SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 10
Baixar para ler offline
Salmon Site
Mississippi
Long-Term Stewardship Site Highlights
Salmon Site (page 3)
Major Activities- groundwater monitoring; enforcing restrictions for access to and use of the subsurface
Site Size- 595 hectares (1 ,470 acres)
Start/End Years- 2003/in perpetuity
Estimated Average Annual Cost FY2000-2006- $60,000
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Salmon Site ............................................................................ 3
Mississippi I
National Defense Authodzation Act (NOAA) Long-Tenn Stewardship Report
Mississippi 2
Salmon Site
SALMON SITE
1.0 SITE SUMMARY
1.1 Site Description and Mission
The Salmon Site covers approximately 595 hectares
(1,470 acres) and is located 34 kilometers (21 miles)
southwest ofHattiesburg, Mississippi. The U.S. Atomic
Energy Commission (AEC), later known as the
Department of Energy (DOE), used the site for two
nuclear test detonations, Salmon and Sterling, to
evaluate the seismic response of salt deposits to nuclear
explosives. AEC conducted the first test, Salmon, at a
depth of 828 meters (2,717 feet) in the Tatum Salt
Dome in October 1964. AEC detonated the second test,
known as Sterling, in the Salmon cavity in December
1966. The Salmon Site was also the location for two
non-nuclear gas detonations used for seismic
decoupling studies in the Vela Uniform Program. The
LONG-TERM STEWARDSHIP HIGHLIGHTS
Major Long-Term Stewardship Activities -
groundwater monitoring; enforcing restrictions for
access to and use of the subsurface
Total Site Area- 595 hectares (1,470 acres)
Estimated Volume ofResidual Contaminants-
unknown
Long-Term Stewardship Start-End Years- 2003-in
perpetuity
Average Annual Long-Term Stewardship Cost FY
2000-2006- $60,000
Landlord- U.S. Department of Energy
non-nuclear gas detonations, Diode Tube in February 1969 and Humid Water in April1970, consisted of two
methane-oxygen explosions conducted in the Salmon/Sterling cavity. These two detonations did not result in
additional contamination of the site.
The Salmon Site is currently owned by DOE. DOE's mission at the site is to complete surface remediation and
continue long-term stewardship activities of the residual subsurface contamination in the test cavity. DOE
anticipates transferring the site surface to the State of Mississippi after final closure of the subsurface is
completed in 2003. At that time, DOE anticipates that the surface area at the site will be established as a
demonstration forest and wildlife refuge.
1.2 Site Cleanup and Accomplishments
DOE has developed site remediation plans and completed site characterization, modeling, and risk assessments
for both the surface and subsurface areas. In October 1999, DOE initiated final site closure negotiations with the
State of Mississippi. In addition, DOE has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Lamar County that
provides approximately $2 million to extend a drinking water system to residences in the vicinity ofthe site. This
water system is expected to eliminate potential receptors for groundwater contamination. DOE expects to
complete all remediation activities at the site by 2003.
AEC's underground detonations at the site resulted in contamination of subsurface areas and groundwater. The
potential contaminants of concern for the subsurface are mixed fission products, including plutonium, uranium,
and tritium. During cleanup activities conducted at the site in 1972, AEC injected radioactively contaminated
soils and water into the test cavity. The injection wells were then sealed with concrete and bentonite when the
site was decommissioned. DOE does not plan to remediate subsurface contamination because of the lack of
feasible technologies for removing subsurface contamination. However, DOE will use characterization and
modeling data to define the areas that will require institutional controls. Negotiations with the State of
Mississippi on final site closure criteria were initiated in 1999, and DOE expects all subsurface closure work will
be completed by 2003.
Mississippi 3
National Defense Authorization Act (NOAA) Long-Term Stewardship Report
Potential surface contamination at the site resulted from drilling operations after the first test was conducted.
Contaminants ofconcern include tritium and diesel fuel in abandoned mud pits, shallow disposal areas, and bum
pits. In 1972, AEC initiated cleanup of surface contamination by excavating soils, decommissioning facilities,
and disposing of wastes. In 1977, DOE conducted an additional sampling program, with more than 170
exploratory borings, and extensive soil and groundwater sampling. The results of the study showed that tritium
contamination was left in the shallow mud pits during the 1972 site cleanup. As a result of this contamination,
a plume of tritium extends northwest from the surface-ground-zero mud pits. DOE provided the site remedial
investigation report to the State of Mississippi for review and State approval was received in May 2000. The
State will make a decision on DOE's closure plans based on its review ofthe documentation. Assuming that the
State accepts the current DOE plan, the surface contamination will be left in place to naturally decay to levels
that will allow the site to be transferred to the State for use as a demonstration forest and wildlife refuge
(approximately 10 years).
0 10
Miles
Salmon Site
2.0 SITE-WIDE LONG-TERM STEWARDSHIP
2.1 Long-Term Stewardship Activities
DOE expects that the subsurface will be closed and that DOE activities at the site will consist solely oflong-term
stewardship activities beginning in 2003. DOE will not maintain an active presence at this site but will be
responsible for monitoring and maintaining institutional controls over subsurface contamination. Final long-term
stewardship requirements for the subsurface will be negotiated with the State ofMississippi. Periodic monitoring
will be conducted to ensure that there is no contaminant migration from the test cavity to the groundwater. DOE
does not anticipate that any long-term stewardship activities associated with the remediated surface
Mississippi 4
Salmon Site
contamination will be necessary once the existing levels of contamination have either attenuated or decayed to
agreed upon concentration levels, which is estimated to take approximately 10 years.
DOE maintains the project-specific records at the Nevada Operations Office in Las Vegas. These records include
corrective action investigation workplans and reports; corrective action decision documents; health assessments;
risk assessments; information submitted by the public; National Environmental Policy Act documents; and the
Public Involvement Plan. The DOE Public Reading Facility and the Nevada Division of Environmental
Protection Administrative Record are provided with copies of these documents. Upon the completion of the
