to each individual, throughout the whole course of history, in the [depths] of whole course of history, in the [depths] of his own consciousness. This is the mystics his own consciousness. This is the mystics dream. It has not, however, been God’s dream. It has not, however, been God’s way. He has chosen rather to deal with the way. He has chosen rather to deal with the race in its entirety, and to give this race race in its entirety, and to give this race His complete revelation of Himself in an His complete revelation of Himself in an organic whole.” organic whole.” –B.B. Warfield –B.B. Warfield Counterfeit Miracles (Carlisle, PN: Banner of Truth, 1972), 26 Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved. Counterfeit Miracles (Carlisle, PN: Banner of Truth, 1972), 26
  • 270. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? 4. If one were to examine the Scripture closely, it becomes evident that God’s direct intervention through prophecy and supernatural signs and wonders was not the norm as it may seem. The Bible, as theological history (not exhaustive history), only records the times when God does intervene, thereby giving the impression that God’s direct encounters through prophets, dreams, visions, etc. are God’s modus operandi when they are not. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 271. Noah 2000+ yrs of apparent silence 50 Elijah & Elisha fa o rs 0y t si ren a pp Moses e nc le 900 yrs of apparent silence Christ and The Apostles
  • 272. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? 5. History convincingly suggests that the supernatural sign gifts have ceased. We do not see evidence of confirmed prophets after the death of the last apostle. Only fringe groups here and there have claimed that God still speaks through prophets, tongues, etc., until the 20th century when the charismatic revival began. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 273. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? “This whole place [1 Cor. 12 on “This whole place [1 Cor. 12 on spiritual gifts] is very spiritual gifts] is very obscure .. .. .. but the obscurity is obscure but the obscurity is produced by our ignorance of the produced by our ignorance of the facts referred to and by their facts referred to and by their cessation, being such as then cessation, being such as then used to occur, but now no longer used to occur, but now no longer take place.” take place.” –John Chrysostom (347-407) –John Chrysostom (347-407) ECF 2.12.1.1.29.0 ECF 2.12.1.1.29.0 Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 274. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? “In the earliest time the Holy Ghost fell “In the earliest time the Holy Ghost fell upon them that believed: and they spoke upon them that believed: and they spoke with tongues which they had not learned ‘as with tongues which they had not learned ‘as the Spirit gave them utterance.’ These were the Spirit gave them utterance.’ These were signs adapted to the time. For it was proper signs adapted to the time. For it was proper for the Holy Spirit to evidence Himself in for the Holy Spirit to evidence Himself in all tongues, and to show that the Gospel of all tongues, and to show that the Gospel of God had come to all tongues [languages] God had come to all tongues [languages] over the whole earth. The thing was done for over the whole earth. The thing was done for a authentication and it passed away.” a authentication and it passed away.” –St. Augustine (354-430) –St. Augustinethe(354-430) Ten Homilies on first Epistle of John VI, 10 Ten Homilies on the first Epistle of John VI, 10 Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 275. Question What is the Soft Cessationist view of Prophecy? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 276. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? Soft Cessationism: Adherents: Or “Soft Continuationist.” The view that the miraculous sign gifts could still be given today, but believers need to be careful about outright acceptance of people’s claims of possession. D. A. Carson, Robert Saucy Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 277. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? Defense of Soft Cessationism: Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 278. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? 1. Neither side’s arguments are conclusive. We must therefore proceed with great caution. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 279. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? 2. While it may be true that Church history has not seen the continuation of God speaking directly, this does not mean that it is not possible. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 280. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? “God, in his ordinary providence, “God, in his ordinary providence, makes use of means, yet is free makes use of means, yet is free to work without, above, and to work without, above, and against them, at his pleasure.” against them, at his pleasure.” –Westminster Confession of –Westminster Confession of Faith Faith 5.3 5.3 Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 281. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? 3. Those who adhere to a futuristic interpretation of Revelation must concede that there are going to be prophets in the future as represented by the Two Witnesses (Rev. 11:3) and, possibly, the 144,000 Israelites (Rev. 7:4). Therefore, we must be open to further direct revelation from God. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 282. Excursus: Does God Still Speak Today? Guiding Principles: Principles 1. God’s Word is not something to be trifled with (Ex. 20:7). 2. If you are a prophet, you must show convincing signs of a prophet (Deut 18:15-22). 3. If you are a prophet, you must have orthodox theology (Deut. 13:1-3). 4. If someone believes that they have a word from the Lord, they had better be certain and be ready to live by the consequences if it turns out false. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 283. Unity and Diversity Doing Theology in the Emerging Context Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 284. Unity and Diversity How do we do theology in our emerging context? Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 285. Unity and Diversity semper reformanda “Always reforming” This is the Reformation principle that Christian theology is always This is the Reformation principle that Christian theology is always undergoing change, enhancement, and development. the Reformers undergoing change, enhancement, and development. the Reformers understood that if theology was, at any point, thought to be solidified understood that if theology was, at any point, thought to be solidified and one person’s, group’s, tradition’s, or denomination’s perspective and one person’s, group’s, tradition’s, or denomination’s perspective was thought of to be “above all reproach” and, therefore, unable to be was thought of to be “above all reproach” and, therefore, unable to be developed, the task of doing theology would be severely grieved. Our developed, the task of doing theology would be severely grieved. Our theology must be reforming itself continually. theology must be reforming itself continually.
  • 286. Unity and Diversity Apostles’ Creed I believe in God the Father, Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth And in Jesus Christ, his only begotten Son, our Lord Who was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary Suffered under Pontius Pilate; was crucified, dead and buried; He descended into the grave The third day he rose again from the dead He ascended into heaven, and sits at the right hand of God the Father Almighty From thence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead I believe in the Holy Ghost I believe a holy catholic church; the communion of saints The forgiveness of sins The resurrection of the body And the life everlasting. Amen. Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 287. Unity and Diversity Unity and Diversity among the Traditions Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 288. Unity and Diversity Doctrine of Man and Grace (fifth century) Doctrine of Christ Definition of Chalcedon (451) Trinity (325) Counsel of Nicea (325) 100 A.D. 400 A.D. Doctrine of the Atonement (eleventh century) 1100 A.D. 1600 A.D. 2000 A.D.
  • 289. Unity and Diversity Unity and Diversity among Protestant Denominations Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 290. Unity and Diversity Five “Solas” of the Protestant Reformation Reformed Understanding Meaning Sola Scriptura Sola Christus The “Scripture alone” contains primary authority to dictate the lives of believers. The work of “Christ alone” is the basis for justification. Sola Gratia Justification is by means of God’s “grace alone.” Sola Fide Sola deo Gloria “Faith alone” is the only instrumental cause of justification. All is done for “God’s glory alone.”
  • 291. Unity and Diversity Doctrine of Man and Grace (fifth century) Doctrine of Christ Definition of Chalcedon (451) Trinity (325) Counsel of Nicea (325) 100 A.D. 400 A.D. Doctrine of Scripture (sixteenth century) Doctrine of Justification (sixteenth century) Doctrine of the Atonement (eleventh century) 1100 A.D. 1600 A.D. 2000 A.D.
  • 292. Unity and Diversity Unity and Diversity among the Sexes Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 293. Unity and Diversity Unity and Diversity among the Nations Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 294. Unity and Diversity Unity and Diversity among the Peoples Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.
  • 295. Unity and Diversity Luke 8:5-18 Copyright © 2004, The Theology Program. All rights reserved.

Notas do Editor

  1. Teacher’s Notes Information Page This notes section is to inform those who would choose to teach this course using the material provided by The Theology Program. Any and all teachers, professors, and pastors are welcome to use TTP material for the purpose of instructing people in the individual courses or through the entire program. It should be noted, however, that each set of notes, PowerPoint presentations, and assignments assumes knowledge of the previous course according to the program schedule (see program schedule on www.theologyprogram.com). It is our hope that TTP material would be of benefit to those whose purpose it is teach theology at a level greater than that which is readily available though self-study or the typical Bible studies. PowerPoint Slides and Notes: The PowerPoint notes provided have the teacher in mind. They are not meant to be an exhaustive source of information on the topic covered. Neither are they meant to answer all of the questions that may come up during the presentation. What we hope to accomplish with the notes section is to give the teacher a basic understanding of what the individual slide is trying to accomplish along with some additional information on the subject of the slide. The notes will be kept as brief as possible and contain the following types of information: Explanation of Slide: Explanations of what the slide is trying to accomplish. (Most of the time we hope that this is self-evident). Presentation notes: Expanded subject information including definitions of terms with which we feel the teacher may not be acquainted. Also, there may be suggested illustrations for the topic being discussed. Activity: Sometimes the slides are created with a particular learning activity in mind and are non-productive without this activity. If this is the case, a suggested activity will be explained. Sometimes the activities are suggested and left up to the teacher’s discretion. References: This will contain references that were used in the slide and suggested references for further study on the subject. Keep in mind that some of the slides are self-explanatory and, therefore, do not need notes. The teacher is expected to have watched the video of the class being taught so that he can get a better idea of what is trying to be accomplished. Student Notes: The student notes are created to coincide interactively with the PowerPoint slides. Some will have all the information contained in the slides, and some will simply be a blank page so that the student can draw the chart or illustration that is represented on the slide. We have intentionally left much space in the student notes so that the student can take lecture notes. Fonts: Along with standard fonts such as Times New Roman, these are the fonts that are used in all The Theology Program material. If you do not already have them, they can be downloaded from our web-site. It is highly recommended that you use these in all the materials since changing the fonts will affect the format of the notes and PowerPoint. If you change the fonts, it will be necessary for you to reformat the lines and paragraphs of all of the material. Bradley Hand ITC Calligrapher 2. Brush Script MT 3. Perpetua Titling MT 4. Perpetua
  2. Explanation of Slide: This is simply an introductory slide that may or may not be explained. You might speak about the importance of knowing God. You cannot love someone unless you know them. Hopefully, you will have read Love Your God with All Your Mind by J.P. Moreland. This book details much of the philosophy of TTP program and gives us motivation to love God with our mind, as well as understanding of how this is accomplished.
