Engineers have a responsibility to discuss earthquake risk with clients to better inform them. While building codes aim to protect life safety, they allow significant damage that leaves communities unprepared. Engineers should do more to explain risks like larger-than-code earthquakes and promote resilience. Discussing risk with clients, schools, and colleagues can help create a safer world by raising awareness of natural hazards and how to mitigate risks.

1. 1
Drhammida

2. 2
‫المهندسون‬ ‫لماذا‬‫و‬‫ا‬‫ل‬‫ك‬‫و‬‫د‬‫ا‬‫ت‬‫ا‬‫ل‬‫ه‬‫ن‬‫د‬‫س‬‫ي‬‫ة‬‫ليقاوم‬ ‫البناء‬ ‫اليصممون‬‫ك‬‫ا‬‫م‬‫ل‬‫ق‬‫و‬‫ة‬‫الزالزل‬‫؟‬‫؟‬
-‫ما‬‫الزالزل‬ ‫في‬ ‫يتصدع‬ ‫او‬ ‫ليتشقق‬ ‫البناء‬ ‫تصميم‬ ‫معني‬‫واالقتصاد‬ ‫التوفير‬ ‫بقصد‬‫؟‬‫؟‬
-‫البناء‬ ‫في‬ ‫اللدنة‬ ‫المفاصل‬ ‫تشكل‬ ‫نظرية‬ ‫وتطبيق‬‫وتشتيت‬‫الزالزل‬ ‫طاقة‬‫والذي‬
‫بتشقق‬ ‫يسمح‬‫ج‬‫م‬‫ل‬‫ة‬‫للزالزل‬ ‫المقاوم‬ ‫البناء‬ ‫هيكل‬‫؟؟‬
- Why Engineers and codes construction are determined
to resist the full force of earthquakes ??
- What is the meaning buildings are designed to crack or collapse in
earthquakes with a view to saving the economy ?? Theory and application
form plastic hinge in the construction
and distracting energy earthquakes, which allows cracks occurs
in structure resistant sentences of the earthquake?

3. 3
-‫والحياة‬ ‫الصحة‬ ‫عنوان‬ ‫تحت‬ ‫مقالة‬ ‫في‬ ‫جاء‬
‫مباشرة‬ ‫غير‬ ‫تلميحات‬
‫ا‬‫الهندسية‬ ‫والكودات‬ ‫لمهندسون‬
‫الزلزالي‬ ‫والكوارث‬ ‫المخاطر‬ ‫اهوال‬ ‫سبب‬ ‫هم‬‫ة‬
Came in an article under the title of health and life Hints indirectly Engineers
is the cause of the horrors of seismic risk andand engineering codesIt
disaster
-‫كيف‬‫وتتصدع‬ ‫تتشقق‬ ‫ان‬ ‫يجب‬ ‫ابنية‬ ‫يصممون‬‫الزالزل‬ ‫لتقاوم‬ ‫ساكينها‬ ‫رؤوس‬ ‫فوق‬ ‫تنهار‬ ‫وقد‬
‫امنية‬ ‫ال‬ ‫اقتصادية‬ ‫الال‬ ‫والفرضيات‬ ‫الطرق‬ ‫بهذه‬
-‫تجديدة‬ ‫او‬ ‫ترميمه‬ ‫ونعيد‬ ‫يتشقق‬ ‫ان‬ ‫للبناء‬ ‫نسمح‬ ‫كيف‬‫الزلزال‬ ‫حدوث‬ ‫بعد‬ ‫ثانية‬ ‫مرة‬
-‫الزلزال‬ ‫امام‬ ‫ويصمد‬ ‫ليقاوم‬ ‫البناء‬ ‫يصمم‬ ‫ان‬ ‫المفروض‬‫د‬‫اوتصدع‬ ‫تشقق‬ ‫اي‬ ‫حدوث‬ ‫ون‬
‫واحد‬ ‫بوقت‬ ‫يحافظ‬ ‫الذي‬ ‫هو‬ ‫والصحيح‬ ‫االقتصادي‬ ‫التصميم‬‫ومسكنهم‬ ‫الساكنين‬ ‫حياة‬ ‫على‬
‫الذى‬ ‫فقط‬ ‫المبنى‬ ‫من‬ ‫اخالءهم‬ ‫وامكانية‬ ‫حياتهم‬ ‫على‬ ‫نحافظ‬ ‫ان‬ ‫ال‬‫الخدمة‬ ‫خارج‬ ‫او‬ ‫للسقوط‬ ‫آيل‬ ‫اما‬ ‫اصبح‬
‫للترميم‬ ‫الماليين‬ ‫ويحتاج‬،‫والتجديد‬
-‫اعا‬ ‫من‬ ‫للمهنسين‬ ‫األفضل‬ ‫اليس‬‫والفرضيات‬ ‫المفاهيم‬ ‫هذه‬ ‫على‬ ‫النظر‬ ‫دة‬
‫والشاغلين‬ ‫البناء‬ ‫وتعريض‬ ‫الكوارث‬ ‫سبب‬ ‫هي‬ ‫التي‬ ‫الزلزالية‬
‫االزالزل‬ ‫مخاطر‬ ‫الى‬
-‫المتوقع‬ ‫الزلزال‬ ‫قوة‬ ‫ضعف‬ ‫على‬ ‫ولو‬ ‫حتى‬ ‫البناء‬ ‫تصميم‬ ‫من‬ ‫يمنع‬ ‫مالذي‬‫العامة‬ ‫السالمة‬ ‫ضمانة‬ ‫سبيل‬ ‫في‬
‫والساكنين‬ ‫للبناء‬
-segnihgnitsalp‫م‬‫ف‬‫ا‬‫ص‬‫ل‬‫ل‬‫د‬‫ن‬‫ي‬‫ة‬
‫ت‬‫ش‬‫ك‬‫ل‬‫ا‬‫ل‬‫م‬‫ف‬‫ا‬‫ص‬‫ل‬‫ا‬‫ل‬‫ل‬‫د‬‫ن‬‫ة‬‫ه‬‫و‬‫س‬‫ب‬‫ب‬‫ا‬‫ل‬‫ت‬‫ش‬‫ق‬‫ق‬‫ا‬‫ت‬

4. 4
+
Engineers must take time to discuss earthquake risk and other natural