project, all DOE project files will be transferred to controlled storage at the Nevada Operations Office. Records
are retained according to DOE records retention procedures.
2.2 Specific Long-Term Stewardship Activities
Groundwater
A monument has been placed at the site to mark the location of the test cavity. DOE will maintain institutional
controls over the subsurface in perpetuity to prevent access to the test cavity, groundwater, and associated
subsurface contamination. Institutional controls will include restricting surface intrusions on the site. DOE will
continue to conduct annual groundwater monitoring at the site for at least 100 years after closure of the
subsurface in 2003. DOE estimates that repair or replacement of groundwater monitoring wells will be required
every 25 years. At the end ofthe post-closure groundwater monitoring period in 2103, assuming State regulatory
agency approval, the monitoring wells will be plugged and abandoned in place in accordance with State
regulations.
2.3 Regulatory Regime
In accordance with applicable regulatory drivers listed below, DOE is responsible for identifying the nature and
extent of contamination, determining potential risk to the public and the environment, and performing the
necessary corrective actions in compliance with guidelines and requirements under federal regulatory drivers,
as well as the state-specific regulatory drivers associated with the site location. These responsibilities are
delegated to the DOE Office of Environmental Management.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act CRCRA): RCRA was the first comprehensive Federal effort to deal
with solid and hazardous waste. RCRA regulates the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal
of hazardous waste. At the Salmon Site, RCRA is enforced to protect human health and the environment;
conserve energy and natural resources; reduce the amount of generated waste; and ensure that wastes are
managed in an environmentally sound manner.
Comprehensive Environmental Response. Compensation. and Liability Act CCERCLA): CERCLA supplies a
system for identifying and providing corrective action to sites where hazardous substances have been released
into any part of the air, water, groundwater, or land. Provisions of CERCLA include a National Contingency
Plan, which establishes procedures for corrective action for hazardous substance releases. Salmon is not
regulated under CERCLA; however, the regulations are useful as developmental guidelines.
In addition to federal regulations, DOE must comply with State regulatory requirements. In most cases, State
ofMississippi requirements are based on federal guidelines; however, in specific cases they may be more detailed
and stringent than federal regulations.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC): NRC regulations establish "free release" criteria. The State of
Mississippi is not regulated under the NRC; however, the regulations are used as developmental guidelines.
Mississippi 5
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Long-Tenn Stewardship Report
2.4 Assumptions and Uncertainties
DOE assumes that the State of Mississippi will approve the proposed surface restoration plan. Current land use
designations and subsurface intrusion restrictions will continue into the foreseeable future. DOE will reevaluate
and modify the subsurface restrictions, as appropriate, as part of the assessment and/or corrective action
activities.
DOE does not plan to remove subsurface contamination in and around the test cavities. However, DOE will
develop subsurface models to define the contaminant boundary and refine the existing subsurface intrusion
restrictions, if necessary. Post-closure monitoring will be conducted, as agreed upon in the site closure reports
for the subsurface, in order to detect changes in the subsurface conditions. The schedule for groundwater
monitoring after closure of the subsurface will be defined in the subsurface closure report. DOE assumes that
groundwater monitoring will continue annually after subsurface closure is finalized in 2003 and that monitoring
will be performed for 100 years (2003-2103).
3.0 ESTIMATED LONG-TERM STEWARDSHIP COSTS
The cost profile in the table below applies to the entire Salmon site. The major long-term stewardship costs are
for monitoring activities, data analysis, and repair and replacement of monitoring wells. The spikes in cost are
a result of costs associated with repairing or replacing monitoring wells, which are assumed to require
maintenance every 25 years.
The long-term stewardship costs for the Salmon Site remain roughly constant at $40,000 annually through FY
2010. The higher costs in FY 2000 are associated with the new Real Estate Operations Permit (RE-OP)
requirements. The cost increase in 2008 is the result of a periodic review and analysis of the data to evaluate and
possibly refine the monitoring strategy. This review and analysis will occur every five years throughout the post-
closure monitoring period (2003-2103). DOE projects that the total post-2070 (2071-2103) costs will be
approximately $6.8 million dollars.
Site Long"Term Stewardship Costs (Constant Ye~l- ~OOODollan)
Year(s) Amount Year(s) Amount Year(s) Amount
FY 2000 $180,000 FY 2008 $113,000 FY 2036-2040 $272,000
FY 2001 $40,000 FY 2009 $40,000 FY 2041-2045 $272,000
FY 2002 $40,000 FY 2010 $40,000 FY 2046-2050 $273,000
FY 2003 $40,000 FY 2011-2015 $272,000 FY 2051-2055 $2,772,000
FY 2004 $40,000 FY 2016-2020 $272,000 FY 2056-2060 $272,000
FY 2005 $40,000 FY 2021-2025 $272,000 FY 2061-2065 $272,000
FY 2006 $40,000 FY 2026-2030 $2,772,000 FY 2066-2070 $272,000
FY 2007 $40,000 FY 2031-2035 $272,000 PostFY 2070 $6,800,000
4.0 FUTURE USES
Public Law 104-201 (the National Defense Authorization Act ofFiscal Year 1997, Section 2851(b), September
1996) allows DOE to transfer the site to the State of Mississippi. It is anticipated that the Salmon Site will be
Mississippi 6
Salmon Site
used as a demonstration forest and wildlife refuge. If the State accepts the property, agreements will be enacted
for the transfer. The agreements will be completed prior to the completion of the closure activities and will be
predicated on the final agreed upon surface closure criteria and future land use determinations. The anticipated
end state for the Salmon Site will allow for future surface use at the site with an NRC designation of "no
radiological restrictions." DOE will continue to restrict access to the test cavities, subsurface soil, and
groundwater through the use of deed restrictions in perpetuity.
For additional information about the Salmon Site, please contact:
Monica Sanchez
U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office
Environmental Restoration Division
232 Energy Way
North Las Vegas, NV 89030-4199
Phone: 702-295-0160
sanchezm@nv.doe.gov
Mississippi 7
Mississippi

