Small Turbine Testing Fills Gap Between Design and Full Scale
1. Laboratory Group
Small Turbine Engine Testing:
Evaluate New Design Technologies
Replicate Failure in Fielded Components
http://Gas-Turbine-Testing.com
1
2. Presentation Outline
Current Conditions of Engine Testing
Technology Need – Filling the Gap Between Engine
Design and Full Scale Testing
Small Turbine Testing Method & Characterization
Failure Mechanisms Replicated Using Small Turbine
Testing
Developing Acceptance Test for Corrosion Induced
Cracking
Capabilities & Benefits of Small Turbine Testing
2
3. Current Conditions of Engine Testing
Full scale gas turbine engine testing is expensive &
time consuming
Testing to failure is seldom performed on full scale
engines
Testing to failure is needed to fully assess the fatigue
durability of components
Other conventional testing methods used early in
design process do not replicate the actual
environmental conditions produced in operational
engines
Today’s conditions leave a gap between conventional testing
methods used during the design process and expensive full
scale testing
3
4. Filling the Gap Between Engine Design and Full
Scale Testing
Need for a cost effective testing method that allows:
Testing components to failure; multiple times
Assess the durability of components in realistic
operating environment
Timely test turn around & acquisition of data
Small engine tests produces component failures in realistic
operating conditions and tests them to failure multiple times
quickly and inexpensively
4
5. Small Turbine Engine Testing
Monitor & acquire data from operating turbine
Reproduce realistic environmental conditions
Successfully test multiple failure mechanisms
Compare & validate scaled turbine test data with full
scale engine testing results
Reproduce & effectively measure realistic turbine engine
environmental conditions
5
6. Example Small Turbine Engine
Specifications
• Burner temperature 1700F
• Uses 12 gallons per hour of fuel
• 5.1” diameter
• 112,000 RPM at max
• Axial flow, integrally bladed,
INCO-713 turbine rotor
Realistic environment, fast turn around & cost efficient
6
7. Full Characterization of Small Turbine
Engine
Rotating thermocouples Static thermocouples
Strain gages Pressure probes
Small turbine testing is fully instrumented
7
10. Issue Identification
Air Force field issues with corrosion lead to HCF
failures in steel compressor blades
HCF failure results from crack initiation in corrosion pit
Multiple compressor stages exhibit corrosion
Prior efforts to reproduce corrosion in lab environment
were unsuccessful
Objective is to replicate field corrosion under realistic
operation conditions utilizing small turbine
10
11. Testing Approach
Experience demonstrates that the free turbine application
best meets the testing objectives
Starting point - USAF provided full scale engine performance
Test stand consist of four major sub systems
– Gas generator
– Rotor with full size blades
– Drive system
– Air handling/ contaminate system
Variable Forced cooling
pressure bleed Air Rotor Blade
assembly
Gas
Generator
Drive
Contaminate system
System
Motor
11
12. Rotor/blade attachment
• Two piece split rim design for easy assembly
• Blades spacer application allows for multiple blade spacer
combination.
• Rotor designed for robust operation in adverse environment
12
13. Drive system
• System uses belt drive
• 15 Hp motor is controlled by
Variable Frequency Drive
(VFD)
• Drive system produces
12,000 RPM loaded speed
13
14. Instrumentation
Signals from
instrumentation
Gas Generator Instrumentation
• K-type thermocouple - EGT
• Magnetic pickup – turbine speed Compact
• PCB accelerometers – vibratory load DAQ system
Test stand Instrumentation
• Vane flow meter – contaminate dosing
• PCB accelerometers – belt/pulley imbalance National Instruments Modules
•K-type thermocouple – rotor inlet gas temperature • Two NI9239 general purpose
•VFD statistics • One NI9233 accelerometer
oMotor speed • One NI9211 thermocouple
oMotor load
oDrive frequency
14
15. Small Turbine Testing for Corrosion
Blades tested - 10
Detailed blade examination – 20 hrs of operation
Photo documentation
Replicas created
Total Test time – 75 hrs - Corrosion Reproduced
15
16. Comparison of USAF Fielded and Small
Engine Tested Blades
42 µm
60 µm
Damage of fielded blade after Damage on tested blade after 51
583 hours hours
Test damage mechanism is same as field damage
mechanism
16
17. Small Turbine Testing Results of USAF
Corrosion Test
Confirmed corrosion is the cause of initial damage
Confirmed sulfur was primary corrosion driver
Test replicated the corrosion observed in the fielded blades
Corrosion HCF failure
Sulfur drives Crack initiates
Corrosion in Large
damage sites
Corrosion Pit size is not
at grain indicative of
boundary damage
Reproduced blade corrosion in just 60-90 days
17
19. Small Turbine Engine Capability
Accurate, realistic testing capability designed for early
identification of failure issues
Reducing the amount of small scale specimen
testing
Improving the validity of full scale engine testing
Accelerating design certification
Ability to bridge the gap between specimen & full scale testing for
turbine engines
19
20. Benefits of Small Turbine Engine
PRE-EMPTIVE
Identify Issues During Design
Phases, Prevent Fielded
Failures
TIMELY RESULTS ENGINE RELEVANT
Useable Information in Weeks, Complex Capabilities Provide
Not Months Real World Results
COST EFFECTIVE
A Fraction of the Cost of
Traditional Methods
20
21. VEXTEC Laboratory Group Contact Info
• http://Gas-Turbine-Testing.com
• Ed Pope
– 317-750-3414 / epope@vextec.com
21