Good Argument Essay

Do People Have A Good Argumentative Writing?
People write in order to achieve communicative goals in a social context. Their capability in writing
argumentation is supposed to be a measurement of logical thinking they have. Argumentative writing
is a genre of writing that requires the writer to investigate a topic, and establish a position on the
topic in a concise manner (Purdue Online Writing Lab [Purdue OWL], 2013). Thus, to have a good
argumentative writing, someone needs directed logic and the ability to analyze something that is
currently happening and developing in the area he is exactly standing
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Qualities of a Good Essay
Qualities of a good essay
Given below is the process that should be followed for essay writing. 1Select the topic of your
essay, be careful about its wording. 1. Choose the central idea, or thesis, of your essay. For example:
Information technology has revolutionized the way we work. 2. Outline your essay into introductory,
body and summary paragraphs. 3. The introductory paragraph begins with an interesting sentence.
For example: Home workers have grown from 150,000 to over 12 million in the past 5 years thanks
to the wonders of the computer. 4. After this first sentence, add your thesis statement from above. 5.
Use one sentence to introduce each body paragraph to follow. For example: The Internet has made
this...show more content...
It turned out to be sound advice as my friend is very good at presenting her arguments. What's
more, her father never lost a court case. He was 76–0 with law suits against him. Not too bad, eh?
Below is an effective outline to use when you write your essay. Don't forget to include as many of
the points as possible to make yourargument essay even more effective.
Argument Essay Outline:
Paragraph 1: State Your Proposition– Requires a general introduction of the problem plus your
opinion about said problem.
Paragraph 2–3: Anticipate Opposition – State history of the problem including failed attempts at
resolution of the problem (include sources)
Paragraph 4–6: Expand Your Argument– Extent of the problem i.e., who is affected, how bad is it,
etc (include sources)
Paragraphs 7–8: Anticipate Consequences – Repercussions of the problem not being solved. (include
sources)
Paragraphs 9–10: Connect with the Facts – Anticipate objections and make concessions while
connecting your arguments with the facts.
Paragraph 11: Conclude – Restatement of thesis and summary of main ideas.
Something found in all good argument essays are appeals to the following three areas. People are
more likely to be persuaded when you touch upon all three of the following areas as opposed to just
one or two of them. 1. Reason 2. Ethics 3. Emotion
Not all people are persuaded by logic. (My wife, for example ;–) Likewise, some require an appeal
to the ethic to

Othello : An Argumentative Essay
Othello: An Argumentative Essay
Inside each of us, there is a seed of good and evil since it is a constant struggle for us to determine
as to which one will win, so that is why one cannot exist without the other. However, there are some
whose emotions are unbalanced, which causes them to near towards one side more than the other
one ВВ and many times the side a lot of people prefer to lean on is evil. Shakespeare's play O thello
is set in 16thВcentury Venice and Cyprus.Othello, a noble black general from the Venetian army has
secretly married Desdemona, daughter of Venice senator Brabantio. Othello chooses inexperienced
Cassio to be his lieutenant, while he decides to give the ensign position to Iago, a malicious but very
experienced man who, with his stealth and knavery, will ultimately ruin almost everyone's life
since for a long time, he was desiring the position of lieutenant just like Cassio. At the end of the
play, Othello, Desdemona, Iago's wife Emilia, and his sidekick Roderigo die due to his revenge
against Cassio, for obtaining the position he wanted and Othello, for being the man who he hates
the most. The play ends with Iago being told that he will be punished and tortured for his actions.
However, despite the fact that Iago is punished at the end of the play for doing all of the malicious
things he did, he still manages to wear down Othello's relationship with Desdemona, get Cassio
demoted from his lieutenancy, and cause Othello to show his cowardness by

In Rebecca Jones' article, "Finding the Good Argument OR Why Bother With Logic", she states
her claim as being argument is a metaphor for war. She explains that argument happens between
two people who are on opposite points of view on an issue, where one person is trying to get the
other one to think about what they are saying and where their view is coming from. Jones states that
arguments are known to be "bad", "heated", and "violent." (156). She then uses examples like the
comic strips of an argument that seem to be a cat fight, a metaphor about an argument being like a
war which means there are only two sides, only one side should win and a compromise means
defeat. She also states that to be able to understand a person's logic, we have