so clients are better informed and the world a safer–ds with clientshazar
place.
As engineers we have a responsibility to use our knowledge to help reduce
earthquake risk, both human and economic. But do we do enough?
Sure, we do to some extent. As part of the Aceh post-tsunami reconstruction one of
the critical issues was explaining to the NGOs and local population what the risk
was and how this could be avoided in the future. And the REDi Rating System gives
owners, architects and engineers a framework for earthquake resilience.
Yet I think we simply don’t talk enough about risk.
How many engineers tell their clients that a code-based design could leave their
investment damaged beyond repair? Current building codes do not focus
onearthquake resilience – the ability of an organization or community to
quickly recover after a future large earthquake. The code’s objective is only to
protect the lives of building occupants.
This means significant damage to the building structure, architectural components,
facades and other elements is allowed as long as the code objective is met. It is
therefore not surprising that when a major earthquake strikes an urban region the
losses are large and the general public is left to wonder why. The Christchurch
earthquake in February 2011 is a prime example of this.
How many of us point out that there is a chance that the earthquake ground motion
could be much bigger than prescribed in the code? The code ground motion is

5. 5
based on a chance of occurring, such as say getting four numbers in the Lottery.
However, there is always the chance you may get five or, if you are very lucky, six
numbers. There is also a degree of uncertainty in what is still a very young and
developing science.
These are difficult conversations to have, but they’re essential if we are to open
people's eyes to the risk.
Why don’t we all ask to talk to our children's schools to explain what they can
do to mitigate earthquake risk? By doing this people will become more aware
of the natural environment and how they can protect themselves. For example
it is statistically safer to stay in a building and cover yourself rather than
running out and being hit by flying masonry.
And how many engineers have attended conferences, such as the
recent 2ECEES in Istanbul and learnt new things but then not communicated
these to their colleagues back home?
I spoke at 2ECEES and also learnt new things, such as the extensive
experimental testing work carried out under the SERIES project and will try
my best to help disseminate this knowledge.
If I had one piece of advice for my fellow engineers it would be this: Please
consider these questions and take some time to discuss earthquake risk and
other natural hazards, so your clients are better informed. Hopefully, it’ll make
our world a safer place.