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Off site koppers soil fact sheet 9-10_2010 - print ready
Off site koppers soil fact sheet 9-10_2010 - print readyOff site koppers soil fact sheet 9-10_2010 - print ready
Off site koppers soil fact sheet 9-10_2010 - print readyProtect Gainesville's Citizens
 
PortsHarborsBeaches_Capabilities_Statement
PortsHarborsBeaches_Capabilities_StatementPortsHarborsBeaches_Capabilities_Statement
PortsHarborsBeaches_Capabilities_StatementDebbie Kilbane Fawcett
 
Wetland Mitigation Recommendaitons
Wetland Mitigation RecommendaitonsWetland Mitigation Recommendaitons
Wetland Mitigation RecommendaitonsAndrea Drabicki
 
Dewey Loeffel Landfill EPA Superfund SIte Factsheet
Dewey Loeffel Landfill EPA Superfund SIte Factsheet  Dewey Loeffel Landfill EPA Superfund SIte Factsheet
Dewey Loeffel Landfill EPA Superfund SIte Factsheet Vaaltje Rough Notes
 
Positive Declaration for Pilgrim Pipeline from NY DEC & Thruway Authority
Positive Declaration for Pilgrim Pipeline from NY DEC & Thruway AuthorityPositive Declaration for Pilgrim Pipeline from NY DEC & Thruway Authority
Positive Declaration for Pilgrim Pipeline from NY DEC & Thruway AuthorityMarcellus Drilling News
 
Municipal Adaptations to Create Resilient Beach Communities
Municipal Adaptations to Create Resilient Beach CommunitiesMunicipal Adaptations to Create Resilient Beach Communities
Municipal Adaptations to Create Resilient Beach CommunitiesSMRPC
 
ACOE Coastal Storm Management Alternative for Jamaica Bay Communities
ACOE Coastal Storm Management Alternative for Jamaica Bay CommunitiesACOE Coastal Storm Management Alternative for Jamaica Bay Communities
ACOE Coastal Storm Management Alternative for Jamaica Bay Communitiesecowatchers
 
Sedimentation assessment of a small reservoir at afaka forest reserve, kaduna...
Sedimentation assessment of a small reservoir at afaka forest reserve, kaduna...Sedimentation assessment of a small reservoir at afaka forest reserve, kaduna...
Sedimentation assessment of a small reservoir at afaka forest reserve, kaduna...Alexander Decker
 
Hydrocarbon Trapping mechanism and petrophysical analysis of Afam field, offs...
Hydrocarbon Trapping mechanism and petrophysical analysis of Afam field, offs...Hydrocarbon Trapping mechanism and petrophysical analysis of Afam field, offs...
Hydrocarbon Trapping mechanism and petrophysical analysis of Afam field, offs...David Oyeyemi
 
Lessons Learned From The Everglades Sjr Summit 2010 09 15 Esterson+Landers
Lessons Learned From The Everglades Sjr Summit 2010 09 15 Esterson+LandersLessons Learned From The Everglades Sjr Summit 2010 09 15 Esterson+Landers
Lessons Learned From The Everglades Sjr Summit 2010 09 15 Esterson+LandersKris Esterson
 

Mais procurados (16)

Off site koppers soil fact sheet 9-10_2010 - print ready
Off site koppers soil fact sheet 9-10_2010 - print readyOff site koppers soil fact sheet 9-10_2010 - print ready
Off site koppers soil fact sheet 9-10_2010 - print ready
 
PortsHarborsBeaches_Capabilities_Statement
PortsHarborsBeaches_Capabilities_StatementPortsHarborsBeaches_Capabilities_Statement
PortsHarborsBeaches_Capabilities_Statement
 
