Policy entrepreneurs and development entrepreneurs: a discussion with The Asia Foundation in Manila
•
0 gostou•1,229 visualizações
Had a very interesting meeting and discussion with about 20 staff of the Asia Foundation in Manila. We talked about policy entrepreneurship and development entrepreneurship and discussed the differences and similarities between the two concepts. The slides refer to the policy entrepreneur concept developed by ODI's RAPID programme
Recomendados
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Semelhante a Policy entrepreneurs and development entrepreneurs: a discussion with The Asia Foundation in Manila
Semelhante a Policy entrepreneurs and development entrepreneurs: a discussion with The Asia Foundation in Manila (20)
Último
Último (20)
Policy entrepreneurs and development entrepreneurs: a discussion with The Asia Foundation in Manila
- 1. Policy entrepreneurship: some ideas for discussion about development entrepreneurship Arnaldo Pellini: a.pellini.ra@odi.org.uk The Asia Foundation Manila 24. July 2012
- 2. ODI • 200 staff • Research / Advice / Public Debate • Fellowship scheme For more information see: www.odi.org.uk
- 3. ODI
- 4. RAPID Policy and Knowledge development processes
- 5. RAPID Power, Politics and evidence use Knowledge intermediaries and interactions Evidence production and communication
- 6. Policy processes are... Cabinet Donors Policy Formula/on Agenda Parliament Se3ng Decision Making Civil Society Monitoring and Ministries Evalua/on Policy Implementa/on Private Sector
- 8. 1. Learn about the context Power, Politics and evidence use Knowledge intermediaries and interactions Evidence production and communication
- 9. 1. Learn about the context Knowledge, Politics and Power (KPP) 1. Mapping the political context 2. Role of key actors 3. Types of knowledge 4. Knowledge intermediation processes
- 10. 1. Learn about the context 1. Mapping the political context • Formal policy processes • Formal/informal political participation processes • Who has the strongest voices in policy debates? • How does the political context condition the search for knowledge?
- 11. 1. Learn about the context 2. Role of key actors • Who is involved in policy making and knowledge processes? • How do these actors interact and what role does knowledge play in this process? • How do interests, values, beliefs shape the knowledge-policy interface?
- 12. 1. Learn about the context 3. Types of knowledge • What sources of knowledge do different actors rely on and why? • From where do they source this knowledge? • How do power relations between actors serve for privileging some sources of knowledge versus others?
- 13. 1. Learn about the context 4. Knowledge intermediation processes • Are there intermediaries involved in the knowledge to policy link? • What innovative ways of working could be used to mediate the knowledge-policy interface?
- 14. 2. Define the policy change Attitudinal change Procedural change Policy content Behaviour change
- 15. 3. Stakeholders’ mapping High 1. List influence Power / stakeholders 2. Map them on a matrix 3. Identify which are the most influential Low Low Interest in High the topic
- 16. 4. Research plan and communication Quantitative / qualitative / mix Research Data collection and analysis tools Get to know your audience Research report + Policy brief Communication Research brief strategy Articles in newspapers Interviews in TV Workshops and presentations ….
- 17. 5. Management approach Overall strategy and plan POLICY Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage … OUTCOME Outputs Outputs Outputs
- 18. 5. Management approach Life of the project Define Conduct research activities Idea research Plan Close Communicate
- 19. 6. Assess your competencies
- 20. 7. Monitoring and learning framework 1. Strategy and direction –are you doing the right thing? 2. Management –are you doing what you planned to do? 3. Outputs – are the outputs appropriate for the audience? 4. Uptake – are people aware of your work? 5. Outcomes and impacts –are you having any impact?
- 21. 7. Monitoring and learning framework Strategy and Logframes, Theory of Change, Peer direction Review, Strategy Document, … Project Documentation, Project Management Governance, Research processes Management, PRINCE2, … Peer reviews, After Action Outputs Reviews, Output logs, … Citation Analysis, Uptake logs, Uptake User Surveys, … Outcomes and Stories of Change, Episode Studies, impacts …
- 22. Conclusions To improve research impact you need: • Clear intent • A systematic approach • The right systems and management approach • To spend more on communications • To engage, engage, engage • Have a long term view
- 23. www.outcomemapping.ca Thank you www.ebpdn.org