Tags: people, health, risk, economics, natural disasters, earthquake, seismic
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

6. 6
‫تنفيذ‬ ‫او‬ ‫تصميم‬ ‫كمهندس‬ ‫برأيك‬ ‫شارك‬
/ Do we talk enough about
enough about earthquake risk?
-espond and comment:R--‫والتعليق‬ ‫الرد‬:
ar. youssef hammidD
12 March 2015 12:41am
Report?
To who should speak first About
?the risks of earthquakes
- All engineering codes and responsible parties about the construction of
buildings and acclaim Require that construction be robust and resistant to
earthquakes and natural disasters.
In addition to the engineer and the designer and government agencies
Responsible for achieving security and public safety of the citizens as well
To achieve economic factor but not at the expense of the lives of citizens
- To design buildings to withstand earthquakes and natural disasters
Determined by engineering codes and regulations urban and not the
customer or the owner The building, which does not care, but profiteering
and fast if it returned to him dollars and the possibility of not design for
earthquake resistance
- Structural engineer designer does not discuss the seismic risk with the
customer never It is designed in accordance with the applicable code
engineering and system engineering profession In the country where
construction is hailed.
- Discussion of the dangers of earthquakes in schools and forums will not
delay or offers something Reduce the size of the disaster
- Not fear but the fear of the earthquake and post-earthquake tragedy
Hunker down under the table or the bed or in the closet, is not the answer
Could collapse ceilings and columns, and the situation is worse

7. 7
- As well stay at home and do not leave may be the most dangerous of
Departure May fall interior walls and partitions blocks above the heads of
occupants.
- And the most dangerous of all seismic repercussions may follow another
streak Much larger than the first tremor lead to the collapse of the building
above the occupants
- And this is illogical and untrue to ask citizens
How to behave during disasters and earthquakes are not sure and confident
What is the best and most appropriate to stay at home or to escape to the
street during the earthquake But this does not prevent the awareness of
citizens and a statement that both roads and risksAnd return him to take
the appropriate decision.
- But the important thing is to control the state and the government to work
on the engineering and design of earthquakes and the health of the study
and implementation Civil Defense is the first and last official
About the lives of the citizens and help them during disasters Computer
Hotline Yes, we should first discuss the seriousness of the disaster from
earthquakes and other With officials from the government and to be fully
prepared and equipment
And provide help and shelters for those affected by the disaster.
- For what came in the codes and references of engineering studies and
programs Buildings resistant to earthquakes are correct and economic way
Will not go into now explained
- But humane and economical at the same time because they are interested
in human life first And the citizen can restoration and construction of new
construction, but can not be compensated
The lives of the citizens of New
- Design ordinance says we design the building almost half the magnitude
of the quake On the basis of the joints should form sulfides in sentence
construction seismic We must crack construction remains steadfast, and
the possibility of exit dwell And restoration can be built and returned to
service
- In this way we maintain the public safety of the citizens
At the same time we have provided millions of dollars on economic owner
and State If the earthquake happened can renovate that building millions If
the earthquake did not happen and has provided millions of home

8. 8
can finally say:
- Engineering and construction is in first-class safety and keeping the
public safety of the citizens- not economy and provide millions
- But we support the opinion of the writer must build a solid and be
steadfast before the occurrence of earthquakes We must reconsider the
ordinance economic design and form plastic joints
- Because no design engineer nor humanly not legally accept the design
house building handicapped irresistible earthquakes
Fully and is subject to cracking and cracking and displacement dwelling
under the pretext of saving the economy
- So it does nothing to prevent reconsider these assumptions form the
joints and other sulfides Even though the design has been forced to double
the expected magnitude of the quake and add some shear walls
Or decrease the number of floors or the value of the purchase of housing in
exchange for preserving the safety of citizens and the safety of their homes
Can not accept, apartment or condo building in advance know that it will
collapse or crack Upon the occurrence of the earthquake and its owners
become homeless.