Evaluation Of A Good Argument
7.3 – Neutralization of the fallacy:
In paragraph 4 the author has violated the sufficiency criterion of a good argument. The author has
violates the sufficiency criteria by committing the fallacy of false analogy. In paragraph 4 the author
states, "In the mid 1940s – before publicly funded healthcare – my grand parents sold their car to
pay the hospital bill related to my father's birth, so "purchasing" the birth of a child is nothing
new." This is a wrong analogy. Just because you pay for hospital bill and cloning, does not make
them the same. In one situation, two persons life is preserved, and in the other a person's life is
changed. The author could have avoided this fallacy by not comparing these two totally different
situations at all or giving an analogy that has the same situation as human cloning.
7.4 – Positive Critique:
In the fifth paragraph the author argues that the paternal and maternal linages are not the most
important thing as what we identify ourselves with us humans, which is quite convincing. As his
first premise he states, "Most people I know do identify with both their maternal and paternal
lineages." As his second premise he states, "Dual heritage may be normal, but it is seems central to
our conception of ourselves as humans." And as third premise he sates, "And identical twins seems
none worse for the knowledge that they are not genetically unique individuals." Even though that
was said that this argument is convincing, it is not without

Good Counter Argument
When reading both sides of the argument "Filling America's need for skilled workers," the side that
had the most effective argument was the Con side. It uses rhetorical devices, logical reasoning and
a good counter argument. Those three things lead to a good and effective argument and also
supports a claim. By using rhetorical devices it can make the article persuasively and effectively
appeal to the readers. Logical reasoning uses analysis to help writers invent, demonstrate, and prove
arguments. And a good counter argument gives the reader a chance to respond to your objections
before they have finished reading. This argument uses rhetorical devices which boost the argument
and claim. The author uses the quote in paragraph 6 and 7 "Instead,

Philo's Argument Analysis
Philo does not mind that the argument is a posteriori; his only complaint is that it is a bad
argument. Philo brings up several ways in which the argument from design fails as an inductive
inference. To begin with, he claims that the analogy is no good. He asserts that the universe and a
machine are not comparable in the way that the red and blue flames are comparative, and hence, a
contention by similarity is not substantial. Philo's second objection is that the analogy does not work
since it is between an entire and a part of that entirety. A machine is a part of theuniverse, and it
looks bad to accept that one part of the universe is comparable to the entire of the universe since we
have no experience of alternate parts. Philo's third objection is that not all order is the result of
design. Therefore, it is conceivable that the universe is not undifferentiated from a machine despite
the fact that it is requested; it may be practically equivalent to some other type of request and not to
a man–made structure. For instance, some highly ordered systems that we know of are the result of
reproduction instead of intelligent design. Just because there is order, therefore, it does not mean
...show more content...
that God is altogether inconceivable) is for all intents and purposes secularism: it compels you to say
that you have no clue what is out there controlling the world. Cleanthes thinks that Philo is objecting
to the design argument on the premise of the case that God's wise configuration can't be the last
cause and that, hence, it can't be the cause by any means. He, therefore, responds that all
philosophers must admit that extreme causes are obscure. Somewhat later, Philo softens up with an
entirely new line of assault. Philo does not guarantee that inquiries are left unanswered by the design
hypothesis; rather, says that this hypothesis does not provide any explanation of the order of the

Argument Essay: Do We Have Good Grammar?
Have you ever been so nervous for a job interview that you forgot everything you practice to say in
front of the employer? I have not, but has it ever crossed your mind what the employer expected
from you? Sure, they want you to be qualified for the position and have a nice background, but
having good grammar, is another story. I personally disagree that having good grammar for a
specific position is important unless, it is in politics, journalism or Microsoft. Jobs that require
grammar, but for call centers or even retail, is just plain ridiculous. Therefore, when hiring people
for a job, it is important that they must know how to use proper grammar in order to work, Kyle
Wiens, in his article, "I Won't Hire People Who Use Poor Grammar. Here's Why." he says " I have
a "zero tolerance approach" to grammar mistakes that make people look stupid" (1). Wiens further
asserts that "they deserve to be passed over for a job" (1). Whether, a person qualifies for the
position, but does not have good grammar, they are not fitt for the job. Although, there may be
fewer people that only look for applicants who is qualified for...show more content...
Here's Why." he explains that "good grammar is credibility," whether it is on the internet, on a
blog or on Facebook, "your words are all you have" (1). If a person cannot tell the difference
between their, there, and they're, people will judge you. A good writer will know how to speak in
a job interview. They would know exactly what to say when being interviewed. In Wiens article,
"I Won't Hire People Who Use Poor Grammar. Here's Why," he mentions that "good grammar
makes good business sense." It shows how well educated a person is and that they know how to be
a great salesmen.Therefore, in my belief, that is too much to ask for a job