  3. Presentation Notes: These are the twenty-three primary questions that will be addressed in this course. They will serve as an outline for the course.
  4. Presentation Notes: The primary purpose of the following slides is to use humor to put people at ease concerning the rationale for taking this course. While the examples are given comically, they truly are representative of first-time students of TTP.
  5. Presentation Notes: This is the attitude of many. They need to be encouraged, and their fear needs to be taken seriously, since they truly believe that they are not smart and cannot learn at this level.
  6. Presentation Notes: This type of person can cause much frustration and take over the entire class if you are not careful. The goal is not to keep him quite, but to challenge him through the conversation of the community.
  7. Presentation Notes: This type of person is very set in his ways. He will not open his mind until you help change his way of thinking. We hope to do that in this course.
  8. Presentation Notes: We will use, and expect the student to become aware of, issues in theology and theological terminology that will be new to most. We will not cover issues that amount to academic “busy work” and that are not essential to becoming well informed with issues that impact our spiritual walk with God.
  9. Presentation Notes: The idea is that the further you move to the left, the less you can count on people’s faithful attendance.
  10. Presentation Notes: The Sunday sermon can and does contribute to a person’s theology, but this type of teaching and exhortation is limited in what it can actually accomplish in helping people take ownership of their understanding of the Bible and theology.
  11. Illustration: In order to demonstrate this, ask people what they learned in last Sunday’s sermon. You don’t necessarily need to have them answer out loud since there will always be one or two people who can recall it to their mind and then seemingly prove your point wrong. Then ask them what they learned last week in teacher training course. They will more than likely be able to recall more of last Saturday’s lesson than Sunday’s sermon.
  12. Presentation Notes: This is often referred to as the “Power of the Pulpit.” People sense more of the immediate presence of God in a passive learning environment such as a Sunday sermon. In these situations, people not able to argue, discuss, or debate the issues are more likely to let God speak directly to them and, therefore, tend to experience more conviction and short-term life change.
  13. Illustration: Ask your students whether they are receiving all of these types of teaching in their lives. Ask them if they are in balance. Most people rely upon the Sunday sermon to give them all of their spiritual education, when, because of its nature, it can only accomplish a small part.
  14. Presentation Notes: We realize that there is a time and a need for each of these methods to be emphasized. The arrows represent the goal of The Theology Program to utilize all methods of doing theology, always beginning with and bent toward our irenic approach. There will be times when we are very polemic in our approach. As well, there will be apologetic elements to all that we do. But this all must be done with an irenic spirit. This evidences our assumption that people, even those with whom we disagree strongly, have reasons for their beliefs, and these reasons need to be examined as objectively as possible. If we are not able to do this, we are not teaching but are indoctrinating. Ironically, this is also the ancient symbol for the Trinity. How can we go wrong with this approach! Illustration (1): The often-used illustration of the counterfeit dollar bill helps people to understand what we are not. The illustration goes like this: Those who deal with money are trained to spot counterfeits. Rather than studying the different types of counterfeits, their training involves studying the real thing. Moral: We should only study good theology so that we can spot bad theology when it crosses our path. Besides the fact that this illustration is not true of bankers, it is really not true of theology. First of all, how does one know what true theology is? You must start with an assumption that dictates the entire process. The assumption is that the theology you have started with (the true dollar bill) is the exact representation of the truth. This is more than any of us can say, since we are all biased by our perspective. We need the community of God to help us continually shape our theology. The dollar bill approach evidences a purely polemic and modernistic Christian mindset. This approach, we hope, is more relevant and persuasive. Illustration (2) As well, this can be illustrated in modern American politics. It is very polemical in nature. Neither side ever wants to acknowledge any good on the opposing side, whether in motives or beliefs. The more credible politicians will give due credit to the opposing parties position, while at the same time having strong convictions against them.
  15. Presentation Notes: This chart describes the progression of courses in The Theology Program. It is suggested that the student take the courses in the suggested order, but this is not a requirement. Introduction to Theology is the prerequisite to all other courses because it gives us the “rules of engagement” for doing theology. The reason why this is different is because we focus only on these seven courses. Many Bible institutes contain so many courses (albeit good courses) that people don’t know what courses to take. There is no pastor guidance. This program is very intentional in its progression of courses. Each class assumes knowledge of the previous courses. This is the pastoral element to The Theology Program. When the program was designed, we asked ourselves, What is it that the Church needs the most? We saw many good Bible studies going on in many places, but we did not see a place where people could learn to do theology. We did not see a place where people were taught to think. Since the public school system is not doing this, and we did not see any high-quality intention programs available to the Church, we thought that we would do what we could to fill this gap.
  16. Presentation Notes: It is important to note that TTP covers only the relevant issues in historic, systematic, and contemporary theology of which we believe people need to be aware, so that they can be well informed; this makes the program comprehensive.
  17. Presentation Notes: People understand things differently depending on their culture, personality, personal history, and their situation in life. Different people will understand things differently and, therefore, will contribute to the community in different ways. If we were to study theology alone, we would be greatly deficient in our understanding and perspective, and we would become unnecessarily bigoted, exclusive, and isolated from the larger Body of Christ.
  18. Activity: Group discussion Have people separate into groups of 5–10 people to discuss the questions found in the student notes. Make sure that each group has a leader who is familiar with the material and able to keep the discussion on track. The discussion groups should last no longer than 45 minutes.
  19. Activity: Neighbor Nudge Have people break into groups of two and come up with an answer to this question. The goal here is to get people to come to an agreement on a definition that is VERY broad so that everyone understands that ALL people have a theology of one sort or another. If we started with a Christian definition of theology, it might look something like this: “The study of God through the revelation contained in Scripture.” But this would exclude people of other religions who do have a theology, just not one defined as ours. It would also exclude the atheist, who also has a theology which is founded on the denial of the existence of God. This early in the course, you need to try to keep the definition broad and inclusive. Our definition: Theology is a belief system concerning deity.
  20. Presentation Notes: Illustrate this point by using someone who you would not have expected to ask “ultimate questions.” Children always make good illustrations because they ask these questions early in life, especially when introduced to death. When my daughter Katelynn was two, our rabbit named Anselm (I was in charge of naming the rabbit!) died. When we buried it, Katelynn was confused and asked many unsolicited questions like: “Where did he go?” “Why did he die?” “Why do things have to die?” These are all theological questions from a two-year-old! All people are theologically inquisitive. Students may say that some people do not have a theology because they believe that matters of theology are beyond us, being too difficult for finite minds to fathom or understand. But this in itself is a theology. This person’s theology would be that matters of theology are beyond us. No one can escape the fact that they have a theology and are, therefore, in some sense, a theologian.
  21. Activity: Group discussion Have people discuss what Sproul means when he says that we live in the most anti-intellectual period in the history of the west. Ask them if they agree with this. Ask them how the church evidences this anti-intellectualism. This quote can create some great discussion if you give the students time. Reference: R.C. Sproul, “Burning Hearts Are Not Nourished by Empty Heads,” Christianity Today 26 (Sept. 3, 1982), 100.
  22. References: These categories are taken from Stanley J. Grenz and Roger E. Olson Who Needs Theology? (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 1996). Presentation Notes: These are five different arenas in which people can conduct their theology. Each person primarily does theology in one of these five arenas. Our goal in the next few slides is to help people move out of the tabloid and folk theology arenas. Only when this is accomplished will they truly be able to know why they believe what they believe. If people remain tabloid and folk theologians, they will be unable to learn anything new, since they will believe something only if they already agree with it. To folk theologians, whether a teacher is good or bad depends on how much the teacher agrees with them. This will be explained more in the following slides.
  23. Activity: Group discussion Stop at this point and have the people discuss more examples of Tabloid theology.
  24. Presentation Notes: Look to the video for explanation of these examples.
  25. Activity: Group discussion Stop at this point and have the people discuss examples of Folk theology. You need to take a lot of time with this one. You will get a lot of great answers if you give the students time. Don’t reveal your example until they have had time to come up with theirs. Guide them through this discussion to a greater understanding of the fact that every individual has a lot of Folk theology in them. It is VERY IMPORTANT to point out that there is incorrect and correct Folk theology. We may have learned from childhood through the traditions passed on to us that man is created in the image of God. This is true. This theology becomes Folk theology if the person does not know what it means to be created in the image of God or, if they do know what it means, they cannot tell you why it is true nor defend it in any way. Folk theology is something that we have believed but don’t know why we have believed it. When defined this way, it creates a lot of healthy tension and conviction with the group to become better acquainted with what they already “know.”
  26. Activity: Group Discussion Stop at this point and have the people discuss examples of Folk theology.
  27. Activity: Group Discussion Before you reveal the Demon possession slide, ask people this question: “What people, throughout all of history, would you think are most likely to have been demon possessed?” Most people will answer with Hitler, Stalin, or Manson. Why? Because they were evil, cunning, and killed a lot of people. Ask the people where they got the idea that being evil, cunning, and killing people was criteria for demon possession. The people in the Bible who were said to have a demon never went about killing people. Those in the NT were mad and isolationists. They were never out trying to take over the world or committing mass murders. I am not saying that Hitler or Stalin or any of the others were not demonized, but it is certainly not a foregone conclusion. The Bible has very little to say about the activity of demons in relation to man. I think that it is best to remain unsure as to the exact influence behind their mischief, understanding that man, without the devil, is very evil at heart (Jer. 17:9).