Oregon
OregonOregon
Oregon
 
Wetland Mitigation Recommendaitons
Wetland Mitigation RecommendaitonsWetland Mitigation Recommendaitons
Wetland Mitigation Recommendaitons
 
West virginia
West virginiaWest virginia
West virginia
 
WST-WSTWS-EM11803
WST-WSTWS-EM11803WST-WSTWS-EM11803
WST-WSTWS-EM11803
 
Texas
TexasTexas
Texas
 
Wetlands_term_paper_2015
Wetlands_term_paper_2015Wetlands_term_paper_2015
Wetlands_term_paper_2015
 
Dewey Loeffel Landfill EPA Superfund SIte Factsheet
Dewey Loeffel Landfill EPA Superfund SIte Factsheet  Dewey Loeffel Landfill EPA Superfund SIte Factsheet
Dewey Loeffel Landfill EPA Superfund SIte Factsheet
 
Positive Declaration for Pilgrim Pipeline from NY DEC & Thruway Authority
Positive Declaration for Pilgrim Pipeline from NY DEC & Thruway AuthorityPositive Declaration for Pilgrim Pipeline from NY DEC & Thruway Authority
Positive Declaration for Pilgrim Pipeline from NY DEC & Thruway Authority
 
Aoc sediment update_part2
Aoc sediment update_part2Aoc sediment update_part2
Aoc sediment update_part2
 
Municipal Adaptations to Create Resilient Beach Communities
Municipal Adaptations to Create Resilient Beach CommunitiesMunicipal Adaptations to Create Resilient Beach Communities
Municipal Adaptations to Create Resilient Beach Communities
 
ACOE Coastal Storm Management Alternative for Jamaica Bay Communities
ACOE Coastal Storm Management Alternative for Jamaica Bay CommunitiesACOE Coastal Storm Management Alternative for Jamaica Bay Communities
ACOE Coastal Storm Management Alternative for Jamaica Bay Communities
 
Sedimentation assessment of a small reservoir at afaka forest reserve, kaduna...
Sedimentation assessment of a small reservoir at afaka forest reserve, kaduna...Sedimentation assessment of a small reservoir at afaka forest reserve, kaduna...
Sedimentation assessment of a small reservoir at afaka forest reserve, kaduna...
 
Hydrocarbon Trapping mechanism and petrophysical analysis of Afam field, offs...
Hydrocarbon Trapping mechanism and petrophysical analysis of Afam field, offs...Hydrocarbon Trapping mechanism and petrophysical analysis of Afam field, offs...
Hydrocarbon Trapping mechanism and petrophysical analysis of Afam field, offs...
 
Lessons Learned From The Everglades Sjr Summit 2010 09 15 Esterson+Landers
Lessons Learned From The Everglades Sjr Summit 2010 09 15 Esterson+LandersLessons Learned From The Everglades Sjr Summit 2010 09 15 Esterson+Landers
Lessons Learned From The Everglades Sjr Summit 2010 09 15 Esterson+Landers
 

Destaque

ใบงานที่9 16
ใบงานที่9 16ใบงานที่9 16
ใบงานที่9 16Pim Jazz
 
Personality development notes
Personality development notesPersonality development notes
Personality development notessuminch
 
Aaa1 doe lts report congress vol1
Aaa1 doe lts report congress vol1Aaa1 doe lts report congress vol1
Aaa1 doe lts report congress vol1Jim Werner
 
North Vietnam Remote Villages Trek and Overland Tour Travel Hanoi Lao Cai Bac...
North Vietnam Remote Villages Trek and Overland Tour Travel Hanoi Lao Cai Bac...North Vietnam Remote Villages Trek and Overland Tour Travel Hanoi Lao Cai Bac...
North Vietnam Remote Villages Trek and Overland Tour Travel Hanoi Lao Cai Bac...vktbox
 
Nicolai werner nscc summer 2013
Nicolai werner nscc summer 2013Nicolai werner nscc summer 2013
Nicolai werner nscc summer 2013Jim Werner
 
Vietnam Cambodia family tour Travel Hanoi Sapa Halong Bay Hoian Nha Trang Sai...
Vietnam Cambodia family tour Travel Hanoi Sapa Halong Bay Hoian Nha Trang Sai...Vietnam Cambodia family tour Travel Hanoi Sapa Halong Bay Hoian Nha Trang Sai...
Vietnam Cambodia family tour Travel Hanoi Sapa Halong Bay Hoian Nha Trang Sai...vktbox
 
North Vietnam Remote Villages Trek and Overland Tour Travel Hanoi Lao Cai Bac...
North Vietnam Remote Villages Trek and Overland Tour Travel Hanoi Lao Cai Bac...North Vietnam Remote Villages Trek and Overland Tour Travel Hanoi Lao Cai Bac...
North Vietnam Remote Villages Trek and Overland Tour Travel Hanoi Lao Cai Bac...vktbox
 
South carolina ndaa summary vol 2
South carolina ndaa summary vol 2South carolina ndaa summary vol 2
South carolina ndaa summary vol 2Jim Werner
 
