Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Semelhante a Janet Raat 15
Semelhante a Janet Raat 15 (20)
Último
Último (20)
Janet Raat 15
- 1. Compare yourself to the top A.N. Raat (Janet) FOCUS your FUTURE May 16-17, 2013
- 2. PhD-student Career read write publish WORK
- 3. PhD-student Career WORK in a social context
- 5. Social Comparison Process of thinking about information of the position and abilities of one or more others in relation to those of oneself. Wood, 1996
- 6. Social Comparison Process of thinking about information of the position and abilities of one or more others in relation to those of oneself. Wood, 1996
- 7. A. N. Ra at, FO CU S yo ur FU TU RE Social Comparison goals motivation pleasure Process of thinking about information of the position and abilities of one or more others in relation to those of oneself. selection Most informative: similar attributed other
- 8. Preferred comparison other during clinical rotations
- 9. Preferred comparison other during clinical rotations peer students 1 2 3 4 5 residents 1 2 3 4 5 staff 1 2 3 4 5 never always N 437 t-test p.001 Raat et al, 2010 (3.64) (3.40) (2.84) p.001
- 10. Intermezzo Process of thinking about information of the position and abilities of one or more others in relation to those of oneself.
- 11. ambitious empathic insecure Social Comparison Orientation Buunk et al, 2007
- 12. Influence of SC
- 13. Influence of SC female female female worse similar better male worse similar better male male worse similar better worse similar better participants participants worse similar better comparison peer (n=214) (n=107) Raat et al, 2012 -0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2
- 14. Influence of SC female female female worse similar better male worse similar better male male worse similar better worse similar better participants participants worse similar better comparison peer (n=214) (n=107) Raat et al, 2012 -0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2
- 15. Influence of SC female female female worse similar better male worse similar better male male worse similar better worse similar better participants participants worse similar better comparison peer (n=214) (n=107) Raat et al, 2012 -0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2
- 16. Influence of SC and gender
- 17. Influence of SC and same sex female female worse similar better male male worse similar better participants participants -0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 worse similar better comparison peer (n=214) (n=107)
- 18. Influence of SC and opposite sex female female male worse similar better male worse similar better participants participants worse similar better comparison peer (n=214) (n=107)-0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2
- 19. SCO upward positive Process of comparison: model Buunk et al, 1997 identification endow sense of opportunities provide information how to improve anticipate on problems / threats
- 20. SCO upward positive negative Process of comparison: model contrast identification discourage no benefit
- 21. SCO downward positive Process of comparison: model contrast inspiring self-confidence integrity respect support
- 22. SCO downward positive negative Process of comparison: model contrast identification discourage lower your standard
- 23. SCO upward downward positive negative Process of comparison: model Buunk et al, 1997 contrast identification identification
- 24. SCO upward downward positive negative Process of comparison: model contrast identification identification
- 25. SCO upward downward positive negative Process of comparison: model contrast identification identification
- 27. A. N. Ra at, FO CU S yo ur FU TU RE Social Comparison goals motivation pleasure Process of thinking about information of the position and abilities of one or more others in relation to those of oneself. selection