Greetings
D.r youssef hammida

9. 9
‫والزالزل؟؟‬ ،‫الكوارث‬ ‫مخاطر‬ ‫عن‬ ‫اوال‬ ‫نتكلم‬ ‫من‬ ‫الى‬
-‫ومقاوما‬ ‫متينا‬ ‫البناء‬ ‫يكون‬ ‫ان‬ ‫تتطلب‬ ‫المباني‬ ‫اشادة‬ ‫و‬ ‫البناء‬ ‫حول‬ ‫المسؤولة‬ ‫والجهات‬ ‫الهندسية‬ ‫الكودات‬ ‫جميع‬
‫الطبيعية‬ ‫والكوارث‬ ‫للزالزل‬.‫عن‬ ‫المسؤولة‬ ‫الحكومية‬ ‫والجهات‬ ‫المصممة‬ ‫والجهة‬ ‫المهندس‬ ‫ان‬ ‫الى‬ ‫وباالضافة‬
‫ا‬ ‫تحقيق‬ ‫الى‬ ‫باالضافة‬ ‫للمواطنين‬ ‫العامة‬ ‫والسالمة‬ ‫األمان‬ ‫تحقيق‬‫حياة‬ ‫حساب‬ ‫على‬ ‫ليس‬ ‫لكن‬ ‫االقتصادي‬ ‫لعامل‬
‫المواطنين‬
-‫وليس‬ ‫العمرانية‬ ‫واألنظمة‬ ‫الهندسية‬ ‫الكودات‬ ‫تحدده‬ ‫الطبيعية‬ ‫والكوارث‬ ‫الزالزل‬ ‫مقاومة‬ ‫على‬ ‫األبنية‬ ‫تصميم‬ ‫ان‬
‫بتوفيرماليين‬ ‫لطالب‬ ‫اليه‬ ‫األمر‬ ‫عاد‬ ‫ولو‬ ‫والسريع‬ ‫الفاحش‬ ‫الربح‬ ‫اال‬ ‫يهمه‬ ‫ال‬ ‫الذي‬ ، ‫البناية‬ ‫مالك‬ ‫او‬ ‫الزبون‬
‫الدو‬‫الرات‬‫الزالزل‬ ‫لمقاومة‬ ‫التصميم‬ ‫عدم‬ ‫وامكانية‬
-‫به‬ ‫المعمول‬ ‫الهندسي‬ ‫الكود‬ ‫وفق‬ ‫يصمم‬ ‫بل‬ ‫مطلقا‬ ‫الزبون‬ ‫مع‬ ‫الزالزل‬ ‫مخاطر‬ ‫يناقش‬ ‫ال‬ ‫المصمم‬ ‫اإلنشائي‬ ‫المهندس‬
‫البناء‬ ‫يشاد‬ ‫حيث‬ ‫البلد‬ ‫في‬ ‫الهندسة‬ ‫مهنة‬ ‫مزاولة‬ ‫ونظام‬.
-‫يق‬ ‫او‬ ‫يؤخر‬ ‫لن‬ ‫والمنتديات‬ ‫المدارس‬ ‫في‬ ‫الزالزل‬ ‫اخطار‬ ‫مناقشة‬‫الكارثة‬ ‫حجم‬ ‫تقليل‬ ‫من‬ ‫شيئا‬ ‫دم‬-‫من‬ ‫الخوف‬ ‫ليس‬
‫قد‬ ‫الحل‬ ‫هو‬ ‫ليس‬ ،‫الخزانة‬ ‫في‬ ‫او‬ ‫السرير‬ ‫او‬ ‫الطاولة‬ ‫تحت‬ ‫اإلحتماء‬ ‫الزلزال‬ ‫بعد‬ ‫ما‬ ‫والمأساة‬ ‫الخوف‬ ‫لكن‬ ‫الزلزال‬
‫اسوأ‬ ‫الوضع‬ ‫ويكون‬ ‫واألعمدة‬ ‫األسقف‬ ‫تنهار‬
-‫تتسا‬ ‫قد‬ ‫المغادرة‬ ‫من‬ ‫اخطر‬ ‫يكون‬ ‫قد‬ ‫المغادرة‬ ‫وعدم‬ ‫البيت‬ ‫في‬ ‫البقاء‬ ‫كذلك‬‫البلوك‬ ‫وقواطع‬ ‫الداخلية‬ ‫الجدران‬ ‫قط‬
‫الساكنين‬ ‫رؤوس‬ ‫فوق‬.-‫األولى‬ ‫الهزة‬ ‫من‬ ‫بكثير‬ ‫اكبر‬ ‫متتالية‬ ‫اخري‬ ‫زلزالية‬ ‫ارتدادات‬ ‫تتبعها‬ ‫قد‬ ‫كله‬ ‫ذلك‬ ‫من‬ ‫واألخطر‬