  28. Activity: Group discussion Stop at this point and have the people discuss this question. Basically, most learning calls for deconstruction of unfounded beliefs (Folk theology). This, if the beliefs have been foundational, causes a paradigm shift in people’s thinking and affects everything in their lives. If a person has much of their personality and time invested in these beliefs, it becomes too great a loss to consider change. For example, Mormons have much of their lives invested in the practice of their beliefs (e.g.,, door-to-door evangelism). Therefore, to call into question their most basic beliefs about salvation (i.e., that if you evangelize enough, you can be saved) and to have them actually consider that they are wrong is, to them, the same as asking them to consider that their lives, efforts, and hopes are all wrong. For this reason, Folk theology is difficult to deconstruct.
  29. Presentation Notes: We would hope that the Church is moving people in a direction away from Folk theology to more reflective theology. A doctrine of essentiality is an understanding of the essentials of the Christian faith. The ability to distinguish the difference in minor issues (e.g.,, views about the rapture) and major issues (e.g.,, deity of Christ). This is a move away from legalism. We are going to formulate a doctrine of essentiality in this course. The assigned paper, “Representing Christ to a Postmodern World,” covers this in much more detail.
  30. Presentation Notes: In our view, this is the place that our students need to be. One of the greatest changes that we can bring about in our students is to teach them to critique their own theology with honesty and humility. This will be done throughout the program by challenging many people’s beliefs and seeing if they stand up to the most intense scrutiny. If they don’t stand up, maybe we should give them up! This is a difficult mind-set to instill in anyone, including ourselves. But if we are to truly be growing in Christ and in our knowledge of Him, we have to have this philosophy. At the very least, it is a non-negotiable for The Theology Program; therefore, much time needs to be devoted to this topic. Theological methodology is what we are doing now and what we will continue to do throughout this course. While lay theologians are willing to use study tools, they usually do not have the ability to read critically, thinking that anything “religious” is worth reading. The ministerial theologian, on the other hand, reads critically, knowing that not all “religious” or “Christian” material has equal worth. Ministerial theologians become familiar with publishing companies, authors, and subjects that are more relevant than others. The ability to critique one’s own theology against other valid options, interpretations, and perspectives is invaluable to the continued construction of theology. Ministerial theologians will read widely in their area of study, examining the best claims of those with whom they do not agree, allowing their claims to change or alter their views if necessary. Theological integration is another way of saying that the ministerial theologian will create a “systematic theology.” To do so, as will be explained later, is to integrate new knowledge with old and, if necessary, to reshape the new in light of the old.
  31. Presentation Notes: Examples: Professors at seminaries and universities. Charles Ryrie J. I. Packer William Craig J. P. Moreland Dan Wallace The list could go on and on. We are greatly indebted to the Professional theologians who study and research with pastors and teachers in mind. They may not make it to the pulpit or the Sunday school room very often, but much of our learning and teaching is the result of their faithful dedication in the study. Didactically: Oriented toward teaching.
  32. Presentation Notes: It is not uncommon today to hear preachers say that studies in theology quench what the Spirit is trying to do in people’s lives. Therefore, many come down on the “theologians,” blaming them for the creation of a spiritless academic Christianity. But this simply is not true. The individual is responsible for acting on the truth system which he builds. One thing that is true is that a person cannot act on what he or she does not know. Orthodoxy (right teaching) is a prerequisite to orthopraxy (right practice). Nothing could be clearer in Scripture. Do not let yourself or your student create a false dichotomy between the mind and the spirit, the Bible does not recognize the difference. The book “Love the Lord with All Your Mind” by J. P. Moreland covers this well.
  33. Presentation Notes: This type of theology usually follows a liberal academic status quo, although there are exceptions. Keep in mind that we are not in any way saying that anyone who teaches academic theology is an academic theologian in the sense that we are using the term. The way that we are using it is for those who truly represent an unspiritual academia, not because of the nature or depth of the studies, but because of the motivation and results of the studies. Academic theologians are devoid of any purpose of spiritual edification. This is just as unacceptable as folk theology.
  34. Activity: Group discussion Stop at this point and have the people discuss examples of academic theology. Examples: Liberal Theologians who have no spiritual purpose to their studies. People who study and research only for academic standing or approval.
  35. Activity: Prayer This might be a good place to stop and pray that you and your class approach this subject with humility and fear.
  36. Activity: Group discussion Have people answer this question. My answers are contained on the following slides. This slide is intended to bring more relevance to our study.
  37. Presentation Notes: Explain each of these. You can substitute you own. Here are my explanations: The moment we begin thinking about God, we are, by definition, doing theology. Your views of soteriology and the sovereignty of God will affect how you share the Gospel. An Arminian might be more concerned about the urgency and persuasiveness with which he must present the Gospel, while one who is more Calvinistic may be more relaxed while sharing the Gospel, placing more confidence in the Spirit to do the necessary work of opening the person’s ears. Your view of inspiration and inerrancy will definitely affect how you interpret Scripture. Your view of the providence of God will affect how you act when you get sick. Is God in control, or is this something that He does not want in your life? Is a person to mount a rational defense for the faith, or is faith something that does not need rational arguments? Your theology will determine your future plans. Your views about the Christian and culture will influence whether or not you home school or choose public school. The person with the “kingdom of priests” mentality may see public schools as a necessary choice for their children to be prepared for outreach. The person with the “holy nation” attitude may see home schooling as a necessary choice for their children to be sanctified from the world.
  38. Presentation Notes: Our theology will influence the way we vote, because it is very difficult to separate politics from morality and it is impossible to separate morality from theology. Our theology will influence our battle against sin. Do we have a “let go, let God” mentality, or do we battle sin by taking responsibility for our actions and by changing patterns in our life? Or is it somewhere in the middle? Our theology will help us in our marriage. Do we believe that God has the perfect person out there for us, and it is our job to find him or her? If we do not find “Mr. Right” or “Ms. Right,” have we shortchanged ourselves by not waiting for “God’s best”? Or do we see that “God’s best” may not have to meet our criteria and that it may be God’s will for us to have trouble in our marriage?
  39. Presentation Notes: This is not to assume that each person in your class is a believer, since the program is open to all who want to learn. But, nonetheless, this is the definition of theology that we will use for the program. Someone has once well said that we are saved in a moment in time, then we spend the rest of our lives discovering what happened at that moment.
  40. Activity: Group discussion Have people separate into groups of 5-10 people to discuss the questions found in the student notes. Make sure that each group has a leader that is familiar with the material and able to keep the discussion on track. The discussion groups should last no longer than 45 minutes.
  41. Presentation Notes: Give a brief definition of all of these categories. Systematic Theology: A system of studying theology which draws from all sources of revelation in order to come to systematic conclusions about what has been revealed about the various theological disciplines. Biblical Theology: A system of studying theology that uses the Bible as its only source. Biblical theology can be done by looking at particular books, testaments, theology of a particular author, or the Bible as a whole. Historical Theology: A system of studying theology that uses Church history as its primary source. Historical theology studies the struggle, development, and articulation of doctrine throughout history. Creedal/Dogmatic Theology: A system of studying theology which uses creedal statements of faith from particular Christian institutions such as the Westminster Confession of Faith or the Council of Trent. Apologetic Theology: A system of studying theology that is focused on defending the truth of Christianity to unbelievers. Philosophical Theology: A system of studying theology that uses reason and general revelation as its primary source. Most arguments for the existence of God would be classified as philosophical theology. It is very important that you communicate that The Theology Program is a systematic theology program. It uses all of the categories of theology, since all are valuable.
  42. Presentation Notes: Trinitarianism is more properly understood as the study of all three members of the Trinity, which would include Christology, Pneumatology, and Paterology (the study of the Father).
  43. Explanation of Slide: This slide is to further distinguish between biblical and systematic theology. Presentation Notes: It is important to note that students may draw the conclusion that biblical theology is better than systematic since it is “biblical,” seeking the Bible as its only source. This, however, is a misunderstanding since systematic theology uses the Bible as its primary resource, recognizing that it is the only infallible resource available. This concept will be covered in greater detail later in the “Sources for Theology” section. Dan Wallace’s comments about this slide helps us to avoid pitfalls in these descriptions: “The description of biblical theology seems a bit negative. The key here is that biblical theology begins with the author’s categories, emphases, and situation. It also shows us progressive revelation, the unfolding drama of redemption. It is vital to do biblical theology as a prerequisite to systematic theology since we have to know what the authors could have known at the time they wrote before we can assess how their writings contribute to an overall scheme. Further, since the Incarnation occurred in time-space history, since the Bible is not a systematic theology, it is imperative that we look at the data in their historical contexts first. Although we may end up with Chalcedonian-colored readings of the text, this is not the place to start.”
  44. Presentation Notes: This slide helps guide people in understanding the difference between exegesis, theology, and homiletics or application. This process is often referred to as the homiletical process. We will return to this slide many times throughout the program.
  45. Activity: Group discussion Ask people to think of what it looks like when theology is done only with the ancient audience, with no regard for the timeless or contemporary audience. What type of groups would practice biblical interpretation this way?
  46. Presentation Notes: The answer is people who have no regard for timeless truth and have no intention of applying it to their personal lives. This would be the consistent method of a liberal, atheist, or agnostic. This is the way that practical atheists live their lives. There is no timeless truth that would bind them, and there are no morals to dictate their actions.