Is College education worth it? A lot of people go to college for a lot of reasons. Most people go
for higher employment so they can get a good job, which leans them toward more money, which
is also why a lot of people go to college. Another reason is because they want to say they went to
college and have that experience. And those are all good reasons for going to college. The debate
is still at large and many are fighting about it not being as worth it as many have thought in the
past. People see it as a waste of money as there are good paying jobs that just need a high school
education. College tuition has gone up and people are saying it is a scam, as the price of college
tuition was less in the past. Being said that, it was the past but...show more content...
They also seem to mature in college as they make more decisions. According to a Pew Research
journal, "The survey also finds that the public sees higher education as having two basic missions of
similar importance. Some four–in–ten say the main purpose of college should be to help an
individual grow personally and intellectually, while nearly half say it should be to teach specific
skills and knowledge that can be used in the workplace." So money isn't the only reason people go
to college. They grow in smarts and in peace of mind. "Also, most jobs that require a bachelor's,
master's, doctoral or professional degree tend to also provide more benefits. This can include health
care, retirement investment, travel and other perks. These types of benefits are rarely offered for
high–school–level jobs. Part of the reason employment benefits are so important is because they
offer stability for your family, especially in the case of health care. They are called benefits, but in
reality, they are a vital part of anyone's salary. In some cases, the value of benefits even exceeds an
employee's take–home pay. Families of college graduates are generally better off economically and
socially. But it is also more likely that the next generation of children will attend college. So you
can look at it as an investment in the future of your family." (Benefits of Earning a College Degree).
So it can help in the future in so many

Essay about Arguing Against Standardized Testing
To many students standardized testing has become another part of schooling that is dreaded.
Standardized testing has been a part of school since the nineteen–thirties; in those days it was used as
a way to measure students that had special needs. Since the time that standardized test have been in
American schools there has been many programs that have placed an importance on the idea of
standardized testing such as the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Evans 1). Over the years the
importance of standardized testing has increased tremendously and so has the stakes, not only for
teachers but also students. All states in the United States of America have state test in order to
measure how much students learn, and help tell how well the...show more content...
Most standardized test do not measure emotional or mechanical intelligence, actually a lot of
educators argue that standardized test do not measure comprehension or actual intelligence but
rather memorization. While others may believe that standardized testing just needs a few
improvements, others believe that it is impossible to have a test that measures accurately the
capability of a diverse student population. Today's schooling depends heavily on the test scores from
standardized test. Standardized testing should not have so much weight put on them because they
have a negative impact on effective education, students' self–concept, and learning styles.
Although standardized testing has been a major part of schooling it has also had a negative impact
on effective education. Standardized has made a huge impact on public schooling so much that not
only does it affect the students but also the teachers. With the teachers now beginning to get raises or
having their jobs on the line if their students fail the test, many students have not been getting the
fullest education process that they could get. Students may not realize the impact that it has had on
the type of teaching style that they receive because they are so used to it. With so many teachers not
having a lot of time to teach what is on the test and the other things that they feel are important to
students to know, a lot of

Examples Of Argumentative Essay
Argumentative essay presents a point of view about something and explains the reasons in order to
win readers' agreement. It is built around a specific statement (or main premise) that is debatable
within the field in which students are studying. In other words, at the center of an argumentative
essay is a statement with which readers may disagree. The argumentative essay will need to support
that statement in a manner that convinces the readers of its truth. It mainly strives to convince the
reader of the writer's point of view, using reasonable and ethical methods .The process of argument
composition varies from writer to writer, most writers follow these three stages: forming an
argument, which can consist of discovering a motive for writing and identifying an audience to
address, discovering and sharpening a position, and developing an appropriate style; supporting the
argument; and reviewing the argument, which can include considering the image projected by
argument, making substantial additions or deletions to a first draft, and adding an introduction and
conclusion (Cheng and Chen 2009, Day,1997, Liu,2005,Mayberry,2009)....show more content...
The first feature is superstructure which refers to the organizational plan of any text and the linear
progression of the text. The second feature is the quality of logical reasoning which is assessed by
analyzing the interrelationships of writers' assertions and the associated support or data provided to
substantiate those claims. The third feature is identified as persuasive appeal, including affective
appeal and establishment of writer credibility. Finally, she notes that audience awareness is an
important characteristic of successful argumentative writing. The writer must observe an awareness
of the reader's perspective by dealing implicitly or explicitly with possible