‫الشاغلين‬ ‫فوق‬ ‫البناء‬ ‫انهيار‬ ‫الى‬ ‫تؤدي‬-‫يتصرفون‬ ‫كيف‬ ‫المواطنين‬ ‫من‬ ‫نطلب‬ ‫ان‬ ‫صحيح‬ ‫وغير‬ ‫منطقي‬ ‫غير‬ ‫هذا‬ ‫و‬
‫الزالزل‬ ‫كوارث‬ ‫اثناء‬‫اثناء‬ ‫للشارع‬ ‫الهروب‬ ‫او‬ ‫البيت‬ ‫في‬ ‫البقاء‬ ‫واألنسب‬ ‫األفضل‬ ‫هو‬ ‫ما‬ ‫وواثقين‬ ‫متأكدين‬ ‫ولسنا‬
‫المناسب‬ ‫القرار‬ ‫اتخاذ‬ ‫له‬ ‫ويعود‬ ‫ومخاطرها‬ ‫الطرق‬ ‫كال‬ ‫له‬ ‫وبيان‬ ‫المواطن‬ ‫توعية‬ ‫من‬ ‫يمنع‬ ‫ال‬ ‫هذا‬ ‫لكن‬ ‫الزلزال‬.
-‫الزالز‬ ‫على‬ ‫والتصميم‬ ‫الهندسي‬ ‫للعمل‬ ‫الحكومة‬ ‫ومراقبة‬ ‫الدولة‬ ‫هو‬ ‫المهم‬ ‫لكن‬‫والدفاع‬ ‫والتنفيذ‬ ‫الدراسة‬ ‫وصحة‬ ‫ل‬
‫اوال‬ ‫نناقش‬ ‫ان‬ ‫يجب‬ ‫نعم‬ ‫الطبعية‬ ‫الكوارث‬ ‫اثناء‬ ‫ومساعدتهم‬ ‫المواطنين‬ ‫حياة‬ ‫واألخيرعن‬ ‫األول‬ ‫المسؤول‬ ‫هو‬ ‫المدني‬
‫وتقديم‬ ‫والمعدات‬ ‫االستعداد‬ ‫تمام‬ ‫على‬ ‫يكونوا‬ ‫وان‬ ‫الحكومة‬ ‫من‬ ‫المسؤولين‬ ‫مع‬ ‫وغيرها‬ ‫الزالزل‬ ‫من‬ ‫الكوارث‬ ‫خطورة‬
‫والمالجئ‬ ‫االسسعافات‬‫الكوارث‬ ‫من‬ ‫للمتضررين‬.
-‫الطريقة‬ ‫فهي‬ ‫للزالزال‬ ‫األبنية‬ ‫مقاومة‬ ‫وبرامج‬ ‫دراسات‬ ‫من‬ ‫الهندسية‬ ‫والمراجع‬ ‫الكودات‬ ‫في‬ ‫جاء‬ ‫لما‬ ‫بالنسبة‬
‫شرحها‬ ‫في‬ ‫األن‬ ‫نخوض‬ ‫ولن‬ ‫واالقتصادية‬ ‫الصحيحة‬-‫حياة‬ ‫اوال‬ ‫يهمها‬ ‫ألنها‬ ‫الوقت‬ ‫بنفس‬ ‫واقتصادية‬ ‫انسانية‬ ‫لكنها‬
‫االنسان‬
‫ا‬ ‫يمكن‬ ‫اوالحيث‬ ‫والمواطن‬‫جديد‬ ‫من‬ ‫المواطن‬ ‫حياة‬ ‫تعويض‬ ‫يمكن‬ ‫ال‬ ‫لكن‬ ،‫جديد‬ ‫من‬ ‫وبناءه‬ ‫البناء‬ ‫ترميم‬ ‫عادة‬
-‫اللدنة‬ ‫المفاصل‬ ‫تشكل‬ ‫يجب‬ ‫اساس‬ ‫على‬ ‫الزلزال‬ ‫قوة‬ ‫نصف‬ ‫على‬ ‫تقريبا‬ ‫البناء‬ ‫نصمم‬ ‫نحن‬ ‫تقول‬ ‫التصميم‬ ‫فريضة‬
‫الساكنين‬ ‫خروج‬ ‫وامكانية‬ ، ‫صامدا‬ ‫ويبقى‬ ‫البناء‬ ‫يتشقق‬ ‫ان‬ ‫ويجب‬ ‫الزلزالية‬ ‫االنشائية‬ ‫جملته‬ ‫في‬‫البناء‬ ‫ترميم‬ ‫ويمكن‬
‫الخدمة‬ ‫الى‬ ‫واعادته‬