  47. Activity: Group discussion Ask people to consider what it looks like when theology is constructed with no sources and no application.
  48. Activity: Group discussion Ask people to consider what it looks like when theology is constructed with no sources, no eternal truth, only subjective application.
  49. Presentation Notes: This represents a postmodern approach to theology. This is very common today in an age when the greatest desire is to be tolerant and accepting. This is the “unity-at-the-expense-of-truth” theology.
  50. Activity: Group discussion Ask people to think of what it looks like when application is taken directly from the ancient audience with no regard for the theological. What type of groups would practice biblical interpretation this way? There are many groups who believe that this is the way of interpreting the Bible that has the most integrity. It is the “the-Bible-says-it-let’s-do-it” mentality. It is a misguided piety that thinks application is to be taken directly out of the ancient audience with little or no regard for the customs of the ancient culture. In this method, there is no extraction of principle and no thought of how each principle applies uniquely in each culture. An example of this would be those churches who read 1 Cor. 11:6 and make it mandatory for women to wear head covering, even when, in their culture, it has no significance outside the church. The act is performed even though the principle does not carry over. In the ancient world, women who did not wear head covering were rebelling against their God-ordained roles as women. This is not what head coverings symbolize today. The principle that needs to be extracted is that women need to understand and appreciate their roles as women. The way this might be applied today is to say that married women should take the last name of their husbands. Another example would be that of churches who do not allow musical instruments in their church because the New Testament does not mention musical instruments. This is the direct application of a misinterpretation of the New Testament that does not take into account systematic theology.
  51. Activity: Group discussion Ask people to think of what it looks like when theology is taken from the Scriptures with no regard for application. What type of groups would practice biblical interpretation this way? This method of doing theology is practiced by many churches whose focus is on Bible study and good theology, but who provide no avenues for application.
  52. Activity: Group discussion Ask people to think of what it looks like when theology is done in reverse order—when theology is taken from subjective personal opinion and then read into Scripture. Presentation Notes: This represents a subjective method of doing theology. The biblical hermeneutic employed here is called reader-response. With reader-response, there is no concern with the original intent of the authors, only a concern with what the text means to the individual (subject) who is currently reading. This hermeneutic is not limited to the Scriptures. It is common in all areas of literature from Shakespeare to Sir Conan Doyle. It is also common in history, politics, and the judicial system. The best example of this would be the current reinterpretation of the Constitution of the United States, where judges are employing the reader-response method of interpretation to the implementation of the law.
  53. Activity: Group discussion Ask people to think of what it looks like when theology is done in reverse order—when theology is taken from subjective personal opinion and then read into Scripture. Presentation Notes: Eisegesis, as opposed to exegesis, is to interpret Scripture by reading your own preconceived theology into the text. This represents a subjective method of doing theology.
  54. Activity: Group discussion Ask people to think of what it looks like when theology is done in the proper order.
  55. Presentation Notes: This is the correct method.
  56. Presentation Notes: All in all, this provides a good illustration of what theology is in relation to the Scripture. This does not illustrate everything that theology is since it must also include other sources. This will be covered in more detail later in the course.
  57. Presentation Notes: This summarizes the section “Categories of Theology.” This is a good way for someone to construct their theology. Scripture produces a biblical theology that references and is accountable to historical theology, which in turn is filtered through our reason, and finally a systematic theology is produced. From here, we construct an apologetic theology that reaches out and a creedal theology that defines who we are.
  58. Presentation Notes: Relativism and Subjectivism are frequently used interchangeably, but this distinction is helpful, as some people would hold primarily to one or the other. Examples of Pragmatism would be people’s pragmatic views of divorce (if it makes me happier, ultimately it is right), understanding of ministry success (if there are a lot of people, God is behind it), and the American Revolution (since it was so successful, it was right).
  59. Activity: Group discussion Let people give their opinions concerning this before moving to the next slide. Give them a few minutes to discuss this. Presentation Notes: As will become clear through the rest of this presentation, the first four best represent our postmodern or emerging culture.
  60. Activity: Group discussion Discuss this question only for a moment. Let people give their opinions, but do not settle the question since it will be discussed for the next two classes.
  61. Illustration:
  62. Reference: Michael Patton
  63. Presentation Notes: This conversation is meant to demonstrate that the belief that all truth is relative is not necessarily new. What is new, however, is that it has become such an accepted global phenomenon. Until today, those who believed that all truth was relative were fringe groups that were more or less frowned upon by the majority of population and educated philosophers. Today, no matter where you go—philosophy, religion, politics, or the general public—you are frowned upon if you do not hold to a relativistic epistemology.
  64. Presentation Notes: It is important that you view the video on postmodern epistemology to understand how to present this survey. In the video, the stage of truth is illustrated historically to help the students understand why we are in a postmodern world of relativism. To help build the stage of truth, use people to represent each source of revelation. Reason: A person who majored in math or an engineer. Tradition: The person who comes from the largest immediate family Bible: The person who has the most assigned Bible verses memorized. After the presentation, you should challenge people with the question, “What should the Christian stage of truth look like?” Building this stage of truth is the ultimate purpose of Introduction to Theology.
  65. Presentation Notes: This slide explains that we, according to most scholars, are in the middle to late stages of the transition period into what has been called the postmodern period. This slide usually ends the third session.
  66. Reference: The illustration of Spock and Data is adapted from Stanley Grenz Primer on Postmodernism (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1996), 1-10.
  67. Illustration: This is a good illustration to open the class. Why did the chicken cross the road? THE BIBLE: And God came down from the heavens, and He said unto the chicken, “Thou shalt cross the road.” And the chicken crossed the road, and there was much rejoicing.COLONEL SANDERS:I missed one?L.A. POLICE DEPARTMENT:Give us five minutes with that chicken and we’ll find out.RICHARD M. NIXON:The chicken did not cross the road. I repeat, the chicken did not cross the road. I don't know any chickens. I have never known any chickens. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.:I envision a world where all chickens will be free to cross roads without having their motives called into question. GEORGE W. BUSH Because he made a promise to cross the road, and a promise made is a promise kept. AL GORE I do not identify with that chicken—nor any other chicken. I am my own man.GRANDPA:In my day, we didn’t ask why the chicken crossed the road.Someone told us that the chicken crossed the road, and that was good enough for us.ARISTOTLE:It is the nature of chickens to cross the road.SADDAM HUSSEIN:This was an unprovoked act of rebellion, and we were quite justified in dropping 50 tons of nerve gas on it. BILL CLINTON:I did not cross the road with THAT chicken. What do you mean by chicken?Could you define chicken please? JOHN KERRY: It depends on who’s asking.CAPTAIN JAMES T. KIRK:To boldly go where no chicken has gone before.FREUD:The fact that you are at all concerned that the chicken crossed the road reveals your underlying insecurity.EINSTEIN:Did the chicken really cross the road, or did the road move beneath the chicken? POSTMODERN: It is impossible to know why the chicken crossed the road. The chicken himself does not even know why. If anyone thinks that they know the answer, that is fine, and I am glad that they have found their answer, but they have no right to try to push their beliefs upon me.
  68. Presentation Notes: Notice the rational element to these contradictions. These objections are an appeal to facts and evidence that can be demonstrated. Illustration: Exercise: When you work out, you have to shock your muscles by getting out of a routine in order to promote growth. It is the same thing with our theology. People cannot truly grow if they are stuck in a routine that does not challenge them in a new way.
  69. Presentation Notes: Notice the emotional element to all of these questions. The postmodernist is not so concerned about the facts as they are about fairness.
  70. Presentation Notes: Explain objective truth: Truth that is not bound by any time, culture, or personal opinion. Illustration: “The Inch”: Everyone is aware of the concept of what an inch is. You may have a ruler that measures by inches. But how do you know that the space allotted for the inch on your ruler is really and inch. How do you know that when they made your ruler it was not off just a little? And the ruler from which they made your ruler was not off a slight bit as well? This could go on and on to the point that what we think of as an inch is really far from an inch. How would anyone know? The answer is that “The Inch” is in Washington at the Smithsonian. It is this standard against which all inches are measured. There is an objective ruler from which to measure. There is an objective truth concerning the inch that exists and judges all other inches. This is what postmoderns would deny concerning truth. They would state that all truth is relative and subjective without any objective standard to which they must measure.
  71. Presentation Notes: If the Bible promotes a geocentric solar system, and science evidences a heliocentric universe, one of them is wrong.
  72. Presentation Notes: Example 1: “I might not agree with the homosexual lifestyle, but that does not mean that others have to hold to my opinion.” (subjectivism) Example 2: “You believe in Christianity because you come from a Christian culture. Those from other cultures are not bound to believe what you believe, because they have learned things differently.” (relativism)
  73. Presentation Notes: Do not spend too much time on this slide. It is simply meant to introduce the students to the influence of Postmodern thought in the Church. These issues will be covered in Soteriology. You will have to leave this section with many unanswered questions—this is OK. Syncretism: In the Old Testament Israel is continually falling into syncretism as they intermingled Yahwehism with pagan religions and practices (e.g., sacrificing on the “high places” (1 Kings 3:3). Today, syncretism is expressed in many different ways. Interfaith prayer services, Catholic Buddhists, New Age Christians, Postmodern Christians (or Christians who believe in relativism or universalism) are all examples of syncretism. Inclusivism: This is a more subtle influence of postmodernism on Christianity. The idea is that Christ’s blood is the only way that anyone will make it to heaven, but knowledge of Christ, while better, is not necessary to make it to heaven. God may choose to apply Christ’s blood to those who have never heard of Christ as long as they are doing the best they can following the dictates of their conscience. This is a hard position to argue against, since most Christians are inclusivists when it comes to infants who die or Old Testament Saints, believing that both groups are in heaven even though they never actually heard and believed that Christ died for their sins and rose from the grave. Roman Catholicism, since Vatican II, holds to an inclusivistic view of salvation. Mel Gibson expressed this during an interview concerning “The Passion of the Christ” when he was asked if Christ was the only way. He responded, “No, He is just the easiest way.” Now that you have created the tension, I would leave this question unresolved until it is covered in Soteriology and Sanctification.
