![[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recomendados
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Mais procurados
Mais procurados (20)
Destaque
Destaque (18)
Semelhante a Incorporating Complexity and Change into Governance
Semelhante a Incorporating Complexity and Change into Governance (20)
Último
Último (20)
Incorporating Complexity and Change into Governance
- 1. Incorporating Complexity & Change into Governance Pedro Fidelman Incorporating Complexity & Change into Governance Pedro Fidelman
- 6. The Great Barrier Reef
- 9. Pearl Shell (mother-of-pearl) Fishery Pearl shell fishery, Northern Queensland.
- 10. Pearl Shell Fishery Pearl Shell Buttons
- 21. ! WARNING THERE IS NO END GAME !
Notas do Editor
- Complexity can lead to fragmention… and require coordination/collaboration. ANIMATION
- Complexity can lead to fragmentation… and require coordination/collaboration. Biodiversity: there is no overarching framework to guide and coordinate management actions. Coastal development, lack of integrated planning, resources and enforcement if compromising protection of the GBR. Comprehensive land use planning is not sufficiently focused on water quality protection.
- Complexity can lead to fragmention… and require coordination/collaboration. ANIMATION
- Complexity can lead to fragmentation… and require coordination/collaboration. Biodiversity: there is no overarching framework to guide and coordinate management actions. Coastal development, lack of integrated planning, resources and enforcement if compromising protection of the GBR. Comprehensive land use planning is not sufficiently focused on water quality protection.
- >>Nested institutions: Institutions should be complex, redundant and nested in many layers… as many of the complex contemporary problems are apparent in multiple levels simultaneously (provide physical, technical and institutional infrastructure – encourage adaptation and change).
- >> Interplay : Most institutions interact with other similar arrangements both horizontally and vertically. Horizontal interactions occur at the same level of social organisation. Vertical interplay occurs across the different levels of social organisation. Interaction between and among organisation may take two forms: Functional interdependence occurs when two or more institutions address problems that are linked in biogeophysical or socio-economic terms. Politics of design when players forge links between issues and institutions intentionally to achieve individual or collective goals (joint funding mechanisms). Use examples GBRMPA, QDPI&F, Community etc. GBRMPA + Defence (Islands)+ Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Reef Plan) – GBRMPA + DPI&F (Field Management) + QPWS (DERM).
- Complexity can lead to fragmentation… and require coordination/collaboration. Biodiversity: there is no overarching framework to guide and coordinate management actions. Coastal development, lack of integrated planning, resources and enforcement if compromising protection of the GBR. Comprehensive land use planning is not sufficiently focused on water quality protection.
- >>There is no optimum governance design : we should expect that governance systems will be operating at less optimum levels given the difficulty to fine-tuning complex multi-layered systems. Plus, the SES are dynamics.
- This also happened to other resources such as turtles, dugongs, bêche-de-mer etc. i.e., some contemporary problem have roots in the previous (resource exploration and exploitation) period. What are the lessons from the Pearl Shell case? Barriers to change/adaptation, e.g., resistance of powerful players, incentives from external market, preferences, values, beliefs of pearl shellers…