-‫المالك‬ ‫على‬ ‫الدوالرات‬ ‫ماليين‬ ‫اقتصاديا‬ ‫وفرنا‬ ‫الوقت‬ ‫وبنفس‬ ‫للمواطنين‬ ‫العامة‬ ‫السالمة‬ ‫على‬ ‫حافظنا‬ ‫الطريقة‬ ‫بهذه‬
‫والدولة‬
‫للوطن‬ ‫الماليين‬ ‫وفرت‬ ‫الزلزال‬ ‫يحدث‬ ‫لم‬ ‫واذا‬ ‫وفرناها‬ ‫التي‬ ‫بالماليين‬ ‫البناء‬ ‫ترميم‬ ‫يمكن‬ ‫الزلزال‬ ‫حدث‬ ‫فاذا‬

10. 10
‫وا‬‫نقول‬ ‫ان‬ ‫يمكن‬ ‫خيرا‬:
-‫للمواطنين‬ ‫العامة‬ ‫السالمة‬ ‫وحفظ‬ ‫األمان‬ ‫األولى‬ ‫الدرجة‬ ‫في‬ ‫هي‬ ‫والبناء‬ ‫الهندسة‬
- ;`‫األخرين‬ ‫حساب‬ ‫على‬ ‫ليس‬ ‫ولكن‬ ‫الماليين‬ ‫وتوفير‬ ‫االقتصاد‬ ‫كذلك‬
-‫على‬ ‫النظر‬ ‫اعادة‬ ‫ويجب‬ ‫وبعدها‬ ‫الزالزل‬ ‫وقوع‬ ‫قبل‬ ‫وصامد‬ ‫متين‬ ‫البناء‬ ‫يكون‬ ‫ان‬ ‫يجب‬ ‫الكاتب‬ ‫رأي‬ ‫نؤيد‬ ‫نحن‬ ‫لكن‬
‫اللدنة‬ ‫المفاصل‬ ‫وتشكل‬ ‫االقتصادي‬ ‫التصميم‬ ‫فريضة‬
‫الزالزل‬ ‫يقاوم‬ ‫ال‬ ‫معاق‬ ‫بناء‬ ‫بيت‬ ‫بتصميم‬ ‫نقبل‬ ‫شرعا‬ ‫وال‬ ‫انسانيا‬ ‫وال‬ ‫التصميم‬ ‫مهندس‬ ‫ال‬ ‫ألن‬
‫علي‬ ‫فقط‬ ‫والحفاظ‬ ‫واالقتصاد‬ ‫الوفر‬ ‫بحجة‬ ‫الساكنين‬ ‫وتشريد‬ ‫والتصدع‬ ‫للتشقق‬ ‫وقابل‬ ‫كامل‬ ‫بشكل‬
‫ع‬ ‫الحفاظ‬ ‫دون‬ ‫الشاغرين‬ ‫اخالء‬ ‫وامكانية‬ ‫حياة‬‫عمره‬ ‫وشقاء‬ ‫بيته‬ ‫لى‬
-‫الفرضيات‬ ‫من‬ ‫وغيرها‬ ‫اللدنة‬ ‫المفاصل‬ ‫تشكل‬ ‫الفرضيات‬ ‫هذه‬ ‫على‬ ‫النظر‬ ‫باعادة‬ ‫يمنع‬ ‫ما‬ ‫اليوجد‬ ‫لذلك‬
‫وتصدعه‬ ‫بيته‬ ‫وخراب‬ ‫المواطن‬ ‫بنجاة‬ ‫تسمح‬ ‫التي‬ ‫الزلزالية‬ ‫االنشائية‬
‫سليما‬ ‫يبقى‬ ‫بحيث‬ ‫الزالزل‬ ‫لمقاومة‬ ‫البناء‬ ‫تصميم‬ ‫يجب‬ ‫المقال‬ ‫كاتب‬ ‫صوت‬ ‫الى‬ ‫صوتنا‬ ‫نضم‬ ‫نعم‬
‫المتوقع‬ ‫الزلزال‬ ‫قوة‬ ‫ضعف‬ ‫على‬ ‫التصميم‬ ‫وتم‬ ‫اضطر‬ ‫حتى‬ ‫ولو‬ ‫تصدعات‬ ‫او‬ ‫تشققات‬ ‫دون‬ ‫الزلزال‬ ‫بعد‬
‫المسكن‬ ‫شراء‬ ‫قيمة‬ ‫الكلفةو‬ ‫زادت‬ ‫ولو‬ ‫حتى‬ ‫الطوابق‬ ‫عدد‬ ‫انقاص‬ ‫او‬ ‫الجديدة‬ ‫القصية‬ ‫الجدران‬ ‫بعض‬ ‫واضافة‬
‫واألخير‬ ‫األول‬ ‫الملجأ‬ ‫هي‬ ‫والتي‬ ‫بيوتهم‬ ‫وسالمة‬ ‫المواطنين‬ ‫سالمة‬ ‫على‬ ‫الحفاظ‬ ‫مقابل‬‫وأحفادهم‬ ‫لهم‬