นำเสนอโครงงานคอม
นำเสนอโครงงานคอมนำเสนอโครงงานคอม
นำเสนอโครงงานคอมPim Jazz
 
Vietnam Family Vacation Travel Hanoi Mai Chau Tam Coc Halong Bay Hue Hoian Sa...
Vietnam Family Vacation Travel Hanoi Mai Chau Tam Coc Halong Bay Hue Hoian Sa...Vietnam Family Vacation Travel Hanoi Mai Chau Tam Coc Halong Bay Hue Hoian Sa...
Vietnam Family Vacation Travel Hanoi Mai Chau Tam Coc Halong Bay Hue Hoian Sa...vktbox
 
South carolina ndaa summary vol 2
South carolina ndaa summary vol 2South carolina ndaa summary vol 2
South carolina ndaa summary vol 2Jim Werner
 

Destaque (16)

Oregon
OregonOregon
Oregon
 
ใบงานที่9 16
ใบงานที่9 16ใบงานที่9 16
ใบงานที่9 16
 
Personality development notes
Personality development notesPersonality development notes
Personality development notes
 
Aaa1 doe lts report congress vol1
Aaa1 doe lts report congress vol1Aaa1 doe lts report congress vol1
Aaa1 doe lts report congress vol1
 
North Vietnam Remote Villages Trek and Overland Tour Travel Hanoi Lao Cai Bac...
North Vietnam Remote Villages Trek and Overland Tour Travel Hanoi Lao Cai Bac...North Vietnam Remote Villages Trek and Overland Tour Travel Hanoi Lao Cai Bac...
North Vietnam Remote Villages Trek and Overland Tour Travel Hanoi Lao Cai Bac...
 
We work together
We work togetherWe work together
We work together
 
Nicolai werner nscc summer 2013
Nicolai werner nscc summer 2013Nicolai werner nscc summer 2013
Nicolai werner nscc summer 2013
 
Iowa
IowaIowa
Iowa
 
Vietnam Cambodia family tour Travel Hanoi Sapa Halong Bay Hoian Nha Trang Sai...
Vietnam Cambodia family tour Travel Hanoi Sapa Halong Bay Hoian Nha Trang Sai...Vietnam Cambodia family tour Travel Hanoi Sapa Halong Bay Hoian Nha Trang Sai...
Vietnam Cambodia family tour Travel Hanoi Sapa Halong Bay Hoian Nha Trang Sai...
 
North Vietnam Remote Villages Trek and Overland Tour Travel Hanoi Lao Cai Bac...
North Vietnam Remote Villages Trek and Overland Tour Travel Hanoi Lao Cai Bac...North Vietnam Remote Villages Trek and Overland Tour Travel Hanoi Lao Cai Bac...
North Vietnam Remote Villages Trek and Overland Tour Travel Hanoi Lao Cai Bac...
 
South carolina ndaa summary vol 2
South carolina ndaa summary vol 2South carolina ndaa summary vol 2
South carolina ndaa summary vol 2
 
นำเสนอโครงงานคอม
นำเสนอโครงงานคอมนำเสนอโครงงานคอม
นำเสนอโครงงานคอม
 
Forum marat
Forum maratForum marat
Forum marat
 
Vietnam Family Vacation Travel Hanoi Mai Chau Tam Coc Halong Bay Hue Hoian Sa...
Vietnam Family Vacation Travel Hanoi Mai Chau Tam Coc Halong Bay Hue Hoian Sa...Vietnam Family Vacation Travel Hanoi Mai Chau Tam Coc Halong Bay Hue Hoian Sa...
Vietnam Family Vacation Travel Hanoi Mai Chau Tam Coc Halong Bay Hue Hoian Sa...
 
VLAN & WAP
VLAN & WAPVLAN & WAP
VLAN & WAP
 
South carolina ndaa summary vol 2
South carolina ndaa summary vol 2South carolina ndaa summary vol 2
South carolina ndaa summary vol 2
 

Semelhante a Mississippi

Missouri summary ndaa
Missouri summary ndaaMissouri summary ndaa
Missouri summary ndaaJim Werner
 
Missouri summary ndaa
Missouri summary ndaaMissouri summary ndaa
Missouri summary ndaaJim Werner
 
Missouri summary ndaa
Missouri summary ndaaMissouri summary ndaa
Missouri summary ndaaJim Werner
 
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AROUND DEEP-SEA MINING SITES
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AROUND DEEP-SEA MINING SITESRECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AROUND DEEP-SEA MINING SITES
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AROUND DEEP-SEA MINING SITESiQHub
 
South carolina
South carolinaSouth carolina
South carolinaJim Werner
 
South carolina
South carolinaSouth carolina
South carolinaJim Werner
 
Mms csl nabfinal 2002 ld
Mms csl nabfinal 2002 ldMms csl nabfinal 2002 ld
Mms csl nabfinal 2002 ldcnxsolutions
 

Semelhante a Mississippi (20)

Alaska
AlaskaAlaska
Alaska
 
Nevada
NevadaNevada
Nevada
 
Pennsylvania
PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
Pennsylvania
 
Kentucky
KentuckyKentucky
Kentucky
 
Missouri
MissouriMissouri
Missouri
 
West virginia
West virginiaWest virginia
West virginia
 
Missouri
MissouriMissouri
Missouri
 
Missouri summary ndaa
Missouri summary ndaaMissouri summary ndaa
Missouri summary ndaa
 
Missouri summary ndaa
Missouri summary ndaaMissouri summary ndaa
Missouri summary ndaa
 