  74. Reference: John H. Leith, Creeds of the Churches (Louisville, KY: John Knox Press, 1982), 467. Presentation Notes: This quote, taken from Vatican II, represents the influence of Roman Catholic scholar Karl Rahner (1904-1984), who believed that inward grace is given by God and that a person may find salvation without explicit knowledge of Christ, if they follow and build upon this grace. He called such people “anonymous Christians.”
  75. Presentation Notes: Using “The Inch” illustration again, describe God as “The Inch” to which all truth must ultimately correspond. Be sure to explain that there is no basis for truth without the existence of a transcendent Creator. If the modernists are right and there is no God, then the postmodernists are right that there is no truth. They are both inconsistent with regard to the relationship between their epistemology and theology.
  76. Presentation Notes: Ask people to react to this last statement. Give example of things that God cannot do: Cannot lie (Titus 1:2). Cannot change (1 Sam. 15:29). Cannot act against His own nature. Cannot make a stone so big that He cannot pick it up. The main point that needs to be made is that God cannot deny any attribute of His character. Rationality is an attribute of His character; it is not an exception to this rule.
  77. Presentation Notes: There are not many verses that speak to the reality of truth since it is presupposed in Scripture. This, however, is one that speaks of its universal and eternal applicability and is, therefore, relevant to our study. It is interesting to note that many people quote this verse when they have something in their lives that happens that they cannot explain or when they cannot understand some area of doctrine. While this application is valid, it tends to miss the main point of the verse. The primary thing that this verse is trying to communicate comes after the “but.” While there are many things that we do not understand because they have not been revealed to us, there are many things that have been revealed. That is the thrust of this statement. There are many things that God has revealed to us, and we should rejoice in that. This verse tells us that revealed truths are binding to all people (“us and our sons”), binding in all places (does not give a cultural or geographical restriction), binding for all time (“forever”), and that they have authority over our beliefs and practice (“that we may observe”).
  78. Presentation Notes: “Apophadic” is taken from the Greek apophemee meaning “to deny” (n. apophasis).
  79. Presentation Notes: “Cataphatic” is taken from the Greek kataphainoo meaning “to declare” or “make known” (n. kataphatikos). Christian theology should represent an epistemological balance between both apophatic and cataphatic theology. It is important to stress that the default modus operandi (mode of operation) is to cataphatic theology. When, and only when, our ability to comprehend is shown to be insufficient to understand the issue at hand, we must resort to an admission of mystery (apophatic).
  80. Presentation Notes: Christian theology should represent an epistemological balance between both apophatic and cataphatic theology. Postmodernism has had a positive balancing effect upon evangelical Christianity in that postmoderns see the desperate need to recognize mystery in our theology. Responsible theology will start with cataphatic (“the things revealed”) and move toward mystery (“the secret things”) only when there is no other choice. This admission of mystery will come very often, but it should not define our theology or be the starting place for doing theology.
  81. Presentation Notes: This is a summary chart on Christian Epistemology. The Christian quest for truth should begin with a Soft Skepticism. Soft Skepticism seeks truth understanding that there are many ways for the naive to be misled (more on next slide). Perspectivism understands that we need the input of others in order to better understand the truth, since we often bring our own agenda and misleading experience to the table. Perspectivism values community and counsel. Objectivism understands that there is objective truth to be found (note: the Christian view of truth is not objectivism in the sense that all truth is objective, but that objective truth does exist). Sometimes truth is so clear that it does not need multiple avenues of verification. This is called the perspicuity, or the clarity of truth. For example, one does not need to search for long before he realizes that the Bible teaches us to trust God. There is no need to dispute this—it is clear. There are many issues and doctrine in Scripture and outside of Scripture that are clear and do not need much verification.
  82. Presentation Notes: Webster’s defines naïve as one who is “deficient in worldly wisdom or informed judgment.” The basic idea is that the naive have misinformed judgment that characterizes the way they come to know truth. The naïve Christian is a Christian who does theology in the Folk Theology arena. Soft skepticism calls for an end to the simpleton’s epistemology and demands that the “gates of the mind” (as discussed in the lessons on Folk Theology) be closed until there is good reason to open them.
  83. Presentation Notes: The students should have read and be prepared to discuss the paper “Representing Christ to a Postmodern World” by C. Michael Patton.
  84. Presentation Notes: The following slides on the “Quadrant of Objectivity” can be misleading when viewed. Therefore, it is vitally important that you watch the DVDs for an explanation of the slides.
  85. Presentation Notes: Explain the difference between true relativity and true objectivity. True Relativity: Everything that exists on the left side of the quadrant is truly relative. It is either completely independent of right or wrong, or the right or wrong is determined by the situation. True Objectivity: All that is on the right side of the quadrant is the objective side. Everything on this side has a definite right or wrong. There is always an objective truth that is true no matter whether one believes it. It is not dependent upon time, culture, or any situation. It exists as true or false in and of itself. All biblical principles and doctrines belong on this side.
  86. Presentation Notes: Explain situational relativity. Situational Relativity: The right and the wrong of those in this category are dependent upon the culture, time, situation, or some other variable. Women not wearing a head covering (1 Cor. 11:5) is a good example. While the women who did not wear a head covering were expressing an underlying sinful principle, the wearing of the head covering itself was not right or wrong. Its sinfulness was dependent upon the cultural expression. The same sin may be expressed in our culture but in a different way.
  87. Presentation Notes: Explain autonomous relativity. Autonomous Relativity: This category contains those things that are truly relative. There is no right or wrong. This category is filled primarily with opinions and autonomous customs that are not related to right or wrong. One’s opinion on the best song is an example of something that is autonomously relative. There is no one correct answer that exists by itself — it is always relative.
  88. Presentation Notes: Explain non-essential objectivity. Non-Essential Objectivity: This category contains both doctrinal and non-doctrinal issues that are not necessary for one’s salvation. A good example might be the age of the earth. The earth has a definite and objective age. The truth here is surely objective. But at the same time, it is non-essential, because it is not necessary to believe one way or the other as a prerequisite to salvation.
  89. Presentation Notes: Explain essential objectivity. Essential Objectivity: In our current chart, this category contains only those truths that are essential for salvation. This should contain only those truths which you believe a person must accept in order to be considered a true Christian.
  90. Presentation Notes: There are not many who would disagree that belief in the existence of God is essential to salvation.
  91. Presentation Notes: In Romans 10:9, Paul says that confession of Christ as “Lord” (which in the context means “Yahweh”) is essential to salvation. The question then becomes one of comprehension. Some simply believe that Christ is the only begotten “Son of God,” implying that He is more than man, but they do not understand all of the implications of what it means to be God’s unique Son. Christian orthodoxy confesses, in a Trinitarian formula, that Christ is everything that God is, while at the same time being a separate person from the Father and the Holy Spirit. I don’t think that it is necessary to have an orthodox understanding of everything that a confession of “Christ is Lord” means. But one must believe that He is more than a man and that He is to be worshipped. Therefore, in this sense it is necessary for one to believe that Christ is Lord.
  92. Presentation Notes: This one is a little different than the others because it represents an objective reality that secures salvation, but not necessarily one that is always comprehended and believed. In Romans 3:28, Paul says, “For we consider that a person is declared righteous by faith apart from the works of the law.” A person is saved by faith alone, but he or she may have insufficient understanding of this. An example of this is a believer who has understood and accepted that salvation is by faith alone. This believer commits a sin that casts doubt on his salvation. The subjective feeling that the person has at that time causes him to doubt his salvation, thinking, “If I did something like this, maybe I am not saved.” We have all doubted our salvation at times, and the doubt is usually related to something we have done (sin of commission) or failed to do (sin of omission). While our belief in salvation by faith alone is, at this point, in jeopardy, the reality that salvation is by faith alone is not. Therefore, there are many who have been saved by faith alone in the past, and they are still saved, but they are trusting in their works to keep them saved. In other words, they have been saved by faith alone, but they don’t know it.
  93. Presentation Notes: Paul, writing to the Corinthians, makes it clear that a person must believe in Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection: “Now I want to make clear for you, brothers and sisters, the gospel that I preached to you, that you received and on which you stand, and by which you are being saved, if you hold firmly to the message I preached to you—unless you believed in vain. For I passed on to you as of first importance what I also received—that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures, and that he was buried, and that he was raised on the third day according to the scriptures” (1 Corinthians 15:1-4).
  94. Presentation Notes: This is related to the last, but it focuses on the significance of Christ’s death. The key here is that people must believe that Christ died “for” them. In order to believe this, there must be a realization of sin in the life of the believer, otherwise there is no reason to trust in His death. An understanding of exactly how His death saves someone is not essential for salvation. In other words, one does not have to comprehend and believe in the vicarious substitutionary theory of the atonement (as important as it is) to be saved. One may simply trust that whatever He did on the cross, and however He did it, Christ’s work on the cross was sufficient to take away one’s sins.
