APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
Insemtive Prepayment Slideshare
1. Tackling the Curse of
Prepayment
Collaborative Knowledge
Formalization Beyond Lightweight
Valentin Zacharias & Simone Braun
2. The Curse Of Prepayment
The Curse Of Prepayment
Semantic
Semantic
Technologies promise
great functionality,
great functionality
once a great amount
of knowledge is
formalized
5. Making Every Penny Count –
Immediately
• Immediate benefit for formalizing
even small parts, becomes
ll t b
justification for next part
– Tables, Hierarchical Organisation,
Advanced Search
• D
Datastore never fully formalized
f ll f li d
• Formalizing everything impossible
6. Text &
& Informat
tion Retrieval
Tags &
& Keyword
ds
Semi S
Structured Dat (e.g
g. Wiki)
Taxonomies
Thesa
auri + Skos
s
Web 2.0 Ontology Engineering
Structu
ured Data (e.g. Free
ebase)
Rule La
anguages
OWL D
DL
The Problem of the Brick Wall
The Problem of the Brick Wall
FOL
Ontologies
7. What Weight Problem?
What Weight Problem?
• Usability/Debuggability
• Robustness
• Performace
• Language Expressivity
Language Expressivity
vs. Performance – and
is this even the right
is this even the right
question?
• Mixed/ semi formality
Mixed/ semi‐
Partly based on: Krötzsch, Schaffert, Vrandecic: Reasoning in Semantic Wikis
8. Curse Of Prepayment Again
Curse Of Prepayment ‐ Again
• What is the goal, what is the ‘immediate
g p
benefit of formalizing even small parts’?
– Better retrieval? (e.g. clicking on a tag also returns
things annotated with subtags)
things annotated with subtags)
– Better Navigation? (e.g. when I browse through
my bookmarks)
my bookmarks)
– Organization and Maintainability? (e.g. by defining
data only once and reusing it in tables)
d t l d i it i t bl )
15. Collaborative, Incremental Augmentation of Text Retrieval =
–S i E i f‘
Step wise Extension of ‘normal’ text retrieval in the direction of
l’ i l i h di i f
Question Answering
– Understanding the NL Query < > System query mapping also as
Understanding the NL‐Query <‐> System query mapping also as
collaboratively matured artifacts.
Potential Advantages
• Reasonable E pectations
Expectations
• Incremental and Partial
• Immediate
• Accepted Interface
p
Please see the paper for a bit more technical detail
on how to realize this
16. • Collaboration: System functionality is
created during use by the users (not before
by programmers)
by programmers)
• Incremental: Functionality to answer
q
questions is added step by step; back up
p y p; p
information retrieval engine avoids
disappointment
• Existing Queries: Not ‘speak to the
Existing Queries: Not speak to the
machine’, rather detection of queries done
anyway
17. • ‘Web2.0 Ontology gy
Engineering’ tries to tackle
the Curse Of Prepayment
with a kind of KF where
ith ki d f KF h
every bit of formalization
counts
• Supporting more
heavyweight formalisms
y g
entails many challenges, but
most important is the
finding of new answers to
fi di f t
the Curse of Prepayment
• ‘Collaborative Incremental
Collaborative Incremental
Augmentation of Text Thanks for your attention
Retrieval’ could be one such
answer. Valentin Zacharias
V l ti Z h i
Simone Braun