Argumentative Essay On Fasting
Accounts of fasting can be traced back thousands of years. The primary purpose of fasting in those
days was to flee from the distraction of eating, to give your full attention to something else, often
through the form of prayer. However, fasting is becoming increasingly popular in a different kind of
way. Today many scientists and doctors are studying fasting as a type of healing process, not just
mentally, but also physically. These beneficial effects have been seen in the treatment of weight loss,
mental health, cancer, skin disease, and a host of other ailments. While fasting may not be safe for a
select few, the possibility of life changing benefits warrants everyone's consideration.
Many people refer to the problem of overweight Americans as an epidemic, and rightfully so. "The
National Center for Health Statistics (2002) estimated that in 1999, 61% of U.S. adults were
overweight" (Dean 303). The main reason so many Americans are overweight is that food is
everywhere. We see advertisements for food constantly, such as commercials, billboards, food
trucks, restaurants, and grocery stores. With so much food around us, it can be hard not to want
to eat all the time. This reality of food everywhere is a very new concept. People have not had
access to food in the way they do today ever before in history. Fasting has been shown to quickly
and effectively get weight off.
Dr. Rex Russell describes a three week fast conducted by Dr. George Thampy, a biochemist at the

The debate whether human is naturally good or bad has been argued for centuries. The debate
started hundreds of years ago and still is a big argument today. When the argument is really
dissected and looked at thoroughly correct answer is rather clear. Humans are naturally evil and the
evidence to support this claim is strong. People are greedy and perform evil acts to benefit
themselves. Laws are created to attempt to keep people in check, but they only work so well. Are
humans really as thoughtful and kind hearted as some people think? Mencius lived in a time where
Confucians were split on the question of human nature (Mencius 78). Some believed that people
were supposed to study their ancestors and take up their practices. Mencius comprehended this as
people were naturally good. On the other hand Tzu believed that people were inherently evil
because they needed rites to keep the people in check. Tzu believed that the rites restricted people
from going toward their natural disposition to be evil (Tzu 84). Much later in history Thomas
Hobbes and John Locke were still on opposing sides of this subject. Hobbes believed, like Mencius,
that humans naturally want power and that...show more content...
John Locke believes that most people keep their promises and are mostly good. Some people do
keep promises and do good in the world but it isn't natural. Yes, people do sometimes help others,
but there is a deeper reason for helping than helping just for the sake of helping. People that help
others benefit in some way. An example of my people would do good is for attention or to seem
like something they aren't. People want to appear like they are kind hearted but they always
benefit from getting some type of fame or praise for doing good. When people do god they have
to sit back and think about it first, it doesn't come first nature. Locke is correct in believing people
do good, but it isn't human's natural nature to do so and they don't do it just to do

Common Good Argument
Galston (2013) claims that idea of the common good "has real content in theory and real utility in
practice", throughout his essay on the common good, he provides sufficient evidence to back his
main claim and he uses it to refute the arguments of others. He defines three key aspects of the
common good to support his claim of the common good having "real content in theory", these
include: 'Inherently social goods', 'Social linkages' and 'The good of the commons'. Galston (2013)
then proceeds to give evidence on the concept of bargaining and the U.S. Constitution; he uses these
examples to support his claim that the common good has "real utility in practice". I believe Galston
understands the academic conversation around the common good quite...show more content...
One example he gives based on inherently social goods is humor, "telling a joke to oneself is
virtually impossible, because humor requires surprise", as a result, this allows us to make the
inference that there are certain aspects of life that require the company of others and without it, the
good (humor in this case) would be lost. Galston (2013) states that 'The good of the commons' is
when how people behave in shared social spaces impacts others (p.11). "If we carelessly leave an
unextinguished fire in a camp–ground, the entire facility may go up in flames." (p.11), this shows
how the common good includes everyone's best interests and this example in fact shows that it does
have "real content in theory" as it is quite easy to imagine the scenarios he has presented, occurring
in real

What Makes An Effective Argument Ineffective?
1.The basic parts of an effective argument are a stated clearly defined issue, makes a claim, and
offers support for that claim. Sometimes an argument may also recognize opposing viewpoints and
incorporate them into the argument
2.What makes an argument ineffective is when using emotional appeals to distract a reader from a
lack of evidence. Also the use of faulty reasoning, and inaccurate facts.
3.An issue is a problem, controversy, or an idea that people can have different viewpoints about.
The term claim is a point in which a writer is trying to prove. This is typically the writer's viewpoint
on the issue. A refutation is recognizing and auguring against opposing viewpoints.
4.A claim of value focuses on an opinion or judgment about

A Good Argument: Personal Narrative
Module 1 was a good start for me. I took a year break from college to work while I was changing my
major, so when we started off by writing our personal narratives I had to re–familiarize myself with
їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»
I had forgotten how to format papers and a few other paper writing skills as well. It was nice to get
back into writing. I used the Purdue Owl website quite a bit to help me gather the information I
had lost. I picked up a lot of good information on Argumentation. Arguing doesn't have to be yelling
at someone about who is right and who is wrong. Arguing is a conversation with a goal. A good
argument uses facts, polls, and surveys to prove a point. I liked the power points. I think I