Missouri summary ndaa
Missouri summary ndaaMissouri summary ndaa
Missouri summary ndaa
 
Texas
TexasTexas
Texas
 
South dakota
South dakotaSouth dakota
South dakota
 
Idaho
IdahoIdaho
Idaho
 
South dakota
South dakotaSouth dakota
South dakota
 
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AROUND DEEP-SEA MINING SITES
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AROUND DEEP-SEA MINING SITESRECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AROUND DEEP-SEA MINING SITES
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AROUND DEEP-SEA MINING SITES
 
South carolina
South carolinaSouth carolina
South carolina
 
Summary lecture 2
Summary lecture 2Summary lecture 2
Summary lecture 2
 
Idaho
IdahoIdaho
Idaho
 
South carolina
South carolinaSouth carolina
South carolina
 
Mms csl nabfinal 2002 ld
Mms csl nabfinal 2002 ldMms csl nabfinal 2002 ld
Mms csl nabfinal 2002 ld
 

Mais de Jim Werner

Werner Jim Testomony FINAL Nov 2005 Senate EPW Subcommittee on Clean Air
Werner Jim Testomony FINAL Nov 2005 Senate EPW Subcommittee on Clean AirWerner Jim Testomony FINAL Nov 2005 Senate EPW Subcommittee on Clean Air
Werner Jim Testomony FINAL Nov 2005 Senate EPW Subcommittee on Clean AirJim Werner
 
EPW Tmy Werner July 2007 Final
EPW Tmy Werner July 2007 FinalEPW Tmy Werner July 2007 Final
EPW Tmy Werner July 2007 FinalJim Werner
 
ELR Rad Waste Article Werner
ELR Rad Waste Article WernerELR Rad Waste Article Werner
ELR Rad Waste Article WernerJim Werner
 
From Cleanup to Stewardship Oct 1999
From Cleanup to Stewardship Oct 1999From Cleanup to Stewardship Oct 1999
From Cleanup to Stewardship Oct 1999Jim Werner
 
South carolina ndaa summary vol 2
South carolina ndaa summary vol 2South carolina ndaa summary vol 2
South carolina ndaa summary vol 2Jim Werner
 

Mais de Jim Werner (20)

Werner Jim Testomony FINAL Nov 2005 Senate EPW Subcommittee on Clean Air
Werner Jim Testomony FINAL Nov 2005 Senate EPW Subcommittee on Clean AirWerner Jim Testomony FINAL Nov 2005 Senate EPW Subcommittee on Clean Air
Werner Jim Testomony FINAL Nov 2005 Senate EPW Subcommittee on Clean Air
 
EPW Tmy Werner July 2007 Final
EPW Tmy Werner July 2007 FinalEPW Tmy Werner July 2007 Final
EPW Tmy Werner July 2007 Final
 
ELR Rad Waste Article Werner
ELR Rad Waste Article WernerELR Rad Waste Article Werner
ELR Rad Waste Article Werner
 
From Cleanup to Stewardship Oct 1999
From Cleanup to Stewardship Oct 1999From Cleanup to Stewardship Oct 1999
From Cleanup to Stewardship Oct 1999
 
cover
covercover
cover
 
Wyoming
WyomingWyoming
Wyoming
 
Washington
WashingtonWashington
Washington
 
Utah
UtahUtah
Utah
 
Tennessee
TennesseeTennessee
Tennessee
 
South carolina ndaa summary vol 2
South carolina ndaa summary vol 2South carolina ndaa summary vol 2
South carolina ndaa summary vol 2
 