11. 11
‫الخالصة‬:
-‫الساكنين‬ ‫رؤوس‬ ‫فوق‬ ‫يتصدع‬ ‫او‬ ‫سيتشقق‬ ‫انه‬ ‫سلفا‬ ‫نعرف‬ ‫بناء‬ ‫او‬ ‫شقة‬ ‫او‬ ‫مسكن‬ ‫قبول‬ ‫يمكن‬ ‫فال‬
‫نازحين‬ ‫او‬ ‫مشردين‬ ‫اصحابه‬ ‫ويصبح‬ ‫الزلزال‬ ‫وقوع‬ ‫عند‬‫واالقتصاد‬ ‫التوفير‬ ‫بحجة‬
-‫الزلزال‬ ‫قوة‬ ‫كامل‬ ‫على‬ ‫البناء‬ ‫نصمم‬ ‫ال‬ ‫لماذا‬‫جديد‬ ‫من‬ ‫وتدعيمه‬ ‫ترميمه‬ ‫ونعيد‬ ‫ويتصدع‬ ‫يتشقق‬ ‫ال‬ ‫حتى‬ ‫واكثر‬
‫للزلزل‬ ‫المقاومة‬ ‫العناصر‬ ‫في‬ ‫اللدنة‬ ‫المفاصل‬ ‫تشكل‬ ‫من‬ ‫موثوقة‬ ‫غير‬ ‫وهمية‬ ‫اشياء‬ ‫على‬ ‫نعتمد‬ ‫لماذا‬
‫ال‬ ‫طاقة‬ ‫وتشتيت‬ ‫اللدنة‬ ‫المنطقة‬ ‫الى‬ ‫مقاومته‬ ‫ووصول‬‫زلزال‬
‫واحد‬ ‫سبب‬ ‫لتواجد‬ ‫يحدث‬ ‫لن‬ ‫اكيد‬ ‫وهذا‬‫الخبرة‬ ‫قلة‬ ‫الى‬ ‫المواد‬ ‫جودة‬ ‫تدني‬ ‫الى‬ ‫التنفيذ‬ ‫سوء‬ ‫من‬
-‫بعينة‬ ‫الجنون‬ ‫انه‬‫واالنتحار‬Conclusion
be accept housing, apartment or building in advance know thatcannotit-.
Upon the occurrence of thecrack or fall apart over the heads of residents
Under theearthquake and occupants become homeless or displaced
pretext of saving and the economy
-Why do not designed to build on the full force of the earthquake and more
so as not to crack and fall apart and re-restored and strengthened again
Why rely on things fake unreliable form of arthritis sulfides in the resistance
elements of the earthquake And the arrival of its resistance to the Teflon
region and distracting power of the earthquake
and that's for sure not going to happen for the presence of a single cause
Poor implementation of the low-quality materials to the lack of experience
ness and suicideIt's a sample of mad-
Greeting-‫تحياتي‬
D.r youssef hammida

12. 12
Dr hammida