The document provides instructions for a family health assessment assignment. Students are asked to identify social determinants of health affecting a family and how they impact the family's health status. Students must recommend age-appropriate health screenings for each family member based on information from a previous assessment. They also need to select a health model to create a family-centered health promotion plan and outline steps for the plan, including communication strategies.

1. Family health Assessment Part 2
Family Assessment Part II View RubricDue Date: Feb 17, 2019 23:59:59 Max Points:
150 Details: Refer back to the interview and evaluation you conducted in the Topic 2
Family Health Assessment assignment. Identify the social determinates of health (SDOH)
contributing to the family’s health status. In a 750-1,000-word paper, create a plan of action
to incorporate health promotion strategies for this family. Include the following:Describe
the SDOH that affect the family health status. What is the impact of these SDOH on the
family? Discuss why these factors are prevalent for this family.Based on the information
gathered through the family health assessment, recommend age-appropriate screenings for
each family member. Provide support and rationale for your suggestions. Choose a health
model to assist in creating a plan of action. Describe the model selected. Discuss the reasons
why this health model is the best choice for this family. Provide rationale for your
reasoning.Using the model, outline the steps for a family-centered health promotion.
Include strategies for communication.Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources
to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and
appropriate for the assignment criteria.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines
found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not
required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the
assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are
required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the
Student Success Center.Family Assessment Part II 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%2 Less than
Satisfactory 75.00%3 Satisfactory 79.00%4 Good 89.00%5 Excellent 100.00%80.0
%Content20.0 %SDOH Affecting Family and Family Health StatusSDOH affecting family
health status, and the direct impact to the family, are not presented.SDOH affecting family
health status are partially presented. SDOH listed are not relevant to the family. The direct
impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are unclear. There are
inaccuracies.Key SDOH affecting family health status are summarized. The SDOH identified
are relevant to the family. The direct impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent
to the family, are generally discussed. More support or rationale is needed in some
areas.The overall SDOH affecting family health status are accurately identified and
described. The SDOH identified are relevant to the family. The direct impact to the family,
and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are discussed. The SDOH directly affecting
family health status are relevant, accurately identified and thoroughly described. The direct
impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are discussed in detail.

2. The discussion is well supported and illustrates insight into SDOH and their effect on family
health status.20.0 %Age-Appropriate Screening RecommendationsAge-appropriate
screenings are not presented.Screenings are presented for some family members. The
screenings are not age appropriate. Screenings are not relevant to the information gathered
through family health assessment. Screenings are presented for each family member.
Screenings are generally age appropriate, but entirely not relevant based on the information
gathered through family health assessment. More rationale and support is
required.Screenings presented for each family member are age appropriate. Screenings are
relevant and based on the information gathered through family health assessment. Some
minor rationale or support is needed.Screenings presented for each family member are age
appropriate and highly relevant. Screenings correlate to the information gathered through
family health assessment. Strong rationale and support is presented.20.0 %Assessment of
Health ModelA health model to assist in the creation of a plan of action is not presented. The
model chosen is not a health model.A health model is selected to assist in creating a plan of
action. The description of the model is incomplete. It is unclear why the chosen model is
best for this family.A health model is selected and described. A summary of how the model
will assist in creating a plan of action is presented. A general overview for why it is best for
this family is provided. More rationale and support is required.A health model is selected
and described. A discussion of how the model will assist in creating a plan of action is
presented. Reasons for why it is best for this family are provided. Some rationale or support
is needed.A health model is selected and thoroughly described. A detailed discussion of how
the model will assist in creating a plan of action is presented. Reasons for why it is best for
this family are clearly outlined. Strong rationale and support are provided to support
reasoning.20.0 %Application of Health ModelFamily-centered health promotion using
selected health model is omitted. Steps for a family-centered health promotion are partially
presented. The health promotion is not based on the health model. Significant aspects are
missing. There are major inaccuracies.The health model is used to create a general family-
centered health promotion. The steps to achieve the desired outcome require more detail to
illustrate a clear plan of action. A general plan for communication with the family is
presented. More rationale and support is required.The health model is used to create a
relevant family-centered health promotion. The steps to achieve the desired outcome are
illustrated. Strategies for communication with the family are presented.The health model is
used to create a relevant and viable family-centered health promotion. The steps to achieve
the desired outcome are described in detail. Appropriate strategies for communication with
the family are clearly presented. The health promotion is well-designed and demonstrates
an ability to assimilate findings and appropriately apply theoretical knowledge to achieve
desired outcomes.15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 %Thesis Development and
PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is
insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to
purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive
and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive
and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 %Argument Logic and

3. ConstructionStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does
not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible
sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There
are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is
orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of
claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are
credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical
progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing
argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All
sources are authoritative.15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive
enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are
present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to
the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is
largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence
structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of
standard, written, academic English.5.0 %Format2.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate
style for the major and assignment)Template is not used appropriately or documentation
format is rarely followed correctly.Template is used, but some elements are missing or
mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.Template is used, and formatting is
correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are
virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct. 3.0 %Documentation
of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment
and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or
incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources
are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors
may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and
format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate
to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 %Total Weightage