  95. Activity: Group discussion Have your class discuss where they would place these on their quadrant.
  96. Presentation Notes: The important thing to note here is that mathematical certainty and empirical certainty can never prove something beyond any doubt whatsoever. This, however, is misleading unless we understand that most all of the decisions that we make are based upon “improvable” ascertains. For example, I cannot prove mathematically or empirically that the outside world exists—it could all be an illusion. Neither can I prove mathematically or empirically that I have existed more than 5 minutes—I could have just come into existence with prerecorded memories that have been placed in my mind. Because I cannot prove these things mathematically or empirically, does not mean that my belief in these things in unwarranted and that it is irrational for me to act as if they were true. In fact, it would be absurd for me to believe otherwise. As well, I cannot prove beyond any doubt whatsoever that I do not have an evil twin brother who loves popcorn living on Mars. I just happen to believe that this is true. We rely upon empirical evidence in our legal system not by demanding that something is proven beyond a possible doubt, but beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, both mathematical and empirical proofs are real proofs provided that we do demand of them what they cannot do. Logical certainty, on the other hand, is provable beyond any doubt whatsoever. It requires deduction and elimination of all possibilities until you arrive at the final option. This final option is true by logical proof. Take for example the famous syllogism: If all men are mortal And if Socrates is a man Therefore, Socrates would be mortal. Provided that the first two premise are correct, the conclusion is correct beyond any doubt whatsoever. Moral certainty has to do with what is demanded by the cumulative case argument. In a courtroom, the murder weapon found on the accused may not be enough to convict. But this along with his finger prints on the weapon, a motive for the crime, and witnesses who saw him commit the crime would be enough and would require a moral conclusion that the accused is indeed guilty.
  97. Presentation Notes: This chart is meant to help people think through the certainty of their beliefs. The main goal here is to help people understand that there are certain truths that the Bible presents clearly, while others are not so clear. Therefore, there will be beliefs that we hold to with absolute certainty (+10), and there will be those that we believe with less certainty (+2, etc.). For example, Scripture clearly teaches that Christ rose from the grave, and this doctrine should be among the beliefs that we hold with absolute certainty (+10). But doctrines such as the pretribulationalist view of the Rapture are not taught as clearly (if at all, according to some) and, therefore, we should consider them with less certainty.
  98. Activity: Group discussion If you have time, have the class break up into groups of two and discuss and fill out this chart in their class notes. If there is not time, answer these questions through a class discussion. If this cannot be done during class because of time constraints (which will probably be the case), have the people do it during discussion time.
  99. Reference: Often falsely attributed to Augustine, this dictum comes from an unpublished tract called Paraenesis votiva pro Pace Ecclesiae ad Theologos Augustanae Confessionis, Auctore Ruperto Meldenio Theologo, c. 1627, 62.
  100. Presentation Notes: Be very clear about what the Gospel is according to a Protestant. Martin Luther stated that the doctrine of justification by faith alone is the confession upon which the Church stands or falls. Protestants believe that the timeline of Christianity is defined by the Gospel. To the extent that people believe the true and unadulterated Gospel, they belong to the Church. Protestants have traditionally believed that there was mass corruption in the Gospel with the introduction of the sacramental system. This sacramental system moved the Catholic Church, as an institution, toward a works-based salvation. Therefore, the church, as an institution, lost the true Gospel and was no longer the true Church.
  101. Presentation Notes: This is a presentation for Roman Catholicism. Until the time of the Protestant Reformation, the entire Church was defined as “catholic”–which simply means “universal.” The term “Roman Catholicism” has been in general use since the Reformation to identify the faith and practice of “Christians in communion with the pope.” The key distinction is the defining marker of the timeline. In the Roman Catholic tradition, the Church must define the Gospel, rather than the Gospel defining the Church. The primary argument for this view would be that it is impossible to have the Gospel without the Church, since the Gospel comes from the Church. No one could know what the Gospel is unless the Church defined the cannon of Scripture which contains the Gospel. No one could know what true doctrine is unless the Church defined orthodoxy. In short, if there is no Church, there is no Gospel. Roman Catholics would interpret Peter’s confession in Matt. 16:13-19 as being justification for this model. Peter, according to the Roman Catholic interpretation, is given authority over the Church, which has the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven. In essence, the Church, as it has descended from Peter, is given control over the Gospel. The Church is the guardian of the Gospel and the graces of God given through the sacraments. Therefore, as the saying became, extra ecclesia nula salutus, “Outside the Church there is no salvation.”
  102. Presentation Notes: While Protestants have traditionally seen Eastern Orthodoxy (sometimes called Greek Orthodox or simply Orthodox) as simply Roman Catholicism without a Pope, Eastern Orthodox would see the division as one between Eastern thinking (Eastern Orthodox) and Western thinking (Roman Catholics and Protestants). Essentially, they would see Roman Catholicism and Protestantism as two sides of the same coin. References: www.probe.org/docs/east-orth.html (article from a protestant perspective) www.orthodoxonline.com/resources/index.htm www.fatheralexander.org/booklets/english/catechism_ext.htm www.saintignatiuschurch.org/timeline.html (great timeline from an Orthodox perspective)
  103. Presentation Notes: The next few slides are not meant to exhaust the reasons for all the various denominations, but they are to show how most divisions find their roots in their theological persuasion. To be sure, many divisions are more practical than theological. But the major “meta” divisions within Protestantism find their genesis in theology.
  104. Presentation Notes: These are representative sub-traditions that are transdenominational.
  105. Presentation Notes: This is simply meant to be a brief overview of the Protestant movement. The two main divisions are that of the Reformed tradition (top line) and the Arminian tradition (bottom line). The way that we are distinguishing them here is with regards to their anthropology. Martin Luther began the Protestant Reformed tradition in the sixteenth century. In Luther’s thesis The Bondage of the Will, he revived the Augustinian view that man’s will is not free in the traditional sense, but man is bound to the desire of his fallen, evil nature. A fallen nature can only desire evil. Therefore, man cannot and would not ever choose God in his fallen state. This is primarily evidenced in Paul’s arguments in Romans 3:10-18. Generally speaking, all those who adhere to this view of the will of man follow the Reformed tradition. The Arminian tradition, on the other hand, generally speaking, follows that man’s will has been effected by the fall, but not to the extent that a person could not choose God. The Arminian argument would be that it is absurd for God to command people to do something that they are not able to do on their own, namely accept Christ. Generally speaking, all who adhere to this view of the will of man follow the Arminian tradition. Illustration: The rise and fall of fundamentalism can be likened to the rise and fall of the Pharisees. The Pharisees came from a pious group of Jews during the post-exilic/intertestamental period called the hasidim (“godly people”). Known as the “out-of-date spoil sports,” they sought to preserve the Jewish religion from corruption in hope of avoiding another exile due to compromise. What started as a good thing was itself corrupted and confused as many of the Pharisees built a wall of rules around their religion to such an extent that the religion itself could no longer be seen. The wall of rules became a religion of legalism with no true spirit. The fundamentalists have a strikingly similar history. They wanted to protect the essential truths of Scripture, but in doing so they separated themselves from the rest of the world by building a similar wall of rules. Anything that had the smell of the world was associated with the corruption of liberalism and humanism. If the world went to the theater, then Christians should not. If the world celebrated Halloween, then the Church was to have no part in it. If the world smoked cigarettes, then it was incumbent upon believers to avoid smoking. On and on the rules went until people could no longer see the light of that which they were trying to protect. Fundamentalism became legalism.
  106. Explanation of Slide: Starting from left to right: (1) culture, (2) mom or child represent tradition, (3) universe represents general revelation, (4) prayer represents experience, (5) the Bible is Special Revelation, (6) the sad man also represents experience, and (7) the preacher is another reference to tradition. The argument is going to head in this direction: While all of these sources are valid sources for our theology, the only truly reliable source, against which all of the others should be tested, is the Scripture.
  107. Presentation Notes: Before we propose a stage of truth of our own, we will now go through the various traditions of Christian theology and variant traditions within Protestant theology and see what the typical stage of truth looks like for each tradition.
  108. Presentation Notes: This is not an objective analysis of Roman Catholic epistemology, since some may build the stage with some differences. It is simply meant to represent the Church’s epistemological confession in general. It is also important to note that this is the typical confessional stage of truth, but not necessarily the pragmatic stage of truth. To put it another way, this is the professed stage of truth, but it does not mean that it is the practiced stage of truth.
  109. Presentation Notes: Like that of Roman Catholicism, this is not an objective analysis of Eastern Orthodox epistemology, since some may build the Eastern Orthodox Church’s stage with some differences. It is simply meant to represent the Church’s epistemological confession in general. Notice that experience is moved to the front, and reason is no longer on the stage since, to the Orthodox Christian, God cannot be known by reason. This stage represents a fundamental difference between Eastern Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism and should be emphasized once again.
  110. Presentation Notes: In general, this is how the Magisterial Reformers would have built the stage of truth. If you are referring to the chart “Traditions in Protestant Theology,” this would represent both the Reformed tradition and the Arminian tradition in their pure form. This is what the Reformers meant when they proclaimed sola scriptura. They did not mean that Scripture is the only source of truth, but that Scripture is the primary and only infallible source of truth to which all other sources must submit. Notice that the only source not represented is emotion (although some may have included it in experience).
  111. Presentation Notes: Again, this is not an objective analysis of Liberal epistemology, since some may build the stage with some differences. It is simply meant to represent the way liberal churches come to know truth in general. Notice that the only two that are not represented in liberal epistemology are Tradition and Scripture. Modernism, with its reliance on rationalism, plays the major role in the development of liberal epistemology.