Good Argument Analysis
In the book "Good Reasons" they start off with showing you how to make an effective argument.
The first question they ask you is "What exactly is an argument?". This makes you think critically
about the definition of an argument and how you would create one in your writings. They then go
over what is expected from the writer when making a written argument, such as how to argue
responsibly and respectfully. "Our culture is competitive, and our goal often is to win." Usually
people are more likely to listen when you place yourself as a respectful partner not a competitor.
When you can argue respectfully and not try to cast yourself as a competitor, you then make an
effective way to converse. I agree with the fact that you shouldn't necessarily

In order to have a good argumentative essay, there are a few important standards of critical
thinking that is needed to be found in the essay such as the clearness, accuracy, importance or
relevance, sufficiency, depth, breath and precision that is stated by Nosich. The strength of this
argumentative essay is consider weak because it does not capture the interest of the reader and
was not persuasive enough; even though from the introduction of the argumentative essay
includes full sentences and a good opinion, the argumentative essay is all objective. The
introduction includes too much of the emotional appeals, such as when it wrote " Day after day
the number of people worshipping this icon has been growing since the birth of this creature. well
to many it may seem harmless idol but in my opinion, Mickey Mouse is an 'devil in disguise'
influencing the minds of young and old people to adopt the culture of the 'devil' which doesn't
blend will with the moral values of society and should be banned". To improve the introduction, the
writer should include of all objectives statements relative facts and appeals to the mind of people
who agree or disagree with the topic.

The Importance Of Writing An Argumentative Essay
As a student in a beginning English class some elements may seem difficult at the beginning but
with practice they become long lasting skills. Writing an argumentative is not an easy task there is a
lot of elements that have to come together to create a successful essay but as many other things, it
requires constant practice and effort. At the start of this course I wasn't a very good writer myself,
and I can see the huge improvement this course made by looking at my first argumentative essay. I
was able to identify and apply the requisites of a good argument essay. A well thought structure,
reliable evidence, and a counterargument are three essential components of argumentative writing.
The structure of an essay is the foundation to a good argumentative paper. Throughout this course
I learned the importance of having an essay structure, before I started this class I didn't have a
very clear vision of how to correctly format my essay. In my diagnostic essay, which was the first
one I wrote for English 1302, had five paragraphs. That is considered a standard structure of many
essays but it is more of a skeleton. Looking back at that essay I see how poor my introduction was,
I did not even have a clear thesis. One only thing even close to one that I could spot was, "The
"millennials," people born in the last two decades of the 20th century, are failing to reflect Rich's
model for a good education." It merely addresses the topic in a simple way. It did not serve the
purpose a

Global Warming Argumentative Essay
Global Warming: Myth or Fact? The Global Warming theory has become increasingly popular over
the past few years. Citizens of the world are being encouraged to be more environmentally conscious
by others including politicians, celebrities, and world organizations. The problem with the theory
lies in the fact that it has become more and more controversial as it gains publicity and attention. The
basic concept behind this theory is that the earth was made with a balance of "greenhouse gasses".
These gasses are naturally occurring within the atmosphere and they essentially make the planet
habitable by keeping it warm. When the world became more industrialized, the amount of carbon
dioxide that was being emitted into the atmosphere...show more content...
The more people habituating the planet, the more potential there is for emission of greenhouse
gasses. In short, the basis of this argument other than years of documented research and scientific
discovery is what harm could we do by being more conservative in our use of energy and other
entities that produce more than their share of greenhouse gasses? The answer as it stands now is
none. The harmful effects of ignoring this crisis are all but proven fact. The problem that the pro–
global warming theorists have created is that of social standing and little else. While there may be
scientific backing to support some of the theory, the media presents the problem with great
sensationalism. Global warming and energy conservation has thus become a trend and losses some
of its validity through this. The scare tactics used by the media to "promote awareness" are just that,
a linguistic ploy to gain favor. "Awareness of this global threat reinforced public concern and
environmental problems and thereby provided environmental activists, scientists, and policy makers
with new momentum in their efforts to promote environmental protection." (McCright, 2000) This
statement draws line to the potential benefits that would be received if the pro–global warming
theorists were to draw enough attention to the issue. Driven by social empowerment and conviction
to environmental protection, these activists misrepresent the actual threat and paint it as being much
more

Good Argument Essay

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais de Custom Paper Services

Mais de Custom Paper Services (20)

Último

Último (20)

Good Argument Essay