course materials

1. Week 4 Discussion: Critic Of The Arts
Week 4 Discussion: Critic Of The ArtsWeek 4 Discussion: Critic Of The ArtsRead/review the
following resources for this activity:Textbook: Chapter 3, 4Minimum of 1 scholarly source
(in addition to the textbook)Initial Post InstructionsSelect a work of art from any of the
chapters in our textbook, and write a response that analyzes the art through the lens of a
descriptive critic, an interpretive critic, and an evaluative critic. What different things would
these critics have to say? Use the following guidelines:Descriptive Critic: Address at least 3
different elements of art and/or principles of design.Interpretive Critic: This will require
research so that you can understand the subject, meaning, and intent of the work.Evaluative
Critic: Use the standards of perfection, insight, and inexhaustibility (as described in the
text).Follow-Up Post InstructionsRespond to at least one peer. Further the dialogue by
providing more information and clarification. Provide feedback on whether you agree or
disagree with their criticism. Explain why. Build on their posts by providing additional
insight of your own. If your peer selected the same artwork as you, make sure to address
new point or develop existing points in more depth.Writing RequirementsMinimum of 2
posts (1 initial & 1 follow-up)Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons
and an outside source)APA format for in-text citations and list of referencesORDER NOW
FOR CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERSYou must proofread your paper. But do not
strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so
indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly.
Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read
over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as
necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious
errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.Use a standard 10
to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers
with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over
the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.Likewise,
large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space
between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at
“padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not
fool your professor.The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch
margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to
use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be
hard to follow your argument