Puerto rico
Puerto ricoPuerto rico
Puerto rico
 
Ohio
OhioOhio
Ohio
 
New jersey
New jerseyNew jersey
New jersey
 
New mexico
New mexicoNew mexico
New mexico
 
Nebraska
NebraskaNebraska
Nebraska
 
Mass
MassMass
Mass
 
Maryland
MarylandMaryland
Maryland
 
Iowa
IowaIowa
Iowa
 
Illinois
IllinoisIllinois
Illinois
 
Florida
FloridaFlorida
Florida
 

Mississippi

  • 1. Salmon Site Mississippi Long-Term Stewardship Site Highlights Salmon Site (page 3) Major Activities- groundwater monitoring; enforcing restrictions for access to and use of the subsurface Site Size- 595 hectares (1 ,470 acres) Start/End Years- 2003/in perpetuity Estimated Average Annual Cost FY2000-2006- $60,000
  • 2.
  • 3. Table of Contents Table of Contents Salmon Site ............................................................................ 3 Mississippi I
  • 4. National Defense Authodzation Act (NOAA) Long-Tenn Stewardship Report Mississippi 2
  • 5. Salmon Site SALMON SITE 1.0 SITE SUMMARY 1.1 Site Description and Mission The Salmon Site covers approximately 595 hectares (1,470 acres) and is located 34 kilometers (21 miles) southwest ofHattiesburg, Mississippi. The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), later known as the Department of Energy (DOE), used the site for two nuclear test detonations, Salmon and Sterling, to evaluate the seismic response of salt deposits to nuclear explosives. AEC conducted the first test, Salmon, at a depth of 828 meters (2,717 feet) in the Tatum Salt Dome in October 1964. AEC detonated the second test, known as Sterling, in the Salmon cavity in December 1966. The Salmon Site was also the location for two non-nuclear gas detonations used for seismic decoupling studies in the Vela Uniform Program. The LONG-TERM STEWARDSHIP HIGHLIGHTS Major Long-Term Stewardship Activities - groundwater monitoring; enforcing restrictions for access to and use of the subsurface Total Site Area- 595 hectares (1,470 acres) Estimated Volume ofResidual Contaminants- unknown Long-Term Stewardship Start-End Years- 2003-in perpetuity Average Annual Long-Term Stewardship Cost FY 2000-2006- $60,000 Landlord- U.S. Department of Energy non-nuclear gas detonations, Diode Tube in February 1969 and Humid Water in April1970, consisted of two methane-oxygen explosions conducted in the Salmon/Sterling cavity. These two detonations did not result in additional contamination of the site. The Salmon Site is currently owned by DOE. DOE's mission at the site is to complete surface remediation and continue long-term stewardship activities of the residual subsurface contamination in the test cavity. DOE anticipates transferring the site surface to the State of Mississippi after final closure of the subsurface is completed in 2003. At that time, DOE anticipates that the surface area at the site will be established as a demonstration forest and wildlife refuge. 1.2 Site Cleanup and Accomplishments DOE has developed site remediation plans and completed site characterization, modeling, and risk assessments for both the surface and subsurface areas. In October 1999, DOE initiated final site closure negotiations with the State of Mississippi. In addition, DOE has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Lamar County that provides approximately $2 million to extend a drinking water system to residences in the vicinity ofthe site. This water system is expected to eliminate potential receptors for groundwater contamination. DOE expects to complete all remediation activities at the site by 2003. AEC's underground detonations at the site resulted in contamination of subsurface areas and groundwater. The potential contaminants of concern for the subsurface are mixed fission products, including plutonium, uranium, and tritium. During cleanup activities conducted at the site in 1972, AEC injected radioactively contaminated soils and water into the test cavity. The injection wells were then sealed with concrete and bentonite when the site was decommissioned. DOE does not plan to remediate subsurface contamination because of the lack of feasible technologies for removing subsurface contamination. However, DOE will use characterization and modeling data to define the areas that will require institutional controls. Negotiations with the State of Mississippi on final site closure criteria were initiated in 1999, and DOE expects all subsurface closure work will be completed by 2003. Mississippi 3
  • 6. National Defense Authorization Act (NOAA) Long-Term Stewardship Report Potential surface contamination at the site resulted from drilling operations after the first test was conducted. Contaminants ofconcern include tritium and diesel fuel in abandoned mud pits, shallow disposal areas, and bum pits. In 1972, AEC initiated cleanup of surface contamination by excavating soils, decommissioning facilities, and disposing of wastes. In 1977, DOE conducted an additional sampling program, with more than 170 exploratory borings, and extensive soil and groundwater sampling. The results of the study showed that tritium contamination was left in the shallow mud pits during the 1972 site cleanup. As a result of this contamination, a plume of tritium extends northwest from the surface-ground-zero mud pits. DOE provided the site remedial investigation report to the State of Mississippi for review and State approval was received in May 2000. The State will make a decision on DOE's closure plans based on its review ofthe documentation. Assuming that the State accepts the current DOE plan, the surface contamination will be left in place to naturally decay to levels that will allow the site to be transferred to the State for use as a demonstration forest and wildlife refuge (approximately 10 years). 0 10 Miles Salmon Site 2.0 SITE-WIDE LONG-TERM STEWARDSHIP 2.1 Long-Term Stewardship Activities DOE expects that the subsurface will be closed and that DOE activities at the site will consist solely oflong-term stewardship activities beginning in 2003. DOE will not maintain an active presence at this site but will be responsible for monitoring and maintaining institutional controls over subsurface contamination. Final long-term stewardship requirements for the subsurface will be negotiated with the State ofMississippi. Periodic monitoring will be conducted to ensure that there is no contaminant migration from the test cavity to the groundwater. DOE does not anticipate that any long-term stewardship activities associated with the remediated surface Mississippi 4