  112. Presentation Notes: This is not an objective analysis of Charismatic epistemology, since some may build the stage with some differences. It is simply meant to represent the Charismatic Church’s epistemological confession in general. Notice that what was called “Scripture” in the previous tradition is called “Special Revelation” to the Charismatic, since Scripture, for the Charismatic, would not represent all the Special Revelation that is available to people today. This is because charismatics believe that God is still speaking today through various means (e.g.,, prophecy, tongues, word of wisdom/knowledge, dreams, etc.).
  113. Presentation Notes: Again, this is not an objective analysis of Fundamentalist epistemology, since some may build the stage with some differences. Fundamentalistic churches have the tendency to discredit all avenues of knowledge except Scripture. In reaction to the abuses of Roman Catholicism, they discredit tradition. In reaction to the abuses of liberalism, they discredit reason. In reaction to the abuses of Charismatics, they discredit emotion and experience. But, like the others, their practice usually differs from their profession.
  114. Presentation Notes: This stage refers us back to where we left off in session four. It would be possible to place experience on this stage for postmoderns, but we leave it off because this stage represents the way we attempt to come to know objective truth and, for the postmodern, there is no objective truth.
  115. Presentation Notes: Examples: History of Christian thought, Church, parents, books, etc. Benefits: Keeps us from thinking that theology is something that can be done outside of the community, understands that the Spirit works through other people Deficiencies: Tradition is very fallible in that it often contradicts itself. It is always relative and subjective.
  116. Presentation Notes: Examples: Law of non-contradiction, arguments for the existence of God, etc. Benefits: Available to all people, common ground, apologetic benefits for classical apologetics Deficiencies: Noeic effects of sin on the mind, is limited, is subjective (although not like that of experience)
  117. Presentation Notes: The reason for the inclusion of this and the following slide is to inform people of the constant debate that is evidenced throughout Church history concerning the use (or overuse) of reason in theology.
  118. Presentation Notes: This statement does not necessarily represent the consistent theology of Tertullian, but is probably an overstatement in his polemic against the rationalism of the Greek philosophers. It comes from Tertullian’s De Carne Christi 5.
  119. Presentation Notes: Examples: Life’s circumstances, answered prayer, sin Benefits: Immediate experience can bring about great encouragement Deficiencies: Very subjective, can often be misinterpreted
  120. Presentation Notes: Examples: Inner peace after prayer, a deep feeling of regret or guilt, etc. Benefits: Emotional experience can bring about great encouragement. Emotion can be conformational. It is personal. Deficiencies: Very subjective; can often lead one away from God’s will; cannot be relied upon, because people can produce emotional experience on their own
  121. Presentation Notes: This statement does not necessarily represent the consistent theology of Tertullian, but it is probably an overstatement in his polemic against the rationalism of the Greek philosophers. It comes from Tertullian’s De Carne Christi 5.
  122. Presentation Notes: Examples: The universe (which evidences immensity), the human eye (which evidences complexity), the human conscience (which evidences morality), the Rocky Mountains (which evidences beauty), OU football (which evidences power—scratch that) Benefits: The universal availability of general revelation, the vividness of the illustration, its use in apologetics Deficiencies: Does not always represent God accurately, because creation has been marred with the fall; does not provide the way of salvation Note: Many would include emotions, conscience, and reason in the category of general revelation, but we are using it here to refer only to the empirical effects of creation.
  123. Presentation Notes: Examples: God speaking to Adam in the Garden, the parting of the Red Sea, the incarnation of Christ, Scripture, modern day prophets (for Charismatics), Church (for Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox), etc. Benefits: The benefits of Special Revelation are great and many. The primary benefit has to do with the directness of the communication of God. Since Special Revelation does not contain any intermediary corruption, its message is always true. A second benefit has to do with the specific nature of Special Revelation. It contains specific information about God, man, and the way of our relationship to God. Special Revelation is the only revelation that is sufficient to give a knowledge of the Gospel, since the Gospel is not evidence through any other source. The only reliable source of Special Revelation that we have available today is the Bible, unless God is still giving Special Revelation through prophets or direct encounter. We will cover this issue in the next class.
  124. Presentation Notes: Also referred to as the norma absoluta (absolute norm) and norma normata (norming norm).
  125. Activity: Class discussion Ask people to find the stage of truth that this most resembles. They should answer the “Protestant Reformation” stage. Then ask them to state the difference. Presentation Notes: Notice that the only difference between this stage and the Protestant Reformation stage is that emotions have a definite place. This stage would agree with the Protestant confession of sola scriptura in that the Scripture alone has ultimate authority in matters of faith and practice and that Scripture alone is the objective and infallible source of revelation.
  126. Presentation Notes: Now all the sources are included in our theological process.
  127. Presentation Notes: This slide demonstrates how all sources must submit to the Scriptures, since Scripture is the only objective guild that has been unaffected by sin. (Although, it must be admitted again that our interpretation is affected by sin). Illustration: Refer back to “The Inch” held at the Smithsonian Institute. All other “inches” must correspond to the true inch.
  128. Presentation Notes: This is an incredibly important question that could ultimately alter our stage of truth. At the very least, if God still speaks today, it would change “Scripture” to “Special Revelation”, resembling the Charismatic view. If God still speaks today through prophets, dreams, tongues, etc., this definitely will alter not only how we come to know truth, but how we seek for it.
  129. Presentation Notes: This chart is meant to help understand the difference in the different type of gifts. The revelatory sign gifts are those which were meant for the establishment of the Church based on the message of the Gospel and the writing of the New Testament. The confirmatory gifts are those which were given to confirm the word of the Apostles and prophets. For the hard cessationist, both the revelatory and confirmatory sign gifts ceased with the death of the last apostle and the completion of the New Testament since there was no longer need of either. Many of the gifts—such as tongues, interpretation of tongues, discerning of spirits, word of wisdom, word of knowledge—are difficult to place on this chart because of the wide disagreement among cessationists and continuationists as to their meaning and purpose. We have placed them here because it is generally agreed that they are supernatural and are not related at all with talent or personality as are the permanent gifts in most cases. Therefore, the question “Does God still speak today?” is tied to the discussion about the gifts of the Spirit. This will be covered more in Ecclesiology and Eschatology.
  130. Presentation Notes: This argument rightly places the burden of proof on the Cessationist. This does not mean that Cessationism cannot be substantiated, but rather that the burden is on those who would say that the supernatural sign gifts are no longer given and that God does not still speak to people directly or through prophets.
  131. Presentation Notes: This is a very strong argument for Continuationism. If one were to look at all of Scripture from Adam until the Apostle John, one would probably conclude that part of God’s modus operandi is to speak to people directly through direct encounter, dreams, visions, or through a divinely appointed prophet.
  132. Presentation Notes: If people were built upon a foundation that included the Christ (the work of Christ while on the earth), the apostles (the proclamation of this work), and the prophets (the forth-telling of this work), then the foundation is complete. The apostles and prophets were necessary for the establishment of the Church, just as Jesus Christ was necessary. Once the foundation was laid, the apostles and prophets were no longer needed as they were before.
  133. Presentation Notes: This passages seems to suggest that apostles carried unique self-authenticating signs that demonstrated that they were apostles. If these signs were normative then or now, then Paul’s argument here would be meaningless. The continuationist would respond by saying that the authentication is not in the signs themselves, but the way the signs were conducted “with great perseverance.”
  134. Presentation Notes: The writer of Hebrews seems to suggest that he himself did not have the ability to perform signs and wonders (supernatural sign gifts), but only witness these things as they authenticated the message of the apostles. This, like 2 Cor. 12:12, tells us that the apostles had special gifts that were given only for the establishment of the Church. Once the Church was established, there was no longer any need for them. Among these gifts would be prophecy.
  135. Presentation Notes: The idea here would be that the “perfect” is the complete canon of Scripture. Most informed cessationists would not use this verse, but at first glance it seems that it might support a cessationist argument. In reality, this is not the best Scripture for the cessationist to use, since the context makes it clear that the “perfect” is not the Bible, but the coming of Christ (see v. 12). In fact, this might then be used as an argument for Continuationism, since it may imply that tongues will not cease until Christ comes. Some cessationists would point to the fact that the verb for the ceasing of tongues is in the middle voice, implying that they would “cease of themselves” when their purpose was fulfilled. This is probably trying to do too much with the middle voice in this case.
  136. Presentation Notes: This is not necessarily the best argument, since those who argue this would not be inclined to say that every prophecy of the Old or New Testament had to be placed in the Canon of Scripture. The continuationist response that prophecies do not open up the Canon of Scripture seems valid.
  137. Presentation Notes: This argument is taken from both Warfield and MacArthur. It is responded to by Jack Deere in Surprised by the Power to the Spirit (Grand Rapids, IL: Zondervan, 1993), 253-266.
  138. Presentation Notes: In 150 A.D., the Montanist movement claimed that the sign gifts were, in effect, much like the modern-day Charismatics (except they were unorthodox in their essential doctrine). The movement was condemned by various councils under the contention that the supernatural gifts had ceased. It is difficult for the continuationists to answer the question that this raises. If the supernatural sign gifts were meant to be normative for the Church, the Church has essentially been without this important element for 1900 years.
  139. Presentation Notes: Others have called this view the “Open-But-Cautious” view.
  140. Presentation Notes: This is not to suggest that the framers of the Westminster Confession were Soft Cessationists.
  141. Presentation Notes: This does not mean that those who adhere to soft cessationism believe that there will definitely be other revelation before the coming of the events of Revelation, but that the Church must be open to the possibility.