  • 7. Salmon Site contamination will be necessary once the existing levels of contamination have either attenuated or decayed to agreed upon concentration levels, which is estimated to take approximately 10 years. DOE maintains the project-specific records at the Nevada Operations Office in Las Vegas. These records include corrective action investigation workplans and reports; corrective action decision documents; health assessments; risk assessments; information submitted by the public; National Environmental Policy Act documents; and the Public Involvement Plan. The DOE Public Reading Facility and the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Administrative Record are provided with copies of these documents. Upon the completion of the project, all DOE project files will be transferred to controlled storage at the Nevada Operations Office. Records are retained according to DOE records retention procedures. 2.2 Specific Long-Term Stewardship Activities Groundwater A monument has been placed at the site to mark the location of the test cavity. DOE will maintain institutional controls over the subsurface in perpetuity to prevent access to the test cavity, groundwater, and associated subsurface contamination. Institutional controls will include restricting surface intrusions on the site. DOE will continue to conduct annual groundwater monitoring at the site for at least 100 years after closure of the subsurface in 2003. DOE estimates that repair or replacement of groundwater monitoring wells will be required every 25 years. At the end ofthe post-closure groundwater monitoring period in 2103, assuming State regulatory agency approval, the monitoring wells will be plugged and abandoned in place in accordance with State regulations. 2.3 Regulatory Regime In accordance with applicable regulatory drivers listed below, DOE is responsible for identifying the nature and extent of contamination, determining potential risk to the public and the environment, and performing the necessary corrective actions in compliance with guidelines and requirements under federal regulatory drivers, as well as the state-specific regulatory drivers associated with the site location. These responsibilities are delegated to the DOE Office of Environmental Management. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act CRCRA): RCRA was the first comprehensive Federal effort to deal with solid and hazardous waste. RCRA regulates the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. At the Salmon Site, RCRA is enforced to protect human health and the environment; conserve energy and natural resources; reduce the amount of generated waste; and ensure that wastes are managed in an environmentally sound manner. Comprehensive Environmental Response. Compensation. and Liability Act CCERCLA): CERCLA supplies a system for identifying and providing corrective action to sites where hazardous substances have been released into any part of the air, water, groundwater, or land. Provisions of CERCLA include a National Contingency Plan, which establishes procedures for corrective action for hazardous substance releases. Salmon is not regulated under CERCLA; however, the regulations are useful as developmental guidelines. In addition to federal regulations, DOE must comply with State regulatory requirements. In most cases, State ofMississippi requirements are based on federal guidelines; however, in specific cases they may be more detailed and stringent than federal regulations. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC): NRC regulations establish "free release" criteria. The State of Mississippi is not regulated under the NRC; however, the regulations are used as developmental guidelines. Mississippi 5
  • 8. National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Long-Tenn Stewardship Report 2.4 Assumptions and Uncertainties DOE assumes that the State of Mississippi will approve the proposed surface restoration plan. Current land use designations and subsurface intrusion restrictions will continue into the foreseeable future. DOE will reevaluate and modify the subsurface restrictions, as appropriate, as part of the assessment and/or corrective action activities. DOE does not plan to remove subsurface contamination in and around the test cavities. However, DOE will develop subsurface models to define the contaminant boundary and refine the existing subsurface intrusion restrictions, if necessary. Post-closure monitoring will be conducted, as agreed upon in the site closure reports for the subsurface, in order to detect changes in the subsurface conditions. The schedule for groundwater monitoring after closure of the subsurface will be defined in the subsurface closure report. DOE assumes that groundwater monitoring will continue annually after subsurface closure is finalized in 2003 and that monitoring will be performed for 100 years (2003-2103). 3.0 ESTIMATED LONG-TERM STEWARDSHIP COSTS The cost profile in the table below applies to the entire Salmon site. The major long-term stewardship costs are for monitoring activities, data analysis, and repair and replacement of monitoring wells. The spikes in cost are a result of costs associated with repairing or replacing monitoring wells, which are assumed to require maintenance every 25 years. The long-term stewardship costs for the Salmon Site remain roughly constant at $40,000 annually through FY 2010. The higher costs in FY 2000 are associated with the new Real Estate Operations Permit (RE-OP) requirements. The cost increase in 2008 is the result of a periodic review and analysis of the data to evaluate and possibly refine the monitoring strategy. This review and analysis will occur every five years throughout the post- closure monitoring period (2003-2103). DOE projects that the total post-2070 (2071-2103) costs will be approximately $6.8 million dollars. Site Long"Term Stewardship Costs (Constant Ye~l- ~OOODollan) Year(s) Amount Year(s) Amount Year(s) Amount FY 2000 $180,000 FY 2008 $113,000 FY 2036-2040 $272,000 FY 2001 $40,000 FY 2009 $40,000 FY 2041-2045 $272,000 FY 2002 $40,000 FY 2010 $40,000 FY 2046-2050 $273,000 FY 2003 $40,000 FY 2011-2015 $272,000 FY 2051-2055 $2,772,000 FY 2004 $40,000 FY 2016-2020 $272,000 FY 2056-2060 $272,000 FY 2005 $40,000 FY 2021-2025 $272,000 FY 2061-2065 $272,000 FY 2006 $40,000 FY 2026-2030 $2,772,000 FY 2066-2070 $272,000 FY 2007 $40,000 FY 2031-2035 $272,000 PostFY 2070 $6,800,000 4.0 FUTURE USES Public Law 104-201 (the National Defense Authorization Act ofFiscal Year 1997, Section 2851(b), September 1996) allows DOE to transfer the site to the State of Mississippi. It is anticipated that the Salmon Site will be Mississippi 6
  • 9. Salmon Site used as a demonstration forest and wildlife refuge. If the State accepts the property, agreements will be enacted for the transfer. The agreements will be completed prior to the completion of the closure activities and will be predicated on the final agreed upon surface closure criteria and future land use determinations. The anticipated end state for the Salmon Site will allow for future surface use at the site with an NRC designation of "no radiological restrictions." DOE will continue to restrict access to the test cavities, subsurface soil, and groundwater through the use of deed restrictions in perpetuity. For additional information about the Salmon Site, please contact: Monica Sanchez U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office Environmental Restoration Division 232 Energy Way North Las Vegas, NV 89030-4199 Phone: 702-295-0160 sanchezm@nv.doe.gov Mississippi 7