  142. Presentation Notes: The spirit of the third commandment (Ex. 20:7) has to do with saying God said something He did not say. The ancient audience would have been very familiar with the prophets of other gods using the name of their god to accomplish their goal. They may have used the name of Baal to pronounce a curse or a blessing on someone. By using the name of their god, they believed that the curse or blessing had more validity to it. God tells the Israelites not to use His name in such a way. In essence, God was telling the Israelites, “Do not say I said something when I did not to accomplish your own purpose.” This would be using His name in vain. Illustration: Man who says that he has a word from God and then loses it.
  143. Presentation Notes: The purpose of the lesson is to sum up and prepare the students to do theology in a new world, taking advantage of the postmodern context that our culture provides. It is to prepare them for future courses in The Theology Program. Students need to be aware of the pitfalls to which this emerging context can lead. By the end of this lesson, the students should be more aware of how we are united in the Great Tradition of Christianity. This lesson is a plea for unity. But at the same time, it does not purport to define everything that is necessary for orthodoxy. This task will be left to discussion that follow through the forthcoming courses in The Theology Program.
  144. Presentation Notes: The idea here that should be introduced is that we live in a globalized society. In other words, people today are more aware of other cultures and nations than they have ever been. People can no longer be naive concerning those who do not think and believe that way they do. Theology must be done in a world where people are both confused and enlightened by this emerging pluralistic context. They are confused because they often fail to see what units people. They are enlightened because of the many different perspectives people have and bring to the table when searching for truth.
  145. Presentation Notes: This does not mean that theology changes drastically as it is reforming, but that it is being enhanced and better understood as we reform it in the context of the entire body of Christ, both living and dead. For example, Christian theology will not ever reform the doctrine of the resurrection, if that change involves a denial of its historicity, but it may change/reform in its understanding of its significance as related to doctrines that are directly affected by it (e.g.,, the importance of the physical body, the understanding of what resurrected bodies will be like, the importance of Christ’s body as victor over the powers of sin, etc.). Students need to be aware of this principle so that they can move ahead, understanding that the Church is always to reform itself.
  146. Presentation Notes: The Apostles’ Creed (while not really from the Apostles themselves) was an attempt early in Church history to express what doctrines unit Christianity. While not very particular concerning the Great Tradition, it does show how the early Church united around many essentials. This slide is not meant to affirm that the Apostles’ Creed is sufficient to unite Christianity (seeing as how many cults could agree with this statement), but, again, it does evidence the early Church’s desire to show unity. Draw the students attention to the fact that Christians have always been concerned with discovering what units us in the Great Tradition.
  147. Presentation Notes: Here it is important to draw people’s attention to the unity and diversity of people throughout Church history. There are many doctrines that unify Christianity. These are often grouped together and called “The Great Tradition.” While there is much diversity concerning particulars of doctrine and practice, Christianity is also very unified on many things. Draw people’s attention to these things. Trinity: This doctrine was articulated in the fourth-century at the counsel of Nicea. Orthodox Christianity has been united concerning this doctrine, confessing that there is one God who eternally exists in three persons, all of which are fully God, all of which are equal. Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, and Protestantism are united in this confession. Only those on the fringe of Christianity have attempted to deny this doctrine. These groups have been labeled as heretical and cultic because of their denial of this essential doctrine. Doctrine of Christ (Hypostatic Union): This doctrine was articulated during the fourth and fifth-centuries with the climax coming with the statement of Chalcedon in 451. Christ, as it was articulated, is fully God and fully man. Again, all major Christian traditions are united concerning this confession. Doctrine of Man and Grace: This doctrine concerns the sinfulness of man and the necessity of God’s grace to save us. It was championed by Augustine in his debates with Pelagius. Like the others, it was not invented at this time, but was better understood and articulated at this time. Not all Christian traditions would agree about the particulars concerning this doctrine, but all would agree that all humanity has been infected with sin and in need of God’s grace and all would agree that we can only be saved by His grace. Doctrine of the Atonement: This doctrine made the most headway in the eleventh century, but Christianity has always been united that man is sinful and in need of a savior. Christ death on the Cross purchased salvation for mankind. While the particulars of how the benefits of the Cross is applied and how it is effective, all traditions agree that Christ died for man because he is sinful can not save himself.
  148. Presentation Notes: This slide should focus on the unity concerning Protestantism. Protestantism is Catholic Christianity since catholic is a theological term that simply means “universal.” Protestants see themselves as part of the universal or invisible body of Christ (explained more in Ecclesiology and Eschatology). Protestants did not name themselves according to their “protest.” It is an unfortunate label that was given to them by the Roman Catholic Church at Trent in the sixteenth century. It implies a concession to which Protestants would not agree. Protestants would not see themselves as a separatist groups that broke away from the Catholic Church, but as a continuation of the true Church that washed its hands of the corruption that had become a big part of the Medieval Church. Protestants have historically been united, not only in the Great Tradition spoken of above, but in the understanding that salvation is by faith alone. The five “solas” that follow unite Protestants in confession, even though the unfortunate truth is that many Protestants Churches today would not identify with their own tradition.
  149. Presentation Notes: This will be covered more in Soteriology.
  150. Presentation Notes: Man and women were created with different gifts, genetics, and responsibilities. When these diversities are celebrated, then the image of God shines brightly. The are both unified and diverse. It should be apparent by now that God loves diversity. Men and women are to celebrate this diversity, rather than attempt to blur it. When men are functioning as men, and women are functioning as women, then God’s image is represented the way that it was intended to be. This will be covered more in Humanity and Sin.
  151. Presentation Notes: Like God created men and women with diverse gifts and perspectives, so also he created the nations with diversity. People from different cultures and upbringings add great and necessary value to our search for truth. Even when people are not believers in Christ, they are still created in the image of God, and therefore have value. Because of this, their perspectives should be respected and considered, even if their minds are unredeemed. It is vitally important at this point to draw attention to the importance of exposure to beliefs, cultures, and areas of the world where the people think differently. People who do theology only in their own context will be short-sighted and unable to take advantage of the contributions, values, and perspectives of others. Many people do theology in their “ivory towers,” never exposing themselves to real people who have real experiences. We need to be involved not only in the lives of believers of our own culture and tradition, but to those of other nations, traditions, and cultures. We need to have regular exposure to “real life.” This also means that we need to expand our conversations to unbelievers. We need to go on missions trips to other countries, not only to bring them to Christ, but to help understand the way other people think. But we also must not get caught up in the fallacy that says if you do not agree with the way others think (e.g. the western mindset understanding the eastern mindset), it means that you do not understand them, and are, therefore, disqualified to engage in meaningful contribution or evangelization of others.
  152. Presentation Notes: Here, it must be emphasized that people in general are unified by the fact that they are all created in the image of God. This will be covered more in Humanity and Sin but it is important to refer to it here. People are very similar to each other since they are similar to God. While people may set up their stage of truth differently, we all have a stage of truth. Although they may be arranged differently, all people utilize the same sources for their stage. All people have tradition, experience, emotion, reason, and general revelation on the stage. The majority of all people living today and throughout history have had some proclaimed form of special revelation on their stage. Why are we so similar? Because we are all in God’s image. While we are all created in the image of God, we are also quite diverse. We come from diverse families, countries, and cultures. We have different experiences and traditions. We have unique genetics and different personalities. We are diverse by nature and by nurture. We all have our perspectives that we take with us to the drawing board. All of these perspectives need to be valued because of their diversity. But at the same time, we must recognize that, according to the Bible, not all perspectives are equal. We are all tainted by sin (Rom. 2:23), and we follow the evil inclinations of our own heart (Jer. 16:12). God must change the way we think before we can be confident in our methodology (1 Cor. 2:15). Does this mean that our perspective is right and everyone else has nothing to contribute to our theology? No, but it does help us to recognize that not all theologies are equal. It keeps us from sinking in to the quagmire of mindless pluralism.
  153. Presentation Notes: This passage teaches about the four different ways that people receive truth (the word of God). It is important to emphasize that this parable was an exhortation given to the disciples. This parable is not simply about the way unbelievers receive truth, but the way that all people, believers and unbelievers, receive truth. We can all have prepared or unprepared hearts. We can all let the worries of this world make God’s word unproductive. We can all become excited about God’s plan and then fall away. The point is that we must all be prepared to receive God’s truth each day or theology will be completely unproductive. If we are not prepared, we will be constantly riddled with confusion, discouragement, and doubt. The point? According to Scripture, we cannot do theology without God’s Spirit preparing our hearts to receive His word. One fearful thing about this parable that is often missed is the exhortation in verse 18. Christ says that the one comes with a prepared heart and applies what he has learned, more will be given to him. If, on the other hand, someone does not apply what he or she has learned, even what they already knew and understood will be taken away from them. Illustration: When I was growing up, I had a friend who had a mom who was a strong believer in Christ and a great inspiration in my life. She was always giving us biblical instruction and helping us grow strong in the Lord with kindness and truth. She had a great understanding of Scripture and was very wise. But things changed. She had a husband who was not following the Lord. He was a gluttonous alcoholic, addicted to the lures of the nightlife. My friend’s mom struggled with this for years, fighting against him and trying to live a functional life with the Lord. This did not last. She finally made the decision to give up and follow her husband in his lifestyle. Many years have since passed. Now when I see her, she bears no resemblance to her former self. When we talk about the Lord, she speaks as a disillusioned person who has all but let go. She lives in a world of skepticism and doubt. Because she chose to follow her husband rather than the Lord, because she chose not to believe and apply God’s word, even what she had, her wisdom, strength, and insight, were “taken away” from her.